web
counter
 

The 7 Most Boring Blockbusters

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Seriously Random Lists | Comments (65)



The-Matrix-Revolutions-thumb-560xauto-26118.gif

When summer rolls around each year, we come to expect a certain style of blockbuster. Bruckheimer, Bay, Emmerich: More times than not, they’ll provide us with all the explosions a $150 million production budget can afford, as many ass shots as a PG-13 ratings will allow, and a few cringe-worthy zings in between the BOOMS. I can accept that, and anyone that wants to spend a lot of time in multiplexes during the summer has to. We bring our spittoons to collect the drool and the brain cells, and we walk out with a wan smile on our faces, a headache, and slightly larger testicles. Popcorn entertainment. Escapism. Big, dumb, fun.

But what I cannot oblige is Big, Dumb, Dull. I can watch Fast & Furious movies, even enjoy the Bad Boys films, and readily accept movies like Pearl Harbor, Independence Day and The Rock. Bad movies, perhaps. But they pass the time. It’s the ones that actually extend the time that I can’t abide. Sure, Spider-man 3 was terrible, but it had a few moments of (unintentional) comedy, and even a blockbuster like Van Helsing provided some train-wreck entertainment. But the movies below: They were just dull. Boring. Wearying. A chore.

Note that to qualify, the movie had to embody the spirit of blockbuster and gross more than $100 million. I also limited the list to seven to avoid angering the Lord of the Rings fans.

7. Transformers 2: Honestly, for what it was, I enjoyed the first Transformers film. It was unexceptional, but it was crackling in its stupidity. Transformers 2 just sucked — it was no fun. It wasn’t just the incoherent fight scenes — it was everything else in between: Pointless excursions between extravagant set pieces.

6. Hulk: Most of us can appreciate Ang Lee as a great filmmaker, but only the most contrarian among you will vouch for his Hulk, a bad art film disguised as summer blockbuster. I get it. I respect it. But, man, it made for a slow-moving, dull Hulk, a monster movie with a Shrek-looking beast that didn’t even arrive until the 40 minute mark. Ang Lee transformed HULK SMASH into HULK NAP.

5. The Da Vinci Code: The Da Vinci code was an attempt to make summer blockbusters for boring old white people, and to that extent, I suppose it was a success. The fact that there was a lot of talking was supposed to suggest a smarter blockbuster, but when the dialogue is as empty (and less exciting) than a Baysplosion, it kind of defeats the purpose. Plus, I’ll never forgive Da Vinci for essentially inspiring the National Treasure movies, which are terrible. But then again, at least they’re not boring.

4. Avatar: The highest-grossing film of all time certainly has its defenders (and our own SLW is one), but putting aside the “game-changing” visuals, I couldn’t get over how detached the film felt. Someday, it may be an awesome exhibit in a cinema museum, but the movie itself felt like watching a National Geographic special on Pandora.

3. Matrix Revolutions: Considering how influential and kinetic the fight scenes in the first Matrix were, it’s remarkable how zip-less and tedious the Wachowskis managed to make the action sequences in Revolutions. The plots themselves suited Keanu Reeves’ woodenness; it was the action that brought the first movie alive. Revolutions had none of that; it was a weak and tedious conclusion to a franchise that had already lost its way.

2. Titanic: Titanic was a three-hour love story that felt too contrived to be romantic. It was a excruciatingly dull costume drama that just happened to feature a giant ship sinking, but to get to there, we had to suffer through two hours of tedium. By the time Leo found himself wading in icy waters, I just wanted him Winslet to dunk him so I could go the hell home.

1. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest: It’s very possible that Pirates of the Caribbean: At the End of the World is even more dull than Dead Man’s Chest but like many people, I refused to put myself through it after the excruciatingly dull, hours-long incoherent second film, which essentially managed to go absolutely nowhere and still end in a cliffhanger. Dead Man’s Chest was a disaster, and it didn’t even have the decency to be a fun disaster. A long, bloated, empty slog, and one of the least pleasant experiences I’ve ever head in a movie theater.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba After Dark 5/19/11 | The Only 12 People On The 2011 Forbes Celebrity 100 List I Wouldn't Kick In The Taint









Comments

The number one on this list marked the official end of any obligation I ever felt to be "in the know" by seeing all the big summer movies.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at May 19, 2011 3:11 PM

I would've put Transformers 2 at the top. I've caught bits and pieces of that on cable and I can never muster the will to watch the whole thing because it's just so crushingly uninteresting. Michael Bay needs to learn that it doesn't matter how much is going on on the screen at once if it's impossible to care about any of it.

Posted by: Todd at May 19, 2011 3:14 PM

PotC At World's End was so, so much longer and so, so much worse. You dodged a bullet on that one. My kids want me to take them to see the new one, and I probably will, but I'm sort of dreading it.

Posted by: RebaSays at May 19, 2011 3:18 PM

Right on with Dead Man's Chest. I must have been in some kind of Keira Knightley trance until there was a swordfight atop a giant water wheel. At that moment I realized I wasted my money.

Posted by: Allen at May 19, 2011 3:20 PM

I have to disagree. I'd say Matrix: Revolutions and Avatar should be even higher on the list. Bored the shit of me.

While I would not claim in any way, shape or form that POTC: Dead Man's Chest was a good movie, or the opposite of boring, but Bill Nighy and Stellan Skarsgard kept it from being absolutely deadly dull. (In my opinion.)

Posted by: MM at May 19, 2011 3:20 PM

Avatar was indeed long and boring. Titanic as well. What is with these movies that are overhyped? You watch them and instantly want those hours of your life back. I spent plenty of time going to the bathroom for most of these when I watched them in the theater. It's really just unfair that they put so much money and time into this when there's children all over the world who need clothes and shelter. Really!

Posted by: Gina at May 19, 2011 3:21 PM

I have had a similar experience with Transformers 2. I got HBO recently so I could watch "A Game Of Thrones." Since it had been about 3 years since I last had HBO, I felt like I should watch some movies on it. "Transformers 2" was playing a lot. Since I was mildly entertained by the first one, I gave the second a try. I tried on two diffferent ocassions to watch it. Once, I started and the beginning and the other time I started about the time with the scene with Dwight as the college professor. I lasted about 20 minutes each time. Just awful.

Me and Lady Donut recently tried to re-watch Matrix: Reloaded and were both so bored that we quite half way through and returned the Netflix DVD.

I gave up on the Pirate movies after the fist. Johnny Depp was amusing, but he wasn't enough to generate much interest.

Avatar and Da Vinci Code were very, very dull. Never saw "The Hulk."

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at May 19, 2011 3:23 PM

Count me as a contrarian with HULK. I like the fact that Lee took risks with the film. Granted the creature itself might look weak in parts but the editing and visuals more than make up for it in my opinon. Lee created more of a horror film then a superhero flick. The folks who marketed the picture, didn't get the memo and opted to advertise it as a superhero flick. I think that might be one of the reasons it was so ill received by some critics and many viewers. Pity.

Posted by: Mr. West at May 19, 2011 3:30 PM

I'm so glad to hear I'm not the only one who did not enjoy Titanic. It took me years and several attempts to actually watch the whole movie. I was shunned in H.S. for not falling all over myself because of that movie. Apparently having boobs meant I was supposed to love it. Bleh.

Posted by: Sarah at May 19, 2011 3:33 PM

I'm not being contrarian, but I liked Ang Lees Hulk. I think it's one of the better comic book movies out there. It clearly beats Spiderman 1 and most of Spiderman 2 (the scenes without Alfred Molina).

Posted by: FabMax at May 19, 2011 3:35 PM

Wait, are there four PotC movies? With the new one, that makes four? Not only did I miss the third one, I didn't even know it had been made.

Posted by: Brenton at May 19, 2011 3:37 PM

I used to think the same thing about Spiderman 3, but when I tried to watch it again it was dreadfully boring. Emo Peter Parker just isn't quite funny enough to make up for the tedium of the rest of that movie.

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at May 19, 2011 3:42 PM

I'll admit it. I am also an Avatar apologist. And to a lesser degree, a Hulk apologist as well. I've been known to criticize Titanic, but I still think is a very impressive technical achievement.

Matrix Revolutions is mind-blowingly horrible, and I'm like the only person in the world that thinks Reloaded is better than the first one. That Trinity death scene might be the most painfully on-the-nose and drawn out death scene ever committed to film. It needed a laugh track.

I do think it's highly probably I'll go my entire life without seeing Transformers 2, unless I'm feeling particularly drunk and masochistic one day and want to make it a double feature with the Star Wars Holiday Special.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at May 19, 2011 3:43 PM

This site has really gone to shit. The concept of this post is fine, but the content is even more hackney and cliched than the movies being insulted.

Posted by: Though at May 19, 2011 3:47 PM

I was young enough and in love with Leo more than enough to love Titanic, but by time I had the option of seeing the others on this list, I had progressed to the point of either ignoring them or hating them while being forced to watch.

Posted by: SaBrina at May 19, 2011 3:51 PM

What's this "Matrix, Revolutions?" It's as if they made some crappy sequel to the Matrix movie, and that's just crazy talk.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at May 19, 2011 3:57 PM

Hulk had a particular action sequence that I enjoyed, where he catches a missile in mid-air, bites the warhead off of it, and spits it back at a tank. I want to say he hits a helicopter with a tank at some point too. That motion comic for a final battle is a bit disappointing though.

Yeah Through, and the trolls have really gone to shit too. I remember when internet trolls were at least entertaining.

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at May 19, 2011 4:02 PM

I never got the Titanic love either. I worked with someone who went to see it FIFTEEN times! As Dave Barry used to say, "I'm not making that up."
She had a serious jones for DiCaprio.
I fell asleep during Matrix Revolutions,gahhh!

Posted by: TheBlackMenace at May 19, 2011 4:04 PM

Avatar should be #1 by a million miles. I'm just glad I didn't waste my money on seeing it in the theaters. I can't believe 3-D could have saved that snoozefest.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at May 19, 2011 4:31 PM

I also have some lingering love for Titanic. Not, b/c it is necessarily a good movie. But, because I was a 13 year old romantic wee little lass when it came out. I think I saw it 4 times in the theater. Now clearly, I see all the criticisms as an adult. But I still hold a little nostalgic love for that one.
As for the rest, I agree.

Posted by: Nimue at May 19, 2011 4:36 PM

"A long, bloated, empty slog, and one of the least pleasant experiences I’ve ever head in a movie theater."

Weren't you the guy who drew the short straw and reviewed Aeon Flux?

Posted by: The Wanderer at May 19, 2011 4:44 PM

I only disagree with Avatar. A simple story is not automatically a boring story. The story is told exceptionally well and the performances are engaging. The only way I see a disconnect happening is if you roll your eyes and say "blue cat people" and/or "Titanic director" every time the Na'vi appear on screen.

Posted by: Robert at May 19, 2011 5:02 PM

I agree with all the choices on the list but shouldn't someone have proofread this first? Btw, Pirates 4 would definitely take it's place as number 8 on this list. It was dreadful.

Posted by: Whitney at May 19, 2011 5:04 PM

I fell asleep during DA VINCI CODE. So dark the con of man.

Posted by: junierizzle at May 19, 2011 5:10 PM

I stopped reading after "I...enjoy the Bad Boys films."

Posted by: Case at May 19, 2011 5:13 PM

I used to love Titanic when it came out, but I think it was a teenager thing. But the thing is, one of my friends pointed out how often that Jack and Rose say each others names and now that is all I can hear when I tried to rewatch it.

Posted by: Alli at May 19, 2011 5:14 PM

DarthCorleone, that's exactly my problem with James Cameron. He went from "makes a great movie" to "impressive technical achievement".

Posted by: Three-nineteen at May 19, 2011 5:16 PM

"Ang Lee transformed HULK SMASH into HULK NAP."

Good one. :-)

Posted by: John W at May 19, 2011 5:29 PM

But truly, DarthCorleone, I think that any or all of the films on this list would stand as justification for that well-reasoned attitude.

Somehow I have managed to avoid every single one of these films.

Well, mostly by avoiding major chain movie theaters for the last fifteen years, if we're being honest.

Posted by: Jerry at May 19, 2011 5:31 PM

I liked Titanic for the pretty. It was SO PRETTY with all the minute details and the breathtaking costumes and the Kate Winslet. I think visually it was more impressive than Avatar, which just bugged the shit out of me for how dumb it was.

Posted by: Figgy at May 19, 2011 5:38 PM

Seeing Avatar with all the IMAX and an extra dimension did make it very watchable. When I caught it on HBO the other day it was craptastically boring.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at May 19, 2011 5:41 PM

Matrix:Rev might as well of been called Matrix: Let's Try and Tie Up Loose Ends and Make It All Work...Sorta...Hey, Neo's Jesus!?!

It was nothing but a exercise in banality.

I loved Matrix and Reloaded at least had Belluci and Merovingian in it.

Posted by: gunnertec at May 19, 2011 5:42 PM

Agreed, gunnertec. I love The Matrix (original flavor) unashamedly. The Matrix: Reloaded was something of a letdown, in not being fantastic. But it had Bellucci and the Merovingian, and the freeway scene. The freeway scene was awesome as the logical extension of the first one: "You think it's cool that you can move really fast, and fly? Check out the freeway; shit gets really crazy!"

Revolutions just seemed dull, pointless and unsatisfying.

Posted by: MM at May 19, 2011 5:58 PM

Three-nineteen >> Fair enough. I just don't think whatever diminishment in his cinematic storytelling ability that you or I might think has occurred (and, again, I liked Avatar on that level) is enough to dismiss his work as boring. If there is cool craftsmanship going on in any individual aspect of a film, I can enjoy watching it for that and perhaps even forgive some of its failings. Of course, some movies are so bad that no single positive element can save them. (See Transformers 2, or don't, since I haven't.)

Jerry >> Which attitude?

Posted by: DarthCorleone at May 19, 2011 5:59 PM

Too bad this was not a top 10 (or bottom 10) list, because I think it would also include:
Superman Returns
King Kong (The Jack Black version)
War of the Worlds (Tom Cruise version)
Any Mission Impossible movie

Posted by: Samantha at May 19, 2011 6:30 PM

Too bad this was not a top 10 (or bottom 10) list, because I think it would also include:
Superman Returns
King Kong (The Jack Black version)
War of the Worlds (Tom Cruise version)
Any Mission Impossible movie

Posted by: Samantha at May 19, 2011 6:31 PM

the official end of any obligation I ever felt to be "in the know"

That one. The good one.

Posted by: Jerry at May 19, 2011 6:32 PM

Jerry >> Ah. Now I see the connect with your next sentence. Ha ha. Thanks.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at May 19, 2011 6:44 PM

How did G I Joe not make this list? I'm pretty sure it made at least 150 mil and was ridiculously stupid and boring and I could have slept through it except I can't fall asleep in public movie theatres.

Posted by: Ashley at May 19, 2011 7:25 PM

Too bad Starship Troopers was a November open. Outside of all the nakedness, there was nothing there to care about.

Posted by: Jerry at May 19, 2011 8:14 PM

I couldn't have said it better myself about Transformers -- or with a lack of expletives. There were so many questions raised by Transformers 2, the biggest being: why didn't Sam just revive Optimus Prime with that sliver of The Cube? There was a huge scene about it in the beginning, they handled it with tweezers throughout the entire movie, so you know it was still powerful. Why. WHY. WHY?!

I instantly nerdrage when John Turturro says, "Let's not get episodic, okay, old-timer? Beginning, middle, end. Facts, details. Condense. Plot. Tell it!" If the audience can't have it, you won't have it, either, John Turturro!

Posted by: duckandcover at May 19, 2011 8:27 PM

Avatar being a National Geographic special on Pandora is precisely the reason I was so entertained by it. I love sci-fi on other worlds and to see one so breathtakingly beautiful was awesome.

Posted by: Larold at May 19, 2011 8:33 PM

That certainly explains why I've never seen the Titanic in its entirety. All this time I thought I was just too busy.

As for Pirates, why wait 'til the second installment? I couldn't finish the first one without yawning. My god, fight/sail/fight/sail/fight/sail. How bout one of each and move the fuck on!?!?

Still, gotta say I agree with apologists for The Hulk. I liked the darkness of it. I liked watching Nick Nolte getting all wack! That was some good fun.

Posted by: Johnnyboy at May 19, 2011 9:34 PM

Whatever guys. I've said it once and I'll say it again: Titanic is the best comedy of the 90s.

It cracks me up every time.

Posted by: adam at May 19, 2011 11:28 PM

I'll argue the Pirates films were not so much dull as an incomprehensible morass of crosses, double crosses, triple crosses , stupid arbitrarily applied rules, who-the-fuck-is-fighting-who-and-why-and-ohforgetitIjustgiveup. I was charmed by the first one against my will, why they chose to fuck up a perfectly simple, fun scenario by stuffing it with superfluous bullshit is beyond me. I have argued elsewhere the two Matrix sequels could have been mashed into a single interesting film, but the actual result was an exercise in artificial trilogy creation.

Throw 2012 onto the pile of shame, never has the apocalypse made me so sleepy. The only reaction it inspired was "huh???!" as the camera was focussing of brave poodle scrambling to safety while thousands of people plummeted to their deaths off the edge of Mt Everest. The other 5 billion+ deaths didn't quite make it into shot.

Posted by: Dave Shepherd at May 19, 2011 11:43 PM

And this is why we love Pajiba. Next time I'm recommending this site to someone, I'm going to use this article to do so.

Posted by: Steve at May 19, 2011 11:58 PM

i read the Hulk apologists, but i still don't understand their reasoning.

dark? if by that you mean "poor lighting" for many of the scenes, then yes. Eric Bana with a 5 o'clock shadow doesn't = "dark." Ed Norton's take on the role is infinitely better,m as he actually captures the dread that Banner feels about turning into the Hulk AND his desperation at using his intellect to find a "cure" so he can just be normal.

Nick Nolte's transformation into an energy monster is asinine and completely denies the claim that Ang Lee was making a "horror" movie. Nolte's over-the-top performance perfectly exemplifies the silliness that most super-hero movies fall victim too. Stan Lee would be proud of such scene-chewing.

and the MAIN character (the HULK) is so poorly conceived that it's impossible to stay focused during any scene that CGI clusterf#ck appears. how can a movie be judged anything other than a disaster when the audience can't enjoy scenes which include the title character??

Ang Lee may be a great director. Hulk is a HORRIBLE movie. The Incredible Hulk is better in every way. better cast, better plot, better execution.

Posted by: Roger Ebert's missing jawline at May 20, 2011 12:02 AM

Titanic and Avatar were fantastic to watch for the first time! I completely lost myself in both films. They're not movies I'll watch over and over again like Akira and Heat, but they were captivating and moving.

Posted by: James at May 20, 2011 12:44 AM

Nobody has mentioned the Star Wars Prequels, I think they'd have to be the most boring experiences I've ever had in the theater. That, and the tell you the truth, "Saving Private Ryan" also bored me quite a bit, though that might not qualify as blockbuster.

Posted by: Benjamin at May 20, 2011 1:12 AM

I am also am an Ang Lee hulk apologist. I do know that the plot goes bug nuts at the end, and parts of it can be a bit boring, but god damn do I like that scene where hulk is leaping through the desert.

Posted by: Benjamin at May 20, 2011 1:17 AM

I rented Transformers 2 a while ago thinking I could breeze through it in no time by just fastforwarding through all the non-action parts. Turns out all the action parts were garbage anyway, so I was done before I knew it.

And I wouldn't call myself an Ang Lee Hulk apologist, but I'm pretty sure I do like the movie. The twenty-minute long action scene in the middle is far better than anything Ed Norton's Hulk had, and I would do unconscionable things if I thought they might impress Jennifer Connelly. It's pretty silly, especially when Hulk has to fight super-Poodles and then his Lake Dad, but I can still sit down and watch that thing.

Posted by: Jim at May 20, 2011 3:45 AM

I agree with all of these but I'd put every last Fast and Furious movie in too. I've only seen one and it was the dumbest fucking thing I've ever watched, and I don't need to see the other ones to know they suck worse. I'll take the two ghetto Transformers acting out Shakespeare before I watch another F&F.

Posted by: Kris at May 20, 2011 4:00 AM

I don´t get the hate for Hulk. I´ve watched and enjoyed it multiple times, especially the editing. In fact, I prefer it to any Spiderman movie and the Edward Norton Hulk as well.

I also found Avatar pretty damn entertaining.

Posted by: Qualtinger at May 20, 2011 6:51 AM

I thoroughly enjoyed the first, second, and fourth "Pirates" movies. The third was unbelievably disappointing and dull.

Yeah, I said it. I make no apologies.

Posted by: Jana Jerusalem at May 20, 2011 1:45 PM

You are wrong about the second Pirates movie, and I will tell you why. Because scruffy, down-on-his-luck Norrington is eleventy-billion times hotter than Johnny Depp and Orlando Bloom put together. Never mind the fact that he is clearly more of man than either of them, as he is capable of growing an actual beard, and manfully giving up (and dying for) the woman he loves instead of poncing about and/or whining about his life.

The third movie is clearly the worst, because they killed him off.

SO THERE.

Posted by: Samantha at May 20, 2011 4:46 PM

Posted by: Samantha at May 20, 2011 4:49 PM

Blech...POTC: Dead Man's Chest was so boring I slept through most of the second half, and it was fucking loud.

Posted by: baboocole at May 20, 2011 4:57 PM

you forgot tron legacy

Posted by: Josh at May 20, 2011 6:36 PM

Non-intelligent action flicks tend to bore the ass off me anyway, so it's no surprise I haven't seen a single one of those.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at May 20, 2011 6:52 PM

So, Roger Ebert's missing jawline, let me get this straight. In a comic book movie, some fantasy concepts (Nolte's energy monster) are just off-the-wall ridiculous but others (a guy who explodes green) are not ridiculous? Have I got it? Cuz, if so, you have no logic in addition to poor judgment in your choice of online names.

The two hulks were virtually indistinguishable in terms of CGI quality. And the 2008 Norton film was banal and formulaic--two adjectives nobody would apply to the 2003 version.

Posted by: Johnnyboy at May 20, 2011 9:04 PM

Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring. Dear God, that was torture. Walk/talk/fight. Talk/fight/walk. Walk/walk/fight/walk/talk. Dear God, Andy Warhol's Sleep moved faster than that movie!

Posted by: JennieHaniver at May 21, 2011 4:42 AM

@Sarah, you are NOT the only one who despised Titanic. It looked boring so I steadfastly refused to see it in the theater, but due to a bad breakup, I ended up watching it on a Saturday night when it came on HBO.
That stupid boat hit the iceberg at 9:15 and it wasn't until around 11 that the guy finally drowned!

Posted by: Carolina Girl at May 21, 2011 7:33 PM

Let me begin by saying I am a huge Lord of the Rings fan. So much so that I ran a forum/website for 4 or 5 years during the making and release of all three films, flew to Toronto for the Gathering, am named in the credits of the first film because I joined the fan club and have my one and only IMDB credit as supplying artwork for the Ringers documentary. Hell, I own Glamdring! That being said, the third film in that franchise was gawdawful in many places, though I will also say that the parts I find transcendent are also often the parts others hate with a passion. Like the feeling that the movie has two or three false endings. I do not think the films deserved the awards they received, yet am still glad they did. I point this out merely as a way of saying even rabid fans can and should have some perspective. If it's your favorite film because you creamed your first jeans over Leo in Titanic, or if you loved Transformers because you had your first chubby watching Saturday morning cartoons; own up to that and get on with what make real movies special as a whole, as a work, as art, not how they're special to you, personally.

Anywheres...

I liked Avatar in the theaters. Less so on cable, but still don't understand the hate and derision it receives.

Same with Titanic, actually, though I would say I liked it less than Avatar.

The Hulk was a huge disappointment for me as I was hoping for some of that magic Lee brought to Crouching Tiger. Seriously, people were flying and I went with it. That's how good he seemed to me.

DaVinci Code? Good book, dull movie, blockbuster? Strictly numerically or statistically speaking it might have been considered a blockbuster, but I can't imagine why it's even on a list like this and some others who were much, much worse were left off - like 2012, Day After Tomorrow, Pearl Harbor, to name a few.

Transformers suck. Always have, always will, even as cartoons. The only thing that didn't suck were the toys all that crap was made to sell.

PotC 2 was simply overblown and stupid with a few pieces bright enough to hold it together long enough to make me hate it for doing so. Of all the things I despise in these types of films (outrunning explosions, tidal waves, giant animals, bla bla), the spinning wheel of fortune/death scenes were just too damn horrible to go on with. Not to mention the Whirlpool of Retarded Physics Gone Wrong that made the end.

Top of my list is definitely the last Matrix. Is that Revolutions? Because I hate it too much to even care. Screw the Marovingian and what's-her-tits, their re-hash scenes which played more like internet parodies of themselves. Screw Jesus Neo and his blind sacrifice for nothing and the pablum hokey religious everthangs-gonna-be-alright-ending. Screw that little Indian girl right in her ear! The plot and character problems brought from 1 to 2 were multiplied exponentially with 3. What the hell were they fighting about? Agent Smith as a rogue program? Machines needing humans as much as we need them therefore we have to resolve our differences but only if we can kill you to do it? No, forget it. I don't give a fuck. At all. It was like waking up on Christmas morning to find Santa raping gramma under the tree and then being told that this is the real meaning of Christmas. Piece of shit.

Posted by: Protoguy at May 22, 2011 1:24 AM

It may be blasphemy to knock Robert Downey Jr on here, but Iron Man 2 sucked a big one every bit as much as Transformers 2. Maybe even more because my expectations were higher.

So, has anyone seen the new PoC?

Posted by: James S at May 22, 2011 7:59 PM

I would say the new Clash of the Titans. Actually, I will say the new Clash of the Titans. It was so monumentally, pointlessly, tediously, butt-numbingly, fist-bitingly, agonisingly, dickishly wanktastic. Just another soulless attempt to flog some more epic-quest-with-lots-of you-must-do-this-and-slay-the-magic-donkey-to-obtain-his-enchanted-bollock-hair-dialogue-type-thing. It blew so much disfigured dick.

Posted by: Christopher at May 23, 2011 6:15 AM