web
counter
 

It's Uncanny, This Valley: The Ups And Downs Of Cinematic CGI (In)Humanity

By Rob Payne | Posted Under Seriously Random Lists | Comments (22)



pajibauncannyvalleyheadertintin.jpg

Recently, more images from Steven Spielberg’s and Peter Jackson’s computers’ animated adaptation of The Adventures of Tintin showed up at Bleeding Cool and the digital wizardry on display is clearly as impressive as it should be in such capable hands. But like the trailer before, Tintin and his faithful dog Snowy are boldly going where many have accidentally gone before: The Uncanny Valley. For those who don’t know, the Valley is the theoretical place where humanoid entities reside, who are so human but not quite human enough not to be pants-poopingly creepy. The chart below may help wrap your mind around that, but it’s really not as sexy as it seems.

pajibauncannyvalleygraph.jpg

Basically, C3P0 and Bender fall to the left of the divide with you and I falling to the right — the middle is where things get tricky, because not all non-humans are created equal. Not even close. You can thank the Japanese for providing us with a great many real-life creations that eat baby souls in the Uncanny Valley. See?

pajibauncannyvalleyscary.jpg

Told ya it wasn’t sexy.

So, while I didn’t write up a trade news item for Tintin’s inevitable fall into the abyss (due to clogged internet tubes and not really caring about Tintin in any substantial way), the new stills did inspire me to do one thing that I did promptly upon seeing them. I threw up in my mouth, but only a little bit. Then I decided to make a Seriously Random List of the Five Worst and Five Best instances of filmmakers trying to capture the indomitable human spirit with nothing but pixels and Photoshop.

Below are the results of some terrifying Google Image searches that seem to reveal one truism if you’re going balls out with CGI realism: Do not, under any circumstances, model your characters on the flesh and blood actors providing their voices, or real life celebrities in general. The human eye can immediately see the inauthentic features and it freaks us the fuck out. Of course, every rule does have its exceptions. (Also, it appears that the quality of the movie has almost nothing to do with whether or not audiences escape the Uncanny Valley unscathed. Enjoy!)


The Worst

Tom Hanks, Tom Hanks, Tom Hanks, and Tom Hanks in The Polar Express

pajibauncannyvalleypolarexpress.jpg

Robert Zemeckis’s Polar Express might currently be the most well known example of Uncannyvalliness, with Tom Hanks playing four distinct roles, and each character modeled after his doughy visage. After the film’s supposedly delightful Christmas release, a generation of children either suffered from unspeakable nightmares or they now have an unhealthy fascination with dead-eyed plasticity. Keep your eyes peeled on the Real Doll market for proof.

Angelina Jolie as Grendel’s Mom in Beowulf

pajibauncannyvalleyjoliebeowulf.jpg

As much as fanboys like me may have wanted Angelina Jolie to make another deposit into the pop culture spank bank with her golden butt in Beowulf, her vaguely blow-up doll features were amplified to near hilarity as a CGI monster. Thanks, in part, to her character’s self-imposed lizardly stiffness. C’est la vie, there’s always Hackers. It should be noted this is another Robert Zemeckis vehicle. We’re gonna see his name at least two more times on this list.

Jeff Bridges in Tron Legacy

pajibauncannyvalleytronlegacy.jpg

Admittedly, the Tron Legacy animators did an amazing job of turning Old Jeff Bridges into Younger Jeff Bridges, it’s probably the best special effect in a movie containing only special effects. But once Clu starts speaking and sharing scenes with supposedly living and breathing performers, it’s clear how unnatural he is. It’s also clear how much Clu wants to kill all humans, and that’s only partially due to Bridges’ performance. The phrase, a doll’s eyes… comes to mind.

Woody Allen and Sylvester Stallone in Antz

pajibauncannyvalleyantz.jpg

Most of the entries on this list, especially on the Worst side, are of characters meant to be human, but the Uncanny Valley also houses creatures who are merely meant to resemble humans. Thus, we come to DreamWorks’ first animated feature film, Antz, whose leads were meant to be caricatures of their vocal talents, specifically Woody Allen and Sylvester Stallone. Maybe it’s because the two actors are already pretty cartoonish in reality, but if you ever watch the movie, it’s really no wonder why A Bug’s Life is universally considered the superior CGI ant film of 1998.

All the humans in Mars Needs Moms

pajibauncannyvalleymarsneedsmoms.jpg

Full Disclosure: I have not seen Robert Zemeckis’s Mars Needs Moms, nor do I plan on seeing it. I don’t have to. Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, and I reserve the right to withhold judgment until I deem you worthy of reconsideration. The trailers made it obvious that even though he learned not to base his CGI people off of actual people, Zemeckis still hasn’t learned how to make them not look like chupacabra. It’s that whole empathy axis on the chart that he almost always fails to meet. Hell, even the aliens are more pleasing to look at than the humans (the ones we’re meant to empathize with):

pajibauncannyvalleymarsneedsmomsalien.jpg


The Best

Dr. Aki Ross in Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within

pajibauncannyvalleyffspiritswithin.jpg

While a decent movie that was an unfortunate waste of a franchise, Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within was one of the first movies to ever attempt such dramatic realism in a computer animated feature, and this was in 2001, before Gollum was even a gleam in WETA’s all-seeing eye. Not all of the characters in the movie pass the sniff test — hello Alec Baldwin! — but Ming-Na’s Aki Ross was good enough to appear in Maxim, and it was only slightly awkward.

Beowulf in Beowulf

pajibauncannyvalleybeowulfbeowulf.jpg

Like Spirits Within, list stalwart Robert Zemeckis’s Beowulf isn’t a total sale (see the aforementioned Grendel’s Mom and John Malkovich’s Unferth, though he is hardly the animator’s fault), but Beowulf himself is a phenomenal work of art. It’s easy to see when watching the movie that all the time and care was taken to make Ray Winstone’s interpretation of the character the definitive one, and it totally works. A big part of that is due to the fact that Beowulf does not look like Ray Winstone.

Arnold Schwarzenegger in Terminator: Salvation

pajibauncannyvalleyarnoldsalvation.jpg

The Governator’s rejuvenated cameo in Terminator: Salvation is one of the few, probably one of the only, instances where modeling the digital creation on a celebrity absolutely works. Part of that is due to the quality of the effects, but let’s be honest, Ahnuld’s performance in the first Terminator doesn’t exactly chew scenery so much as stare coldly at it, and his co-stars. Making a robotic actor appear to be a cyborg is a lot easier than making him emotive (see: Kindergarten Cop). That he fits seamlessly with Christian Bale is just icing on the dried up post-apocalyptic cake.

The Na’vi in Avatar

pajibauncannyvalleyavatar.jpg

Similar to Antz, James Cameron’s Native American stand-ins are less human and more human-like in his Dances With Wolves In Space, and Neytiri and Jake Sully’s avatar are similarly based on the movie’s stars, Zoe Saldana and Sam Worthington. Unlike Antz, the trick works here and you don’t want to claw your eyes out the entire run time. At least, not from the CGI. Okay, so, Sigourney Weaver’s alien representative is a little unsettling, but only because we’re so used to seeing her real face. Otherwise, her avatar isn’t that much of a horror show:

pajibauncannyvalleyavatar.jpg

Caesar in The Rise of the Planet of the Apes

pajibauncannyapesrisecaesar.jpg

Finding five suitable entries for the best attempts at avoiding the Uncanny Valley is hard enough including Avatar, so I suppose Caesar in the new Planet of the Apes might be a cop out. But, damn if I haven’t seen a better full-fledged CGI character. A lot of that credit, naturally, goes to actor, and motion capture performance art specialist, Andy Serkis, yet the digital artistry is immediately apparent. Caesar will always look computer generated in the same way Roger Rabbit will always be a cartoon, but his face expresses more genuine human emotion than James Franco ever will. There hasn’t been a CG creation that inhabits the tangible world quite like Caesar. As the soul of the film, he definitely scales the top of Uncanny Valley chart.

If you’re like me, any trip through the digitized Uncanny Valley is equally entertaining and frightening. Just remember, these things aren’t real and they can’t hurt you. At least not yet.

Rob Payne also writes the indie comic The Unstoppable Force, co-hosts the podcast We’re Not Fanboys, and tweets on the Twitter @RobOfWar. He barely climbs out of the Uncanny Valley himself sometimes, so this list is really just the pot calling the kettle back.











Like Zack Attack Said, Friends Forever, Always Till The End: The Best Female Friendship Movies | Great Cast! Terrible Movie! 10 Awful Movies Despite the Awesome Talent Involved











Comments

Alec Baldwin, not Adam.


(Already fixed, but thanks for playing! -RobP)

Posted by: Todd at September 22, 2011 3:24 PM

Alan Rickman had a fantastic CGI facelift in the final Harry Potter movie. Can someone do that with my jawline? Do we have people for that?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at September 22, 2011 3:29 PM

Enjoyed this list! Thanks!

The one that I find most out there that I've seen in movies over the years is that doll from Arnold's movie The Sixth Day. I think the doll is supposed to have that askew look, but that still doesn't stop it from being unsettling.

I'm now imagining having dreams populated by denizens of the Uncanny Valley. That would be creepy but cool.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at September 22, 2011 3:39 PM

Not even a mention of Gollem? Even when you mentioned Andy Serkis? That would probably top my list, and it at least deserves to be mentioned, I would think.

Posted by: logar at September 22, 2011 4:01 PM

And if I mention the word "mention" one more time, I'm going to strangle myself.

Posted by: logar at September 22, 2011 4:01 PM

You praised Gollum but didn't include him...

I'm not sure I was ever bothered by Antz in that way. As for Zemeckis, I don't see how anyone green lights that crap past the CG test stage. Whoever can't see that that shit is creepy as hell needs a special test.

Posted by: Protoguy at September 22, 2011 4:06 PM

Not sure why 'Antz' is on this list, but everything else you said is true.

Also, I don't understand the point of creating really good fake human imitations, if we already have real humans to begin with.

Posted by: OldSchool60 at September 22, 2011 4:10 PM

Honestly, I wasn't sure where to put Gollum. He was definitely impressive at the time, but I don't think he's aged nearly as well as, say, Dr. Aki Ross, and it boiled down to him not being either one of the best or one of the worst. If it weren't for Caesar, he might have fit there.

As for Antz, the Stallone character has always bugged me (pun intended). It's an itch I've been wanting to scratch for years. Feels good to finally be able to move past it.

Posted by: RobP at September 22, 2011 4:27 PM

While Clu is definitely Uncanny Valley creepy and it was easy to differentiate him from the real Jeff Bridges, I wouldn't call that a "worst". In a movie that was pretty boring and had a lot of issues, I feel as though Clu was one of the things they really got right and that the level of uncanny valley given to him was both spot on and necessary. I will agree that in most other situations it would not have worked, but this was one where (granted, I am assuming) you were legitimately supposed to be looking at him and thinking "something is really not right".

Posted by: DominaNefret at September 22, 2011 4:34 PM

I think where the character Gollum shined is when he interacted with the environment and the other characters physically. The scenes where he talked to himself, or there were tight close-ups were the ones where they lost me a bit.

Posted by: logar at September 22, 2011 4:59 PM

Speaking of monkeys (we were speaking of them, right?) I remember being suitably impressed by King Kong's expressions recently. Not that I would admit to staring at zoo gorillas much, nonetheless Kong's resemblance to the real thing was uncanny. Real gorillas really do possess that range of facial expressions.

Posted by: Obst N. Gemuse at September 22, 2011 5:48 PM

My only problem with Caesar was his eyes. Too much white. I'm sure it was done to give him a little more human expressiveness (which I don't think was necessary), but it's the one thing that broke the illusion for me. Chimp eyes, like a lot of animals, are primarily iris and pupil, not much white.

I think Gollum's help up pretty well, but no, not likely to have the same longevity as Aki Ross. Unlike Logar, I felt the schizzo scenes cemented the tormented nature of the character and made him more "hobbit".

Posted by: Protoguy at September 22, 2011 6:41 PM

I don't mind Gollum's exclusion. He doesnt' blink hardly at all in those movies. Boom. Takes me right out of the movie.

Posted by: superasente at September 22, 2011 7:42 PM

The Avatar aliens just looked like cartoons to me. They never looked even remotely real, but then again, considering that everything around them was mostly animated, they fit in. But when they were surrounded by humans the whole thing just fell apart.

One that failed miserably for me was Andy in Toy Story 3. He had dead eyes and give me the absolute CREEPS. What's worse is that they kept showing him in close-up and it never, ever looked good to me. It kinda ruined the whole ending of the movie for me.

Posted by: Figgy at September 22, 2011 9:57 PM

i really don't get the hate for Mars Needs Moms. Joan Cusack and the tubby guy's effects didn't creep me out at all.

The boy ended up looking weird coz they made him from the ground up, i think. they shud've just modelled him on a young Seth Green or the actual kid who did the voice over (and what's up with hiring Seth Green to do the motion cap and not use his voice? is he dat broke?).

Seriously Rob, watch it. it's helluva lot better than the overrated Rango dat everybody seems to have hard on for here.

Posted by: haplo at September 22, 2011 11:08 PM

And no mention of January Jones in X-Men: First Class?

Posted by: Jordan at September 23, 2011 1:03 AM

But see, the great thing about CLU is he BELONGS in the Uncanny Valley. He's supposed to be a chilling, inhuman reflection his creator's younger self. That's, like, the theme of the movie.

I'm not sure you can even count Arnold in Salvation. He's not so much a character as a digital body double. No dialogue, and maybe a minute of screen time before he gets facemelted.

Did I hear you say both that Aki Ross was a successful CGI human, AND that Final Fantasy was a decent movie? First off, she never looked too weird because she never actually emotes. She's a bland, tedious, one-note character, in a film so awkwardly plotted and laughably self-important, we honestly didn't care enough about the characters to be bothered by their plastic ugliness. And what do you mean, before Gollum was a gleam in WETA's eye? Two Towers came out ONE YEAR after Final Fantasy, and finished filming two years prior. Hell, Andy Serkis had probably already performed his motion capture scenes by the time Sci Fi Asian Barbie came along.

And how do you not add Christmas Carol to the naughty list? Bob Cratchit looked like a scarecrow wearing a rubber Gary Oldman Halloween mask.

Posted by: Robin at September 23, 2011 4:41 AM

The humans in Wall-E I think fall into the Best category. They're cartoonish, but still human CGI. If Antz qualifies for this list, Wall-E should at least be considered.

Posted by: Ashley at September 23, 2011 9:38 AM

Hiding out amongst the ordinary gorillas and chimps at "Ape Management" where slaves are trained (i.e. tortured and conditioned), he forments plans to strike back the cruel men who took his adopted father away from him.

Posted by: rosario at September 23, 2011 9:39 AM

Tintin would probably look better if it was directed by STEVEN Spielberg and not his cousin STEPHEN.


(Touche. Fixed! -RobP)

Posted by: Terry at September 23, 2011 2:12 PM

I think where Wall-E and Antz and the others like them fail the list is exactly that sense of cartoon-ness. The film-makers were creating caricatures, not human likenesses. They're not even close to The Valley.

Posted by: Protoguy at September 23, 2011 4:29 PM

does a head matter ?
I know that this review was concentrating on the whole CG character, but surely "Benjamin Button" needs some sort of mention?

I feel that Digital Domain 's team totally nailed it there.

Posted by: Cris Blyth at September 28, 2011 8:59 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time