Old School. Biblically Independent.
By Dustin Rowles | News | April 1, 2025
There is a state Supreme Court race in Wisconsin today that probably shouldn’t mean as much as it does, except that it’s now the most expensive race ever for a state judge. Elon Musk has pumped more than $20 million into the election, including a couple of $1 million giveaways to tilt the composition of the court toward Republicans in a state where Tesla has a legal case pending. I have no idea who is going to win this, but we’re likely going to find out by tomorrow morning whether Elon Musk can buy a state court election or if the backlash to his attempt will help the Democratic candidate.
I am certainly not getting my hopes up, and if anyone says the Democrats have a better “ground game,” I’m going to throw myself out a window. I do hope, however, that Wisconsinites from both sides of the aisle show up today to send the message that democracy can’t be bought (except, apparently, in presidential elections, where it was clearly bought several months ago).
In any case, Elon Musk is the richest man in the world and all too willing to throw his money around, except apparently, when it comes to child support, where he is less generous to the many many women who birth his children. Case in point: 26-year-old Ashley St. Clair, who delivered his 13th (or 14th—who can remember?) child last September, claims she sold her $100,000 Tesla yesterday because she needed the money to support her son after Musk reportedly reduced support payments by 60 percent.
Musk, who didn’t appreciate being called out on his own platform last February by St. Clair after Musk ghosted her, basically claimed at the time that St. Clair had orchestrated a years-long con to entrap him into impregnating her—although it is worth noting that St. Clair is no peach, either. Before becoming a single mom, she mocked single moms and suggested Kamala Harris advanced her career through sex.
In any case, after the paparazzi asked St. Clair why she was selling her Tesla in what was clearly a planned publicity stunt, Elon Musk shot back, insisting that he sent her $2.5 million and offered her $500,000 a year, even though he doesn’t even know if the kid is actually his. If true, that’s certainly enough money to support a child, but it’s also the equivalent of the cost of a banana to the rest of us.
All the same, St. Clair — who maybe has a little more respect for single mothers now — took to Musk’s platform to take the man to task.
Elon, we asked you to confirm paternity through a test before our child (who you named) was even born. You refused.And you weren’t sending *me* money, you were sending support for your child that you thought was necessary… until you withdrew most of it to maintain control and punish me for “disobedience.” But you’re really only punishing your son.
It’s ironic that your last effort in court was to try to gag me while you use a social media channel you literally own to distribute derogatory messages about me and our child to the entire world. It’s all about control with you, and everyone can see it.
America needs you to grow up, you petulant man-child.
It may also be worth noting, if you care about MAGA gossip, that Laura Loomer has been fanning the flames of this dispute, taking Musk’s side and basically calling St. Clair a golddigger. I only mention this because a few months ago, Loomer had a very public dispute with Elon Musk over immigration, which led to Musk, at one point, trying to control her by deactivating her premium X account and canceling her subscribers. I assume his efforts worked, because she’s now sh**-stirring on his behalf.
