web
counter
 

This Collection of 'I'd Rather Be Naked' Ads Is Not an Endorsement of PETA; It's an Endorsement of Nudity (Slightly NSFW)

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Seriously Random Lists | Comments (57)



alicia-silverstone-peta.jpg

enhanced-buzz-21601-1326450966-9.jpg

Kristy Turlington.jpg

jamie-bamber.jpg

Jenna-Dewan-Tatum-Goes-Nude-For-PETA-Ad.jpg

steve-o-peta.jpg

taraji_p_henson_peta_fur_ad.jpg

Pop_Crunch_rights_64953_nude_nia_long_peta_ad_campaign_photo.jpg

Celebs-go-nude-for-PETA.jpg

christian-serrators-naked-peta.jpg

slideshow_1366235_gonzalezPETA-300.JPG

kristen-johnston-nude-peta.jpg

evaMendesNakedFur.jpg

karina-smirnoff-nude-peta.jpg

duff-susan-mckagan-peta-sm.jpg

Bethenny-Frankel-PETA-Nude-Ad.jpg










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Effects of Vaginal Stimulation on Pain Tolerance | "You Opposite of a Turd With Eyes." Highlights from NBC's Thursday Night Comedies









Comments

"Slightly" NSFW? Y'all are KILLING me with the naked people posts on here this week. :p Every time I open the main page I have to scroll like the dickens.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at January 13, 2012 11:09 AM

Wait, are these ads for PETA or Fotoshop - by Adobé?

Posted by: lubeg at January 13, 2012 11:17 AM

I'm with MelBivDevoe. Also, holy Adobé Photoshop, Batman!

Posted by: PerpetualIntern at January 13, 2012 11:20 AM

NO FUR! Leather is total cool though.

Posted by: admin at January 13, 2012 11:25 AM

Hello Jamie Bamber! I approve of PETA solely based on this image.

Posted by: Luke at January 13, 2012 11:32 AM

Easy for that chick in the dude sandwich to say 'no fur' when she insists on walking around clothed in naked men, who, by the way, must now have the most breeze-blasted arses this side of a Sexy Antarctic Scientists 2012 calendar.

McKagan's still a badass. Maybe more so now.

Posted by: zeke the pig at January 13, 2012 11:35 AM

Where's the nudity? My eyes must not be calibrated to this new form of covered nakedness

I guess my definition of nudity is the old fashioned, art-school version

Posted by: Whipple "Whip" Hoxworth at January 13, 2012 11:36 AM

My what cynical times we live in, when literal "bare ass naked" isn't enough for people anymore.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at January 13, 2012 11:44 AM

The chick in the INK ad is the creepiest thing I've seen all day.

Pardon my naivete, but what makes horse drawn carriages cruel, specifically? Are we making assumptions about their treatment "off duty", or is it purely that they aren't free to run wild? I'm sure I'm missing something...

Posted by: Patty O'Green at January 13, 2012 11:54 AM

I'm pretty sure most of these people would rather go naked than were just about anything.

Posted by: Captain Tuttle at January 13, 2012 11:56 AM

That would be "wear."

Posted by: Captain Tuttle at January 13, 2012 11:57 AM

If I looked like those women, that would likely be my choice too. I've always said that if I had a great body, I would dress like a complete slut.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at January 13, 2012 12:00 PM

Patty, don't try to understand PETA's reasoning. They are insane.

Not that I'd endorse fur clothing.

Posted by: FabMax at January 13, 2012 12:12 PM

I want a suit made of naught but sea-kitten fur!

Posted by: admin at January 13, 2012 12:14 PM

And a suit of land mermaids.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at January 13, 2012 12:25 PM

Brilliant that their campaign repeatedly uses the line:"Be comfortable in your own skin and let animals keep theirs" when, clearly, most of these pictures, if not all of them, have been shopped to hell and back. Then again, it's not like I expect sincerity or honesty from PETA.

Posted by: PETA so lolzy at January 13, 2012 12:26 PM

Okay, you should not be naked on the subway. If you find yourself in this situation, you should not bust out your pole dancing skills, even if you are wearing the shoes for it. Just grab the Times and try to look nonchalant. Maybe no one will notice.

Posted by: Monchichi at January 13, 2012 12:30 PM

Patty O'Green, I just assume that it's "cruel" to make a work animal actually, you know, work.

Posted by: elsie at January 13, 2012 12:38 PM

Is it bad that my only thought in seeing these was "OhmyGOD, they're gonna catch so many diseases!"

They'll probably SPREAD a shitton of diseases, too. Eewwwww.

Posted by: figgy at January 13, 2012 12:38 PM

Agreed Monchichi. My first thought was, "Oh God, now you have the clap!"

Posted by: Patty O'Green at January 13, 2012 12:44 PM

I suspect Steve-O doesn't care about fur. Steve-O just wants to get nekkid.

Don't we all?

No?

Oh.

Alright, carry on then.

Posted by: Zirze at January 13, 2012 12:47 PM

I don't know if I should be happy I don't know most of these people or even find most of them that attractive naked (except for Mendes and Bamber).

Mmmhhh... Hold me, Apollo, and let my spine glow...

Posted by: FDBluth at January 13, 2012 1:03 PM

Jamie Bamber and Eva Mendes should go naked at all times. Preferably around my room. While, I think Peta are a bunch of muppets, I have nothing against this campaign.

Posted by: Joker at January 13, 2012 1:04 PM

So all these ladies are clean shaven, then?

Mental note taken.

Funny, I don't recall Tony Gonzalez refusing to play with leather (foot)balls. "Wear your own skin and let animals wear those", my ass.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 13, 2012 1:31 PM

Karina, those aren't leather soles are they?

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 13, 2012 1:33 PM

Fine by me. Just keep your paws off my dolphin-skin coat and my orca-skin floor covering (cleans up super-easy!).

Posted by: klingonfree at January 13, 2012 1:44 PM

Is Nia Long even in the same photograph as the pole? The whole thing looks like a collage. The lighting and shadows are all wrong.

Posted by: BWeaves at January 13, 2012 1:48 PM

First of all, Duff McKagan WTF OMG what? He still exists?

Second, I believe that people who are against horse drawn carriages believe that it is cruel to have horses in such close proximity to cars, which causes them anxiety, and has a possibility of causing serious injury.

Posted by: MM at January 13, 2012 1:51 PM

"I'd rather engage in prolonged hours of anal sex with Eva Mendes than wear fur."

There's my ad.

Posted by: Juicy Weatherbee at January 13, 2012 1:57 PM

Nia Long's thighs and calves shouldn't be melding into the pole right?

Posted by: ArmaAngelus at January 13, 2012 2:05 PM

I read the other day that a few horses in NYC keeled over during their work shifts last summer. I guess there's issues with overwork and especially with starving them and heatstroke. Don't take my word for it though, since I'm not sure of the actual statistics.

Posted by: PerpetualIntern at January 13, 2012 2:16 PM

Also, how the HELL did I get on Change.org's mailing list? I think that's where I hear about all the dead horses and puppies and kittens and such. Must unsubscribe. Ignorance is bliss.

Posted by: PerpetualIntern at January 13, 2012 2:17 PM

I don't know who Christian Serratos is, but I think she caused me some chafing of my own skin. Where's PETA now?

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 13, 2012 2:20 PM

The Nia Long one is fan-made right?


I like the Eva Mendes one. Hubba-hubba, and may I add hubba.

Posted by: Junierizzle at January 13, 2012 2:24 PM

Nia's right arm is suffering from some major atrophy. She should start up a baby seal clubbing regimen immediately.

Posted by: jon29 at January 13, 2012 2:28 PM

Fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfpafpafpfapfapfapfapfapfap.

Posted by: Snackpit at January 13, 2012 2:39 PM

There's nothing wrong with using animals for the purposes of advancing society, improving medicine, performing labor, warmth, or nutrition.

There is something wrong with the people who advocate against that.

I know which side of the debate I'm on, though it doesn't make Ted Nugent's music any less masturbatory.

Posted by: Devil Child at January 13, 2012 2:48 PM

Ah, I'm starting to see the picture. It sounds like horse-drawn carriages CAN be cruel. So can going to the movies, if you're next to the douche who keeps texting or if you're behind a chronic farter. Obviously I mean one who farts chronically, not one who expels marijuana plumes from their backside. Because I think I would sit behind that guy. Can you imagine? What were we talking about? Oh look, a chicken...

Posted by: Patty O'Green at January 13, 2012 2:55 PM

What the hell is UP with Eva Mendes' left wrist and hand? bad, bad, photoshop.

Posted by: bokchoi at January 13, 2012 4:14 PM

PETA kills more animals in a year then I will eat in a lifetime. hypocritical douche taints.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 13, 2012 4:25 PM

@Patty: I think what it boils down to is that PETA -- or, at least, Ingrid Newkirk -- believes animals should have the same equal rights and protections as human beings. If it were up to her, we wouldn't have pets, because owning an animal is just another form of slavery. So, yeah, any horse but a wild horse is a slave.

PETA getting what they want would basically amount to a 12 Monkeys-ish paradise. Still, this is much better than their "Sea Kitten" campaign.

Posted by: RobP at January 13, 2012 4:34 PM

Karina's ad is pretty cute, actually...and probably the least photoshopped of all the women.

Posted by: MissAmynae at January 13, 2012 5:05 PM

guess who was the first one to show up for this?

(Ans: Olivia 'Look at me! Look at me! LOOK. AT. ME.' Munn)

Posted by: haplo at January 13, 2012 5:09 PM

The high today was 9 degrees F, you want to go naked, you go right ahead. I am however quite toasty.

Posted by: clancys_daddy at January 13, 2012 6:51 PM

Eva Mendes needs to get out in the sun more, she's veering off into another ethnicity.

And I like the bunny.
... no one else noticed the bunny, I bet.

Posted by: Rooks at January 13, 2012 7:58 PM

Never get into a land war with Russia in the winter, never go against a Sicilian when death is on the line, and never do what a naked Steve-O is doing.

Posted by: Bert at January 13, 2012 8:28 PM

Zeke, that's no chick in a dude sandwich, she's a sugar-coated Sataness sandwich.

Posted by: Stinky at January 13, 2012 9:32 PM

Olivia Munn has a very unfortunate face.

Posted by: stump at January 13, 2012 9:43 PM

PETA can jump up my fur-lined arsehole. I'd rather be a pet.

Posted by: Stinky's Cat at January 13, 2012 9:51 PM

They are like two ad campaigns away from just fucking animals already.

Posted by: googergieger at January 13, 2012 10:39 PM

Some excellent asses and a bunch of Who?

So ... bunch of asses.

Posted by: , at January 14, 2012 1:37 AM

Life is sometimes boring. Have you ever felt that something wonderful should be injected? Come--onenightcupid.com--, you are bound to find your saucy match with hundreds of thousands of cute guys and pretty girls from around the world eager for hookups, one night stands, and discreet affairs!

Posted by: Alice at January 14, 2012 8:02 AM

@RobP, that's not exactly right. For PETA, animals should have more rights than humans.

As I said: insane.

Posted by: FabMax at January 14, 2012 8:56 AM

I'm not one way or the other on fur, but this ad campaign makes me wish I could somehow encourage Hayden Panettiere and Kristen Bell to take a more active role in PETA

Posted by: Spiffy McFly at January 14, 2012 9:08 AM

Oh no, now I can't stop looking at Eva Mendes's ('s?) left wrist/hand/arm/flipper. Her sly smile makes sense now, as she is clearly an alien/demon/body snatcher who has infiltrated human society and is on the brink of revealing her true nature by uncovering that left wrist/hand/arm/flipper and then hinging her jaw open and devouring the photographer, triggering the alien/demon/body snatcher army to invade Earth and destroy us all.

Sorry, I got lost in my own little world there. Do aliens have the same rights as humans, too? Peta must have a position on this.

Posted by: Return of Santitas at January 14, 2012 11:08 AM

Some of the comments in this thread had me curious enough to go to the PETA website. I can't find any reference to them wanting to get rid of all pets, nor that they think that animals deserve more rights than humans. So: somewhat disappointed I couldn't gawk at their foolishness in the 10 minutes I took to fact-check. Frustrating.

Fun fact: they claim on one page that in the U.S. somewhere there are people euthanizing unwanted/unclaimed pets, not with lethal injection, but with BULLETS. As in, shot from a gun. Can that possibly be true??? Like they're putting a last cigarette in the kitty's mouth then taking him out behind the chemical shed and shooting him??? That's both horrifying and awesome.

Posted by: malechai at January 14, 2012 8:18 PM

I know Eva Mendes looks good, but how can we ignore Taraji P. Henson?

I WANT THAT. I wanna bite that tattoo ...

Posted by: exploranora at January 14, 2012 9:30 PM