web
counter
 

Mars Needs Moms Review: It Doesn’t Take A Village (Especially Not This One)

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (20)



marsmoms2.jpg

Somewhere within the useless mess of Mars Needs Moms lies a half-hearted message about the importance of the family unit and how, when it comes to raising children in an optimal environment, fathers are just as important as mothers. Oddly, Walt Disney Pictures chose to portray this essence of humanity by bringing its actors to life (in a manner of wishful thinking, anyway) through the performance-capture fetish of producer Robert Zemeckis (director of such hellish visual creations as The Polar Express, Beowulf, and A Christmas Carol) and his ImageMovers Digital studio. The end result is, at best, entirely creepy and, at worst, an utter disaster of filmmaking.

Director Simon Wells and his co-screenwriter, Wendy Wells, adapt the children’s novel by Berkeley Breathed, but the story only outlines a threadbare foundation that serves to spur the plot into action. Like most human children, young Milo (based upon the movements of Seth Green and voiced by Seth Dusky) takes issue with his upbringing. Dad (Tom Everett Scott) is largely absent due to work commitments, and Mom (Joan Cusack, who should know better) is so inhumane as to ask him to take out the trash and eat his broccoli. One evening, Milo’s frustration comes to a boiling point, and he yells that his life would be easier without his Mom, who weeps in response. Well, Milo quickly regrets this choice of words when an alien spaceship arrives and rips Mom out of bed, so he scampers onto the ship and soon finds himself on Mars.

Once on the foreign planet, Milo figures out what’s going on from Gribble (Dan Fogler), an insufferable manchild that followed his own mother to Mars a few decades ago in a similar manner. It seems that Martian babies hatch from the ground, and the adults don’t know how to care for them, so the planet’s ancient matriarch named Supervisor (Mindy Sterling) periodically kidnaps Earthling mothers and steals their consciousness to program Nannybots. Milo convinces Gribble to find help him save his Mom, and the duo finds unexpected aid from a friendly girl Martian, Ki (Elisabeth Harnois), who learned English from intercepting an Earthling television show (let’s just call it “That 60s Show”) and lives her life as a rogue graffiti artist who dreams of free love and flower power. Together, the three outsiders must work together to not only save Milo’s Mom but also transform the planetary outlook. Yes, it’s just as insipid as it sounds.

Naturally, the plot and all of its surrounding details are entirely preposterous; but, to be fair, the movie doesn’t really give a shit about realism in terms of a believable story. Of course, this shunning of realism doesn’t exactly line up with the chosen visual medium; as per its usual method, the performance-capture animation in this movie generates horrific “lifelike” animated humans with zombie-like movements and soulless eyes. However, such incongruities mean absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of Mars Needs Moms, which puts action first with added afterthoughts of overwrought sentimentality and very little consideration to suspending disbelief. On the contrary, for the human characters travel easily to and from Mars by way of a wormhole, and the Martian landscape itself is alternately littered with heaps of trash and gorgeous, free-flowing bodies of water. At least the filmmakers got the low gravity detail correct, but this trifling bit of accuracy is only permitted to exist in this movie because it presumably appeals to small children.

Speaking of audience engagement, who the hell ever decided that Dan “Grapefruit Masturbator” Fogler was the ideal candidate to star in a children’s film? With much dismay, it must be noted that his animated character most accurately resembles the actor’s physical self. Even worse, the audience is saddled with Fogler’s unstoppable voice as he rambles through a constant stream of verbal diarrhea, including such treasured 1980s pop culture references as Top Gun jokes and a speech about how Mars is the “red planet” because it’s a perfect example of the destruction that “interplanetary communism” has wrought. Quite simply, there’s no audience for this garbage, for the adults don’t care and the kids are too busy looking forward to the next chase scene. Indeed, the few bits of adrenaline rush on display are the only semi-remarkable parts of this movie, which is barely passable when the visuals confine themselves to the faux-Martian landscapes and shots featuring the aliens and spacecrafts. Otherwise, Mars Needs Moms is an incongruous display of inhumanity to which your really kids needn’t be exposed.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Justin Timberlake Makes A Big Mistake. Huge. | 115 Reasons Why We Love Joss Whedon's "Buffy The Vampire Slayer" Part II









Comments

It's the eyes, those dark, bottomless, shark eyes.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at March 12, 2011 3:53 PM

Berke, we're not holding you responsible. 'Nuff said.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at March 12, 2011 4:20 PM

(based upon the movements of Seth Green and voiced by Seth Dusky)

A joke, right? Gotta be a joke.

And you're quite right, Idiosynchronic, we won't hold it against Mr. Breathed. Although I may channel Bill the Cat and say "PBBBBPTH!" to this so-called movie.

Posted by: The Wanderer at March 12, 2011 4:47 PM

Wow people REALLY hate Dan Fogler.

Interesting.

Posted by: grace b at March 12, 2011 4:54 PM

I've been repulsed by the animation of this movie in every trailer I've seen (not that I've sought them out but I keep seeing them on TV). I'm glad I'm not the kind of mom who lets her kids drag her to crappy movies (not that my kids have shown any interest in this dreck, anyway).

Posted by: pickled tink at March 12, 2011 4:55 PM

Oh, Opus. At least you were left out of this shandeh.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at March 12, 2011 5:42 PM

I just can't understand the hate for Dan Fogler. Chris Farley was 10 times more annoying.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at March 12, 2011 6:19 PM

Yurgh. I should have guessed this monstrosity was motion-cap, because nothing in the world can make animation looking uglier than that crap. When will that fad just die? Maybe if this bombs completely and then Tin Tin does as well (and it probably will because of how hideous it will be), we'll finally be rid of this blight upon the world.

And I wish animators would stop trying to make humans realistic. You can't. You just can't. Either exaggerate the features or do it live action. I think it's a big part of why I didn't like the ending to Toy Story 3: Andy just looked creepy as all hell, because he was this bizarre mix of realistic and fake. Uncanny valley, begone!

Posted by: figgy at March 12, 2011 7:36 PM

I'm not suprised. Motion capture always ends up looking vaugely unsettling. I can't stand it. The whole point of animation is that you can make characters whimiscal and diffrent from real life.

Posted by: camytaru at March 12, 2011 9:28 PM

Sometimes computer programmers dream about creating something that no one in the real world cares about.

This is one of those dreams/nightmares.

Posted by: OldSchool60 at March 12, 2011 9:49 PM

this is the company that is now in control of pixar (help me god)

Posted by: Ja Ja Ja at March 13, 2011 12:01 AM

Am I the only one who, upon hearing the name of this piece of shit, immediately flash on that old classic "Mars Needs Women".

I was turned off from the beginning and have no plans on subjecting myself to this. Glad I made that decision early and avoided the rush.

Posted by: Uncle JR at March 13, 2011 10:08 AM

Every time I see an ad or a preview for this, I think it's called "Mars Needs Milfs". And that makes much more sense.

Posted by: Jim Doggie at March 13, 2011 11:10 AM

This is the movie that got Robert Zemeckis's mo-cap studio (aka "The Nightmare Factory") shut down.

Disney doesn't "control" Pixar, it's more the other way around, in terms of animation. So breathe easy.


Posted by: bbcrae at March 13, 2011 1:23 PM

Jesus Christ, that's one of the most unsettling pictures I've seen.

Adblock is my friend!

Posted by: Aislinn at March 13, 2011 1:50 PM

I hope you're right when you say this killed his studio. That mo-cap nastiness is just horrible. Anyone who can make Tom Hanks scary is either a genius or just bad.

I'm not sure where I read it, but there's a theory about fake humans that goes like this:
If it's perfect (which we can't do yet) it works.
If it's cartoony it works.
But if it's just very nearly almost perfect it fails utterly.

Something about our brains seeing "real" people who have something wrong with them that our brains can't quite identify. Subconsciously we perceive them as being flawed or diseased or broken and are instinctively distressed or turned off by them.

Posted by: Protoguy at March 13, 2011 6:30 PM

Think that's the Uncanny Valley theory thing, Protoguy.

http://www.damninteresting.net/content/uncanny_valley_graph.gif

Explains why I get so freaked out everytime I see David Gest. Which is suprisingly often.

Posted by: zeke the pig at March 14, 2011 6:07 AM

$6 million opening weekend on a budget of $150 million?
Holyshit!!!??? It is going to take over 20 years in dvd sales to recoup production costs.

They could have made this into an r-rated porn for the web and made plenty more than 6mil.

Posted by: Billbo at March 14, 2011 9:44 AM

"I just can't understand the hate for Dan Fogler. Chris Farley was 10 times more annoying."

Yeah, but Chris Farley died and it is now illegal or something to publicly admit he was pretty damn annoying.

Posted by: Craig at March 14, 2011 10:12 AM

Yeah, the box office receipts for this junk fill me with joy. The death bell tolls for that motion-capture bullshit, and I couldn't be happier.

Posted by: figgy at March 14, 2011 1:43 PM