web
counter
 

Ranking, Without Comment, the Last 53 Romantic Comedies Released in North America

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Seriously Random Lists | Comments (74)



500DaysOfSummerStorePic.jpg

I don’t know what the actual percentage of studio releases I see each year is, but it’s probably somewhere between 80 and 90 percent of all wide releases. I see a lot of films, and most of them are bad. Honestly, really bad. Many of them I see to review, but there are several categories of films that I see almost regardless of whether they’re good or not. That’s typically any movie expected to make more than $50 million (because I like to have an informed opinion on popular films), almost all horror films (because, believe it or not, it’s one of my favorite genres, even if 90 percent of them are complete rubbish) and every romantic comedy. That’s in part because I typically assign most of the romantic comedy reviews to myself, and it’s also because nothing beats a great romance. Unfortunately, over the last five years, I could count the great romances on one hand, after I’ve cut off two fingers (and only one of them was a romantic comedy). They are a true rarity these days.

How rare? I decided to look back at the last four years of romantic-comedy releases and rank them because, why not? I’ve seen them all, and by lining them all up together on one page, the rest of you can get an idea of just how horrible the genre is. Worse than you’re already low assessment. Most of our readers probably only remember less than half of these, despite the fact that I only chose movies released within the last four years that made at least $5 million. Most of them, however, fall in between the $30 and $75 million range. Most are also instantly forgettable, except for the brain damage, which is permanent.

In selecting the films, I chose only the comedies where a romance was central to the story. In most cases, these movies could be classified as “chick flicks” but I know better than to use that term on this site. But they were targeted by the studios largely at female audiences and date-night engagements. I’ve excluded “bromances” like Role Models and I Love You, Man, as well as straight comedies where the romance is incidental, like Extract.

About the rankings, I would only consider one a “great” romantic comedy. I would consider the next fourgood romantic comedies that I’d watch again (in fact, I have). Everything below number 10 is a bad movie; they’re just varying degrees of bad. Forty-three of the 53 movies on this list received pans by our site, most of them by myself. Everything below number 15, I not only disliked: I hated.

Many of you may take issue, not with the rankings, but with any movie above number ten even qualifying as decent. That’s OK. But when you watch 20 of these a year, any romantic comedy with a half a moment of authenticity stands out. You hated The Proposal? Then look at the bottom ten on this list, and maybe you’ll understand why The Proposal is at number nine or why a movie as mediocre as Four Christmases is at 18. It’s because it didn’t make me want to cause serious harm to myself, only minor.

This, folks, is why so many people despise the romantic comedy genre:

1. (500) Days of Summer
2. Easy A
3. Forgetting Sarah Marshall
4. Morning Glory
5. Going the Distance
6. Definitely, Maybe
7. Zack and Miri Make a Porno
8. Sex Drive
9. Date Night
10. The Proposal

11. Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist
12. Leatherheads
13. The Invention of Lying
14. It’s Complicated
15. Take Me Home Tonight
16. Just Wright
17. Mamma Mia
18. Four Christmases
19. The Switch
20. No Strings Attached
21. Love and Other Drugs
22. How Do You Know
23. Arthur
24. Hall Pass
25. The House Bunny
26. She’s Out of My League
27. What Happens in Vegas
28. I Love You, Beth Cooper
29. Sex and the City
30. He’s Just Not That Into You
31. Made of Honor
32. You Again
33. New In Town
34. Love Happens
35. Valentine’s Day
36. The Dilemma
37. Couples Retreat
38. Fool’s Gold
39. The Ugly Truth
40. When in Rome
41. You Don’t Mess with the Zohan
42. Sex and the City 2
43. 27 Dresses
44. Confessions of a Shopaholic
45. The Bounty Hunter
46. The Back-Up Plan
47. Just Go With It
48. Paul Blart: Mall Cop
49. All About Steve
50. Bride Wars
51. Ghosts of Girlfriends Past
52. The Love Guru
53. Leap Year









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Terri Trailer: Why Do Movies About Overweight People Go for the Easy Fat Jokes? Because the Alternative Is Too Painful | Listen, Gaga, I Love You, But When You Claim To Be An Original, You Just Sound, Well, Dumb









Comments

Waitress?

Posted by: sillytwoshoes at April 20, 2011 12:10 PM

Having never seen Leap Year, I cannot possibly protest its placement. I have, however, seen both The Ugly Truth AND 27 Dresses, and I cannot believe they placed as high as they did.

Posted by: bonnie at April 20, 2011 12:12 PM

Waitress isn't really a comedy, I don't think. It's bittersweet, but not really going for laughs.

Posted by: Damnyankees at April 20, 2011 12:15 PM

I love Definitely, Maybe more than most things. And Forgetting Sarah Marshall would be in my top three.

Posted by: Julie at April 20, 2011 12:15 PM

Date Night is an abomination and easily one of the worst movies on this list. Also, Zohan is way too high. It should be joint bottom with The Love Guru.

Posted by: supafly at April 20, 2011 12:21 PM

The wife FORBID me to watch Couples Retreat, so your ranking seems just.

Leap Year is on HBO 3 times a day, just beckoning me to watch. Oh yeah, HBO? Well some dude on the internet just told me it was worse than The Love Guru. THE LOVE GURU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You're lucky Game of Thrones is excellent or I'd poop in your gears, Home Box Office.

Posted by: Kballs at April 20, 2011 12:21 PM

This should be the next Cannonball Run. All participants must sign a "no-stab" clause.

Posted by: D-Day at April 20, 2011 12:22 PM

Scott Pilgrim v. the World?

Posted by: Summer at April 20, 2011 12:24 PM

Since I've only seen 8 of these and three of them were on a plane without audio, I'm not really qualified to comment but I would have moved "Definitely, Maybe" to number 2 based on the fact that at the characters were least likable and they had realistic jobs and apartments.

Posted by: PaddyDog at April 20, 2011 12:25 PM

Oops. That should be "the characters were AT least likable".

Posted by: PaddyDog at April 20, 2011 12:26 PM


lists are always fuel for controversy and that provides
the lifeblood for this site. a list of 52 of anything is a bit like
making a fantasy baseball draft selection in the 25th round.

i see all romantic comedies no matter how bad they are and
sometimes get surprised with a " sex drive " or " she's out of
my league". for the most part i agreed with the flow of the
list with one major exception. i really liked " leap year " amy
adams, mathew goode and the irish countryside sold me. if
forced to offer a replacement for the #52 slot ( anything to do
with a deck of cards ?), i would nominate " all about steve ", a
truly noxious film.

Posted by: snake at April 20, 2011 12:27 PM

I'm happy to see Zack and Miri in at #6. It is the only movie on this list I've actually seen, and I really liked it. Maybe I'll give the top 5 a try some time, just to see if I like them as well.

Posted by: CptCrckpot at April 20, 2011 12:31 PM

I second the inclusion of Forgetting Sarah Marshall into that Top 9 (Top 10 now?). Beyond that, that's just depressing.

I thought horror movies and action movies were cookie-cutter. They got nothing on this!

Posted by: Fredo at April 20, 2011 12:32 PM

I dislike "Leap Year" but "When In Rome" was WAY WAY WAY WAY worse.

Maybe I'm just pissed at Kristen Bell.

Posted by: KC at April 20, 2011 12:33 PM

Holy S***! How bad was Leap Year that it is ranked below Love Guru??!!

Posted by: John W at April 20, 2011 12:34 PM

Dustin needs to work on his Dracula Musical!

Forgetting Sarah Marshalllllll!!!!!!!!

(screams like Charlton Heston in that rousing RomCom of yesteryear: Soylent Green)....

Posted by: klingonfree at April 20, 2011 12:36 PM

I still don't get the Easy A love. I found it to be grating and annoying to the point that I couldn't even get the whole way through. The part that I did happen to make it through was mostly spent yelling at the stupid dialog and making dismissive laughter pufts according to every letter in the alphabet.
I think it was just a perfect storm of all things hated most by moi: teenagers and romcoms. But mostly just teenagers. I just...fucking hate anything to do with teenagers.
Oh well.

Posted by: beet salad at April 20, 2011 12:37 PM

I can't believe He's Just Not That Into You made it that high. That movie offended me on so many levels. When Jennifer Aniston is the sanest character in a film, there's something wrong. Plus that film put a blight on the wonderful Justin Long. It's going to be a while before I can fully forgive him for that shit.

And She's Out of My League? The only reason I sat through that film is because I think Jay Baruchel is absolutely adorable. Otherwise, that movie was barely tolerable. I can't remember the last time I laughed so little in a so-called comedy.

Posted by: Kaleena at April 20, 2011 12:38 PM

Yeah, When in Rome was just like getting raped by your own erect turds. None of it makes any sense and just when you think it can't get any worse, here comes another turd!

Posted by: Kballs at April 20, 2011 12:39 PM

@JohnW, the answer to that question is "heinously bad."

And we all know what heinous rhymes with.....

Posted by: klingonfree at April 20, 2011 12:39 PM

"Paul Blart" was a rom-com? Never plan to see it but I didn't know that.

I can't believe you can still write coherent sentences with all of those horrible cinematic memories bouncing about in your head. "Leap Year" is the one with Amy Adams, right? It's really that bad. And how is "Arthur" a movie you said was an anti-comedy better than most others on that list?

The only one I possibly take issue with is "Fools's Gold". Also one of the few I've actually seen. I thought it would be Romancing the Stone Lite and I wasn't disappointed. Fun movie filled with pretty people in swim suits and perfect for the winter doldrums. Also, "Waitress" and "Forgetting Sarah Marshall" need to be near the top.

Posted by: TylerDFC at April 20, 2011 12:40 PM

Oh! What about Cyrus? That was kinda a romcom, no? Perhaps a romdramedy? A Dramantic comedy? Rommacommadingdong?

Posted by: beet salad at April 20, 2011 12:41 PM

NOTE: Referring to Leap Year the sentence, "It's really that bad.", was meant to be a question.

Posted by: TylerDFC at April 20, 2011 12:42 PM

I hated 500 Days of Summer so much it makes me feel dirty. The hatred is overwhelming. So, no, Dustin. NO.

Also, I will watch just about every romcom I can, but I couldn't get through more than half an hour of The Awful Truth. And that was on three separate ocassions. It just made me nauseous.

And I wouldn't consider Easy A a romcom at all. If anything it was teenage comedy. I don't even remember any romances at all in that.

Posted by: Figgy at April 20, 2011 12:42 PM

This just makes me want to get Mexican take out and watch a rom-com that doesn't suck. It's the perfect day for it. The movie doesn't even necessarily have to be good; I just don't want to feel like I've wasted my time after/while seeing it.

In any case, I haven't seen some in your top nine, so I should probably check them out. Also? I think I've been spared some (many?) of the others on this list, thanks to the terrible reviews they've gotten on this site. As I've mentioned a few times, I'm a sucker for a rom-com, so it helps to have a voice of reason to steer me away from truly crappy ones.

Posted by: tamatha at April 20, 2011 12:44 PM

There is no way possible Leap Year could be worse than The Love Guru. Amy Adams could literally stand in front of a green screen (not a screen used for special effects -- just a screen that is green) for four and a half hours, only pausing occasionally from doing nothing to blow booger missles from her nose, and it would still be a better movie than Love Guru. Mike Myers should be have a steel pendulum with a razor sharp blade at the end strapped to his genitals, and be forced to watch as his loved ones are slowly fileted beneath him for making that movie. He is to Hollywood what Voldemort is to Hogwarts. But less funny.

Posted by: superasente at April 20, 2011 12:44 PM

Agree on the inclusion of Forgetting Sarah Marshal. Other than that I can only comment that I have seen the top ten only. (And Mamma Mia with my Mom.) This list is depressing.
So this comment added nothing to the discussion. But, I have to do that sometimes. Just to remind you all I am still here.

Posted by: Nimue at April 20, 2011 12:45 PM

Yeah, I think I would put "Definitely, Maybe" at the top of this list.
Actually, I think those five are my top five, just in the wrong order.

Definitely, Maybe
Going the Distance
Easy A
Morning Glory
(500) Days of Summer

Posted by: DominaNefret at April 20, 2011 12:47 PM

I'm glad Nick and Norah got ranked so high. Cute little hipster fantasy land.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at April 20, 2011 12:50 PM

tamatha, get some nachos and rent Roman Holiday. Done and done.

Posted by: Fredo at April 20, 2011 12:54 PM

I would sit through a mini-marathon of Sex and the City and Sex and the City 2 a million bajillion times before I would watch Mamma Mia one more time. And I love Colin Firth above all others.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at April 20, 2011 12:54 PM

I was so looking forward to Figgy's 500 Days of Summer vitriol and I'm a litle disappointed. 20 words and no cursing. Lame. I think she should try again and remember to breath from the diaphragm.

Let me help:

I ♥ 500 Days of Summer and I applaud Dustin's ranking of it at number 1. I found it to be original, funny and endearing.

I thought the movie straddled the line of quirk and sincere beautifully.

I hope to see more work from the writers and director.

I think maybe you just didn't get it.

GO!

That should do it. An English teacher used that last one on me in grade 11 in response to my hatred for Catcher in the Rye and I almost went across the desk at him.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at April 20, 2011 12:56 PM

Mrs Julien: You're just so wrong.

BAM! ROASTED!

Posted by: Figgy at April 20, 2011 12:58 PM

(I'm recovering from a heinous day at work yesterday so I'm not feelin' it. I have accepted that Dustin and I will NEVER agree when it comes to most romcoms. I still hate that fucking movie.)

Posted by: Figgy at April 20, 2011 1:00 PM

Disappointing again.

I guess I'll have to provoke Kballs.

On second thought, I don't think I can handle Kballs. I'll provoke Superasente. Hmm. He's too quick.

I'ma go with PaddyDog:

I loved Matthew Macfadyen's Mr. Darcy.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at April 20, 2011 1:05 PM

Me too! I wanna watch that again.

Posted by: Figgy at April 20, 2011 1:07 PM

I'm wearing my "Team Figgy" shirt today because that movie was capital M mediocre. I won't say it was horrible, because I've seen horrible movies. It was well shot, decently acted, their costumes fit et-cetera. But the buildup to utter Blah was the dumps, man. There was not one point that I actively gave a flying squirrelfuck about any of their problems, and in fact most of the time hated the two leads. JGLs character was a cretinous fool. Katy Deschanel Zoey Perry's character was dead inside. BLAH.
BLAH.
For Mrs. J: fuckety fuck whiz

Posted by: Ian at April 20, 2011 1:11 PM

Team Figgy! FUCK YEAH!

Posted by: Figgy at April 20, 2011 1:17 PM

I never really thought of Morning Glory as just a typical rom-com since the major storyline delt with her trying to get the show higher ratings, not necessarily with her romance with Patrick Watson's character. The romance wasn't "central to story" as you said. It was just part of it, with her main one being with Harrison Ford's character. Luckily no romance there.

Posted by: Lynn at April 20, 2011 1:19 PM

Once again my Freudian reading skills come into play.
I misread the header as "the 52 Least Romantic Comedies".

Posted by: Odnon. at April 20, 2011 1:34 PM

Mrs Julien: While I would love to eviscerate the McFadyne (sp) version of Darcy...and I could, don't get me wrong, I could...O yes indeed, I just cannot find my glasses at present so I am typing at a disadvantage. So I'd like to instead assert that Mr. McF's talents were SO very much better used in The Way We Live Now as Felix the Wastrel. I wonder if you agree.

I'm not easily tempted into fisticuffs. But you really seem to have a knack for getting someone to put on the gloves...

Posted by: klingonfree at April 20, 2011 1:39 PM

Knocked Up? and I second Scott Pilgrim. Forgetting Sarah Marshall, not so much in the top ten, but.....I can't see how it didn't make the list.

Posted by: lawyergirl06 at April 20, 2011 1:43 PM

Holy crap. I've only seen two of these. And I think that's a good thing. Sex Drive certainly offered some stupid laughs, but it wasn't even close to what I would call a "good" movie. That it appears so high on this list is frightening.

Posted by: lubeg at April 20, 2011 1:46 PM

I thought he did an excellent impression of George Sanders in The Way We Live Now. Mostly though, I was busy pausing and sighing over the 1870s costumes.

I did not like some things about the 2005 movie (the Bennet's house looking smeared in offal for one), but overall I liked what they did and Macfadyen in particular. He's not Colin Firth or the Mr. Darcy I imagined, but I thought he did a good job, smoldered well, and I would pay him to whisper poetry, preferably a sonnet, in my ear.

But all of this is off topic, so let me bring things back around with Definately, Maybe? Seriously? Definately NOT!

And it always bears repeating that The Proposal sucked (so much so that I'm not even going to bother with HTML tags for it).

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at April 20, 2011 1:49 PM

I don't know about The Love Guru, since I refuse to watch it, but I can attest that my fondness for Amy Adams did not allow me to get more than 15 minutes into Leap Year before I turned it off. Within the first 60 seconds, I hated her smug, privileged character, her fiancee, her whole life and what it stood for, her clothing and shoes, and her job. And I say this as someone who watched the entirety of P.S., I Love You.

Posted by: Reba at April 20, 2011 2:21 PM

500 days of summer. I liked it only because Zooey and Jordan were in it. otherwise, it was pissant. I still want to hear a director say, "Ok, we're doing 500 days of some chick with a fall name, a winter name and a spring name."

Posted by: Lord-ninja at April 20, 2011 2:34 PM

I don't know if it fits perfectly in the genre, but I thought I Love You Phillip Morris was both hilariously funny and utterly, heart-sqeezingly romantic.

Posted by: Skyler Durden at April 20, 2011 2:43 PM

(500) Days of Summer was great. Our generation's Annie Hall.
Haters gonna hate.

Posted by: Yossarian at April 20, 2011 2:43 PM

500 Days made me HATE Zooey Deschanel. And I hate that it made me do that. That movie's like my new archenemy. Next to Jay, of course.

Posted by: Figgy at April 20, 2011 2:58 PM

Apologies everyone. I have no idea how I missed Forgetting Sarah Marshall That was an unfortunate and embarrassing oversight. It's been added to its proper position, and the rankings have been adjusted accordingly.

And Waitress might top this list, but it came out in 2007. The movies above only reflect those released from 2008-2011.

Also, suck it Figgy.

Posted by: Dustin Rowles at April 20, 2011 2:58 PM

1, 2, 16. that's what i've seen. i did enjoy the first two and that last one i went to see because of a friend. i guess i didn't do so badly.

this kind of a list is sad, isn't it? so many movies; so much money; so much crap; = sad.

Posted by: splinter at April 20, 2011 3:01 PM

I fart in your general direction.

Posted by: Figgy at April 20, 2011 3:02 PM

Mrs. Julien:

There are so many things wrong with McFadyen's Darcy that we would need to open a new thread but let just give you the basics:

His lack of hauteur: If there's one thing Darcy absolutely needs it's hauteur. Yet McF played him like an awkward school boy.

His posture: Fitzwilliam Darcy does not stoop. Nor does he walk around a room as if his lower vertebrae were fused together. He has perfectly practiced posture.

His tendency to stand staring at Elizabeth Bennett with his mouth open: AARGH!

And above all, his terribly weak chin: I know McF can't do anything about this, but when you cast one of the most famous romantic heroes whose appearance and demeanor has been described in great detail in the source material, it's best not to cast someone who appears to be missing a mandible; who despite not being overweight has wobbly jowls that wobble even more intensely when he's doing an emotional scene; who is about twice as tall as his leading lady resulting in the most unfortunate squishing of said wobbly jowls whenever he looks down at her.

Need I go on?

Posted by: PaddyDog at April 20, 2011 3:07 PM

That was delicious!

YAY!

I get the objections, but the guy makes me swoony.

I will give you the jawline issue. I think Macfadyen runs to weight and the costumes did him no favours.

But hey, at least it wasn't The Love Guru!

(See Dustin, I am trying to stay on topic)

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at April 20, 2011 3:17 PM

Note: I have nothing against McFadyen. He is a good actor and has for the most part picked good roles. He was excellent in Any Human Heart and so good in Frost/Nixon that I didn't even realize it was he until half way through the film.

But Senator Julien, he is no Fitzwilliam Darcy.

Posted by: PaddyDog at April 20, 2011 3:22 PM

How about Enchanted? I'm not sure if it fits the genre conventions, but it's a lot better film than most on the list.

Posted by: banzai_kitty at April 20, 2011 3:24 PM

/Tips hat

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at April 20, 2011 3:33 PM

I've seen 5 of them, all from the top ten. 4 of those i enjoyed quite a bit.

500 Days of Summer made me ragey and violent and i ridiculously resentful of giving it an hour and a half of my life. disgusting petulant characters, one spineless the other heartless. neither of them the slightest bit interesting. who then do this thing for 90 minutes, i don't even know what to call the thing--call it 500 days, i guess.

absolutely repuslive, i rather sit through the trite-iest mushy formula romance than another film like that.

there's a reason i normally stay away from the romcoms.

oh, and if horror is actually one of Rowles favorite genres, he should maybe stick to reviewing the romcoms. they're a good fit.

Posted by: idleprimate at April 20, 2011 4:42 PM

Can we include indie movies? Everyone needs to stop whatever they are doing and watch TiMER right now. It would be rom-com #2 for me and I know you've all already seen 500 days.

Posted by: Cabbage at April 20, 2011 5:16 PM

How does Scott Pilgrim not qualify?

Sarah Marshall, though funny at parts, was a hard movie for me to watch, because I felt like I'd been in that relationship (and I was the Sarah Marshall.) It was really difficult to watch a whole movie talking about what an awful bitch she was when meanwhile I didn't really see much evidence that Jason Segel's character was actually very sympathetic. Especially by the time we got to Sarah's speech about how hard she really did try, but all he wanted to do was lay around his apartment, I just wanted to cry for her (and for myself.)

Overshare over!

Posted by: Amanda6 at April 20, 2011 5:41 PM

(I never cheated though)

Posted by: Amanda6 at April 20, 2011 5:45 PM

Since we're wondering why Scott Pilgrim didn't qualify, how about the other Cera vehicle "Youth In Revolt," while we're at it?

Posted by: Matches at April 20, 2011 6:02 PM

I guess Scott Pilgrim has too much action to be considered a rom-com.

While the Romantic Comedy genre certainly sucks right now, romance in general is doing just fine. This past decade we've had (500) Days of Summer, Blue Valentine, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Punch-Drunk Love, Atonement, and Wall-E.

Posted by: Vick at April 20, 2011 6:49 PM

I agree with Lynn that Morning Glory is a comedy with an incidental romance. I really enjoyed that one because the love story was incidental.

Posted by: Arrogant Ambassador at April 20, 2011 7:56 PM

Categorizing movies is a foolish endeavor in general.

[spins wheels / get's nowhere]

Posted by: superasente at April 20, 2011 8:33 PM

I never thought I'd say this, but TEAM FIGGY!

Posted by: Uda at April 20, 2011 10:51 PM

I can take most of these, Dustin, partly because I haven't seen a lot of them, but your #1 is just wrong. I don't care how much better it is than other RomCom, but 500 Days of Summer should not be anywhere near an "acceptable" category. It's on the list, ok. It certainly isn't worse than a lot of those, but it should not be in the top ten, let alone the number ONE spot. I would move Zach and Miri to the number one spot. That movie is seriously under-appreciated. Just for starters, name me one movie in the rest of your list where the lead characters are poor, and the idea of money is even brought up? In almost all rom-com, the characters never have to think about money, and they always live in impossibly wonderful houses or lofts.

For example, I recently just sat through the unbearable #21, Love And other Drugs, where the female lead is suffering from Parkinsons disease, has no insurance, and works a couple nights a week at a cafe, and yet lives in a huge art-loft and never seems to be hurting for money. I give huge credit to Kevin Smith for making his characters actually live in the real world, where money actually plays a part in your life.

Posted by: John G. at April 20, 2011 11:02 PM

I thought 500 Days was just okay. The characters were too boring for me to love it. He was wimpy, she was heartless. The both came across as too immature to really know what they were doing. I just couldn't get into it like that.

I do love the scene when JGL dances to Hall and Oats. That was pretty fantastic.

Posted by: kayla at April 20, 2011 11:07 PM

I checked and checked and re-checked. I even ran the find function on my browser and I couldn't find Killers. It has Rainbow Killer in it so by definition it is a) a rom-com and b) terrible. Oversight?

While I liked Nick and Nora (mostly because of Kat Dennings) I can never shake the feeling that it is a loose hipster remake of Adventures in Babysitting

Posted by: ed newman at April 20, 2011 11:58 PM

Where's Adventureland? It's pretty much a rom-com and it was definitely good.

Posted by: dustygator at April 21, 2011 12:42 AM

What about "Tangled" and "The Princess and the Frog"? They were both glorious and fun. Don't be so animationist, Dustin.

Have the 50 best romcoms been done? Number 1 on my list: "His Girl Friday", followed closely by "The Princess Bride", "Woman of the Year", "Broadcast News", "Some Like It Hot", "It Happened One Night", "City Lights", "Harold and Maude", "The Apartment", "Bull Durham"... God, they knew how to do romance in them there olden days, when dames were dames and not rainbow killers.

Loved MacFadyen in "Spooks", but really, folks, there should be a ban on a remake once a role is owned as comprehensively as Firth owns Darcy.

Posted by: Xiufetish at April 21, 2011 7:45 AM

What about "Tangled" and "The Princess and the Frog"? They were both glorious and fun. Don't be so animationist, Dustin.

Have the 50 best romcoms been done? Number 1 on my list: "His Girl Friday", followed closely by "The Princess Bride", "Woman of the Year", "Broadcast News", "Some Like It Hot", "It Happened One Night", "City Lights", "Harold and Maude", "The Apartment", "Bull Durham"... God, they knew how to do romance in them there olden days, when dames were dames and not rainbow killers.

Loved MacFadyen in "Spooks", but really, folks, there should be a ban on a remake once a role is owned as comprehensively as Firth owns Darcy.

Posted by: Xiufetish at April 21, 2011 7:49 AM

So late. Also just saw Two of these while drinking.
Morning Glory: Best dialog and Plot? Maybe not. Huge Step Forward for Hollywood Stereotypes? ABSOLUTELY. She got the job and the guy with no compromises. And the old white male mentor made his big "romantic" gesture to keep her in the job. Seriously...every time I got cynical I was happily surprised and impressed. Passed the Bechdel Test in 2 minutes. And just for me....Patrick Wilson.

The Switch: Bored. Bored. Bored. Also...why is Hollywood's end of all 30?!?!?!

Posted by: Nimue at April 22, 2011 8:33 PM

compelled to comment for the first time on this site...

i've seen all the below, how can you possibly rank them all HIGHER than #37 Couples Retreat

#21 what happens in vegas
#27 made of honor
#35 valentine's day (one of the three worst movies i've ever seen, along with Freddie Got Fingered & Ninja Assassin)

Posted by: jgp19 at April 23, 2011 7:59 AM