web
counter
 

Hollywood Crazy: Where is the Line Between Entertainment and Tragedy?

By Courtney Enlow | Posted Under Think Pieces | Comments (42)



alg_today_charlie-sheen.jpg

For the past few weeks, national media has focused almost exclusively on the complete and total breakdown of Charlie Sheen. Between goddesses, tiger blood, potentially anti-Semitic name-calling and general winning, this spilling of human insanity has been, if we’re looking at face-value and being honest, pretty entertaining. But as we’ve headed into the third week, jobs have been lost, terms like “moral turpitude” have been thrown around and custody cases have been filed, at what point do things stop being funny?

It was 2007 when Britney Spears first began showing public signs of mental illness, but if you really look at her history, it started earlier, most obviously with her two day marriage to the non-Costanza Jason Alexander. When she married Kevin Federline, she seemed relatively well, but between visits from Child Protective Services, desperately emotional interviews and the now infamous Chaotic videos showing Britney in various stages of whacked out, it’s retrospectively clear she most likely wasn’t.

And, yet, when she was put in a treatment center, left and shaved her head, attacked a car with an umbrella, held her child hostage in a bathroom and got a 5150 hospitalization hold put on her, danced on MTV in a bra and underwear half asleep, and now exists in the childlike world of conservatorship while still being thrown onstage to perform for millions despite obviously having the inability to make decisions for herself, some how she is the joke. And she never stopped being one to the majority of people. Not even when things got so desperate and dire that things became tragic.

Society doesn’t just find entertainment in these situations when using the celebrity in question as the butt of a joke. Anna Nicole Smith lived in butt-of-the-joke-ville for most of her career before she died. Only when her son passed then she herself died a short time later was she receiving any kind of care for her fragile mental state. But it was her death that was used as entertainment, disguised as news. It’s hard to remember now in the days after the Michael Jackson media death blitz, but for about a month after the passing of Anna Nicole Smith, it was all anyone talked about in the news. It was an obsession.

So, when not even death can stop the circus, where is the line?

Mental illness is still not wholly respected or understood for much of the country. And when the ill person is a celebrity, somehow that lack of understanding and respect becomes more widespread, almost treated as a punishment. The standard line is “this is what they got themselves into by being famous,” but for so many of them, they never had a choice.

I’ve railed on the cruelty and completely legal act of child abuse that is child stardom, to much eye-rolling, but how do you expect someone like Britney Spears or Lindsay Lohan to just leave the spotlight and settle down in Louisiana or Long Island? They don’t know how. They never had to learn. They never had a single normal day of existence in their lives, and now we have watched them fall apart and become laughingstocks and we just expect them to leave? They can’t. I don’t know what they can do, but I know they can’t do that. It would be like sending a pampered cocker spaniel to live among wild wolves.

Now we have Charlie Sheen. Charlie Sheen, like Michael Jackson before him to some extent, has the added bonus of, as Warner Brothers accuses in their letter addressing his firing, “moral turpitude.” Charlie Sheen is an abusive, offensive individual who has brutalized women, abused crack like it was those aforementioned women, and existed as a complete affront to what it means to be a decent human being for his entire adult life. It’s just recently come to a head and is something we’re all seeing now. It’s not like any of this is new; it just wasn’t as big a deal when his cars went off cliffs or he missed work immediately following porn conventions.

I am on the record as accusing Charlie Sheen of being an evil idiot, and I have been, rightfully, accused of hypocrisy by some commenters. Why should Lindsay and Britney get the “get out of public scrutiny free” card for being raised by parental wrecks or having some form of mental illness untreated until she was a nearing-30 mother of two, respectively, while Charlie Sheen is just evil? And that’s fair. And now that the past few weeks has happened, I’m seeing that. Particularly now as he enters into the part that makes me sad—the joining in on the joke.

Some celebrities are able to laugh at themselves. Robert Downey, Jr. is fantastic at this. But when some people do it, it has the thick air of “this is only getting worse” around it. Lindsay Lohan will go on MTV or Jimmy Kimmel and make fun of herself for a few bucks and some airtime, but then will fire off a letter to Lorne Michaels for daring to make fun of her on his show entirely about making fun of people. Charlie Sheen now thinks “winning” is as hilarious as we did two weeks ago and is attempting to capitalize on it through t-shirts and a paid Twitter account. It’s that area where delusion and an unstoppable ego collide, and seeming self-awareness is not a sign of wellness or clarity.

So, what do we do? Nothing. Every single celebrity blog post or IMDb forum thread in history has received at least one comment saying “if you don’t like them, ignore them” or “why won’t s/he just go away?” That’s naive, and impossible. We can each of us rally together and ignore the sadness before us, but that won’t change the millions of people who won’t. It’s like Two and a Half Men. Not a single one of us knew why it lasted as long as it did; but it’s finally leaving. Whether those we watch through the glass leave quietly or much more tragically will be another story.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



In Solidarity With Women The World Over, Kate Winslet Debuts Her Worst Hair Day On The Cover Of Vogue | "Breakout Kings" Review: Hey! It's a Show. And It's On TV









Comments

For the line between entertainment and tragedy ask audiences at Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark

Posted by: Sara Tonin at March 8, 2011 2:13 PM

This is what finally flipped a switch for me:
http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2011/03/sheens_korner.html

Posted by: Marcela at March 8, 2011 2:18 PM

i watched a friend go through a similar "breakdown"... twice. watching charlie sheen and listening to the things he is saying is weird because my friend was talking the exact same way, spouting similar delusions of grandeur.

i've been mostly ignoring the news about sheen because i think it's tragic. it's not just drugs. he's got some sort of chemical imbalance and he needs psychiatric evaluation.

/armchair shrink.

Posted by: stopthemadness aka ABL at March 8, 2011 2:23 PM

His whole meltdown was funny for, like three days. At least for me, it was funny in the "Hoooooooooly shit what the fuck" uncomfortable awkward way that you do when the only other option is crying.

Now, it's annoying, troublesome and I just want him to stop and get whatever help he really needs.

I also want people to stop saying "DUH! WINNING!" all the time, especially people on the radio. This is why I listen to Pandora all the time, you radio DJ assholes!

Posted by: MeganTheFirst at March 8, 2011 2:33 PM

Oh my goodness, that UStream feed is eye-opening. Up until now I just thought he was an asshole, but there's clearly something wrong with him. He's moving around like he's got Parkinson's or something.

Posted by: Paul Southworth at March 8, 2011 2:39 PM

Look, I'm tired of people telling me I should feel sorry for him. He got paid $1.8 million an episode to show up and basically play himself. And he couldn't keep his shit together well enough to do that? No sympathy from me. I don't know if it is drugs, mental illness, or a combination of the two, but I'm looking forward to the day he either fades into the background or gets whatever help he needs so I don't have to hear about him anymore.

Posted by: fenchurch at March 8, 2011 2:43 PM

While I concur with most of what you've written, I take exception with the idea that the poor child stars can't be integrated back into a normal existence. Children are forced, by circumstance or parental issues to adapt to different lifestyles all the time; plenty end up horrendous places and still manage to come out the other side as decent human beings. I'm not going to feel badly for Lindsey or Britney because they got high on fame. Being put back into a regular existence might be just what they need.

Posted by: Cindy at March 8, 2011 2:50 PM

Martin should have pimp-slapped him before this even had a chance to start.

Posted by: The Wanderer at March 8, 2011 2:58 PM

So it’s not a good idea to drink Tiger blood?

Posted by: Pookie at March 8, 2011 2:58 PM

I'm sticking with him til the bitter sticky end.

/rocks the tiger blood

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at March 8, 2011 2:58 PM

Is this just a problem with celebrities? I think it's a pretty fair to say mental health care is not a priority for much of America. I, for one, have talked to doctors before trying to get a referral to a specialist to deal with severe depression and anxiety only to be told to "cheer up" and "act like a man." It literally took a trip to the emergency room caused by the worst panic attack I've ever had in my life to even get my family on board with possibly understanding something was wrong.

Until the nation as a whole starts to understand and respect mental health as a serious area of public health concern, these Charlie Sheens and Britney Spears will keep popping up. The mockery is sickening, but looking away isn't going to help anyone. Celebrities didn't get into the business to be harassed and mocked; they got into the business to be professional entertainers. Mocking their every problem, especially ones rooted in illness, is wrong. Period.

Posted by: Robert at March 8, 2011 3:00 PM

*applauds Robert*

And well done, Courtney.

Posted by: Sara H at March 8, 2011 3:16 PM

hmmm...clearly, i live under a rock (read: i don't give a shit) because this is the first i've read about his crazy town antics. blech. who fucking cares.

Posted by: sinclaire at March 8, 2011 3:18 PM

Just something to throw out there: stop caring about celebrities so much. As in, watch their work, but stop paying so much goddam attention to their personal lives in general. Whether it's praising them up, mocking them, making armchair diagnoses, or posting think-pieces about their lives, how about just stop.

What's the importance of it anyway? What does it actually bring to our lives? I'd have to argue nothing. Their work - whether it makes you dance, laugh, sing, cry, whatever... pay all the attention you want to that. It's made to be entertainment, so it'll either entertain you or you won't like it.

When it comes to paying attention to the personal affairs of celebrities, that's something that we've decided to turn into entertainment all on our own. It wasn't made to be entertainment, it's somebody's actual life. Trying to turn a life into another means of entertainment will eventually have repercussions, whether it be a breakdown from media coverage, or an explosion of attention which would lead to delusions of grandeur in the best of us. Personally, I don't think we have a right to slurp up every drop of information available on every star, and then at a time of our choosing, pretend we actually give a fuck. We don't. The fact that we're all talking about Charlie Sheen's mental/drug problems proves this. If anyone actually gives a fuck, they'll stop paying attention to him. Yes, millions more will, and no, ignoring it won't make it go away. But the less people who concern themselves with celebrities' lives, the less of this we'll see in the future.

Just my two cents.

Posted by: JB at March 8, 2011 3:22 PM

What is sadder than being entertained by an idvidual with severe mental illness is choosing to ignore that said individual beats women.

I think Charlie Sheen is a pile of shit and, while I'm not reveling in his public displays of psychosis, I am defriending any fucking dudebro that writes "Charlie Sheen is the best, man!" as their facebook status.

I don't understand how celebrities can "bounce back" from domestic violence and sexual assaults. Same goes for Chris Brown. He beat the shit out of his girlfriend and after a couple of years the young girls I work with are blasting his latest single on their iPhones. R. Kelly has sex with minors but it's okay because he has a series of really corny music videos. Mike Tyson? A rapist. But who cares! He likes pigeons

I had a good childhood friend whose dad beat her mom on a regular basis. After a 2 years in prison for assault there was no "Welcome Home" banner hanging in their living room. There was no "That's okay! All is forgotten!" because he loves his golden retriever.

Posted by: Natalia at March 8, 2011 3:29 PM

I agree 100% with fenchurch.

Posted by: Jadine at March 8, 2011 3:51 PM

To me, whether or not Charlie Sheen needs or deserves sympathy is a moot point. Every time I see a feature story on his latest insanity, all I think about is his poor father, who has done everything in his power to help his son, including having him arrested at one point. I think about the rest of his family and how sick at heart they must be feeling about this whole thing, how desperate they must be to get him some real help.

So, while I admit to having laughed incredulously at some of the things Charlie has said, the situation is not funny to me in a larger context. I hope his parents are able to save him. For their sake.

Posted by: noodlestein at March 8, 2011 4:01 PM

When it comes to paying attention to the personal affairs of celebrities, that's something that we've decided to turn into entertainment all on our own. It wasn't made to be entertainment, it's somebody's actual life.

bullshit. they turned their lives into entertainment. their personal lives are routinely put on display by their publicity and PR machines. they routinely call ahead to make announcements that they are going to be dining at the ivy or shopping at kitson. what do you think the oscars, and the grammys, and the emmys are all about? if it was just awards for "a job well done, old cha'" there'd be no need for a red carpet and 4 hour telecasts.

it's a spectacle that they've created and in turn a spectacle that the public eats up. celebs who don't want this attention find ways to get away from it (johnny depp and christian bale come to mind.) saying "just stop paying attention to it" is the same as saying to the celebs "just stop being an attention whore." it's a parasitic relationship which results in problems that can't be fixed by simply ignoring it, or snidely criticizing the author of a blog post and her commenters.

Posted by: stopthemadness aka ABL at March 8, 2011 4:13 PM

that should say "old chap" and i'm really living up to my moniker today.

grumpy lady is grumpy.

Posted by: stopthemadness aka Angry Black Lady at March 8, 2011 4:14 PM

What is the veracity estimate on the claims of mental illness? Isn't he just coked out of his mind?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at March 8, 2011 5:00 PM

There is a certain element of "OZ" in every celebrity.
I agree that if that's all you've ever known, you could be in trouble. There is an old anecdote about Bogart: "he's great until he's had too much to drink. Then he starts to think he's Bogart.".
Charlie Sheen's trouble is that he thinks he's Charlie Sheen.

Posted by: Odnon at March 8, 2011 5:07 PM

Beyond my primary interest- the long wished for death of the Show That Shall Not Be Named- I stopped watching this train-wreck two days after it broke. Sheen is either sick, an attention seeking dickhead or some loathsome combination of both but that isn't the reason I backed out.

Anyone with this kind of profile flaming out this publicly was bound to become fodder for every dj/late show/newsanchor/morning show moron/"morals campaigner"/etc searching for material. The race to saturation was bound to be short so I opted out early. Thats a beast I'm not interested in feeding

Posted by: Dave Shepherd at March 8, 2011 5:39 PM

Yeah, I've never found this whole spectacle particularly funny, but I still draw a very clear line between Sheen and the likes of Lohan and Spears. All three likely have some kind of addiction or other mental illness that ran unchecked for way too long, but neither Spears nor Lohan has a history of intentionally physically harming other human beings.

Posted by: Amanda6 at March 8, 2011 5:40 PM

and you're all still stalking\writing\thinking about him.
hypocrites.

Posted by: mothy at March 8, 2011 6:23 PM

The biggest problem for anyone- whether they be a family member, friend, acquaintance, fan or mildly concerned gawking enabler- is that none of these addicted and/or mentally ill people can get adequate help until one or both of these things happen:

1. They personally and truly desire to be helped; or
2. They end up in the legal system because they have harmed someone or something else AND they want to get better.

Its true there is hypocrisy in continuing to pay attention to Charlie Sheen as he unravels- whether writing a blog or a comment. But I know this is for certain: He'll continue to slide down the sober valley canyon no matter what you or I say.

Posted by: JuiceinLA at March 8, 2011 7:43 PM

also @Mrs. Julien- you are correct Madame! He exhibits all the physical and mental characteristics not only of being totally coked up, but of an addict's atrophied mind.

In my book, this circumstance doesn't warrant pity or absolve him of his crimes, its just an explanation.

Posted by: JuiceinLA at March 8, 2011 7:47 PM

But hey, at least somebody wrote a real-live opera about Anna Nicole.

Posted by: Jerry at March 8, 2011 8:01 PM

An ex of mine used to go on these benders that would always play out the same. He wanted, needed, HAD TO HAVE ATTENTION... so I'd end up babysitting him while he ranted and giggled and had revelations and epiphanies. By the time the drugs ran out (or I hid them) I would be so exhausted and stressed out that going back to work was like going to Disney Land.

Watching Charlie Sheen makes my chest feel tight in that same stressed out gotta-keep-him-calm way. This whole thing is a stark reminder of how great it is to not be involved with an addict.

Posted by: king at March 8, 2011 8:43 PM

How dare you compare cocker spaniels to Lindsay Lohan. Cockers are generally all-around awesome and can be taught useful tricks. Can Lindsay be trained to get a beer without making it an international disaster? I think not.

Posted by: dahlia6 at March 8, 2011 9:53 PM

"moral turpitude"??


Is it 1953 again?

Posted by: Mr. Stitch at March 8, 2011 10:31 PM

King, you captured my feelings PERFECTLY. After being married for 10 years to an addict...I can't stomach seeing that man. I react the same way I did when my ex would storm around the house, looking out the windows and making these grandiose statements.

It kills me that people find this man amusing.

Posted by: isaphoebe at March 8, 2011 11:27 PM

I hate to think what Frances Farmer's life would have been like had she been active in our time rather than way back when.

Posted by: Pat C. at March 9, 2011 12:32 AM

re: stardom being it's own reward/punishment.

Celebrity is a willing agreement between an undefined, but powerful group animus and an individual that represents a concept or ideal. No one can control it, in the same way you'll never speed up the traffic by reminding each person that gawking at the ambulance in the left-hand lane makes no sense and slows the rest of you down.

There's a willing relinquishment of control underway that allows groups of people to make the assumption that someone ELSE is running the show - which is why celebrities cannot control the crowd that chooses to shine their flashlights upon them. The celeb represents the idea, and once they deviate they fulfill another arc on a different set of ideals, and the transition between light and dark is the very best kind of human food.

I don't think you can blame celebs for being addicted to the fame, unless you also blame the individual for giving up their considered opinion to groupsway. And if you blame both, you're denying that celebrity is simply shorthand for higher forms of art, sound and theory - the kind you'll find in orchestra, theatre and novels.

We need it, these artistic interpretations on the theme of human experience, but it helps to decide logically where to place yourself on the spectrum - is Ophelia much different than Anna Nicole Smith? They both drowned from sadness and disconnect, didn't they?

Any attempt to complain that paying attention to the 'lower classes' is simply an attempt to sit higher on the intellectual totem pole.

Humph. That said - I am giving no shrift to this Sheen thing. I feel bad for his family, if anything.

Posted by: replica at March 9, 2011 2:34 AM

bullshit. they turned their lives into entertainment. their personal lives are routinely put on display by their publicity and PR machines.

Supply and demand. If we didn't want it, there'd be no reason for them to do that.
More than anything else, I see people finding some justification for saying "ignoring it won't help". If we're talking about mental illness, it's a correct statement. Celebrities lives.. bullshit. Then it's just an excuse to continue an obsession.

It wasn't always like this. Go back 12 or 13 years. Before reality TV, and before the Internet changed from something that a lot of people had access to into something that pretty much everyone did, it wasn't nearly as bad. We now have instant, unlimited access to this information, and we eat it up. At no point does anyone make a decision not to consume the constant PR. We just eat it up and judge it, creating more "controversy", and therefore more attention.

Attitudes spread through the public consciousness like wildfire. For every person that chooses not to eat up every bit of celebrity information, there are a number of friends, coworkers, etc. who will at least become aware that someone they respect has made this decision. If enough people actually cared enough to make this decision, and make it known, more people will realize that the reasons behind that decision line up with their own beliefs. If that could ever happen, then yes, ignoring it would eventually make it go away.

All I'm trying to convey in my long-windedness is that there IS a choice to participate or not. You call it a parasitic relationship, and that makes me wonder who the parasite in the relationship is. If it's the stars, then we can take away what they're relying on, leaving them to fend for themselves without us to leech off of. If it's us, then we can choose not to be parasites, and to somehow manage to live without it.

Posted by: JB at March 9, 2011 8:15 AM

I think we've created the celebrity-monster. I love reading autobiographies of Hollywood's early stars, basck in the days when studios would try to hush up the crazy before the ticket-paying audiences found out. These days it seems like execs encourage starfu**ing, lack of underwear, DUIs and all manner of crazy by rewarding the biggest famewhores with TV shows and film deals (as long as they're insurable). Cause crazy sells these days. And we buy it like pedophiles at a girl scout cookie sale marathon.

Posted by: cinekat at March 9, 2011 8:22 AM

I should also respond to this:
or snidely criticizing the author of a blog post and her commenters.

It isn't my intention to "snidely criticize" anyone. For one, I'm talking about a group of people that goes well beyond this post, its author, or the commenters, and secondly, I include myself in this group. (Not to mention the fact that Courtney is probably my favorite writer on Pajiba).

After reading the post and comments, I just feel like something fundamental is missing from the standpoint we're taking here, namely, honestly questioning our own roles in this sort of spectacle. I've always been for questioning what's behind my own opinions and those of my friends, and I think it's a healthy thing to do in any serious discussion.

Yes, it's gotten me into trouble before, but my intention is never to attack anyone. Rather, it's to get people (myself included) to challenge themselves.

Posted by: JB at March 9, 2011 9:00 AM

You can say you don't like it. You can list the number of reasons it's offensive and in bad taste. But it's baffling to me that a person who seems to be a professional writer on the topic of popular entertainment claims not to understand why Two And A Half Men has been a successful program.

Posted by: Oh That Man at March 9, 2011 10:21 AM

Former child stars have always had a reputation for going off the deep end once they got older. Probably the most well-known example would be the kids from "Diff'rent Strokes", but go back far enough and you have the original Alfalfa dying in a bar brawl.

Posted by: Craig at March 9, 2011 10:22 AM

Amanda6, I think you hit the nail on the head. Yes, Charlie Sheen is sick (whether mentally ill or just a severe addict, he's still sick) but that does not, in any way, excuse his history of abuse and violence, especially towards women. That's why I'm willing to just feel kind of sorry for Lindsay Lohan and Britney Spears, but still loathe Charlie Sheen, even though all three of them clearly have some level of mental illness.

Posted by: GwenBear at March 9, 2011 2:16 PM

I have nothing but utter contempt for paparazzi and the obsession of Americans with celebrities' personal lives. I don't think its naive to want and change the way America contributes to the complete and utter breakdown of human beings. We idolize people and then we rip them apart just for the fun of it.

I personally hate the hypocrisy (especially from young females) of criticizing and insulting child stars like Miley Cyrus for their inappropriate behavior. I think it's awfully funny how young women are quick to call Miley Cyrus a slut for pics of her that circulate on the internet and then go out and do things just as "slutty" if not much worse than Miley's public provocative behavior. I completely agree with you Courtney that child stardom is legalized child abuse. Can anyone really deny the fact that Michael Jackson was so messed up because of him NEVER having a normal life? I think its public knowledge.

And yet here people go again, criticizing Justin Bieber for his comments on Abortion. The kid is 15/16 yrs old giving an honest opinion to a controversial question he should never have been asked in the first place. What an awful thing fame is to have your every move, decision, opinion, and mistake be publicly broadcasted and condemned by every person with access to a television or newspaper.

It is for this reason I refuse to watch MTV or VH1. When I catch myself watching Entertainment Tonight, TMZ, or any of those garbage shows I quickly turn the channel. I don't contribute to it, or at least I try my best not to give the slightest support to paparazzism. It's wicked. It's wrong.

Hell, I'm guilty of it too I know that. But it's not naive to try and stop this thing that most people know in their hearts is wrong.

Posted by: Littlejon2001 at March 9, 2011 2:51 PM

I had similar thoughts after the Mel Gibson tapes triggered months of depression and amped up my PTSD. Thanks for the reminder. Not entertainment.

Posted by: Frankly at March 10, 2011 7:39 PM

I'm tired of people telling me I should feel sorry for him. He got paid $1.8 million an episode to show up and basically play himself. And he couldn't keep his shit together well enough to do that? No sympathy from me. I don't know if it is drugs, mental illness, or a combination of the two, but I'm looking forward to the day he either fades into the background or gets whatever help he needs so I don't have to hear about him anymore.

Posted by: cosplay wigs at April 5, 2011 5:30 AM