web
counter
 

Jon Stewart's Rally to Restore Sanity Speech

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Videos | Comments (43)



1030-colbert-stewart-getty-credit.jpg

“… I can’t control what people think this was. I can only tell you my intentions. This was not a rally to ridicule people of faith, or people of activism, or to look down our noses at the Heartland, or passionate argument, or to suggest that times are not difficult and that we have nothing to fear- they are, and we do. But we live now in hard times, not end times. And we can have animus and not be enemies. But, unfortunately, one of our tools in delineating the two broke. The country’s 24-hour politico-pundit-perpetual-panic-conflictinator did not cause our problems, but its existence makes solving them that much harder.

… If we amply everything, we hear nothing.”









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Greatest Trick the Devil Ever Pulled Was Convincing the World He Didn't Exist | A Weekend Comment Diversion | Jon Hamm Kisses Jason Sudeikis and We Still Can't Muster Any Enthusiasm | The Lowlights of Last Night's "Saturday Night Live"









Comments

Gotta say I was disappointed. The whole was just so...vague. It was all a plea for civility, which is fine I guess, but is this really the problem with our country? Lack of civility? It just seems like a copout, like racism and discrimination and populist rage and horrible economic policies aren't important - just be nice about it!

Really? I just don't get it.

Posted by: DamnYankees at October 30, 2010 4:21 PM

Points for effort, I guess.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 30, 2010 4:26 PM

see thing is his point is an attempt to motivate people who are resentful into demanding a shift in the tone of the national conversation by the middle class consumers in an attempt to officate a change in the manner in which Washington does business through scrutiny in a constuctive intelligent way

or somethign like that

it doesn't lend itself in any way to a big show of rhetoric but they all gave it a bleedin good go

won't begrudge him none of the success he had and may have

Posted by: PyD at October 30, 2010 4:37 PM

That's what we need. Actual dialogue. In a perfect world, the moderates would stand up and throw both the Right and Left out of the government in the interest of getting things done.

But the moderates actually have lives. We're busy being the engine of the goddamn economy, and we don't have enough time left to have a voice.

There's a LOT more to it than that, but one of the ways to solve our problems would be to stop screaming and start talking.

Believe it or not, but at least a little of that used to get done in Washington, before the 24-hour news cycle meant that every elected official was jetting home every weekend instead of forming some camaraderie with the other side of the aisle, and that every moment was a moment on camera, campaigning for the next election.

Posted by: ZombieScientist at October 30, 2010 4:39 PM

And Olbermann tweets: "Not ME! I'm HELPING! Stewart is SO wrong!" Thus demonstrating that yes, the media does think it's all about them. Which is the problem, ain't it?

Posted by: swampthing at October 30, 2010 4:46 PM

I was impressed. I think Stewart did a very good job of making what has always been his central point about the need for actual discourse.

Posted by: Royalewithcheese at October 30, 2010 4:52 PM

The rally itself was meh, it definitely started off weak. (Well, John Legend and The Roots were awesome, but Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman were rough going.) Really, it started getting entertaining when Colbert rose up from under the stage like a Chilean miner. I dug the Cat Stevens/Ozzy Osborne schtick and the various medals awarded. Mavis Staples was great. But, yeah, it was odd in that none of it really gelled with an overarching message.

Still, the speech at the end was wonderful. I've no problem with a comedian going earnest. In fact, like so many before him, it may have been one of his career's best moments. Good on you, Dustin, for letting Stewart speak for himself.

Posted by: RobP at October 30, 2010 4:56 PM

Big MEH! I’m really sick of this false equivalency assigned to “both sides”. It’s all bullshit.

On one side you’ve got Limbaugh wanting the President to fail. You’ve got Beck calling the President racist, comparing him to Hitler and Nazis and all manner of awful things, inciting violence. There is Angle with her “2nd amendment remedies” and people who bring guns to political events. There is Palin, who praises ignorance, and Rand Paul supporters who turn to violence. False accusations against ACORN, a company that registered minorities to vote. Yet, Halliburton, a company that killed soldiers and is responsible for the BP spill, and Blackwater, a company that killed innocent Iraqis are all going strong. Birthers and Truthers and people who outright lie about everything the President has done in the last two years.

And the other side? There is Code Pink and Joy Behar calling Angel a bitch. And that’s somehow the same? That’s how you equate extremism on both sides? Bullshit, I say.

We excuse war crimes and let criminal activities not be prosecuted and the Right gets more outrageous every single day, yet Stewart says that both sides need to chill? He’s a bit off.

Posted by: Scully at October 30, 2010 5:02 PM

"We live in hard times, not end times."

Best quote

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at October 30, 2010 5:13 PM

YES!!! My 15 min delay bit me in the ass at the height of this speech...he gave me goosebumps!

Posted by: anitra at October 30, 2010 5:23 PM

@Scully:

My take on Stewart telling both sides to chill is that if the right perceives it as mostly directed against them, they'll be less likely to pay attention to it. When it's delivered about all parties in the discussion, it's much more persuasive to center-right (or center-left) people who would be alienated otherwise.

Posted by: Royalewithcheese at October 30, 2010 5:26 PM

@Scully It's that sweeping generalization of the Right wing you just made (based off the loudest and dumbest of the far-right) that is why BOTH SIDES need to chill.

Posted by: Littlejon2001 at October 30, 2010 5:33 PM

@Littlejon2001

What Scully did was the exact opposite of a sweeping generalization - it was a list of very specific things.

Posted by: DamnYankees at October 30, 2010 5:35 PM

If I told you that all black men are criminals and "backed it up" with a short, specific list of crimes black men have committed, would I be less of a racist?

It was a sweeping generalization because, as Stewart even said, he is labeling the Right Wing as bigots, racists, and egregious provocateurs based off the actions of far-right political pundits.

Posted by: Littlejon2001 at October 30, 2010 5:41 PM

Let's not act like the media stations that aren't Fox News are pinnacles of news reporting, shall we? Yes yes, we all know Fox News hires people like Beck, O'Reilly, Hannity, Bachmann, etc. Does MSNBC get a pass when they have people like Matthews, Schultz and Olbermann? Should CNN be taken seriously when they allow idiots like Rick Sanchez and hacks like Anderson Cooper? Why does CBS even put this kid on the air??

Point is, he's not equating the extremism, he's just saying that both sides have their name-callers and fear-mongers, their inanity and their insanity. If one side does it crazier and louder, you don't have to respond with equal fervor, you can just ignore it. Don't give credence to ramblings, wild assumptions, name-calling and fear-logic by retorting. Talk about something worth talking about. Report the news without adding an opinion or adding a "Could you be NEXT?" hook at the end. That's all.

Look, I thought the rally was a little bit weak, too. But I do think it was a good try, and I think it's good that we have someone that people generally consider to be from one side of the political spectrum saying these things, not excusing "his side" in favor of bashing the other side.

Posted by: toomin at October 30, 2010 5:45 PM

@Royalewithcheese:

Yes, thank you.

Posted by: toomin at October 30, 2010 5:47 PM

So far I've seen three commenters that understand the point that Stewart was making with his speech. The rest of the commenters are too busy trying to think of their retort to *listen* to what Stewart is really saying. The mouths are already open, the hackles are already up, and the fingers are already throwing off beams of self-righteousness at the other side.

The point is if that we all just close out mouths for a second, open our ears and our minds, and LISTEN we might hear what the other person is trying to say and where they are coming from. Will we all agree if we do that? Fuck no. But what we will do is maybe stop judging the other side with what is the equivalent of the childish thought "I'm RIGHT and you're WRONG and there is NO middle ground on which we can meet and therefore you're a BAD person. I'm taking my toys and GOING HOME because you're MEANIE" and what we will start doing is getting some shit done and fixing the mess we're in.

Sounds a lot like what my dad used to say when my brother and I squabbled as kids. Now, isn't that funny.

Posted by: stardust at October 30, 2010 6:08 PM

Extra points for managing to dig up Father Guido Sarducci. I thought Don Novello was dead.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 30, 2010 6:41 PM

BarbadoSlim:

I was surprised too. Someone needs to reconnect him with Lorne Michaels.

Posted by: Jerry at October 30, 2010 7:23 PM

Uh, yeah, Scully, my Dearest...
(Yeah, yeah... I'm making up the couch as I say this...)

BOTH sides need to chill.

Posted by: Mulder at October 30, 2010 7:28 PM

Someone needs to reconnect him with Lorne Michaels.
Posted by: Jerry at October 30, 2010 7:23 PM

I know, right. Back in those days when he was one it was weird 'cause Novello wasn't really one of the players, more like a recurring guest comic, he would even do stand-up. And he wasn't the only one there were others. Just another reminder of how SNL *USED* to do different, experimental, things.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 30, 2010 7:37 PM

I gotta say that the amount of progressive pundit butthurt on Twitter was a thing of beauty today and if that is all that the Rally accomplished I would be happy.

But no, no there will be more.
Peggy Noonan will write how concerned she is that no one really knows what the rally was about and George Will is going to complain about all those young folks on the Mall in jeans and David Corn will write more about how the rally sucked because Stewart did not go after the right.
Bah!
Just shut up for awhile and listen to the sane people in the middle will you.

Posted by: Jules at October 30, 2010 8:04 PM

I was there. It was awesome. And now I'm drunk thast is all!!!!

Posted by: Monica at October 30, 2010 9:07 PM

Rally had it's weak points, with Stewart's speech IMHO the high point. He really nailed it and it gave me that warm tingly feeling while he was speaking.

Also when they brought out R2 D2 I just burst out laughing.

Posted by: Ken Hart at October 30, 2010 9:31 PM

This was great -- too bad his speech will fall on deaf ears.

The sheer insanity of the far right that is filling comment sections on various political and news sites regarding this rally sadly proves that this may already be the case.

Posted by: Hoju at October 30, 2010 9:48 PM

Respectfully, I disagree with Stewart. We face a grave crisis of political and economic leadership that is being held accountable by a spineless and hopelessly corrupt journalistic class. Even their faux-outrage barely registers with an American culture that is so self obsessed and willfully ignorant that most can name the cast members of the Jersey Shore, but not their elected representatives. We are living in the end times - the end of the United States' effective representative government, economic dominance, and cultural relevance. I guess I'm happy for Stewart, we might as all watch his orgy porgy and have a good laugh.

Posted by: T at October 30, 2010 10:45 PM

Yeah, there are many Progressives that need to stop complaining. All this bullshit about the President not accomplishing enough and not being forecful with his agenda (e.g. Stewart calling the Health Care Reform "timid") is stupid and unhelpful. Yes, they should shut up and deal with the fact that the President has done a lot with the current Congress.

I'm simply talking about the "the Left is just as bad as the Right" equivalency that media likes to preach. Stewart is part of that. And that's part of the problem.

*I am drunk. Please disregard any mistakes.*

Posted by: Scully at October 30, 2010 11:39 PM

Scully

I understand your point that people shouldn't criticize Obama's accomplishments, but I have to disagree with you to some extent. As long as he continues to support unlawful detention and assassination programs against American citizens, I will question him not matter what anyone says. I find that inexcusable, and he should do more.

To me, Stewart's point isn't that both sides are equal. I also think that the right wing has far more to answer for, overall. I think that the point is more that I, as a person, need to make myself willing to consider that a particular right-wing person I meet shouldn't just be discounted because of his or her stance. He or she may not deserve it, but we will all be better off for taking such an approach. However, that does not mean that we should cut any slack for the people who are actually responsible for perpetrating the horrible things that you list.

Posted by: phaedawg at October 31, 2010 2:31 AM

Stewart/Colbert 2012. Lets fucking do it.

Posted by: Taylor Kozakar at October 31, 2010 2:40 AM

Thanks for embedding the video; I didn't get to watch yesterday. Now that I've watched it: Ugh. Go ahead and count me as one of the people who gets a sinking feeling whenever a comedian decides to get earnest and sanctimonious. Shut up and be funny, that's what you're getting paid for. (And no, Stewart gets no pass for trying to head off this criticism at the 55 second mark).

Methinks Mr. Stewart has read one too many "New York" magazine profiles gushing over how "important" he is. He believes his own hype.

Posted by: Big Dave at October 31, 2010 8:10 AM

I think the point that's being missed here was my favorite part of his whole speech, and the last line Dustin posted. "When we amplify everything, we hear nothing."

Culturally we're faced with politicians and "journalists" (and yes, I'm using air quotes because I mean the word in the very loosest sense) who grab on to a particular news item and decide it's worth a two minute slot on a 24 hour news channel, and that it's suddenly absolutely vital to the country that we address it right then, damnit.

Take all those two minute slots, minus time for commercials of course, over the course of a 24 hour day and however many news channels there are, plus your local news, plus internet feeds, plus even those pesky newspapers, and you have people completely overwhelmed by what someone else decides is important.

It's like walking in a daycare where every kid in the room is screaming. The workers tend to just continue to move calmly through their day, figuring out how to stop all the crying, but they know they can't stop it all. At some point the cacophony starts to be less urgent, and more just the background noise of the day. It's not that the workers don't care, it's just that it's not going to stop, so you might as well get used to it.

When everything is worth screaming about on whatever news channel of your choosing (and trust me, there is bias on all sides of this - it's not a conservative/liberal issue in the least) at some point a sane person stops paying attention to it. Again, it's not that you don't care, it's just being tired of having it shoved down your throat.

I loved watching the rally yesterday. Don't forget, these are also comedians and much of what we saw was intended to be funny. But funny can make you think. Funny can open your mind in the way that a suited talking head trying to tell us that land sharks will soon be taking over Congress may not. Humor breaks the ice. It allows us to address the ridiculousness of a situation, so we can focus on solutions.

I know this is long, but it's something I think is getting lost in everyone trying to support "their side" or attack "the other side."

Posted by: kellyo at October 31, 2010 9:30 AM

WRT the message of "Stop being assholes and act like mature, civil adults": Problem is, the people who get it don't need to hear it. And the people who need to hear it won't get it.

And until We the People (that's the American people, not the right-wing people or left-wing people) take back our government, then I fear we might just be on a dangerous path. So, how do we take back the government? Personally, I say we should vote out every incumbent. Every last fucking one of 'em, regardless of party. Those people are way too comfy in their cushy little ivory tower.

And while we're at it, shouldn't our government represent us instead of lawyers, doctors and political dynasties? Shouldn't there be some, oh.. I don't know... REGULAR PEOPLE in the Senate and the House?

For all the brilliance of our founding fathers, I don't think they ever considered the possibility of the career politician. Get rid of 'em all and start over. Vote on Tuesday. Forget parties. Vote out the incumbents. Get some new people in there. Godtopus knows, they couldn't do worse than what we have now.

Rant over.

Posted by: Hot Mother at October 31, 2010 9:35 AM

Politics is only a small part of it. If anything, it's a red herring.

Jon Stewart starting turning the corner from pure comedy to relevancy when his job forced him to observe the media in action:
"The pettiness of it, the strange lack of passion for any kind of moral or editorial authority, always struck me as weird. We felt like, we’re serious people doing an unserious thing, and they’re unserious people doing a very serious thing."

As I was just saying on another page, clean, trustworthy information is the lifeblood of representational government. And our media companies do NOT provide that.

All the horseshit our elected officials and the political parties are up to is secondary to that fact. They couldn't get away with what they do if we had honest communication about it.

Also, all the people who don't want their comedians to do anything but be a jester.... could you watch what he watches every day and do nothing at all? That's effectively giving it your blessing. He's effectively a whistle-blower on the media. And we need those.

Posted by: ZombieScientist at October 31, 2010 10:40 AM

"Extra points for managing to dig up Father Guido Sarducci. I thought Don Novello was dead."

Father Guido was on Colbert a few weeks ago.

Posted by: Jeff at October 31, 2010 11:04 AM

'Shouldn't there be some, oh.. I don't know... REGULAR PEOPLE...'

Perhaps they work at a gas station, drive a bus... something like that?

Posted by: H.B. Brimmbury at October 31, 2010 12:14 PM

For context, watch Jon Stewart rip Crossfire a new asshole back in 2004. This isn't new for John.

I'm with John. People need to chillax, though I do have to say that the people I see needing to chill the most is the right. Granted they're in the losing position for a few more days so they're going to be the loudest and the most displeased but you don't see members of the left forgetting that we're on the same team and curb stomping Tea Partiers.

Where I split with John is that I don't think he got to the real problem and thats that the media isn't angry and loud because it's displeased. It's angry and loud because that's what drives ratings. The corporations that own the media are profit driven and loud, angry hosts drive profits.

Corporations drive our political discourse and have for generations. Until that stops, we're all screwed.

Posted by: Lennon at October 31, 2010 1:25 PM

The rally was about sanity and fear. The fear part was decidedly stronger and more effective. There is no discourse at the local or national level as long as everything is driven by fear and loathing. It's Thompson without the nihlism. (sp?) We can and do work together as a country, it just doesn't make news as often. But, most importantly watch the fuck out for those flip flops.

Posted by: Mrcreosote at October 31, 2010 3:42 PM

I was reading a blog post the other day of an unrelated topic, but a line from the post has stuck in my mind since reading it, and it seems relevant to this discussion:

"I don't have to agree with people to learn how they would like to be treated."

The behavior in media punditry trickles down to everyday political discussions with civilians. Right now, that behavior is "If I disagree with you, I'm just going to talk louder and louder over you in order to silence you, and make you so flustered that you trip over your words and then I get to call you a hypocrite and completely discount you." It's madness. There is no respect anymore, and it's why both the right and the left are being increasingly defined by the loudest, most abrasive and obnoxious folks - the center/moderate ones are too civil and rational to be able to compete on television with some lunatic yelling in their faces.

Posted by: Amanda6 at October 31, 2010 4:27 PM

I was there, and there was something amazing about being on the National Mall with 100,000+ people. Jon's closing was the best part of the event. That, and the people next to us offering "Jump Rope with a Muslim (instead of jumping to conclusions." Double Dutch all day long. I appreciated that Stewart really hit on the current taste for painting all Muslims as terrorists. Seriously, if you listed to Hannity during the NYC cultural center craziness, it was like he was trying to start a race war. Stewart was right to hammer the hell out of that.

Posted by: Mulva at October 31, 2010 5:35 PM

/looks up

Stardust wins

/runs away from trying to talk about politics in the forum of a Pajiba comment thread, away from people voicing their opinions in opposition or pessimism to a speech about not being stupid.

/runs faster on account of starting to be pulled in...

Posted by: D-Day at November 1, 2010 11:16 AM

Fuck Stewart and anyone who buys his "This was not a rally to ridicule people of faith, or people of activism, or to look down our noses at the Heartland, or passionate argument" It is ONLY about doing that. the only reason they did it was because that jackass Beck did it.

Posted by: Jack Random at November 2, 2010 12:16 AM

I saw this clip from Keith Olbermann a couple of days ago, and I think he perfectly captures my feelings regarding the Rally to Restore Sanity. Here it is:

and in case that didn't work, here is the link:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#39959257

Posted by: Scully at November 6, 2010 1:03 PM

"Federal taxes last year when down for 98 percent of people, but when asked about this, only 12 percent of the Teabaggers thought this was the case. 88 percent of them had it wrong. And a spokesman for the Teabaggers said, 'We don’t want to just be taxed less. We want to be taxed less by a white guy." –Bill Maher

Posted by: bill press streaming at January 5, 2011 3:34 PM