web
counter
 

A Second Case Study in "Hotness"

By Joanna Robinson | Posted Under Miscellaneous | Comments (59)



andrew-garfield-details-magazine-february-2010-03.jpeg

Introduction and Purpose

Last month we, the Scientific Community, brought you “A Case Study in Hotness” in which we examined the magazine photo shoots of two of today’s most dreamiest leading men. “More!” you cried. “Hit us with that steamy science!” (We’re paraphrasing. Obviously you guys would never say “steamy” outside of the sauna.) We rubbed our hands together with glee, donned our lab coats and goggles and perused the magazine racks for some tasty specimens. Our hopes were truly sky high because these editions would be for February. Valentine’s Day! L’amour! Imagine our shock and dismay, Junior Scientists, at the Condé Nasty surprise the glossies had in store for us. So with deep regret we present to you “A Case Study in ‘Hotness’” of the only two coverlads for February 2011.

Hypothesis

Our hypothesis is the same as last time: “A side by side comparison of two radically different specimens of male beauty will yield concrete and empirical conclusions about aesthetics.” This time, however, one of those specimens was created the same year the film Speed was made, so we’re going to try to skirt any actual objectification as it is grossing the Scientific Community out.

Materials

1. The February 2011 copy of “Vanity Fair” featuring Justin “The Haircut” Bieber
2. The February 2011 copy of “Details” featuring Andrew “The Hairstyle” Garfield


Data

Figure 1

justin-bieber-vanity-fair-cover.jpeg

In Fig. 1 our first specimen, young master Bieber, causer of fevers, beams at you blandly while he and his neckwear are rather violently accosted. Either “Vanity Fair” has a series of lipmark rubber stamps, or some unfortunate intern was made to wear a spectrum of lipstick shades (from “Underage Orange” to “This Makes Me Very Uncomfortable Magenta”) and rain kisses upon Young Master Bieber from shoulder to chin. We in the Scientific Community would like to express our genuine concern for Young Master Bieber’s right eyebrow which appears to have been prematurely lopped off, lest it compete with the amber waves of grain that are his meticulously constructed bangs.

Figure 2

Andrew-Garfield-Details-Magazine-Feb.-2011.jpeg

In Fig. 2, the comparatively aged Mr. Garfield, tie unmolested by clutching females, attempts to…scratch his chin? Hide a hickey? Show off his unusual jacket cuff patch? Regardless, Mr. Garfield need not wrinkle his forehead but should be content in the knowledge that his eyebrows will remain unlopped as they are in no way competing with the magnificent upswept crest that are his bangs.

Figure 3

andrew-garfield-details-magazine-february-2010-02.jpeg

What Mr. Garfield loses in coat-and-tie respectability in Fig. 3, he gains in plenty o’ hipster points (“plenty o’” is a highly technical unit of measurement). The Scientific Community awards Mr. Garfield these points based on a) the palpable Eau de American Apparel Ad 2) the deft execution of the meta photograph and iii) the twee and whimsical ye olde timey polaroid camera. Please make note in your lab books, Junior Scientists, that the bang waves are still cresting. May they never break.

Figure 4

Justin Bieber Vanity Fair Magazine February 2011 2 Justin Bieber On Vanity Fair February 2011 Cover Photos.jpeg

Upon examining Fig. 4, the Scientific Community breathes a huge sigh of relief for the fate of Young Master Bieber’s right eyebrow. Much like the noble earthworm, the Bieber Brow, when bise-WAIT A SECOND. BUBBLES? BUBBLES?!?! ARE YOU KIDDING US? YOU WENT WITH BUBBLES? Well that’s it, “Vanity Fair,” you’ve broken science. We hope you’re happy now.

Conclusion

In conclusion we, the Scientific Community, would like to hear no further complaints about the slim-hipped Mr. Garfield as your new Peter Parker/Spiderman. We are confident that if you think about it, Junior Scientists, things could be far, far worse.

Joanna Robinson spared you the one where the kid is nearly shirtless and the one where he’s being molested by the United Colors of Handsetton. You’re welcome.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Mother's Day Promo Trailer | If You Wanna Find Hell With Me, I Can Show You What It's Like | Mother's Day Promo Trailer | If You Wanna Find Hell With Me, I Can Show You What It's Like









Comments

What just happened?

Posted by: zeke the pig at January 21, 2011 10:12 AM

Apparently Pajiba is going the Tiger Beat route that also drove EW straight into a wall of atrocious. Please stop. Or at least provide us straight men folk with gilie pics to distract us until these experiments end.

Also, Garfield looks like Anthony Perkins in that botton picture. Uncannily so.

Posted by: TylerDFC at January 21, 2011 10:19 AM

No.

Posted by: Phedre at January 21, 2011 10:21 AM

Hair bigger than tiny little head? Check

Looks like anorexic Roger Federer? Check

Four foot wide eyebrows? Check

Well pronounced nose that looks like a two lane highway? Check

Never takes a picture in which you can't see his own self-attraction? Check

That's one wacky periodic table.

Posted by: D-Day at January 21, 2011 10:22 AM

No no nononononononono NOOOOOOOOOOO!

Posted by: McSquish at January 21, 2011 10:23 AM

D-Day I think you finally articulated what it is I hate so much about this Bieber kid: He always looks into the camera as if he can't believe how fucking hot he is himself! Arrgh! Hate!

Posted by: Phedre at January 21, 2011 10:27 AM

It is this kind of groundbreaking scientific assessment that leads well-intentioned scientists to imagine a world where people are sown up ass-to-mouth and consider it an improvement upon our own.

Posted by: Fredo at January 21, 2011 10:33 AM

You go ahead and you run with it Phedre!

I was 100% talking about Garfield. Writing about that little never-pubescent rectal boil is beneath me, and I'll be the first person to put myself down.

Garfield looks like the kind of guy who is ALWAYS cheating on you, entirely independent of whether or not said floozy is better looking than you. He'll shoot looks at bar whores when grabbing your drinks, hit on shopgirls whilst you try on expensive shit he has no intention of buying you, and he'll fuck the nanny even when you pick the homeliest woman of the lot. Jude Law pulled this off for years before he became pulled in by the dark matter magnetic attraction of Sienna Miller's vag and came out bald and emaciated.

Posted by: D-Day at January 21, 2011 10:39 AM

Andrew Garfield looks like a hot Hayden Christensen in the header. Like much much hotter.

Posted by: Verity at January 21, 2011 10:41 AM

Was this actually a "confusing your libido" post in disquise? Both of them so-called "hotties" did nothing for me.

Posted by: Sarah at January 21, 2011 10:50 AM

Andrew Garfield, what wouldn't I do to get my hands on your gravity-defying coif? It's like a swirly soft-serve ice cream cone, and I'm powerless against the siren song of ice cream.

Posted by: nosio at January 21, 2011 10:56 AM

Garfield really is interesting looking. He has a brooding man's face coupled with a brooding teenager's body.

Posted by: denesteak at January 21, 2011 10:59 AM

Next Science Topic: Fame: it makes a body brood.

Posted by: Ian at January 21, 2011 11:01 AM

Ewwww. To both. Where the hell are the hot men? You know, the post-adolescent, post-angsty-twenty-something males of the species? Because these children do nothing for me at all.

Posted by: Reba at January 21, 2011 11:22 AM

In the bubble pic, The BieberBoil looks like the "not quite ready for prime time" psycho in Funny Games that got told to wait in the car.

Posted by: Groundloop at January 21, 2011 11:24 AM

Reba, it's not until their 30's that any man can be described as truly hot. These two are both in what can only be described as the embryonic stage, if at all.

Posted by: SittingPat at January 21, 2011 11:39 AM

Reba, Garfield's damn near thirty. He's totally the new Matthew Broderick. He'll be playing a teenager until he gets puffy and balding.

Posted by: Robert at January 21, 2011 11:41 AM

You go ahead and peruse your magazine racks. I'll peruse Brooklyn Decker's rack in the Esquire that arrived yesterday.

(And I don't even think Brooklyn Decker is remotely hot, I'm just willing to give every rack a fair chance.)

Posted by: , at January 21, 2011 11:42 AM

Yeah, they're hot if you're 13 years old.

Posted by: Jadine at January 21, 2011 11:43 AM

The guy who looks like he's achieved puberty is OK. Bieber looks like a girl. Actually, he kinda looks like Hillary Swank in "Boys Don't Cry." Maybe someone should make a Broadway musical of that and he can star in it. Just spitballing here.

Posted by: Slash at January 21, 2011 11:46 AM

My dear Joanna,

Although I applaud your wanting to infuse Pa-hee-ba with eye candy for the womens, I'm not exactly sure that you understood what we meant when we clamored for more hot mens posts.

This bubble gum ish with Baby Bieber and Goofy Garfield is SO not it! They is men children, woman!

I want me nice, broad shouldered, hard bodied hunk of men. Think Leo Dicaprio in "The Departed" or Beckham in his Armani ads. If you really wanna do some science how's about writing an article on the hot bodied men with fug faces who confuse many a women's loins (i.e. Jeremy Renner who has a weird face but a nice enough body to where I wouldn't mind taking him and a paper bag into the nearest available room)? That's a conundrum that needsto be explored.

Nevertheless, I, as a female Pajibite (Pajibans? Pajibette?) applaud this effort.

To the people complaining (I.e. Menfolks) about this post: HEL TO THE NAW. I don't hear any of y'all complaining every time Dustin posts the nth post about Christina Hendricks' bounteous boobs and ass or when we get the latest hottie of the minute post to aid you in your moments of self-lovin.

Joanna is keepin this an equal opportunity objectifying site and I, for one, love it!

Just not so much when it's regarding someone who could easily pass as my 14 yr old brother.

The Bieber Fever, I no haz it.

Posted by: Slappysquirrel at January 21, 2011 11:47 AM

It's "Spider-Man".

Posted by: Jay at January 21, 2011 11:49 AM

Garfield is also just a terrific actor. He's not leading-man handsome yet can play cute or awkward very well. I liked "The Social Network" and he was hands-down the best part of it (though I must admit loving the Winkelvii, also).

Posted by: samantha t at January 21, 2011 11:54 AM

I'm completely comfortable with being the lone Pajiban who finds Andrew Garfield hot.

MORE FOR ME.

(But really, the video of him singing the bed intruder song is all kinds of adorable.)

Posted by: nosio at January 21, 2011 11:55 AM

Nosio, you're not the only one, and I MUST see this video. Where is it??

Posted by: Dorothy Snarker at January 21, 2011 12:00 PM


Bieber looks like an unholy combination of Hillary Swank and Matt Damon, and it is scary.

Garfield is completely cute in a very skinny-nerdy-cool-boy way. He's miles away from my type, but I can appreciate the cuteness, even if I don't want to jump it. That hair is magnificent, though. I wouldn't mind running my hands through it.

You know, for scientific purposes.

Posted by: figgy at January 21, 2011 12:10 PM

I will second the vote for actual Men next time.

And Tyler, you have no right to complain. You got giant Carla Gugino breasts yesterday AND a half naked whomever in last night's PAD.

I keep careful track of these things. It's only fair.

Posted by: figgy at January 21, 2011 12:12 PM

D-Day In defense of noses, I like a well pronounced nose, I think that's what makes a face interesting rather than blandly cute. Garfield has a nose he can ACT with. Also, here is the bed intruder song:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuY92Jwrppg&feature=player_embedded

Posted by: brdkelli at January 21, 2011 12:16 PM

Where is this Carla Gugino?

Posted by: Jay at January 21, 2011 12:19 PM

Oh hang on, that was two days ago. Keep better records!

Posted by: Jay at January 21, 2011 12:20 PM

Ladyboy alert!

Posted by: klingonfree at January 21, 2011 12:29 PM


If at any point you are open to taking suggestions on specimens to put under your uh microscope, methinks you could find a few suggestions among the Women Posters of Pajiba.

Now that would be an excellent comments diversion. I'd be excessively diverted.

Posted by: klingonfree at January 21, 2011 12:32 PM

Dorothy, I am more than happy to pass it along:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuY92Jwrppg

(I'm using my phone so I wasn't able to copy and paste, but if it doesn't work just youtube "Andrew Garfield bed intruder")

Posted by: nosio at January 21, 2011 12:39 PM

WEB OF LIES! There's no hotness here!

Posted by: Chickaboom at January 21, 2011 12:39 PM

the magazine cover with Bieber gives off a really creepy kiddie porn vibe. wtf? isn't vanity fair a magazine that adults read?

Posted by: idleprimate at January 21, 2011 1:09 PM

I know I'm old when 30 year olds look like babies.

Next time I demand the side by side comparison be between Jon "There's a Hamster in my Pants" Hamm and Nathan "Captain Tightpants" Fillion.

Posted by: BWeaves at January 21, 2011 1:09 PM

Idleprimate: agreed. And, God help me, I don't even think that kid is cute and wouldn't have when I was younger. As to Garfield, he was very manly in the British "Red Riding" trilogy. I don't know, I just love that guy.

Posted by: samantha t at January 21, 2011 1:27 PM

Bieber, ugh. STOP EYEFUCKING THE CAMERA, TINY LESBIAN!

Posted by: Craig at January 21, 2011 1:56 PM

My mom bought that Vanity Fair (probably because it had the word "Kennedy" on the cover) and it never occurred to me until now that that wasn't Justin Beiber's own hand pulling on his tie.

Also, his eyebrows look extremely fake.

Posted by: Todd at January 21, 2011 1:57 PM

You're just screwing with us now, aren't you?

Posted by: pickled tink at January 21, 2011 2:01 PM

It is this kind of groundbreaking scientific assessment that leads well-intentioned scientists to imagine a world where people are sown up ass-to-mouth and consider it an improvement upon our own.

Posted by: Fredo at January 21, 2011 10:33 AM

I can't believe no one commented on this comment, because it's pure genius. But it kinda got lost up there.

A variation on "this is why we can't have nice things": This is what makes the Human Centipede look like a good idea.

Posted by: MM at January 21, 2011 2:05 PM

@Slappysquirrel, I'm totally with you.

The Bieber is a KID! Looks like someone who needs a babysitter, not a fan club. And Andrew Garfield? Great actor, likable enough guy, but not hot. Could we get some Armie Hammer up in here? Where's his photo session? How about some Thor-lookin' Chris Hemsworth?

Posted by: Parker at January 21, 2011 2:32 PM

Preach, Bweaves. I too would more than enjoy the scientific appraising of Hamm and Fillion.

All for science. Yes. Science.

I do love some Scarfield though. Something about those eyebrows...the to-the-roof hair...accent. Accent! That's what it is. British accents are like crack to me. I can't be the only one.

Posted by: Rachael at January 21, 2011 3:19 PM

I want a piece of Andrew Garfield. Truth.
He is my kind of hot. I'll take someone who looks like him over someone who looks like Jon Hamm any day.

Posted by: DominaNefret at January 21, 2011 3:34 PM

Andrew Garfield was so irritating in the Red Riding Trilogy. I wanted to punch him in the face through the entire first film, and he wasn't even supposed to be the villain.

Posted by: Hazel at January 21, 2011 3:39 PM

I just watched That Movie About That Website for the first time last night, and I now have a burning, persistent crush on Andrew Garfield.

Posted by: laylaness at January 21, 2011 4:03 PM

The problem with both these guys in relation to "hotness" is that they are both closed- mouth kissing, hand holding, missionary position mamma's boys. They are never going to try to get you in the backseat of your car, pull your hair, or whisper something naughty in your ear. Your dad will LOVE them and you will always know what they are doing on a Saturday night because they will text you their plans before hand. Maybe someday I would want to marry them, but they wouldn't be on my "list". So hot, no. Just a warm snuggie.

Posted by: Ferocious Puppies at January 21, 2011 4:13 PM

They are never going to try to get you in the backseat of your car, pull your hair, or whisper something naughty in your ear.

Ohhhhh, we just need a little of the right encouragement.

Posted by: Jay at January 21, 2011 4:20 PM

The Beeb kinds looks like Julie Andrews circa Sound of Music in the cover pic. Only not as pretty.

Posted by: Kati at January 21, 2011 5:11 PM

Y u no Tom Hardy?

Posted by: Melissa at January 21, 2011 5:56 PM

Nosio and Dorothy, (and others, but it loses the momentum) - sorry, but I believe I called dibs on Andrew Garfield with the phrase "Step aside ladies, I'm gonna make a man outta 'im"

Posted by: Laurie at January 21, 2011 7:18 PM

After ignoring the fetus and passing painlessly through Jailbat Terrace, I'm unloading a large amount of WTFery into Garfield Grotto. This man is a poor lady's Zach Quinto, and I am not even 100% on board with Quinto's sex appeal.

Posted by: Amanda6 at January 21, 2011 7:30 PM

I'll admit the Andrew Garfield confuses me. I went to see The Social Network under duress and ended up enjoying it a lot due in large part to enjoying him a lot.

Wait, that came out wrong.

I feel like I should not find him attractive, but there's something so very breakable-looking about him that I--

Hm. That didn't really make it better, did it?

I'll stop now.

Posted by: elisamaza at January 21, 2011 11:11 PM

Oh, please. Anyone who dares to compare anyone to the Hamm shall get a mighty beating, courtesy of yours truly.

Posted by: Figgy "Bagels" Figarelli at January 22, 2011 1:24 AM

So is this admirable (if you pick other people) scientific study based on this research proposal?

http://www.webcomicsnation.com/shaenongarrity/skinhorse/series.php?view=archive&chapter=45896

Posted by: ChrisD at January 22, 2011 11:00 AM

I don't really get this. Wasn't the outcome a forgone conclusion? I don't think anyone on this site would choose Bieber over this, any other opponent or generally because

A)It strikes me as a violation of Pajiba Cool Kids Codes, or whatever it is always flying around up here,

B)Genuine ignorance and/or dislike of his work, him (is there a childless adult here who can sing his songs?)

C)That's a felony.

So, if someone were to say to me, 'it's either chocolate ice cream or the gibbet', I'd take the chocolate ice cream, even though I hate it. I have nothing against Garfield, but that's a good thing, since the alternative is arrestable.

I have enough reasons to dislike Vanity Fair, but a Miley cover, then a Justin cover in recent memory isn't helping its case.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at January 22, 2011 9:00 PM

At first I thought you meant Andrew Keegan of the 90s or sometime around there. Regardless, my original thoughts still stand; neither one of these people is hot.

Posted by: Poptart at January 24, 2011 9:04 AM

Sorry Joanna, but I enjoyed the comments more than the article :)

Posted by: Diviya at January 25, 2011 5:57 AM

Why does everyone hate Andrew Garfield? I think he's very, very attractive.
I've had a crush on him since Red Riding. Bieber isn't even out of diapers so it's no contest.
It would be more fun to pit Garfield against another sylphish skinny it boy.
And btw, he was so adorable at the GGs I almost died. When he stuck his hands in his armpits on stage and was all awkward I totally giggled in front of my fiance. This prompted eye rolling from him, naturally.

Posted by: ninetwenteetoo at January 25, 2011 9:53 AM