web
counter
 

The Whole is More than the Sum of the Parts

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Career Assessments | Comments (24)



howard1sm.jpg

Subject:Bryce Dallas Howard, 29-year old American actress

Date of Assessment: October 22, 2010

Positive Buzzwords: Beauty, talent, persistence

Negative Buzzwords: Nepotism, unsettling, Shyamalan

The Case: This week’s subject reveals herself as a puzzling illustration of an actress that, theoretically speaking, should have experienced a greater degree of career success than has actually occurred to date. Of course, one expects good (if not necessarily great) things for the daughter of Ron Howard (whose own quality ebbs and flows), but Bryce Dallas Howard hasn’t merely shown a willingness to ride upon her father’s proverbial ginger-tinted coattails.

In terms of nepotism and for the sake of argument, let’s compare (at least in a cursory respect) Bryce to Gwyneth Paltrow. Both actresses have enjoyed success in their own rights yet were undeniably able to place their stiletto heels in the door jam (without losing those tootsies) because of their famous Hollywood director fathers, but that’s where the similarity ends. If one wishes to compare the offbeat, slightly unsettling appeal of Bryce with the more conventionally appealing Gwyneth in a temporal sense, Bryce runs far behind in Hollywood starlet terms. Then again, pausing to finish a college degree, do some time on Broadway, and dabble with Steppenwolf means that Bryce bubbled under the radar for some time before forging onto a full-fledged movie career. In simpler terms, Bryce has paid her dues to a greater degree than someone like Rumer Willis, Kate Hudson, Charlie Sheen, or any of the other myriad Hollywood progeny that run around flaunting their own unjustified and ill-gotten gains.

Then again, it’s a bit strange that Bryce’s comparatively sparse film credits don’t give us much in the way of discussion. It’s been about seven years since Bryce made her first credited movie appearance; by this same measure of time, Gwyneth had already appeared in twice as many films and had just captured that coveted Oscar for Shakespeare in Love. In contrast, Bryce’s ascent has been slower and steadier, which perhaps accounts for a stronger sense of disappointment after she unpredictably changed paths and uncharacteristically embraced a mountain of commercialized crap. While Bryce continues to demonstrate versatility within roles, it’s rather uncanny how she manages to latch onto the tail end of franchises — Spiderman 3, Terminator Salvation, and Twilight: Eclipse — and enjoy the monetary fruits that were already established long before her arrival. In addition, Bryce remains a hot button and subject of heated debate within the Twihard camp; her assumption of the Victoria role (taking over after Rachelle Lafevre, who previously appeared in Twilight and New Moon, received the boot) has left Bryce standing on the receiving end of some irrationally perverse hatred. Somehow, those who have followed her career expect her to choose better roles rather than go for the almighty dollar, but can we really blame her for doing so?

Bryce was largely unknown when M. Night Shyamalan cast her as the blind Ivy Walker in The Village; her performance as an innocent yet surprisingly willful young woman remains the sole shining component within the entire soul-sucking movie. From there, she gave a critically-acclaimed turn in Lars von Trier’s Manderlay before puzzling the lot of us in Lady in the Water and going largely unappreciated in The Loss of a Teardrop Diamond. As mentioned above, more standard mainstream fare awaited to pad Bryce’s wallet but largely waste her talent. Overall, her career hasn’t turned out too shabbily, for an unnamed number or actresses would die at a chance for such roles, but there’s still a lingering sense that she could do much better. On a more promising note, Bryce has a few movies in post-production that feature her teaming with several big names like Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Seth Rogen, and Anna Kendrick (Live with It) as well as Emma Stone and Sissy Spacek (The Help). Now, she just might earn back some street cred in Clint Eastwood’s Hereafter alongside Matt Damon, but this weekend’s box-office shall tell that tale.

Prognosis: Ultimately, Bryce Dallas Howard’s future success in Hollywood seems certain. Her acting resumé might not gleam with the same overrated luster of Gwyneth Paltrow, but therein lies the key difference. With Gwyneth, one gets the feeling that the success isn’t altogether deserved. With Bryce, one wonders why she hasn’t been more successful, which is a good sign or, at least, an indication that we’d like to see more of her onscreen.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba Love 22/10/10 | Going To A Party Where No One's Still Alive | Twelve Pop Culture Ghosts I'd Want At My Halloween Festivities









Comments

The so-called persistence is just a manifestation of the nepotism. This is just Goopy Paltrow redux.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 22, 2010 3:33 PM

Is it just me, or does she slightly resemble a Firefly-era Yo-Saff-Bridge Christina Hendricks in that picture?

Posted by: lordhelmet at October 22, 2010 3:37 PM

I'll leave it at she was a better Mary Jane in Spider-Man 3 than the special actress actually playing Mary Jane.

Posted by: Robert at October 22, 2010 3:43 PM

It must be so awesome to just have your dad call on any production to have them accommodate your ass. The Twilight incident reeked of that, hence I can never, ever, buy the theory that this child of privilege has "paid her dues." She can have the luxury to go on walkabout and return whenever the hell she feels like it 'cause she has guaranteed employment. Other up and coming actors can't afford to DO that shit.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 22, 2010 4:05 PM

Meh. I don't get her appeal at all. She has not had a memorable role ever and she did not even rise above other actors in any of the commercial crap like Terminator 4. She has not displayed anything to make us think she is special. This woman is just a pretty ginger with blue eyes. I see her future in skin product commercials, not movies.

G. Paltrow, though a lot of people hate her around here, was really good in Tenenbaums, Mr Ripley, Sliding Doors, Great Expectations and Seven. And she was not bad in Iron Man. Say what you want, Paltrow has and will have a much better career than BDH.

Posted by: kerokan at October 22, 2010 4:06 PM

A pretty girl but I wonder if she's not too generic to ever break through. Her biggest roles (The Village, Lady in the Water) have her play innocents -- even Gwen Stacy is played as a what would have been called a long time ago a "nice girl."

She could end up being another Teri Polo -- pretty but only a supporting actress.

Posted by: Fredo at October 22, 2010 4:28 PM

It must be so awesome to just have your dad call on any production to have them accommodate your ass.

If Twilight is the best nepotism can do, Father's Day should be cancelled in that household.

Again, I don't see any reason to dislike her. I agree with the assessment: it just seems like she is slumming it, more than undue accolades. Like the acting thing is more a hobby than a career.

And as far as all those poor, struggling actresses she might be beating out of roles, considering the films she has been in, I highly doubt some great unknown would have even been picked for them, let alone be any better.

Except Prisco of course. He would have been a fantastic Gwen Stacy.

Posted by: Vermillion at October 22, 2010 4:54 PM

If Twilight is the best nepotism can do, Father's Day should be cancelled in that household.
I don't see any reason to dislike her.
Posted by: Vermillion at October 22, 2010 4:54 PM

----------------------------------------

First of all, I don't dislike her. DO I think she gets access to roles while other more talented actors have to struggle and remain in the food service industry, yes, yes I do. Is that how Hollywood works? Sadly it is. Second, I'm not even going to point out how silly it is to call a sweet gig on the biggest box-office franchise in the ...ah...world? a bad thing for financial security. Like I said that'd be silly. Would you cancel father's day in your household if your lifelong fantasy of scoring the Bella role was facilitated by Vermillion Senior?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 22, 2010 5:46 PM

What kerokan said.

I just can't remember her face. Every single time its "Aaah, that's her!" and then I forget her all over again. Gwyneth I recognize. She's the female blonde on Brad Pitt nudie pics.

Posted by: schmerpes at October 22, 2010 6:34 PM

Would you cancel father's day in your household if your lifelong fantasy of scoring the Bella role was facilitated by Vermillion Senior?

Hah. Funny. Like a heart attack.

And I never said the role was bad for financial security. That would indeed be stupid to say, which is why I never said it.

I said that, if her father thought fighting for a slot in the Twilight films was a waste in nepotism, mostly because they are terrible movies. Especially considering that said father has his own massively successful book-based franchise to use.

And she can't be that lacking in financial security, seeing as how not only she has had her own projects before acting, but once again, her father has his own massive films to put her in. Maybe he doesn't want to pull a Coppola, I don't know.

Posted by: Vermillion at October 22, 2010 6:35 PM

I actually really like her. I thought she was great in The Village, TBH.

Posted by: Will at October 22, 2010 7:35 PM

I attribute her lack of success to the fact that she's so bland and uninteresting that she barely registers on film. Like schmerpes said, I recognize her and then promptly forget about her.

She was the best thing in the Village but that's a pretty low hurdle.

Posted by: Abby at October 22, 2010 7:40 PM

For someone who's a redhead, she's just so... meh. blahhh. boring.

Posted by: denesteak at October 22, 2010 8:05 PM

wow, this just seemed like a whole column devoted to nobody. out of all the people out there who are acting, you choose a bit player from the edges of half a dozen movies to do a career assessment?

and unless you were a child star, there is no need to do an assessment on anyone's career when they have not yet reached 30.

I don't always have much of a choice when picking the weekly assessment subject, which is determined by a number of factors including the movie release schedule. - AB

Posted by: idleprimate at October 22, 2010 9:49 PM

"pull a coppola"

is that what nick cage did?

Posted by: idleprimate at October 22, 2010 9:50 PM

In Hollywood, actors often have a short window to grab as many top scripts at possible. If they fumble that chance - pick poor projects or roles that don't showcase their talents - they go back to the end of the line and rely on luck to land that breakout role.

Remember Michael Keaton post-Batman? He was the hottest actor around. Then he chose lousy projects like "Multiplicity" and his level of fame receded.

That's where Howard is today ... just another actress crossing her fingers for a second change at A-list fame.

Posted by: Christian Toto at October 22, 2010 10:59 PM

Huh.
I didn't know she was Ron Howard's daughter...

For some reason, I'm always getting her confused with Taylor Gilbert, the actress who played the character "Bryce" in Twister, 'cuz her name was "Bryce," 'cuz I'm dumb like that, I guess.
Which... would also explain why I didn't know she was Ron Howard's daughter...

Posted by: Rykker at October 23, 2010 3:56 AM

my apologies agent bedhead, I didn't know that. i wasn't trying to slight what you managed from what you had to work with.

i should maybe learn to keep my mouth shut.

No worries! It's just that the question/topic comes up frequently (albeit mostly on Twitter/Facebook/email), so I figured an answer might clear things up. Don't worry, it's not just you. -AB

Posted by: idleprimate at October 23, 2010 1:34 PM

I didnt know she was Ron Howards daughter either.

Posted by: payday uk at October 23, 2010 3:56 PM

i had no idea the was a pajibaverse outside of pajiba. facebook, twitter? I've heard of them, but these dimensions are beyond me.

I suddenly feel like some cross between charlie brown and ziggy. i look down at the rock in my bag and wonder what life is like for the twitter kids.

Posted by: idleprimate at October 23, 2010 4:22 PM

I just saw Bryce in Hereafter, and was deeply touched by her performance. As talented as the rest of the cast is, her scenes were by far the most interesting and compelling. She has the magic that lingers long after the scene is over. Also, I disagree that Gwyneth Paltrow is dependent on nepotism. I first saw her in a movie with Robert Eurick, I believe. There were 4 daughters, and Gwyneth easily stood out as the most interesting and likable. I had no idea who her real life parents were at the time, so I think Gwyneth's talent is fully credible on it's own.

Posted by: london at October 23, 2010 9:46 PM

I was apathetic about her until reading she's pissing off Twitards or whatever the hell we call them. More of a fan now.

Posted by: Dr. Zaius at October 24, 2010 11:34 AM

I GOT A CRAZY IDEA FOR U, DONT DO IT ” lmaooo !!!!!

Posted by: nicki minaj booty at January 28, 2011 7:33 PM

Many thanks for your time to have put these things together on this blog site. Michael and i also very much valued your knowledge through your articles over certain things. I'm sure that you have a variety of demands with your timetable hence the fact that you actually took the maximum amount of time like you did to guide people like us through this article is also highly appreciated.

Posted by: zero friction marketing at March 8, 2011 2:07 PM