film / tv / lists / guides / news / love / celeb / video / think pieces / staff / podcasts / web / politics / netflix / advertise / cbr

Is the TSA a Broad Government Conspiracy to Molest Airline Passengers?

By Dustin Rowles | Miscellaneous | November 23, 2010 | Comments ()

Basically, the new TSA regulations give travelers one of two options: a full-body X-ray scan or a full-body police-style pat down (or both, in some cases), although it is my vague understanding that only a small percentage of airline travelers will have to endure either.

One camp seems to be complaining that the X-ray scans are too invasive (or even dangerous) while the other is claiming that the pat-downs are too invasive. And everyone seems to be complaining that airline security is not safe enough. The ACLU wants to sue. Parody videos are being launched, Tea Party crazies are declaring tomorrow "Opt Out" Day, and they're not trying to opt out of gropes; they're trying to opt out of body scanning. And a sex writer stripped down to her skivvies to mock the invasiveness of the full-body search. Even Jesse Ventura will no longer fly because he feels he's been sexual assaulted (bitch, please. Like anyone would want to fondle you).

Meanwhile, 64 percent of Americans approve of the full body scans and a little less than half approve of the pat-down searches.

Today's Pajiba Debates ask: Do you really care, or is this a media-driven story during a slow news week? And if you do care, why? What is the alternative? And do you really think the TSA is a broad government conspiracy to molest airline passengers under the guise of safety?

Punch-Drunk Love DVD Review | All You Need is Love | Girls who Like Boys who Like Boys | Pajiba Dirty Talk

Bigots, Trolls & MRAs Are Not Welcome in the Comments

A Complete List of Fall TV Premiere Dates

Recent News

Recent Reviews

Privacy Policy