web
counter
 

The 10 Biggest Box Office Improvements from the Original Film to the Sequel

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Seriously Random Lists | Comments (16)



clerks2-3.jpg

2011 is the year of the sequel. Like most years, it seems. But this year, it really is. There will be 27 sequels released this year, topping the record of 24 sequels set in 2003. And why not? Back in the day (and by the day, I mean: The 90s), I remember hearing something along the lines of, “If the sequel does 70 percent of what the original made, then it’s considered a success.” Now? The sequel needs to make more money than the original, and that’s very often the case. There tends to be a drop-off after the second film, but it’s not atypical now for the second film to improve upon the first film’s box office gross.

And that’s why there are 27 sequels this year.

But historically, which movie franchises fared better their second time out? Here’s a list of the ten movies with the biggest box-office improvement.

The Ten Biggest Box Office Improvements from the Original to the Sequel (Whole Dollar)

1. Batman Begins ($205 million) —> The Dark Knight ($533 million): $328 million

2. Terminator ($38 million) —-> Terminator 2 ($204 million): $166 million

3. Shrek ($267 million) —-> Shrek 2 ($441 million): $174 million

4. Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery ($53 million) —-> Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me ($206 million): $153 million

5. Tron ($33 million) —-> Tron Legacy ($177 million): $144 million

6. Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl ($305 million) —-> Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest ($423 million): $118 million

7. Meet the Parents ($166 million) —-> Meet the Fockers: ($279 million): $113 million

8. The Matrix ($171 million) —-> The Matrix Reloaded: ($281 million): $1`0 million

9. Twilight ($192 million) —-> New Moon ($296 million): $104 million

10. First Blood ($47 million) —-> Rambo: First Blood Part 2 ($150 million): $103 million


The Ten Biggest Box Office Improvements from the Original to the Sequel (By Percentage)

1. The Boondock Saints ($30,000) —-> Boondock Saints: All Saints Day ($10 million): 33,248%

2. Clerks ($3.1 million) —-> Clerks 2 ($24 million): 677%

3. The Hustler ($7.6 million) —-> The Color of Money ($52 million): 588%

4.. Tron ($33 million) —-> Tron Legacy ($177 million): 436%

5. Terminator ($38 million) —-> Terminator 2 ($204 million): 434%

6. . Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery ($53 million) —-> Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me ($206 million): 282%

7. . First Blood ($47 million) —-> Rambo: First Blood Part 2 ($150 million): 219%

8. Mad Max ($8.75 million) —-> Mad Max 2: The Road Warrior ($23 million): 170%

9. Highlander ($5.9 million) —-> Highlander II: The Quickening ($15.5 million): 164%

10. Batman Begins ($205 million) —> The Dark Knight ($533 million): 160%










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



See What You Have Wrought, Cowboys & Aliens? Sonnenfeld Developing Dominion: Dinosaurs Versus Aliens | Trade News that Will Float Like a Poop Monster, Sting Like a Motherf**ker









Comments

Highlander ($5.9 million) —-> Highlander II: The Quickening ($15.5 million): 164%

Thanks for ruining my day, Rowles!

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at May 11, 2011 12:10 PM

I was under the mistaken impression that this was going to be about sequels that were artistically better than the originals, like Empire Strikes Back, or any of the later Harry Potter films.

Posted by: BWeaves at May 11, 2011 12:20 PM

10. The Matrix ($171 million) —-> The Matrix Reloaded: ($281 million): $100 million

The difference is $110 million, which would bump it up to number 8.

/The more you know

Posted by: JP at May 11, 2011 12:24 PM

Some of these numbers, e.g., The Hustler vs The Color of Money badly need to be adjusted for inflation.

Posted by: Drake at May 11, 2011 12:25 PM

this is depressing. that's the second time i said that this week. what's going on?

Posted by: splinter at May 11, 2011 12:26 PM

Any more, sequels are like fast food. People go to them because they know what to expect and they get what you deserve. It's like people who travel to Italy or France and want to know where the nearest MacDonald's is.

Posted by: BWeaves at May 11, 2011 12:31 PM

There will be 27 sequels released this year, topping the record of 24 sequels set in 2003.

It's no coincidence that both now and 2003 are post-economic recession. The studios are more risk-adverse, so they're more likely to produce sequels.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at May 11, 2011 12:32 PM

Drake is right. This whole listicle is meaningless without adjustment for inflation. I feel the need to add, I love you, Pajiba!

Posted by: moppy at May 11, 2011 12:41 PM

Lots of pissed off dollars hangin' out with Boondock Saints II...

Posted by: ShagEaredVillain at May 11, 2011 12:48 PM

Clerks ($3.1 million) —-> Clerks 2 ($24 million): 677%


Yeah Rowles, I’m sure “Clerks” will keep Smith on the short list of most sought after directors.

or


Congratulations Rowles, you’ve finally got Smith a stay of execution. But unfortunately your luck will run out once it reaches a federal court. In the mean time, enjoy.


or

Yeah Rowles, I’m sure Smith is just turning down oodles of work.

Posted by: Pookie at May 11, 2011 1:05 PM

Color of Money is an under appreciated movie.

Posted by: logan at May 11, 2011 1:11 PM

Color of Money is a great movie. It's almost as good as the original.

Posted by: Mrcreosote at May 11, 2011 1:17 PM

Drake is more than right, given the number of years between original and sequel in some of these cases. For example, let's examine The Hustler:

What cost $7,600,000 in 1961 (The Hustler) would cost $27,917,969.23 in 1986 and $54,765,688.76 in 2010.

What cost $52,000,000 in 1986 would cost $102,006,553.28 in 2010.
The margin in 2010 dollars is significantly larger, then, but wouldn't be quite as large in 1986 dollars. FWIW, as it were.

Posted by: Jerry at May 11, 2011 1:21 PM

I had no idea the TRON: Legacy total number was so...low (in modern terms.) Did that movie make a profit?

Posted by: LEROOOY at May 11, 2011 2:15 PM

There's a problem with the list by percentages. Highlander is listed as number nine, but we all know that the Highlander movie had no sequels, just the silly TV show.

Posted by: sistercoyote at May 11, 2011 2:20 PM

How did Little Fockers do?

Posted by: Snuggiepants at May 11, 2011 10:33 PM