web
counter
 

Six "Advanced" Modern American Filmmakers (And One "Advanced" Actor)

By Rob Payne | Posted Under Seriously Random Lists | Comments (30)



pajibaadvancedgeniuslynch.jpg

In those days when it seems like we’ve entered the darkest of all possible timelines, some times it’s nice to just get lost in pointless debates about pop culture. It’s what God invented the Internet for (and if God didn’t create it, man certainly would have had to.) So it seems appropriate that when Twitter demands we #savecommunity, that we should engage in some truly Abedic discourse. Specifically, the arbitrariness of the Advanced Genius Theory.

Critics of “Advancement” say that the very not-scientific theory is bad for culture because it cuts off any further inquiry on a subject — a sufficiently “Advanced” artist cannot progress any further. At least in terms of discourse. As Chuck Klosterman states in his July 2004 Esquire essay that introduced Advacement to the masses, “once something is deemed advanced, all debate is moot.” To paraphrase a Rolling Stone writer from that same article, Advanced Genius Theory may simply be “a way…to appreciate shitty [art] by people [you] consider to be non-shitty.”

So what is this so-called “Advanced Genius Theory” concocted by two 90s college students who really liked Lou Reed? As Klosterman puts it:

What is Advancement?

Advancement is a cultural condition in which an Advanced individual—i.e., a true genius—creates a piece of art that 99 percent of the population perceives to be bad. However, this is not because the work itself is flawed; this is because most consumers are not Advanced.

Now, don’t assume this means that everything terrible is awesome, or vice versa; that contrarianism has no place in Advancement theory. The key to Advancement is that Advanced artists a) do not do what is expected of them but also b) do not do the opposite of what is expected of them. If an artist does the direct opposite of what is anticipated, he is classified as “overt” (more on this later). The bottom line is this: When a genius does something that appears idiotic, it does not necessarily mean he suddenly sucks. What it might mean is that he’s doing something you cannot understand, because he has Advanced beyond you.

So, in terms of contemporary movies (bear with me here)…

Stephen Spielberg is most certainly not “Advanced” under these conditions. He might have been when he originally made Schlinder’s List, but then he followed that with a consistent “one for me, one for them” philosophy (as well as bizarrely ignoring Empire of the Sun). Neither is Martin Scorcese, unless Hugo proves to be the start of a slightly more esoteric career away from gangsters and rock docs. Peter Jackson isn’t, neither are James Cameron nor Christopher Nolan, but Joss Whedon might be once he makes and releases a few more movies. George Lucas, Michael Bay, and Brett Ratner certainly aren’t, because they’re just in it for the money, but Uwe Boll might be if he ever made a movie that anybody considered genuinely great. Kevin Smith? Since he’s only supposedly making one more film after Red State before he retires, and that movie is going to be a hockey comedy, Smith is currently out of the running. David Fincher would be “Advanced” if he had made Alien 3 after Fight Club and Darren Aronofsky would be if he had made The Wolverine, but alas. If J.J. Abrams follows up Star Trek 2 with a period piece that contains no fanboy genre riffs, and then an adaptation of an Agatha Christie novel, and then Star Trek 3, he might “Advance.” If Julie Taymor had successfully brought her version of Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark to Broadway, she certainly would be less a hot mess and more of a genius.

Point being, you can disagree with every bit of that, because this is the Internet and we have Godwin’s Law and the Polanski Corollary here. You can argue that any of those above filmmakers, and more not mentioned (or listed below), are “Advanced Geniuses,” but you have to back it up with evidence. I’ve tried to do that for the six directors, and one actor, listed here, hopefully proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are beyond reproach. Indeed, that these Seven Artists Are Sufficiently Advanced.

And if you do disagree with my selections, or lack thereof, just remember arguing with me only proves your own fall into the pop culture looking glass. I’m not even sure if I’m doing this right, or if there even is a “right” way. That’s how silly it is. That said, enjoy!



The Directors

David Lynch
Moment of Advancement: Dune, 1984

Why Dune? Because Lynch had already made a name for himself as a true auteur, but when taking on his first (and only) Hollywood blockbuster, he maintained that artistic integrity (much to many a Frank Herbert fans’ dismay) to deliver a very Lynchian sci-fi masterpiece. This is a key facet of being a genius, as he could have sold out his own sensibilities to make something much more studio friendly, but satisfied himself and his own impulses first. He may have alienated some audience, but that’s the point, and it isn’t like those were his fans, anyway. The fact that his only other “commercial” work were actual commercials for Sony’s Playstation 3 game console several years ago, in spite of some moderate box office/awards success, simply accentuates Lynch’s “Advancedness.”

Other Notable Advanced Works: Eraserhead, The Elephant Man, Blue Velvet, Lost Highway, Mullholland Dr.


Joel & Ethan Coen
Moment of Advancement: The Big Lebowski, 1998

Why Lebowski? Like David Lynch, by the time this movie came out, the brothers Coen made movies that clearly delivered on their past promise, but this update on Raymond Chandler shocked critics and fans alike when it was first released. It was only appreciated after it achieved cult status on VHS, and has only become a modern classic in recent years. Some might say that the trifecta of Intolerable Cruelty, The Ladykillers, and The Man Who Wasn’t There were the films that propelled the brothers to true “Advancement” as they were (and still are) considered to be their lesser works, but those movies were merely shrugged at and those people forget how skewered Lebowski was when it first plopped in 1998. So many viewers hated it simply because it came immediately after Fargo, and threw them for a loop they didn’t expect or want. Which is exactly what “Advanced Geniuses” do.

Other Notable Advanced Works: Raising Arizona, Fargo, O’ Brother, Where Art Thou?, The Man Who Wasn’t There, Burn After Reading, True Grit


Steven Soderbergh
Moment of Advancement: The Limey, 1999

Why Limey? There’s a theme with many of these choices, and Soderbergh’s excursion into crime films (with Limey sandwiched between Out of Sight and Ocean’s Eleven) is no different. The director was an indie darling who was sniffing at mass market appeal, and then he made The Limey, a movie that barely anybody saw, but that proved he was going to do whatever the damn hell he pleased. Terence Stamp’s line, “You tell ‘em I’m comin’!” may as well have been delivered by Soderbergh himself. He’s proven himself capable of directing any type of movie in any type of genre, and he makes movies with little or no apparent plan in why he makes them when he makes them; shuffling between budgets large and miniscule, between Hollywood’s acting heavyweights and non-thespians like pornstar Sasha Grey, MMA fighter Gina Carano, and Charming Potato . He challenges himself, which challenges his audience, who would just like for him to make Ocean’s Fourteen, okay? But that isn’t how the “Advanced” artist proceeds.

Other Notable Advanced Works: Sex, Lies, and Videotape, Ocean’s Eleven, Solaris, The Girlfriend Experience, Che, The Man From U.N.C.L.E. (upcoming), Everything he’s ever done, really…


George Clooney
Moment of Advancement: Fail Safe, 2000

Why Fail Safe? Before George Clooney became one of the most consistently damn good actor/directors working day, he was a television star who tried to make his first steps into multiplexes by go the big time blockbuster route with Peacemaker and Batman & Robin. To no avail, obviously. After those misfires, Clooney looked inward to discover the artist he would rather be. His first step into that larger world was the TV movie Fail Safe, which was an adaptation of a 60s movie, and remained set, shot, and performed as though it were still a 60s movie — and they did all of this on live television. Twice (for both East and West coast broadcasts). Clooney wasn’t even the star onscreen, but off-screen, as producer, Fail Safe wouldn’t exist without him, thus setting the foundation for his genius.

Other Notable Advanced Works: Confessions of a Dangerous Mind, O’ Brother, Where Art Thou?, Solaris, Good Night, and Good Luck, The Men Who Stare At Goats


Charlie Kaufman
Moment of Advancement: Adaptation, 2002

Why Adaptation? Undoubtedly with the shortest relevant resume in terms of noting his “Advancement,” Kaufman’s brief history as a screenwriter and director is rife with the man doing what he wants, when he wants, and succeeding where no other artist working in his field could possibly succeed. By the time he made Adaptation, he had already written the man-raised-by-wid-animals farce Human Nature, the mind-bending Being John Malkovich, and the first draft of Clooney’s Chuck Barris fictional autobiography Confessions. But by inserting a version of himself into his adaptation of The Orchid Thief — as well as his attempts to adapt that very script, a fictional brother, and the imagined off-the-page lives of the book’s author and protagonist, respectively — proved Charlie Kaufman would always follow his own muse. Whether we liked it or not. (Good thing we did.)

Other Notable Advanced Works: Human Nature, Being John Malkovich, The Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Synecdoche, New York


Terry Gilliam
Moment of Advancement: Tideland, 2007

Why Tideland? Whether you find yourself to be a regular fan of Terry Gilliam’s work or not, one would be hard pressed to never appreciating or admiring a few of his films. As a former member of Monty Python, anyway, he’ll always be beloved. While he’s survived strong critiques in the past, very few of his movies unleashed the ire of both critics and moviegoers quite like Tideland. It is, without question, his hardest movie to watch, most likely because he refuses to flinch as a little girl tries to maintain her innocence in a world seemingly determined to crush her spirit. It doesn’t hurt that Gilliam himself considers Tideland to be his most personal work. Apparent Artistic Failure + Deeply Felt Artistic Expression = The Definition of Advanced Genius Theory.

Other Notable Advanced Works: Jabberwocky, Brazil, The Adventures of Baron Munchausen,The Fisher King, 12 Monkeys, The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus


The Actor

Bill Murray
Moment of Advancement: The Razor’s Edge, 1984

Why The Razor’s Edge? Like Clooney, Bill Murray is mostly known as an actor, and started his career on TV, and his first several films belied his true artistic passions. He capitalized on his inherent sarcastic humor to become a comedy legend, but fairly quickly he began scratching that artier itch by producing and starring in an adaptation of W. Somerset Maugham’s The Razor’s Edge. A period piece about one man’s psychological breakdown and subsequent rebuilding after World War I, this was Murray’s first attempt at something besides comedy. Of course, it failed miserably. But watching it now, the movie is not only a solid piece of work, but Murray is every bit the all-around performer he’s only recently been acknowledged as. After Edge, it would be more than a decade before Bill Murray stretched himself this much again (in Wes Anderson’s Rushmore — himself on the verge of Advancement with The Fantastic Mr. Fox), but after doing so and not being raked over the critical coals, his career would never be the same again. It’s just too bad we didn’t appreciate all that he was trying to do way back in 1984. But now, even if he succombs to Dan Aykroyd’s pleas for Ghostbusters 3, Bill Murray will always be considered a genius.

Other Notable Advanced Works: Quick Change, Scrooged, Hamlet, Rushmore, Coffee and Cigarettes, Broken Flowers

Rob Payne also writes the indie comic The Unstoppable Force and tweets on the Twitter @RobOfWar. He’s pretty sure Abed from “Community” would love to engage in an Advanced Theory debate, and he’s proud to honor that hopefully not-fallen hero, and no he isn’t taking this whole thing too seriously, thanks.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Happy Sunshiny News to Put Some Happy in the New Depths of Despair You Reached Last Night (Also, GIFs) | 5 Shows After 11/15/11









Comments

I thought Al Gore invented the internet.

Posted by: Freller at November 15, 2011 3:09 PM

There is no God, Rob.


(Ha! Touche. 1 Internets for you. -RobP)

Posted by: csb at November 15, 2011 3:15 PM

"When a genius does something that appears idiotic, it does not necessarily mean he suddenly sucks. What it might mean is that he’s doing something you cannot understand, because he has Advanced beyond you."

Like Harold Camping.

Posted by: DenG at November 15, 2011 3:29 PM

So this would be the direct opposite of people who go to a vernissage proclaiming "I know nothing about art but I know what I like when I see it"?

Posted by: cinekat at November 15, 2011 3:37 PM

I wholeheartedly concur with your list.

Posted by: Sara H at November 15, 2011 3:55 PM

Murray, Kauffman, Soderberg, and Gilliam are definitely Advanced - good call. David Lynch is Overt (as is Tim Burton). Had he directed one of Pirates of the Caribbean films, that might be a sign of Advancement, but instead he insists on being David Lynch(tm). Robert Downey Jr. made an Advanced choice starring in Iron Man, as did Pacino with Jack and Jill. While Johnny Depp really wants to be Advanced, Val Kilmer IS.

Posted by: Greedy at November 15, 2011 3:58 PM

So we're not going to count Guillermo del Toro or Gus Van Sant either? And I really think Darren Aronofsky should be included.

As for an advanced actor...I'd have to go with Viggo Mortensen.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at November 15, 2011 4:09 PM

Put that tarring brush away, I went and saw "The Big Lebowski" twice.

Posted by: Jay at November 15, 2011 4:38 PM

With this criteria I would say Robin Williams also can be considered Advanced. From coke fueled stand-up to Mork to The World According to Garp. And no one saw his performance in Insomnia and One Hour Photo coming. Now he shuffles between dark indies like "Father of the Year" and for-the-masses movies generic comedies like...whatever the hell that thing was he did with John Travolta and Seth Green at a zoo. I have no idea what it is called and I really don't want to go look it up.

Posted by: TylerDFC at November 15, 2011 4:46 PM

@Greedy, I think Lynch is just like Helena Bonham Carter: really fucking crazy. I don't know if he's advanced. But you cannot tell me that's just a schtick. He's too consistent for that.

Posted by: FabMax at November 15, 2011 4:47 PM

@FabMax - I don't think it's schtick, dude probably is really warped. But since he is crazy, that explains much of what might be incomprehensible about his work - rather than being Advanced beyond our understanding. And consistency is incompatible with Advancement.

Posted by: Greedy at November 15, 2011 5:09 PM

Lynch is on his own planet. Strike that - Lynch is his own planet.

As for Soderbergh, I would posit that a small independent movie with a stellar cast is overt, not advanced. The Advanced move was Bubble. I don't think anyone expected that.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at November 15, 2011 5:30 PM

Maybe I'm alone in this...but I don't see anything crazy about Dune. I saw it as a teenager I think, and then I read the book, and then I thought that Lynch pretty much exactly covered the book. What exactly makes this movie so far out there? Some voiceover? some glowy eyes?

Posted by: Sara Tonin at November 15, 2011 7:38 PM

@Three-nineteen: I agree that Bubble was unexpected, but only without the context of Schizopolis, Gray's Anatomy, and Kafka before it. I still almost went with it, though. It was a tough call.

@TylerDFC: Robin Williams might very well be Advanced. He might also just make bad career decisions. I'm honestly not sure. T.J. Miller, though, will almost certainly qualify in a few years.

Posted by: RobP at November 15, 2011 10:21 PM

I don't know. It just seems like "Advanced" means you gain some commercial/critical success and then instead of sticking to what made you successful, you try something different, and managed to do it ok to well.

The only one I'd place into the spirit of what I think they were trying for with "Advancement" is Kaufman. Because it seems like his brain has always been way way out there, but always manages to pull back into something people can take a message from.

Posted by: e at November 16, 2011 12:03 AM

I liked Peacemaker...

The Big Lebowski is the only Cohen brothers movie I didn't see in the theater, simply because everyone was saying how bad it was. When I first saw it on VHS I was pissed! I think that was the day I truly stopped listening to what anyone said about anything creative. That betrayal opened my mind, man.

For Soderbergh, the first time I saw Sex, Lies and videotape, it kinda floored me a little. I wasn't expecting what came out there, especially from Andie McDowell. I'd always loved her (I think because she reminds me of my mom. Thanks Freud) but had accepted that she wasn't very talented as an actress. Hell, she only got the role in Greystoke because she was so gorgeous. I'm not saying the role changed that opinion, but it was a role she 'fit' in pretty well, I thought, and the ending just sealed it for me.

That said, The Limey is one of my favorite movies and I have to admit that I didn't even realize Soderbergh directed it.

Though I love Gilliam, mostly for The Fisher King, The Adventures of Baron Von Munchhausen and Time Bandits, he often reminds me of my nemesis, Tim Burton. He spends too much time making ridiculous set pieces and campy little scenes and then is so proud of what he's done, he spends too much of the film's energy focusing on them. I think part of his problem is being in the British system too long. The same reason I found it hard to get into old Dr Who episodes: the lack of budget is way too apparent in the production.

Lynch, I just cannot take. I love Dune, even after having read all the novels Herbert wrote, but even then it's impossible to ignore the fact that it's just a weird, goofy film in places, what with all the mind-reading narration and strange art direction. I think part of why it works is precisely because it is so bizarre. This is supposed to be our descendants, but so far into the future that we don't even remember the planet we came from, so far off that we **SPOILER** don't even remember that Ix is called that because it was our ninth planet - IX **not much of a spoiler and no longer a planet**. The sets and odd behavior only highlight how alien everything was, despite it still being "us". Some of the truly Lynchian, messed up stuff, like Baron Harkonnen's horrible acne, was added by Lynch just to "up the weirdness level".
Lost Highway on the other hand. Feh. No one but Lynch would let Cage do his idiotic Elvis impersonation through an entire film. That's not Advanced, that's like waterboarding my soul.

Bill Murray is kinda the only one who really belongs here.

Posted by: Protoguy at November 16, 2011 3:39 AM

Also, I have to agree with DeistBrawler, Viggo and Aronofsky fit here pretty well.

Posted by: Protoguy at November 16, 2011 3:57 AM

This whole gawddamn article is like a reheated argument for why the work of Transcendental Mediators is, like, too smart for you normal stupid people. The only thinga missing are the appeals for shutting off all your EM fields and making sure you buy your balancing herbs.

(Written from my id cave here in the heart of Fairfield, Iowa, a mere half mile away from Maharishi University & David Lynch's townhouse.)

Posted by: idiosynchronic at November 16, 2011 8:50 AM

I got Lynch in the rearview as I am consistently unimpressed with his everything, though I have tried.
I will never eclipse Bill Murray.

Posted by: Agogagogo at November 16, 2011 8:53 AM

i do like lynch. any thoughts on the straight story?

Posted by: splinter at November 16, 2011 9:05 AM

Sorry, we're busy taking the piss out of a really fucking stupid self justifying bullshit idea right?

Because 'advanced' is another word for "I love it and you scum just don't get it. You're not advanced enough"

It's another elitist bullshit theory and it deserves no time at all.

Posted by: Ender at November 16, 2011 9:07 AM

Because 'advanced' is another word for "I love it and you scum just don't get it. You're not advanced enough"

That is a misinterpretation of the theory. The artist is Advanced, not the audience. Recognizing the Advancement of an artist does not confer upon the critic/viewer/listener any status whatsoever. Elitism has nothing to do with it. It is a theory that attempts to reconcile work created by an artistic genius that may not be an immediate and apparent reflection of that genius. Perhaps Advancement Theory is better applied to artists working in a medium that is less collaborative (and less money-driven) than that of mainstream film, but it is worthy of exploration and discussion. Thanks RobP.

Posted by: Greedy at November 16, 2011 10:29 AM


i have been of the opinion that many comedians are far better
actors than they are comedians ... robin williams in " dead poets
society " and " good will hunting " is a prime example . another is
eddie murphy in " dreamgirls ".
but bill murray??? he isn't funny and is a disaster as an actor ...
he gets props for " lost in translation " but that movie proved
3 things besides murray's ineptitude. the awarding of the oscar
proved the incestuos nature of hollywood, scarjo can't act and
there really is a cure for insomnia.

Posted by: snake at November 16, 2011 10:43 AM

I second splinter's comment up there. No mention of Lynch's The Straight Story -- his G-rated, Disney Pictures released, completely normal movie? Even haters gotta admit that's grounds for Advancement.

Posted by: CW at November 16, 2011 2:08 PM

Lynch hated Dune and refused to have his name on it, changing it to "An Alan Smithee Film" so I don't think we can argue it as his reason for becoming advanced, since it's not like he did it out of any sort of spur to change his style, nor does it reflect what he wanted for the film.

The Straight Story, however, is a perfect example of why he is considered advanced, and is a deliberate artistic choice to go in a different direction.

Posted by: ninetwenteetoo at November 16, 2011 2:32 PM

"The artist is Advanced, not the audience. Recognizing the Advancement of an artist does not confer upon the critic/viewer/listener any status whatsoever."

Except the status of understanding and recognising 'advanced' works - presumably because you too are advanced, or your understanding of film is 'advanced'.

"Elitism has nothing to do with it."

Except for the name "Advanced" implying an advanced elite.

And the concept - a small cadre of 'advanced' filmakers who create elite works that are impenetrable to the non-'advanced' masses. Not because they are poorly framed and communicated, or even because different audiences have difference vocabularies or different languages of film - theirs being one small one of many - but because their films are better, too advanced for the non-elite audiences.

"Perhaps Advancement Theory is better applied to artists working in a medium that is less collaborative"

Perhaps Advancement Theory would be better off proposing strict criteria and recognisable real limits/predictions so that we can distinguish it from simple confirmation bias and wishful thinking.

If there are no objective criteria then there is no way to distinguish between filmakers who are described by the theory and filmakers that people just appreciate. If you classify one film in an opus as 'advanced', then come back a few years later and realise that it was not as clever as you thought it was there is no way to distinguish between that situation and a simple change of tastes.
The theory without criteria is nothing more than an excuse for people to view their subjective opinions as theory driven judgements.

Posted by: Ender at November 17, 2011 7:53 AM

Perhaps Advancement Theory would be better off proposing strict criteria and recognisable real limits/predictions so that we can distinguish it from simple confirmation bias and wishful thinking.

It does have criteria (keeping in mind AT was originally created to apply to music, and specifically rock 'n' roll): "The Advanced artist must (at some point in his career) wear a black leather jacket with black sunglasses, he must have a mullet, and he must appear on the cover of his own solo albums." Also, "if something is done ironically, it cannot be Advanced."


If there are no objective criteria then there is no way to distinguish between filmakers who are described by the theory and filmakers that people just appreciate.

The theory without criteria is nothing more than an excuse for people to view their subjective opinions as theory driven judgements.

Is there any objective criteria used in art criticism or appreciation? With all due respect to the fine reviewers here, art criticism boils down to "I like/didn't like X based on my subjective opinions." The better critics possess an informed frame of reference on which they are basing their opinions, but they are still in the end putting forth subjective judgements.

I will walk back a little and agree that AT is an elitist approach, but not an exclusive one (at least as far as your normal individual being able to recognize Advancement - as the Advanced Artist is incredibly rare, they are of course, exclusive and elite). Or, rather, because the nuances of Advancement are impenetrable to the vast majority of people (including me), everyone is equally excluded.

Advancement Theory should be correctly called Advancement Hypothesis, if Advancement Hypothesis didn't sound so clunky. It is a work in progress, and further observation and data collection are required to flesh it out. But so far, as an explanation for Robert Altman and "Popeye," Advancement Theory fits pretty well.

Posted by: Greedy at November 17, 2011 1:49 PM

SWINTON should be on this list. Her moment of advancement? Narnia.

Posted by: Arrogant Ambassador at November 19, 2011 4:48 PM

God! I just saw Dr. Parnassus yesterday...better said, I finished it yesterday because it took me weeks to go through that crap-fest of audiovisual mediocrity and shitty writing.

Posted by: James at November 21, 2011 7:33 PM

Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any other.

Posted by: Salina Servedio at January 3, 2012 3:26 AM