web
counter
 

Rango Review: Children Strictly Optional

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (41)



rango5sm.jpg

Scrub away all of your doubts about the ability of the omnipresent Johnny Depp (whose cinematic output has been — let’s face it — less than impressive lately) to carry a leading voice role without overpowering an entire film. Dismiss all preconceived notions about director Gore Verbinski’s first stab at an animated picture, for this final product is much smarter than any of that Pirates of the Caribbean garbage. Yet, at the same time, Rango is still as much of a rip-roaring ride as it effortlessly blends genres and their archetypes into an Old West setting. The story by Verbinski and his screenwriter, John Logan (The Aviator), initially covers some familiar ground by exploring the well-treaded “fish out of water” motif, but that’s the limit of any genericism. Here, Depp plays a lizard who dreams big and generally amuses himself by acting within his own plays and pauses only to reflect, “Our story needs an ironic, unexpected event that will propel our hero into conflict.” Well, that unexpected event quickly takes place, but the true irony here is that there’s precious little irony to be found within Rango.

Instead, this is both a character and plot-driven film that contains plenty of subtext yet still manages to avoid a heavy-handed approach. Even better, it’s quirky without being obnoxious. The story takes place in a West where there is no room for gunslingers or legends, only businessmen. Rango is like Chinatown with unmistakeable touches from Raising Arizona and Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, drenched in surrealism and entrenched within a gritty, harsh desert setting. Fittingly, the movie is also a throwback to the glorious spaghetti Westerns of Sergio Leone and Ennio Morricone, and Rango contains a blissful absence of pop culture allusions other than what’s necessary for the story. It indulges in the rampant destruction of life and limb, throws in a few quick-flying sexual jokes, and features more than one character shouting “Go to hell!”

With that said, Rango is (barely) innocuous enough for families but probably most enjoyable for adult audiences.

Meanwhile, the substance of Rango is steadfastly matched by its wit and style. One of the more memorable characters unfurls himself as villainous Rattlesnake Jake (Bill Nighy), whose tail houses a rapid-fire gun instead of a rattle. Jake coils so effortlessly throughout the frame that he oozes into the audience. This attention to detail goes for the rest of the visuals, which are so stunning and and lifelike that they don’t need no stinkin’ 3D. The look of the entire film is majestic — from the soaring sunsets with light streaming through striated clouds to starry vistas and sand dunes under the full moon to a smoky, dusty saloon with creaky ceiling fans — and echoed through a painstakingly effective framing of shots. Consideration is also given to costuming detail and a Hans Zimmer score that is very deliberately infused with the sounds of Morricone but somehow seems fresh as it accompanies the wonderful lead character throughout his journey.

Let’s go back to that unexpected event. While on a road trip with his human owners, Depp’s nameless chameleon feels a few bumps in the road and soon lands on the side of the highway amongst the scattered remains of his terrarium. As a domesticated animal, he is unaccustomed to the unfriendly climate in which he finds himself, but he immediately meets a half-crushed armadillo (aptly named Roadkill and voiced by Alfred Molina), who points him in the direction of the nearest civilization. On the way, he meets a girl lizard named Beans (Isla Fisher), who takes him to a town called Dirt, where special events occur at high noon and which is populated by lizards, possums, rats, and birds — all of which are dressed in standard Old West regalia such as Sunday suits and sombreros — and where all of the towns citizens are suffering from one major predicament: a lack of water. Our chameleon immediately stumbles into the nearest saloon and conjures up a new Far West persona (borrowing his new name, Rango, from a bottle of cactus juice) as a killer who once took out seven men with just one bullet. Fortunately, Rango is an extremely resourceful lizard who manages to fake out the skeptics and is crowned Sheriff by the Mayor (Ned Beatty). At first, the new lawman is all duds and swagger, but the water issue cannot be ignored for long. All the while, Rango’s adventure is steadfastly narrated by four cute little mariachi owls, who impart such gems as “sinking into the guacamole of his own deception” and keep the story moving swiftly despite a 107 minute runtime.

As if the movie weren’t scoring enough points already, the voice work works far beyond the scope of most celebrity efforts. Fisher and Nighy are both excellent, and Depp proves himself to be a true chameleon, virtually unrecognizable as himself. A little bonus comes in the form of Timothy Olyphant, who voices the Spirit of the West character that seems a perfect parody of Clint Eastwood’s “Man with No Name.” I must admit that Olyphant does no heavy straining here and sounds, well, exactly like Olyphant, but it’s difficult to complain about such a trifle, particularly when his presence and voice easily conjures up images of Old West justice. Word on the street is that Verbinski took a rather unorthodox approach with his actors, going so far as to require them to perform their dialogue together in the same room (gasp!). As such, the cast truly works together in ensemble form and bounces off each other quite nicely. As for Rango himself, he eventually learns that “No man can walk out on his own story,” and he must live up to his adopted identity and carry though for the town of Dirt and his story’s audience. And he does just that. As such, Rango is more than worth your time and the most enjoyable animated pic to duel within multiplexes in quite some time.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



"Worst in Show" Review: Documenting the World's Ugliest Dog Contest | Player One: What Is to Become of Us by Douglas Coupland









Comments

Who the hell are the adults who go see this kind of shit without any kids with them? Who are these losers? Don't they have anything better to do with their time except watch a fucking cartoon?

Christ, get a life, Dickhead.

Posted by: Case at March 5, 2011 3:45 PM

AB, you have made my day. I will now see this film based on your review. Thanks!
(And I'm glad that you finally got to watch a good one.)

Posted by: Spender at March 5, 2011 3:49 PM

Just came back form the film. It was damn good. Most the trailers before hand for films like Rio and Hoodwinked 2 make it obvious Rango is gonna be one of the best this year, easy Oscar nomination.

Posted by: C. Towns at March 5, 2011 3:59 PM

How's that blood pressure, Case?

Posted by: Matty at March 5, 2011 4:02 PM

Christ, get a life, Dickhead.
Posted by: Case at March 5, 2011 3:45 PM

Lighten up, Francis.

Anyway this was strictly a rental until you mentioned Olyphant. Sold
You know, I always find it bizarre that animated films are voiced with the actors isolated from one another while supposedly being in the same scene. One would think it makes for a more complicated experience no to mention time consuming. No wonder animation is such a lengthy and costly thing.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at March 5, 2011 4:06 PM

Christ, get a life, Dickhead.
Posted by: Case

Like a life spent trolling nerds?

I freely admit it's my own grumpiness and totally not a real issue, but...it drives me crazy when no one refers to a chameleon as a chameleon. He's just "a lizard". Like calling Rafiki a baboon the whole damn movie when he's clearly a mandrill.

Posted by: Protoguy at March 5, 2011 5:09 PM

So, following troll's logic, only romantic couples can see rom-coms and only urban audiences can see Tyler Perry movies?

Posted by: Fredo at March 5, 2011 5:44 PM

Only urban audiences can see Tyler Perry movies? Christ, I wouldn't even wish it on them.

Posted by: Jason at March 5, 2011 5:56 PM

Slim has a good point about the voice-overs being done together at once, but show a little respect for these hardworking movie stars: we obviously know it makes too much fiscal sense and requires genuine effort for an actor to tolerate the presence of actually performing with another actor, which is why guys like Brad Pitt, Leo DiCaprio and other big names lend their voices to shitty animated movies- they take the jobs for the easy money and to get the fuck out of there without undue inconvenience and a fraction of the blame when a film tanks.

Good work if you can get it.

Posted by: JimBoi at March 5, 2011 6:02 PM

No, not only black people(just say black, not urban)see Tyler Perry movies. Stupid, lazy people of all races see them.

As for Rango, I want to see it, but have kids handy to borrow to take. I guess I will just have to wait to download it in a few weeks.

AS for the cast. I have a question...if this was a live action movie with that cast, wouldn't you run to see it? I would

Posted by: Sean at March 5, 2011 6:23 PM

First, I just got back from seeing this. It's the best movie I've seen in months and months, hands down. It's the best western I've seen in I don't know how long.

Sure, you can take kids to see it, and the little munchkins will have their cinematic bloodlust well sated.

But you can just go with friends. Take a girl. In fact, drag total strangers to the theater and see it with them. You will part friends.

The cast was superb, the visuals were stunning, the story was mythic and the music was wonderfully apt. I loved every minute, and it seemed so short once it was over.

I would see this again in a minute. I may go see it again tomorrow, if I can drag some friends (or strangers) along.

This was a fine film, Case. And I'm sorry that your life has left you so ground down and small. Is there no magnificence in you? Is there no urge to throw back your shoulders and laugh?

I think you need a hug, my friend.

Posted by: Wintermute at March 5, 2011 6:58 PM

I'm so glad this is good. I'll probably see it late matinee tomorrow, thanks Bedhead. I am most definitely an unrepentant dickhead loser who is very much looking forward to this film!

Posted by: becks at March 5, 2011 8:13 PM

I'm such a big loser, I'll probably buy the DVD just for little old me.

Posted by: snapnhiss at March 5, 2011 8:42 PM

from looking at stills, the artwork looks incredible, and i love a good spaghetti western.

this whole kid/adult thing about animation gets so confused.

animation is a medium, not a genre or audience age bracket. north american animation is almost universally marketed as kid or family films, even when they aren't. what you get are neat films that adults enjoy, but would not offend a parent if their kid saw it. instead of simply saying, this animated film is a kids film, while this other one is a film for adults, they try and blend them--which I suppose, when it works, gains the most audience, from a business perspective.

i do get annoyed at supposed kids films, hijacked by themes, ideas and humour for adults and get just as annoyed that we rarely get an adult animated film that isn't watered down for the child audience. european animation and asian animation is different in this regard. they use animation as a pure medium and some stories are for one audience and some for another. mostly i dislike how squeamish north america is about the idea of animation as an adult media.

Random list of adult animation:

Metropia, The plague Dogs, $9.99, Ghandahar, Fire and Ice(the Bhakti one--anything by bhakti), Fantastic Planet, A Scanner Darkly, The Illusionist, plymptoons, Heavy Metal, When The Wind Blows, Waltz With bashir, Persepolis,Titan A.E., Paprika, tekkonkinkreet, Marry and Max, Renaissance.

just a brief random list. animation is growing at an exponential rate ( see this chronological list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animated_feature_films#2010s )

yet north america is often enough slow on the uptake. animation is such a deep well to be mined. rango looks like it will be pretty damn fine.

Posted by: idleprimate at March 5, 2011 9:05 PM

Posted by: idleprimate at March 5, 2011 9:14 PM

@idleprimate

The stills don't do it justice. Rango was fantastic on so many levels.

And you are painfully correct in your critique of North American... well, it's not audiences, because animated films do well here. Conventional Wisdom?

But while you have a point about the watering down of themes and the blurring of the lines. In fact, as we were leaving the theatre I got into an argument over whether the film was perhaps a little too dark for the four and six year-olds in the audience. Personally, I don't think it was, but that's for every parent to decide for themselves.

Don't worry though, change is coming. It is going to take a while, because the only certain way to change peoples' minds about something is to wait for them to get old and die off, but animated films have been getting more complex and mature for a long time.

Add in the way media travels these days, and animated features or short films from all over the world entering the North American market (Studio Ghibli has been huge that way, and I wouldn't call their features 'watered down') and the momentum just keeps on building.

What impressed me most about Rango, I think, was that if you swapped out the possums and horned toads and gila monsters (Ray Winstone, stroke of genius casting him) for people you'd have a movie that would hold up well against any western done in the last twenty, thirty years.

Not that there have been a lot of them, but there have been a few pretty good ones here and there.

Rango definitely fits. I just finished watching The Magnificent Seven (tomorrow night I guess I'll have to watch Kurosawa's original to preserve the ritual) and the vibe from both films was very similar.

I think I'm going to crack open my emergency tequila. Anyone else fancy a drink?

Posted by: Wintermute at March 5, 2011 9:24 PM

I would never accuse ghibli of anything other than pure genius absolute magick for all ages.

i only meant that there is a difference between 3 kinds of stories.

1) for kids: kids are delighted, they want to watch it over and over and the adult is mortified. this is valid viewing for kids, they aren't stupid, if they like it, it is good kids fare even if we loathe it. think anything like chipmunks or yogi bear live/animation mix ups. the measuring stick is the kids, not us. our thoughts do not count. if the kids don't buy it, well, then it is open season.

2) timeless cinema: this is a vague area of movies that really move people, enchant them, ignite their pathos, and stay with them. its magic for kids and magic for adults. think Iron Giant, or Snow White. think Mary Poppins(which has animation).

3) for adults: stories and characters designed to have either, complex stories that require reflection, or else, intense sensibilities of passion, violence or mature sentiment. This ranges from Akira to Where the Wind Blows to Waltz With Bashir, to American Pop. and maybe kids need the trauma of WTWB, like we dose them with Watership Down.

yes, i am passionately obsessive about animation.

Posted by: idleprimate at March 5, 2011 10:22 PM

Quite possibly I'll pay this fee. When's it playing a Southbank IMAX?

Posted by: Pork Bowl at March 5, 2011 10:57 PM

Just got back from seeing Rango and the movie was fine but I will be damned if the little ankle biter behind me didn't kick my seat the whole time.

Posted by: Cookie at March 5, 2011 11:56 PM

Idleprimate,

Sorry, guess I phrased myself badly. Never meant to intimate that you'd think less of Studio Ghibli. Just that *I* couldn't.

I really respect anyone who is so passionate about anything, and I feel much the same way about cartoons. But while the walls are blurring a little more than they used to, I don't have a problem with that.

Provided that it's done in a GOOD film.

Before Christmas, I went and saw Tangled with a relative. Honestly, all I remember about it was a lot of generic humour-ness and a handful of clever or beautiful moments (usually backgrounds and scenery). Largely forgettable.

The previews for Rango were for a bunch of other animated films coming out this year or later... HOP, Rio (I think, but I wouldn't swear to it), Hoodwinked 2 (kill me now, that looks frelling terrible) and a Shrek Spin-off: Puss In Boots.

Blurring the lines between kids movie and adults movie for those only bugs me because they look to be terrible, execrable films. I feel that if parents are going to take their kids to see Hoodwinked 2, they should have to sit through all the bathroom humour and fifth rate slapstick without having a few subtle, older jokes tossed their way to relieve the mind-numbing experience.

Let them suffer. If their kids have to, so should they.

But in Rango, honestly, I see it as a movie that anyone can enjoy. Unless, as Arthur Ransome put it, they have been thoroughly disheartened by life. There is something for everyone, and while there were a few little bits that may not stand the test of time (though I'm dubious of that), the plot and the characters seem to me to be timeless.

Posted by: Wintermute at March 6, 2011 12:12 AM

Really well written, AB. I had high hopes for this, and you've put my ass in a seat next weekend.

Posted by: Lauren at March 6, 2011 12:43 AM

"it drives me crazy when no one refers to a chameleon as a chameleon."

Especially since in this case, the fact that he's a chameleon is essential to the plot. The whole story is about him trying to blend in, becoming a different person. I was a little disappointed they didn't do more with his literal ability to change color, but they did do great expressive things with his bug eyes.

Posted by: Robin at March 6, 2011 1:12 AM

You know what's really good about living in a country 95% populated by five-year-old mentally incapacitated lemmings?

This really great movie will open in my city's rooms only in dubbed copies. Because "animation is for kids". Just like "voice acting is not acting".

Sigh... Not a chance to see it in the big screen. I'll be sure to download the original work. Fuck you, suits.

Posted by: godzilla_foil at March 6, 2011 1:40 AM

och, i want no blurring between the lines. that was my complaint. i want surreal and silly kids movies, and i want kids movies that are junk by our standards because we don't know what will enamour them. i just want adult pictures separate and not needing kid hooks.

Posted by: idleprimate at March 6, 2011 1:56 AM

idleprimate,

Then go see Rango. They may market it as a kids movie, but it's not. It's just fun from start to finish. With explosions, chases, gunfights, showdowns, heroes, villains and a Chameleon chewing the scenery all the way to the bitter end.

Posted by: Wintermute at March 6, 2011 2:57 AM

You stir that pot Case...stir it good.

Posted by: Illuminatus at March 6, 2011 6:09 AM

@Case-
Silly troll, your tricks won't work here. Go back to youtube.

Posted by: Slizbomb at March 6, 2011 8:56 AM

Christ, get a life, Dickhead.

You high fived yourself after that brilliant bon mot, didn't you? It's ok, middle school doesn't last forever.

Posted by: TylerDFC at March 6, 2011 12:57 PM

Barbadoslim FTW with the "Stripes" quote

Posted by: JackRankom at March 6, 2011 6:54 PM

We saw it this afternoon. It's the best Depp movie in a while.

It's definitely a nice mix of Chinatown, the spaghetti westerns, with a dash of Blazzing Saddles. It's also kinda meta but in a sneaky way. I swear I even heard a Fear of a Black Hat joke in there, that never happens.


Posted by: Mebe at March 6, 2011 10:53 PM

Well-trod, I should think.

Posted by: AM at March 7, 2011 12:02 AM

I will see this - with one caveat: Please tell me there's no refeence to or playing of that abysmal 80s earworm "Karma Chameleon"?
Cause I've been to the 80s and I'm never going back.

Posted by: cinekat at March 7, 2011 7:46 AM

Glad to hear kids are optional. The neighbors raised the rent on theirs.

Posted by: logan at March 7, 2011 9:31 AM

"Depp proves himself to be a true chameleon, virtually unrecognizable as himself."
---
"Wow, Johnny Depp was GREAT at not sounding like Johnny Depp!"

WTF?

Truly we live in a marketing-driven universe, where name actors do voice work that doesn't sound like them at all -- that any starving actor who needs a paycheck to make the rent could have done -- merely so the marketing types can put "Starring Johnny Depp" in all the ads.

Posted by: , at March 7, 2011 11:09 AM

I'm so glad this turned out to be good. I was going to take the kids this week anyway just because it looked hopeful but I'm relieved to know that it's genuinely enjoyable.

Posted by: Paultera at March 7, 2011 11:46 AM

SO GLAD that this is good. I've been wanting to see it ever since I saw a little piece on how it was made: apparently, Verbinski not only had all the actors acting in the same room, but they used their movements and mannerisms as the foundation for the way that they animated the characters. They even did stunts.

So much more than just talking into a microphone. Bravo, Verbinski & Co.

Posted by: Livience at March 8, 2011 2:58 AM

The more ads I see of this, the more I think this could actually turn out to be a pretty decent flick.
Good to see this is good, which is probably more than what will be said about Rio; a film that looks like it will FAIL EPICALLY!!!

Posted by: Anonymous at March 8, 2011 7:19 AM

cinekat, you're safe. Not only was there no Karma Chameleon whatsoever, the music was FANTASTIC. I just got back from this and had to come here to rave. This could easily stand alone as a mildly slapstick but well-plotted live-action film. The art is amazing, the scenery is spectacular, and they clearly spent a lot of time on the characterization. This is a well-populated crew of memorably weird little creatures.

And I am seriously considering the purchase of that soundtrack. When the momentary end-credit electric guitar solo is animated to be the correct guitar that would have been used by The Ventures for that style of surf guitar music, you know somebody really cares (yes I live with a guitarist). And the end credits are awesome, too.

Posted by: Anne (no longer in Reno) at March 19, 2011 1:11 AM

Case, just for you I will relate a story that happened to me once. I like comic books. I don't really bother buying individual comics anymore, and tend to wait for the graphic novels to come out, and tend to focus on "mature audience" titles anyway, but when this happened back in the 90s I was perusing a comic book rack, and a kid who appeared about 10 or so said to me, "What are you doing looking at the comic books? Comics are for KIDS."

I rarely think of what I should say when I should say it and rather suffer from l'esprit de escalier, but I said to him, "Really? Do you think kids wrote these, or drew them? Inked, colored, edited or published them?"

If you are of the mindset that anything animated is just for kids, then I truly feel pity for you.

Posted by: Noelegy at April 13, 2011 12:21 PM

P.S. I cannot wait to see this.

Posted by: Noelegy at April 13, 2011 12:22 PM

I don't know, this review was pretty far up its own asshole. I know you all fucking lurve Depp and Olyphant, but I think you're giving the movie a lot more credit than it deserved.

It's not like it was Tombstone or something.

Posted by: Salad Is Murder at April 16, 2011 6:30 PM