web
counter
 

It's Judgment That Defeats Us

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (53)



Apocalypse_Now-02.gif

“We train young men to drop fire on people. But their commanders won’t allow them to write “fuck” on their airplanes because it’s obscene!” - Colonel Kurtz

Apocalypse Now is three hours of surreal spectacle wrapped up in the haunting question of how war can be reconciled with morality. Released in 1979, the first stirrings of the film’s script were written in 1967 before the Vietnam War even peaked, and filming began in the Philippines less than a year after the final American pull out from South Vietnam. Other films trickled out during the seventies and eighties, exploring the effect of war on men, on the disintegration of psyche under unimaginable tension and violence, but Apocalypse Now aimed at a different and more significant target. Those other meditations on hell sidestepped the issue of war in order to condemn it. Such films get the brutality, but miss the complexity. They condemn war without confronting the issue of what the hell to do if we end up in one anyway.

Coppola takes that extra step in Apocalypse Now, going beyond either glorifying heroes or mourning the horror to ask: given the horror, what do we do? That’s a question that leaves the film still resonating thirty years later, even to those for whom Vietnam was just the last chapter of their high school history text book.

The films takes its form from Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, not in a direct adaptation but in the framing. A little boat, winding its way up a river, farther and farther from civilization, deeper and deeper into the jungle. Violence occurs at every step, in diminishing elaboration. First there are helicopters, airstrikes then mere guns suffice, then arrows and spears, and finally nothing but a machete in a broken old temple. But the impulse is the same once the veneer is gradually stripped off, the same heart beating at the center of the malignancy.

There’s a sense of imbalance throughout the progression. A Western Culture of hotel rooms, porn, and surfing grafted onto the ancient draining of blood. Desk job white collar CIA suits give Willard his assignment, go kill Kurtz. And for what? Killing. Go kill someone for killing in the middle of a war. He broke the rules, which is the sort of statement that makes sense in peace and none in war. What is war but the ultimate breaking of all rules?

Kurtz gets it, up in his ancient temple, surrounded by hundreds of bodies, waging a war so unrelenting that even the enemies of his enemies are terrified of him. But he’s not a barbarian, not some bloodthirsty demagogue with a pyramid of skulls. That wouldn’t be a danger in need of an assassin. That would be a good general with a pile of medals so long as he didn’t make the six o’clock news. The problem with Kurtz is that he sees past the simple brutality into the existential problem. If civilization is order and rules while war is the contrary, how can civilized man fight war? The easy answer is that he can’t, that to descend into barbarity is to lose civilization but to cling to civilization is to lose to the barbarians at the gates.

But this terrible dichotomy is not so new. Coppola doesn’t commit the vanity of assuming that the psychotic break between civilization and war is some new thing stumbled upon by middle class Americans. It’s not Americans who betray Kurtz in the end, but his own native followers, freeing Willard to do the deed. They’re just as terrified of his revelation as the Americans.

What Kurtz has seen though is a way out, the unthinkable solution to the quandary. It’s the same one that the fascists and communists found in their own times before, and hundreds of others before them. If survival requires barbarity but being worth surviving requires civilization, then the answer is in an ideology that allows men to butcher other men and return home to their children with a clean conscience. “The will to do that,” Kurtz observes of an atrocity. Kurtz sees that it is not ethical for men to descend to barbarity, but not sustainable for them to retain their civilization. They must do both at the same time, they must have the will to maintain one’s mind in perfect dichotomy.

When Willard comes to Kurtz, the one thing that they speak of other than the war is Kurtz’s son. As it becomes clear that Kurtz wants to die at Willard’s hands, the real tragedy becomes exposed. Even though he can see what is necessary, he cannot manage the will himself. He cannot go home to his wife and child with the barbarity of the jungle compartmentalized away. It’s significant that the man they choose to send after Kurtz is one who has tried to go home and can’t, who has to return to the jungle because civilization is lost to him. He’s accompanied by kids who are defined by what their lives are back in civilization, banal and normal.

The film essentially leaves us hanging with a sense of unease. There are no right answers, not even any comfortable answers. Just the feeling that it’s all a house of cards.


“We went into a camp to inoculate the children. We left the camp after we had inoculated the children for Polio, and this old man came running after us, and he was crying. He couldn’t see. We went back there, and they had come and hacked off every inoculated arm. There they were in a pile. A pile of little arms. And I thought: My God … the genius of that. The genius. The will to do that. Perfect, genuine, complete, crystalline, pure. And then I realized they were stronger than we. Because they could stand that these were not monsters. These were men.” - Colonel Kurtz


Steven Lloyd Wilson is a hopeless romantic and the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. His novel, ramblings, and assorted fictions coalesce at www.burningviolin.com. You can email him here.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba Love 05/06/10 | The Ten Most Anticipated Summer Blockbusters as Represented by the Leading Actors in Various Stages of Undress









Comments

*wipes bald head with wet towel*

Are you an Assassin?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 6, 2010 2:12 PM

wow, for a second I thought the header pic was of a guy holding an enormous lemon. Does Marlon Brando have a weird-shaped head?

Posted by: Iris at May 6, 2010 2:17 PM

I fucking hate Apocalypse Now. Can't stand it.

Every time I try to watch the film I either get bored to death or shake my head at the stupidity of it. Nothing in that entire film makes sense. The pacing is what really kills me, it is atrocious.

I suppose, maybe, if I want to watch some moral compass movie, a film that is supposed to enlighten me in some way...sure. However, there are plenty of films that execute it better than this one. If this is supposed to be a Vietnam film (which, it is not) there are others that tell a story far better: Hamburger Hill & Platoon.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at May 6, 2010 2:22 PM

Does Full Metal Jacket count as a Vietnam film?

Excellent review, btw.

Posted by: Iris at May 6, 2010 2:25 PM

My favourite war movie ever and I think you captured the essence of the film beautifully, SLW.

I don't disagree with you, Deist. There are films that tell A story better, I don't believe that there are any that tell THE story better.

Posted by: admin at May 6, 2010 2:26 PM

I can see how "Apocalypse Now" would be an acquired taste. And it is kinda slow in parts. But I like the slow parts, too. It builds tension. You know they're going up into enemy territory, so eventually they'll run into people who want to kill them, you just don't know when.

It's greatness.


Posted by: Slash at May 6, 2010 2:41 PM

Does Full Metal Jacket count as a Vietnam film?

Excellent review, btw.

Posted by: Iris at May 6, 2010 2:25 PM
------------------------------------------------

It's really two films, one is well crafted and about the effects of Marine basic training on men.

The other is about Matthew Modine taking pictures or something.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 6, 2010 2:46 PM

Beautiful review SLW but this movie is tainted by my absolute LOATHING of Heart of Darkness. If I want a slow, artistic war movie I prefer the long mind-fuck that is The Thin Red Line.

Posted by: coveredinbees at May 6, 2010 2:50 PM

A series of awesome, memorable scenes. Not sure it adds up to being a great movie though. I thought it fell apart at the end. But I'm willing to give it another fresh look.

Posted by: James S at May 6, 2010 2:51 PM

coveredinbees...The Thin Red Line?

BLARFFFFFFF!!! Oh man...BLARFFFFFF!!!! Make it stop...BLARFFFF!!!!

The best part of that movie was when Woody Harrelson blows his ass off.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at May 6, 2010 3:04 PM

Robert Duvall standing on a beach screaming 'I love the smell of napalm in the morning' is one of the most memorable moments in a movie for me. Just great.

Posted by: Jeni at May 6, 2010 3:05 PM

Nonono the best part is that this was BEFORE Caviezel let himself be ruined by the Gibson machine. Also, Elias Koteas makes awesome out of everything.

Posted by: coveredinbees at May 6, 2010 3:16 PM

Robert Duvall standing on a beach screaming 'I love the smell of napalm in the morning' is one of the most memorable moments in a movie for me. Just great.

Posted by: Jeni at May 6, 2010 3:05 PM
-----------------------------------------------

It's not only when he says it, it's the whole scene. I don't know if it was done that way but it just looks like one continuous shot with all the explosions going on in the background. Duvall was so "on" in that scene that he isn't even blinking or flinching and when he finally says "smells like...victory" you can tell HE (the character) believes it.

THAT is the best scene in the movie by far.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 6, 2010 3:23 PM

But does it come in 3-D?

Coz if it doesn't, how good could it possibly be?

Posted by: bleujayone at May 6, 2010 3:34 PM

It's a joke but it still makes me want to stab something.

Posted by: coveredinbees at May 6, 2010 3:44 PM

The best part of that movie was when Woody Harrelson blows his ass off.

I have to agree. I had to think about it for a little while after I left the theater. Eventually I thought "no...I didn't like that...that was boring self-conscious 'art'". Didn't even have The Doors in it either. I decided Terence Malick believes his press.

Posted by: Jay at May 6, 2010 3:49 PM

I'm much rather be watching the movie right now than be reading this 600 pg analysis of the war. Does this say something about the short attention spans of my generation? Probably. But, god, I love that opening shot with the Doors playing.

Posted by: cleverpeach at May 6, 2010 3:55 PM

Yeah, now I'm torn. I was gonna put on that Blu-ray "Clash Of The Titans" that should be in my mailbox from Netflix when I get home...but which movie would go better with cleaning my kitchen?

Posted by: Jay at May 6, 2010 3:58 PM

I loved the scene where Willard meets Kurtz (the one in the header picture). The bright yellow light and the very dark shadows, and the head of Brando looking like a moon, a horror and a human face all in turns. I know Brando was hidden in the shadows because he'd gotten too fat, but damn, it just works.

Posted by: Annabanana at May 6, 2010 4:24 PM

So some of you didn't think this was a great film?

Humanity never fails to disappoint me. *Shakes head and walks away*

Posted by: PaddyDog at May 6, 2010 4:42 PM

Charlie don't surf!

Posted by: teammlr1 at May 6, 2010 5:33 PM

Watched the "Redux" Extended version in theatres.
I always kind of thought the movie imperfect before. A bit pretentious.
But I quite liked the Redux and the added scenes.
It all just added to the surreality of it.
And it was the final image of the Buddha (?) head in the rain that actually got me.
Like it had been raining for 10,000 years and would for 10,000 more.
It's not the violence, it's the Horror.
Good review.

Posted by: Odnon at May 6, 2010 6:50 PM

There was so much about that movie that struck me about the dichotomy between civilized behavior and war. The French emigres staying in their decaying villa, the riot when the Playboy Bunnies show up at the forward base.

"War is all Hell," it was famously said, and there is no reforming it. It's surreal and chaotic, and the movie caught it well.

Posted by: The Wanderer at May 6, 2010 6:59 PM

It's SUCH a beautifully filmed movie, I mean on just that level alone it's a masterpiece. Everyone's entitled to an opinion, but in mine this was the finest war film ever made.

Posted by: Billy Baloney at May 6, 2010 7:02 PM

All I know about Apocalypse Now is from that Buffy dream episode.

Posted by: ERM at May 6, 2010 7:17 PM

My favorite movie, hands down. "Smells like...victory".

Posted by: K8WMA at May 6, 2010 7:57 PM

Favourite film for about five years

Posted by: actwithoutdoing at May 6, 2010 8:03 PM

And it was the final image of the Buddha (?) head in the rain that actually got me.
Like it had been raining for 10,000 years and would for 10,000 more.
It's not the violence, it's the Horror.

As Sam Kinison told Rodney Dangerfield, I like the way you think.

Sure, it reminds me of the Olmec head in El Rio de Tiempo at Epcot as well as the Southeast Asia part of the Jungle Cruise...but that just makes them both better!

Posted by: Jay at May 6, 2010 8:04 PM

I always assumed that Kurtz sent the natives to free Willard. He sure didn't seem surprised or resist when the time came.

Posted by: Gavin S. at May 6, 2010 9:05 PM

Wilson, your review of “Apocalypse Now” is perhaps the best review I’ve read since I’ve been coming here. Your writing has captured the essence of the complexity of this movie. Apoc-Now is my favorite movie of all time. It is sad that headquarters does not recognize your skill as a reviewer.

Posted by: Pookie at May 6, 2010 9:06 PM

Absolutely fantastic review.

I think a lot of people think that this is a "Vietnam movie". It's not--as your review illustrates, it's something much more. Of course the backdrop of war certainly plays a role in the themes of the film, but I for one have never thought of it as a "war movie".

Posted by: idiot dentist at May 6, 2010 9:55 PM

Kudos, Mr. Wilson.

AN requires, nay demands, multiple viewings. The more you see it, the more it infects you.

Posted by: icecreammang at May 6, 2010 10:43 PM

A film that I know I have to see again in order to fully grasp it's intricacies, but one I never seem to have 3 hours and the right frame of mind to rewatch. I'll do it though.

Fine review SLW.

Posted by: Squirrelgripper at May 6, 2010 11:03 PM

God, that is a brilliant review. Well done. Makes me want to revisit the film...must find the time...

Posted by: d at May 6, 2010 11:20 PM

Mr. Wilson, I'm your fangirl. *blush*
It's a great article - articulate, succinct and intelligent. Bravo!

Posted by: talluhac at May 6, 2010 11:28 PM

One of the best films ever! I personally like the Redux version more. The extra scenes at the plantation especially.

Excellent review too.

Posted by: oskar at May 6, 2010 11:57 PM

Tried. Couldn't stay awake.

Posted by: , at May 7, 2010 1:04 AM

You Mr. Wilson, are the only redeeming feature left on this site, a site that used to offer good reviews of movies (new and old) and is now obsessed with human centipedes and zombies.
Apocalypse Now is, and will remain, one of the best movies made in the the history of film and your review is concise and brilliant. Thank you.

Posted by: brite at May 7, 2010 1:47 AM

Great review of perhaps my favorite movie.

Something else that makes the movie so good, in addition to all the things already mentioned, is how it's flush with literary references.

They connect what's essentially a 20th century art form with a much older one, and it defintely serves the character of the film.

My favorite is when Col. Kurtz reads TS Eliot to Willard...he's reading "the Hollow Men", which contains a reference to Conrad's Heart of Darkness and (Mr.) Kurtz's psychological state.

Also, if you like the movie, check out "Hearts of Darkness", the documentary about the making of the movie...which was nearly as fascinating as the movie itself: epic drug use by many of the actors, Sheen nearly dies of a heart attack during the filming, Coppola almost kills himself, Brando shows up late and ab-libs most of his lines, etc.

Posted by: Jacktrade at May 7, 2010 10:23 AM

I love how long movies bring out the ADD kids. People out there still expect intelligent movies to bring it all to them, without them bringing something to the movie.

Or should Coppola just have front-loaded all of the relevant material in the first 15 minutes to satisfy those of you not willing to earn a realization or several hundred?

How about 180 jump-cuts before the first 5 minutes has elapsed?

Some of you deride Bourne-cam films, but it seems that anything that goes in the other direction is "long and boring".

Or are most of you just frustrated film directors with severe envy for someone who literally takes time to give diligent thought to one of the most pressing issues of our existence (war/brutality/illusion of progress), who doesn't go the easy answer route and makes YOU figure out what the fuck is going on instead of being spoon-fed.

Because, you know, arcana is put up front on billboards for easy access...

Posted by: Recondite at May 7, 2010 10:25 AM

Half-assed dismissals miss the crux of the film: rushing to judgment only forces you to shoehorn an answer into the frame, without actually figuring out what the answer is. Transcend your biases and see it for what it is, not how you judge it to be.

The "long and boring" dismissal says more about you than the film. Coppola got it right, while you are still getting it wrong.

"Wash out your headgear, new guy."

Different war film, but the sentiment applies.

In other words, you have to think in order to understand this film.

Posted by: Recondite at May 7, 2010 10:32 AM

@billy baloney

'coming home in a bodybag' was better

Posted by: jim at May 7, 2010 7:49 PM

Recondite,

Didn't say it was boring. Said I couldn't stay awake. Might have been the beers. I'll have to try again.

It IS looooooong though ...

Posted by: , at May 7, 2010 9:22 PM

I had a lengthy, if somewhat circuitous discussion-type response written out at about 3 a.m., but decided against hitting the post button.

Long and short: Willard is the villain; Kurtz is the hero who knows how to win the war. Willard is the company man; Kurtz has transcended their lying morality. You figure out the rest.

To restate: Willard is the villain.

Posted by: Recondite at May 8, 2010 1:23 PM

"What is war but the ultimate breaking of all rules?"

You are a fucking poet, sir. The good kind.

Posted by: Johnny C. Georgie at May 8, 2010 3:26 PM

Great review, as usual. Thanks!

Posted by: "luker" the barbarian at May 8, 2010 4:13 PM

This may be the very best movie review I have ever read. You make me want to run to my living room and watch that entire movie again right this second. It is greatness.

At the time this film came out, there had been months of talk/gossip about Brando, his role in the film, the salary he was paid (which set a record at the time, IIRC) and how fat he had gotten.

I promise you young'uns, twenty seconds after Brando first appeared onscreen (dimly lit and nearly invisible) audiences completely forgot all that bullshit they'd been hearing for months, and were mesmerized. You forgot the name "Brando" and were simply transfixed by Kurtz. Brando brought it; Sheen brought it; Duvall--everyone in the cast, famous and obscure alike, was top-notch. And Coppola was never better.

Posted by: Jerce at May 9, 2010 12:45 AM

This film had me from the opening scene.
"Saigon, shit. I'm still only in Saigon."
It's perfect.
One of my all time favorite movies.
It isn't about Vietnam, It's about war.

Posted by: Kent Silvas at May 9, 2010 11:17 AM

Great review of one of the all time classics.

The most misused word on the internet is "pretentious". The fact that AN demands your full attention and commitment for three hours does not make it pretentious. The more you study it and the closer you look, the more there is to see. For that reason, I also strongly prefer the Redux.

It is a seductively evil mind fuck of a movie that doesn't just look down its nose at the brutality of war the way every other war film does. (Which to be clear is certainly a worthy thing to do.) Instead it sucks you in with its beauty and brutality to where you lose your grip on the most black and white sense of morality that civilized people take for granted. It grabs you by the throat and doesn't let go. By the third act, you may not be cheering the horrific events on screen (there is zero glorification) but you understand how people that look and sound just like you could be warped to the point of carrying out such atrocities.

The scene where Johnson, the surfer, relaxes in the sun drenched river after they machine gunned the boat hiding the puppy comes to mind. It's both stunningly beautiful and disturbingly evil.

By the time you meet Kurtz, you've seen enough shit that the guy actually makes sense. And that realization can scare the hell out of you.

When you watch the US Troops burn the village and rape the natives in Platoon, you think, "What horrible people." And rightfully so. The viewer is above the chaos, able to condemn the horror. But AN looks deeper into the psychotic nature of war and illustrates to the viewer that even an Eagle Scout from Hometown, USA (someone just like you)is capable of pure evil when they are removed from the moral infrastructure of civilization and dropped into the jungle. It's not that the US foreign policy or the actions of American troops in Vietnam were the villains. It was that any well intended morality or "good guy" complex that they may have had withered next to the reality of guerrilla combat.

Damn it. I've gone on too long. Sorry for rambling.

As great as the first two Godfathers are, AN has them beat by leaps and bounds. It is Coppola's ultimate masterpiece.

Well, that and Jack.

Posted by: BWest at May 9, 2010 11:29 PM

Excellent, thoughtful review of what I consider to be one of the best films of all time. The moral quandary of war persists today (my ex, while in Iraq, used to jokingly refer to himself as Kurtz... at least I think he was joking).

Love love Duvall in the movie and the opening scene with Willard in his hotel room, naked and freaking out. Apparently, Sheen really did get wasted and punch the hell out of that mirror. He wanted the experience to be as real as possible.

Coppola nailed this one. And you nailed this review. *slow clap*

Posted by: Adrienne Saia at May 10, 2010 1:03 PM

One of the finest films ever made. And the most quotable. "Never get out of the boat."

But, the only thing I liked about REDUX was I got to see it on the big screen. The helicopter attack on the beach, "Fuckin' savages" with the Ride of the Valkyries "It scares the Hell out of the Slopes!" in the theater was worth the price of admission alone.

The surf board scene was ridiculous. "Charlie don't surf." Willard wouldn't play a practical joke. Willard wouldn't bond with these guys. Willard wouldn't laugh. Willard had a mission. Period. And his mission was up-river. He had no use for the men in the boat, he had no use for Kilogre "Some day this war is gonna end" or anyone else, except to complete his mission. "All I ever wanted was another mission, and for my sins, they gave me one."

The plantation scene would be great, in another movie. Didn't think it fit, just a distraction.

Don't get me wrong, but I love Playboy Bunnies boobs, but the scene in the helicopters in the rain was pointless.

The extended conversation with Kurtz, was the only good addition in REDUX.

But, the original edit is about perfect. As was this review. Still think the best Pajiba review is for "Sling Blade".

"PBR Street gang, this is almighty. Over."
"PBR Street gang, this is almighty. Over."
"PBR Street gang, this is almighty. Over."

Posted by: Bill Mc at May 26, 2010 2:04 AM

Had to go to IMDB and read all the "memorable quotes", I was a word off here and there, but makes me anxious to see the movie again. Have to find some time this weekend...

"even the jungle wanted him dead."

Posted by: Bill Mc at May 26, 2010 2:20 AM

deistbrawler needs his meds. Apocalypse Now is one of the best movies ever made.

but what do i know im just a little man, im a little man, hes a great man... I mean, no I cant I shoulda ah been ah pair of ragged claws shuttling across floors of silent seas

Posted by: Joeythearms at July 10, 2010 2:21 AM