web
counter
 

Hall Pass Review: The Most Depressing Comedy of the Year

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (41)



Hall-Pass-new-trailer.jpg

In 1996, Wes Anderson directed a small, little seen moved called Bottle Rocket that he co-wrote with his best friend Owen Wilson, who also starred in the film with his brother, Luke. Based on a short film of the same name that was a huge success at Sundance, the feature version of Bottle Rocket would tank commercially before being saved from obscurity by a legions of film critics and a small but clever audience that appreciated great storytelling and a unique voice, not to mention an MTV Movie Award to Anderson for Best New Filmmaker, maybe the last award the network has given a deserving filmmaker. Martin Scorsese even called Bottle Rocket one of the ten best films of the 90s. The success of Bottle Rocket had as much to do with Owen Wilson as it did Wes Anderson: In his character, Dignon, Wilson created this remarkable blend of deadpan and enthusiasm, a voice that felt new and vibrant and alive. When the movie finally found its audience, when Scorsese hailed it, when it later led to Rushmore, Owen Wilson must have felt elated. Like he and Anderson could someday stamp a permanent mark on Hollywood, that they would forge ahead with their unique vision, that they would infect the world with their quirky indie sensibility, and bring it to the masses.

Fifteen years and three Fockers movies, Marmaduke, Marley & Me, and an attempted suicide later, Owen Wilson is starring as a middle-aged Applebee’s schlub in Hall Pass, the latest in a series of misfires from The Farrelly Brothers, whose recent efforts include two of the worst films of the last decade, Heartbreak Kid and Fever Pitch.

If that’s not profoundly depressing, I don’t know what is. I wonder if Owen Wilson gave up on his dreams before or after You, Me & Dupree?

What’s more depressing is how painfully mediocre Hall Pass is. Before Judd Apatow and the bromance came along, the Farrelly Brothers once owned the comedy world, nailing the comedy hat trick with Dumb and Dumber, Kingpin and There’s Something About Mary (and to a lesser extent, Me, Myself, and Irene). But there has always been a sweetness underlying the Farrelly Brothers work — best evidenced in their script for Outside Providence — but it’s that sweetness that continues to undermine their efforts. They seem determined to mine the warmth and gentleness at the heart of their characters while maintaining the vulgar comedic sensibility that made them so popular. But the two don’t mix. They cancel each other out, and the result in Hall Pass is the same as it was in Stuck On You: A film that is neither funny enough to satisfy those looking for a good comedy, or sweet enough to satisfy a romantic-comedy demographic.

Hall Pass ends up being a muddled, schizophrenic mess, a few vintage Farrelly gags (and a couple that are even quite funny) diluted by the film’s predictable themes. Owen Wilson and Jason Sudekis star as Rick and Fred, respectively, a real estate agent and insurance salesman both so mired in loving, secure marriages that they are unable to appreciate because of their dicks. Their wives — Maggie (Jenna Fischer) and Grace (Christina Applegate) — are also frustrated with both their gawking at other women and their delusions in thinking that, if they were only single, they’d be hitting this or that every night of the week.

After a couple of embarrassing incidents — a conversation about large-mouth vaginas that is being watched on closed circuit cameras by their wives (and an assortment of other people, including Alyssa Milano with fake breasts) and another, where Fred is caught by the police masturbating in his mini-van (two of the film’s biggest highlights) — the wives grant Fred and Rick a hall pass, a week off from marriage to do as they choose under the belief that it will only make them appreciate their marriages even more. Naïveté, of course, is the soul of the studio comedy.

The results are expected: In reality, middle-aged men are all talk and little action, and in a watered-down, studio-comedy kind of way, the Farrelly’s capture a few familiar truths, like 40-year-old men are far more likely to take advantage of a week off from marriage to nap than to bang the babysitter. But the Farrelly’s efforts to satirize suburban life are toothless, and the film eventually beats a predictable path down to Sappy Town, where Fischer and Applegate — filmed in such a way as to make them look a decade older — are waiting with open arms.

Hall Pass is not a complete waste, however. There are a few gags that take you by surprise, like a woman who sneezes with hilariously unexpected results. Early in the film, Sudeikis also hits a few high notes, riffing on the advantages of real breasts over fake ones, the joys of classic rock and masturbation, and the art of fake cunnilingus. But aside from a couple of Jackass moments, it all feels prefabricated, designed to hit that homogeneous sweet spot between both the lazy unthinking studio-tested male and female demographic.

It’ll probably do gangbusters on DVD. But I hope when Owen Wilson is sitting in between two sacks of money, re-watching Bottle Rocket over a couple of drinks, he finally remembers what brought him to the profession in the first place: A desire to make something both meaningful and entertaining, something with which he could be proud and not another tepid comedy about middle-aged malaise, forgotten somewhere between The Freebie and Old Dogs.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Cedar Rapids Review: It's Hard to be a Saint in the City | Determining the Oscar Winners in the Acting Categories Based on the Pajiba Scale of UGLY SEXY CRAZY









Comments

I honestly can't imagine how this got green lighted. The premise is so incredibly deplorable.

Posted by: JuiceinLA at February 25, 2011 4:05 PM

I just don't get why this is called "Hall Pass". It should be "Kitchen Pass". I've never used the phrase "hall pass" for anything outside of high school. Yes, the premise is kind of deplorable, but I was hoping the Farrely Brothers were going to make a comeback. Too bad this is as crappy as it looked.

Posted by: TylerDFC at February 25, 2011 4:18 PM

He has screenwriting credits, so why can't Owen Wilson just WRITE himself out of his career predicament? Couldn't he just look out on the friscalating Hawaiian dusklight and create his own film?

The premise of this movie sounds like a 17 year old's perception of marriage.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at February 25, 2011 4:23 PM

Maybe I just have a soft spot for Jimmy Fallon, but I didn't think Fever Pitch was awful....

Posted by: Allen at February 25, 2011 4:24 PM

this movie sounds like a 17 year old's perception of marriage.

That's exactly what I keep thinking when I see the trailers.

Posted by: Paultera at February 25, 2011 4:39 PM

And on the day that the words "damning with faint praise" were redefined by Allen, we all stood in awe and watched.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at February 25, 2011 4:40 PM

If you want to enjoy a movie called "Fever Pitch", watch the original with Colin Firth. Accept no imitations.

Posted by: PaddyDog at February 25, 2011 4:53 PM

friscalating Hawaiian dusklight

I love you, Ms. Julien.

Just thought I'd tell you again.

Posted by: MM at February 25, 2011 5:04 PM

I loved Mary. I howled at Dumb and Dumber.
But they kinda lost me with "Irene". I think they might still have something but I don't know that I am that interested in seeing it. Maybe I am growing up after all.

Posted by: Odnon. at February 25, 2011 5:04 PM

I don't care. I fucking love Stephen Merchant and by the power of Zeus I will see this terrible movie for that reason.

Posted by: stacey nosek at February 25, 2011 5:20 PM

I went and looked up Owen Wilson on IMDB. Just to see if you were exagerating. At first I was like, "B-but look! Life Aquatic! Royal Tenenbaums! Fantastic Mr. Fox!"

Then I felt sad again becuase unless he's in a Wes Anderson movie, he is doing the worst movies imaginable.

Now. To research Luke Wilson.

Posted by: superasente at February 25, 2011 5:33 PM

I wonder if Owen Wilson gave up on his dreams before or after You, Me & Depree?

Considering that he did Shanghai Noon not too long after blowing up, I'd say his dreams have been all but achieved.

Nah, that isn't fair. He's brilliant with good material (and/or when he gives a damn). I'll bet he considers it a "one for them, one for me" deal. Except the "ones for them" are outpacing the "ones for me" at an exhausting rate. Maybe it's Wes Anderson's fault? Clearly, he should just make more movies.

Posted by: RobP at February 25, 2011 5:53 PM

a) Good point made up there about Wes Anderson because I was literally about to chime in with "but. . .but. . .The Darjeeling Limited !"

b) I never liked the Farrelly Brothers. . .not once. . .until that thing I just read up there about them writing Outside Providence. That's an underappreciated gem, mandingo.

c) Mrs. J. makes sly Patton Oswalt and Royal Tenenbaums references in one day. Which is why she is both a treasure and a. . .wild. . .cat.

Posted by: coveredinbees at February 25, 2011 6:16 PM

Rawr

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at February 25, 2011 6:27 PM

Mrs. Julien is a commonly named little league sports team? That explains so, so much.

@Odnon: I'm with you, the Farrely's lost me after Irene. I laughed at one joke in that movie: When Jim Carrey wakes up in the hotel room, goes to pee, and asks a mortified Renee Zelleweger why he can't control his stream. Funny because it's true. Nothing else in that movie is remotely true.

Which is the direct opposite of Outside Providence. Like coveredinbees said, that is a true underappreciated gem. Especially if you like Alex Baldwin doing his best Nor'Eastah accent.

"You hit ah pahhked cahp cahr?!"

Posted by: RobP at February 25, 2011 6:42 PM

Oh, I'm common alright.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at February 25, 2011 6:45 PM

stacey I love Stephen Merchant too and is that Richard Jenkins I see in a bar scene? But that won't be enough to make me pay to see it in a theater.

Mayyyybeee I'll catch it on HBO whenever it makes it there.

Posted by: mswas at February 25, 2011 7:05 PM

So, I have a few questions. I've only seen the trailer and am extremely unlikely to see this, so here goes:

1. The wives allow their husbands to cheat on this one week pass? Are condoms discussed? Because even if you're ok with your spouse getting some strange, very few people are ok with getting chlamydia, herpes or HIV.

2. Do the wives give themselves a pass, too?

3. If so, wouldn't the dumb ass husbands have realized it'll be a lot easier for the women to score than the men? Wouldn't the husbands have called it off at that point?

4. If not, what the fuck is wrong with these women?

5. Even if so, what the fuck is wrong with these women?

Posted by: Snuggiepants at February 25, 2011 8:20 PM

I wish the movie were called "Never Mind The Dudes, What The Fuck Is Wrong With These Women?"

Posted by: coveredinbees at February 25, 2011 10:10 PM

I love Comedy's! Christ, as much as I think I hate fart jokes, I dare you to watch "The Inbetweeners" (Brit Tv Show) and not laugh yourself silly...wank!

However...

I hate everything Owen Wilson, Wes Anderson, and the Farrely Brothers, they are combined, the death of comedy. They are smarmy, obvious, telegraphed, labored, repetitive and self-congratulatory, all the things that are not funny. They are the opposite of "brilliant" (again, do yourself a favor and watch "The Inbetweeners"...hehe...wank)...

Posted by: TrickyHD at February 26, 2011 12:18 AM

If you want to enjoy a movie called "Fever Pitch", watch the original with Colin Firth. Accept no imitations.

Better actor and it's about the best club in the world. Arsenal FC.

There might be an interesting premise behind all of this but it doesn't sound like it got beyond that stage. Like, what would happen if you could get a free pass to do as you liked outside of your marriage (we could ask Andrei Kirilenko of the Utah Jazz, whose Russian supermodel wife gives him just that chance).

But in order for it to work, there has to be a sense that things won't just be going back to "normal". That's where the Farrellys seem to have lost their edge -- regardless of the 90-minute runtime, you know that the couples will get back together, happier than ever because they know that, though they are miserable married, it's worse to be miserable and alone.

Yay romance.

Posted by: Fredo at February 26, 2011 1:49 AM

fredo I couldn't agree with you more. You expect that from any and every studio comedy and there was a time when you did not expect that from the Farrellys. That just makes me sad, as do the review, and the comments. I'd like to say that I'm gonna go and watch dumb & dumber for effect, but I'm just too bumed out.

Posted by: rg at February 26, 2011 2:31 AM

As usual, snuggiepants speaks the truth.

No sane wife would do such a thing.

And let me get this straight: One of the wives in question is Christina Fucking Applegate?

Man, count your fucking blessings, motherfucker.

Posted by: , at February 26, 2011 2:39 AM

@Snuggiepants,
Getting a free pass to have some fun outside of the relationship is not crazy. It can be very helpful to life-long partnerships. However, you're absolutely right that women should get a pass too. It's just not ridiculous that people in long-term relationships need to feel "unchained" once-in-awhile. Most people just cheat without discussing it.

Posted by: John G. at February 26, 2011 3:09 AM

a real estate agent and insurance salesman both so mired in loving, secure marriages that they are unable to appreciate because of their dicks

I apologize. I originally misread that statement as "unable to appreciate because they're dicks."

My mistake.

Posted by: The Wanderer at February 26, 2011 7:23 AM

wanderer,

Why can't you both be right?

Posted by: , at February 26, 2011 11:07 AM

Women do not age well, and men need the energy of youth to keep them feeling like a pack leader. That's why when any man gets some money, he has a dumb young blonde on his arm. It's genetics, man. Don't hate.

Posted by: Darwin's Thyroid at February 26, 2011 11:37 AM

John G.: whatever melts your butter, man. However, not everyone needs to get some on the side to stay happy. If you do, and your lady is cool with it, well, rock on.

Darwin, you're full of shit. I started to elaborate on the shit that is filling you, but decided it was enough to inform you of it. You. Shit. Full.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at February 26, 2011 11:52 AM

Getting a free pass to have some fun outside of the relationship is not crazy. It can be very helpful to life-long partnerships.

Following the logic from above, it is clear you are 17 years old. This is a dumb movie about a dumber premise. A new dumb and dumber!

Posted by: sittingpat at February 26, 2011 11:56 AM

Knowing several long-married 40+ couples, I have seen variations on this scenario play out in real life. "Go ahead, have your "guys weekend out", it's fine". Then, thirty seconds after the "guy's weekend" begins, the cell phones start ringing. "Where are you now? Who's there with you? Why didn't you answer on the first ring? That's not what so & so's husband told his wife" and etc. Then, after discovering that attractive 20-something females rarely have any interest in 40+ year old married guys, they skulk home and have to pay penance for what turned out to be a weekend of sheer hell and sobering disappointment.

Posted by: waywardwayfarer at February 26, 2011 12:11 PM

20-something females rarely have any interest in 40+ year old married guys...

My father always told me, "Son. Go out with as many girls as you can while you're young. Someday you're going to have to pay your hard earned money if you want to have sex with an 18 year old."

Then he would like, punch me in the chest and send me out for cigarettes and scratch-off tickets.

Whatever. Like your childhood was ideal.

Posted by: superasente at February 26, 2011 12:34 PM

How many turds do the Farrelly Brothers have to drop before people finally admit that There's Something about Mary and Dumb and Dumber are wildly over-rated?

And what does Alyssa Milano need with fake breasts?

Posted by: The Mutt at February 26, 2011 1:47 PM

Ah, yes, yet another prime example of movie-making by focus group. I'm assuming that the entire budget was about $30-$40 million, drop-in-the-bucket chump change so that the studio didn't have to look so hard for outside backers.

Posted by: Jerry at February 26, 2011 2:55 PM

No matter how mature the couple, I can't imagine any "good for the goose, good for the gander" scenario like this that doesn't eventually end with a terrific "It's not MY fault if YOU didn't get any" dish-breaking brawl.

Posted by: , at February 26, 2011 7:14 PM

I haven't seen it; this review doesn't make me want to. Picture makes it look like classic hero's journey aka http://www.clickok.co.uk/index4.html

Posted by: Sam at February 27, 2011 12:11 PM

You rip Wilson and the Farrellys for playing it safe, giving us the same old predictable schtick. But then your favorite scenes are the ones involving whacking off and sharting...

Posted by: Huh? at February 27, 2011 2:12 PM

I wonder how many of us smartypantses wearing out our Urban Thesauruses to rip "Hall Pass" got all wet and fuzzy over "The Freebie"...

Posted by: Marty S at February 27, 2011 2:19 PM

The header pic is freaking me out. Jenna Fischer and Jason Sudeikis look so much alike they could be siblings; for that matter, so do Christina Applegate and Owen Wilson. Who's married to whom in this movie?

Posted by: Another Jen at February 27, 2011 4:30 PM

Resources this kind of as the 1 you mentioned right here will be extremely useful to myself! I’ll publish a hyperlink to this web page on my personal blog. I’m sure my site website visitors will uncover that quite helpful.

Posted by: hotel reservations at March 1, 2011 11:16 AM

If they would have replaced the lengthy penis scene with a a vagina scene, it would have been so much better.

These films are aimed at a young male audience and they choose to show male genitalia only? Cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo!

Posted by: NoDingDongs at March 6, 2011 11:57 AM

It was painful to watch Owen Wilson's fantasy about providing liquor to an ADULT WOMAN who is 20 years old, as well as hearing her in a bar after she turns 21 later on say, "I'm an adult now." Baby, if you're 21, you've been an adult for THREE YEARS NOW. I'm in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, where the age you become an adult and the drinking age are the SAME AGE - 18. And it's been that way since 1970. That's all that makes sense. A minor is someone under 18. What's it supposed to mean when the drinking age is HIGHER than the legal adult age? What is a person between 18 and 21 considered to be in the U.S.? I would have no problem whatsoever buying booze for any adults over 18, who are not minors, anywhere. My consience is clear on that one.

Posted by: Numbnuts at March 14, 2011 12:58 AM