web
counter
 

If Only She Wasn’t Such an Insufferable Bitch

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Career Assessments | Comments (81)



paltrow5.jpg

Subject: Gwyneth Kate Paltrow, 37-year-old American actress & self-declared successor to Martha Stewart

Date of Assessment: May 7, 2010

Positive Buzzwords: (This section left intentionally blank.)

Negative Buzzwords: Insufferable, snotty, ungrateful, unremarkable

Date of Assessment: May 7, 2010

The Case: Many of you probably wouldn’t be surprised to learn that I’ve got absolutely no tolerance for Gwyneth Paltrow, who became an inexplicably successful A-list actress primarily due to nepotism (as well as strategically dating Brad Pitt). Yet, I didn’t always feel this way about her, for I actually liked Gwyneth during her early career after randomly catching Flesh and Bone at a dollar theater and finding her relatively enigmatic next to Pitt during Se7en. She also did well to make herself the focus of fairly small movies like Moonlight and Valentino and Hush (despite the latter’s horrid script), and she held her own against Michael Douglas in the lukewarm A Perfect Murder. However, I never would have categorized Gwyneth as a great actress, and it’s rather amazing that such atrocious attempts at an English accent have been repeatedly showcased in Emma, Sliding Doors, and Shakespeare in Love. Shortly after Shakespeare, however, a noticeable shift in Gwyneth’s attitude occurred, which may or may not have something to do with winning that undeserved Best Actress Oscar (for 1998’s Shakespeare role), which was essentially gifted to her at a very early age (interesting speech, btw) and seemed to unleash (or at least coincide with) Gwyneth’s inner frigid superiority goddess.

Nowadays, it’s not unexpected for a journalist to interview Mrs. Paltrow-Martin and hear all sorts of things unrelated to whatever film the bitch happens to be promoting. Just as an example, this interview with The Guardian glosses over the film in question, Proof, in favor of Gwyneth’s beliefs about how Hollywood is so bloody awful and, if it weren’t for all those drunken women in England, her adopted home would be just about perfect for her tastes. Not to mention that Americans are such uninteresting conversationalists and far too uncultured for the likes of herself, who has certainly appeared in her share of lowbrow films (like Shallow Hal and View from the Top), but that’s only because Harvey Weinstein talked her into it. In recent years, it’s no wonder that I’ve often referred to her as “GPal” due to her attitudinal (made-up word!) proximity to JLo, who uses her so-called Latina roots much in the same manner as Gwyneth when she claims to be African or some such nonsense. Lately, Gwyneth’s grown even more insufferable by labeling non-famous people as “pedestrians” and hosting charity events in order to foster a humanitarian vibe while simultaneously referring to the (invited) photographers as “roaches.” And I haven’t even broached the topic of GOOP.

Look, it’s not that Gwyneth is necessarily a bad actress, but she’s just not necessarily a good one. And that wouldn’t be so such a bad thing either — because there are many untalented actors and actresses who consistently find work — if she weren’t such an insufferable bitch about it all. Indeed, it’s now a relief that the Iron Man 2 promotional circuit has neared its end, so perhaps Gwyneth can go back to her lovely, charming faux-English life while looking down upon us all. Of course, I wouldn’t despise her quite so much if she could just shut up about everything else during promotion and, you know, focus on the movie that she’s being paid to pimp. Instead, she’s on the morning shows talking about a bizarre exercise routine and how wonderful she is to put her family over her career (as if she’s the only one to ever do so). All of this verbal diarrhea makes one wonder whether, during the filming of Two Lovers, Gwyneth might have become the secret ingredient to Joaquin Phoenix’s insanity as well as the unwitting catalyst for his decision to stop acting: “Trying to seduce Paltrow on screen may have just proved too much for him, and it’s like the weight gain, beard and the crazy are all a defense mechanism to keep her far away.” Of course, that’s really just a joke but not entirely out of the realm of possibility.

Gwyneth Paltrow is, by trade, an actress. Yet, she often (and unironically) spends much of her existence speaking of the uninspired dullness and blatantly tiresome aspects of what she believes to be the essence of us unwashed proletariat masses. Oddly enough, we’re the ones who buy movie tickets. She’d do well to shut her mouth and work on that so-called “craft” of hers instead.

Prognosis: If it weren’t for the undemanding Pepper Potts role that Gwyneth secured in the Iron Man franchise, Paltrow would have little future other than the reigning spokesperson for Estée Lauder perfumery and the occasional artsy-fartsy film. Unfortunately, it looks like we’re stuck with her for quite a while, but Robert Downey Jr. can help ease our pain just a bit.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.









Pajiba Love 05/07/10 | Iron Man 2 Review | A Thigh-Quaking Toe Curler (In an Uncomfortable Place)













Comments

What is with all the hate for this woman?? It's like hating "hipsters" and seems to just be the thing to do. She's an adequate enough actress for the roles she chooses. She blogs about jelly (i honestly don't know what Goop is, I'm just guessing here. I haven't read it because I could give a shit about her personal life) and you guys get all up in arms about.

It's not like she's going around clubbing baby seals or robbing little kids of their lollies.

As the great Riley Freeman once said: "Hey you with the afro, give it a rest!"

Posted by: Mokey at May 7, 2010 2:40 PM

I don't get the Paltrow hate either. I don't actually own a television, so maybe there's something everyone else is witnessing that I'm completely missing?

Posted by: Danielle Lilly at May 7, 2010 2:57 PM

Good stuff, Bedhead! She's a competent actress whose offscreen personality completely eradicates any real enjoyment I might get from her performances. I liken her to Tyra Banks in that her entire condescending demeanor makes me furious.

re: Mokey's comment, "What's with all the hate for this woman?"

Did you read Agent Bedhead's assessment, or are you just being obtuse? It's cool if you don't care about her personal life, but the article clearly explains why some people dislike her. By your logic, just because she isn't murdering animals or torturing children, she should be likeable? Well then, Tom Cruise is a super-likeable guy*!

I don't think it's simply her superiority complex that annoys people. It's that she's constantly flaunting it and mouthing off about it. She's a rich girl/actress cliche and a blight on my calm.

*comment subject to change if Mr. Cruise kills a puppy

Posted by: Kballs at May 7, 2010 3:00 PM

I think Ms. Bedhead made it very clear what the hate is all about. For someone born with a silver spoon tastefully wedged in her pristine rectum and basically gifted an acting career by way of her pedigree, she really is an insufferable twat.

And as the great Huey Freeman once said: "But I was telling the truth."

Posted by: admin at May 7, 2010 3:02 PM

One of the reasons I like Se7en is because her head ends up in a box.

Posted by: fenchurch at May 7, 2010 3:07 PM

ARE Paltrow's attempts at a British accent really atrocious? I wouldn't know, but I've heard from some that she's actually pretty credible at this.

Posted by: jimbobblehead at May 7, 2010 3:07 PM

You (addressed to whomever) are free to NOT hate Gwyneth Paltrow.

I reserve the right to be annoyed by her. Just as Ms. Bedhead said, she's a mostly competent although not fantastic actress and an incredibly annoying person. I still watch movies she's in. She doesn't "ruin" them for me. But God forbid I hear her talk about anything.

If you think GOOP is just about jelly, you should gather more information. Then, perhaps, you will understand the annoyance.

Posted by: MM at May 7, 2010 3:07 PM

Color me crazy, but I'm going to judge a complete strangers personality from a comment from a "rather reliable Popbitch" which is the source for her "pedestrian" comment.


/continues clubbing baby seals after stealing their lollies.


Posted by: Mokey at May 7, 2010 3:11 PM

So I'm not sure if anyone's noticed, but Gwyneth Paltrow has a long neck. And not just your ordinary run-of-the-mill long neck, either, but a giraffe neck plopped onto a regular human body. And it is because of this unusual feature that I can never hate her. You see, when I first saw Shakespeare in Love, I was an average thirteen-year-old. I was just learning to be uncomfortable about sex stuff around my parents, and I sometimes stayed home on Saturday nights to watch movies with my family. Situation: I, as a vaguely prudish pre-teen, had to watch that long, drawn-out unwrapping/sex scene with my parents and brother. Complications: Embarrassment and Awkwardness. Solutions: My dad completely diffusing the situation by spending the entire movie commenting, "Look how long her neck is!" and "Oh, there goes Gwyneth Long-Neck Paltrow!" So what should have been an emotional yet uncomfortable scene became four of us laughing at a woman's neck.
In completely unrelated news, I've been told recently by a friend that my family is pretty mean. I believe that after he met my parents his exact words were, "No wonder you have such thick skin!"

Posted by: esme at May 7, 2010 3:20 PM

I think Gwyneth Paltrow is delightful. Even if she is an uppity, well-to-do bitch who food blogs on arugula. And I thought she was great in Proof. There. I said it.

Posted by: sheshakes at May 7, 2010 3:22 PM

In the interest of full disclosure I must admit to liking her in Sliding Door for some reason, I think it has to do with her actually nailing that role, she actually pulled off a whole vulnerability and lack of actressin' that really did it for me.

Having said that, if it weren't for her last name and her English accent shtick girlfriend would be about as relevant as Wynona Ryder who is another no-trick pony. And seriously this woman has no business telling other people how to live or spewing little snippets of wisdom about ANYTHING. She gets hated on because she herself is a hater, a passive aggressive one but a hater nonetheless.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 7, 2010 3:25 PM

Wish I knew what exactly defines a Hipster, so I can know not to offend whoever hates them. They can't be as bad as hippies, can they? Are they like modern beatniks? Should I just Google this? Should I have read the whole article and not skipped to the comments? I don't know who I am!

Posted by: Johnny C. Georgie at May 7, 2010 3:26 PM

It absolutely drives me insane that no one else seems to hear that horrible lisp of hers. Or maybe it's a result of her bad English accents?

Posted by: ceejeemcbeegee at May 7, 2010 3:26 PM

I didn't know what the hell "Goop" was either, so I checked her wikipedia article. It said:

In September 2008, she launched a weekly lifestyle newsletter, Goop, encouraging readers to 'nourish the inner aspect'. The website's title is derived from the initials of her first and last names. Each week, the newsletter focuses on an action: Make, Go, Get, Do, Be, and See. It has been ridiculed by E-Online, Vanity Fair, The Independent, and the UK's Daily Mirror.

So the people who have made fun of this are an important scholarly detail. That made me laugh, and the whole thing does sound kind of douche-y.

Posted by: Todd at May 7, 2010 3:27 PM

I LOVED Proof.

That is all.

Posted by: ChristianH at May 7, 2010 3:31 PM

Bedhead, you've done it again! Spot on and fantastamic (made up word too) assessment!

Watching her acceptance speech again was really sort of frightening. That was like two minutes of word vomit on nepotism and connections. Ugh.

I totally forget she won over Emily Watson, Meryl Streep, Cate Blanchett, and Fernanda Montenegro. Cate Blanchett for Elizabeth no less! Fucking travesty.

Posted by: Lola at May 7, 2010 3:33 PM

"Wish I knew what exactly defines a Hipster,..."

Posted by: Johnny C. Georgie at May 7, 2010 3:26 PM


It's a sort of a "you it when you see it" type of thing

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 7, 2010 3:35 PM

It's a sort of a "you it when you see it" type of thing

Does that mean that if you go around calling people hipsters, you probably are a hipster?

Posted by: MM at May 7, 2010 3:42 PM

And I'll tell you another thing, SOMETHING must have happened while on Iron Man 2 'cause she's hardly in any of the TV/Cinema promos (which is weird considering she does have A-list recognition), same for other promotional materials.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 7, 2010 3:43 PM

Does that mean that if you go around calling people hipsters, you probably are a hipster?

Posted by: MM at May 7, 2010 3:42 PM
-----------------------------------------------

I guess, if you do it ironically.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 7, 2010 3:44 PM

I don't care what you say, I think she absolutely deserved the Oscar and I was incredibly happy that she won. That movie's easily in my top 5 and I don't give a crap what you say.

And, really, I don't mind Gwyneth at all. Sure she's spoiled but who in Hollywood isn't? her problem is that she has some silly little blog, but I've never looked at it because I don't give a shit. I'm able to separate the real life woman from the actress, and I mostly love her work and the movies she's done.

So, I get why people hate her, but I'll never share it. I like her as an actress and that's about it.

Posted by: figgy at May 7, 2010 3:47 PM

I've never understood judging any professional entertainer (actor, musician, comedian, etc) based on their personalities. It's a symptom of our celebrity obsessed culture and pretty disappointing to see in a site that maintains an air of being above the typical movie blog bullshit. Who cares if X actor/director/producer is a raging douche nugget? Are they good at what they get paid to do?

This article isn't so much a career assessment as it is an opportunistic chance to rage about an actress not for her talent or lack there-of, but rather for displaying personality traits that may reflect a little too close to home.

She maintains an air of superiority? She's arrogant and judgmental without possessing the talent to make those claims authoritatively? She's maybe a bit of a... scathing bitch? Shame on her!

Fact of the matter is, most of us aren't in the public eye enough to get caught in our asshole moments.

Posted by: Lennon at May 7, 2010 3:48 PM

Johnny C. Georgie:
In the 1940s-50s, where jazz swung in numerous tiny clubs across the country, it was possible, if you were very, very cool, to be dubbed a "hep cat." People like Charlie Parker, who sold their beautiful, expensive horns for drugs and then still out-played everyone else using cheap plastic instruments, were members of the fold. Being "hep" was being so cool you were a danger to yourself (just look at what happened to poor Charlie Parker!).
Then the Beat movement took off, and "hep" became "hip" -- something that was impossible to articulate, but was just an attitude. Something elusive, something to be admired. Norman Mailer, a hot-tempered young writer, got ahold of the word, and wrote "Portrait of a Hipster," in which he described what it was to be "hip." How hipsters lived on the fringes of society, never accepting the norms, seeing the world in their own way. How, because they were always on the outside of society, African Americans were to be emulated -- they were the ultimate hipsters simply because of cultural structures. People like Jack Kerouac certainly idealized the down-and out, the hoboes, the migrant workers, and the Blacks. Sal has an entire chapter on wanting to be Black in On The Road. Being a hipster was being young, idealistic, and free of social constraints or duties.
When the sixties hit, "hipster" became "hippie" as a new breed of young idealists formed. Still did they wear their titles proudly, understanding that Not Fitting In was a new culture to be explored and used to change what it meant to be American.
And then, as Pop Art took the scene, everything changed. Suddenly the old ideas of art -- of spontaneity and freedom and being outside social, normal, middlebrow understanding -- were no longer cool. Instead, there was Andy Warhol and the Soup Cans and Brillo Boxes that represented not what we appeared to be from the outside but instead what we were. Honesty over idealism, extreme realism over personal point of view. The idea of "cinema des auteurs," of personal touches by Jackson Pollock, were out. The idea, in fact, that artists were important as anything more than builders, was out. Art was about rebelling against the art of the 50s -- the intellectual, hipster art. And so "hip" was no longer cool. It was inauthentic and snobby. It catered to Virginia Woolf's "highbrow" and discounted the truth of the masses. This is the vision that persists today. "Hipster" has, in some circles, come back into vogue and is again seen as a cultural lens through which to examine society. But for the most part, it is still seen as being faux-intellectual and dismissive of what is real and mainstream.

Thanks for helping me study for my "Art and Thought of the Cold War" final! Let me know if you want extensive summaries of readings or films of the era!

Posted by: esme at May 7, 2010 3:57 PM

"I've never understood judging any professional entertainer (actor, musician, comedian, etc) based on their personalities. It's a symptom of our celebrity obsessed culture and pretty disappointing to see in a site that maintains an air of being above the typical movie blog bullshit..."

---------------------------------------


Okay, let's separate the entertainer from his/her personality. What about Roman Polanski? Greeeeat personality right there let's just forget about all that rape shit has NOTHING to do with his body of work and we are just being douchebags. And you know what? Leni Riefenstahl shouldn't be judged for being a Nazi twat, her work is amazing and inspirational, I'm putting Triumph des Willens on top of my queue.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 7, 2010 4:02 PM

a friend of mine wrote some super hilarious send-ups of gwyneth's goop shenanigans.

also, my friend's brother smoked a joint with gwyneth paltrow in the alley of a hollywood dive bar. this was right when se7en was about to come out. he said she was very cool and down to earth and normal.

too bad she done lost her mind since then.

Posted by: stopthemadness at May 7, 2010 4:03 PM

oh and in case admin didn't hear me: SHENANIGANS!!!

Posted by: stopthemadness at May 7, 2010 4:04 PM

This piece did a very good job making the case, and providing links to evidence, for why she is unlikeable. Nice to have it all in one place.

Takedowns such as this usually are much less focused and say more about the writer than the target.

IT was a sleek dossier of dislike, if you will.

Posted by: icecreammang at May 7, 2010 4:04 PM

From exposure to an interview with Paltrow (I was on a flight and the friggin touch screen on my seat didn't work properly) I came to the not so astute reasoning that she is indeed a Twat.

Posted by: peanut at May 7, 2010 4:06 PM

Aw, I love you guys.

Posted by: Johnny C. Georgie at May 7, 2010 4:12 PM

Um, to those of you who don't get the hate, didn't she just explain the hate? Reading is fundamental.

You're free to disagree, but she explained the hate.

I don't hate Gwyneth, BTW. Don't really love her, either. She's just there.

Posted by: Slash at May 7, 2010 4:25 PM

Hipsters aren't that old. They can timetravel.

http://forgetomori.com/2010/fortean/time-traveler-caught-in-museum-photo/

Posted by: superasente at May 7, 2010 4:39 PM

"I've never understood judging any professional entertainer (actor, musician, comedian, etc) based on their personalities."

She's a middling actress as best, so she doesn't offer much to offset her nonsense. We can assess Woody Allen's work apart from his creepy personal choices because, by and large, that work is highly-skilled. Gwyn? Not so much.

Posted by: samantha t at May 7, 2010 5:22 PM

I have a serious love-hate relationshp with Gwyneth Paltrow.

Unlike Agent, I think she's actually quite a good actress. I think Proof was "proof" enough of her talent...see what I did there? Honestly though, she was really good in that film as well as The Royal Tanenbaums. I think she also did a decent job in Sky Captain and The World of Tomorrow as well as Sylvia.

And yeah, View From the Top and Shallow Hal were awful. But, all things considered, she's had very few misteps when selecting films.

NOW, when looking at Gwyneth the person...yes, she's kind of vile...and yet kind of not? I don't know, even though she is kind of a loathsome snob she's also not afraid to be a little silly and act dumb(See Jimmy Fallon). Goop is completely insufferable yet she's very open about what kind of person she is, ya know? I mean, she's not fronting like she's some sweet, down to earth, salt of the earth person and she's not hiding the fact that she's a supreme bitch.

Let's put it this way. In the episode of The Office where Michael tries to show the dangers of depression in the workplace by staging a suicide attempt Oscar (in one of his best scenes ever) says, "Michael it takes a lot of courage to be you. To just get up and be yourself in the morning takes courage." That's how I feel about Gwyneth, it takes a lot of courage to be the snotty, pretentious, insufferable bitch that she is.

Posted by: citizen_cris at May 7, 2010 5:30 PM

Okay, let's separate the entertainer from his/her personality. What about Roman Polanski? Greeeeat personality right there let's just forget about all that rape shit has NOTHING to do with his body of work and we are just being douchebags. And you know what? Leni Riefenstahl shouldn't be judged for being a Nazi twat, her work is amazing and inspirational, I'm putting Triumph des Willens on top of my queue.

-------------


Well, people did separate the work didn't they when he won an oscar for The Pianist and it was lauded all over the place? My personal distaste for the man didn't stop me from thinking "Wow, great film". Anyway, I enjoy reading these career assesments but this isn't one, it's a character assassination, barely a word on her actual career. It's a bit like bitching about the most popular girl in school when you secretly want to be her best friend.

Posted by: wildflower at May 7, 2010 5:32 PM

I also have to point out that falling in with the wrong crowd damaged her beyond repair. In interviews prior to her friendships with known bitches such as Madonna, Victoria Beckham, etc Gwyneth seemed like a nice enough person who couldn't give a shit about acai juice berry soy protein smoothies with probiotic cultures or whatever the fuck it is she drinks.

I partly blame the move to England and her little posse.

Posted by: citizen_cris at May 7, 2010 5:32 PM

for me, she's a correct actress(OK,not in the Iron Man movies) but she's really a nice actress (or her character is interesting!?)in "2 lovers"...
Ok, she didn't deserved her Oscar but Sandra Bullock no more
OK, she seems pretty snub but...no she looks snub!

i don't care how the actors,musicians,directors ...are in real life as i don't care how my butcher or doctor is!!
i didn't think "Wolverine" is a good movie because Jackman looks nice or "iron man 2" is great(it's just OK) because there is RDJ

Posted by: caro at May 7, 2010 5:45 PM

I reckon her movies are alright. Bad PR springs to mind every time I am exposed to her outside the relm of the big screen. She married a wanker and named her children Apple and Moses. That's good for her, but her agent should have turned around and told her to keep quiet imbetween jobs and her kids should enroll in high school under different names (we had an Apple in my school and it did her no good). I am sure Madonna and Skeletor Spice were also a bad influence. Who'd have thought that a Quaker and Jew could produce such a hot chick?

Posted by: bob at May 7, 2010 5:50 PM

I like Paltrow as an actress, as a person she seems insufferable. However, she somehow beat Cate Blanchett in the Best Actress race and Blanchett was nom'd for "Elizabeth" and that's just fucking insane. But I also hold "Elizabeth" was the best movie and should have trounced "Shakespeare in Love". I liked "Shakespeare" but "Elizabeth" is fucking outstanding. And yes, better than "Saving Private Ryan" of the same year.

Posted by: TylerDFC at May 7, 2010 5:50 PM

Okay, let's separate the entertainer from his/her personality. What about Roman Polanski? Greeeeat personality right there let's just forget about all that rape shit has NOTHING to do with his body of work and we are just being douchebags. And you know what? Leni Riefenstahl shouldn't be judged for being a Nazi twat, her work is amazing and inspirational, I'm putting Triumph des Willens on top of my queue.

I expected someone to say something about Polanski, so here's my stock response. Referencing Roman Polanski is the movie equivalent of the "reducio ad Hitlerum" tactic commonly employed in internet arguments (though, you did also brush the actual thing by referencing Nazis as well). This is to say, you're hoping the shock of the severe nature of his crime will prevent me from arguing with you, for fear of looking like I'm defending Nazis... or in this case condoning rape as ok as long as the rapist happens to make some incredible movies.

However, in doing a career assessment, one should concentrate on the career. It's totally fair to bring up someones ridiculous arrogance if it affects their work...

IE, "Paltrow became such an arrogant bitch after winning an Oscar that she felt she could simply float by without constantly pushing her talent. This has led to stagnation of roll choices and gives her a rather flat and unengaging screen presence. If she continues to believe herself above reproach and refuses to push herself, we can expect little more from her than a squandering of her promise on the occasional self important art house roll"

But this wasnt how the article was framed. Not even a little bit. Agent Bedhead was the one that separated her personality from her work (not me) and then judged her career on that personality while almost entirely ignoring her career trajectory.

TL;DR summary: Nice try and thanks for playing.

Posted by: Lennon at May 7, 2010 6:10 PM

2 points

1. Gwenyth Paltrow is a twat. That doesn't play into my view of her career in anyway. That being said, her career is lackluster and unimportant to almost everyone.

2. Your on this site, you're probably a hipster. It's the most generalized word in the english slang right now and I wanna slap people who use it. I mean the closest you can come to a definition is 'people who like stuff...and look that that one guy you met.' Thats brilliantly intelligent. I mean Esme had about the best definition you'll find. and even that doesn't really say anything, other than Andy Warhol is pretentious. Quit saying it or at least make sure you're aren't the definition before you do.

Posted by: Blank at May 7, 2010 6:19 PM

In the episode of The Office where Michael tries to show the dangers of depression in the workplace by staging a suicide attempt Oscar (in one of his best scenes ever) says, "Michael it takes a lot of courage to be you. To just get up and be yourself in the morning takes courage."

Pretty sure that was Daryl.

Posted by: Todd at May 7, 2010 6:23 PM

Lennon: I don't think she has much of a career trajectory to begin with.

I'm gonna Slim my argument down to simple terms, without going all "Hitler E pluribus unum":

Being a movie star/artist etc implies privileges concessions and perks that are facilitated by my (and others) hard earned money. So guess what, if I think you are an asshole you are not getting my money and I don't care if you are the second coming of Orson Welles.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 7, 2010 6:27 PM

I also like her as an actress, shakespeare,sliding doors, that one with michael douglas, proof, etc. i think she's flat out good. and i,too,thought she did a convincing brittish accent???? and i loved S in Love.
There.I said it, too.
I have been saying how much I wish she could have stuck to her movies and focused on acting-instead of befriending madonna nad becoming some kind of pseudo self help guru. argh with these actors branching out already!!!!
btw, i don't think blanchett's american accent was very good in that one with john cusak,and countless aussies have failed miserably at the same. however, winslett was unbelievably amazing in Eternal Sunshine. So, as accents go, I'd put Goopy in the upper end somewhere. RDJ did pretty well in sherlock holmes, I might add.

Posted by: sdcs at May 7, 2010 6:28 PM

Being a movie star/artist etc implies privileges concessions and perks that are facilitated by my (and others) hard earned money. So guess what, if I think you are an asshole you are not getting my money and I don't care if you are the second coming of Orson Welles.

I cant imagine that you watch many movies if you only watch those that aren't directed, acted or produced by assholes ;-)

Posted by: Lennon at May 7, 2010 6:36 PM

There's more than one way to watch a movie. :)

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 7, 2010 6:44 PM

But where to draw the line?
Director is an asshole or a rapist. Don't see their movies.
Star of movie is an asshole. Don't see it.
Supporting actor is an asshole .... hmmm.
person with a small but important cameo is an asshole ...
Key grip is an asshole, with a swastika tattoo no less ...

Posted by: Pat C at May 7, 2010 6:58 PM

I thought I was going to be one of the few dissenting opinions, but there seems to be quite a bit of that in this thread. That's good. It saves me the typing. I think she's a good actress, and I couldn't care less about these elements of her personality and background that seem to bother other people.

This falls under the schism of "separating the art from the artist," which seems to be an especially difficult thing to do when it comes actors. Perhaps it's a bit of a double standard for me to like certain actors more because I think they do seem personally cool and would like to see that rewarded, but if I started nitpicking over every little thing that actors say in their real lives that I didn't like, my movie fandom would become mighty disillusioning mighty quickly.

There isn't a single prominent actor that I do know personally and that includes the ones that I think seem like wonderful people. I'll leave it to the people that actually interact with them to make any sort of personal assessment and let the big screen - the true extent of my relationship with them - do the talking.

I'm reminded of Charles Barkley's old "I am not a role model" commercial that stirred up so much controversy. It's always better and admirable when these high-profile folks behave in a manner that is worthy of emulation, but it's just silly to expect it.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at May 7, 2010 7:02 PM

It's a sort of a "you it when you see it" type of thing.

like obscenity and porn.

Posted by: stopthemadness at May 7, 2010 7:20 PM

Well put, DarthColrleone.
I'm more aware of the failings of people in the field of music. But I still enjoy Phil Spector and Spade Cooley records, even though I find their actions in life despicable.

Posted by: Pat at May 7, 2010 7:25 PM

Argh, Todd you're right. It was Darryl. But Oscar is still rpetty awesome.

Posted by: citizen_cris at May 7, 2010 8:09 PM

She's good in films where nothing much is expected from her. My favorite Paltrow performance? Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow. I rest my case.

Posted by: Robert at May 7, 2010 8:10 PM

This has been an EXTREMELY revealing thread I had no idea Pajiba had so many Paltrow apologists. You need to add a GOOP link, Rowles.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 7, 2010 8:39 PM

Since I don't care about what kind of a raging beeyatch she may be, I'll limit my opinions to her on-screen life.

I can't think of the last movie where I thought "Oh, Gwyneth Paltrow is in this? All right!" I can't think of any movie that I've gone to see because of her or where I've come out thinking that her performance made a movie. And I don't think the number of people going to see Iron Man 2 for her role will be high.

For me, she falls in the same range as Jennifer Aniston: pretty actresses that don't seem to make anything interesting. She's not bad, don't get me wrong. But can anyone tell me what she's doing next that should make me intrigued about her going forward?

Posted by: Fredo at May 7, 2010 8:49 PM

Remember when she was awarding Anthony Hopkins the lifetime acheivement award at some awards show, and she kept pronouncing his name wrong. I dont know if anybody saw that or remembers that but it drove me fucking insane whenever she said his name in he horrible english ancsent. She is a worthless cunt.

Posted by: Tony at May 7, 2010 9:07 PM

Here's a litmus test: I bet you you can't come up with a single role where you can say "this is a Paltrow character" Keep in mind that there are roles where right off the bat one has a particular actress for it, be it, Blanchett, Denning, Portman, Rodriguez etc. Paltrow doesn't register on those radars any longer. I'd be surprised if the Pepper character isn't shunted further into background by the time IM3 drops.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 7, 2010 9:36 PM

You need to add a GOOP link, Rowles.
I read BOOB link.
If your in the public eye as much as she is with films,publishing,commercials and charity work then that is very much a part of your career,your selling an image. As pretty as she is, her GOOP'ishness etc is like a cheese grater vigorously attacking my scrotum. So yeah, I enjoyed the career assessment. Her film work has been out GOOPED by her arrogance.

Posted by: bob at May 7, 2010 9:38 PM

Here's a litmus test: I bet you you can't come up with a single role where you can say "this is a Paltrow character"
I know, I know. A head in a box.

Posted by: bob at May 7, 2010 9:46 PM

I don't hate Gwyneth, BTW. Don't really love her, either. She's just there.

This pretty much sums up my feelings on Gwyneth, too. I like most of her movies (or at least her performance if not the actual movie), and I loved Se7en and Sliding Doors.

I understand the feeling of hatred toward a celebrity when it's revealed that he or she is a total asshat (see: Tom Cruise, Russell Crowe), but for some reason it just hasn't gotten to me with Gwyneth. I've never read any of her Goop articles and I rarely read personal interviews with her, so I suspect that has a lot to do with it. For me, she's just a decent actress that I don't mind watching in films.

Posted by: Even Stevens at May 7, 2010 9:59 PM

I know, I know. A head in a box.

Posted by: bob at May 7, 2010 9:46 PM

-------------------------------------------

Well played!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 7, 2010 10:28 PM

What I don't get about the hate is why anyone would bother reading GOOP or her interviews if they don't like her? This stuff isn't shoved down anyone's throats, you have to seek it out. Isn't life too short?

I don't see why winning the Oscar is a reason to hate her. Sure, she shouldn't have won, but she didn't really have a choice in the matter. Same with her parents and the nepotism issue. I don't see anyone hating on, say, Jake and Maggie Gyllenhaal because of the big names their parents were friends with. You can't choose who your parents are and you'd be crazy not to accept help if you want to be an actress.

I quite like her. She's a good actress. Not great, but better than a whole lot of her peers. She's one of the few stars who actually seems concerned about her children being photographed. She's pretty honest about pregnancy and parenthood being hard, in contrast to the rainbows and butterflies spiel actresses usually churn out. She admits she has to work to get that body, unlike the usual "I eat so much junk food and never work out" line we usually hear. And she's probably the only major actress who would agree to be filmed sans make-up, bright red and sweating like crazy.

Posted by: KateMC at May 7, 2010 11:59 PM

Some Pajiba readers have objected to the recent Human Centipede obsession, for mine the "2 minutes hate against celebrity X" threads are where I get off.

Maybe it's because I don't pay much attention to the off screen stuff but I'm not really bothered by her. Outside of her craft, her opinion is no more valid than anyone else's and that's the importance with which it should be treated. What little I have seen might have had the whiff of entitlement to it, but in a world where paranoia inciting assholes like Beck and Hannity gets a prime time pulpit, she's a far from worthy target for that level of vitriol.

Posted by: Squirrelgripper at May 8, 2010 12:27 AM

Paltrow owes Blanchett an Oscar! I think pretty much everyone agrees that Cate gave THE best performance of that particular year! A fucking travesty I say!

Posted by: Jennifer at May 8, 2010 1:30 AM

V. funny, AB, and somewhat true. I will take you to task, though, for the swipe at GP's English accents. In all three of Emma, Sliding Doors and SiL, her accent was spot-on. I live and grew up in England and I can tell you, she pretty much nailed it.

Posted by: Carlos at May 8, 2010 2:36 AM

Okay, just delurking to toss my two cents in here: everyone being all nice and forgiving and asking, "Why the hate?", well, hating on Gwyneth Paltrow or anyone else is not a rational choice people make. We don't have a line graph featuring douches and saints, and a set of criteria they have to fulfil to be one or the other. It's just a gut reaction. Someone can just wind you up.

Gwyneth winds me up. I catch snippets from GOOP and read interviews with her sometimes - I don't hunt them out, I just surf the internet a lot and there it is - and though objectively I might think, "Well, I'm sure there's some sense in this, people are being harsh. She's harmless", in my gut I can't help disliking her. There is just SOMETHING ABOUT THE WAY SHE IS that turns her helpfulness into holier-than-thouness, that dresses her disclosures about her private life in the rags of the poor-little-rich-girl sob story. But even trying to determine exactly WHY she's annoying is almost beside the point; she just is. Some people just are. Maybe not to everyone, but there you go.

Other celebrities can be douchier or even downright vile, but still entertaining, and still not necessarily make you say "Oh God, not them again" the way she does. Gwyneth just grates. It's not right, it's not fair, it's very unjust of us all to judge a woman based on a gut reaction, but a gut reaction is all we have. She's just annoying. It's like asking someone why they don't like a type of food. The answer is always, "I just don't".

Posted by: Mmm Strawberries at May 8, 2010 4:09 AM

Aside form the other stuff, I can categorically state her attempts at an English accent are not atrocious. They are pretty spot on.

And I say that as someone who has been speaking with an English accent of his own for 40 years.

Posted by: CallMeDave at May 8, 2010 5:26 AM

The reason why a lot of people strongly dislike her is because she attempts an image of a pretty, WASPY and educated woman when in fact she is just the opposite. Some of us just love to watch her torture herself as she tries to mold herself into that image above. I won't go into her fabrications, poor grammar and cosmetic procedures. She just will never have IT and will never be sexy no matter how she tries to package herself. Those who are closer to her ideal than she herself is normally feel the need to call her out. That my friends is where all of the hatred for her emanates.

Posted by: Sickitten at May 8, 2010 5:35 AM

Gwwwyyynnneth who?

Posted by: , at May 8, 2010 10:22 AM

Seriously, you can't name somebody Gwyneth and then act all surprised when she turns into a spoiled princess.

Posted by: , at May 8, 2010 10:24 AM

I don't really have any opinion one way or the other on Gwynneth Paltrow as a person, (though I accept from the opinions above that most of the commenters here find her fairly unlikeable). But I've enjoyed several of her performances. And I am English and I thought her accent in Sliding Doors and Shakespeare in Love (to name but two) was spot on! One of the best "Americans-doing-English" I've ever heard. No, of course she didn't deserve the Oscar over Cate Blanchett, but how many times do we see the Oscar go to the wrong person? Happens all the time. I don't seek her movies out, but I've never actually been put off seeing one just because she's in it. I think what I'm trying to say is that I'm neutral on the subject!

Posted by: Mnemo at May 8, 2010 1:06 PM

I thought it was crass when she said that Brits handled the 7/07 bombing so much better than the Americans did w/9/11. Probably the most insensitive comment ever.

I decided to give her another chance. A few days ago, I watched her on a morning show. She went on and on about how she was successful at an early age, buying her 1st million dollar home at 23! And, her friends were so jealous! And, that she did GOOP to help people, etc. Then, the host complimented her by saying, "And, you are so down to earth!" I nearly spit up my Cheerios.

Plus, she's not a great actress. She's certainly not Cate Blanchett (who was robbed BTW). So, I don't watch any Paltrow movies if I can help it. I just have a hard time watching people I find really annoying. It's like rewarding them for being assholes. This is why overprivileged, egotistical actors should shut up, or play nice, and let their talent speak for them. They'll get much less shit from the general public that way.

Posted by: cecilia at May 8, 2010 4:08 PM

Look, her public persona bothers me, but I can ignore that for the most part.

My problem is that she's a mediocre actress that is lauded as a great actress. Every movie I've seen her in, I've never see her play a character as anything other than 'GP playing this person' as opposed to 'this person played by GP'. She never falls fully into a role and is always playing the person as herself to some degree. It's boring. She hasn't any real leading lady roles since she won the Oscar (I'm sorry but Proof was horrible, and sky captain the world of tomorrow might have been good, but certainly not a 'amazing actress' kind of film) Even her indie films fall flat-and if it weren't for Iron Man no one would be talking about her except for GOOP. That's the only thing that keeps her relevant these days, esp in her own mind.

Actually, calling her a actress is pretty kind. I'd say she's more of a former star, who is now into media who occassionaly acts in a movie. And sells 800 calorie diets as being whats best.

Posted by: fran_tastic at May 8, 2010 4:39 PM

Paltrow bugs me too, but as an actress she's pretty good. I totally get how she rubs people the wrong way in interviews or on her website, but I don't get the hate for her as an actress. She's much better than most of the starlets out there.

Posted by: Turtle at May 8, 2010 5:08 PM

I used to strongly dislike Gwyneth for all of the reasons revealed so entertainingly by Bedhead.
When she was announced as Best Actress I literally screamed in shock and dismay as a little part of my movie-loving heart cracked.

But...did you see her on SNL? F'ing hilarous. I would still not characterize myself as a fan, but I no longer actively avoid her, and even enjoy her movies on occasion. whatever her faults, I must give her props...her comedic timing is impeccable.

(If only I couldn't picture her reply: (sniff)"Of course...I am impeccable.")

Posted by: Elle at May 8, 2010 7:04 PM

"I’ve often referred to her as “GPal” due to her attitudinal (made-up word!) proximity to JLo, who uses her so-called Latina roots much in the same manner as Gwyneth when she claims to be African or some such nonsense."

I assume Pajiba doesn't get many Latina readers, hence the lack of comment on the above. "So-called Latina"? Jennifer Lopez is a Boricua -- a Puerto Rican-American, and as Latina as they come (being Xicana myself, I've parsed a few ethnicities). I'm not sure what your point was. Paltrow is a big fake in the sense that Lopez is fake? If so, how is Lopez a fake Latina? Paltrow has as much attitude as Lopez? If so, how does Lopez being a Latina help you make your point?

I enjoyed the article up until the above comment, and was subsequently too distracted to appreciate the rest. Please: if you're not Latina, or a woman of color for that matter, kindly refrain from deciding who's a true Boricua/Xicana/Chapina/Guajira/Chilanga/etc., and leave that to those who truly know. Hint: you have to be born into it to know.

Posted by: PDamian at May 9, 2010 12:23 AM

Here's a litmus test: I bet you you can't come up with a single role where you can say "this is a Paltrow character"

Margot in Royal Tenenbaums. I don't know if it's the "quintessential" Paltrow role but I remember thinking that she fit the role rather well ...


and I agree that this article doesn't say much about Gwyneth Paltrow's career ...

Posted by: lelnguye at May 9, 2010 7:09 AM

I am another person who happens to have a visceral and inexplicable dislike for Gwyneth Paltrow. Maybe her superior attitude bothers me, or the fact that I suspect she doesn't have much of a sense of humor--I like RDJ for example because I always feel like his attitude is "Hey guys, I'm making a movie and you're going to LOVE it! We're all going to have a great time with this!" whereas GP is more "I'm making this movie, and it's a real shame that the peons aren't going to understand the true depth of this performance." I don't really know, I'm sure it has a lot more to do with me then her. However, I agree with lelnguye that her performance as Margot in The Royal Tennenbaums was tremendous. It's the only thing I've really liked her in.

Posted by: Siege at May 9, 2010 9:01 PM

I don't get it. All celebrities are snotty bitches. ALL OF THEM. Natalie Portman and Angelina Jolie are two of the worst, but for some reason Gwyneth is the only one who gets all the hate for it and she's just as good of an actress as they are.

I haven't read the comments yet, so maybe I'll find out why this is when I do.

Posted by: kayla at May 13, 2010 10:04 AM

This reminds of the things that people used to say about Jane Fonda another actress who was born with an Oscar in her mouth which once issued, was immediately replaced by her foot. Jane had that whole anti-American thing plus fitness, Gwyneth has the anti-American thing plus GOOP. It's a shame really, cause they are both pretty good actors of their respective generations (not Streep or Blanchett good of course) but who can even see that now because of the ill-will generated by their pretentious, affected, sanctimonious off-screen personalities. Ladies, listen to your publicists, it's what you pay them for.

Posted by: Choag at May 18, 2010 7:49 PM

I really despised the dress she wore when she accepted her oscar. It was so ill-fitting.

Posted by: courtney at July 30, 2010 10:23 PM

I still haven't decided who I dislike more after finding out that Douglas and Paltrow were banging each other on the Perfect Murder set, him or her. Pretty much puts Paltrow and Catherine Zeta-Jones on the same footing, with the saddest part being that Paltrow needed the career boost less because of the inherent two-way nepotism.

Posted by: Jerry at September 19, 2010 3:06 AM

Your article is quite uesful to me and assist me solve a massive issue. I appreciate you very much. But i have some issue of comprehend the last paragraph. Can you say some details for me?

Posted by: Windows 7 at November 29, 2010 8:45 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time