Napoleon-Dynamite-napoleon.jpg

Guides | December 31, 2009 | Comments (91)


I’d originally planned to put together a list of the ten worst films of the decade, before realizing that it was an all but futile endeavor. There are 200 films, easily, that might qualify for the top ten, and there was no way to really put together a list collaboratively, either. We’ve all seen terrible movies, but usually, only the reviewing critic has seen them, so we could hardly get together and debate the merits of Larry the Cable Guy (for the record, I’d have probably named Captivityas the worst of the decade, on account of the fact that it made me angrier than a Bruce Banner backseat hate fuck).

Instead, I thought it’d be more valuable to look at the decade’s most culturally poisonous movies — those films that shifted the Hollywood landscape for the worst, that established negative trends, or that made people that I don’t like happy. Not all of these movies are horrible (though most are); they simply made it possible for more bad movies to exist and helped to lower the collective Hollywood IQ.

high-school-musical.jpg10. High School Musical: Is it criminal to give tween chicklets a little eye candy and some really heinous manufactured pop music? Of course not. As long as it stays where it belongs, on the Disney channel, and away from the rest of us. The problem with High School Musical is that it got too big. It spawned the careers of Ashley Tisdale, Vanessa Hudgins, and Zac Efron. It allowed a bunch of candy-ass teenagers into our multiplexes. And Efron is on the verge of being taken seriously as an actor. We can’t let that happen, folks. And it is thanks, in part, to the success of High School Musical that a Footloose remake is in the works, and that Hollywood saw fit to remake Fame (and, perhaps, the reason why there’s a Saved by the Bell movie in development). But there’s something even more insidious lurking beneath the High School Musical phenomenon , and that’s director Kenny Ortega, who is not only in line to direct Footloose, but also directed Michael Jackson’s concert movie, This Is It. And by direct, I mean: Insert himself obnoxiously into the picture and kiss Michael Jackson’s ass.

napoleon-dynamite.jpg9. Napoleon Dynamite: I didn’t hate Napoleon Dynamite when it was released in the summer of 2004. It was aimless, meandering, and fairly pointless, but it had an unfamiliar quirk about it, and Jared Hess reeled off a few good lines. That is, until six months later, when many of those lines became obnoxiously over-quoted catchphrases that slowly began to replace the Swingers catchphrases that had, at one time, dominated cubicle banter. Exasperated “Gosh!“‘s were passed around like the drunk accountant at the office holiday party, and by the following year, every single morsel of Napoleon Dynamite’s dim originality had been beaten to a pulp by the machinations of pop culture. The unexpected box-office success of Dynamite, moreover, paved the way for years of quirky indie comedies featuring nerdy losers: Eagle vs. Shark, Film Geek, Adventures of Power, and even Hamlet 2. Even good movies — Juno, The Foot-Fist Way, and Kabluey — were being unfairly compared to Napoleon Dynamite, as the movie had somehow become shorthand for indie comedies about pathetic outcasts. Though there have been far too many Napoleon Dynamite-like movies made since 2004, we can at least be thankful that it was something of a one-hit wonder for both the director (Jared Hess) and the actor (Jon Heder), who are both still worm-holing their ways back into obscurity.

300dad.jpg8. 300: Love it or hate it (I’m of neither persuasion, though I lean toward the hate side), Zack Snyder’s 300 has been largely responsible for a whole new brand of motion-picture stylism - it’s really quite unbelievable now how many pitches are now being tossed to studio heads that contain the phrase — “in the style of 300.” Quite frankly, putting aside Snyder’s Watchmen, we haven’t even seen the tip of the iceberg yet, and the influence of 300 is likely to dog us well into the next decade. Here are just a few movies coming out soon, or in development, that are expected to be “in the style of 300: Moby Dick, Moses, Vlad Dracula, Clash of the Titans, Excalibur and War of Gods. It might have been visually stunning the first time around, but let’s at least hope that subsequent movies “in the style of 300” bother to wrap some substance around that visual stylism.

060306_he_POLAR-EXP_Ex.jpg7. The Polar Express: Thanks to success of The Polar Express, which was a very bad movie, by the by, Zemeckis’ motion capture technique has become the technological wave of the future, at least for Zemeckis, who has had enough pull to keep rolling out these ugly-ass mo-cap flicks. Not content to ruin Beowulf and A Christmas Carol with his hideous animation technique, which involves recording movement and translating that movement onto a digital model, we can we look forward to more motion-capture monstrosities in the next decade, including a mo-cap version of Yellow Submarine, The Nutcracker, most likely an adaptation of the Stoneheart Trilogy and yes — a sequel to Roger Rabbit. Thanks, but no thanks, Zemeckis.

the-ring-2002.jpg6. The Ring: Decent movie, actually. But you know what wasn’t good? The Asian horror remakes that followed in its wake: Dark Water, The Grudge and The Grudge 2, The Ring 2, The Eye, Mirrors, Shutter, Pulse, One Missed Call and Bangkok Dangerous. It also launched the career of director Gore Verbinski, who would go on to direct Pirates of Caribbean (Yay!) and it’s two sequels (boo!). Oh, and now he’s remaking The Host (bastard) and Clue (asshole).

diarymadblack.jpg5. Diary of a Mad Black Woman: It’s not like Diary of a Mad Black Woman spawned a new subgenre or anything. What it did was make Tyler Perry the most prolific director in Hollywood — he has become his own subgenre. Thanks to the massive and unexpected success of Diary of a Mad Black Woman, we’ve been treated to two Tyler Perry movies a year for four years, in addition to two television shows with 100-episode commitments. Tyler Perry is an industry, and that industry is facile African-American dramas replete with racial stereotypes, contrived situations, rampant misogyny, come-to-Jesus exhortation, and another fucking black man in a gender reversal fat suit, because that never gets old. They’re phony, infantile movies that actually exploit Christianity for cash. Tyler Perry relies too much on broad, crude comedy; he’s a misogynistic egoist; he’s entirely too melodramatic; his Christian messages are too heavy-handed; and he’s a poor writer, a hack director, and a terrible actor, to boot. But thanks to Diary of a Mad Black Woman, we’re going to get a semi-annual opportunity to watch his movies for years to come.

tcm-2003-leatherface.jpg4. The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: There’d been a few horror remakes before Michael Bay’s The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, but this is the movie that found the formula for disposable horror remakes that would dominate the rest of the decade. Take an ’80s horror title, throw in some forgettable teenage meat, cut them up, and voila: You’ve got yourself a $35 million dollar opening weekend on a $20 million budget. In fact, Texas Chainsaw Massacre made over $100 million worldwide on less than a $10 million production budget. So, it was only inevitable that we’d see in the coming years remakes of Halloween, My Bloody Valentine, House of Wax, The Amityville Horror, Friday the 13th, The Omen, When a Stranger Calls, The Hills Have Eyes, Last House on the Left, The Fog, The Uninvited, The Hitcher, Black Christmas, and Sorority Row. Thanks, Michael Bay!

twilight1asdfadf.jpg3. Twilight: The essence of why Twilight has been culturally noxious was demonstrated a few months ago on our Seriously Random List of The 11 Reasons Why the Twilight Phenomenon Scares the Living Shit Out of Me. But it’s not just the feral, giggling teenage mall goth girls waving around their virginity like a lasso, but something far worse: Twilight Moms — crazy ladies living out some misguided wet teenage fantasy, often through their own daughters. But the Twitards and their Moms, who think that Stephenie Meyer is the motherfucking Charles Dickens of the 21st century, are just half the cultural damage that Twilight has wrought. It’s also spawned an entire market of trashy vampire and werewolf novels, “True Blood,” “Vampire Dairies,” and seemingly dozens of movies now in production about vampires, werewolves, and whiny fucking teenage girls being fought over by vacuous pretty boys. With New Moon succeeding to the tune of $270 million and counting, and two more sequels in the works, the damage isn’t done yet. We could be feeling the effects of Twilight for another decade to come.

00012855.jpg2. Saw: The original Saw had some modest entertainment value, mostly for its ability — at the time — to make you wriggle in disgust. But I daresay, nothing good has come from Saw’s wake, and way too much has come from it. I speak of the entire torture porn genre, which thankfully (but for the Saw series) has mostly flamed out. But before it did, we were introduced to entirely too much sadistic horror. Eli Roth has, so far, built a career out of it. And we also have Saw to thank for Captivity, I Know Who Killed Me, Turistas, Rob Zombie’s films, and even The Passion of the Christ. So, thanks for that, James Wan.

transformers-megan-l.jpg1. Transformers: Ah, Michael Bay again! The first Transformers wasn’t hideous. It was mildly enjoyable for what it was — a bunch of robots beating the shit out of each other in such a way that nobody could tell what the hell was going on. But it is thanks to that film’s huge $700 million in box-office receipts that our childhoods are being poked, diddled, molested, punctured, and raped. You can thank Transformers not just for its monstrously awful, bloated sequel, but for G.I. Joe, and for half of the next decade’s slate of movies based on toys or board games. Here’s just a sampling of what we have to look forward to in the next few years because of Transformers: Movies based on Monopoly, Risk, Battleship, Stretch Armstrong, Clue, Bazooka Joe, Ouija, Candy Land, Barbie and even a Viewmaster movie. Yes — a movie based on a Viewmaster! And these aren’t small movies for niche audiences — they’re massively budgeted, blockbuster spectacles that will crowd out everything else in the summer. Because it won’t be just Risk and Monopoly. It’ll be Risk II and Monopoly III competing with a fourth and fifth Transformers movie. It’s terrible board game and toy adaptations for years, maybe even decades, to come. And if that’s not bad enough, we have Transformers to thank for Megan Fox.


The Best Action Flicks of the Aughts | The Best Films of the Decade







Comments

Hmmm...comments were turned off. Sorry about that, folks. Comment away!

Posted by: seth at December 18, 2009 2:39 PM

So you write this comment "Exasperated “Gosh!“‘s were passed around like the drunk accountant at the office holiday party," and then complain about Tyler Perry's "rampant misogyny"? Is that hipster irony or something?

Posted by: Erm at December 18, 2009 2:42 PM

commenting...away!
I think that both Twilight and Napoleon Dynamite are more culturally poisonous than Transformers. People underestimate the merits of that franchise. It had wicked cool robots! OK, that's about the only merit I can come up with, but still. The Michael Bay Optimus Prime is awesome. Balance that against a franchise that's infected readers and viewers alike...

Posted by: esme at December 18, 2009 2:43 PM

I appreciate that you bothered to add lists of mock-ups and imitators for each movie. It's easy to say, "Transformers is negatively influential," but siting G.I.Joe as an example of how is really quite damning.

I heart you.

By that I mean that I want to fuck you in the heart.

Just kidding. I want to MAKE LOVE to you in the heart.

Posted by: superasente at December 18, 2009 2:45 PM

Well the drunk accountant isn't necessarily a woman so who's a mysogynist now? Or maybe you're an accountasist? I don't even know what that is, leave me alone, I'm all hopped up on cold meds.

Posted by: JenVegas at December 18, 2009 2:45 PM

I thought the robot fight scene on the overpass was a lot like the iron man fight scene on the overpass, so maybe something good came out of the transformers influence.

The robot fight scene on the overpass was better. I'm pretty sure more stuff got destroyed.

Posted by: Erm at December 18, 2009 2:48 PM

I like this better than a list of the worst movies. It's much more thoughtful.

I will restate that Juno is rightfully compared to Napoleon Dynamite because the guy in that science lab scene is a blatant ripoff of Napoleon Dynamite.

Posted by: becks at December 18, 2009 2:48 PM

"300", sure, but let's not forget "Sin City". It's not just that it led to "The Spirit" but a whole vague slew of self-serious, style-over-substance, comic-y, pre-fab cult movies marketed directly to internet fanboys.

Posted by: D1077 at December 18, 2009 2:49 PM

Get ready to add Avatar to this list.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at December 18, 2009 2:49 PM

"Well the drunk accountant isn't necessarily a woman"

Then maybe it was hipster misandry.

Posted by: E at December 18, 2009 2:49 PM

This whole list is spot-on. I really liked Napoleon Dynamite

What makes me sad is that some of the movies that copied one from the list could have been great movies if they weren't trying so hard to be like something else. I'm thinking of Beowulf, which could've been amazing if the shitty CGI didn't look so goddamn creepy and wrong. Just uncanny valley shit.

This whole list is very, very right (and smart and clever), and very very depressing.

Posted by: figgy at December 18, 2009 3:03 PM

So you write this comment "Exasperated “Gosh!“‘s were passed around like the drunk accountant at the office holiday party," and then complain about Tyler Perry's "rampant misogyny"? Is that hipster irony or something?

I was going to say something about your assumption that the drunken accountant is a woman, but...nah.

Posted by: figgy at December 18, 2009 3:09 PM

While I agree that 90% of the horror movie remakes are garbage, I rather enjoyed both The Last House on the Left and The Hills Have Eyes.

Both torture porn? Sure. But they were at least well done torture porn.

Oh, and Dawn of the Dead! Also, a worthy remake (although not better than the original in this case).

Posted by: Colin at December 18, 2009 3:13 PM

A list I have zero argument with. In fact reading through it made me start ranting to myself several times.

I actually really liked The Ring and Saw but the Japanese remakes that came after they saw one was successful was just horrendous. And as for the Saw franchise... just ugh. As I said I thought the first one was pretty interesting and I went to see the 2nd one in theaters and remember thinking "what kind of fuckery is this?!" They traded a semi-intelligent concept for the usual 'more blood + shocking death= great movie!' formula. assholes.

Also I remember the first time I saw a trailer for Transformers 2 and the first shot is of Megan Fox leaning over a motorcycle lisping and showing copious ass cheek. I initially thought it was another of the spoof movies mocking Michael Bay for his ridiculous style... nope it was just Michael Bay.


Oh and another fuck you to The Polar Express for completely ruining one of my favorite childhood books. I got smart after that and refused to watch shit like Horton Hears a Who


/rant over. phew, i feel better!

Posted by: Even Stevens at December 18, 2009 3:19 PM

Shouldn't Twilight be number one since it is still going strong where Saw and torture porn in general is in decline? Also, Twilight is based on a book, which gives it more cultural credibility to the intellectually devoid, you the kind who think reading a book - ANY book - makes one smart.

Twilight is poisonous to both both film and literature. These twitards have now invaded Barnes & Noble, a place where I used to like spending time.

Posted by: Jeff at December 18, 2009 3:21 PM

Thank you! A list I can identify with. Pretty spot on. May I also add:

* The Hangover - Cheap and easy jokes that many found "edgy" for some reason. Will spawn a thousand imitators.

* Star Trek - Omigod, a "good" reboot! Critically and commercially successful! This validates everything we've ever wanted to do! Everything must be rebooted! Younger! Cuter!!!

* The Matrix franchise - Cathartic violence and philoso-babble do not make a great film. Nor do obviously fake special effects. Nor does a premise that is wholly unoriginal to those of us who read science fiction.

Posted by: Bluesilver at December 18, 2009 3:23 PM


a bunch of robots beating the shit out of each other in such a way that nobody could tell what the hell was going on.

Oh, good - it wasn't just me. I can't tell what the hell is coing on.
~

Posted by: Meander at December 18, 2009 3:25 PM

I have absolutely no comment on this list except to show my former teen girl geekery and point out that The Vampire Diaries, the book series that's surprisingly pretty decent (not the TV show that blows donkey balls, or the new "The Return" sequels that are coming out now over a decade after the fact, and are AWFUL), predates Twilight by a good 15 years. The Vampire Diaries books were originally published in 1991 or so and we're all frankly baffled that LJ Smith hasn't sued Stephenie Meyer's pants off by now.

But you have Twilight to blame for the shit-tastic cliche- and sex-ridden CW show that shares only the title and a few character names in common with the books, so that point still stands. That never would've happened otherwise. Bah.

Disgruntled semi-fan of the original Vampire Diaries books (I liked most of LJ Smith's other YA books WAY BETTER, even though rereading them as an adult I was all like "Man, was the dialogue this cheesy the first time or did my copies of the book rewrite themselves?") over and out.

Posted by: Nat Kittyface at December 18, 2009 3:26 PM

Bluesilver, you'd have to blame Batman Begins for the reboot trend.

Posted by: Jeff at December 18, 2009 3:28 PM

I wish there was room for that Alvin & the Chipmunks crap. I never saw it, but the trailer scarred me for life. Speaking of which, Human Centipede??? Hey, another P-List category: Top Ten Trailers that Scarred Pajibans for Life. Also, there should be punishments for the overlords who posted them.

Posted by: Cindy at December 18, 2009 3:29 PM

I also like this idea for a list as opposed to a "Worst Movies" list, as that seems way more subjective.

I think I'd disagree with the inclusion of Napolean Dynamite, not because I love that movie and think it's a brilliant satire of the John Hughes oeuvre, but because I've never heard of any of the movies you cited as its spawn (ok, I've heard of Hamlet 2, but was that an offshoot of ND? Really? and Juno, which I would never have compared to ND at all, or even thought to, because really?).

I might also disagree with The Ring, only because i think it led a lot of people to seek out the original Japanese versions of the movie, and to more people embracing J-Horror. I would never have discovered Audition or Tomie without The Ring.

P.S. I think I'm over Twilight hate/backlash. Go figure.

Nicely done, ladies and/or gentlemen.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpuppet at December 18, 2009 3:38 PM

So who do we blame for shaky-cam?

Cindy, I think Alvin and the Chipmunks could be blamed on...Transformers, maybe, though I'm thinking that Garfield came out a while ago and it's spawned all those hideous live-action-with-CGI-critters movies. So, damn you to hell, Garfield.

Posted by: figgy at December 18, 2009 3:43 PM

Hee! Nat K, I thought that too.. Diaries and True Blood (or, rather, the Charlaine Harris novels that it's based on) are both pre-Twilight, no? and really, don't we have Buffy and Angel to blame for the current onslaught of teen-vampire fiction, while we're at it?

Wait, no. No. I blame Fox for canceling them. If they hadn't canceled, then we'd still have GOOD teen-vampire fiction, rather than crappy watered down stuff. Or, at least, we'd have the choice.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpuppet at December 18, 2009 3:43 PM

BOW to your Sensei!!!!!

Posted by: Courtney at December 18, 2009 3:49 PM

Great list. I know there's a lot of love for Michael Bay around here, but the horror/torture porn trend has got to be the worst.

Posted by: Mick J at December 18, 2009 3:53 PM

Just haaaad to shoehorn Napoleon Dynamite in one of these lists, didn't ya. Listen, I don't want to be the captain of the NP love-cruise, but seriously... I'd much rather sit through a dozen NP knock-offs than a dozen knock-offs of any of the other movies on this list. NP has not spawned nearly the amount of crap that they have, either. Isn't paving the way for quirky indie comedies a good thing?

As for annoying catchphrases... It's just part of being popular and funny. Don't hate the playa, Dustin... hate the game.

Posted by: logar at December 18, 2009 4:04 PM

The rest of the list is spot-on, though. I weep for the future.

Posted by: logar at December 18, 2009 4:05 PM

Why are there no "romantic comedies" on this list? You have 3 entries that represent "horror," but none that represent the horror that is Hollywood's idea of both romance and comedy, fused into an abomination more disturbing than "The Human Centipede" and more retarded than "Jersey Shore"?

Posted by: Slash at December 18, 2009 4:06 PM

I actually blame Harry Potter for Twilight, but more from a literary point of view. J.K. Rowling paved the way for mediocre writers with a seed of a good story to plant that seed and cultivate it into a clumsily-written juggernaut series that an undiscerning t(w)een audience would devour. The landscape of children's/young adult lit just got bleaker.

And I think Saw should be at the top of the list -- torture porn is the biggest cinematic blight of the Aughts, IMO.

Other than that, I loved this list and nodded vigorously whilst reading it. I thought it was really astute how you chose movies that spawned crappy trends instead of just the resulting dreck that followed it. I thought it was an insightful list. Well done!!

Posted by: Jelinas at December 18, 2009 4:06 PM

Really? Michael Bay is worse than torture porn?

Yes, he is a d-bag who hates women, but his misogony makes him put hot (albeit, intensely annoying) women in glitter bikinis and makes them glisten. Eli Roth cuts women's body parts off.

Dustin, go back and read your captivity review again. That kind of anger, disgust and rage was a direct product of Saw. Transfomers made you make penis jokes. Not quite the same thing.

More importantly, Transformers isn't new cultural poison, it is the blockbuster. Yes, they showed there is a market for making blockbusters about toys, but I hardly think that is any worse than making blockbusters about freaking tree aliens. Or blockbusters about terrorists. They are all the same. Who cares where they get the "source" material from?

Also, 10 bucks says that 12 year old Dustin would have LOVED to play with Megan Fox over his transformer doll.

Posted by: "luker" the barbarian at December 18, 2009 4:09 PM

Great list. There's only one real GLARING omission:

Scary Movie.

It has spawned countless amounts of parody movies that aren't real parodies and all have the god awful name _____ Movie attached to them. Except recently when they try and mask their crappiness by using titles like Dance Flick an Meet the Spartans.

Posted by: Littlejon2001 at December 18, 2009 4:10 PM

Nat K. asked we're all frankly baffled that LJ Smith hasn't sued Stephenie Meyer's pants off by now.

Because you can't copyright an idea. The idea of "100+ year old vampire falls in love with a mortal teenage girl" is free for anyone to take and play with as they choose. If SMeyers had lifted portions of dialogue, blow-by-blow events or narration from the LJ Smith novels, then there would be grounds for a lawsuit. But the idea itself belongs to no one.

Posted by: minorblue at December 18, 2009 4:16 PM

So who do we blame for shaky-cam?
Posted by: figgy at December 18, 2009 3:43 PM

The Bourne series, especially the third. I wonder how much shakier they can get on the fourth.

Posted by: Brenton at December 18, 2009 4:18 PM

Hey Erm, not to be that guy but re: your "hipster irony" comment...I didn't see anything that denoted the drunk accountant was male or female...so please...shut the fuck up and save your trolling for the important threads...namely those involving Twilight.

Posted by: PissBoy at December 18, 2009 4:27 PM

Littlejon2001: My God man! you're so right. Scary Movie should be near the top of this list, hands down.

Posted by: logar at December 18, 2009 4:32 PM

Americans LOOVE their junk food.

So rails the modern-day Patrick Henry (Screen handle abbreviated to PatHen): "Give me substanceless filler or give me DEATH!"

Posted by: Recondite at December 18, 2009 4:50 PM

I believe shaky-cam was popularized by The Blair Witch Project, which is a year too old for this list.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at December 18, 2009 4:52 PM

Was Scary Movie made in the Aughts? IMDB will know.

*consults oracle*

It was made in 2000. I agree. Glaring ommision.

Posted by: superasente at December 18, 2009 5:13 PM

"and now he’s remaking The Host (bastard) and Clue (asshole")

what WHAT WHAT!!!???

A CLUE REMAKE?? WHY? WHAT FOR? IT WAS PERFECT THEN AND IT'S PERFECT NOW AND NEEDS NO MODERN-DAY FUCKERY. I DEMAND ANSWERS. NO, MY CAPS LOCK IS NOT STUCK I JUST CAN'T STOP YELLING RIGHT NOW AND MY KIDS ARE CRYING AND MY DOG WON'T COME OUT FROM UNDER THE CHRISTMAS TREE AND THANKS A LOT I HATE YOU, HOLLYWOOD.

Posted by: MELLA GODDAMMIT!! at December 18, 2009 5:14 PM

Fuck, does that feel like a million years ago to anyone else?

Posted by: superasente at December 18, 2009 5:14 PM

Remaking Clue? As someone that can quote that movie line-for-line, I am terrified. Time to Google.

Posted by: joe at December 18, 2009 5:17 PM

I have two bones to pick with you on this list, good sir.

1) The Texas Chainsaw Massacre was not a 1980s film, as you implied. It came out in 1974 and it already started decreasing it's credibility with awful sequels long before the mediocre remake.

2) Saw is not a torture porn film. I believe your claim of Saw leading to knock off torture porn is ill-founded in that the gore in Saw is implied, not shown. You and many others may falsely remember a saw blade going through an ankle or an obese man ripped apart on barbed wire, but it wasn't shown. Shawnee Smith's scene is the goriest in the film, and it's mostly her reaction shots and some post-death gore. If anything, Eli Roth is responsible for that garbage. Cabin Fever led to Hostel, which was hyped to high heaven because Quentin Tarrantino had a hard on for the mediocre first film.

Furthermore, Rob Zombie's House of 1000 Corpses came out a full year and a half before Saw. After it was surprisingly successful enough, Zombie got to work on a sequel. There is no connection to Saw there.

Same with The Passion of the Christ. I doubt Mel Gibson saw an advanced screening of Saw and changed his film in response to something that didn't come out until 8 months later.

I don't mind bashing horrible horror films. I do it myself. I do mind when people don't even get their facts straight and claim a film that came out after worse films somehow inspired the worse films to be made. Last I checked, October 2004 is after February 2004 (The Passion of the Christ), September 2003 (Cabin Fever), and April 2003 (House of 1000 Corpses). Maybe Saw was responsible for some of the others, but not these.

Posted by: Robert at December 18, 2009 5:27 PM

Speaking of which, Human Centipede???

Posted by: Cindy at December 18, 2009 3:29 PM
----------------------------------------------------
Yesssss?

Posted by: Human Centipede at December 18, 2009 5:51 PM

Robart you're missing the point.

I'm sure we can agree that Saw, though a tense, psychological thriller independently, spawened a series of torture porn sequels.

Hollywood didn't play off the movie Saw -- they built off the Saw franchise. And unfortunatley, that franchise took a turn towards graphic violence and retarded plots -- irregardlessly of the fact that the first movie was very different.

Certainly there were other movies that displayed graphic violence prior to Saw -- just as there will be graphically violent movies in the future that aren't stylelistically similar to Saw at all. Saw isn't responsible for violence in cinema -- it is responsible for a series of gritty, violent films that follow along a similar style. Hostel. Captivity. Turistas.

The point is not that violence in cinima is Saw's fault. No one has said that. The criticism is how Saw inadvertantly produced a series of poorly written, disgustingly bloody, torturous movies.

I know it hurts to face it -- but YES, sometimes a good movie can inspire horrible imitators.

Posted by: superasente at December 18, 2009 5:52 PM

That's right. I said "irregardlessly."

Posted by: superasente at December 18, 2009 5:53 PM

littlejon2001: I would contend that the Scary Movie franchise was inspired by a trend that started all the way back in 1980 with Airplane!

Still, nice catch; I didn't even think about that.

Posted by: Jelinas at December 18, 2009 5:54 PM

Because you can't copyright an idea. The idea of "100+ year old vampire falls in love with a mortal teenage girl" is free for anyone to take and play with as they choose. If SMeyers had lifted portions of dialogue, blow-by-blow events or narration from the LJ Smith novels, then there would be grounds for a lawsuit. But the idea itself belongs to no one.

Posted by: minorblue at December 18, 2009 4:16 PM

Well, see, LJS's lawyers were about to sue the Hex people a few years ago because there were some surface similarities to her series "The Secret Circle," SURFACE SIMILARITIES ONLY, so my comment was more bafflement on the part of the fans that her lawyers would almost go (they pulled back at the last minute) after something that's really NOT the same thing at all but not jump at the chance to drum up publicity for her by going after Twilight.

Posted by: Nat Kittyface at December 18, 2009 5:56 PM

Nice job, Rowles. I probably would have put Saw at #1 and Tyler Perry's inane shit at #2, but overall was a great substitute for a 'Worst of' list.

Sidenote: Your review for Captivity was outfuckingstanding, and for me is the single most memorable post on this site ever. So, thanks for that man!

Posted by: Cruise at December 18, 2009 6:10 PM

Twilight should be #1. That is all. Now I must apply some glitter and go play baseball before the sun goes away. It's all the rage!!!

Posted by: Peanut_Butter_And_James at December 18, 2009 6:11 PM

There has been no more "culturally poisonous" film in the last decade than Juno. To make such a list and not include it, shows how up the ass of that shitty/over-rated movie this site is. I throw up in my mouth a little whenever I think of that waste of celluloid.

Posted by: Jason at December 18, 2009 6:31 PM

Vampire *Dairies*? I hope that's not a typo. I might actually enjoy a movie about vampire cheesemakers. Or, possibly a movie about... uh... milking vampires? The possibilities are endless.

Posted by: Osomatic at December 18, 2009 6:37 PM

I know we're not supposed to rail on advertisers or anything...

but WHAT THE FUCK is up with the dumbass goddamn pop video that keeps playing? Dunno who that big-faced bitch is, but I already hate her and her notion of music.

She make me have the murderface.

Posted by: PissBoy at December 18, 2009 6:37 PM

Boom.

Nice.

Posted by: ChristianH at December 18, 2009 6:44 PM

"But it’s not just the feral, giggling teenage mall goth girls waving around their virginity like a lasso..."

Best. Review. Line. Ever. Dude you made me spit. LOL!

Posted by: la chica at December 18, 2009 7:04 PM

Yeah, I think that the review for Captivity was what made me fall in love with this place. I hadn't been around long but I read that and just...damn. The anger. The righteous fury. It was magnificent.

Posted by: figgy at December 18, 2009 7:09 PM

hamlet 2 was good - i crawled to a theater mortally hungover, dreaming of margaritas and salsa and salt if i could just make it to 3 o'clock or so, and i actually laughed out loud, several times, eyeballs scraped out, human speech foriegn

Posted by: furtherbeyond at December 18, 2009 8:28 PM

Anna

Buffy and Angel were never on Fox, but on the WB and then UPN (for BtVS. Buffy ran for seven seasons and Angel for five, so they weren't exactly nipped in the bud.

Go ahead and remake Clue. The first one wasn't any good anyway.

Posted by: alone in the dark at December 18, 2009 9:22 PM

Wouldn't feel like Pajiba if someone didn't piss on JK Rowling.

Posted by: Jay at December 18, 2009 9:25 PM

However, she did admit that Buffy is to blame for everything.

YOU CAN'T TAKE IT BACK! YOU PUT IT OUT THERE!

Posted by: Jay at December 18, 2009 9:26 PM

What about Blue Collar Comedy Tour? I suppose it wasn't in theaters. Whatever.

Posted by: ChristianH at December 18, 2009 9:40 PM

Posted by: Human Centipede at December 18, 2009 5:51 PM

*shivering under the table*

No wait!

*running*

Posted by: Cindy at December 18, 2009 10:03 PM

Great list in general but can we make a belated edit and replace HSM with Scary Movie?

Your reasoning is that HSM has become too big, but aside from Efron who exactly has been dominating the multiplexes? And the jury is still out on Efron. He has shown signs of competence in Hairspray and reportedly in a biopic (I can't be bothered to look up the title). At one time we might have said the same things about Depp after Jump Street that you're saying about Efron. Just saying to hold off for now, he is still young. As to the poisonous trends HSM has spawned, only Fame has been released. The rest of the "trend" is in development. We expect, but don't know, the forthcoming wave will be shitty. Finally there is one very welcome child that can be directly traced to HSM: Glee.

Posted by: ed newman at December 19, 2009 12:49 AM

Twilight begat True Blood? I think not. Twilight was published in 2005; The "Sookie Stackhouse" novels (Dead Until Dark, Dead in Dallas, etc.) began coming out in 2001, thank you very much. And before you scoff all over them -- read them. They're SO much more than the series has become. Not that the series SUCKS (so to speak)... it's simply nowhere near the quality of the novels on which it is based.

But Puh. Leeze. -- Stephenie Meyer did NOT inspire Charlaine Harris. (And where is the goddamned A in her name? Who the fuck decided to spell it S-t-e-p-h-e-n-i-e? What the fuck?)

Anyway -- I decided I couldn't look down my nose at the Twilight series until I -- gulp -- actually read it. So I hightailed it to the library and checked out the entire damned series and read all 4 fucking books in the course of 6 days, and now I can say it -- it's okay storytelling, badly written, with a HORRIFYING theme.

The vampire craze? Well, I'll leave the analysis of that for another day, or someone's senior thesis. I have my thoughts, but I'm tired.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at December 19, 2009 1:05 AM

Also, I'd just like to say... Fuck Robert Zemeckis, and may every print of The Polar Express burn in hell.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at December 19, 2009 1:09 AM

If I can be a butthole for a moment, I think a distinction should be made as to movies that poisoned our culture versus movies that were poisoned by our culture.

Saw poisoned our culture, but our culture poisoned Napolean Dynamite.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at December 19, 2009 1:32 AM

I love how Bangkok Dangerous somehow got shoehorned into the list of shitty Asian horror remakes. That makes me giggle.

I agree with everything on that list. Not because I disliked it but because it's true. A few points:

- I'd blame Gladiator more than 300 for the historic remake craze. Thanks to Scott and Crowe and winning a bunch of Oscars, everyone jumped right back into that boat. And gave us Troy, Kingdom of Heaven and the other ones listed. Not to mention, extended the career of Orlando Bloom. And here come the culprits remaking Robin fuckin' Hood.

- How the Movie Movie shit wasn't here I don't know. Pajiba be slippin', yo.

Posted by: Fredo at December 19, 2009 2:31 AM

may every print of The Polar Express burn in hell

Burning the prints won't take the movie out of existence. You have to wipe all the drives it was captured to and their backups.

Posted by: HappyGobo at December 19, 2009 3:41 AM

This is the first list I agree with wholeheartedly, although I'd change the order of some of these movies, putting Twilight at number one because I find it so irritating. Well done on the list though.

Posted by: barf at December 19, 2009 10:20 AM

I'd bet that Scary Movie definitely would have appeared on the list had Dustin thought of it.

I really enjoyed Napoleon Dynamite and I thought it was in the exact same 'quirky but touching' vein as Juno or Little Miss Sunshine. I assume it doesn't get any respect because it doesn't have a big serious point to make but I didn't really find it meandering. I thought it was a pretty clear story about a band of misfits trying to find a place in the world. I think it pulled it off beautifully too because I was truly touched when all the characters got something good in the end for committing to the things they loved no matter what anyone said or how scared they were. It was hilarious and sweet and had a lot of style and originality and I honestly don't understand why some people hate it so much. Then again some people hate Juno too so I guess they just hate quirky nerds.

Posted by: becks at December 19, 2009 10:37 AM

Maryscott, We don't see you around here enough from my POV.

Posted by: , at December 19, 2009 10:58 AM

Hang out with teenage girls for a while and you will understand why the Twilight books are so successful. I have been in twelfth grade since 1993 (as a teacher, not as a student, ha!). Though fashion has changed a lot over the years, their innate desire to be loved and feel special never changes. Never. Their hang-ups and drama hasn't over time, either. They just have more opportunities and technolgy to torment one another and feel more isolated.

That being said, the Twilight moms: they are just overgrown teenage girls who are still having some of the same recurring issues and self-worth dilemmas they were experiencing in high school. Many of them were children having children and it is something they can share with their daughters.

I see it all the time in parent/teacher conferences. I figure it all out when I meet mom (or dad) the first time. Oooooh, now I get it why little Sally acts this way......

Absentee fathers and that girl's search for validation in a male, that adds to the pot as well.

Bella is that girl: her parents are divorced. Even thoughshe lives with her dad, She has no real connection to him. Her mother remarries and focuses on that husband. Bella continually doubts her own talents and self-worth, questioning what makes her so desirable to Edward. She whines and complains and has to be saved.

Regardless of the feminist movement and all types of social advances, a large number of girls STILL want that fairy tale: I'm special to him, he loves me, he saves me, and we live happily ever after FOREVER!!!

For many, that ending never comes. Wow, I could write a dissertation about this, but I'm sure it's way too boring.

Posted by: Goddess at December 19, 2009 1:29 PM

superasente, I did say Saw was partly responsible. And as an avid horror fan, I probably could name 50 films off the top of my head that inspired awful films. Saw is one of those. That's not my issue.

My issue was two-fold: Saw was (again) misqualified on this website, a constant problem; also, at least half of the films he blamed Saw on came out before Saw, not after. Meaning his evidence is flawed and innacurrate. Again. Because he hates Saw. And modern violent horror films that came out around the same time and afterwards. Because of the Saw hatred. Which is ridiculous. The Godfather doesn't suck because The Godfather III is pretty awful and the original inspired other less successful mob films; same applies here.

Posted by: Robert at December 19, 2009 1:33 PM

i loved blue collar comedy tour I've even gone to see Jeff Foxworthy in person.
Napoleon Dynamite made me feel a little bit embarrassed but it grew to some popularity.

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at December 19, 2009 2:06 PM

I think I am actually suffering from some kind of psychotic break these days...I make it through the first 10 or 12 posts and if BSlim hasn't weighed in with something, then this thread is dead to me.

Posted by: brite at December 19, 2009 2:28 PM

A definite 'hats off' anyone who actually checks out the source material before launching into a hatred rant.

Man, do I ever hate my life right now.

As you were.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at December 19, 2009 2:29 PM

Laurell K Hamilton's Anita Blake books are the inspiration for the latest vampire trend. From Twilight to True BLood, they all owe a huge amount to Hamilton. Who started a vampire based series without a lot of romance, and had it turn into a sex fest over the years.

Posted by: Paul D at December 19, 2009 4:04 PM

I’d originally planned to put together a list of the ten worst films of the decade, before realizing that it was an all but futile endeavor.

For the last time, Dustin, nobody gives a shit how accurate your "Decade" lists are. All anyone wants is to see a general picture of what you think so they can complain that you didn't include Juno or Kangaroo Jack or a Ben Affleck movie on your list.

We're fine with inaccuracies every now and then, we just want to complain every once in awhile. We just want to see your hatred, no matter if it isn't the most accurate.

Posted by: George at December 19, 2009 4:16 PM

I was Christmas shopping at Borders yesterday and saw a new Star Wars book for sale. It was called "Death Troopers" and the cover was a stormtrooper helmet with blood dripping from the eye and mouth area hanging from a meat hook.

So there you have it, ladies and gentleman. The fucking Star Wars universe is going "torture porn". Not that I have ever read nor ever plan to read a Star Wars book, but that is just so fucking wrong I don't even know where to begin.

Posted by: Irving Washington at December 19, 2009 6:04 PM

Buffy and Angel were never on Fox, but on the WB and then UPN (for BtVS.

I, uh, actually know this. I blame my snot-packed sinus cavities for affecting my brain.

Buffy ran for seven seasons and Angel for five, so they weren't exactly nipped in the bud.

This I am fully aware of, as I have all 12 of these seasons on DVD. I might agree that Buffy had run its course, but I do believe Angel could have had more stories left to tell. Anyhoodles, point was, they were around before any of the newer items mentioned, and their ends, timely or un-, left a void that people sought to fill.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpuppet at December 19, 2009 7:04 PM

Because I'm ignorant - I just looked it up, and yes, Scary Movie the very first was made in 2000, so it counts, and there is therefore no justification for it not being on this list. Otherwise, well done sir.

Posted by: dsbs at December 19, 2009 8:30 PM

I have a feeling that the Movie Movies weren't included because...all they've really spawned is movies that are exactly alike made...by the same people. So it hasn't really 'spread' into Hollywood as much as the others on the list have. There's a lot of them, sure, but they're by the same morons and hardly anyone watches them anymore. So they're not as poisonous as the others, I think.

Posted by: figgy at December 19, 2009 11:15 PM

Twilight begat True Blood? I think not. Twilight was published in 2005; The "Sookie Stackhouse" novels (Dead Until Dark, Dead in Dallas, etc.) began coming out in 2001, thank you very much.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at December 19, 2009 1:05 AM


But would those books have been turned into a TV show if it weren't for the current craze?

Posted by: Daniel Hall at December 20, 2009 6:23 PM

I believe that Charlaine Harris' novels are great ideas wrapped in terrible prose and even worse pacing. I would put the quality of her writing just below Mr Brown and just above Ms Meyers.

I think the TV show does Harris' concept far more justice than the books.

Also, since when did JK Rowling become a terrible author? Her books are well-written, concise and grow in complexity as her audience ages. Tell me another series of children's novels that demonstrate that!

I seem to disagree a lot when posting.

Posted by: Peter G at December 20, 2009 9:15 PM

I swear to you, I will throw myself into a wood chipper if this fucking Clue remake actually happens.

A wood chipper.

Posted by: Smokin at December 21, 2009 3:54 AM

Smokin, don't be ridiculous. That's what you do if they remake a Coen brothers movie.

You must beat yourself to death with a wrench in someone's conservatory.

Posted by: becks at December 21, 2009 9:50 AM

Becks...

nothing but net.

I shall put away my lead pipe and slip back to the library.

Colonel Mustard is fucked.

Posted by: Peter G at December 21, 2009 5:54 PM

Dude, True Blood rocks! It has NOTHING to do with Twilight! It's all sex and violence and killing and gap-toothed Sookie Stackhouse, er, Anna Paquin! I've read all the Twilight books -- regrettably -- and even seen the movies -- blame on the gf -- wait, I don't have a girlfriend -- who can I blame it on?!!!! -- I've just lost all credibility even in my eyes -- damn.

Posted by: Cuatro at December 22, 2009 7:15 AM

I'm sorry but not only was the True Blood TV series out before Twilight, but the books True Blood was based on (Dead Until Dark) was also written before Twilight.

True Blood (TV) = air date Sept 7, 2008
Twilight (movie) = opening day Nov 21, 2008

Dead Until Dark = publication May 1, 2001
Twilight = publication Oct 5, 2005

plus the fact that the two are very different (Twilight sucks and Bella is a HORRIBLE role model for girls).

Posted by: Beth at December 23, 2009 11:53 AM

I'm just here to leave a positive comment on True Blood. This would've been a funny/witty/etc article if you wouldn't have compared the two.

Posted by: Lena at December 24, 2009 6:22 AM

Transformers at #1? You clearly just hate Michael Bay.

Posted by: Josh at December 30, 2009 1:41 PM

It also got a little tedious seeing Vote For Pedro tees on everyone. I agree about Zemeckis, he should quit Mo-cap, or at least do it properly like James Cameron. Avatar was neither creepy nor crappy.

Posted by: Miles at January 5, 2010 8:59 AM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment:



Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.



Related Posts with Thumbnails









twitter_badge-thumb-300x110-5250.jpg facebook-thumb-300x112-5252.jpg




recentreview.jpg