web
counter
 

Rio Review: A Very Colorful Pile of Bird Droppings

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (20)



rio1sm.jpg

Once upon a time, I dated a guy whose cockatiel had a bit of a masturbation problem; even worse, the damn bird made a habit of staring at me while doing it. Needless to say, the relationship soon hit an impasse, but I’ve never forgotten that evil eye of the feathery one. Exactly what does this anecdote have to do with Rio? Both feature birds that, figuratively speaking, made me want to take immediate flight into the nearest plate glass window.

In Rio, our tale begins by introducing a socially awkward macaw named Blu (Jesse Eisenberg, naturally) that lives in Minnesota with his owner, Linda (Leslie Mann), who affectionately calls her pet a “nerd bird” because he can’t fly (even though he’s very studied in matters of “quadrated vector angles”), but he can fetch Linda’s breakfast for her every morning. Sure, it’s unbelievable, but this movie comes from Blue Sky Studios production, and this preposterousness is nothing that you wouldn’t normally expect from the people who brought you the Ice Age franchise, the last installment of which told the tale of dinosaurs and mammoths living together in temporal harmony. On board once again is Carlos Saldanha, who directed all of the Ice Age movies as well, and Rio’s utterly inept screenplay comes courtesy of four writers, including Don Rhymer (Big Mommas’s House; The Santa Clause 2) plus Joshua Sternin and Jeffrey Ventimila (The Tooth Fairy; Yogi Bear). Essentially, this thing was doomed from the very beginning.

Moving on within the scale of extreme unbelievability, Blu and Linda’s domestic harmony eventually gets interrupted when an odd ornithologist, Tulio (Rodrigo Santoro), just shows up one day and informs Linda that Blu is the very last cerulean-shaded male macaw in existence. Tulio implores the pair to come to Rio so that Blu can mate with his cerulean-shaded female macaw, Jewel (Anne Hathaway), and perpetuate the species. The trouble is that Jewel is not impressed by Blu’s very un-birdlike ways, so she runs like hell, which wouldn’t be such a problem if Jewel’s ankle wasn’t chained to that of her non-flying companion. Cue an endless series of footbound chase scenes through the various parades of the Rio Carnival. It’s wacky. It’s madcap. It’s fruitlessly exhausting.

Within the titular destination, the camera often swoops and soars just like a bird would, and the panoramas of Rio de Janeiro and its surrounding areas could accurately be described as “breathtaking” by easily impressed types. The film explores both Rio’s flawlessly white beaches and impressive skyscrapers and also its lowly favela where families struggle on a daily basis. Some small measure of credit is due to this brief acknowledgment of the city’s socioeconomic strata, but it’s quite strange that this Rio is primarily inhabited by, uh, white people. Luckily (or not), the black and Hispanic quotas are filled by members of the animal kingdom, primarily in the form of some streetwise friends — Pedro (will.i.am) the cardinal, Nico (Jamie Foxx) the canary, Rafael (George Lopez) the toucan, and Luiz (Tracy Morgan) the bulldog — that help Blu and Jewel in their attempts to reunite with Linda while simultaneously aiming to avoid some evil bird smugglers, who are receiving aid from a villainous cockatoo named (Jemaine Clement of Flight of the Conchords, as if your kids even care). It’s never a matter of whether this story will have a happy and predictable ending but only a question of whether the audience will first be driven mad by the incessantly thumping samba and assortment of “spirited” musical numbers.

The voice work here, if you can call it that, is highly uneven. The two leads don’t stretch their proverbial wings at all. Eisenberg is doing his classic socially awkward shtick (to be fair, it would have been worse coming from Michael Cera), and Hathaway tries far too hard and exudes a very desperate sort of energy akin to the infamous “brown duck” from Oscar night. Faring slightly better are Morgan and Clement in supporting roles that are just not enough to outweigh the needless mediocrity that persists throughout the picture. With that said, any child under the age of seven should thrill to the sight of all of these pretty anythings echoing within an endless stream of animal slapstick, but older children and adults just won’t see the point. And that’s just it, for Rio is a very pointless movie (other than a vague lesson about courage when Blu learns to get his shit together and make like a real bird) and just another excuse to make parents take their kids to the movies. Especially egregious is the attempt to sell this film in “eye-popping” 3D (with necessarily dimmer colors) when color is such a huge element of the film’s limited appeal. Hell, you’d be far better off skipping this one and watching Rango again.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Scream 4 Review: When There's Nothing Left but the Reborquel | Chicks Don't Dig the Sword and Actors Sh*t On their Own Flicks









Comments

how the fudge-ums does this movie have such a high rating on rotten tomatoes?

Hey critics, it isn't Pixar.

Posted by: maka at April 16, 2011 2:10 PM

Anne Hathaway, Jamie Foxx and the black guy from that group with the ugly girl that pisses on herself.

There's your three strikes.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 16, 2011 2:30 PM

Keep and eye on the foreign box office of this movie. It opened abroad first, is number one in Brazil, opening weekend made 13 million reais, double the current number one for the year (Tangled), and worth something like 8 or 9 million dollars. So if you start to wonder about so many movies being made in Rio, that's basically one of the reasons, they can bring something like 50 million dollars of box office, plus what they save hiring cheap people here, just by filming it in Brazil.

Brazilians have a thing that they HAVE to see it when people are "talking about them", so it will have a long life and take a lot of money here. The thing is part of the press is making a big deal about how Rio is shown as a paradise with stupid people and a lot of colors. And happy birds. Funny thing is there is also a big deal being made about all the crime shown in Fast Five. So maybe they should mash up both movies together, and it would be a more accurate picture of what Rio really is like.

Posted by: zito at April 16, 2011 3:05 PM

I like women in g-strings. Especially if they have nice Brazilian asses.

Can I film a video there?

Posted by: maka at April 16, 2011 3:24 PM

The plot sounds suspiciously familiar to Pixar's (now abandoned) movie "Newt." The last newt on earth is forced to share a cage with the last female newt on earth in hopes of procreation. HMMMMM......

Posted by: Kristin at April 16, 2011 3:47 PM

awesome title.

Posted by: haplo at April 16, 2011 4:25 PM

I fear for parents who must take their kids to movies like this.

Posted by: Fredo at April 16, 2011 5:01 PM

Having recently sat through Hop and Diary of a Wimpy Kid (hey, it's been a long, cold, wet spring here in the Midwest), I have to say that this movie wasn't so bad. I'd say it's on the high mediocre end of the scale. At least it was appropriate for kids and didn't contain any cursing, which is more than I could say for Rango. I'm not opposed to cursing in appropriate places, but if I have to hold my damn tongue in front of my kid, then so should the motherfucking CARTOONS.

Posted by: idgiepug at April 16, 2011 6:01 PM

I too actually enjoyed this movie. As far as saying it's "pointless", at least it is bringing light to the horrible origins of the exotic pet trade. It is a rare movie that shows the beauty of these creatures to children, while also showing why it is not natural for birds to be pets in cages. Hopefully that will dampen any rush that this movie might cause to run out and buy a pet birdie (a REALLY bad idea if you don't know *exactly* what you're getting into).

Posted by: Eva at April 16, 2011 6:38 PM

I wasn't going to see this movie, but then my baby smiled at me.

Posted by: The Mutt at April 16, 2011 8:10 PM

Fredo Free will has a lot to do with it.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at April 16, 2011 10:47 PM

I had no intentions on seeing this one anyways! Thank you, Pajiba! At least I can count on someone to have decent taste!

I totally agree with maka; how the hell is this rating so high on rotten tomatoes? Seriously!

Posted by: Mr X at April 17, 2011 1:21 AM

@Eva ... considering that "Finding Nemo" had the message that clownfish should be left in the while, yet it's release resulted in a massive decline of wild clownfish, I'm not expecting that this movie will discourage anyone from "buying a pet birdie."

Posted by: Betty at April 17, 2011 3:57 AM

"The plot sounds suspiciously familiar to Pixar's (now abandoned) movie "Newt." The last newt on earth is forced to share a cage with the last female newt on earth in hopes of procreation. HMMMMM......"

Posted by: Kristin at April 16, 2011 3:47 PM

-----

I think I saw that earlier this morning. It was an episode of Twilight Zone starring Elizabeth Montgomery and Charles Bronson as the last two people on Earth.

As for this movie, I'd say something appropriately vitriolic, but I can't think of anything offhand.

Posted by: The Wanderer at April 17, 2011 6:27 AM

Oh, yeah, here's something I should probably point out in this movie: why the hell is Rio being portrayed as a happy place here? Isn't it one of the most violent places in the world or something? 'Cos this movie doesn't look like it captures that mood at all. Why the hell would you make a movie about Rio and not make any attempt to show us what a violent place it really is? Why?

Posted by: Mr X at April 17, 2011 8:27 AM

I want to watch this wonderful movie, but have no time! sign~

Posted by: Garyge at April 17, 2011 11:28 AM

Once upon a time, I dated a guy whose cockatiel had a bit of a masturbation problem; even worse, the damn bird made a habit of staring at me while doing it.

AgentBedhead, where I work that's called "gunning." And yes, it's objectionable.

Posted by: The Wanderer at April 17, 2011 2:56 PM

Once again the Republican doesn't like a movie intended for CHILDREN. Once again I disagree with her. And Rio won the weekend box office. Clearly the Republican is not their demographic.

Posted by: lachica at April 17, 2011 9:07 PM

Thank you, lachica..

Just what I was going to say. This movie was intended for KIDS! Those saying it should have shown what a "violent place Rio is", really???? Kind of a stupid comment.
I watched this with my 2 1/2 year old (his first trip to the movies) and we enjoyed it. I wasn't analyzing it like some people, because its a damn kids' movie!!
Different opinions and that's fine, as long as we remember that this isn't a film produced for adults.
I agree with the reviews Rotten Tomatoes. All the positive reviewers can't be wrong, can they?? If you want to watch it, watch it. Yes its not a Pixar film, but it was still good entertainment for a CHILDREN'S film.

Posted by: Susan at April 18, 2011 1:42 AM

Agreed with Susan, positive reviews are honest opinions unless they are being paid

Posted by: luxury shop online at June 8, 2011 2:38 AM