What We Know So Far From the House Intelligence Committee Hearing on Russia
Here’s what we know, so far, from the first hour or so of the House Intelligence Committee hearing on Russia, which includes testimony from FBI Director James Comey and Adm. Michael S. Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency.
— There is no information supporting Trump’s tweets alleging that Obama ordered a wiretap, and that such allegations have not exactly helped our working relationship with other countries, specifically Britain and Germany. Comey adamantly rebutted Trump’s allegations.
Reporters should now state clearly that the president lied about Barack Obama and our British allies tapping phones at Trump Towers.— Mika Brzezinski (@morningmika) March 20, 2017
— The FBI is investigating potential collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, but James Comey cannot comment on the open, ongoing investigation, nor can he really even comment on the character of the investigation. Comey, however, repeatedly refuses to comment on Roger Stone or his admitted relationship with Julian Assange, or the Russian hacker responsible for the DNC and John Podesta hacks. The investigation, by the way, began three months before the election (Comey attempted to beg reporters off the investigation before the election).
— The Republican members of the hearing are almost exclusively asking questions about the illegal leaks. Comey insists that it is illegal to disseminate classified information. One Republican congressman, Trey Gowdy (South Carolina), is trying to suggest that it’s illegal for reporters to publish the information. Comey won’t comment on whether that is illegal, but says that no reporter has been prosecuted for publishing leak information in his lifetime and that it would be highly unusual for it to happen.
Basically, the GOP is trying to discredit the leaked information. Comey, meanwhile, will not admit that there is an investigation into the leaks.
Former/longtime GOP Senate staffer/McCain adviser —-> https://t.co/2fE8NRTMqp— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) March 20, 2017
Will one, just one, GOP member of the House Intel committee show as much interest in the subject of the leaks as they are in the leaking?— Mark Salter (@MarkSalter55) March 20, 2017
Moscow carried out an attack on our democracy and House Republicans are focused on leaks. This is why they can't be trusted to investigate.— Evan McMullin (@Evan_McMullin) March 20, 2017
— If you have a minute, Representative Adam Schiff’s opening statement is well worth watching. It goes point by point through all the circumstantial evidence linking Trump and his campaign to Russia, and while it doesn’t prove anything definitive, it suggests that it is highly unlikely that all of connections is coincidental. None of this information is new, but it’s never been combined into one lengthy report. It is damning as hell. Unfortunately, the GOP is trying to cloud the wealth of circumstantial evidence by focusing on how the information was disseminated, rather than the information itself.
- What if 'Independence Day' with Will Smith is a Warning?
- With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: Voting for the Pajiba 10 Begins Now
- The 10 Best Movies Of 2019 So Far
- Meghan McCain Wants to Quit 'The View' (WHY, GOD?!)
- 'Yesterday' Is A Love Letter To East Anglia