web
counter
 

There's Something Puzzling About Mary

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Career Assessments | Comments (28)



diaz1sm.jpg

Subject: Cameron Michelle Diaz, 37-year old American actress/former model

Date of Assessment: May 21, 2010

Positive Buzzwords: Bankability, longevity, able to burp on command

Negative Buzzwords: Overrated, wtf?

The Case: While I’m never particularly impressed at a “meh” declaration, I must confess to a surprisingly blasé attitude towards Cameron Diaz. She’s not particularly talented, nor is she terribly bright (that MTV eco-tourism special wherein Cameron declared her jealousy towards Drew Barrymore for taking the first “poo in the woods” comes to mind), but Diaz has enjoyed quite an enduring career since her acting debut in The Mask (1994). From there, Diaz has coasted upon a series of hits that have allowed her to build a rather deceptive box-office legacy. Undeniably, any actress would be awfully fortunate to have co-starred in projects with such heavyweight headliners as Jim Carrey (The Mask), Julia Roberts (My Best Friend’s Wedding), Drew Barrymore (Charlie’s Angels), and Tom Cruise (Vanilla Sky). Not to mention a certain franchise about a green ogre, which has consistently won over hundreds of millions of box office dollars, yet a vast majority of the audience (wee kidlets) never even realize that there are actors behind the characters.

Certainly, Cameron’s resumé of late could be described in the following terms: “[H]ow shall we put this?… Shrek-heavy.” And really, how much effort has it taken for Diaz to fulfill these celebrity voice talent duties? There’s no official word on time required by her commitments for the Shrek movies; however, as a crude measuring stick, Angelina Jolie confessed to spending a mere 2 1/2 days on the Beowulf movie. Consider also that Diaz’s participation in the Shrek franchise has resulted in four movies’ worth of ungodly salaries ($3 million for the first installment, $10 million for the second, and so on).

Diaz has connections, no doubt about it, and she lucked out for quite awhile by essentially playing variations upon the same character type (A Life Less Ordinary, She’s the One, My Best Friend’s Wedding, Very Bad Things, Feeling Minnesota, and The Sweetest Thing). The slightly bewildering aspect of all of this repetition is that, in more than one instance — Being John Malkovich and The Box — Diaz has shown herself capable of stepping outside the romcom (for lack of a better word) box. However, the Golden Globe nomination she received for the former film can be swiftly counterbalanced with the mixed reviews she received for her peformance in the latter. After all, Diaz did receive the “There’s Always Waitressing Award” for Worst Actress in The Box, which sat on studio shelves for a few years before receiving a begrudging release and a rather embarrassing $15 box office take.

These days, Diaz simply could not open a movie on her own star power (and, as mentioned already, it’s debatable whether she’s ever done so). In some cases, she can’t open the movie with help from fellow A-listers Jude Law and Kate Winslet or with fading eye candy such as Ashton Kutcher. And were it not for the Shrek franchise’s success, Diaz’s worth would have fallen off the Hollywood radar long ago. As a live-action marquee name, her last five years of movies — My Sister’s Keeper, In Her Shoes, The Holiday, and The Box — were all underperformers, and even the seemingly reliable formulaic romcom, What Happens in Vegas, failed to measure up to Diaz’s (also formulaic) outings of yesteryear.

Still, it’s rather difficult to get a grasp upon exactly how the theatergoing public feels about Cameron Diaz. The only movie that Diaz has opened largely on her own star power was 1998’s There’s Something About Mary. Admittedly, she shined in this role, but a lot of that movie’s success also came from word-of-mouth (“beans and franks”) publicity about the Farrelly brothers’ home-run (one of their only such wins) of politically-incorrect humor. One cannot help but conclude that Diaz has gotten away with a rather successful acting career but spent very little time doing any actressin’ at all.

Prognosis: For now, aside from this weekend’s release of Shrek Forever After, Diaz has returned to romcoms yet again. This time, she’s teaming up with another hopeful comeback kid, Tom “unhinged, lift-wearing midget” Cruise (again), for Knight and Day. In all likelihood, this joint venture will be successful and give Diaz a bit of a career boost. However, romcom queens are in plentiful supply, so I do forsee some serious downtime for Diaz in the not-too-distant future. She’d best save her millions, and it probably wouldn’t hurt if she signed autographs instead of (lecturing people) insulting those who ask for them.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba Love 05/21/10 | Solitary Man Revew | Outstanding









Comments

“unhinged, lift-wearing midget”

What does it mean that I thought that said "LEFT-wearing midget", thought that meant he dresses left and then clicked the link to see the close up.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at May 21, 2010 2:27 PM

Although I really LOVED Diaz's character in Being John Malkovich, I agree. This chick (along with a gaggle of other romantic-comedy queens--Aniston, Hudson, etc) have skated by. All these chicks get major PR based on tabloids, sex appeal, or high- profile romances with big stars. It's never about their talent. None of them have ever opened a film by themselves, yet they always seem to take the credit for ensemble offerings, dog and Ogre movies, playing the girlfriend to bigger stars, etc. It's funny how fame trumps talent every time in Hollywood.

Posted by: Cecilia at May 21, 2010 2:37 PM

I just wanna punch her in the face.

Posted by: dammitjanet at May 21, 2010 2:45 PM

Spot-on assessment, AB. There's been this sad pattern of stale, "comeback" career moves in most of these assessments lately, hmm? Other than that, I think Cameron has a genuinely awesome smile.

Posted by: Katie (KP) at May 21, 2010 2:54 PM

*insert "unhinge jaw, insert massive object/large mammal here" jokes.

I'll give Diaz credit for not being Aniston, in that she might actually have a fun side, and she does actually try to be a character.

But her "talent" as an actress is massively overrated. I'm not sure that Malkovich had anything to do with her talent; is it more likely that the material and direction of the movie is responsible for this? Has she given us anything else to show us she's capable of replicating that performance?

Posted by: D-Day at May 21, 2010 2:54 PM

One cannot help but conclude that Diaz has gotten away with a rather successful acting career but spent very little time doing any actressin’ at all.

All of this. The last thing that she did that I was genuinely impressed by was Any Given Sunday, and that was back in '99. She seems content to do harmless rom-coms that don't require any thought. I haven't seen her in The Box, and I hated the John Malcovich movie. But she always playing some complete airhead. Her portrayal of Natalie in Charlie's Angels has to be one of the most annoying, idiotic people I've ever seen, and I honestly want to smash my fist through the wall when she does that stupid dance in the Sesame Street underwear.

Posted by: Brie at May 21, 2010 2:56 PM

I just wanna punch her in the face.
Posted by: dammitjanet at May 21, 2010 2:45

hahahaha, I feel that way about Kate Hudson also.


Posted by: Smithee at May 21, 2010 3:06 PM

What I like about Cameron Diaz is that I don't thikn *she* walks around thinking she's some great actress. She knows her strengths and weaknesses and tries to profit accordingly. I don't know - she just seems a hell of a lot more normal than Aniston et al.

Posted by: samantha t at May 21, 2010 3:38 PM

Agree with the assessment!! But in a not so related matter, I'm just never sure what this ability to "open a movie on your own" means. Who exactly is this person who has such ability? It always depends on a lot of other factors, doesn't it?? (director, plot (or the lack of it), publicity...) I'm not saying it doesn't exist. I just can't think who this person is.
For me, the people I'd usually see a movie just 'cause they're in it are mostly not really proftable. Maybe this could be a comment diversion, or seriously random list... :P

Posted by: Mariazinha at May 21, 2010 3:38 PM

I'm from Long Beach, where Cameron Diaz is from as well.

I absolutely can't stand her. She did this interview where she basically took a crap all over Long Beach because she was some spoiled girl going to a ghetto (but prestigious) high school who didn't quite fit in.

/rant

Posted by: Amanda at May 21, 2010 3:52 PM


i think she has a bit more acting ability than she is given credit
for and she needs that because she seems to be aging faster than
romcom queens like meg ryan and sandra bullock. that window is
closing and she needs to attempt the transition to more serious
roles.

Posted by: snake at May 21, 2010 4:18 PM

I think her relationship with Justin Timberlake definitely helped a LOT in keeping her in the mind of the public. So she hasn't done fuckall when it comes to good movies, but she's in the tabloids all the time, so she'll coast by on that.

Like you, I don't really have very strong feelings for her either way. She's really likable and sunny in the right role, but she's not very remarkable.

I think most people just remember the embarrassing booty dance from Charlie's Angel as her shining moment.

Posted by: figgy at May 21, 2010 4:20 PM

I actually liked her a lot in The Box.

She's getting older, and for the first I can recall, it showed (or if just makeup, she allowed them to do that).

But her performance also seemed to be getting older too, in the good way...she did a decent job of portraying the complexities of her character (which, as it was a Richard Kelly movie, were not inconsiderable) I thought. I can't remember any other time she played a character with ANY complexities (she was good in Malkovitch, but her character was pretty thin, mostly a prop to move the plot along).

Posted by: Jacktrade at May 21, 2010 4:30 PM

As a sidekick she's a safe bet, but you could never see her putting out a strong performance on her own. Remarkably unremarkable.

Posted by: peanut at May 21, 2010 4:36 PM

Jacktrade - I thought she was fine in "The Box" (yes I saw it - calm down, people). I also thought she was fine in "In Her Shoes." It's tough to share the screen with Toni Colette and she did just fine. She's no Streep, but she's not a disaster.

Moreover, I respect that, as a woman my age, she appears not to have had plastic surgery and that she's not trying to look 25.

Posted by: samantha t at May 21, 2010 4:57 PM

While your assessment is spot-on, I give her a pass because she doesn't seem to take herself too seriously. I've never heard her complain about being typecast or bemoan the fact that she's not taken seriously as an actress. She seems to know she's been coasting, and she's fine with it. I can respect someone who knows what kind of car they can drive and rides it 'til the wheels fall off.

Posted by: ceejeemcbeegee at May 21, 2010 5:27 PM

………I’m thinking maybe those are 32c’s………my guess is if she went to a full cup 36 then maybe the choice roles will start rolling in.

Posted by: Pookie at May 21, 2010 6:08 PM

I think she has a very pretty smile. And yeah, her career is in the toilet.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at May 21, 2010 7:07 PM

I was in Beijing on vacation with my family and we ended up having breakfast with Cameron Diaz in the hotel restaurant, as we were the only groups awake for the buffet that morning.

My impression? totally chill lady. granted we didn't ask her for autographs or anything. Basically, i was getting cereal, asked my sister if i was correct in identifying her, and then i struck up a conversation. She was taking a day off with her best friend from home to see the great wall while she was promoting shrek 3 in shanghai. I jokingly asked her if the movie was any good and she said "if you liked the other ones, you'll like this one." very matter of fact and positive.

we actually chatted about voice acting, and she had a real down to earth opinion about it, how its nice to be able to sort of do your recording more like a 9-5 job and then have a life afterwards. She blithely tolerated my forest-bound maine uncle's good natured flirting and we had a good time shooting the shit.

I personally love both charlie's angels flicks and the shrek films are really fun too, so i'm biased i guess, but over all, as afore mentioned, really nice lady and i wish her all the best.

Posted by: Johnny Von Awesome at May 21, 2010 7:42 PM

Her shirt won't shirt itself.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at May 21, 2010 8:36 PM

I hate Cameron Diaz. Actors/Actresses who currently fall under my "never see their movies unless there's someone involved that supercedes their awfulness":

-Drew Barrymore
-Cameron Diaz
-Megan Fox
-Heidi Montag (and Spencer, though duh)
-Fergie
-George Lopez
-Rob Schneider
-Kevin James
-Taylor Lautner
-Tyler Perry

And I could go on and just list people that we all hate, but you get the picture.

Posted by: ChristianH at May 21, 2010 8:41 PM

She has a staggeringly cute ass.

And... that's pretty much it.

Posted by: The Mutt at May 21, 2010 9:50 PM

I can't buy her in romcoms because underneath the makeup she's a hag. The smile probably looks great in a dimly lit bar at last call, though.

Posted by: , at May 21, 2010 11:48 PM

I think she is vastly underrated for her performance in My Best Friend's Wedding. She utterly stole the movie from Julia Roberts as she pulled off such an endearing and vulnerable character.

And...does anyone else remember her legs in the dance scenes from The Mask?

Posted by: jmflynny at May 22, 2010 12:01 AM

And...does anyone else remember her legs in the dance scenes from The Mask?
Right here yo!

If I'm being honest, I think she's a mediocre actress. She's not bad and, depending on the role and the director, she can give a good performance. See There's Something About Mary or Any Given Sunday. She has maximized every bit of her potential by picking roles suited to her and by knowing how to manipulate the tabloid media of Hollywood.

Her problem going forward is that she's not going to be able to find those rom-com roles coming to her -- they're going to go to the Katherine Heigls, Isla Fishers, Amy Adams, Mandy Moores and Ashley Greenes and a dozen other, young, pretty actresses.

I don't think she's got it in her to become a Glenn Close-type: someone taking serious roles wherever they're available. But I could be wrong.

Posted by: Fredo at May 22, 2010 3:45 AM

Poor poor Cameron Diaz. From 1998 to 2002, you had some amazing roles in impressive movies:

There's Something About Mary - 1998
Being John M./Any Given Sunday - 1999
Charlies Angels (yes, I went there. I love those movies.) - 2000
Shrek/Vanilla Sky - 2001
Gangs of New York - 2002

Sure, there were some bombs during those years. That's too be expected. But after 2002, I can't stand behind or support any of her role choices (except CA: Full Throttle, obviously). WTF happened? How do you go from Scorsese/Jonze/Crowe to almost a decade or forgettable romcoms?

I don't care. I'm still holding out hope she'll return to her former glory she obtained in her golden years.

Posted by: earthmanjack at May 22, 2010 4:34 AM

I like her well enough. She's a good comedic actress. That's her strength. She has a lot of personality and looks good on the screen. She was good in The Box, but no one saw the film, so they just assume it was bad. Confused? Sure. Bad? Not really. Watch. Reviews of that awful looking Cruise/Diaz vehicle Knight and Day will call it a return to form for both actors and boost Diaz back to the spotlight.

Posted by: Robert at May 22, 2010 11:11 AM

I just wanna punch her in the face.

Posted by: dammitjanet at May 21, 2010 2:45 PM

---

Be careful. If her mouth is open you might lose that hand of yours.

Posted by: piedlourde at May 23, 2010 8:33 AM