Review: 'Hobbs & Shaw' Is a Popcorn Film with No Butter or Salt
It was inevitable, really. At some point, the ever-expanding Fast and Furious universe would just become too big, too star-packed, too much. Overflowing with muscles and machismo, the only way to bleed some of that gasoline-infused testosterone was to branch out. It was already apparent, based on not-so-secret reports, that relations were strained between competing lead actors Vin Diesel and Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson. Perhaps the only solution was to give Johnson’s international super-agent Luke Hobbs his own film, allowing more room for him to flex his attitude … and arms.
Who better to accompany him than villain-turned-recalcitrant-hero Deckard Shaw, played with sneering, sarcastic smoothness by Jason Statham. Statham was far too popular an actor to be a one-off in the Fast and Furious franchise, and so - despite cold-bloodedly murdering fan-favorite Han in Fast & Furious 6 — he underwent a somewhat baffling redemption arc and became a reluctant ally. Taking two of the most charismatic protagonists from the franchise and giving them their own picture seemed a no-brainer.
Thus bringing us to Hobbs & Shaw, which teams the two titular heroes up to take on a mysterious techno-cabal of international terrorists, led by a genetically enhanced super-villain — the preposterously named Brixton Lore (Idris Elba). Brixton is hunting Shaw’s sister, Hattie (Vanessa Kirby, who should have her own franchise), a government agent carrying a super-virus (you’ll notice a lot more “super” being tossed around), and it’s up to Hobbs and Shaw to team up with Hattie, stop the bad guy, and save the world.
On paper — and even in previews — it seems like a recipe for success. And in many ways, it is! The action scenes are wild and breathless, and the banter between Shaw and Johnson is fast and … uh … fun. Let’s go with fun. Mostly. But … there’s something missing here, something that causes the film to lack the warm fuzziness of the other films in the franchise. It took some ruminating to figure out what it is, and it essentially comes down to a few issues that prevent the film from having any real impact.
- The increased reliance on technology and military might. I understand that the franchise has evolved from “guys racing cars and having adventures.” But in recent entries, they’ve strayed farther and farther away from this group of underground renegades to the point where we’re now watching an entire film that’s just … government agents. That’s everyone in Hobbs & Shaw. This series used to be about sticking it to The Man. Now it literally is about The Man. There’s something just … off about that. This is less a story of plucky heroes and more an overblown ode to the military-industrial complex.
- Along those lines, the overall strength and firepower of the heroes. Look, I get it. The heroes of this universe don’t wear capes and don’t fly but make no mistake — the characters have become superheroes. Dominic Toretto can inexplicably take on a superspy in hand-to-hand combat. Tej can suddenly hack any computer. Lettie can fight off a small army of professional bodyguards. And throughout it all, I was cool with it. But now … we’re actually starting to become real superheroes. Hell, they’re literally fighting a supervillain! And … that’s not what I’m here for. I’ve got actual superhero movies for that fix.
- But most of all, Hobbs & Shaw has no heart. It’s emotionally hollow, a skeleton wearing the uniform of a Fast & Furious film but lacking any of its joy or appeal. Yes, when Vin Diesel would give one of his interminably cheesy speeches about family, we rolled our eyes. But there was always a kind of goofy sweetness to that whole idea, that this ragged band of misfits and idiots, even when they were doing the impossible, were brought together through uncommon bonds forged of fire and metal and, yes, love. When Hobbs & Shaw tries for it, it’s a miserable failure. Shaw’s relationship with Hattie never really engages the audience, and there’s no sense that they ever really even liked each other, let alone cared for each other. Hobbs is given a rushed, nonsensical backstory that’s basically an excuse to bring him back to Samoa to stage a big fight scene, and it never feels honest. Perhaps that’s the problem — the film wants us to feel the same warmth and affection for its characters, but they’ve never put in the work to earn it. When Dom talks about family, you feel it from seeing six or seven movies about it. When Hobbs does it, you just sort of quizzically knit your eyebrows.
Is Hobbs & Shaw entertaining? Yes, it is. Not throughout, but it’s certainly prime summer fodder. But is it good? Not really. It takes too many shortcuts and fails to give its characters any real appeal, which is shocking given the stars attached. It ratchets the machismo up to unbearable levels, turning Johnson into a caricature of gross manliness (there’s a particularly unappealing scene where he taunts Shaw by talking about what he would do, sexually, with his Hattie — as she sleeps right next to them). The film dumps a few ineffective cameos (OK, some of them work well) in to try to spruce things up, but it just never elevates it high enough. And sure, the other films aren’t objectively “good” either, but they’re fun and enjoyable and rewatchable. Hell, I own all of them and watch them regularly. This one? I guess if I can’t find the remote, I’d stick with it on a lazy Saturday on cable. And sadly, that’s the best I can say.
Header Image Source: Universal
- Review: 'Hobbs & Shaw' Is a Popcorn Film with No Butter or Salt
- Jessica Simpson and Pink Have Banded Together Over Hair
- The 2019 Pajiba Ten: The 10 Brainiest, Most Lustful Celebrities on the Planet
- What's Streaming This Month? Victorian Fairies, a Few Gelfling, and the Gorgeous Ladies of Wrestling
- Review: Jennifer Kent’s ‘The Nightingale’ is a Thoroughly Brutal Film That Challenges Our Understanding of a Rape Revenge Story