web
counter
 

The Further Evolution of Pajiba

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Miscellaneous | Comments (332)



godtopusd.jpg

In addition to a lot of great movies and an inordinate amount of drinking (and for my part, a few embarrassing Facebook updates), SXSW also allowed most of us on staff here at Pajiba to discuss the state of the site and where we want to go with it in the future. And miraculously, in between Long Island Ice teas in mason jars and Drag Me to Hell, we actually did have an opportunity to talk about the direction. In fact, we all came back from Austin more focused, and though we haven’t announced any of the site changes, we’ve been quietly moving in a more positive direction, I think.

You may have noticed, for instance, that there are now nightly trade news updates. In the past, I’d wake up on a Wednesday morning, for instance, and scour Tuesday’s trade news, and then pre-write Thursday’s site and schedule it. The result was that much of our trade news was at least a day and a half old. Now, we write it as it comes in — it’s no longer prescheduled. We cover trade news first thing in the morning, then in the afternoon, and again before we got to bed, and we publish in real time. In terms of timeliness, we wanted to be able to compete with other sites.

You might have noticed, also, that Stacey has also added other movie blogs to Pajiba Love. There are news and features on other movie blogs that we often don’t get a chance to write about, and we’ve been around long enough now that I’m not so insecure as to think that our readers would abandon us if you found a better site through those links.

But more importantly, we’re also making a concerted effort to write more, actual reviews, a campaign spearheaded by Prisco. We’re trying to cover a lot of those smaller indie films we once didn’t bother with, and we also brought in Henry Britt, who we hope will help us resurrect our Underappreciated Gems, Pajiba Blockbuster, and Hangover Theater series (along with our other new critic, Steven Lloyd Wilson). We’re also doing more television coverage (and Sarah Carlson will be helping with that in the coming weeks). Our goal is to post at least two, sometimes three reviews a day, to go along with the trade coverage, the seriously random lists, and our usual features.

But there was another suggestion bandied around at SXSW, and it’s one that I’ve been wrestling with for the last few weeks. We love the site’s Eloquents — we really do. But lately, in our minds, the focus has drifted — more and more comment threads are hijacked and off topic. A few of the staffers (who will go unnamed) suggested that we try to steer the conversation back to the reviews and the news, etc. We talked about requiring registration to comment, but it’s something that takes up more server resources than we’d like; we’d finally sped up commenting, and we didn’t want to slow it down. So, another suggestion was proffered: We should moderate comments.

I was on the fence about it, reluctant to do so. But a couple of things have happened since SXSW that has made me come around to the idea. First of all, a couple of weeks ago, I admit that I got a little steamed when the Eloquents completely hijacked Dan’s wonderful I Love You, Man review. There were 401 comments on that review, and only about 20 were related to the movie.

I appreciate that we have a lot of readers who like to spend their time in our comments sections shooting the shit, but that was fucking ridiculous. Bucdaddy, I believe, had turned the conversation toward which Eloquent would be the best FREEBIE (in other words, which would you most like to have sex with). Not only was it completely off-topic, but as a lawyer, I was fairly concerned with the sexual harassment repercussions. It was absurd and a little scary. This is a movie site, not your fucking sexual playground. And I don’t know how many more times we can suffer through Pookie hijacking another thread with his off-topic nonsense.

The other thing that turned the tide for me was that interview we ran a week ago, which featured Kevin Smith talking about his relationship with the Internet. The one thing that really stuck out for me was his statement to the effect that, “It got to the point where, instead of arguing with these trolls for three hours, I just decided to … beep … delete their comments. It made life much easier.”

I could relate.

And so, from this day forward, we’ve decided to moderate comments. And we’re going to be fucking fascists about it. Off-topic comments will never see the light of day. Comments of a sexual nature: Delete. Hijacking threads: Delete. In fact, when someone decides to start railing on one of the staffers here: Fuck it. Delete. It’s our fucking site. We don’t have to deal with the bullshit anymore. It’s time to make the conversation a little more civil, a little more on-topic, and a little less hostile towards your “overlords.”

And that’s the way it’s going to be.









The Education of Charlie Banks Review | SXSW Music













Comments

HA.

Posted by: boo at April 1, 2009 11:15 AM

April Fools! You had me going there for a minute...

Posted by: Ashlie at April 1, 2009 11:17 AM

I'll put up with any format changes if it means I might get to discuss the tiny little films I feel like no one else sees. More reviews can't be a bad thing so long as the quality doesn't drop.

Posted by: Robert at April 1, 2009 11:18 AM

Thank fucking God.

Posted by: I Love Beets at April 1, 2009 11:20 AM

HA.

Posted by: boo at April 1, 2009 11:20 AM

So I suppose this would be the appropriate post to discuss how when she moves to Boston for the semester, Sofia and I were planning on being roommates and making/distributing hard-core pornography to satiate the desperate (and frankly disgusting) desires of the greater Pajibaland population?

Damn, and there were going to be toys involved.

Posted by: Marra at April 1, 2009 11:20 AM

What day is it today?

Posted by: Pilot at April 1, 2009 11:20 AM

And so it begins!!!!

Posted by: PissBoy at April 1, 2009 11:20 AM

What is the date today?

Posted by: Pilot at April 1, 2009 11:21 AM

April Fools Motherfuckers.

Posted by: ed newman at April 1, 2009 11:21 AM

Good one, Dustin. Last year's was pure gold, but this is pretty good, too. Now I'm off to pop some corn and hopefully get a few laughs....

Posted by: Kolby at April 1, 2009 11:22 AM

HA.

Posted by: boo at April 1, 2009 11:22 AM

I'm loving the idea. When I see a review that already has 200 or so comments on it in just a few hours, I rarely bother to read it because I know it's probably just been "hijacked" by a group of regulars who are trying to outwit and outflirt each other, and it just gets tiresome. It seems like some people come here to use the comments as their personal "stage" and at times the attempts at cleverness, inside jokes, and sexual innuendos border on desperate. Reading some comment threads is sometimes like listening to someone tell you about the dream they had last night that you weren't in: boring, pointless, and attention-whoring.

Posted by: tinmo at April 1, 2009 11:22 AM

Cual dia es hoy? El primero?

Posted by: Pilot at April 1, 2009 11:22 AM

I support the moderation. It will get rid of the damn spam bots eventually too.

Posted by: PissBoy at April 1, 2009 11:23 AM

Awesome.
Wow Dustin you are Kicking Ass and Taking Names.
Im a lurker anyway but it will be cool to actually post about the review instead of trying to jump in on other peoples conversations and then feeling like a gooseberry who just doesn't get the joke ( a feeling I often have)
So good luck with the Fascist, Overlord Moderation. Just don't let the power go to your head dude....its a long fall down.

Posted by: Nieve at April 1, 2009 11:23 AM

fuck pookie!

Posted by: Ted at April 1, 2009 11:24 AM

although...the spambots do provide a source of 'pause' from the current topic to think about that one person missing in my life...but i think I can deal with that. I'm just gonna miss Julie since she obviously won't have anything to talk about now.

Posted by: PissBoy at April 1, 2009 11:27 AM

Wow, really?

Hmmm...

Posted by: Trouble at April 1, 2009 11:30 AM

Oh holy fuck!

I forgot to look at the calendar. You got me, guys...

Posted by: Trouble at April 1, 2009 11:31 AM

I'm quite certain that a few folks are thinking "No Pookie = No Pajiba". I am not in that minority.

Posted by: Spender at April 1, 2009 11:31 AM

You are NOT going to get me this year. Sister Act, my ass.

I am onto you!!!

Posted by: AM at April 1, 2009 11:32 AM

April Fools Day posts are my favorite! Those silly people who support this and want to just discuss movies... pshhhh. That's just silly.

Posted by: angiev at April 1, 2009 11:33 AM

April Fools!?

Posted by: Nate at April 1, 2009 11:33 AM

Fair enough, although is there any idea of how much of a lag there would be with doing this? If someone responds to an already moderated comment and then that isn't let through for some time it might make conversation about the films/reviews hard to follow. Though I suppose that happens now anyway with people reading through and replying to people.

Posted by: Carrie at April 1, 2009 11:33 AM

Thank you.

Posted by: amanda47 at April 1, 2009 11:34 AM

realization of what day it is in three, two, one......................

Posted by: slower lower at April 1, 2009 11:35 AM

All of my party planning for Butthole Day '09 was in vain.

Posted by: branded at April 1, 2009 11:35 AM

This is a movie site,not your fucking sexual playground.

I have been sorely misinformed.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at April 1, 2009 11:36 AM

Hooray! It's like the Bush era, only in the form of an internet media review site! Soon there'll be a war on spamming, and you'll tap people's keyboards for information, and you'll torture people who don't like your reviews or disagree with your occasional snobbish arrogance!

Yay!

Posted by: ChristianH at April 1, 2009 11:37 AM

Thank goodness. I rarely post myself because by the time I get to read the review, no one is even on topic anymore.

Posted by: Jadine at April 1, 2009 11:38 AM

Hm. I'm not sure how I feel about this.

I mean, on the one hand, I'm all for keeping things more on topic, and not scaring off the newcomers with inside jokes and whatnot. Plus, I imagine it's incredibly frustrating for a critic to come back to a piece they've written to find the comment thread has devolved into a virtual orgy.

On the other, it's part of what makes Pajiba what it is, and also, it's censorship, which makes me cringey, even when it's justifiable censorship.

As I say, I'm a bit torn.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at April 1, 2009 11:41 AM

April Fools?

Posted by: Bucko at April 1, 2009 11:42 AM

Hooray for the "writing more" decision!
The additions of Britt, Wilson and the wonderful Sarah Carlson are going to add a lot of depth to an already talented staff and will provide us that much more to read and enjoy.
Good work, Mr. Rowles!

Posted by: Spender at April 1, 2009 11:43 AM

Dear Overlords,
Please don't let this be an April Fool's Day joke.
Thank you.

Posted by: The Land Snark at April 1, 2009 11:43 AM

This is dumb - and false. You people believe what any website says they're changing on April 1st?

Posted by: Bucko at April 1, 2009 11:44 AM

Apparently any entry mantioning A P R I L F I R S T is moderated automatically.

Well played.

Posted by: Bucko at April 1, 2009 11:45 AM

Today is the Tomorrow of March 31, FWIW.

Posted by: Bucko at April 1, 2009 11:46 AM

I asked folks very nicely last year - if you want to goof off, make jokes, whatever - do it in Pajiba Love, or in trade news, or something like that. There are plenty of opportunities for the communal goof-fest.

But I have to admit, it does get pretty fucking frustrating when you put forth the time and effort to produce a review, only to have it completely devolve into nonsense.

It is, to be quite frank, a bit of a slap in the face to the writer. We've never said it, but there it is.

Posted by: TK at April 1, 2009 11:46 AM

It seems like some people come here to use the comments as their personal "stage"

Uh, this is the Internet. That's pretty much what it's for.

It will be interesting to see. Either it will work, and the site will flourish with delicious on-topic conversations that connect divergent threads of movie wisdom, or it will cut the comments down to five apiece, and I can yet again wander the internets in my own personal diaspora, weeping and rending my garments.

Either way, what fun.

Posted by: twig at April 1, 2009 11:46 AM

Plus, Pajiba's rolling out new T-shirts! They're red, with a picture of Dustin in a chinbeard. Submit or die, prollys!

Bout time, Rowles. This shit's gotten out of hand.

Posted by: hatemail at April 1, 2009 11:47 AM

Oh, I see what you did there...

Posted by: feramones at April 1, 2009 11:47 AM

Moderation is a pretty big time commitment.

In fact, the time it took to moderate my last several posts about the date alone must be annoying.

Posted by: Bucko at April 1, 2009 11:47 AM

How do you even write a comment that gets through?

Posted by: Bucko at April 1, 2009 11:48 AM

Okay, I'm a critic here, so I see where you're coming from. I didn't mean to come off as too harsh before.

But, and I didn't want to mention this because I know it's a sore spot for all of us, half of the fun of AlabamaPink and her comments, not to mention countless others we've grown to know and love around here, was that they weren't always on-topic. Let's be honest: How much would we have known about her illness or her struggles or, more inspiring, her humor if she hadn't gone off-topic.

I mean, there is a line that can be crossed, and it does get crossed. But we have to remember our roots here. There's a spirit here, a community, that survives on communication. To hinder that will make the site dull and wasteful.

And as someone who hates off-topic comments on my pieces, I mean that with all of my heart.

Posted by: ChristianH at April 1, 2009 11:48 AM

So I was all excited, thinking maybe I'd actually start reading comments again, if they were going to be on topic.

Then I realized it's April 1. Damn. I hope I'm wrong, because I think currently (SOMETIMES) the comments just serve to alienate the like 95% of the readership that doesn't have time to read through every single thread to get every single joke. Then it gets pointless to read any of them. Oh well.

Posted by: Abbey Road at April 1, 2009 11:49 AM

I, for one, am disappointed.

Not that I believe you.

Posted by: Bucko at April 1, 2009 11:49 AM

hmmm... April Fools maybe?

Posted by: legib at April 1, 2009 11:49 AM

Am I the only one who suspects that this is an April Fools joke? Specifically, the moderating comments aspect. The rest of it all sounds like an actual Pajiba plan.

You know, usually, I'm completely slow on the uptake for that kind of thing--identifying an April Fools joke. So I could be entirely wrong, but something about the way this was written just doesn't ring true.

Anyway, the best thing is, I won't know for certain because either A) this comment will be deleted because it's not properly on topic, or B) it will not be posted (at least not right away), so as not to alert others to the April Foolsness of the post itself.

Posted by: tamatha at April 1, 2009 11:50 AM

::sigh::

Posted by: Bucko at April 1, 2009 11:50 AM

Anna, I'm definitely not pro-censorship, either, but I think now that the announcement has been made most people who post here will be capable of "censoring" (so to speak) themselves. I just think it's good that someone in charge finally brought up the annoying, sexually starved elephant in the room. Now that the gauntlet has been thrown, I doubt too many comments other than obvious spam or ridiculously inoffensive/off-topic ones will be thrown out.

Just a technical question from a curious computer moron: how do you moderate comments? I mean, obviously you people have jobs and lives and someone can't be around 24/7 to read every comment and accept/reject it as it comes in. So is there some sort of software that does it, or will there just be long lag time between comment approval when someone isn't around to moderate? This is something I've always wondered just in general and I'm sure I could get an answer here.

Posted by: tinmo at April 1, 2009 11:50 AM

I don't know how to feel about the moderating. On the one hand, of course the hijacking can get a bit out of hand,... but rarely do the comments strike me as particularly mean spirited. My main concern I suppose would be with how it could effect the community of pajibans that is such a big part of this site. The comment threads often seem to be the main way in which people get to know each other, and the wittiest/funniest comments (aka the stuff that EE was made of) rarely seemed to be on topic. If the site had a forum or something within which people could shoot the shit, as it were, without intruding on the reviews, then there would be no possible downsides at all. Course Pajiba doesn't have a forum, and I don't know if you guys ever plan to create one.

With that said, who is going to be doing the moderating? Will it be all of you writers, or are you going to enlist people from other sources - perhaps even some of the commenters themselves who have proven their loyalty to the cause?

As for all the other announcements: sounds good, and I'm looking forward to a more frequently updated Pajiba, especially if it means finding out about more indie movies that I'd otherwise never hear about.

Posted by: rar at April 1, 2009 11:50 AM

Guess what day it is today?

Posted by: dugs at April 1, 2009 11:51 AM

it's censorship, which makes me cringey

I don't like it when people dictate what I can and can't see or say either, but for a private commercial venture such as this website, I would say it equates much more to the manner in which newspapers moderate their editorial pages -- not every letter can be passed on, but holding the large majority of them back doesn't equate to censorship. The form of "censorship" we're talking about occurs every day, on every television station, in every newspaper, in most forums where people speak. Without censorship, there is just a fog of unadulterated information, misinformation, disinformation, and noise, which can render the good stuff useless.

Journalists and entertainers have discriminated among the voices they report or pass along for eons. When censorship is government-sponsored or monopoly-based to expunge a certain viewpoint, that's dangerous. When a private entrepreneur picks and chooses what he will re-publish with his own resources, it's hard to quibble.

Posted by: rikkitikkitavi at April 1, 2009 11:52 AM

Ummm....April Fool's? I mean, there's serious stuff here, too, but is anyone REALLY going to moderate all this?

Quick, someone make an inappropriate sexual comment and see what happens!

Posted by: idgiepug at April 1, 2009 11:52 AM

g u e s s w h a t d a y i t i s t o d a y ?

Posted by: dugs at April 1, 2009 11:52 AM

You people are SHEEP! BAAA BAAAA BAAAAAAA

Posted by: Bucko at April 1, 2009 11:52 AM

Um, April Fool's?

Posted by: Dangle McGee at April 1, 2009 11:53 AM

OK, I'll stop trying to break your joke now. I can't believe all these people buying it.

Posted by: Bucko at April 1, 2009 11:53 AM

april fools?

Posted by: Suki at April 1, 2009 11:54 AM

Oh wait, this isn't an April Fool is it?

Just checking, you never know.

Posted by: Carrie at April 1, 2009 11:54 AM

Oh, and I forgot to add, Hooray! for more reviews and for Messrs. Britt and Wilson & Ms. Carlson.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I'll be wailing and rending my garments with Ms. Twig over there in the corner.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at April 1, 2009 11:54 AM

I don't know. I kind of think I'm here partly for the off-topic comments (reading them, not making them). But I guess I can see your point. Perhaps a compromise? A once-weekly non-moderated comment post, anything goes. I'd hate to see Pajiba become too civilized.

Posted by: Dudleys Mom at April 1, 2009 11:54 AM

Thank you. I've been reading Pajiba for several years and have thoroughly enjoyed the reviews and industry news (and I love Pajiba Love). But I have never commented before, because...yikes, what a mess the comment section had become. Sort of like a train wreck, sometimes I couldn't tear my eyes away. I look forward to more focussed discussions of media on the site and perhaps I will even contribute.

Posted by: Michellers at April 1, 2009 11:57 AM

Um April Fools?

Posted by: vdo86 at April 1, 2009 11:57 AM

I see your points, but I'd be able to take this without the level of speculation I am experiencing if this was any day other than April 1st.

Posted by: krix at April 1, 2009 11:58 AM

I have a bad feeling this is an April Fool's joke... but I wish it wasn't

Posted by: dg at April 1, 2009 11:58 AM

April Fool's?

I don't even post, but reading the comments (which can be way long) is still 50% of why I read this site. The other 50% is, of course, the content.

Posted by: Athena at April 1, 2009 11:59 AM

I can't believe you people are for this.

Posted by: Bucko at April 1, 2009 11:59 AM

ChristianH, yeah, but READ AlabamaPink's comments. Even when she was wildly divergent, she managed to keep it in the spirit of the column. We're not going to moderate EVERYTHING. Just the lame shit that has nothing to do with the column. And the grammar nazis. And Jay.

I pushed for this the hardest and the retirement of the EEs. The site became less about what drew me here in the first place -- interesting conversations about films and television. It became more about who can make the funniest dick and fart joke and then fourteen back and forth sex-chats like a highschool relationship. That's all cute that you've got a internet boyfriend, but seriously, take that shit to your bunk. That's why God created Facebook. So you can stalk twelve year old Miley Cyrus fans and leave them bloody and battered in a shallow grave beside the turnpike. Is it worse that I assumed it'd be a boy?

SXSW opened my eyes. We're starting to get recognized and respected by the rest of the internet columnists. It's about time we handled ourselves with some accord.

Posted by: insertclevernamehere at April 1, 2009 12:00 PM

My spirit is broken.

Posted by: Bucko at April 1, 2009 12:01 PM

"It seems like some people come here to use the comments as their personal "stage"

Uh, this is the Internet. That's pretty much what it's for."

Maybe that's why it's so annoying to me, then. I find many personal blogs annoying for the same reason; people trying to make their lives sound more interesting/quirky/exciting than they are to get attention they don't get in real life. But that's a psychology paper for another day....

As someone mentioned about AlabamaPink and what we may or may not have known about her due to her being able to freely comment, I don't think TPTB are going to be total Nazis about this and cut every little comment that veers even slightly to left of topic (correct me if I'm wrong, PTB). Obviously a little personal sharing is welcome and interesting, to a point. I think most regular commenters here are intelligent enough to know when they've crossed a line.

Posted by: tinmo at April 1, 2009 12:01 PM

Seems like an

APRIL FOOLS!

to me.

I sure hope so, anyway...

Posted by: AmandaPants at April 1, 2009 12:01 PM

Add another mostly-lurker to the chorus of "ayes." The reviews get pretty boring when the comments turn into a contest of who can launch the snappiest vulgar one-liner. It might be funny the first or second time, but it's the same old crap that happened the day before, so it's just boring.

Posted by: exoskeleton at April 1, 2009 12:01 PM

Fuck....

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at April 1, 2009 12:01 PM

Is this the April 1 joke? Because if it is, it's going to make me sad because I would like to see more on-topic discussion.

Posted by: courtney 2 at April 1, 2009 12:03 PM

I can't help but wonder if today's date has anything to do with this post...

I do miss the days of self-moderated comments. The group of regular commenters was smaller then, and it was a generally accepted rule of the site that the serious articles only got serious on-topic comments, and all the sexual banter and wackiness and other general off-topicness was reserved for things like Pajiba Love and Seriously Random Lists. But it seems like actual overlord moderation kinda goes against the spirit of the site. You don't have a community if the community can't speak to each other. I'd like it if reviews were treated with more respect, but I hope this moderating is just an April Fool's joke.

Posted by: Bistro at April 1, 2009 12:03 PM

Hmmm... Am I the only one that feels that maybe "moderating comments" is this year's Defining Movie of Our Generation? Just a thought...
I generally lurk and don't comment much, partially because I feel like you have to be a balls-to-the-wall commenter, putting your two cents in on every review and I don't have the attention span for that. But it doesn't seem like it would be Pajiba without the regular commenters doing their thing, and I think Dustin and the other PTB know that...

Posted by: christine at April 1, 2009 12:03 PM

Off-topic comments will never see the light of day. Comments of a sexual nature: Delete. Hijacking threads: Delete. In fact, when someone decides to start railing on one of the staffers here: Fuck it. Delete. It’s our fucking site. We don’t have to deal with the bullshit anymore. It’s time to make the conversation a little more civil, a little more on-topic, and a little less hostile towards your “overlords.”

Have we all forgotten what day it is? You're funny.

Posted by: Sharon at April 1, 2009 12:04 PM

April's fool?

Posted by: Sofía at April 1, 2009 12:05 PM

Seriously?

Posted by: christine at April 1, 2009 12:05 PM

In light of the new commie regime, SoD, I believe that you meant to say, "Oh boogers".

Posted by: slower lower at April 1, 2009 12:06 PM

Whoa, whoa! Backing away slowly, hands in the air.

I realize these points, rikkitikkitavi and tinmo, and I also realize that this is a knee-jerk reaction I have every time something remotely like this comes up. It's why I tempered my "declaration" with the caveats I did.

Of course, it's Dustin's site, and he can certainly do as he chooses with it. There are also the Facebook page and other people's blogs available to deteriorate into the cesspool that the comment threads sometimes do, rather than taking up the space here.

It's just that I feel a little icky about it, deep in my gut, which is what I was expressing.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at April 1, 2009 12:06 PM

I assume this change has more to do with today's date than reality.

Posted by: soulfusion at April 1, 2009 12:06 PM

I'm fine with moderation. I don't mind the occasional off-topic comment, but when it turns into a circle jerk, that's tiresome in the extreme and I stop reading. Also, on the Intertubes, those that pay for the bandwidth get to make the rules. Don't like it? Go somewhere else. Make your own website.

Maybe you'd get less of this if you'd stop referring to people as "Eloquents," which seems to give them the impression that their every thought is worthy of display. Just sayin'.

Posted by: Slash at April 1, 2009 12:06 PM

If I were you Dustin, I would do the exact same thing. In fact, I do on my own site even though there is no nearly the amount of comment traffic there as is here. Many times I come home at the end of the day and find that many reviews have already been diverted, so I don't bother to comment. And it is too time-consuming to post comments during the day using my iPhone like I am right now (I have no office, I'm always on the road). So I am looking forward to less diversions in the reviews. That said, I do hope you'll keep the comment diversion threads. Those are always good for a laugh.

Posted by: stardust savant at April 1, 2009 12:07 PM

I'm not so sure. On the one hand, I'm all for deleting the (not phony) spambot comments, but how far will this go? The best things about the internet are also the worst things, and moderating comments is one of those things. However, it can get really, really out of hand.

Take this scenario. You're dissing on Star Wars again, and I comment on how much you suck. You get angry, and then delete my comment. Pretty soon, you delete any commenter that disagrees with you, thus alienating your fans. Eventually, Pajiba either becomes something totally different, or no one will come visit here.

Why don't we compromise, how about you add one of those approval/ disapproval features onto the comments. That way, if a comment gets hit too far below by the readers, it will go away. Thus killing spambots, and people who get too out of hand, yet maintaining the freedom of the posts.

And you can't really use the I Love You, Man review as a good example. That thing was up there all weekend without a new post or a comment diversion. All posts like that meet that fate. Besides, people got friends on this site, and we like to shoot the breeze with friends.

Could you at least add more comment diversions to give the friends some way to communicate with each other? If you follow none of the other things I've suggested, at least do that.

Posted by: George at April 1, 2009 12:07 PM

A yay here for the new standards. I just hope the same can get implimented from the top-down, because that whole 'DSL' post a few weeks ago has still left me a little grossed out. Don't put garbage out and not expect to have animals digging through it.

Posted by: Kelly at April 1, 2009 12:07 PM

Pull the other one.

Posted by: Jay at April 1, 2009 12:07 PM

Well, since I've been specifically singled out for opprobrium (along with Pookie), even though a vast number of EEs carry on with the "flirting" and which stars they'd like to bang, etc., I must respectfully point out (again) that I offered a compromise that I thought had been accepted, and that I thought worked just fine the one time you tried it. And if you look back, I don't think I've jacked many threads on weekdays. It's on weekends, when there haven't been any new posts for 24 hours but I still feel like hanging with my friends here that I try to get something going. I didn't realize it was such a huge problem for you, though I realize you've tolerated a lot (and I've been responsible for some of that), but you know what? When you've asked us to reign it in, we have. When you said, "My family's off limits," we never went there again, did we? (At least not that I saw.) I can't speak for anyone else, but if you had asked me directly to tone it down I'd probably have bitched a little, but I would have, because I don't want to get kicked out of here (I don't take hints well, sorry, I'm kinda thick that way).

In all seriousness, Dustin, I respect your position, and if you think there are legal issues involved obviously you do what you have to do to protect the integrity of your site. But dammit, often there's only so much you can SAY about the 37th stupid rom-com of the month, and so threads get spun off on tangents, if not outright jacked, because, frankly, talking the same talk about the same old same old gets ... old. My idea of hell would be getting trapped in a roomful of people who ONLY talk about one subject, over and over and over.

I know it's not your fault that the vast majority of movies suck, and that there are only so many ways to say "This movie sucks," though your reviewers try mightily to find new ones. But it's not my fault the vast majority of movies suck either, and that the people here aren't going to bother with 99 percent of them, and so why talk about them? Can't we talk about something else?

I like it here, I think I've made one or two friends I wouldn't otherwise, and a big part of the reason is because we can talk about anything. Sometimes we talk about movies (and I DID note that I had seen "I Love You, Man" and that I liked it, and that I went because of the review) and sometimes we don't, sometimes we scan the offerings and decide there's nothing to add. So if your preference is to say, "Well, then, if you can't say something good don't say anything at all," and bum-rush us ... hey, it's your site. Anybody knows of someplace else we can go, please post it, and we won't sully this site with our ramblings and musings.

Though I will still be watching from time to time to see what rates as acceptable to the moderators. That should be interesting.

I love you, man.

Posted by: bucdaddy at April 1, 2009 12:08 PM

I am opposed to censorship but, as one of the moderators on a music site's messageboard community, it's easy for me to understand this decision and see it not as some fascistic attempt to muzzle free speech but as a reasonable attempt to bring civility to the comments. It had come to the point that I seldom read past the last sentence of any given review or news item because I knew that the comments were going to be dominated by Pookie, Barbado Slim, et al and that any comment relating to the topic would be buried in an avalanche of tired snarkiness between a few Eloquents who seemed to care less about the review and more about promoting themselves. To those who decry the decision to moderate comments here: Start your own blog.

Posted by: Spender at April 1, 2009 12:08 PM

'Bout fucking time!!!

Posted by: Sofía at April 1, 2009 12:08 PM

In the immortal words of Phillip J. Fry:

"I'll be whatever I wanna do!!"

Posted by: AM at April 1, 2009 12:09 PM

I fully and completely support this approach. I trust y'all to not get all zero-tolerance-draconian-marauder on our collective and impressive ass.

Posted by: firedmyass at April 1, 2009 12:10 PM

I've been scared to write anything since everytime I write crap I feel like I'm going to get screamed at by the regulars. Plus, there's nothing I can add when y'all are talking about doing it with pandas and such. It's probably not going to change much. Dustin'll get bored and then it'll be back to humping and drinking. So enjoy it while it lasts, y'all.

Posted by: Ann Ominous at April 1, 2009 12:10 PM

Also, to amend my previous "April Fool's" question.

I totally fell for it, got sad, went to my "my yahoo" page and saw another websites headline about falling for internet April fool's jokes, put it together with Jezebel shutting off comments too and there you go.

It's no Sister Act, but it'll do.

Posted by: Athena at April 1, 2009 12:10 PM

As someone mentioned about AlabamaPink and what we may or may not have known about her due to her being able to freely comment, I don't think TPTB are going to be total Nazis about this

I quote the last paragraph of the post:

"And we're going to be fucking facists about it."

To me, this whole thing smacks of bitterness and self-absorbtion. Yeah, try to steer comment conversations back on track. I've done it. It can work. But don't censor. You're just asking for a bland website then.

Posted by: ChristianH at April 1, 2009 12:11 PM

... and listen, I do appreciate the discussions that this site fosters, but this is also the site that had that beautiful "DSL" column what, a week ago? Two? So there's a bit of reaping and sowing going on here.

Posted by: twig at April 1, 2009 12:12 PM

Yanno, I can't say as I'm generally one to embrace change, until it's forced upon me, but I can definitely see how this particular change will be for the good of the site and its future growth.

So, despite my misgivings about moderation, I'm for it. I'm confident that we Eloquents can still have a good time, enjoy the sense of community that we come here for (or at least, I do), and manage to behave ourselves.

And like Prisco said, that's why they invented Facebook.

Posted by: lizzieborden at April 1, 2009 12:12 PM

April Fools joke? I had to ask, just in case.

If not, and if you guys are really considering this, it could be good to moderate. It isn't going to be the Bush administration (that comment called up a terrifying mental image of the Godtopus torturing poor, hapless Eloquents). I think moderation would probably make the site more welcoming for newer folks and for those of us who mostly lurk. It is sad to watch a great review get completely hijacked in the comments. That said, some of those threads were awfully, shall we say, entertaining.

But, as you say, it is your site.

Posted by: melligans at April 1, 2009 12:12 PM

Also: since we're using censorship I suggest putting a pair of pants on Godtopus.

Posted by: Sofía at April 1, 2009 12:12 PM

Thank Godtopus. I knew I couldn't break my addiction on my own. Tough love and cold turkey.

Guess I won't be seeing you freaks at the Philly Bacon. By June, I'll have forgotten all about you deviants.

WooHOO, FREEDOM!

Posted by: Lainey at April 1, 2009 12:12 PM

Oh god, I hope you agree to post that comment I wrote. It sucks having your post held captive by the Internet judges.

Just remember Dustin, you agreed to make your living on the wild west hellscape that is the Internet. These problems can make or break you, and depending on the next action you take, the site could become the best out there, or a poor mans review site trapped in a limbo of quality between a Dave Mathew's fan site, and Perez Hilton's blog.

I hope you make the right decision.

Posted by: George at April 1, 2009 12:13 PM

Oh god, I hope you agree to post that comment I wrote. It sucks having your post held captive by the Internet judges.

Just remember Dustin, you agreed to make your living on the wild west hellscape that is the Internet. These problems can make or break you, and depending on the next action you take, the site could become the best out there, or a poor mans review site trapped in a limbo of quality between a Dave Mathew's fan site, and Perez Hilton's blog.

I hope you make the right decision.

Posted by: George at April 1, 2009 12:13 PM

April Fools????

Posted by: Patti at April 1, 2009 12:15 PM

Well... I guess it had to be done. And in the end, I suppose it's for the better - we had some good times though. Some real good times...

[...fade in with some twinkly piano somethingorother as I throw my knapsack over my shoulder - zoom out to reveal lonely stretch of highway - as music crescendos, Wendel throws out his claw, misshapen thumb-up in the ages-old gesture of of one (or in this case, two) needing a ride to place yet unknown...]

Posted by: Skitz at April 1, 2009 12:16 PM

I'm with rikki, and not just because he's a witty mongoose.

De-lurking to say that there's nothing fascist about cutting down on the babel. I want to read Paddy's take on a Jane Austen adaptation on this particluar site, but unfortunately that kind of thing has been getting uptaged by "who's got the bigger boobs?" contests (someone above said something about desperation...maybe not that, because Paj readers are too sassy to be desperate, but it sure is wailing for validation of some kind).

The netz won't be no fun if EVERY site looks and feels like Facebook or Twitter. If the overlords have to weed-whack a bit to retain some kind of unique character, this radically anti-censorship reader does't have much of a problem with that, because my anti-homogeneity streak is just as wide.

Posted by: Metaphorika at April 1, 2009 12:16 PM

Rowles I can live by your rules, hell, I can even embrace them. This is your baby and you created it, so if we want to participate we must follow your rules, it’s all good. But you might want to rethink the “Not being able to rail against a staffer” rule, if a staffer makes a certain comment about a movie that we or I disagree with, I or we should be able to question that staffer’s sanity respectfully without our comment being deleted. As far as all your other rules go, I can live with those.


P.S. Fuck you back Ted, you piece of shit! And tell your mother next time I’ll have the full amount.

Posted by: Pookie at April 1, 2009 12:17 PM

Count me in as one of the ones who likes the idea of more reviews but is concerned about the blow to the community that moderated comments could have.

As someone who's still fairly new here myself, I say to the hesitant noobies: Make a comment! Make three! The people who leave comments here are really pretty darn welcoming. Is everyone else off topic? Make an interesting, relevant, provacative comment and bring it back on.

Off topic? Yes, frequently. Offensive? Obviously to some. But having come from an "everything goes" forum that was truly clique-y and often got really mean, this place downright warms my heart.

Posted by: frumpiefox at April 1, 2009 12:17 PM

Wait. WTF!? I miss Pajibacon cause I have a fucking JOB and I get cut out of weighing in on a major decision? Jesus Dustin. How drunk was everybody to not fight you on this? I am SHOCKED more people aren't pissed off about this. Fuck, now I'm late for work. Again.

Posted by: Beckylooo at April 1, 2009 12:17 PM

Ok, NOW you've jumped the shark.

Consider this my resignation.

Posted by: boo at April 1, 2009 12:20 PM

Like a few others, I'm a bit torn.

I think it's a very good idea to get more reviews on the site and add an air of classiness to the place, but I also really like the comments. I'd been coming to this site for years before I ever commented on anything. I only started doing so after I got to know the community a little bit. Commenting has, to me, become a part of Pajiba as much as the scathing reviews.

At the same time, I wouldn't want this place to end up like AICN with all the fanboys and "FIRST!!11 SuXXorzzs" comments.

Posted by: annoyingmouse at April 1, 2009 12:20 PM

This has got to be an april fool's joke, so I suspect that my comment won't even get up there. But i was JUST talking to someone about 4/1 pranks, and now here is this one. Kudos Dustin. I love this place.

Posted by: mswas at April 1, 2009 12:21 PM

Delurking to say that it would be funny if this were an April Fool's joke, only for the editors to find the vast majority of people would prefer it this way. Then what?

Posted by: CDell at April 1, 2009 12:21 PM

Thanks for this. I come here for excellent pop culture commentary. I sometimes post, but not as often as I'd like, because it feels like someone's private social club. And it feels weird commenting on the review when the previous 20 comments are about something completely unrelated.

Posted by: Sarah at April 1, 2009 12:21 PM

I stopped commenting about three years ago, and stopped reading the comments about two and a half years ago, because it became a huge waste of time. It's exciting to think that the comments will now be relevant to the topics of the posts. Thanks!

Posted by: Imprimis at April 1, 2009 12:22 PM

Hmmm... This could be interesting. Firstly, the censorship is a moot point. This is not a public street, this is Dustin (and company's) house and freedom of speech does not apply. If you're being an asshole in my house I'm gonna kick you out too.

Secondly (is that a word?), I'm terrified that this will chase away good people like 'Bama, but I sincerely hope not.

Posted by: The_wakeful at April 1, 2009 12:22 PM

Whoa! WHOA!!!

What the fuck is going on here?

NOBODY RESIGNS!!!

Dustin, tell 'em...

Posted by: Trouble at April 1, 2009 12:22 PM

Geez, I can be a long-winded bastard when I'm up on my soapbox, but I just noticed the post below this one is titled "Your best bet is to stay away, motherfucker."

So are you going to moderate the post titles too, because somebody might wander in and find "motherfucker" offensive? And the posts themselves; are the reviewers going to continue to try to one-up each other on over-the-top ways to call a foul-smelling PoS a foul-smelling PoS?

Guess what I mean is, your site often encourages the kind of foul-mouthed ruckus you now claim to deplore. If you want to be taken seriously, maybe y'all need to clean up your own act, too.

But I hope to God you don't.

I love you, man.

Posted by: bucdaddy at April 1, 2009 12:22 PM

Hurray for staffing stuff and new reviews and happy SXSW fun time!

But Comment Moderation = April Fool's Joke.

Unless the folks around here really are my Middle School principal staff, like I've begun to expect.

Posted by: Kayanne at April 1, 2009 12:25 PM

I'm not normally one to ruin a joke, but if this is an April Fool's Day prank, it's fucking brilliant.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at April 1, 2009 12:25 PM

Actually annoyingmouse, to me the comments here have been getting more and more Fark. So I am allright with it.

Posted by: pendulum at April 1, 2009 12:25 PM

Is it april 1 already?

Posted by: caragwapa at April 1, 2009 12:26 PM

I dunno--I'm about a four-year regular here, and the comment section has scared me, every time. And while there's gotta be a finer balance between fun and seriousness, a part of me is pretty psyched to see the stage cleared-up a bit. Y'all were damn intimidating.

Posted by: Sapphiar at April 1, 2009 12:26 PM

You know what folks? It's less about freedom of speech or censorship, and more about respect.

We respect your right to express yourselves and be goofy and funny, and we even have avenues for you to do it.

In exchange, all we ask is that you show US a little respect.

Posted by: TK at April 1, 2009 12:27 PM

April Fool's? Maybe?

Posted by: DarthCorleone at April 1, 2009 12:27 PM

So how will we have conversations and witty back-and-forth if we have to wait to see if our comments/responses even show up? I just want to know the logistics.

But honestly? I always skimmed the comments anyways.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at April 1, 2009 12:27 PM

Consider this my resignation.

-boo

She'll be back in two days at most. I know. Trust me, you guys would have to do something even stupider than this in order for a mass abandonment to be any threat. And Dusitn, if you don't want another I Love You, Man scenario, give us some more comments diversions, especially on weekends. Like bucdaddy said, we can only write "that movie is ass" so many times before it feels hollow. Without a refresher, the value is lost.

Posted by: George at April 1, 2009 12:27 PM

What a strange day to post such news.

Posted by: Samanthrax at April 1, 2009 12:28 PM

I just keep thinking, "When is he gonna yell "April Fools!'"

Posted by: frumpiefox at April 1, 2009 12:28 PM

I don' think my last post was offensive at all, so why the delay?

Posted by: Pookie at April 1, 2009 12:28 PM

Hahaha. nice.

Posted by: caragwapa at April 1, 2009 12:29 PM

Actually, this seems like an awfully big serious change to be unveiling on April 1.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at April 1, 2009 12:30 PM

Looks like it's back to www.crewelwork.com for me. I'm afraid to post over there. Mix up your Elizabethan with your Jacobean and those bitches are all over you. Some good lesbian porn links in the forum, though, so it evens out.

Posted by: slower lower at April 1, 2009 12:31 PM

I'm not going to do anything drastic, like quit or boycott or anything ridiculous like that. I started writing about music here to pad my portfolio and my resume as I seek out a job in music journalism. It doesn't pay, it's not always pretty, but it is what it is.

That said, while I started writing and interacting for work reasons, I've grown to love this site and the people who comment on it. I feel like I've become, at least in a small respect, a part of the community. Admittedly, I've gone a bit off the deep end (I apologize for a week or two ago, when I started screaming about "snobbery". I was having a really, really awful day), and I know others have too, but I will never, ever accept that this site is anything but a community.

To follow an analogy that's been presented, if Dustin wants a house to himself, kick everyone else out. But if he wants people to participate, and read the material, he'll won't.

Posted by: ChristianH at April 1, 2009 12:32 PM

I'm all for it. I stumbled on this site a couple of years ago, and the reviews were (and are) brilliant. I don't agree with all of them, but they are always well written and well thought out. It will be nice to read comments about the actual review and/or movie in question.

Posted by: Codeman at April 1, 2009 12:32 PM

april fools ????

IF you moderate comments i for one wil stop visiting the site .
Not a big loss but hey its the principle .

Posted by: gilp at April 1, 2009 12:33 PM

I have no problem with comment moderation. I moderate at my own blog and I don't get even .005% of the traffic that Pajiba gets. For all of the reasons you mention it absolutely makes sense and may be a very nice improvement. Also, I'll never understand the idea that it's censorship. You're not preventing people from saying what they want. You're just preventing them from saying on the site that YOU OWN. Perfectly reasonable.

So, on the one hand, YAY for comment moderation.

On the other hand, while I love the whole, "scathing reviews for bitchy people" thing, both in concept and in practice, I haven't been as comfortable here as I once was, and it's not the Eloquents or other commentors. I agree with everything you said, but it came across as really hostile towards your readers. Am I imagining this? Is it an April Fool's thing? Is it supposed to be sarcastic or ironic and I'm just being oblivious? But seriously, for the last several weeks or month, I've felt like some of the posts (especially yours) were overly hostile towards some of your readers (especially Whedon fans, like me), or in this case, a lot of your readers.

I don't think I'm over-sensitive, and ultimately, I don't really care. But each time I get that feeling, I think that maybe today is the day I'll delete Pajiba from my reader.

And I'm not saying this because anybody gives a flying crap whether I read Pajiba or not, but because I imagine I'm not the only one who feels this way and turning off your readers seems like a less than ideal plan.

Just my 7 cents.

Posted by: JGirl at April 1, 2009 12:34 PM

Dustin, you motherfucker! 4-1-2009. I can't believe I wrote all that sentimental bullshit, and started panicking and losing sleep! There's no way you'll post this! I can't believe you got me and everybody else like that so easily! Fuck, you did this before! I know because of a glitch in your site!

You motherfucker! God I love ya.

Posted by: George at April 1, 2009 12:35 PM

TK, I wish he'd just said that to us like we're all reasonable adults, rather than imposing this policy on us. And you've read some of my reviews and the comments. And I've read yours. We both know that it can be harsh and stupid and frustrating as hell. But we don't stop writing. And let's face it, padding the number of comments makes it look like more people read your work.

Posted by: ChristianH at April 1, 2009 12:35 PM

Cause there's a thin line between clever and ... er ...

(See! I made a movie reference!)

Posted by: bucdaddy at April 1, 2009 12:35 PM

This has to be an April fools day joke, right Rowles? Because just last week you wrote a column about which actress had the best lips for sucking dick, and now you complain about threads being hijacked.

Posted by: Pookie at April 1, 2009 12:36 PM

I love this day.

Posted by: gelis at April 1, 2009 12:36 PM

As someone who absolutely adores this site but rarely comments (not wanting to be the uncool kid jumping in on an inside joke), I like this. I think.

Going out on a limb though--did that last paragraph reek just a little bit of April Fool's? Anyone? Just me? I mean, this isn't just provoking the wrath of a lot of Pajibans...boo just resigned. Is this for real?

Posted by: Adrienne at April 1, 2009 12:37 PM

Why censor?

Posted by: ton at April 1, 2009 12:38 PM

I'm taking this announcement with a grain of salt. It's April first and I've already played some of my office pranks, with more to follow.

Although I don't comment very often and my comments are pretty dull I dislike censorship on principle. I would hope that Pajiba would remember the Homeland Security incident and that censorship almost ended this site once before.

I like the fact that Pajiba is becoming a more recognized review site, however with a name like Pajiba; do you really think you’ll ever be taken completely serious?

Posted by: DoubleH at April 1, 2009 12:38 PM

Ah fuck, I just realized what day it is, and after I wrote a nice long comment about it. Assholes!

Posted by: The_wakeful at April 1, 2009 12:38 PM

Seeing so many people "excited" about the comment moderation makes me a little nervous. And sad.

Posted by: Kayanne at April 1, 2009 12:38 PM

um... wait a sec. It's April 1st.

may I ask if y'all are for reals here?

Posted by: lizzieborden at April 1, 2009 12:39 PM

Yeah, you know...I'm gonna sleep on this. G'night, folks. I'll see you tomorrow.

Maybe.

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at April 1, 2009 12:41 PM

I'd be okay with this, but I'm a little suspicious, and kind of surprised that no one else has pointed this out: remember Sister Act?

Posted by: jecca at April 1, 2009 12:41 PM

Please tell me this is an April Fool's joke.

I mean, yeah, sometimes the comments go off track, but a lot of times that's what I find so goddamn entertaining. I've even got a file labeled "Pajiba" where I copy and paste all the stuff that makes me laugh. Don't take that away from me.

This is a joke, right? Right? OH COME ON!

Posted by: DeadBessie at April 1, 2009 12:41 PM

I'm still trying to decide if this is an April Fool's gag (if so well played)(and I remember from last year that any comments calling it out as such aren't published until after the fact).

Posted by: largirl at April 1, 2009 12:42 PM

ok, i said this last year, but i'm going to say it again--this shit makes me dizzy. i think that the part of my brain that should process this kind of information is broken, so i just get confused and i can't figure out who is in on it and who is buying it. then i start wondering if maybe you're being serious and i'm just that slow. then i remember that you already moderate comments. then i start all over and end up dizzy.

Posted by: pq at April 1, 2009 12:42 PM

April Fools, right?

RIGHT?

Posted by: Rachel Coleman at April 1, 2009 12:42 PM

Where is Pookie, why isn’t he posting a comment or has Rowles and his censors not even allowing him to post?

Posted by: Pookie at April 1, 2009 12:43 PM

Since my first comment, which was like 23rd or 24th in the list, was held by the mighty Godtopus, I'm going to try this in code.

ook-lay at e-thay ate-day.

I don't think it's real. I won't believe it.

Posted by: idgiepug at April 1, 2009 12:43 PM

I think I could care less if you moderate or not as I'm generally a lurker.

Anyway, I'm going to reserve further comment until tomorrow since it's April 1st and this could be a strange sort of joke.

Posted by: Lainiefig at April 1, 2009 12:43 PM

This is because of today's date, right?

don't censor me, damnit!

Posted by: Rachel at April 1, 2009 12:44 PM

Beautiful, thought-out, well-written review...

Commenter 1: I still won't be seeing this. I just can't get over the gaping plot-holes in the last one. How is a sequel even possible, let alone necessary?

Commenter 2: I don't know if I'd call them "plot-holes" so much as unresolved conflicts. Either way, I'll be seeing it. I've not given up on the franchise.

Commenter 3: Ever since the atrocity he was involved with last year, I've personally decided to boycott any of his films until there's better writing.

Commenter 4: I concur.

Commenter 5: As do I, Commenter Four.

Commenter 4: Thank you, Commenter Five.

Commenter 1: Very well then.

Commenter 2: Yes, very well indeed.

Commenter 6: JESUS CHRIST, DON'T ANY OF YOU SEE WHAT'S GOING ON?! SOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE! PEOPLE! THEY'VE TAKEN OVER THE INTER...
a small, red dot centers on the forehead of Commenter Six. In an instant, the top half of Six's head disappears in a mist of blood, gristle & bone. Silence follows...

Commenter 2: Tsk, some people!

Commenter 1: Indeed...

Posted by: Skitz at April 1, 2009 12:44 PM

Hmmm. If this is real, it really shouldn't have been posted on April 1st.

Is ANYONE else the least bit hesitant to believe this? Because of the date? No?

Posted by: Tati at April 1, 2009 12:44 PM

I'm a little torn, much like AvB, because while I understand your legal and artistic license concerns, I think the editors here at Pajiba really encourage the overtly sexual and off-topic banter with articles like "Best Abs in Hollywood" and "Best DSL's." What EXACTLY do you expect your site and its comment boards to devolve into when the focus is no longer on scathing reviews for bitchy people? Are the readers supposed to stay on track when the quality of writing has changed from what originally brought us here (two or three insightful, irreverent, and funny reviews a day) to a bunch of filler pieces and picture galleries that primarily serve the purpose of inflating your hit totals for the day?

I don't mean to come off as a prick here, because I do truly love this site, but it seems a little disrespectful and alienating to your core audience when you write things like:

It’s our fucking site. We don’t have to deal with the bullshit anymore. It’s time to make the conversation a little more civil, a little more on-topic, and a little less hostile towards your “overlords.”

I mean, that's nice for you and all that you have your big, bad delete button and that you retain the ability to type the word "fuck" over and over, but don't forget that your readers also have the option of just steering their browsers elsewhere. And with language like that, I'm not so sure that you and the other "overlords" won't be left writing just for each other and walking around in your big kingdom wondering where your "subjects" have all gone.

So, in closing, I have no intentions of leaving for now, but let's see if you keep up with your end of the bargain with a better quality of writing, perhaps something reminiscent of what brought many of us here in the first place.

As for me, I don't have a problem posting on topic. I more than often do and would LOVE the option, as a film and TV buff myself, of actually discussing the movie being reviewed.

Posted by: The Pink Hulk at April 1, 2009 12:45 PM

Fair enough boss, your site, your rules. I for one first commented here what, a year ago, because of the Eloquents. I found that Pajiba had a personality that resonated with me both because of the reviews and due to comments afterwards.

I'll take part of the blame for the hijacks as I usually am involved in one way or another (I have no life I've dealt with that), I read all of the reviews and usually find them quite enjoyable. But, there are only so many ways to state that the latest Paris Hilton offering is a steaming pile of turd or that this movie could walk on water if it had feet.

I can respect that you want to take the site in a different direction then the one it's going in, and bravo to the new critic additions and more reviews. I just hope your pending facism is a little overstated.

Posted by: admin at April 1, 2009 12:47 PM

ummmm, April Fools?

Posted by: Tammy at April 1, 2009 12:49 PM

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you're all getting trolled, here. I mean, it is April 1st and all...

Posted by: phaedawg at April 1, 2009 12:49 PM

Last Saturday was my birthday and I had no idea of what had taken place on the I Love You, Man thread. Imagine my surprise when I read the comments and realize that somebody had linked a picture of me (without my permission) and exposed me to hundreds - if not thousands - of strangers. Not only that, but there was a lot of innuendo in the comments about other Pajibettes and myself.

I'm not OK with that.

I am, though, OK with my blog followers looking at pictures of me, because they idolize me too much and think I'm too awesome to hurt me, but I really don't know what kind of freaks I can bump into on this threads.

I'm 24 now and already on the wrong foot, with thusands of Internet stalkers and new facebook groups (devoted to that damn picture) showing up like mushrooms after the rain. And it rained hard, folks. It was a fucking sexual harrassment storm. Thanks a lot, assholes. I hope they censor your asses back to the Bush years. Happy birthday to me.

Posted by: Sofía at April 1, 2009 12:49 PM

I like the idea of letting the off-topic conversations flourish on posts like the Comment Diversions (some of the ones that call on readers to share personal stories have been AMAZING), and keeping the review threads focused on the, y'know, reviews.

The off-topic gabfests have become more and more sprawling -- when I first started reading Pajiba a few years ago, the review threads seemed to stay much more on-topic than now.

As entertaining as the Eloquents are, I think the way they take over almost every thread contributes to a feeling for lurkers and first-time readers that they are entering some sort of secret clubhouse. I get that for many Eloquents it's a great club and they don't want it moderated, but . . . if "secret clubhouse" isn't the atmosphere the Pajiban overlords' want for their site, tough noogie. It's their site.

It sounds like the overlords are taking care of their own (the writers and reviewers) -- I'm okay with that.

Posted by: Lizzie (greeneyed fem) at April 1, 2009 12:50 PM

Yikes. I feel like I just got yelled at by the principle, and at the end she called my mom. But the reason I was called in her office was for screaming 'FUCK!' in the hallway and writing dick jokes on the bathroom stalls.

I've been hanging around here for three years now, and I understand completely your reasoning. Shit does get really messed up and off topic. All the randomness should be saved for Random Lists and Comment Diversions. Do what you need to, I'm for whatever you think is best. You are the granddaddy of Pajiba, after all.

Posted by: Jaci at April 1, 2009 12:50 PM

So does everyone get the "held for review" screen?

Posted by: admin at April 1, 2009 12:50 PM

Respect you say, TK? Rowles wrote a column a couple of days ago about which actress had the best lips for sucking dick. And now he comes here like his shit don’t stink, and wanting to censor posts like his hands are clean. Last time I checked his motto was “Scathing reviews for bitchy people” and now he’s offended by harsh words? Tell Rowles to grow a pair. I don’t expect this to get posted, but I want the censors at the gate to read it carefully.

Posted by: ton at April 1, 2009 12:51 PM

Better, beautiful, thought-out, well-written review...

Commenter 1: I still won't be seeing this. I just can't get over the gaping plot-holes in the last one. How is a sequel even possible, let alone necessary?

Commenter 2: I don't know if I'd call them "plot-holes" so much as unresolved conflicts. Either way, I'll be seeing it. I've not given up on the franchise.

Commenter 3: [something dirty about what to stick in the Plot Holes]

Posted by: Bucko at April 1, 2009 12:52 PM

Like the man said, it's their site. I don't watch a lot of movies simply because grad school owns my soul, but when I do, I come here to read the review. I like the music section. I like the books section. I like you people, most of you anyways.

That being said, I don't get to comment during the day unless I have my personal laptop with me, so do what you will.

Also, it's 4-1 right?

Posted by: Melody at April 1, 2009 12:52 PM

Ummm.

Maybe I am being paranoid here, but-- has no one noticed today's DATE?

Is it possible that has a place in any of this? Because I kinda find this dramatic new strategy unbelievable.

Posted by: Brenda at April 1, 2009 12:52 PM

Cant you just create a forum?

Posted by: Matthew655321 at April 1, 2009 12:52 PM

I HATE this fucking holiday.

Posted by: Ciji at April 1, 2009 12:53 PM

As another person who's been around these parts for awhile, I also welcome this change (assuming it's real?). I used to comment frequently but stopped because I had no desire to join the crude-themed hijinks going on. Not that there's anything wrong with dick, fart, and boob jokes, it just seemed like an inappropriate forum. And frankly, in my increasingly hectic life, I had no time for it. It grew tiresome to finally get a chance to settle down with some Pajiba at the end of the day and see hundreds of comments on a review, knowing full well they had nothing to do with the original topic. And some may say you can still post on-topic after the meaningless banter has started, but all relevancy is lost by that point. Eventually I found myself skimming the comments, and then avoiding them all together. But then a funny thing happened. I started focusing on the reviews again, and remembered why I stuck around this place to begin with. Such talented writers who share my point of view on pop culture. What a concept! I think I would have left this site all together if I had rediscovered that.

At this point in the game I trust the staff to make good decisions based on their personalities that have been revealed to us over the years. I think their comment moderating will be fair and productive. They still have the same witty and bitchy senses of humor they always have. Just make sure to keep up with the Boozehound reviews so we have a place to discuss what a bunch of lushes some of us like to be.

George, if you're bored on weekends go to the Facebook page. It's made for such meaningless chit chat.

Posted by: katy at April 1, 2009 12:53 PM

Other sites like GoFug and recently Jezebel have completely done away with comments because of the same behavior that bothers Dustin. At least he recognizes the community that does exist here and how integral it is to the success of the site, and didn't disable comments altogether. The idea of censorship is slightly off-putting I agree, but I can at least respect the philosophy behind why Dustin made the decision, and it won't keep me from coming back to Pajiba. Just provide comment diversions and open threads for the "eloquent" shenanigans to continue while maintaining the integrity of the review threads. It seems reasonable to try.

Posted by: MG at April 1, 2009 12:55 PM

Don't make Dustin angry. You wouldn't like him when he's angry.

All your comment are belong to us.

/stale joke

Posted by: Sean at April 1, 2009 12:56 PM

Rock on Dustin. Some questions:
Will you be taking turns monitoring the comments or does everyone have to monitor the comments on their own posts?
Will you be publishing guidelines?
How about the minutes of your SXSW meeting? Sorry, habit, too many conference calls today.
Have you been opening the random weekend thread of recent (haven't noticed)? Maybe open something like that once a week to provide the forum for people to get a bit off topic.

Posted by: Brian at April 1, 2009 12:56 PM

Is this an april fools joke?

Posted by: Jack Hass at April 1, 2009 12:56 PM

I hate this fucking holiday.

Posted by: Ciji at April 1, 2009 12:57 PM

Hrmmm...

A bold proclomation.
Perfectly succicint and well thought out.
Really, it's about time.
It had to come to this.
Let's just move on and emrbace the new Pajiba.

Feelings need to be expressed.
Obviously this will be a tough pill to swallow.
On the other hand, it needed to be done.
Looking forward to the new era.
Same as it ever was, I suppose.

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at April 1, 2009 12:57 PM

You clever Pajiba Overlords. An April Fool's post that is legitimate enough to be real. Well done. I think.

Posted by: TylerDFC at April 1, 2009 12:57 PM

So...it boils down to "we're being noticed by other blogs, and we're important, and you're not" right? I mean: that's the gist? You could have just put it like that. Nothing would suck the fun and communal sense out of the comments if you just put it to us like you think it.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at April 1, 2009 12:58 PM

This is a much better April fools joke than the previous ones. It's plausible.

Posted by: anikitty at April 1, 2009 12:59 PM

Hey whatever floats your boat, sweetheart, however don't try to come and lay all the blame on us for SOMETHING *YOU* PROMOTED, with glee. That means you Rowles. You have referred to the "saucy ladies of Pajiba* (or words to that effect)more than once. Oh and there's no doubt in my mind who's promoting this little, conversion. Right, lard boy?

So take at least some of the responsibility for the monster you created. Take the holier than thou attitude and cram it up your.... Pajiba.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 1, 2009 1:00 PM

Like always, you fucking Henny Pennies, we tell you we're getting a haircut, and you assume we're shaving the whole head.

There's a world of fucking difference between a comment section turning into a fight about Star Trek vs. Star Wars because Patrick Stewart was mentioned in a review, and the comment section turning into a therapy session for, say, Kayanne needing advice and encouragement about whether high heels make her sexy.

The Dick Sucking Lips was mocking Dustin and his Best Abs post. That's why Seth wrote it. Because we were giving Dustin shit about making the random lists all about sexuality. My next random list was going to be Five Celebrities I Want to Get Handjobs From. Because it's random. Those are the places to go apeshit. Not in the reviews.

Freaking out like this. You people should know better.

Posted by: insertclevernamehere at April 1, 2009 1:00 PM

Also, for the record: bullshit.

April 1st, nimrods. I mean, seriously. I respect the intelligence and the wit of everyone who comments here regularly, but there's no way that the dissertations above are just cleverly in on the joke. boo, sofia, the writers and a few more are being witty, I assume, but the rest of you: snowed like Canada. Maybe it's just from having been around here for a few years now, but I still can't believe how many people fall for this every year. Bravo, Overlords. Bravo indeed.

Posted by: Sean at April 1, 2009 1:01 PM

Does the fascist part of this post have anything to do with the date being April 1st? I'm just saying... wouldn't be the first time you guys pulled that kind of trick.

Posted by: buttercup at April 1, 2009 1:01 PM

*sigh*

Say it with me, people: "Pajiba is not a public space. It's not censorship to moderate comments. I can still say whatever I want, I just can't say it in Dustin's house."

Now, repeat until it sinks in.

Thanks.

Posted by: JGirl at April 1, 2009 1:02 PM

I'm as guilty as anybody else as far as getting off topic, but I completely respect the decisions of our Pajiban Overlords, and intend to abide by them. This site is my drug of choice, the thing that sometimes gets me thru another tedious day at work, night with arguing teenagers, or boring-ass weekend. It's the place where we can talk about movies, books, tv shows, etc. that we love or hate. Its also a family, as we all really found out last week. I love you goofy people, and I will abide by family rules, so I can stay in the family.

"Families are like fudge... mostly sweet with a few nuts."

Posted by: dammitjanet at April 1, 2009 1:02 PM

I'm not sure if this is an April Fools' thing or not, but I honestly hope you're for real.

This site has some of the best reviews on the internet, especially Dan's, but I don't want to direct people here because a lot of the comments are reminiscent of what you would find at AICN, and that's just embarrassing. This place isn't what it used to be.


Posted by: misty at April 1, 2009 1:02 PM

April Fool's?

Posted by: Steve at April 1, 2009 1:03 PM

This may be the least off-topic thread ever, so I guess it's working.

Posted by: frumpiefox at April 1, 2009 1:03 PM

I completely respect all the review and contributing writers we have here, and I respect that it's your site and your rules. I am feeling though, like these particular rules may go too far. While there are certainly some inappropriate comments (including my own) and I can see getting rid of completely offensive stuff, the "off-topic" is part of what makes Pajiba such a wonderful place. As we've all seen over the past week or so, this place has become a sort of internet family. Some of the wonderful coming together wouldn't have happened without the off-topic-ness of Pajiba. And certainly it keeps things interesting. Sure, we may have a dirty Uncle Pookie or Cousin Bucdaddy who can get a little out of hand at times - but who doesn't? Maybe set forth some rules and see if we all can't get along before putting us all on lockdown?

It seems like your minds are made up, but perhaps a little behaviour modification could do wonders? Regardless, I promise to be in my bunk at lights out.

Posted by: Cindy at April 1, 2009 1:04 PM

APRIL FOOLS!!!


Right?


...please?

Posted by: Clee Shay at April 1, 2009 1:06 PM

Is this an April Fool's joke? I'm a little suspicious because, well, it is April 1st and this is a volatile subject. Hmmmm.

Posted by: tbean at April 1, 2009 1:06 PM

And another site I like goes by the wayside. I'll still stop by occasionally, because the reviews are quality, but I personally believe Godtopus cries a little every time a post is deleted. And Sophia, I believe you'd need four pairs of pants for big G.

Posted by: Mrcreosote at April 1, 2009 1:06 PM

As a lurker who never comments, but who was just reminded by an ultrasound picture on my definitely-not-pregnant sister-in-law's blog -

It is April Fools Day.

Just sayin'.

Posted by: randomlurker at April 1, 2009 1:07 PM

So...

... I'm the only one whose first thought was that it's April 1st?

Posted by: Megan at April 1, 2009 1:07 PM

Perhaps we should consider what day it is...

Posted by: Clee Shay at April 1, 2009 1:07 PM

Has no one realized today's date yet? Jesus Christ already.

Posted by: Patrick C at April 1, 2009 1:07 PM

April Fools?

Posted by: captaino at April 1, 2009 1:08 PM

Don't be mean, Prisco. I didn't need encouragement.

Posted by: Kayanne at April 1, 2009 1:08 PM

Hey Sofia:

Forgive me for butting in here but everytime you post here, you link yourself to your blog with that photo (you are not obliged to link your name to your blog). If you don't want it exposed to "thousands" of Web stalkers, take it off your blog: don't protest after the fact about "permissions". This is the Internet, it's the natural habitat of lonely boys, outcasts and obsessive personalities. Once the pic is up in the Webiverse, you have lost control.

Posted by: PaddyDog at April 1, 2009 1:10 PM

SXSW opened my eyes. We're starting to get recognized and respected by the rest of the internet columnists. It's about time we handled ourselves with some accord.

That right there is when I knew this was just an April Fool's prank. Because, come ON.

It IS sad to see how many people are all for the fascism, though. Sheesh. What is this, JEZEBEL? FIE! Next thing you know they'll be taking away our vowels! well, Katherine Heigl is fat and ugly! Body snarking! Personal problems! Arrr!

In exchange, all we ask is that you show US a little respect.

Oh, TK. No.

Posted by: figgy at April 1, 2009 1:10 PM

APRIL FOOLS!

Posted by: OldSchool60 at April 1, 2009 1:11 PM

Posted by: insertclevernamehere at April 1, 2009 1:00 PM


Hey someone who uses his site to list people whom he would like handjobs from needs to tone it down on the 'TUDE he has presented here. Basically telling us to fuck off 'cause we are ruining the site. maybe a little humility is in order and there's a way to act and ask, politely.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 1, 2009 1:11 PM

As much as I'm all with you on the moderation, Sofia, I have a hard time feeling sorry for the exploitation of a picture that you POSTED ON THE INTERNET. That shit is subject to whatever people want to make it subject to, sadly enough. That's why I disabled my facebook account. Too many people were looking at pictures that I didn't really want them to, but that's my own fault because I put it out there. As Dr. Phil would say, something about that is working for you or you wouldn't have done it. When you post something like that, you're risking bad attention to go along with the good. You have to decide whether the good attention is worth the bad. It's all about the facts of life you know...

And no, to stop people in their tracks, this is not the same thing as a woman with nice boobs walking around carrying on her daily life getting sexually harassed, and we all know that.

Posted by: tinmo at April 1, 2009 1:12 PM

Wow, it's like the sky is falling and the Pajiban commenters have SO MUCH to say about it. I don't recall seeing this much content in the comments section. I hope no one regrets having so much to say TOMORROW...you know, after TODAY...whatever today might be...

Posted by: randomlurker at April 1, 2009 1:12 PM

But you see, Cindy, it's not the wonderful place that is the comment section being noticed, it's the reporting.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at April 1, 2009 1:12 PM

COMMUNISTS.

Posted by: figgy at April 1, 2009 1:12 PM

Thank god.

Hope it works.

Give 'em a daily comment diversion and it should be fine.

And fuck that narcissistic dickhead Pookie. That's on topic, right?

Posted by: icecreammang at April 1, 2009 1:14 PM

I've got so much to say about all of this but I'm wondering will it get censored?

Posted by: Pookie at April 1, 2009 1:14 PM

I wonder how many April Fools comments are being "moderated" right now...

Posted by: randomlurker at April 1, 2009 1:15 PM

I'm curious to see if this comment pointing out how this is clearly an April Fools' joke is deleted...

Posted by: Macafee at April 1, 2009 1:15 PM

Oh, won't post my other comment, eeeh? I see how it is. I'm taking my ball and going home.

Posted by: figgy at April 1, 2009 1:16 PM

Fascinating... But there are just way too many comments here for me to feel like I can join in the discussion. I say all but the most interesting should be kept. Or maybe threaded commenting? Is that too fancy?

Posted by: Macafee at April 1, 2009 1:17 PM

Whyyy are you withholding my comment? It was sexually appropriate, on topic, wait--was I right about April Fool's? Hmm?

Posted by: Adrienne at April 1, 2009 1:17 PM

Moderated comments = Pajibans fighting.

Well, it worked, I guess.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at April 1, 2009 1:17 PM

Pajiba is not a public space.

Um, isn't a free website pretty much the definition of a public space? Let's find out, shall we?

Per Wikipedia:

"refers to an area or place that is open and accessible to all citizens, regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, age or socio-economic level. For example, no fees or paid tickets are required for entry, nor are the entrants discriminated based on background."

Now, since this is the case, then we can safely argue that Pajiba is not Dustin's house, but perhaps his office. Since an office building is privately owned, the owner of said building has the right to decide who he wants to let in the building, and whether he will let them hang fliers on the walls; however, when he chooses not to let someone in or not to hang their flier, then he is, effectively, censoring them. As I said earlier, it is a knee-jerk reaction problem that I have; however, you cannot argue that this doesn't at least smack of censorship.

Like always, you fucking Henny Pennies, we tell you we're getting a haircut, and you assume we're shaving the whole head.

Isn't your head already shaved?
P.S. I am not a Henny Penny! Merely a flagrant paranoid who sees censorship everywhere. There is a difference, sir.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at April 1, 2009 1:18 PM

In regards to moderating the comments section: I've been reading this site for about 4 years, and I've probably only commented about 4 times, but I found what you wrote to be rather off-putting. I don't really mind the idea of moderation, but was that condescending tone really necessary? It sounded just as self-involved and annoying as the comments you won't deign to post on your site anymore.

Posted by: prawntastic at April 1, 2009 1:18 PM

You know what?

Let me be a good little Pajiban:

Mr. Rowles is right, it's his property and we need to conform to his strict guidelines.

Keep on telling us how to behave properly sir, and keep up the great work.

*thumbs up*

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 1, 2009 1:19 PM

April Fool's?

Posted by: Se7en2 at April 1, 2009 1:19 PM

ForbiddenDonut you beat me to it. I was going to say:

All
Pajibans
rise!
I'll
lead.

Fickle
Overlords
offer
little
sympathy.

But you were much more elequent, as they say.

Posted by: tamatha at April 1, 2009 1:19 PM

Well, I for one would like to welcome our new moderator overlords. I've personally given up on trying to keep up with all the off-topic shenanigans around here. I'm too slow for that.

Posted by: Melissa at April 1, 2009 1:21 PM

I'll still stop by occasionally, because the reviews are quality,

Posted by: Mrcreosote at April 1, 2009 1:06 PM

That makes two of us, I don't have enough time in the day to be talked down to as if I were some punk.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 1, 2009 1:23 PM

As I suspected, there are more than a few "Eloquents" who are deciding to quit this place because they've been asked to conduct themselves as thinking adults rather than hyperactive attention seekers in need of validation. This site existed long before them and will thrive long after they've gone sulking down the road in search of new playgrounds and a fresh crop of youngsters whom they can bully. It will continue to thrive because there are enough people reading the good work of excellent writers who genuinely love sharing their take on films, books and music.
To those among you who are taking your ball and going home: You will be missed and I wish you much luck in finding a similar site that will provide the forum you so desperately need.

Posted by: Spender at April 1, 2009 1:25 PM

Okay, well I think my previous comment was moderated, which is okay because I would like to rescind it anyways.

I'll drink the kool aid, however, I might regret it later.

Posted by: DoubleH at April 1, 2009 1:25 PM

Pajiba moderating comments + Jezebel disabling all comments + April 1 =April Fools joke

Posted by: anoymous at April 1, 2009 1:25 PM

You know what would work even BETTER so that no one will be forced to *gasp* read 100 comments (because my GOD with my precious time why do I even have to bother?)? You should set a cap on the amount of comments a person can post. One post per person per story. And then, set a cap on the total amount of comments a post can have.

Then, if you want to comment, you only have to get through TWENTY comments instead of -oof- spending so much time reading through the nonsense.

Posted by: figgy at April 1, 2009 1:26 PM

Wait a sec, is it possible this is an April Fool's joke? Cause if so, totally working.

Posted by: zygomatique at April 1, 2009 1:26 PM

MG, I'm pretty sure the Jezebel comment-disabling is an April Fool's joke, just for today. At least I hope it is.

Wait, is THIS an April Fool's prank? I guess no one really thinks so -- prolly not.

Posted by: Lizzie (greeneyed fem) at April 1, 2009 1:27 PM

Just a lurker with nothing of value to add, but my only thought from reading this is that if I were going to institute new rules I probably wouldn't have announced them on April 1.

Posted by: sweetfeed at April 1, 2009 1:27 PM

I call april fools.

However, new content seems awesome. I did notice and appreciate the updated trade round ups.

Also, this years april fools is cooler then last years when everyone play hated everyone else.

Cool

Posted by: Theresa at April 1, 2009 1:27 PM

I'm noticing a distinct lack of comments from certain people around this here part? I wonder if the date has anything to do with this?

Posted by: admin at April 1, 2009 1:27 PM

Holy fuck people, we are some gullible dipshits.

Does anyone remember what day this is?

Posted by: Cindy at April 1, 2009 1:28 PM

Rowles, am I not allowed to defend myself from attacks such as the one perpetrated by icecreammang? Or am I to simply not say anything for fear that I might upset the delicate balance of these new laws you’ve laid before us?

P.S. Fuck you icecreammang! And tell your mother I’ll have the proper amount next time.

Posted by: Pookie at April 1, 2009 1:29 PM

Is it time for the dance number yet?


Open the gates and seize the day
Don't be afraid and don't delay
Nothing can break us no one can make us
Give our right away
Arise and seize the day

Now is the time to seize the day
(now is the time to seize the day)
Send out the call and join the fray
(send out the call and join the fray)

Wrongs will be righted
If were united
Let us seize the day

Friends of the friendless seize the day
(friends of the friendless seize the day)
Raise up the torch and light the way
(raise up the torch and light the way)

Proud and definate
We'll slay the giant
Let us seize the day

Neighbor to neighbor
Father to son
One for all and all for one

Open the gates and seize the day
(open the gates and seize the day)
Don't be afraid and don't delay
(don't be afraid and don't delay)

Nothing can break us
No one can make us
Give our rights away

Neighbor to neighbor
Father to son
One for all and all for one

Posted by: slower lower at April 1, 2009 1:30 PM

Forbiddendonut I'm not sure I agree. My reaction was:

All Pajibans rise! I'll lead. Fickle overlords offer little sympathy.

Posted by: tamatha at April 1, 2009 1:30 PM

Okay, just read all the little changes. I'm not really big on the whole censorship thing, but after going through the I Love You, Man thread for EE, I actually had to stop half way through. I'm sorry, but I mean, it was funny at first, but my God people, there's such a thing as too much. So yes, moderation isn't the absolute worst thing in the world, it won't kill you, and maybe it'll even convince more people to delurk. Thank you.

*Gets off the soapbox*

Posted by: Jeremy Feist at April 1, 2009 1:31 PM

Let's see if this comment gets through...

Very happy about the new reviews on indie films, and I noticed and appreciated the more frequent trade roundups. Very cool.

Posted by: Theresa at April 1, 2009 1:31 PM

I just want to see if I can sneak something by the moderators if I disguise it as an example of what NOT to post on the threads....like we shouldn't be saying things like "Hey boo, nice smile. May I wear your ass as a hat?" or "Midgets do vibrate, and if you can find the truly small ones, they'll fit in your pants."

or...sould we get away with comments like "Blah blah blah, nice review, i agree, Keanu is shit, Cage sucks dick, and I want Julie to sit on my face and wigggle." See...that's on topic with a potential review of a terrible Nic Cage/Keanu Reeves project, but laced with Julie riding my face right there at the end. That presents a quandry in and of itself.

...discuss.

Posted by: PissBoy at April 1, 2009 1:32 PM

Are you headcases so awed by the idea of moderation (hey Rowles - see how well it works on slashdot!) that you forget to check today's date??

Godtopus people, sometimes I don't know what to do with you. No moderation, no censorship!

Posted by: lordhelmet at April 1, 2009 1:34 PM

Um, so, maybe... April Fools?

Posted by: Fi at April 1, 2009 1:35 PM

Any of you sheep see the date today??

Posted by: lordhelmet at April 1, 2009 1:35 PM

Look, I understand everyone's a little upset/overjoyed, but can we take a moment to look at the real question at hand?

Can I finally shoot Conrad and burn his house down?

Posted by: Skitz at April 1, 2009 1:36 PM

I, for one, am confused by our moderator overlords. I've submitted two comments. The second one has been approved.

The not approved comment was similar in content, but without being as bitchy or hostile, as many of the comments I'm reading here.

I'm so curious to know why it was not approved.

I also wonder how much work all this comment approving is generating.

Maybe I'm just impatient.

:(


Posted by: JGirl at April 1, 2009 1:36 PM

Yeah, figgy, that's a terrible idea.

Anyway, I woke up with something of a head cold, and was in too much of a foggy haze to realize that it is April 1st, and, as happens every year, some website has gotten me all hot and bothered over nothing.

This is clearly an April Fool's joke.

At least, it sure as shit should be.

Posted by: ChristianH at April 1, 2009 1:36 PM

Pissboy, I like the cut of your jib.

Um, let's see... topic, topic...

You know who else likes to censor things? Hitler.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at April 1, 2009 1:37 PM

PissBoy can say Cage sucks dick, and he wants Julie to sit on his face and wiggle, but Pookie is the bad buy? Right, I'm being singled out and it's not fair!!!

Posted by: Pookie at April 1, 2009 1:37 PM

See what this is doing? It's tearing us apart! There's no dirty innuendo! tamatha's forced to repeat herself! Everyone is arguing! It's like all of my dysfunctional family gatherings got dumped into Red China and poked with a self-righteous-stick! MAKE IT ALL STOP!

sob!

Posted by: frumpiefox at April 1, 2009 1:38 PM

I love this site. Seriously, you are all like family to me. A dysfunctional, slight sexual overtones, random-ass family yes...but still a family. So I'll comply with the new world order.

But can I ask for one thing? I want one thread dedicated every week to blatant sex. Make it a "Makeout of the Week" thread, for all the flirty and grabby Pajibettes (and some of us, ahem, voyeur types). Cuz that'd be awesome, and go worlds towards keeping the pervs satiated.

Was that a bad choice of words?

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at April 1, 2009 1:38 PM

I do love all the other changes. More reviews, old columns we haven't heard from in a while coming back, and I'm loving Smokin and stipe's reviews. More TV reviews! Hurrah!

Posted by: figgy at April 1, 2009 1:38 PM

Ah. I think I know what's going on.

Posted by: Fi at April 1, 2009 1:39 PM

As I suspected, there are more than a few "Eloquents" who are deciding to quit this place because they've been asked to conduct themselves as thinking adults rather than hyperactive attention seekers in need of validation. This site existed long before them and will thrive long after they've gone sulking down the road in search of new playgrounds and a fresh crop of youngsters whom they can bully. It will continue to thrive because there are enough people reading the good work of excellent writers who genuinely love sharing their take on films, books and music.
To those among you who are taking your ball and going home: You will be missed and I wish you much luck in finding a similar site that will provide the forum you so desperately need.

Posted by: Spender at April 1, 2009 1:39 PM

Down with censorship. Fight the power. Rage against the Pajiba machine! Ladies...burn your bras! ...at my house. I'll turn the heat up so you can feel free to wonder the room shirtless for a bit if needs be.

...boo I want to wear you ass as a hat.

Posted by: PissBoy at April 1, 2009 1:42 PM

Wait...is this an April Fools Joke?

No seriously, I hate this day because if something unexpected happens I never know if someone is messin' with me.

Poop.

Posted by: lil_a at April 1, 2009 1:44 PM

Screw you guys, I'm going home.

Posted by: admin at April 1, 2009 1:44 PM

OOOO!!! Lookit everyone! I made it through the filter! I am... The. One.

Flock to me seekers of the Pajibnographic! For i will show you the way!

Posted by: PissBoy at April 1, 2009 1:44 PM

Seriously Rowles, is Spender really the type of commentor that's going to pay the bills for you?

Posted by: Pookie at April 1, 2009 1:44 PM

it is April first...
Not a great day to take site altering decisions seriously.

Posted by: Enochroot at April 1, 2009 1:45 PM

Spender hurt my feelings and now I'm gonna hit him with my ball. DUSTIN! Moderate him!

Posted by: figgy at April 1, 2009 1:45 PM

asked to conduct themselves as thinking adults rather than hyperactive attention seekers in need of validation

... or perhaps thinking adults who like to get silly/stupid/jokey and occasionally go overboard?

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at April 1, 2009 1:46 PM

Okay, I'm back again, but ONLY to ask when the "Makeout of the Week" thread is going to be posted. You know, just to avoid it. and stuff.

Posted by: Mrcreosote at April 1, 2009 1:47 PM

No one realized this was an April Fool's Day Joke?
Really? I skimmed to make sure but come on people. The Sister Act Review fooled me once. But this is way too obvious, DR. Gotta get up a bit earlier to fool this young pup.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at April 1, 2009 1:47 PM

Ummm... April Fool's?

Posted by: Mandy at April 1, 2009 1:47 PM

tamatha's forced to repeat herself!


I know frumpiefox! It's making me look foolish. Don't you agree?

Posted by: tamatha at April 1, 2009 1:47 PM

I sorta like the "Saturday Hijack" threads. Could y'all maybe throw us a weekly sandbox thread to play in, so we don't mess up your purty review threads?

Actually I think comment moderation is generally a good idea. It can be daunting to see a thread that's showing 100+ comments; you can tell that's a conversation that went south. I just don't think it would hurt you to leave a little space for the non sequiturs and the blather, which is often quite amusing.

Posted by: Jerce at April 1, 2009 1:47 PM

Look at PissBoy sexual harass all the ladies, but Pookie is the bad guy. Rowles, I demand an audience with you so I can protest being banned from Pajiba.

Posted by: Pookie at April 1, 2009 1:47 PM

hey is this an april fools joke?

Posted by: annoyingmouse at April 1, 2009 1:47 PM

HAHA! Nice. One post and I'm already censored.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at April 1, 2009 1:48 PM

Um, April Fools joke, right?

Not that I wouldn't love the comments being moderated, but am pretty sure this would never happen 'round these parts.

Posted by: Erin at April 1, 2009 1:49 PM

Why am I the only one being penisized?

Posted by: Pookie at April 1, 2009 1:49 PM

Ok, I kinda agree with the Pajiba Overlords. It's happened too many times to count that I read a review, want to to have my say, and then get to the comments section only to discover that all that's left is a flirtatious conversation between two commenters.

That in a nutshell is why I hardly post on here anymore. I agree that Pajiba shouldn't lose all of it's fun (though slightly obnoxious) comments, but as TK said, there's a time and a place. And as someone studying film and hoping to be a critic myself someday I can see how disrespectful it must feel to have the comment section on your review be tainted by bullshit.

I love this site, the whole reason I started frequenting it is because I found so many of the comments fresh, witty, insightful and fucking intelligent as hell which is extremely hard to find on the vast landscape that is the internet. Believe me when I say, things have definitely changed around here in the last year. I still love Pajiba, but hot damn, I miss those witty comments. Inside jokes between commenters on a movie review post hardly gets me rearing to go.

Posted by: citizen_cris at April 1, 2009 1:50 PM

April Fools Day but this dont seem like a prank. Oh well

Posted by: Continental Almonds at April 1, 2009 1:50 PM

Ahem
Perhaps
Reading
In
Lateral

Form
Offends
Our
Leader

Salutations,

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at April 1, 2009 1:51 PM

And then all the comments came flooding back. I was hoping this would last longer.

Posted by: branded at April 1, 2009 1:52 PM

Oh crap, was this an April Fools joke? I didn't comment on the one last year because, clever woman that I am, figured it out. What happened to me this year? I blame all the studying. Stupid school. Or maybe just stupid me.

Posted by: citizen_cris at April 1, 2009 1:52 PM

Lirpa Sloof?

Posted by: Lanky at April 1, 2009 1:53 PM

Eh. I come here for the reviews, not the commentary. More moderation goes against my principles and I've seen it go badly, but seeing as I can count the total number of comments I've made on my digits in the... four?... years I've been reading here...

Yeah. Whatever. Keep reviewing movies and I'll keep popping by.

Posted by: Spike at April 1, 2009 1:53 PM

And then all the comments came flooding back. I was hoping this would last longer.

the April Fool's joke, that is.

Posted by: branded at April 1, 2009 1:53 PM

E is royally pissed at you, Dustin. He was really looking forward to hijacking a thread or two once he learns his letters and gets this whole typing thing down. Instead, he'll just have to be satisfied with babbling angrily in your general direction.

"Blah blah buh buh rooowr blah whoa!" roughly translates to "Eat a dick, Rowles!"

Posted by: Kolby at April 1, 2009 1:54 PM

Just my nickel's worth:

1. I think since a lot of Eloquents have found each other on Facebook (I don't consider myself an Eloquent, but I have found some lovely Pajibans on FB), that can be a better outlet for just shooting the shit. In fact, it already is. Facebook is nearly all about shooting the shit, in fact, so that's awesome. I'm surprised there hasn't been a decrease in off-topic comments since the Pajiba group over there was formed.

2. I've never run a website, but I've been through the battles and wars of about a trillion in the past decade or so. I've seen some go down in flames, I've seen some taken down by the very users who claimed to love it, everything in between. I've seen total anything goes anarchy and the fascist stuff you describe.

Here's what I've seen work the absolute best and it's a bit too late in light of this announcement but--the sites who have had the most success in dealing with this just go ahead and do what you describe, but they never announce it or make a big thing out of it. They just quietly, relentlessly remove anything they feel fit to remove. If anyone bitches, the same relentless answer is given over and over: "inappropriate" (it covers everything from just off-topic to really horribly bad profane stuff). And life moves on. Those who are pissed off about it leave, and good riddance and those who stay adjust to it. And like you said, it's your site. Nothing about free speech applies here, it's a site, not a country.

Again, I know I'm saying this too late as an announcement has been made. But of course now that you've said it you've gotta do it (that's also the #2 rule of parenting, right behind "feed and clothe them").

The only thing I'd be careful about is to apply this policy to *everyone,* no matter how hated or beloved. If the commenter who is the absolute secret favorite of everyone who writes for this site says something completely inappropriate, their stuff gets deleted just like anyone else. I'm not saying you wouldn't do this, but I've seen a lot of sites announce fascism and then slowly get to the point where they are applying it selectively. I also say this as a former teacher. I know how important it is to apply the rules to one and all. Nothing breeds resentment faster than not doing so.

Good luck!

Posted by: Anastasia Beaverhausen at April 1, 2009 1:54 PM

Oh GODDAMNIT.

I HATE forgetting what day it is and getting completely phooled like that.

SHIT.

Posted by: Jerce at April 1, 2009 1:54 PM

Only question is, how many eloquents are plants to support this year's April Fool's prank? The only moderating that happens in these threads is when we called last year's April fool's prank too early and got our comments deleted. Prove me wrong, guys. (I love you guys).

Posted by: jaytwo at April 1, 2009 1:54 PM

I knew it was a joke becuase most gay guys always use April 1st to make jokes.

Posted by: Pookie at April 1, 2009 1:54 PM

April 1 will be a day remembered as the end of Pajiba as we knew it. And nothing else.

*cough*

Posted by: The Wandering Parakeet at April 1, 2009 1:55 PM

I seriously would have gotten this faster if I wasn't sick.

...Yeah...let's go with that...

Posted by: ChristianH at April 1, 2009 1:56 PM

Heh!

My message got through the original anti April Fools day filter.

I was like Hans Fuckin' Solo slipping through the Empire's grasp!

Kessel Run. Less than 12 Parsecs. Suck it.

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at April 1, 2009 1:58 PM

Okay, I'm back once again, because of the whole April fool's thing, but still the Makeout of the Week thread? That was real, right?


Damn it.

Posted by: Mrcreosote at April 1, 2009 1:58 PM

Well, we all fell for it for a while, so kudos to the Overlords.

Posted by: Cindy at April 1, 2009 1:59 PM

Hmm, I totally forgot it was April Fool's too. Maybe this isn't entirely a joke, but more like a clever ruse using the fact that it's April 1st to figure out what most of the readership would prefer?

Posted by: tinmo at April 1, 2009 1:59 PM

Aw, shucks. I was hoping it'd last a little longer - it took me a few minutes to come up with that babytalk crap!

Posted by: Kolby at April 1, 2009 1:59 PM

If I put something about April Fools Day is it going to be moderated :)

Posted by: Ashley at April 1, 2009 1:59 PM

I am also curious about which Eloquents are plants. Because if they aren't, there are going to be A LOT of pissed off lurkers.

And how dare Prisco mock Kayanne's high heels.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at April 1, 2009 2:00 PM

Prepare to be skull fucked Rowles.

Posted by: Pookie at April 1, 2009 2:00 PM

Awww, a shoutout from Prisco. You know I'd defend you too if someone gave you incorrect bullshit, now gimme a hug!

Posted by: Jay at April 1, 2009 2:01 PM

Ok, so you got us good, but I liked you a lot more when I thought you really were fed up with how asinine the comments section has gotten. I fucking hate April Fool's Day!

Posted by: tinmo at April 1, 2009 2:04 PM

The key to any good joke, especially on April Fools Day , is there is some truth and some outlandish lie. In the case above, the site will have nightly updates and more reviews. The lie would come in in that the groub of Pajibans were EVER sober enough during SXSW to have a meaningful discussion as to the direction of the site.

Oh, and the issue about monitoring and/or cencoring the site is a load of bolllucks. This site prides itself on its community. That same community that will band together to fight and support someone when they are terminal (R.I.P. AlabamaPink, we love ya). The same community that will have an all out war against zombies, plan the apocolypse together, and come up with the murder tank, a God Octopus, and any number of other unique and wonderful ideas.

I understand it's April Fools, but to tell the people that the very bond that has made this site so great will be changed, monitored, altered... well it is just a ginormous insult to all who have formed a family here.

And since this post is actually about the review above and not entirely off topic.. plus it contains no sexual innuendos, cussing, or other negative information that would warrant censorship as described above... well you can just go and suck..... I'm not going to finish that sentence... not cuz your cencorship, but because I choose to be above it... I choose!

And happy April Fools Day !

Posted by: Nico at April 1, 2009 2:04 PM

What is more interesting is which of the lurkers started talking shit about the regulars, Spender you are a fucking sellout. You fucking management sucking shill, you fucking scab.

Posted by: Pookie at April 1, 2009 2:05 PM

I think I can support the moderation, mostly because I don't get the impression that Dustin is equating moderation with censorship. It doesn't seem like everyone's going to have to put away their bitchy words or funny banter. And I'm guessing some permitted comments will still inevitably allude to one Eloquent finding something sexy, or something like that. But when you're reading a review of a movie, or book, or whatever, and want to express your thoughts on it and discuss it with people who have supposedly read the same review, but are too intimidated to do so because umpteen commenters are falling all over themselves to get another commenter to talk about their boobs, even going so far as to link to photgraphs of their boobs, and things are seriously freaking raunchy, that's when the site moderator needs to step in. One thing that really struck me, when everyone was expressing their sadness over AlabamaPink's passing, was the number of people coming out of the woodwork to say that they were always too afraid of the Eloquents to post anything. That's not cool. I don't think random grossness and quasi-uncomfortable sex-talk is what makes the Pajiba community what it is. We're better than that. If you really need this place as a sex outlet then I don't think you're getting enough in real life. Also - Didn't Pajiba start some kind of random comment thread for us a while ago, or did I dream that?

Posted by: b at April 1, 2009 2:07 PM

I. Am. Dumbass.

Posted by: dammitjanet at April 1, 2009 2:08 PM

There's gonna be a lurker purge. Cyberbodies will be lining the streets. Pookie and BSlim are gonna go Viking on their asses.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at April 1, 2009 2:09 PM

April Fools

Posted by: cockroach at April 1, 2009 2:13 PM

Great point b, but Rowles has on occasion started this raunchy behavior. The Dick Sucking List, or the DSL if you prefer, is a prime example, but you are right, moderation is the key. From this moment on, I pledge to keep my comments on topic as best I can.

Posted by: Pookie at April 1, 2009 2:13 PM

Mleaaaaaaaaaah April 1st. Very nice Dustin.

Posted by: b at April 1, 2009 2:15 PM

And yes, PissBoy, you can wear my ass as a hat.

You know you don't have to ask.

Posted by: boo at April 1, 2009 2:16 PM

Sweet. That's always the most awkward part...the asking.

Posted by: PissBoy at April 1, 2009 2:18 PM

Dammit. Now I look stupid. Well, I'm blaming the fact that I have work seriously on the brain today and my kid is sick, too. I wasn't even thinking about the date. Whatever, y'all.

Posted by: Anastasia Beaverhausen at April 1, 2009 2:20 PM

Well played, sir.

Posted by: bucdaddy at April 1, 2009 2:21 PM

Haha, I like how every other comment is someone saying, "Am I the only one who realized what day today is?!" like it's some puzzle only they could figure out.

If the post itself is a joke, but the moderating is still going to be put in place, I'm ok with that, since I've been watching the site for so many years yet rarely comment for reasons stated by many above. That being said, I have a huge issue (if it isn't a joke) with the way this whole thing was said. A bunch of people mentioned things about it being rude to readers, or hostile or whatever. I agree. There's a way to go about treating loyal fans and supporters, and treating them like naughty children is not the way to do that. It's unwarranted. Without the people on here you have no site, really, except for your own egos, and to go on with the "fascist" bullpoop is just not cool, if it isn't a joke.

Posted by: Marcela at April 1, 2009 2:22 PM

Dammit April Fool's jokes always get past me, mainly because I assign no importance to this day. However, I stand by what I said. But it not like I'm leaving the site if moderation doesn't happen. This site fucking rules.

Posted by: stardust savant at April 1, 2009 2:36 PM

MY PICTURE, MY CHOICE!!!!!

Posted by: Sofía at April 1, 2009 3:03 PM

Cyberbodies will be lining the streets.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at April 1, 2009 2:09 PM

If there's something I learned from the Communists it's how to make lists and mass executions...


/compiles

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 1, 2009 3:05 PM

MY PICTURE, MY CHOICE!!!!!

That was awesome Sofia, and when I started catching on.

Posted by: admin at April 1, 2009 3:10 PM

I, for one, will start reading comments again.

Posted by: Jere at April 1, 2009 3:26 PM

Uh-oh. I sense the Overlords have, intentionally or unintentionally, created a dilemma for themselves: Which camp to appease? The old-timers who want everything left the way it is (how conservative of us!) and the lurkers and sometimers who would like to join in if things were more ... civil?

Seems like we're kinda split down the middle.

Posted by: bucdaddy at April 1, 2009 3:29 PM

Are we really that unkind? I mean...I lurked for, like, 18 months before I first posted. I actually hated most of you. Then I posted, and realized that I was a bit of a douche for not doing so earlier.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at April 1, 2009 3:34 PM

Pookie - thanks for the mom comment... old school, I like!

Why did it take me 5 hrs to comment back to you? I have a JOB, you worthless Manor living scum bag. Hope that you have fun on the internets today w/ your pants around your legs.

Posted by: Ted at April 1, 2009 3:46 PM

There's gonna be a lurker purge. Cyberbodies will be lining the streets. Pookie and BSlim are gonna go Viking on their asses.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at April 1, 2009 2:09 PM
****************************************************

If it is a joke and those who've de-lurked are being hung out to dry, so to speak... bring it ON.

Posted by: Spender at April 1, 2009 3:50 PM

I believe I posted the first time I stumbled across this friggin' time-suck. Nowhere else. For me it was the awesome reviews followed by actual sentences as opposed to cyber-speak. Legibility is a big plus in my book.

Come out, ye wretched lurkers - take the halfling's claw in your left hand, a blue tentacle in your right - let's frolic through the shiny fields of sunshiny sunshine...

Posted by: Skitz at April 1, 2009 5:21 PM

There you go, Spender! That's the spirit!

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at April 1, 2009 5:49 PM

Thanks, AvB... today has been a hell of an eye-opener for a lot of us.
I mentioned in the reveal thread that since a lot of us lurkers have had our Pajiba cherries popped, we might as well stick around for the abuse... taking AND giving.

Posted by: Spender at April 1, 2009 6:00 PM

i lurked for a while before jumping on in, but only because i was reading on my phone browser and didn't want to 'text' comments. once my home pc was back up, i just started commenting like anyone else.

i totally don't get people who might be frightened of the locals on ANY board or thread.
plus, pajiba is billed as being 'scathing' and 'bitchy'.
if de-lurking on here is going to cause you that much anxiety, search out a 'polite' site.
myself, i find people very welcoming on pajiba. even pookie has a chance to rip on me once and took pity :)
and kayanne is my new *Heart*.

in conclusion,
later.

Posted by: gp at April 1, 2009 6:03 PM

This is like when police use radio stations to get criminals to come out of the
woodwork and arrested. I think the Denver police used a radio station to lure
deadbeat dads out into the open with Super Bowl tickets. Now it is the lurkers
who want control over what is said, how Obama-like. The first to go would
be conservatives like me, because we are dead and buried as a group anyway,
and I do not think I would be missed too much.

Posted by: richmac at April 1, 2009 6:46 PM

Hey. Is this is an April Fools joke or something?

Posted by: Beyonce Rowles at April 1, 2009 7:01 PM

I just want to warn you new people that there are users here at Pajiba. People who will pretend to be nice to you, and in the next breath bat you around like a little mouse, grab their PajibOscar and walk on like they never knew you.

Posted by: notCindy at April 1, 2009 7:53 PM

Pajiba Personals = Evolution

Since there are 27 females to each 1 male here at Pajiba...thems good odds for the single males...

When are they debuting?

Posted by: WhoWhatWhere at April 1, 2009 8:55 PM

Most of the men aren't single either. Why do you think there's stories about Yo Gabba Gabba? This place is a wasteland for singles. One's just gotta accept that hardship and struggle on.

Posted by: Jay at April 1, 2009 10:02 PM

unless it were "home-wrecker wendesday".

Posted by: gp at April 1, 2009 11:00 PM

I knew it was an April Fool's gag after reading Dustin's last paragraph, but I wish it wasn't. I've been coming to Pajiba for almost 3 years and I have no idea what's going on half the time because most of the comments have nothing to do with the films. It does feel like a popularity contest as to who can say the better/snarkier comment, but whatever.

Posted by: Brie at April 2, 2009 12:34 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time