web
counter
 

An Unofficial Sixth Sense Reboot

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (37)



passengerspubb.jpg

If you look at the Hollywood studio system. producers are — by far — the dumbest people in that city. Producers will greenlight anything (a Cliffhanger reboot? Come on!). Actors, actresses and their agents are not always that smart when it comes to choosing roles, and there are plenty of untalented directors. But it’s the producers that put together a movie and, ultimately, pay for the cast. Most people below the producer level are guaranteed a paycheck whether the movie succeeds or not, so they don’t have too much to lose — especially if they are already established — by making a bad movie. So, while you can blame incompetent direction and bad actressin’ on those people, it’s ultimately the boneheaded producers that put everything in motion.

If producers are the dumbest people in Hollywood, you have to credit the people in marketing and distribution for, perhaps, being the smartest. They know the audience, and they have an almost magical ability to spin shit into gold. It’s marketing and distribution, after all, that made turds like The Fantastic Four and even Wolverine big hits. The marketing and distribution folks can crank out the right promotional campaigns and cut a nice trailer and compel huge audiences to see a movie they’re ultimately going to be disappointed in. They’re all bastards, but they’re wily bastards.

But what if the folks in marketing and distribution look at your movie and say, “There is nothing we can do with this; let’s release it straight to DVD and try to recoup a few dollars for the producer.” These people can sell Kate Hudson romantic comedies, so you know if they don’t have enough faith to release it into theaters that it’s a losing proposition. Can you name a single straight-to-DVD movie in recent memory that was good? Decent? I’m not sure they exist. And now that video stores are all but dead, you can’t even be lured into watching a movie because you see a familiar face on the DVD box cover, so I’m not even sure who sees these movies.

Passengers is the latest such release, a movie that might have drawn in a few people if they spotted a box cover with Anne Hathaway and Patrick Wilson. But with no promotion and a straight-to-DVD release, there seems to be no real financial incentive to releasing it at all. It’s certainly not going to develop a word-of-mouth following. It’s horrible. IT’s so slow-moving and inert, I’d be surprised if the few people who pick it up even manage to finish the whole thing.

Passengers is another really bad M. Night Shyamalan knock-off, which is saying something considering how bad the actual M. Night Shyamalan movies are these days. In fact, to even suggest that there’s a twist ending in Passengers more or less gives the movie away if you’ve been watching it more than 20 minutes. Anne Hathaway stars as a shrink hired by an airline to grief counsel the surviving members of a plane crash. During the course of her therapy sessions, she learns that her patients have differing accounts of the plane crash, which she seeks to investigate thinking that if she can nail down the actual events leading up to the crash, her patients can move on with their lives.

However, mysterious people keep popping up out of nowhere, and her patients keep disappearing on her. She also starts to fall in love with one of the patients played by Patrick Wilson, who is strangely undisturbed by the fact that he just survived a plane crash that killed most of the passengers. Meanwhile, Hathaway’s character obstinately refuses to catch on to what’s going on around her, and for good reason, as is later revealed.

Passengers is a set-up movie. Clearly, the twist ending — from Ronnie Christensen — was written first, and everything seems to work backwards from it. Unfortunately, there’s not a lot to do between the plane crash that opens the movie and the ridiculous twist, so most of the movie mostly amounts to standing around and talking, and on developing the relationship between Hathaway and Wilson’s character in an excruciating length of time, all the moreso because the Sixth-Sensian twist is so obvious, you’re left restlessly awaiting the inevitable. The director, Rodrigo García, doesn’t do the narrative any favors by so obviously telegraphing the end, though he does get decent performances out of Hathaway and Wilson, as well as the solid supporting cast, including David Morse, Andre Braugher, Dianne Wiest, and Clea DuVall. It’s a well-performed movie, even if it is a slow-paced and dull one.

But the biggest problem with Passengers is not the direction, the acting, or even the script. The biggest problem is that it’s a movie that should’ve never been made in the first place. One of the ten producers on board should’ve been smart enough never to greenlight it in the first place. But that’s like asking a monkey not to fling its own poo. A producer sees a script and is so blown away by the fact that there are words on a page (“Look! Look! Words on a page!), I suspect they can’t help but pull out their wallets.









Best Sitcom Floozy | Lindsay Lohan to Star In The Other Side













Comments

not like the Sixth Sense.. more like The Others

Posted by: Ted at May 14, 2009 4:37 PM

So what's the twist? She sees dead people? Because she's dead?

I haven't seen this movie. I have no intention of seeing this movie. I bet money I'm right.

As far as The 6th Sense was concerned. POSSIBLE SPOILER I knew Bruce Willis died when he was killed in the first 5 minutes of the film. I watched the whole damn thing waiting for the TWIST ending, only to find out he was dead. I already knew that. The trailer already told me the kid saw dead people like 150 times. It was obvious. Where's the twist?

Posted by: BWeaves at May 14, 2009 4:39 PM

Yeah, I never want to see these movies but I always want to know the twist. I demand spoilers!

Posted by: Geetch at May 14, 2009 4:49 PM

She's dead right, Hathaway, she's dead or dying and the film is her sort of last vision or like, Limbo before she moves on or some such stupid shit?
Hathaway is too decent an actress for shit like this, but she has a bubblegum/popcorn quality to her that I think allows for it, she isn't ..Undeep, but she's no Meryl, shall we say.

But Patrick Wilson? There is NO excuse. Come on Night Owl/Paedophile who got pwned by Juno/Mortal enemy of Sam Jackson some how!!! YOU'RE ABOVE THIS NOW!!

Posted by: Nadine at May 14, 2009 4:53 PM

She died in the plane crash, Geetch. (This is 100% speculation but I think I can safely assume it)

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at May 14, 2009 4:56 PM

"...But the biggest problem with Passengers is not the direction, the acting, or even the script. The biggest problem is that it’s a movie that should’ve never been made in the first place..."


------------------------------------------------

Ah, sorry but NO, this is what the masses want. It is FUN! It has been clearly proven the last week by the ticket buying public and the movie lovers on this site that what they WANT is this type of recycled shit.

So suck it up.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 14, 2009 4:56 PM

BWeaves, I bet it's Patrick Wilson who's dead, but it doesn't sound like it really matters.

Posted by: Se7en2 at May 14, 2009 4:57 PM

So I went ahead and just Wiki'd it to find out the end, and yeah, it's dumb.

BUT! then I Wiki'd Patrick Wilson to see if there were any movies of his I hadn't seen yet, and I found out that he was the guy in that dumbass dancing Gap commercial with Claire Danes. Fun facts! I do love to learn.

Posted by: Courtney at May 14, 2009 5:14 PM

I'm going for "main character is actually one of the dead or dying passengers of a plane crash". It might have worked if Shamalyan had done it as one of his first two flicks, but now ... not so much.

Posted by: Neodiogenes at May 14, 2009 5:15 PM

Just what I need, another reason to dislike Anne Hathaway. The rest of the cast I love, and I liked The Sixth Sense, but the fact that she's in it and that it's the same damn movie says all I need to know about this movie. Well, how far away I should avoid it.

Posted by: Kamikaze Feminist at May 14, 2009 5:16 PM

Ah, Wikipedia. I'm always disappointed when no one has written a blow-by-blow account of a movie's plot and I'm forced to actually do some research to satisfy my curiosity.

Posted by: Geetch at May 14, 2009 5:25 PM

I'm with you, Kamikaze Fem. I can't stand her acting or her Bratz-like face. As far as I'm concerned, we've all been done a favor.

As for Patrick Wilson, I haven't seen that many of his movies, but does he ever play anything besides the blandly handsome moron/naif? The guy is like a less interesting William Hurt -- and I don't find Hurt at all interesting.

Posted by: jimbob at May 14, 2009 5:31 PM

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3id56fc6d97f8a77c11bf0663ee77f3f22


Hey what ya know, Another reboot!

And it's all thanks to ....YOU!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 14, 2009 5:48 PM

Goddam it, why can't for once, FOR ONE TIME, the "twist" be a bunch of naked ladies writhing about on a tarp covered in baby oil?

Make it happen, Shalamadoo!

Posted by: Skitz at May 14, 2009 6:06 PM

Shouldn't the term "remake" be being used for this and then the "Fright Night" thing?

Posted by: Jay at May 14, 2009 6:29 PM

i, too, wiki'd it. sad.

i wish studios would use a more-blatantly mad-libbed technique, just to infuse *some* originality to these things.
like, anna hathaway is a -tiger trainer- sent to -albania- to -pick farm fresh tomotoes-, but when she -forklifts- an innocent -pocketbook-, she begins to see that everyone around her are actually -raisins- and the fate of -microbiology- is in her -coose-.

Posted by: gp at May 14, 2009 6:38 PM

Per Wiki:
The film was released in 125 theaters on October 24, 2008 and earned $172,544 on the opening weekend.[2] As of February 2009, the film grossed total of $2,763,289 which comprised of $292,437 in domestic location and $2,470,852 in overseas locations.

This movie was actually released...apparently no one noticed in the US.

Posted by: James at May 14, 2009 6:42 PM

Ah, sorry but NO, this is what the masses want. It is FUN! It has been clearly proven the last week by the ticket buying public and the movie lovers on this site that what they WANT is this type of recycled shit.

So this is what we have to look forward to for the next few months: a temper tantrum from a supposed grown man over a movie he didn't like. If I didn't know any better, I would swear this was Benjamin Button all over again.

Do you even hear how you sound? "How dare they have FUN at that movie I hated! I cannot stand for it!!!!" It is really quite pathetic.

And really, you are picking weak ass movies to defend your position with. If you really think CLiffhanger and Shyamalan are anywhere near as "sacred" as Star Trek, then you are proving how sorry ass a fan you are.

Sorry to go off topic, but this movie ain't that interesting, and he was just being so damn asinine....I couldn't resist. I do apologize.

Posted by: Vermillion at May 14, 2009 7:06 PM

Does 'Late Last Night' count as straight to DVD? I know it was on Starz first, but if so, I nominate it as a good straight to DVD release.

Posted by: J Stride at May 14, 2009 7:19 PM

HA!

Hahahahaha

You just can't help yourself, can you.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 14, 2009 7:31 PM

Oh, and that movie is STILL a piece of shit. A year from now people will be scratching their heads wondering, WHAT THE FUCK were we thinking!?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 14, 2009 7:33 PM

What are you talking about? Seriously? I have no idea what the whole point of this ranting and raving of yours is supposed to serve! Do you honestly think you are proving a point?

Posted by: Vermillion at May 14, 2009 7:40 PM

gp, you fucking rule. I WANT TO SEE THAT MOVIE.

Posted by: AM at May 14, 2009 10:04 PM

OMG seriously? Still with the Star Trek thing?

I need to go look up the ending to this movie, but I REALLY want to see the one gp mad-libbed. I love it!

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at May 14, 2009 10:57 PM

OMG DUMB.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at May 14, 2009 10:58 PM

thank you, but it was nothing, really. i must admit i guessed on how one might spell "coose".
that *still* doesn't look right. i mean, i coulda easily had said 'cooter' or whatnot, hell even 'whatnot' but maybe with a cooler spelling, but damnit, i'm gonna stick by my coose.

and hopefully that will be the last time i ever type that sentence.

Posted by: gp at May 15, 2009 12:07 AM

I watched it online and i couldn't even get halfway through it, i kept losing patience/focus and signing on facebook. facebook was better than this movie. for shame patrick wilson, for shame.

Posted by: citizen_cris at May 15, 2009 12:16 AM

1 - No, I LOVE Star Trek
2 - No, I love STAR TREK
1 - No, I LOVE Star Trek
2 - No, I love STAR TREK
BSlim, your hatred is a bountiful river that runs right through this beautiful site. If you're looking for a "love for a TV/movie franchise remake/reboot that makes tons of money that breeds copycats" movie, I recommend . . . shit. I got nothin'.
But the Star Trek movie was niiiccceee.

Posted by: Kballs at May 15, 2009 12:29 AM

Andre Braugher got sucked into this?

*weeps in a corner*

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at May 15, 2009 1:40 AM

@ gp:

The standard accepted spelling is "cooze". However, the judges would also have accepted "cootch", "cooter", "vagooter", or "Miss China".

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at May 15, 2009 9:06 AM

thank you AvB, i *knew* YOU wouldn't let me down.

i actually struggled with the z/s for all of a minute, and then figured it didn't really matter.

unless your last name is minelli.

(oh gross, i just caught myself singing "it's cooze with a z, not coose with a s, cuz cooze with a z goes zzz not sss...)

Posted by: gp at May 15, 2009 9:42 AM

Skitz: "Goddam it, why can't for once, FOR ONE TIME, the "twist" be a bunch of naked ladies writhing about on a tarp covered in baby oil?"

Unfortunately, your "twist" was the actual climax to "Manos: The Hands of Fate."

Posted by: BWeaves at May 15, 2009 9:44 AM

The director of this trash is Gabriel Garcia Marquez' son.

Clearly not a chip off the old block?

Posted by: missh at May 15, 2009 11:26 AM

gp I stick with "hot pocket" or "beef curtains."

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at May 15, 2009 1:16 PM

[quick spoiler check on imdb]
Soooo...AnneHath's first foray into mutual necrophelia gets a PG13 rating? No nudity even? Anne, we've been over this. Your no-nudity stance is bad enough, but coupling it with a shitty show is going to put a strain on our relationship.

I'm going to have to go watch Havoc now. I hope you're happy.

Posted by: lordhelmet at May 15, 2009 3:44 PM

"They know the audience, and they have an almost magical ability to spin shit into gold."

Not very hard, considering the intellect of an average movie goer.

Posted by: Arthur Dent at May 15, 2009 10:15 PM

Question: In the last couple of minutes it seems like Anne's character is remembering all the times with Patrick's character. I saw this as in those long horrible minutes falling to earth she dreamed/created these memories with him? Or am I overthinking?

Posted by: Lorri at May 16, 2009 10:19 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time