web
counter
 

The Vow Review: Dear Rachel McAdams: Please Stop It. Stop It Right Now

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (54)



The-Vow-Rachel-McAdams-and-Channing-Tatum.jpg

Dear Rachel McAdams —

You are amazing. You are an actress with endless talent. You have a smile that could kill a supervillain, a face that could light up an Alaskan winter, and a presence so captivating you could walk into a crowded room and be arrested for false imprisonment. You are one of the most radiant, beautiful, charming actresses in Hollywood.

Stop using it for evil.

What kind of criminal sociopath do you have for an agent? Why do you insist on wasting all of that divine talent to be a Nicholas Sparks groupie? What kind of cruel, abusive step-mother raised you and told you that you’d never amount to more than the poster girl for emotional manipulation porn? Where is your self-esteem, woman? You and Gosling, you had it all. You made a crappy movie that the masses swallowed right along with their goddamn tissues and pride, and Gosling harnessed all that power for good. He went one way, and you started turning tricks for shitty romance novelists. I love Michelle Williams, and Jennifer Lawrence, and Carey Mulligan, but listen to me, McAdams, and listen to me hard: You can be better. Because you posses the power of achy vulnerability, the ability to break souls in half with a simple glance.

And you use it for this? The Vow? Some bullshit little knock-off of Regarding Henry opposite Charming Potato? Rachel, Rachel, Rachel. Come on! Fly McSpud seems like a terrific guy, even if he does look like a tube of toothpaste shat out a head with a nice smile. But he’s poison, lady. He’s like the love child of Keanu Reeves and Dwayne Johnson, with half the charm and twice the wood: Sure, the awww shucks thing is cute, but the man couldn’t act his way through wet tissue paper. He’s like a deadly sponge that absorbs beauty and charm; like a rubber room where talent goes to bounce around in its straight jacket. He’s a meathead; yes, he may be an adorable meat head, but let him do what he does best — kick things and break dance — and you can do what you do best, which is to stop traffic with a goddamn wink.

And this movie? Holy sh*t, woman. If someone ate a box of Hallmark cards, puked them up, and smeared them all over film reel, The Vow would be the result. The director doesn’t even know how to manipulate properly. It’s like sticking an adorable kitten inside of a dead fish. People have had bowel movements more romantic than The Vow.

Here’s the Cliff Notes version: A free spirited, liberal artist vegan falls in love with a musician. They get married. They get in a car accident. The free spirit loses all memory of the past five years. Her brain resets to back when she was in law school, back when she ate meat, lived in the suburbs, and straightened her hair every morning, before she ditched her parents because they were conservative douchebags, and before she left her fiance because he was a smarmy tool shed. In that time, however, the douchebags and the tool’s shed never changed, so she easily fell back into her old life, forgetting why it was she left in the first place. The people in her old life were given another opportunity to fuck up, while the musician husband — who is now a stranger — is left to make this prissy woman with a stick up her ass not only find herself again, but fall in love with him all over.

Guess how it ends? If you said, “She marries her old boyfriend and lives happily ever after with her dickhead parents,” you win a special helmet because you’re an idiot.

Look, Rachel: You’re sweet and lovely and you should be in ALL the movies, but not this one. When you initially read the screenplay, and there was a scene in it in which your male co-star farts in the car, and you roll up the window as a romantic gesture (for real, people), that’s the moment you should’ve tossed the script in the fire and moved on to something more worthy of your talents. You can do better than The Vow, because The Vow is a butt-stupid film with all the romantic possibilities of asbestos exposure.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Long National Nightmare Continues, Lionsgate Hints At More Twilight | Watch Gillian Jacobs Kiss Keira Knightley in the Trailer for Seeking a Friend at the End of the World









Comments

According to Yahoo news, and we all know how credible and straight-up they are, the story is based on real life, which makes me not want to see it even more.

My deep, sincere adult love for Rachel makes me want to punch a baby sloth at the idea of her doing a bitch version of 50 First Dates.

Posted by: Protoguy at February 10, 2012 2:54 PM

I had the exact same reaction as your headline, Dustin, when I saw the trailer earlier this week for the first time.

She'll always have a free pass after "Slings and Arrows," but I can't not be disappointed whenever Rachel McAdams appears in this amount of slop. Le sigh.

Posted by: RobP at February 10, 2012 2:56 PM

My husband would totally think it would be awesome if I rolled up the window when he farted in all honesty.

Posted by: daria at February 10, 2012 3:05 PM

I never want anyone to love me so much that she purposely hotboxes herself. That . . . that's just wrong.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at February 10, 2012 3:07 PM

Tracer...wanna stop down to Wilmington and pick me up? Looks like I'm gonna need someone to drive me down to North Carolina so I can punch Nicholas Sparks in his vagina. The frustration at his saccarine offerings is blinding to the point that I can't operate a vehicle.

Posted by: PissBoy at February 10, 2012 3:19 PM

you started turning tricks for shitty romance novelists

Best. Line. Ever.

I too love Rachael McAdams disproportionately to her actual oeuvre, and so, so desperately want her to do better. At least she gets to go home to Michael Sheen. (Bitch.)

Posted by: MM at February 10, 2012 3:21 PM

Dustin schnookums, you're back!

Oh, we've missed you so much! We feared the Pod People had captured you and secretly replaced you with a doppelgänger made of estrogen, kittens, rainbows and Folgers Crystals for the last few weeks hoping Pajiba Nation wouldn't notice the difference. It seems obvious now that you finally chewed through your restraints and frantically made your way back from Stockholm....Maine.

And damn skippy have you returned with a vengeance! A salvo barrage such as this has not had the likes seen since the Battle of the Philippine Sea aka the Great Marianas Turkey Shoot of 1944...and at least in that one the turkeys in question could shoot back. This cinematic turkey never stood a chance to be anything but buckshot laden meatloaf with a side of mashed potatoes.

Welcome back to old form, mon capitan. Better go get your locks changed.

Posted by: bleujayone at February 10, 2012 3:23 PM

"You have a smile that could kill a supervillain, a face that could light up an Alaskan winter, and a presence so captivating you could walk into a crowded room and be arrested for false imprisonment"

Not to mention [literally] the legs of a figure skater, and an ass that makes men recite poetry.

~~~

Posted by: Meander at February 10, 2012 3:25 PM

Posted by: bonnie at February 10, 2012 3:28 PM

Ah, the cleansing scathe of Rowles.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at February 10, 2012 3:29 PM

She... hungers...

Tatum's bones will bleach in the sun.

Posted by: Matty at February 10, 2012 3:29 PM

The real "Paige" (McAdam's character) sounds NOTHING like a free spirit (pre or post accident) in that linked story at all.

"I would love to say that I fell in love with him again because that's what everybody wants to hear," Krickitt said. "I chose to love him and that was based on obedience to God, not feelings ... "

But they are convieniently releasing another book complete with changed title "The Vow...." to coincide with the movie release with new family tidbits!

Yeeeeeeeah. Real free spirit, glad THAT part of the story was kept intact.

Posted by: layla at February 10, 2012 3:40 PM

I'm so disturbed that all I can think is "ew."

Posted by: SaBrina at February 10, 2012 3:41 PM

Sorry Dustin but she ain't all that. Average at best.

Posted by: Jen at February 10, 2012 3:41 PM

Is that Rachel McAdams?

I thought Elizabeth Banks had dyed her hair brunette.

Posted by: MRod at February 10, 2012 3:42 PM

Your metaphors are pure poetry, sir. Nuggets of burning-like-brimstone-with-scorn poetry.

Posted by: avocadolime at February 10, 2012 3:42 PM

Charming Potato's gas is a heady mix of baby powder, baked quince, and $100 bills. Bunch of fucking haters.

Posted by: Greedy at February 10, 2012 3:48 PM

Wait...the real guy's name was "Krickitt Carpenter"?

His nickname in high school was Jiminy, yeah that was awful, I'm so sorry.

Posted by: Helder at February 10, 2012 3:52 PM

My bad, the Dude's name was Kim, the woman was Krickitt...that is somehow worse.

Posted by: Helder at February 10, 2012 3:54 PM

I Vow not to see this movie.

Not on Valentine's Day.

Not on Groundhog Day.

Not on Christmas Day

Not on Watch This Movie Or Get A Shotgun Blast To Your Pee Hole Day.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at February 10, 2012 3:58 PM

...and there was a scene in it in which your male co-star farts in the car, and you roll up the window as a romantic gesture...

Now that's what I call true love.

Posted by: haplo at February 10, 2012 3:58 PM

They're couple name is "Kiminy Krickitt."

I used to LOVE Rachel McAdams for all the reasons Dustin states, but all the bad career choices has killed it. I would no longer roll up the car window if she farted.

Posted by: jimbob at February 10, 2012 4:02 PM

You cares if it's an original story? That makes it worth commiting to film? I have a story that involves a Datsun, a pool hall, a true love, a resturant and a kick in the damn nuts, but I'm not asking anyone to film it. There are thousands of stories in the naked city, but most of them should just be on Lifetime.

Posted by: Mrcreosote at February 10, 2012 4:22 PM

-- "People have had bowel movements more romantic than The Vow."

Dustin, I had no idea you were into blimpkin porn.

Respect.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at February 10, 2012 4:23 PM

I'm just going to throw this out there, is it possible that Rachel McAdams is heading the way of Anna Farris, loads of charm, talent and heart, fuck all ability to choose or find parts deserving of that charm, talent and heart?

Posted by: catagisreading at February 10, 2012 4:26 PM

The correct term is Blumpkin L.O.V.E.

What you referenced required much lube.

Posted by: PissBoy at February 10, 2012 4:29 PM

why do you guys like rachel mcadams so much? she's terrible in every way

Posted by: mexcillent at February 10, 2012 4:37 PM

Thanks Mrcreosote, I keep hearing people talk about this movie and whenever someone says it sounds stupid they counter with the "but its a true story". How does that make it a good movie? And just because something is based on true events doesn't mean that the film version will be good.

Posted by: Alli at February 10, 2012 4:39 PM

Coz nuthin' says "Love" quite like voluntarily huffing your honey's trouser cough.

Posted by: bleujayone at February 10, 2012 4:41 PM

Oh, au contraier, Monsieur PissBoy.

Their is no romance in "blumpkins" , which are impersonal and muy sucio.

Blimpkins, though, which take ATM to a whole other kind of level, put the "roman" in romance.

Did somebody say http://instantrimshot.com/ ?

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at February 10, 2012 4:52 PM

Guess how it ends? If you said, she marries her old boyfriend and lives happily ever after with her dickhead parents, you win a special helmet because you’re an idiot.

This is why I love your fucking reviews, Rowles. This right here.

Posted by: superasente at February 10, 2012 5:01 PM

I don't knoww, have we considered the possibility that maybe Rachel is the one doing the choosing and just has incredibly crap taste?

Maybe instead of spending half a year doing some ass supporting role of spunky girlfriend to the action star, she's quite soppy and clingy herself, and gets her rocks off being soppy, clingy characters.

I don't care. She's fucking Regina George. I hear she does car commercials in Japan.

Posted by: Laurie Jaques (@lauriejaques) at February 10, 2012 5:20 PM

This is terrible...but if you read the article bonnie linked to you will learn...the real-life couple dropped on of their babies on her head, leading to temporary brain damage.

Is that more or less ironic than rain on your wedding day?

Posted by: Sara Tonin at February 10, 2012 6:22 PM

C

Posted by: magy at February 10, 2012 6:23 PM

my best friend's sister-in-law $8,190 last month. she works on the internet and drives a Audi A5 Cabriolet. All she did was get lucky and follow the information you can find here..http://zapit.nu/1t8

Posted by: mary at February 10, 2012 6:29 PM

We have been discussing this exact topic in our humble household. The consensus is - it is simply not possible that Channing Tatum was originally cast opposite McAdams. Perhaps Ryan Gosling was attached, McAdams signs on, Gosling smartly reconsiders upon final script, BUT before McAdams can run the producers throw boatloads of money at her. Her evil agent talks her into staying on. It is the only reasonable explanation for why she would have signed on to this shitfest in the first palce.

Posted by: James S at February 10, 2012 7:42 PM

I don't get the McAdams love. Elizabeth Banks often annoys me, but she's got a spark that McAdams seems desperate to replicate--but the result feels like desperate replication, and that's never good.

Posted by: Kate Nonymous at February 10, 2012 7:43 PM

Here here. I will admit to complete infatuation with the lovely and talented Ms. McAdams. Morning Glory? Yep, saw that. That movie was 100% McAdams spunk. Astronaut's Wife? Yep, saw that movie just for her. In short, I'd pay to watch her read the phone book for two hours.

Instead, she decides to slum it with Charming Potato. Oh, sweet lord no. Zero acting ability. How is this guy getting work?

Seriously? How?

Who the hell is green lighting movies with this block of wood? Why aren't these people fired?

I'd like to take Charming Potato, Taylor (does he have a pulse?) Lautner, and the Kardashians and drop them in the middle of Afghanistan. Al Qaeda would surrender in hours.

Please Rachel, choose your roles wisely. I don't know if I'm going to be able to hit the theater to see this knowing your working opposite a 2x4.

Posted by: Aerial Flynn at February 10, 2012 8:01 PM

I have to roll the windows down on my OWN farts... I'll be damned imma lock myself in a enclosed space and inhale his fumes on purpose.

Posted by: NGG at February 10, 2012 8:29 PM

Can we start a letterwriting campaign to her?

I LOVE her. She's my #1 girlcrush. But this? This hurts deep.

Posted by: figgy at February 10, 2012 9:40 PM

Fly McSpud seems like a terrific guy, even if he does look like a tube of toothpaste shat out a head with a nice smile.

You're really mixing your metaphors, Dustin. Potato or toothpaste?

And according to IMDB, this monstrosity was at least co-written by Jason Katims, who is a Rowles favorite. Now THAT'S slumming.

Posted by: Uriah Creep at February 10, 2012 10:01 PM

Good to see you have returned, Dustin.

Posted by: The Wanderer at February 11, 2012 4:11 AM

This movie sounds awful. Channing Tatum is a total butterface. It looks disgustingly romantic and of course I already know the ending. But I don't care, I want to see it and I probably will because it also kind of looks sweet.

Insert your favorite *I REGRET NOTHING* gif of choice here, and follow it with the usual *DEAL WITH IT* gif.

Posted by: Sadie at February 11, 2012 7:03 AM

I liked her mean in The Family Stone

This is one of those movies that I won't go to the cinema to see, I won't buy the DVD, I won't watch on ON Demand and I wouldn't even waste my time watching it when it hits the free movie section.

Posted by: kirbyjay at February 11, 2012 2:54 PM

Can someone explain to me where they see all this "endless talent" please? She isn't a terrible actress, and she's very pretty, but I have never seen her in anything and been blown away by her acting.

Posted by: Liz at February 11, 2012 7:54 PM

Actually, I think this is very her, and probably the one kind of project she can take do authentically. For a while there she kept getting 'sparky, resourceful, independent female sidekick' roles and played all of them like an injured Bambi that had gotten tangled in its trenchcoat.
Given that she had started showing up in films I would otherwise like and mangling parts she clearly could not play, I hope this project signals her arrival in a niche she will occupy for many, many, years.

Posted by: wwhvd at February 12, 2012 5:32 AM

Maybe, perhaps, could it be that Rachel is not being offered any other movies but these romantic crappy ones? You know these H'wood movie types tend to typecast and it's HARD to say no,even though you would like to. I mean, a girl has to eat and pay rent. Plus, these movies do make a lot of money.

I'm actually hoping Rachel has a plan for the future when she has enough money saved and she can turn these awful things down, take a break, and come back as a REAL actress; maybe in an indie movie that gets tons of praise and awards,etc. and she becomes a respected actress.

Posted by: mslewis at February 12, 2012 11:23 AM

I still can't forgive her for the horrible Time Traveler's Wife movie. I know it wasn't her fault (that script and trying to act off Eric Blank Stare Bana just stacked the deck), but I kind of wish she'd refused to do it once they changed it to that shitty fucking ending. I still love her. I do. But I shall never forget the cinematic raping of one of my all time favorite books. Ugh. I know you hated it too, Dustin.

Posted by: Kari at February 12, 2012 3:21 PM

I saw this less than 24 hours after sitting through Albert Nobbs and I gotta say ... it didn't suck. Relatively speaking.

I need Pajiba to pick my movies, not my family and friends.

Posted by: Tori at February 12, 2012 5:44 PM

Agreed on Banks.
People only seem to like her villanous roles.
She's smarter than Beckinsale, that's the truth.
She's likely still recovering from her character's beyond lame exit on Slings And Arrows.
There aren't a whole lotta people who would turn down a Vanity Fair cover, but I respect that she decided to turn it down because she wasn't willing to strip naked just because some photographer told her to. It's called free will, cast of Glee. If you were as uncomfortable as you said you were, at least pretend to show some agency. Did you think it was 'Spreading For Jesus Week' and does it matter if I just made that up?

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at February 12, 2012 6:28 PM

Wow! Thanks L.O.V.E.! I just learned something and got a new wrinkle in my brain. I wish I could put up one of those "The more you know..." rainbos things. Except it would be in shades of brown.

Blumpkin = lust.

Blimpkin = LOVE

(no pun intended)

Posted by: PissBoy at February 13, 2012 8:35 AM

I took one for the team. I took the Mrs. to see the Vow (and to see Ms. McAdams).

There are no words to describe this pain.

First, the writing is awful. If it had been written by a 12 year old, that would have been a substantial improvement. This is Lifetime Channel writing at best.

Then it gets worse.

The crux of this problem is that since the lovely Ms. McAdams has lost her memory and is a relative blank slate, so the emotion has to be carried by Charming Potato.

Yes, that's right.

Ol' Spuds is required to EMOTE. Need I continue? My salt and pepper shaker have more depth than the Spud. This was one of the worst movies I've seen in a very long time and I feel genuinely ripped off.

Posted by: aerial flynn at February 15, 2012 12:34 PM

I discovered your blog site on google and check a few of your early posts. Continue to keep up the very good operate. I just additional up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Seeking forward to reading more from you later on!…

Posted by: film porno at February 16, 2012 7:37 PM

This review is spot on, you will get a kick out of this parody of "The Vow" if you agree with this review.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Sei_MEK2BI

Posted by: Joshua Berry at February 19, 2012 10:45 PM