web
counter
 

Denzel Washington: The Least Successful A-List Star in Hollywood?

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Box Office Round-Ups | Comments (21)



book-elie-denzel-arrow-660.jpg

When Safe House opened at number one this weekend with $24 million to bring its total after 10 days to close to $80 million, I took a gander over at Denzel Washington’s career box office numbers and noticed something striking. Through 30 years, two Oscar wins (and 5 nominations), and a number of iconic roles (or close to it), Denzel Washington has only three $100 million movies. In fact, the highest grossing Denzel movie of all time was American Gangster, which made $130 million. His lifetime average, after 40 movies, is $47 million. Not even $50 million, despite the fact that Denzel is one of the most recognizable, most popular actors in America.

The question is why? But the answer is simple: Denzel doesn’t do franchise movies. He has never done a sequel. He doesn’t do superheroes. And he’s only made a couple of remakes (The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 and The Manchurian Candidate). What does that make Denzel, besides one of the least successful A-list stars at the box-office? It makes him one of the most respectable. Denzel movies aren’t about the special effects or merchandizing, they are about Denzel, and so far as I’m concerned, that’s all they need to be about. He is a power house, a force of nature. He is flat-out amazing, and even when saddled with mediocre scripts like Safe House, Denzel transcends. Bonus: The guy rarely strays away from downbeat endings: How many times, in fact, has Denzel died in his movies? But that motherfucker is not the first black guy to die in his films, he’s the last. And he owns every scene in every film he’s in.

Here are his 10 most successful films

1. American Gangster — $130 million

2. Remember the Titans — $115 million

3. Pelican Brief — $100 million

4. The Book of Eli — $94 million

5. Crimson Tide — $91 million

6. Inside Man — $88 million

7. Unstoppable — $81 million

8. Safe House — $78 million

9. Man on Fire — $77 million

10. Philadelphia — $77 million

Here are his 10 Best Films

1. Philadelphia

2. Glory

3. Out of Time

4. Malcolm X

5. The Hurricane

6. Training Day

7. Devil in a Blue Dress

8. Remember the Titans

9. Inside Man

10. Unstoppable


Now, on to the rest of the weekend’s box office: The Vow, last week’s number one film, dropped slightly below last week’s number two film, Safe House, both of which edged out the week’s top debut, Ghost Rider: The Spirit of Vengeance. The Nic Cage sequel didn’t exactly bomb, but it’s opening frame was less than half of the first film’s opening weekend. But then again, the second film had half the budget of the first on account of people knowing that no one wanted a goddamn sequel. Last week’s number three film, Journey 2: The Mysterious Island had a slight drop (27 percent) to hold on to number four, while This Means War, debuted with a weak $17.5 million. I honestly didn’t get that movie: How do you fuck up Tom Hardy, Chris Pine, and Reese Witherspoon? I was absolutely floored by how terrible it was. That’s the power of McG, though. The man couldn’t boil water in hell.

Finally, The Secret World of Arreity debuted at number nine with $6.4 million, and while that might sound disappointing, it is the highest debut ever for a Studio Ghibli film, besting Ponyo’s $3.4 million. According to Agent Bedhead, it’s also a fantastic film.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



5 Shows After Dark 2/19/12 | Click Here To Find Out What Happens When The Amazing Spider-Man Takes On The Dreaded Door Man!









Comments

This Means War was so awful. So, so awful. And I say this with all my love for Hardy's work, face, charm and immense talent. However, and I swear this with all my questionable internet dignity, the row of teenaged girls who sat behind me in the theater were moaning and swooning like he was Edward fucking Cullen by the end of that movie. Go figure.

Posted by: Pants at February 20, 2012 12:11 AM

I don't know if 'successful' is the right word. Of the A-listers he's maybe the most reliable box office draw. 'Underrated' sounds better.

Posted by: Razz at February 20, 2012 12:39 AM

shhhhhhUUUSSSSSSHHH your mouth about "The Vow," Mrs. , doesn't know it's in the theaters and Id like to keep it that way.

Posted by: , at February 20, 2012 1:19 AM

Every time Pajiba does a list, I try to spot the one list entry which explains why it exists. Usually it's the last one, where the article leaves finishes off with an "oh shit, didn't see that one coming, did ya fucko?" attitude.

But today, Dustin presents a Denzel list just so he rate Out of Time that highly.

Now I'm going to rewatch that film, right now, with just as much "Eva Mendes and Dean Cain?!" skepticism as I did the first time (and which may also be responsible for my limited memory of the film). If it sucks, I'll... well I won't do anything. But I'll probably be mildly annoyed or something. I hope you can deal with that, Rowles.

Posted by: Steve at February 20, 2012 3:28 AM

Denzel's worldwide box-office comes close to $ 3 billion though, and Safe House has not even been released everywhere yet.

I wouldn't call that unsuccessful.

I prefer The D over people like Crazy Cruise or others who have a closer relationship to paparazzi than to family members.

Posted by: A.Lias at February 20, 2012 8:26 AM

“Philadelphia” my fat boil ridden ass, you goddamn critics are always looking at the content of a film and not the acting. “Man On Fire” or even “Malcolm X” were easily Washington’s best work. But since “Philadelphia” had the AIDS angle, the film cease being about the acting and more about the subject at the expense of the acting.

Posted by: Pookie at February 20, 2012 8:29 AM

Many, many mediocre movies all made better because of Denzel. I'd watch him in anything. I'd watch Russell in anything. Imagine how thrilled I was for American Gangster. And when I say that I'd watch them both in anything....I watched Virtuosity. Point proven.

Posted by: Kirbyjay at February 20, 2012 8:29 AM

I remember reading somewhere that Will Ferrell was the most overpaid star, because his movies did badly so often. Wouldn't he qualify as the least successful A-lister? Or is he not an A-list star anymore?

Posted by: Mitchell Hundred at February 20, 2012 9:19 AM

I'm a sucker for both Fallen and Crimson Tide. And the man is closing in on sixty years old. Unreal.

Posted by: branded at February 20, 2012 9:31 AM

"'Philadelphia' my fat boil ridden ass, you goddamn critics are always looking at the content of a film and not the acting. 'Man On Fire' or even 'Malcolm X' were easily Washington’s best work. But since 'Philadelphia' had the AIDS angle, the film cease being about the acting and more about the subject at the expense of the acting."

I hate it when Pookie's right. >:(

Posted by: Craig at February 20, 2012 9:43 AM

I have a confession to make...

I don't think I've ever seen a Denzel Washington movie; at least none mentioned above, and I can't recall seeing him in anything else.

I would never think: "oh cool, DW is in that, I've gotta check it out".

Posted by: AgileBeast at February 20, 2012 11:47 AM

Man On Fire gets snubbed again, fine. But Unstoppable on the Top 10 list? REALLY?? GTFO.

Posted by: Repo at February 20, 2012 11:48 AM

He's a babe :P

Posted by: Alsk at February 20, 2012 12:37 PM

Unstoppable was pretty cool, but not top-10 at the expense of He Got Game.

Posted by: Johnnyseattle at February 20, 2012 12:50 PM

Denzel should have won for Malcolm X instead of Al Pacino for Scent of a Woman which I thought was right when Pacino turned into a caricature of Pacino. He sucked in that but it was a career Oscar thus having Russell Crowe robbed for A Beautiful Mind and giving it to Denzel for Training Day because he was robbed for Malcolm X one of the best nominations for any actor ever.
Quite the domino effect these Oscars are.

Posted by: Kirbyjay at February 20, 2012 12:56 PM

Out of Time #3? One the list of his best? What an insult! That was the worst piece of shit ever. Eva Mendes? Cringeworthy. After seeing her in that movie I don't know how she ever got herself and "acting" job or that she's still considered an "actress." The majority of the acting in this film is embarrassing and so not worth Denzel's talent.

@ Steve: Skip.this.film. It's so not worth you re-watching in.

Posted by: Orleanas at February 20, 2012 1:06 PM

First, Pookie is right;

Second, Philadelphia is painfully bad in today's world. Tom Hanks and Antonio Bandaras seem to go out of their way to say "hey, I'm just playing a gay guy here, I'm not ACTUALLY gay". Think about how Michael C. played a gay man on six feet under. Now think of the stilted body language Hanks and Bandaras exhibited.

I've seen marines show more affection to each other than those two did (hmmmmm).

Posted by: Pragmatist at February 20, 2012 4:08 PM

Question: Do those numbers include overseas box office? Probably not. Everybody seems to forget the foreign box office, which is far more important these days since Americans don't seem to be going to the movies much.

I believe Denzel's movies do very well overseas and that is why he continues to get roles because he definitely would not be getting starring roles if his movies never break the $100M mark. Hollywood don't play that!!

Posted by: mslewis at February 20, 2012 4:15 PM

The Preacher's Wife was also a remake of the original Cary Grant/Loretta Young movie, The Bishop's Wife

Posted by: PaddyDog at February 20, 2012 4:38 PM

(which was also terrible)

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at February 21, 2012 11:32 AM

denzel will ever be one of the most iconic actor of all time.he acts with passion.i hope he gets an oscar nod again before he retires jst like d ever adorable screen goddes merryl streep

Posted by: osidoro dunsin at February 22, 2012 8:10 AM