web
counter
 

George Lucas and Christopher Nolan Remember Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope

By Drew Morton | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (25)



starwars460.jpg

My life-long obsession with movies has been driven by a handful of titles including George Lucas’s Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope (1977), Tim Burton’s Batman (1989), Steven Soderbergh’s Out of Sight (1998) and Christopher Nolan’s Memento (2000). Over the years, some of these titles have fallen by the wayside, most notably Burton’s Batman, which was trumped by Nolan’s work on the Batman saga, best illustrated by The Dark Knight (2008). Still, my amour pour le cinema holds a flame for three subjects: Batman, Star Wars, and Soderbergh. On Saturday February 19th, I got to experience two of out three (and, as Meatloaf once sang, that “ain’t bad.”): the Director’s Guild of America held a screening of Lucas’s A New Hope (yes, for all of you wondering, it was the 2004 director’s cut) with a special, hour-long Q&A with Lucas and Christopher Nolan.

The program began with a short film produced by the DGA, focusing on Lucas’s career within and without the Hollywood system. A USC film student who specialized in animation, Lucas began his career with Francis Ford Coppola’s American Zoetrope studios and a feature length version of his student film, Electronic Labyrinth: THX 1138 4EB (1967), was greenlit by Warner Brothers. Yet, Lucas’s THX 1138 (1971) was not quite the film WB had in mind: it was abstract, philosophical. It was science fiction in the same sense that Brave New World, 1984, or 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) are science-fiction. As Lucas noted during the Q&A, he wanted to use the mechanisms of film form rather than story and character to get people to rise up against the oppressions of 1970s America. Except, as he so keenly observed, no one came to see it. The film was a disaster; it ended the Zoetrope deal and Coppola was forced into directing The Godfather (1972) to try to start from scratch. When Lucas approached Coppola for advice, his early mentor said “Try something new, make a comedy.” In other words, no more philosophical space movies.

So Lucas went off to make American Graffiti (1973) and when it finally hit it big with audiences (it was one of the first films to use rely on pop music for its soundtrack), the world was his oyster. This was not so much the result of Lucas’s talents but because the Hollywood studio system had been placed in a state of disarray thanks to the death of the moguls, losing revenues, and corporate take overs. Essentially, as Lucas recalled, the people in charge of the studios were those who had absolutely no experience making movies. While, in the cases of THX 1138 and American Graffiti, this had resulted in some tension with the studios, Lucas foresaw an opportunity when he was approached by Alan Ladd Jr. at Twentieth Century Fox to make his “space opera,” then titled The Star Wars.

Lucas, as he told Nolan, originally envisioned one film: a bad guy is confronted by his son and earns redemption in the third act. Then, when the script reached 250 pages and Lucas was confronted by a modest budget (initially $8 million dollars which grew to $14), he figured he’d spin the three-act story into three separate films, just like the old Flash Gordon serials. Lucas’s sentiments have been long documented (just watch the documentary Empire of Dreams and you’ll get the bulk of what Lucas and Nolan spoke about) but the biggest reveal that I took away from the Q&A was this: Lucas is a neurotically self-conscious director. He informed Nolan that after his company Industrial, Light, and Magic had run into obstacles creating the special effects he felt necessary to tell the story, he began cutting scenes faster, driven by both artistic inspiration (Akira Kurosawa’s fast cuts and kinetic camera movements in The Seven Samurai) and pragmatism (if you pack the frame with details and leave it up for only a fraction of a second, the viewers won’t be able to see that it’s fake!).

Re-watching A New Hope, it’s easy to take that for granted. Generations X and Y have been raised on films that emulate Star Wars, so the pacing of the montage and the panning camera in the original does not seem especially fast nowadays, it feels like a crisp freeway drive: economical and visceral, but nothing out of the ordinary. I hadn’t seen A New Hope on the big screen in nearly fifteen years and it amazed me at how well so much of it still works (and at how astray the prequels look in relation). As our friend Mr. Plinkett at Red Letter Media notes in his skewering of the prequels, A New Hope draws upon Lucas’s knowledge of film form perfectly to drive home the drama. John Williams’s score captures the relentless pursuit of a small freighter (obviously the good guys!) by a menacing and sizable villain, an Imperial Star Destroyer. Regardless of the film’s opening crawl, the graphic composition of the frame tells us everything we need to know: this is a David vs. Goliath battle between two forces.

Our story’s David is Princess Leia (Carrie Fisher), a Rebel Alliance leader who has acquired the plans to the Death Star, a new weapon developed by the sinister Galactic Empire. In the opening sequence, the villainous Darth Vader (David Prowse/James Earl Jones), Goliath, dressed in his black mechanized suit, confronts her for the plans and, when he discovers that she has put them in the care of two droids, R2-D2 (Kenny Baker) and C-3PO (Anthony Daniels), he takes her prisoner.

The role of David is then left unfulfilled by the story, until the droids are acquired by a local farmboy by the name of Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill)—-God, this is torturous writing a plot synopsis to a film that 99% of people have already seen. Luke teams up with an ancient “wizard,” Obi-Wan Kenobi (Alec Guiness), a hot-shot pilot (Harrison Ford) and his walking carpet co-pilot (Peter Mayhew), and learns the ways of the magical force in order to rescue the princess, deliver the plans, and save the day. Does that suffice?

OK, so to move on to why A New Hope still works today. Lucas’s informed us of film form: Check, we covered that. Secondly, the special effects and set design. Lucas and Nolan spent a good amount of time speaking about the filmmaker’s objective of making a science fiction movie that looks lived in, natural. Up to that point, as in Kubrick’s 2001, science fiction looked clean and streamlined. Lucas wanted to change that with dirty ships that look worn down and in need of maintenance. That’s what makes the Millennium Falcon such a great joke: it looks like something from Antiques Roadshow in comparison with the crisp design of the Imperial Star Destroyers. The impression is that this is a world that is lived in and it has been for quite some time (a long time, in fact!). This is what breaks my heart about the prequels (not to stray down this road for too long…), everything looks just the opposite, hermetically sealed, too clean for general consumption. Moreover, the tangibility of plastic models over CGI gives the entire film (and sequels) a tactile quality. We can feel that there is actually something there to be engaged with and it still looks amazing, even if we can see those matte lines that Lucas seems so self-conscious about. It’s alright man! You’re not going outside with clothes on or something. Flaunt those models and blue screen sequences, baby!

Finally, I had forgotten thanks to the overly serious tone of the prequels, that A New Hope and the original trilogy can be quite funny. Obviously, it’s not a comedy, but it is never afraid of letting you have a good time. The needling of Han Solo by Princess Leia (“Either I’m going to kill her or I’m beginning to like her!”) has some elements of the quick, sharp banter of earlier Hollywood productions and the chemistry between Ford and Fisher works extremely well (even if Luke, in this installment, thinks he’s the man for his…sister). Or the simple but endearingly funny interplay between the beautiful R2-D2 and the snobish ass C-3PO. The film never takes itself so seriously that it is oblivious to what it is: an homage to those serials that Lucas loved so much, a sci-fi adventure with some philosophical elements folded in. The prequels seem dour in comparison, lifeless, like looking at a wax museum imitation of an organic lifeform.

Re-watching a film that has defined much of my life — as I am a geek thanks to Batman and Star Wars — through the eyes of a more seasoned moviegoer, I started to notice a few flaws on this masterpiece. Yet, unlike Lucas, I don’t want to shun them or push them away. There’s something endearing about the awkwardness of some of the lines of dialogue (“Ben Kenobi? I don’t think he exists anymore.”) and to Hamill’s over the top, spoiled brat routine in the first act. Sure, it’s hitting the nose on the head when Luke angerly kicks the sand at his feet on Tatooine but then Lucas gives us a perfect moment: Luke, looking at the sunset, the Williams score swelling, and coming to the realization that he is just a small part of the universe. That scene, after nearly thirty-five years since it was shot and, to my knowledge, never digitally altered, still gave me goose bumps and noticing those goose bumps put tears in my eyes. I wanted to tell George Lucas that this is cinephilia, enjoying both the perfect and the imperfect, like one of Shakespeare’s muses (I can never remember which sonnet that is…). Don’t worry about changing it. I respect that, as an artist, you want to strive for a certain vision, for the impossibility of perfection. Yet, it’s easier to love something that feels real and natural, beauty that may even have a wrinkle or two.

Drew Morton is a Ph.D. student in Cinema and Media Studies at the University of California-Los Angeles. His criticism and articles have previously appeared in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the UWM Post, Flow, Mediascape, The Playlist, and Senses of Cinema. He is the 2008 and 2010 recipient of the Otis Ferguson Award for Critical Writing in Film Studies.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



HESHER Trailer: If This Site Were to Genetically Engineer an All-Star Celebrity Cast, It Might Look Like This | The 10 Most Horrific Incidents of Off-Screen Movie Theater Violence









Comments

Imagine how much funding NASA would get if we had made the ISS look like the Millenium Falcon instead. IMAGINE IT.

Posted by: LEROOOY at February 21, 2011 2:16 PM

^^Or Robocop. It's already been proven that you can get a grassroots effort going behind a Robocop-themed government project.

Posted by: L4NkYb at February 21, 2011 2:28 PM

My 7-yo son is in love with the Star Wars movies - yes all six of them. But it is 4 - 6 that we consistently watch the most. I can't even begin to guess how many times over the past 3 years I have seen A New Hope. And I still love it. It is the perfect movie.

Posted by: elsie at February 21, 2011 2:33 PM

Call me a heretic but I think that The Clone Wars cartoon is telling a much better story than the prequels. I wouldn't mind one bit if they scrapped the three films from the canon.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 21, 2011 2:34 PM

Hidden Fortress did it!

Posted by: superasente at February 21, 2011 2:41 PM

Bored at work Slim?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at February 21, 2011 2:42 PM

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at February 21, 2011 2:42 PM

:)

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 21, 2011 2:46 PM

You started crying because you noticed goosebumps on your body during a screening of Star Wars? You must be a real mess at funerals.

Posted by: the new transported man at February 21, 2011 2:47 PM

The line is "Either I'm going to kill her or I'm beginning to like her."

Posted by: Todd at February 21, 2011 2:54 PM

neurotically self conscious is either a gross understatement or a misunderstanding of intent when you think of how unwilling Lucas is to have the original versions of the first trilogy on the market

Posted by: idleprimate at February 21, 2011 3:24 PM

Wait, are you saying George Lucas is a good director?

Posted by: Brenton at February 21, 2011 3:31 PM

Todd,

Thanks for the fix. I misquoted, just like everyone seems to think it's "Luke, I am your father." In any case, FIXED!

Posted by: Drew Morton at February 21, 2011 3:46 PM

Thanks for this. I think there's something in my eye.

Posted by: pickled tink at February 21, 2011 4:00 PM

I'm forty-two years old. It's Star Wars, period, and George Lucas can kiss my fat black ass twice. On the pink.

Posted by: Jerry at February 21, 2011 4:46 PM

I should say Star Wars as distinct from Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope. He wants to do prequels, fine, but doing a re-brand just because he wants to go back in time with younger actors is just stupid.

Posted by: Jerry at February 21, 2011 4:49 PM

Terrific assessment, Drew. I particularly agree with your notes about the first three films looking "lived" in vs. the prequels. I - III were far too antiseptic and fake looking to me. From shiny, sleek spacecraft to CGI characters like Jar-Jar, I always felt we left behind authenticity in favor of slick, polished and heavy-handed film-making.

The worst thing about Episodes I - III, in my book, was the dialogue though, particularly between Anakin and Padme. My husband literally fast forwards through any scenes between the two of them it is so painful to watch. Perhaps if he's spent more time on the scripts instead of all the CGI glitz the end result would have been better. Then again, maybe not.

Posted by: prairiegirl at February 21, 2011 4:54 PM

I thought this thread would be a gasoline- drencehd tire fire by now. I guess we all love all or part of Star Wars and there was nothing to throw down over.

Great review though!

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at February 21, 2011 6:30 PM

Star Wars Schamr wars!

Battle Beyond the Stars is a FAR superior film....


(will that do, Mrs Julien?)

Posted by: frank_247 at February 22, 2011 3:35 AM

Just here to say "Han shot first!" and he still does shoot first if you buy each movie individually instead of getting the boxset. Each disk has both the original release and the shitty CGI ones. I replaced the shit versions and kept the kickass Vader box, now I can look at my box of Star Wars dvds with pride. :)

Here ya go:
http://www.amazon.com/Star-Wars-Episode-IV-Widescreen/dp/B000FQJAIW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1298364178&sr=8-1

Also what are these prequels you speak of? There are only three Star Wars movies silly.

Posted by: Mebe at February 22, 2011 3:50 AM

Drew, I know what you mean.

I saw Star Wars when I was six. In the theatre with my dad and sister.

Years and years later, my parents on holiday, so I rented a lot of video's (yes, I'm that old) and got very drunk. And somewhere in the night, putting on a new video and watching the trailers before the film, there it came:

The trailer for Star Wars.

I still don't know why, but I just burst into tears, surprising myself. Maybe for that brief moment I was that little boy again.

Great review, Drew.

Posted by: Magiel at February 22, 2011 4:55 AM

It's "angrily" not "angerly". Otherwise, nice piece.

Posted by: DFT at February 22, 2011 10:33 AM

Your last sentiment puts me in mind of a quote from Nelson Algren about Chicago:
Like loving a woman with a broken nose, you may well find lovelier lovelies. But never a lovely so real.

I can still remember swinging my heels in the theater, because my legs were so short, and a six-year-old has no patience. And then just freezing for the next 2 hours when the sunset scene happened.

Posted by: W. E. Coyote at February 22, 2011 2:14 PM

DFT,

I'd fix it, but then I'd be a hypocrite. ;)

Posted by: Drew Morton at February 23, 2011 8:44 AM

@Slim, you are right. Though I find the third season somewhat lacking.

Posted by: FabMax at February 23, 2011 8:58 AM

Nice report, thanks for sharing it!

I must say though, you complained about the pristine look of the prequels, especially when compared to the originals, but i believe that was intentional. The prequels took place in a completely different time, when the Republic thrived and there was still a certain degree of freedom and beauty.

By the time we get to the OT, there's limits, it's darker times when i would think the Emperor took away a lot of the freedom and beauty that existed before.

That's why i think the contrast between the two trilogies work. I don't think it would have looked right to see a run down Republic; we had to see it in its prime in the prequels so we could get a sense of how much things did change when the Empire took over.

Posted by: Dee at February 24, 2011 2:39 PM