web
counter
 

It'll Be Just Like in the Movies. Pretending to be Somebody Else

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Miscellaneous | Comments (34)



mulholland-drive_l.jpg

David Lynch’s profoundly weird Mulholland Dr. is a time commitment. Though the movie itself is just two-and-a-half hours, if you’re like me, at the end of it, you’re left scratching your head and wondering, “What the fuck did I just see?” After my first viewing, I was more than confused — I was irritated. It seemed like nothing more than a needlessly weird series of scenes incoherently strung together. There’s some powerfully emotive stuff in there, but for tiny-brained folks like myself, it’s hard to make anything of what’s actually going on. Spend another hour online reading theories and explanations, and suddenly, a lot of those pieces begin to come together, and an appreciating for Mulholland Dr. begins to take shape. Watch it a second time, and you’ll still likely come away thinking, “What the fuck?” but you might do it with a sense of respect and admiration, although it’d take far more viewings than I have the capacity for to truly understand what’s going on, and even then, I doubt everything will come together.

Mulholland Dr. is one of the few films that truly is up to the viewer’s interpretation, and those interpretations are many and varied. It helps to try to piece together the actual chronology of events — there appears to be little narrative order in Lynch’s film. And once you nail down the essential elements of the film, you can start to theorize about the symbolism, and perhaps even crack the code on a lot of the gibberish scenes. I haven’t gotten that far yet in my exploration, which is what makes Mulholland Dr. the perfect film for the Pajiba Movie Club (thanks, Yosarrian). If you take other people’s interpretations into your next viewing, you can get even more out of it.

As before, I’ll open with a few discussion questions and — once you get the lesbian love scene out of your system — allow you to take it from there.

1) First, what are your general impressions of Mulholland Dr.? Love it? Hate it? Or you have no idea? Is it a thought-provoking challenging film, or just needlessly weird?

2) Mulholland Dr. was originally conceived as a television series, but no network picked it up, so Lynch slapped an ending on it and called it a movie. There are, at least in my opinion, several nonsense sequences in Mulholland Dr. (the men in the diner, the creepy old people, the dwarf on the phone) — do you think they were open-ended sequences to be picked up in a potential television series, or just emotive Lynchian gibberish? Does it even matter?

3) Back in college, creative writing instructors often suggest that you should never end a story with either a suicide or a dream. Lynch managed to do both. Is it a brilliant way to end the movie, or a complete cop-out? Do you think that’s what he had in mind from the outset, or did he corner himself into it?

4) The diner scene with the nightmare monster. What the hell?

5) I’m still not entirely sure what Lynch was trying to do, say, or accomplish with the cowboy. Anyone care to take a stab at the cowboy’s significance to the story?

6) There are a lot of layers, it seems, to peel back to see what’s underneath. One of the major themes, however, is Lynch’s view of the emptiness of Hollywood, and how the gloss and beauty of it (Betty) obscures the ugliness beneath (Diane). Did you get that? Would you care to expand? And what is Lynch trying to say about those of us who consume Hollywood products?

7) How would you place Mulholland Dr. among other Lynch films?

8) The blue key and the blue box — I understand their use in the movie (the key signifies the death of Rita, and inside the blue box, so to speak, is the alternative reality flashback — the idealized version of Diane’s life and her relationship with Rita). But why a blue key and a blue box? Is there any significance attached to that?

9) Billy Ray Cyrus? Really?

10) Finally, what is Lynch trying to say with that extended lesbian scene?

Happy discussing, folks. I’m really interested in where this conversation leads.









The Last Dude | Ryan Reynolds and Anna Faris Share TMI













Comments

Here is my attempt at a summary of what is really going on in Mulholland Drive for those of you who have only seen it a few times (I'm sorry it's so ungodly long):

Basically, the whole movie is a dream that Diane Selwyn (Naomi Watts) has shortly before killing herself. Everything that comes before the Club Silencio/opening of the blue box/"hey pretty girl, time to wake up" part is her dream. Everything that comes after is the "real world" although most of it takes place in flashbacks. In the flashbacks we finally learn who Naomi Watts character really is (a struggling actress getting chewed up by Hollywood, recently left by her lesbian lover who is now dating a big director) and what she's done (hired someone to kill her former lover). These events and the resulting guilt take their psychological toll on Diane. They inspire her dream and then lead her to suicide.

It only adds to the confusion that Lynch decides to fuck with us in dream world and rotate names and identities. For example: The Naomi Watts character is named Diane. When she is at Winkies hiring a hit man she is served by a waitress named Betty. Then in her dream she adopts the name Betty when she reinvents herself as a fresh-faced and naturally talented ingenue. At one point in the dream she is at that diner where the waitress now has her name, Diane, which looks familiar(obviously) and therefore gets absorbed into the amnesia investigation as they search for the identity of Rita. This search eventually leads them to Diane Selwyn's apartment where they find the dead body that foreshadows Diane's eventual suicide (lying in the same position that sleeping Diane is in when she wakes up). But you don't have access to any of this information until the end of the movie and by then you are so confused and frustrated that you don't even want to try to understand what is going on.

It actually makes a lot more sense to watch the last half hour first, which is what I finally did last week. The last half hour is mostly flash back to the events leading up to her dream and suicide.

------------
Here is a synopsis of the events that actually happen in the "real-world": (feel free to skip this part)

Diane wakes up looking like hell with her neighbor pounding on the door wanting her stuff back [also, notice there is a blue key on the coffee table in this scene, this is a sign that the hit man has completed the job she hired him for: that her ex-girlfriend is already dead] She is very emotional, and appears to hallucinate her (dead) ex-girlfriend Camilla Rhodes (Laura Harring). Then she starts flashing back to some topless lesbian play on the couch, when Camilla started to break up with her. "It's him, isn't it." Diane says, and then we flash back further to Diane and Camilla on the set of some 50's movie. Justin Theroux is the director and apparently the "him" in Camilla's life. Camilla is the star of the film and Diane is on the sidelines with a smaller part.

The flashback continues to Camilla inviting Diane to some sort of party at the director's house on Mulholland Drive. She arrives in a car, "we aren't supposed to stop here" but it is just some back way to the house where we see a lot of other familiar faces (familiar because this party occurred in the past and the people at the party were incorporated into her dream). At the party Diane tells us a little bit more about herself: She came to LA from Deep River, Ontario after winning a dance contest and inheriting some money from her aunt. She met Camilla on the set of a movie called "the Sylvia North Story". Daine wanted the lead but it went to Camilla. They became friends (and, we presume, lovers) and Camilla, the more successful actress, continued to help Diane get parts in some of her other films. We can assume that this is all the true back story of these characters in the real-world.

Diane grows more agitated as the party progresses. A strange woman comes over and kisses Camilla. The director guy and Camilla start to make an announcement (are they engaged?) but can't stop laughing. Note: Since this part of the movie is a flashback that Diane is having from her apartment (after she wakes from the dream, before she kills herself) we can question the reliability of her memories (were they really laughing uncontrollably and shooting her weird looks or is this just the way that Diane remembers the betrayal and humiliation of being invited to their party?)

And then, still in flashback, we jump to a Winkie's Diner where Diane is talking to a hit man. She is going to use the money she inherited from her aunt to have Camilla killed. She shows him a picture: "this is the girl." The hit man tells her that once she pays him, it is done. He shows her a blue key which is going to be used to signify to her when the job is done (which we saw on her coffee table before this extended flashback). Then things get a little surreal as Diane's deteriorating psychological state starts to intrude on the flashback. There is the demon/homeless person behind the diner and the crazy miniature old people who come after her- this seems to be somehow a manifestation of her guilt over having Camilla murdered- and then the flashback ends and we return to real-world, real-time Diane in her apartment at the breaking point.

The mini old people come in under her door and grow to full size but there is still knocking at the door (maybe the police, the two officers who were looking for her?) Diane is being chased around the room, tormented by her demons and her guilt (are these manifestations of her parents? Her aunt? Just some couple she met at the airport that represent her break from innocence on her arrival in LA?) and she runs screaming into her bedroom, pulls a gun out of the end table and shoots herself in the head. There are a few superimposed images of Diane and Camilla together, ghostly remnants of her dream as the last few synapses fire before fade out. The whole film (real-world, real-time) takes place entirely in the apartment. First she has the dream, then she wakes and has the flashbacks, then she commits suicide.

/ boring Summary
---------------

The structure of the movie is difficult of follow but it does make sense. The primary story being told in the film is the dream-story, not the actual one (like the Wizard of Oz). We get the dream first, which is disorienting because it follows a kind of dream-logic that never gives you a firm hold on what is going on. It is filled with vague illusions, symbols, and references to real-world events (that haven't been revealed to us yet) and introduces a lot of mysteries that don't get resolved (these are dream mysteries, dead ends that don't have any resolution).

After waking from the dream we get the flashbacks to the "real-word" events that lead to the dream. This provides us with a context to understand the dream and Diane's fragile mental state (it's also a hell of a performance by Naomi Watts, who wasn't even nominated for an Academy Award, but Bridget Jones was, and Halle Berry won). Once we know the real-world story we see how the dream is Diane's idealized and stylized fantasy of Hollywood, the movies, herself, and her lover... And all the while the darker side of things, the jealousy, the guilt over what she's done, the power and corruption that control the industry and the evil that lurks around corners or within herself continually intrudes on that dream world and eventually tears it apart.

Watching it again (and again and again) we see how artifacts from the real-world and flashback scenes at the end of the film keep turning up in bizarre places in the dream world (stack of money the purse, blue key, black & white head shot, espresso). And how people from the real world were repurposed for the dream. Aside from the idealized version of herself there is the director who gets emasculated, thrown out of his house, loses control of his movie, and basically has his life torn apart until he is put in his place. Camilla/Rita is now dependent on her for help and support, and part of a sexual fantasy as well. The hit man she hired is a bumbling idiot (the assignment to kill Camilla/Rita obviously failing) and goes through the darkly comic scene in the office building. Even small characters who appear in the background at the party get incorporated into her dream as powerful and shady figures. Coco, the director's mother, becomes the landlady at her apartment. The Castigliane brother with the espresso can be seen at the party, and a strange man in cowboy clothes passes out of the room at one point. It is reminiscent of the ending of The Wizard of Oz ("And you and you and you...and you were there.") where it is revealed that the main events of the film were a dream populated by familiar people and events in different roles.

Even bits of dialogue from her real-world memories were turning up in the dream most notably "this is the girl" which we learn was something actually said by Diane as she paid to have Camilla killed and gets repeated in the dream by the powerful and unnerving men in suits who seem to be controlling events from behind the scenes. It was actually Diane that set these events in motion (that's her phone by the red lampshade and the ashtray that rings at one point).

But I've gone on long enough and still barely covered the surface-level understanding. What does all of it mean? There are so many great scenes, so much symbolism and complex layers to unravel...

(Also, where do I pick up the award for longest comment in Pajiba history?)

Posted by: Yossarian at November 17, 2009 3:03 PM

Apologies, I have to sit this one out. Yeah, I know you bitches is disappointed. I'll be back to read the comments though.

Posted by: admin at November 17, 2009 3:08 PM

Brace yourself, folks; work is slow and I have a lot to say…

That first paragraph sums up my experience—I found myself frustrated, confused, but interested enough to do some online research and figure out what the hell I just saw. I can appreciate a movie that makes me think, even if I barely slept that night because my brain kept churning away, trying to make sense of something that might be, in the end, nonsensical.

OK, so this was supposed to be a potential series, right? Because otherwise a few scenes just seemed to come out of absolutely nowhere and have nearly no relevance to anything. The Winkie’s scene, for instance. Who were those guys? What did they have to do with anything? And the scene with the bungling hit man. I laughed, I thought it was hilarious at how much he sucked, but then it just made me wonder if he could have even carried out a hit on Camilla if he was that inept. If this was supposed to be a series I could see why you’d need to setup some characters and why it wouldn’t necessarily gel with the rest of the film.

I liked it. I usually like most of Lynch’s stuff, and it was nice for a change that there weren’t any super-gross images (like the lancing of Baron Harkonnen’s boils in Dune. Eww!). I also like how his films don’t seem set in any particular era. I got a lot of 50s vibes coming off this one (like with Wild at Heart), just from the clothing and set design and the way Plucky Betty behaved. I don’t recall seeing a single computer throughout the film, but there were cell phones. I didn’t find it confusing, just interesting.

I loved Adam’s character, simply because he seemed to represent the audience. Weird shit is going down, and he doesn’t get it, but he goes along with it anyway like he expects to eventually wake up out of this wacko bullshit nightmare. The pink paint on his coat and the way he causally carried a golf club around were nice touches.

Because I’m used to Lynchian weirdness, I managed not to yell “WTF?” until the Club Silencio scene (I yelled something equally rude at the appearance of Billy Ray Cyrus—seriously, the hell?). I had read about this movie before and the general consensus seems to be that the disillusioned Betty we see near the end is the real one, and the bulk of the movie is something she dreamed up before dying. So her beloved Camilla escapes the hit Betty put out on her and becomes a vulnerable amnesiac who needs Betty’s help, and they develop a loving relationship instead of a destructive one. But there were plenty of people who felt the movie wasn’t meant to be interpreted but just watched. Since my mind is the kind that can’t leave well enough alone but demands ANSWERS and LOGIC, I tried to figure out all the roles people were playing within this dream.

I took Wheelchair dude to be the part of Betty’s brain that was directing everything to her satisfaction, the various thugs to be acting out Betty’s revenge fantasies on the guy who stole her lover, and the old couple—well, shit, I don’t know who those white-haired freaks were supposed to be. Creepy as hell, that’s for sure. Maybe her conscience? They seemed gleeful in the cab, like they knew how it was going to end and boy wouldn’t it be fun to see Betty get what she deserves? Random old guys in big empty rooms are typical Lynch, so I don’t even try to make sense of them. ToastFace Homeless Guy—well, he wound up with the box, and the old people came out of the box, and so….

Yeah, I got nothing. Still liked it though.

Posted by: DeadBessie at November 17, 2009 3:10 PM

Thank Godtopus for you, Yossarian, now no one can get on my case about my long comments. I gotta take off but I look forward to reading your thoughts tomorrow.

Posted by: DeadBessie at November 17, 2009 3:13 PM

"once you get the lesbian love scene out of your system — allow you to take it from there."


Nope, not gonna happen

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 17, 2009 3:15 PM

(Also, where do I pick up the award for longest comment in Pajiba history?)

We'll have a car pick you up. You'll meet The Cowboy. Don't back talk him.

Posted by: D-Day at November 17, 2009 3:16 PM

re: the little old people

Some theorize that Diane's grandparents (who she lived with back in Ontario) were abusive to her (the reason why the opening sequence of her winning the dance contest shows them blurred out - there is something bad about them that she is trying to block out) and that their return at the end signifies one more threatening memory from her past that triggers her suicide.

Others point to the common Lynchian of the unexplainable, the red herring, the dead end. Lynch will purposefully insert things into his movie that *seem* to have some symbolic value but that in fact refer to nothing or to nonsense. It is a game that he plays in order to make the point that not everything in life makes perfect sense, not everything is an allegory, not everything has an explanation. According to this theory, (1) the first theory is playing an interpretation that is invalid. It represents an attempt to place order onto a chaotic world. and (2) Diane's suicide is *partially* triggered by all of these traumas and jealous rages that she recently encountered. But not entirely. Just as the "dream" was not an accurate and truthful recounting of Diane's life, neither are these "memories." We don't have access to her inner life and so we can never *really* understand everything about her and about her decision to end her life.

That said, I have another contribution to the interpretation game. That neighbor who comes over to demand her stuff, the kinda frumpy brunette? Some (me included) think that *she* is actually the ex-lover that Diane wanted dead. Camilla is simply that woman looked at through the eyes of a lover. Diane sees her as beautiful, talented, perfect in every way, the center of a life that is worthless is Camilla is not in it. But in the "real" world, we see a more "objective" view of that same woman. (Similar to the operation that makes "Betty" a better dressed, sunnier, more talented actress than Diane is in real life). Thus, the "neighbor" is demanding her stuff because she is moving out and dumping Diane.

Posted by: megan at November 17, 2009 3:20 PM

@Yossarian: Ok, that was actually extremely helpful. Thank you!

Posted by: mae at November 17, 2009 3:37 PM

Dustin's question #6 is the one I am most interested in. What is Lynch really trying to say about Hollywood with this movie. I can't bring myself to take a totally cynical view of his portrayal. In some ways this film feels like a love letter to classic movies, old Hollywood, great actressin'. At the same time he insists on rubbing your face in the vileness and corruption just beneath the surface, like the opening of blue velvet where roses and picket fences give way to teaming insect life underground.

Does Lynch claim to care about how Hollywood destroys it's leading ladies? This is the guy who has been accused frequently of outright misogyny in portrayal of women (Blue Velvet, Wild at Heart, Lost Highway).

Does he have nothing but contempt for the movie industry, or is there a bit of sympathy for Adam Kesher (Justin Theroux) being strong-armed by mysterious men in suits who seize control of his film (and while this is, in some ways, still critical of Hollywood it is also a championing of the auteur like Lynch).

Posted by: Yossarian at November 17, 2009 3:43 PM

Megan -- I wrote up a long question to Yossarian about the next door neighbor, and right before I posted it, I noticed that you'd completely answered it. Thanks -- that was one part of the film that always nagged at me. And you mostly confirmed my suspicions.

Posted by: Dustin Rowles at November 17, 2009 3:56 PM

Well, Yossarian basically said everything, so what is left to say?

I don't know that it's a dream though so much as events coursing through Diane's (Naomi Watts) head.

1) First, what are your general impressions of Mulholland Dr.?

I adore it. I think the actresses are fantastic, and I'm a huge fan of Lynch's style.

2) Mulholland Dr. was originally conceived as a television series...

I think many things were created so the audience would have a lot to mull over (in trying to put it all together) if the movie had been a series.

3) Back in college, creative writing instructors often suggest that you should never end a story with either a suicide or a dream...

Again, I don't think it was a dream, per se. I have no issues with the way the film ended, as everything came together for me - it all made sense.

4) The diner scene with the nightmare monster. What the hell?

Just Diane's version (in her head) of the homeless dude.

5) I’m still not entirely sure what Lynch was trying to do, say, or accomplish with the cowboy. Anyone care to take a stab at the cowboy’s significance to the story?

I think the cowboy is possibly Diane's agent.

6) There are a lot of layers, it seems, to peel back to see what’s underneath. One of the major themes, however, is Lynch’s view of the emptiness of Hollywood, and how the gloss and beauty of it (Betty) obscures the ugliness beneath (Diane). Did you get that? Would you care to expand?

I think for many people, the idea of Hollywood is a dream/fantasy. I think Lynch was just exploring that. I didn't get anything about us as consumers though.

7) How would you place Mulholland Dr. among other Lynch films?

It might be my favorite - or right behind Blue Velvet.

8) The blue key and the blue box — I understand their use in the movie (the key signifies the death of Rita, and inside the blue box, so to speak, is the alternative reality flashback — the idealized version of Diane’s life and her relationship with Rita). But why a blue key and a blue box? Is there any significance attached to that?

I don't know if I believe that Rita was really killed. I don't know that Diane ever knew Rita as more than a friend - that any more of the relationship existed. I think it was fantasy. I think the key was the key to Diane's happiness/dreams, and really, the box was empty.

9) Billy Ray Cyrus? Really?

Yeah, that was bad.

10) Finally, what is Lynch trying to say with that extended lesbian scene?

Fantasy!

Posted by: Cindy at November 17, 2009 4:10 PM

1) I love it. We don't have nearly enough nonlinear, stream-of-consciousness art in the cinema these days. Plus, Lynch is the master of creep-out moments, and this has a few great ones.

Incidentally, I re-watched this last night just for this event. I also watched the new Prisoner. I thought it was amusing that I have a much easier time making sense of Mulholland Drive, although I have watched it several times now.

2) Nope, it does not matter. I've had this debate quite a few times. Yes, it started as a television series that was certainly not rated-R as the last act of the film clearly is. Yes, there were threads that were not brought to fruition as Lynch originally planned. However, Lynch does a masterful job of picking up what he had already done, reimagining it, and integrating it all together. How many writers take a short story and end up bridging into a novel? How many artists take their work in one medium and let it directly inspire their work in another medium or build directly upon it? This is no different.

3) I'm guessing it wasn't the plan from the outset of the television series. Again, that does not matter to me. It certainly does not matter to me what some creative writing instructors set forth as some sort of ironclad "rule" in narrative. The suicide and the dream work here for me, and they're not exactly the point of the whole thing. I'd say the larger point is Diane's feelings for Camilla and what is inspired by those feelings. Those feelings are expressed via a dream and a suicide. Certainly there is an air of mystery here, but the entire film works as a mystery, and simply knowing that it's the film is largely a dream and that a suicide comes at the end do not comprise the answers to all the questions this film raises. It's the journey that counts.

4) The first time I saw that in the theater, I nearly had a heart attack just like the character. Angelo Badalamenti's score really shines here to build the rising dread. (Cool trivia: Badalamenti plays the mafia guy that spits out the espresso.)

As for the point, I don't know where it was going originally for the television series, but he ties the diner back into the story as the place that Diane puts the hit on Camilla. Hence, it makes sense to me that the "demon" hangs out there.

5) I love The Cowboy's riffs about attitude and the buggy. I just see him as Lynch's pseudo-supernatural, almost omniscient character who oversees the proceedings. Lynch seems to enjoy that sort of character.

I think an interesting question about The Cowboy is his warning that the director would see him "once" if he did well and "twice" if he did bad. We never see the director seeing The Cowboy at all, but we see him twice more in the film. Is this actually a comment of Diane's behavior, or is it perhaps a criticism of the director's choice indirectly leading to ruin? That is, if the director had not cast Camilla, this disillusionment and death would have never happened.

6) Yes, I agree that is a prevailing theme. I'm not sure it's a direct indictment of us personally and our consumption of Hollywood's products, but I suppose that follows logically.

I love the dichotomy of Betty's starry-eyed arrival in Los Angeles with what follows. One of my favorite details is the way that the dialogue recording is just a bit off in the scene at the curb with the old couple (which when I first saw it in the theater made me think the sound was screwed up), followed by the sustained shot of the couple smiling ridiculously in their cab. It would seem we're watching a badly done, pollyanna-ish film. Betty's naivete is so intentionally over-the-top that it blew my mind the first time I saw the audition scene. My thoughts were along the lines of: "Holy crap, Naomi Watts can act" and "Lynch was really fucking with us."

7) I haven't seen all of Lynch's films, but I think this one is my favorite. The only thing in the Lynch canon for which I have more affection is the Twin Peaks television series.

8) I could be wrong, but I didn't read this as anything beyond the fact that a blue key stands out. In Diane's mind, the mystical blue key that fits the blue box ties back to the more ordinary blue key that the hitman leaves her.

9) How many times have we seen the cliche guy-walks-into-his-bedroom-to-find-his-wife-fucking-another-guy scene? It's probably too many, and it felt too familiar to begin with in this case. However, Billy Ray really sells it and puts a different spin on it in my opinion. He's considerate and polite and only becomes rough when it's necessary. It's certainly a humorous juxtaposition with his appearance in the film.

10) I think Lynch was trying to say: "DarthCorleone, thank you for being a fan. This one's for you!"

But maybe that's just me.

Kidding aside, I don't think there's a particular message to it. It's an effective way to cement Diane's feelings and jealousy both for and of Camilla. I'm fairly confident that Diane is in fact a lesbian as evidenced by the ex-girlfriend neighbor, so it's a natural fantasy sequence for her.

That said, I'm not certain we could even say that Diane ever interacted with Camilla, or at least not in exactly the way that the last act portrays. She could just be some crazed fan who worked with her on one film and whose dreams of Hollywood were crushed in the machinery.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at November 17, 2009 4:16 PM

I thought the scene with Billy Ray was actually hilarious. Just imagine someone of his mental capacity working with a complete freak like David Lynch. "Duh...what?"

Side note: I saw Lynch "speak" at the Brattle Theater in Cambridge, MA for Inland Empire. He read some random poem and brought out a girl who played the violin terribly, and on purpose I would imagine. Sadly, that was the most normal experience of the night - Inland Empire = fucking crazy.

Posted by: Matt in DC at November 17, 2009 4:25 PM

I can't even begin to answer the questions posed above. A beautiful movie (as usual from Mr. Lynch), but I don't think I'm going to try to watch it again to try and find meaning in it. What bothered me about the movie was the supposed significance of things that were not significant and the overwrought use of symbolism.

Posted by: Brenton at November 17, 2009 4:43 PM

I love this movie (one of the few videos I willfully returned late, as I kept watching it over and over).

Question that's always bugged me...in the DVD "hints" that Lynch provided, he asks "can you hear the name of the movie that Adam Kesher is auditioning actresses for?"

The answer is of course that it's the movie that the "real life" Diane is starring in.

But I couldn't hear anyone actually say the movie's name out loud at any point other than the end, where it's obvious (well, more obvious) what's going on.

What did I miss? Or is this a Lynchian red herring.

Posted by: Jacktrade at November 17, 2009 4:48 PM

i don't think it's always useful to search for metaphors and symbols. the thing behind winkie's may have meant or represented something to david lynch. but all the surreal and absurd stuff in his movies usually works on an emotional level. i don't think narratives need to have a concrete logic behind them just because they aren't grounded in conventional story terms. maybe everything doesn't have a secret significance that is key to 'getting it.'

i understand wanting to have it all make sense because it's a disorienting movie. but it doesn't necessarily need to be viewed analytically.

or something.

Posted by: shane at November 17, 2009 4:54 PM

Jacktrade, i don't remember them specifically, but i think those 'hints' were a joke.

Posted by: shane at November 17, 2009 4:56 PM

Shane, I dunno...they do actually seem to help (some of them anyway).

I remember using them on my second viewing of it, and they help put the general narrative in better light so I could focus on the details.

Posted by: Jacktrade at November 17, 2009 5:02 PM

jacktrade>> I snagged this from another website. I was waiting for discussion here to pick up, and ended up searching the internet for Mulholland Drive theories...


Can you hear the title of the film that Adam Kesher is auditioning actresses for? Is it mentioned again?

Another hint that we deal with alternate realities.

1. We hear on the set that Adam Kesher is auditioning for the leading role in the "Sylvia North Story" (stagehand announcing: "The Sylvia North Story, Camilla Rhodes, take one." just about when Blond Camilla walks in).

2. This movie title is mentioned again by Diane at Adam's dinner party. Wilkins tells that Bob Brooker directed the "Sylvia North Story" and Camilla was great in it.

Judging from the title, "The Sylvia North Story" is presumably a tragic story of a fallen starlet, for which both Diane and Camilla were auditioning. Irony to their tragic ends.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at November 17, 2009 5:13 PM

Thanks Darth...you da man. That's what I'd been looking for, your 1. moment in the film. I must have missed it...maybe I was expecting Kesher to say it.

Posted by: Jacktrade at November 17, 2009 5:17 PM

Yossarian summed it up exactly how I see it - the movie is Diane's hallucination/dream followed by flashbacks of her life.

To answer a few of the questions:
1. This is the third time I've viewed the movie, and I was bored. The first viewing made me go "WTF?"; the second time some of the pieces fell into place and I could make some (just some) sense of it; but the third viewing seemed to drag on and on and ON. And sometimes I think Lynch is just weird for the sake of being that weird guy who makes movies. It's hard to criticize someone if they're intentionally weird - it's like he's saying, "Your words mean nothing to me because I am BEYOND that! Look how strange and bizarre I am!" And then he tap dances while a midget plays a kazoo. How can you argue with someone like that?

2. Probably doesn't matter, but I think they were meant to be fleshed out in the tv series. But I have nothing to really base that on.

3. I think he had to do something, because it was no longer going to be a tv series, but I think it works for the movie to end with Diane's death.

4. I know!

5. Does he represent some part of Diane's subconscious, moving things along? I don't know.

9. I KNOW!

10. Who doesn't like boobies?
I mean, to be less vulgar, I think it was showing how Diane desired Camilla, plus you could throw in the idea that she desired to BE Camilla as well. It just all came together in one steamy love scene.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at November 17, 2009 5:21 PM

Well, after digesting the comments, I think I will throw my support behind the stalker theory. The part of the film no one has talked about yet is the scene at Silencio, and what all the performances there may mean. The man saying that all the performances aren't real, they are just recordings, and then the singer coming out and moving Betty and Rita to tears, before collapsing and showing that she was lip-synching. But the song affected Betty and Rita like it was real. Does everyone think this sequence is telling us that everything that came before it is a dream?

I think that Lynch was saying that what came after - Diane's flashbacks - are not real. We think of dreams as things our mind makes up, while memories are perceived as recordings playing in our mind. Diane's flashbacks, which she thinks are real, are not. Diane probably did see or meet Camilla at a movie shoot and became obsessed with her. She starts auditioning for every movie Camilla is starring in, getting a bunch of little parts so she can be near Camilla. Her mind makes up all the "memories" of mentoring, sex, and the entire relationship. Those memories, which Diane thinks are real, elicit as much emotion as if they actually happened. When Camilla and Adam date during the latest movie, her mind snaps, driving away her actual girlfriend (the neighbor) and causing her to kill Camilla.

The dream sequence, then, would be an expression of the regret Diane feels from killing Camilla (when she wakes up from the dream, the blue key is already in her apartment, signifying that she knew Camilla was dead before she went to sleep). In the dream, the killer is bumbling, Rita survives the car accident, and through her amnesia forgets her old life of being a whore (for the male Hollywood directors?) and comes to fall in love with Betty, who becomes Rita's best friend, lover, and savior. The blonde wig Rita "disguises" herself with (come on, she looked exactly the same - just blonde) is a symbol of her becoming more like Betty/Diane - a lesbian in love.

Is this comment long enough to submit yet?

Posted by: Three-nineteen at November 17, 2009 6:02 PM

Re the Cowboy, I've always seen him as a plot movement device, in the same vein as his Lynchian predecessor, the Mystery Man in Lost Highway ("No, I'm at your house right now...go ahead and call me.").

It's questionable if people in the movie in the movie even perceive this character. Cowboy interacts really only with Kesher, right? And in Lost Highway, Mystery Man interacts with Bill Pullman and I think Robert Loggia's characters only.

Posted by: Jacktrade at November 17, 2009 6:05 PM

I think the film is about unaddressed mental illness. I don't think Diane dreaming. I think Diane is schizophrenic and she finds comfort in a delusional world...the world we're exposed in the two thirds of the film. Camilla and Betty are just two facets of Diane...two alter egos she bounces back and forth between in a more comforting mental realm.

I think the man behind the dumpster is a homeless schizophrenic; he's the raw, in your face embodiment of who Diane is.

I once read a review that saw the glowing blue box as a symbol for electroshock therapy.

And as far as my limited knowledge of schizophrenia is concerned....I do know one woman, who, when off her meds, once traveled across the country via Greyhound bus because the "little man in her vagina told her to do this". And I have a friend whose mother is schizophrenic and thinks there is a little person living in her refrigerator who occasionally steals her pickled herring. Just bringing this up because of the little old people in the film.

Posted by: Adam at November 17, 2009 6:28 PM

I'll never forget when we saw this in the theater. As it was ending and the credits came up, we hear this man's voice loudly say "That WAS Billy Ray Cyrus!" As if he was wondering that to himself during that part in the movie and it was going to drive him nuts all night if he didn't find out. The excitement and relief in his voice made me chuckle.

As for his role in the film, I thought it was awesomely random and provided an odd sort of comic relief to the audience to give our hard-working brains a break while still feeding the 'WTF' parts of our brain just to mess with us.

Part of me wonders if Diane was maybe a BRC fan or at least familiar enough with him that Billy Ray Cyrus just showed up in her dream as the pool man. Like in dreams where people you know are there but not themselves and he really WAS Billy Ray Cyrus, just not the country singer as people know him. Its Diane's crazy subconscious and in this dream, he is the face of the pool man that Adam's wife cheats on him with. and THATS why he's in this movie throwing everyone off with his out-of-nowhere-ness.

I don't know. Maybe I'm reaching too far and reading too much into it. In fact, I KNOW I am but I thought it was a fun cameo and a funny thought.

Posted by: bubblegumshoe at November 17, 2009 6:32 PM

I absolutely adore this film, and to answer one of Dustin's questions: it's the only Lynch film I can stand. Blue Velvet is terribly overrated, I think, and INLAND EMPIRE (Lynch likes it in all-caps, or so I've heard) is damn near unwatchable (haven't seen any other Lynch films).

For me, Mulholland Drive earns to be as impenetrable as it ends up being, mostly because I don't think it is as batshit crazy as a lot of people think. Maybe it's because it's one of my very favorite films and I've seen it countless times, but I think there's an ultimate method to the madness here. The film is an ode to Hollywood and an ode to stereotype. It plays with genre: Western, drama, melodrama, screwball comedy, slapstick, musical, even "foreign" film in a sense with the Silencio club sequence. I think it's Lynch paying homage to everything and trying to represent every messy part of the Hollywood image in one film.

As for the blue box, I'm tempted to call it a red herring. It's almost too easy to call the key phallic and too easy to say the box is an homage to Alice going down the rabbit hole, or to call the box a representation of Diane's failed dreams or her very literal dream that we've seen played out on screen. When the hobo has the box at the end and the tiny old people run out of it, I think we're seeing Lynch blur the lines between reality and dream worlds. As Diane goes off the rails, so is the movie, ever so slightly. It's the one bit of over-the-top avant-garde-ism that I'll grant Lynch creative leeway. He's in so much control of the bulk of the picture that I have to trust that he of course has a reason here. Hell if I know what it is, though.

As for the sex scene, it ties in with my earlier assertion about Lynch's use of genre (he's tackling pornography here, I think). Not only is he ticking off a genre on his checklist, as well as fully demonstrating Diane's love of Camilla (or, of course, Betty's love for Rita), but he's playing with the trope of the Big Sex Scene. So rarely do we get the big sex scene in a romance between two women, and I think this is simply Lynch turning something else on its head in a subtle yet noticeable way.

As for Billy Ray Cyrus: I think it's another purposeful choice. The gimmicky guest star! It's Lynch's "fuck you" to stunt casting. And in a subtle way, casting an unknown in the very very challenging lead role and having said unknown actress knock it out of the park is a similar "fuck you" to the star system. Billy Ray's place here is Lynch taking his best-known star and putting him in a nothing role. Same with Ann Miller - a legendary actress who is stuck in a minor role as Naomi Watts, a then-unknown gets her actressin' ON.

One last bit: I think the Club Silencio sequence is stunning. Not just for how surreal it is, but also for the thematic work that Lynch does here. The sequence shows the effect that art can have on an audience. Even though Betty and Rita don't speak Spanish (well, Rita kinda does, I suppose), the power of art (in this case, Rebekah del Rio's Spanish-language rendition of Roy Orbison's "Crying") grabs them and elicits an emotional response. They become a physical manifestation of what they are viewing, and in a way, I think the sequence points to the film as a whole. Diane, similar to Betty in this sequence, becomes a part of the seedy Hollywood scene and eventually succumbs to the more sinister side of the town/industry.

What I love most about the film, though, is that even after all this analysis, I haven't even scratched the surface. What of her aunt? What of the Gap ad-from-Hell jitterbug sequence? What of the bizarre psychic next door? There's so much more that hopefully will get covered as this discussion moves along, and that's why it's such a great film. You've only just scratched the surface no matter how long you've picked away at elements of it.

Posted by: whatBENwatches at November 17, 2009 6:58 PM

OK, now I'll try and answer the questions.

1) General impressions -- I really liked it, it's completely insane but even if you don't understand what's going on you can still identify with the characters. You understand their motivations, even if the larger picture is fuzzy.

2) "Nonsense" sequences in Mulholland Dr. -- I think it doesn't matter, all these scenes add to the general sense of creepiness and confusion, which seems to be another theme of the movie (we don't always know why things are the way they are or why we do the things we do). I bet some of them would have been explained in the TV show, but not all.

3) Suicide/dream to end the movie -- I think the suicide was a deliberate decision. The ending, to me, actually is the part of the movie that makes the most sense. Not quite sure what you are talking about with the dream, are you talking about the old couple, which I see as symbolizing cultural norms - attacking her for being a loose-moraled murdering lesbian - or the images and visit to Silencio after the gunshot? I'm not sure I think of that as a dream. Of course, I may not be remembering the ending exactly right - I've only see the movie twice.

4) The diner scene with the nightmare monster. What the hell? -- The only thing I can come up with is that the diner is where Diane supposedly hires the contract killer, so the monster's presence there may represent general evil/ deviation from social norms (again represented by the old couple, who escape the monster and get revenge on Diane)

5) Cowboy - well, the cowboy usually represents America. If we have learned anything in the last decade or so, it's that America is always right. So the cowboy could represent America/ mainstream Hollywood, the "right" way of doing things. If a maverick director wants to do his own thing, he will be punished. Of course, the cowboy is only trying to help the director by telling him what to do, and if the director doesn't follow instructions the cowboy will have to take action.

6) Lynch’s view of the emptiness of Hollywood, and how the gloss and beauty of it (Betty) obscures the ugliness beneath (Diane). -- I actually think pre-amnesia Rita is the embodiment of Hollywood, gorgeous and sophisticated on the surface but underneath just a whore who will do anything for money.

7) How would you place Mulholland Dr. among other Lynch films? -- I haven't seen all of Lynch's films, but it's now my favorite, mostly because I feel I understand it the most thanks to this discussion. Twin Peaks Season 1, however, is better.

8) But why a blue key and a blue box? Is there any significance attached to that? -- Well, with my stalker theory in mind, the box could represent Diane's box, which is blue because Camilla doesn't know she exists and therefore won't have sex with her. (Not really, I have nothing to contribute here.)

9) Billy Ray Cyrus? Really? -- I know, that took me right out of the movie.

10) Finally, what is Lynch trying to say with that extended lesbian scene? -- Which scene are you talking about - the one in the dream or the one in the flashback? I guess my answer is good for both. I didn't think either scene was that long or different from a mainstream sex scene except for the gender of the two participants. If it had been a het sex scene, would you still think it was long or out of place or had deeper meaning? Maybe it's just a scene to represent the feelings the two characters have for each other (or the feelings Diane imagines are there).

Posted by: Three-nineteen at November 17, 2009 7:00 PM

To shane, I agree that it's not always appropriate to find metaphors/symbols/etc. where there aren't any. I think this film works so well because it elicits an emotional response at its base level, but can also be explored endlessly from a thematic/symbolic standpoint. It's like a great poem or other piece of writing that you analyze: even if the author didn't necessarily intend what you end up finding in it, you have to take the work at face value and go from there.

Posted by: whatBENwatches at November 17, 2009 7:05 PM

A couple people have already mentioned that you don't need to worry about knowing what everything means to enjoy this movie. It doesn't need to be a puzzle to solve, it can just be about the emotional response to what is on the screen at any given moment: the powerhouse acting, the dark and unexpected humor, clever irony, or the Badalamenti score and Peter Deming cinematography.

The reason Mulholland Drive is my favorite David Lynch movie is because it has by far the best 'enjoyable scenes to incomprehensible bullshit' ratio. This is a crucial metric for evaluating Lynch. Lost Highway, for example, had a whole lot of incomprehensible bullshit. It also had the creepy-cool Robert Blake scene, the unsettlingly detached Bill Pullman, the scene where Robert Loggia flips out and beats the shit out of a guy for tailgating, etc. Blue Velvet had a lot of random and unpleasant stuff but the opening sequence with the ear is pretty impressive, and Dennis Hopper's ranting and raving (though that is slightly unpleasant, too), and Roy Orbison. For Inland Empire the ratio probably goes negative, way too much bullshit.

I can't argue with the fact that there is some frustrating incomprehensible self-indulgent bullshit in this film. But if you can't sit back and love the hell out of some of the scenes and the performances in this movie, well, I don't know what to say.

- The bumbling hit man in the office building, especially when he drags the fat women out of the office (could it get any worse?) and we see the janitor in the background (it can!) and then his expression when the smoke alarm goes off (priceless!)

- Pretty much everything that Justin Theroux was in. I would trade the lesbian sex scenes for five more minutes with JT. The glasses, the weird affectation of carrying a golf club to a studio meeting, the response to his wife's affair, the meeting with the cowboy

- The cowboy

But also the little things. Tons of little things. The detectives surveying the accident scene ("could be someone's missin"). The big burley mob guy who is looking for Adam Kesher and ends up punching Billy Ray Cyrus and the look on his face after he tenses his fist to knock the psycho woman off his back. That little hesitation when Rita is reading lines with Betty before awkwardly delivering the line "then they'll put you in jail"

Anybody else get that? What were some of your favorite scenes or favorite moments? What stood out? What makes you want to turn to the person next to you and describe it in depth until they feel what you feel?

Posted by: Yossarian at November 17, 2009 7:54 PM

The little moments in this movie I really loved:

- The Pool man scene.

- The cowboy scene. I don't know, I like the way he talked.

- The "This is the girl" audition scene at the studio where Adam spots Betty from across the room.

- pretty much everything Yossarian mentioned. He's said about everything I wanted to say better than I could have said it.

Posted by: bubblegumshoe at November 17, 2009 8:08 PM

My little theory.
Bear with me.


They are in hell.
Their actions through the movie are what get them there and the movie itself is their gradual awful realization of this.

The old folks are the demons who bring them there. The monster and the cowboy are various embodiments of that realization. (ie: 'what you want is now irrelevant')

It's not just one person's hell. It is all hell.

This is not a religious thing for me. I'm not getting all religiousy here.
But there were some 'clues' that led me to think this and it makes the movie make sense for me.

There is one scene that takes place on a street. In the frame is a telephone pole. On that pole is a poster that in fact says 'In Hell'.

Every realization anyone has is a terrifying one. The monster, to me is the 'true' face of the man who tells the story of him. It is himself he sees, without the rose colored glasses of self deception.

Same with the two women. The Silencio scene was another 'clue'for me - nothing here is real. Not just the club, but the whole 'world'. You will never get satisfaction only the endless loop of your life and the stripping away of your illusions.

That is why Diane is so 'ingenue' when she arrives. That is how she sees/saw herself, when she was really quite the opposite. As for the suicide, I saw the scene where they find the dead body as her seeing her own self having killed herself and her realizing where she in fact is.

That's why the old folks come for her at the end. Why they have been there all along. .

I don't see any of this as a stretch.
And forgive me this take on it.

It's not because she is a lesbian. It is about the cruel choices she, and all the rest there have made.

To me, self realization can be the most terrifying thing. When you see you have been an asshole. And that to me is what this movie is, and why it scares the hell out of me (joke unintended) and why I love it so much.

As for BRC, I didn't know who he was so it didn't affect me at all beyond making me laugh.

The blue box? I don't know. Recycling, maybe?

Thanks for letting me drop my two cents in.
Like I said, this take on it is the one that makes the most sense to me.

Posted by: Odnon at November 17, 2009 8:14 PM

These Movie Club discussions should be organized on the site under "Miscellany." I plan on watching this eventually and will probably need to come back here to understand what the hell is going on.

Posted by: Mick J at November 17, 2009 8:21 PM

Damn, I got caught up in a deadline and couldn't make it for the discussion proper. I'm going to watch it tomorrow armed with these new insights, and maybe, MAYBE, I'll finally feel as though I've experienced the film, not just observed it. Now, if only someone could explain Infinite Jest, what the point of expensive umbrellas is, and why men think staring at your tits for the entirety of a 1/2 hour bus ride is an acceptable thing that you won't even notice, then I'd have all the answers in the world.

Posted by: Lauren at November 17, 2009 10:33 PM

What were some of your favorite scenes or favorite moments? What stood out? What makes you want to turn to the person next to you and describe it in depth until they feel what you feel?

The beauty of the cinematography - the long lingering close up shots of Harring and Watts. While watching, I thought they both must be the most beautiful women in existence. In particular, I felt like the camera was constantly focusing in on both women's lips. Maybe that was just me!

I loved when the camera took us behind the dumpster - the pacing and the fear I felt waiting for the monstrous guy. I felt the emotions of many different people both because of the acting and the close-ups and the point of view of the camera.

Posted by: Cindy at November 17, 2009 11:11 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time