Charles Saatchi Divorcing Nigella Lawson Because She Didn't Defend Him When He Choked Her. Wait ... what?
A few weeks ago, I didn't even realize that Nigella Lawson was married. All I knew about her was that she could cook, and that she looked damn nice doing it. Then, Saatchi allegedly choked Lawson at a restaurant, and though it seemed too bizarre to be true, the paparazzi images seem to confirm it. I gawked at those pictures for a while because I wanted to believe it was some sort of paparazzi GOTCHA, and though I don't know if he choked her hard, he clearly had his hands around her throat, and she was clearly upset about it.
Anyway, after the incident -- which Saatchi called a "playful tiff" -- Lawson moved out. Jump to three weeks later, and now Saatchi is divorcing her. Why? Because she didn't stick up for him over the choking incident.
"I feel that I have clearly been a disappointment to Nigella during the last year or so, and I am disappointed that she was advised to make no public comment to explain that I abhor violence of any kind against women, and have never abused her physically in any way."
I dunno. You can't really say you've never abused her in any way when there is photographic evidence that you've abused her in some way. Maybe Saatchi is a really good guy, who Lawson had wanted to divorce for a while, and she's using the incident as an excuse to get out. On the other hand, HE HAD HER HANDS AROUND HER NECK.
So, you know: The benefit of the doubt swings toward Nigella Lawson here. She's is, after all, a woman who has her priorities straight, which makes her infinitely trustworthy.
I think the moral of the lesson here, though, is DON'T CHOKE YOUR WIFE.
Around the Web
Like Our Facebook Page And an Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance
blog comments powered by Disqus