web
counter
 

Their Ugliest Roles: Jennifer Aniston

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Miscellaneous | Comments (45)



001TGG_Jennifer_Aniston_101.jpg

Welcome to the newest acclaimed series on Pajiba, a series that the New York Times has already proclaimed, “Powerful, biting, but ultimately pointless, another futile exercise in Pajiba’s ongoing quest to reduce celebrity to its base elements,” and the AV Club has hailed as “inconsequential and inane.”

Today we kick off the series with our first subject: Jennifer Aniston. The year: 2002. The movie: The Good Girl. After eight years of playing the gorgeous Rachel Green in the television sitcom “Friends,” and and thus far failing to establish herself as a feature actress as the love interest in films like, The Object of My Affection, Rock Star, and Office Space, Jennifer Aniston needed to shake up her career. At the time, she was best known for popularizing a certain style of hair, often referred to as the Rachel Green Bob.

mcx-rachel-green-0510-de-8095956.jpg

Although the hairstyle only lasted a few years, it had created an indelible mark, and Ms. Aniston — who in 2002 was married to American film star Brad Pitt — needed to create some distance from her “Friends” character that neither her mega-celebrity husband nor her body’s unnatural flexibly could create.

JenniferAniston-GQ-2.jpg

Ms. Aniston was at a crossroads in her career, and rather than continue contorting her body, the actress attempted to show some flexibility in her acting range. She made the difficult decision to play against the stunning good looks that had allowed her to achieve so much small-screen success. She decided to play ugly. She took the lead role in the Mike White scripted comedy drama, The Good Girl. It was a bold move for Ms. Aniston. After so many years using her body to create an image of effortless sexiness

00001f.jpg

Ms. Aniston had decided to exchange a man’s tie for a smock.

Jen-in-The-Good-Girl-jenni.jpg

Gruesome, isn’t it?

Shedding three layers of cosmetics, tying her hair up, and eschewing her high-heels and glamorous wardrobe for ill-fitting sweaters and a name tag, Aniston threw herself into the role of the cashier Justine Last, no doubt expecting that Academy Award nominations would rain down upon her. Surely, the powers that be would recognize the sacrifices of an actress who would dare cover up this pristinely airbrushed flesh-on-bone figure

jenniferanistonGQ300.jpg

with a man’s over-sized coat.

Jennifer Anisto.jpg

She would even go so far as to play the unfaithful wife of the Shrek-like John C. Reilly, and seeing Ms. Aniston holding a generic beer can, the match felt so natural. Hidden beneath those overalls, it was impossible to believe that Ms. Aniston could advance beyond the physical station of Reilly, with his beer gut and misshapen teeth.

The-Good-Girl-movie-f02.jpg

Sadly, the move would backfire. Despite the artful direction of Miguel Arteta, a masterful script from Mike White, and capable performances from both Aniston and her supporting cast (Jake Gyllenhaal, Zooey Deschanel, John C. Reilly, and Mike White himself), the daring career move would not pay off for Ms. Aniston. The world simply wasn’t ready to see such an unflattering depiction of the sitcom star, warts and all. It was almost too sickening for the American viewing public to stomach. The movie opened in limited release in the summer of 2002 with a meager $150,000 and would never rise above number 9 on the box-office charts. A month later, “Friends” began it’s penultimate season, and The Good Girl was all but forgotten, remembered only as Jennifer Aniston’s brief experiment with unholy frumpiness.


GG_Jennifer_Aniston_055.jpg

Over the next decade, despite a series of hits and misfires, many still point to The Good Girl (known pejoratively among many as The Ugly Girl) as the reason that Aniston hasn’t amassed the same kind of success as Sandra Bullock or Meg Ryan. The collective memory of Hollywood is long, and it would take years before they’d completely forget the blemishes that Aniston revealed in The Good Girl. It would also take nearly a decade before Aniston would even consider taking a role that didn’t take full advantage of her stunning good looks. She finally climbed the mountain again last month, however, putting her hair back and wearing eyeglasses for the first 20 minutes of the Adam Sandler comedy, Just Go With It, a brief but scarring reminder of the hideousness she displayed all those years ago in The Good Girl.

JustGoWithIt575-thumb-560xauto-29067.jpg









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



"Being Human": The Yankee Version | Pajiba Dirty Talk: Why I Don't Sleep with Strangers (Often)









Comments

I guess you've never seen "Management"?

Posted by: grumpiestoldman at March 23, 2011 3:38 PM

Are you being sarcastic with the "stunning good looks"? Cause Jennifer Aniston is pretty much a butterface.

Posted by: Yesplease at March 23, 2011 3:41 PM

Wow, that's HER in Just Go With It? Did Charlize Theron's makeup artist from Monster turn her into that? Somebody's getting an Oscar.

Posted by: Paultera at March 23, 2011 3:44 PM

Everytime I think there are men out there who laughed at Adam Sandler pointing at Aniston in this movie (I saw the trailer, unfortunately) and saying "I wanted to have a HOT first wife, not THIS!", I die a little bit inside.

I think it's a wonderful character test, though:
"Did you like 'Just Go With It?'"*
"Yes! It was hilarious!"
"RELATIONSHIP OVER"

*they could have been tricked into seeing the movie

Posted by: Holly at March 23, 2011 3:48 PM

Nitpicky me: not so much a Rachel Green bob as a variant on the Sally Hershberger shag (see: Meg Ryan, circa the same period).

Posted by: Jerry at March 23, 2011 4:14 PM

I would like to admit, here and now...I hated Friends*. I hated Seinfeld. I hated Curb Your Enthusiasm.

*except for Smelly Cat.

Posted by: dammitjanet at March 23, 2011 4:14 PM

I honestly don't get why people hate this woman. Is it some Friends thing? Because I never really watched that show, although I was aware of its cultural impact (what a sad sentence to type).

I don't find her stunningly attractive, but she's certainly pretty. She has charisma (distinct from her looks), which is actually kind of rare to me in Hollywood.

Most of her work is rom-coms or just straight bad comedy, so I haven't seen her in a lot of roles. She did what was necessary (not much) in Office Space and Bruce Almighty. I thought she was quite good in The Good Girl actually. I was forced to watch Love Happens on an intercontinental flight, and my distaste for the inane script still allowed an acknowledgement that she pulled off what was necessary.

I feel like the guy who doesn't get the joke. Why do people hate her? You could argue she takes superficial roles, but is there a problem with somebody working what they know and staying safe? Is it the whole Pitt/her/Jolie thing? I just don't get it.

-Frob

Posted by: frobme at March 23, 2011 4:15 PM

Here Friends with Money character was very similar to her Good Girl one.

Posted by: homeslice at March 23, 2011 4:18 PM

Frob, part of my disdain for her is seeing her name listed each year as a top-earning actress/celebrity. And each year I ask, why? I dunno, mediocrity pays. But that's me. I don't like her, someone elese does. Tea, anyone?

Posted by: DenG at March 23, 2011 4:21 PM

::sets up lawn chair::

::sips chocolate Ovaltine::

::enjoys the show::

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at March 23, 2011 4:29 PM

Jerry, I'll be nitpicky right back. No matter if it was a derivative hairstyle, it was seen as the Rachel Green bob by the nation, one that was talked about and copied ad nauseum.

Posted by: noodlestein at March 23, 2011 4:37 PM

I defend Jennifer Aniston because of this movie, no matter how misguided the script and the direction is. And because of her CV up to 2006.

But her newer movies make it so. Fucking. Difficult.

Posted by: Paolo at March 23, 2011 4:38 PM

@frobme- Thank you! I always feel alone at the party for liking Aniston. I also think she can act when given the chance. Unfortunately, I think the roles she is offered are intended to capitalize on Rachel Greene, because that is what Hollywood still thinks we want to see.

She had great comic chops in "Just go with it", and held her own to Sandler, which is no small feat since his humor is hard for nearly all of his female co-stars to deal with.

Anyway I like her, I like her roles, and I will likely continue to defend Jen at the cost of fellow pajibian derision and loathing.

Posted by: JuiceinLA at March 23, 2011 4:40 PM

ps: I should have thanked @Paolo too, but you hadn't posted as I wrote mine...

Posted by: JuiceinLA at March 23, 2011 4:42 PM

Yeah, I don't get the hatred either. She's completely inoffensive to me.

Posted by: kayla at March 23, 2011 4:44 PM

I really do like her most of the time, but like I've said before, the fact that she's fucking everywhere all the damn time just makes me feel exhausted. I'm just sick of her face, and the tabloids telling me she's pathetic (and I don't believe she is at all) and her terrible movies. It's just exhausting.

Posted by: figgy at March 23, 2011 4:54 PM

Heh. I dig sarcasm. Yes, she took such a RISK in this role! Similar to what Charlize Theron did in Monster!

To think this was her BEST acting. She admitted she had to have a coach help her constantly to keep her from flailing her hands around a la Rachel Green a la Jennifer Aniston. She stared forlornely into space a lot. Her greatest role.

Ug. And I've said it before, but I dislike her because she's so damn boring. Also, she just plays herself in every role, except in The Good Girl, in which, as I said, she kept her hands at her sides and stared sadly.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at March 23, 2011 4:59 PM

But aside from that: I love the idea of this column. The best part is that there are so many, many terrible examples to write on, and hell, it's just funny.

Posted by: figgy at March 23, 2011 4:59 PM

"Despite the artful direction of Miguel Arteta, a masterful script from Mike White, and capable performances from both Aniston and her supporting cast (Jake Gyllenhaal, Zooey Deschanel..."

Rowles, you ignorant slut, the problems are obvious from the beginning, look at that cast. It reads like perfect trifecta of box-office failure. NONE, none of them could open a succesfull movie to save their lives.

And another thing, there is NOTHING effortless in Rachel's career/image trajectory. Everything she does smacks of handling and effort.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at March 23, 2011 5:06 PM

Yeah, I'm with frobme, Paolo, JuiceinLa and kayla. I don't get the Aniston hatred. And who are these people that think she's ugly?

Posted by: An Atlantan at March 23, 2011 5:40 PM

I think one reason for much of the disdain for Jennifer Aniston is that she seems to think that by taking on one role on a single occasion that actually requires her to WORK as an actor and not just fall back on her looks and her habitual and tired caricature she mindlessly does in every other movie she does that it suddenly means she should expect us to give her a pass on the mounds of crap she's forced us to endure throughout her overpaid career and treat her as a respectable thespian. Oddly enough even now she gives off a vibe of bitchiness that the masses still haven't.

While she's by no means the worst actress to come along, I still really can't take her seriously. Putting in actual effort one time doesn't earn you respect in any career field. Doing so all of the time, or at least the vast majority of it, tends to give you a better chance. I've seen this movie and while I thought she did better than her usual output, I still didn't like her performance. Perhaps if she had invested this kind of effort both in her role selection and portrayals EVERY time and not just once to get a token "See, I CAN act!" award, perhaps her craft as a whole would have improved.

Posted by: bleujayone at March 23, 2011 5:54 PM

Yup. I like Jen. I'm perfectly ok with that. And I really like some of those pictures.
Good thing I only need one hand to read this article on my Phone .....

Posted by: Odnon at March 23, 2011 5:58 PM

I think she seems sweet and I do think she's funny. I do not, however, think she's gorgeous.

Posted by: samantha t at March 23, 2011 5:58 PM

Unpopular offering, but here nonetheless:
If anybody deserves Aniston's status on the basis of sheer ability, I nominate Lisa Kudrow.

Posted by: Jerry at March 23, 2011 6:50 PM

Awww, this is why I love Pajiba. Such incredibly bitchy articles & reviews. I still like Jennifer Aniston though and wish her a year end from whirlwind affair to marriage to Robert Pattinson or some sexy young beast.

On the other hand I have since, discovering this site, become the most cynical amongst my peers when it comes to movies and shite actors.

Posted by: Jean at March 23, 2011 7:59 PM

homeslice, thank you for that info. I've always been curious about The Good Girl, but if it just turns out to be Friends without Money I'll pass. I HATED Friends With Money with the fire of a thousand suns. If I go to hell, it will be playing on a loop.

I think Jennifer Aniston is the actressin' equivalent of beige paint. It's very serviceable, goes with everything, and is easy on the eyes. Otherwise, meh.

Posted by: leuce7 at March 23, 2011 8:42 PM


another vote for frob & the gang .... she is fine at
what she does and she is plenty pretty enough.

Posted by: snake at March 23, 2011 8:51 PM

I don't get it.

She is the epitome of mediocre.
She is wonderbread.
Is she painful to look at? No.
Is she attractive? I see more charming and prettier women on a daily basis.

The averageness is oppressive!

Her acting you ask? Its just rachel green experiencing different moods.

Posted by: dinka at March 23, 2011 9:07 PM

Dinka, that is the best description of her EVER.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at March 23, 2011 9:49 PM

She's as pretty as she is boring.

Posted by: Mr. Stitch at March 23, 2011 10:37 PM

dinka - absolutely ditto.

And she was still pretty in The Good Girl and in Friends With Money. Her "best" actung, though, was still in the first three seasons of Friends, which says a lot about both.

Posted by: godzilla_foil at March 23, 2011 11:06 PM

I don't really care that she's mediocre, or whether or not she's pretty. What I don't like is being manipulated. Jennifer Aniston makes a tonne money convincing people she is the pathetic girl next door, when she is anything but. I don't want to feel sorry for a movie star. I want to be completely forget who she is when she's on screen. Jennifer Aniston doesn't act when she's on screen and doesn't stop when she's off, and that is what I don't like about her.

Posted by: Tits McGee at March 23, 2011 11:14 PM

I'm going to have to agree with the NY Times about how pointless these segments are going to be. Maybe if the movie were worse I could tolerate the pretentious sarcasm, but honestly, I liked the Good Girl and I don't think Aniston was trying to play ugly, she was trying to play ordinary. A regular woman working a shitty job and in a thankless marriage she wants to escape. Even if it comes off a little phony, I love the dialogue in this movie and hearing people talk about being "put upon" and carrying on with their lives because that is what you do.

"Every woman should have one beau before any woman has two."

Posted by: valerie at March 23, 2011 11:45 PM

I'm feeling irate at half of you today.

I'll put it this way, if you are not attracted to Jen, that's OK. If you think she is not among the best looking women on the planet, that's OK. If you dislike her acting chops, that's OK.

If you think she is objectively unattractive, ugly or anything other than a pretty woman with a decent rig, read below...


...you are an internet troll, and should probably stop being such a big man/woman at your computer screen, lube up, and go fuck yourself.

Sorry for the picture, but I'm sick of people pulling down chicks for their looks when (a) so many men get a free pass, and (b) the women are good looking but people just feel the need to be contrary.

Posted by: Peter G at March 24, 2011 12:12 AM

I stand second to no man or gay woman in my adoration of the Aniston. She can cry on my shoulder AN.Y.TIME.

And I thought "The Good Girl" was pretty good.

Ignore the haters, Jen, I still love you.

I mean, come on:

www.entertainmentwise.com/photos/58036/3/Jennifer-Aniston-To-Write-A-Tell-All-Book

Posted by: , at March 24, 2011 1:20 AM

I Hate Aniston, but like The Good Girl. Maybe it's a Mike White thing.

Posted by: John G. at March 24, 2011 1:50 AM

I have nothing against Aniston but, like dozens of other Hollywood denizons who make oodles of money and magazine covers, I really have nothing for her either. She's not among my personal Top 20 Actors who will someday star in the engrossingly heartwrenching action-packed vehicle The Cinekat Story.

Posted by: cinekat at March 24, 2011 5:01 AM

Peter G., get over yourself. Everyone has different opinions and they're allowed to have different opinions. Some people on here are so consistently ridiculous with their inability to accept that other people don't agree with them. Attractiveness is subjective and there are so freaking many people who say Aniston is unattractive to them that I don't understand your arrogance. I know it's earth shattering that not everyone shares your opinion of what makes a woman cute but I assure you their opinions are as valid as they are inconsequential in the valuation of them as a human being.

In summation, you can't always be right because sometimes there is no right and no wrong. Sorry peanut.

Posted by: becks at March 24, 2011 8:23 AM

And when Dustin read Valerie's comment:

I'm going to have to agree with the NY Times about how pointless these segments are going to be,

he yelled, BINGO! loud enough to wake Mrs. Pajiba-Hyphenate and his darling child.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at March 24, 2011 9:05 AM

Yeah I'll get right on that, peeeter

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at March 24, 2011 12:49 PM

I really liked seeing the Good Girl... *shrugs*

Posted by: Melina at March 24, 2011 1:15 PM

Best. Comments. ever

Posted by: James at March 25, 2011 10:44 PM

There are plenty of reasons to dislike her. I remember when she descibed her vacations to Cabo and staying in swanky, luxurious hotel as "charity for the Mexican people." Then, she promoted some environmental causes, touting how she only takes "3 minute showers." Meanwhile, she has a 10,000 square foot home, drives SUVs, and promotes bottled water (the #1 landfill polluter). As far as I'm concerned, she's clueless, vapid and hypocritical. Nevermind the fact that she's a bad actress and has decided to prioritize money/fame over good acting and quality movies. What's admirable about her? I don't get the people who think we should all admire Aniston because they are fans themselves. Sorry, but I don't find anything about this woman admirable at all??? Oh well, I guess everyone has their favorites. To each his own, I guess.

Oh, and I find this post very funny. Thanks for the laugh.

Posted by: shell at March 27, 2011 2:08 AM

God forbid Dustin, or anyone, make fun of Aniston's bad movies and her bad taste in photoshoots. Who told her that looking like an orange, oompa-loompa porn star was a good career move? That picture with the tie is awful. She's just a bad actress, too. I thought The Good Girl was not that good, honestly. And Friends with Money was as painful as Aniston's constipated expression she wore throughout the whole movie. She's just bad, bad, bad. But of course, her fans will label anyone who doesn't bow down to the Rom-Com Queen a "hater." So mature.

Posted by: pookies at March 28, 2011 6:25 PM

Going on about how you don't like Jennifer Aniston keeps her in the public eye more than liking her and not talking about it. There's no accounting for personal preference, and pretty much all actors are hypocrites. None of it is worth getting mad at strangers on the internet.

Posted by: Uncle Mikey at April 20, 2011 11:23 AM