web
counter
 

Bela Lugosi’s (Not) Dead

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (26)



despicableme2sm.jpg

Forgive me for appearing jubilant, but it thrills me when the wasteland known as children’s entertainment occasionally reveals a treasure. After all, I watch most of the kiddie flicks around here, and most of them offer nothing more than a temporary diversion for those young minds. But the playing field of kiddie flick animated films has finally changed, folks, for it is no longer just a “Pixar takes all” game. Although it’s true that audiences indeed flocked to Toy Story 3 out of nostalgia, it was also a film of “too many missed opportunities.” More specifically in the context of this review, Pixar has turned their attention for many months to an older franchise; in doing so, they’ve stopped moving forth while pausing to leisurely reflect upon the past. This fateful choice has opened a valuable window for opportunistic rival studios to claim some quality control of their own — hence the rise of the recently comparative How to Train Your Dragon (DreamWorks), Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs (Sony Pictures), and now Despicable Me (Universal/Illumination) — and has temporarily made this movie critic happy as hell.

As it turns out, Despicable Me is a charming movie that miraculously succeeds (as a whole but when selectively ignoring the pyramid bit) yet owes absolutely nothing to its inept marketing team, who issued a series of trailers that, essentially, vaguely informed the audience of the possibility of a heist film or some 007/Mission Impossible knockoff. To be perfectly blunt, I wasn’t looking forward to this movie at all, but as soon as Despicable Me’s introductory pyramid scene ended, things shifted into a sharp-witted and original story (conceived by Sergio Pablos) about a gleefully anarchic villain, who succeeds in fulfilling his life’s dreams but realizes that the fruits of evil carry a bitter aftertaste and that adding some sugar produces much greater rewards. In a way, Despicable Me examines the inner life of a villain (which is somewhat comparable to a reversal of The Incredibles) while unapologetically borrowing from pre-existing tales. Any and all likenesses may not be purely coincidental, but the filmmakers don’t exhibit a lack of imagination so much as spare the audience some unnecessary groundwork in favor of swiftly moving forth within a character-driven tale. And make no mistake, the main character is quite a remarkable one.

Despicable Me introduces Gru (Steve Carell, phenomenal here), who fancies himself an incorrigible misanthrope and suffers from a grotesque hunchbacked appearance. Now, to label Gru an ogre would work unfair and much too simplistic comparisons to a certain DreamWorks character. Instead, Gru’s much more like the badly-drawn (by Charles Addams, natch) lovechild of Bela Legosi (with clear influences from The Raven and The Invisible Ray), Ricardo Montalban (forget “Fantasy Island” and think Wrath of Khan), Boris Badenov (minus Natasha Fatale), as well as healthy doses of Wile E. Coyote (super genius!) mixed in for good measure.

Of course, this is a kiddie flick, so Gru’s not really a traditional villain (and much too underachieving to be a supervillain) but more of an antihero. His misdeeds — freezing everyone in line ahead of him at the coffee shop or driving a rocket-fueled vehicle that knocks everything out of his way (and thus avoiding parallel parking and traffic jams) — don’t really physically harm anyone. He also steals semiprecious things — replicas of the Statue of Liberty and Eiffel Tower, along with the Times Square NBC jumbotron — that won’t necessarily be missed. Still, most of the time, Gru’s not a terribly likable fellow. During his day-to-day existence, he does mean-spirited things — such as encounter a sobbing child, blow up an animal balloon, and pop it — just for the hell of it. Quite ridiculously, Gru also insists upon living (or rather, sticking out) in idyllic suburbia, where his black house and dried-up lawn conceal many dastardly items, including a panda-skin rug and an iron maiden. These horrible items are just part of the show, however, for the impetus for Gru’s life of villainy lies, naturally, in his childhood, where a father figure is conspicuously absent. Sadly, Gru has made a lifelong effort to make his mother (Julie Andrews, as the opposite of Mary Poppins) proud, and every one of his absurd antics works towards that purpose. The main problem here is that Gru’s particular brand of villainy doesn’t turn a profit, and the Bank of Evil (headed by Mr. Perkins (Will Arnett, once again not failing to disappoint) pulls the plug on financing.

Gru soon discovers that the Bank would rather invest in the scemes of a younger, hungrier villain, which is where Vector’s (the vocally bland Jason Segel) theft of an Egyptian pyramid comes into play. So, Gru hatches a diabolical (for once, suitably so) plan to prove his evil worth. To execute this plan, Gru enlists three adorable orphans — Margo (Miranda Cosgrove), Edith (Dana Gaier), and Agnes (Elsie Fisher) — whom he adopts, only to find his life dictated by ballet rehearsals and whatnot. Yes, these girls are impossibly adorable, but the eldest one tempers the younger two with a world-weary dose of reality. And of course, there are Annie references, but these orphans are far less annoying and (even better) don’t sing. Obviously, Gru is not the ideal father; he puts the girls to sleep in detonated bombs while assuring, “Good night. Sleep tight. Don’t let the bed bugs bite. There are literally thousands of them. And there’s probably something in your closet.” However, Carell — voicing the character with an eccentric Eastern European (or, more specifically, vaguely Romanian with a clear Russian influence) accent of sorts — works some serious magic and handles the role in such an offbeat way that the character is damn near irresistible.

One barely even notices that a very brisk 95 minutes quickly passes by as Gru is aided by his assistant, Dr. Nefario (a surprisingly restrained Russell Brand, possibly channeling Dr. Strangelove) and an army of Twinkie-like minions who provide “Three Stooges”-esque comic relief. Visually speaking, Despicable Me also does a fine job by combining old-school touches with the obligatory technology that contempary audiences would demand. A visit to an amusement park includes a rollercoaster ride that, in 2D, jolts the stomach just fine, so one can easily skip the 3D premium charge. Just don’t miss the movie itself.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Girl Who Played With Fire Review | The Sh*t-Kicking Misandrist Damsel in Distress | Do You Have a Tipping Point? | When the Personal and Professional Lives of Celebrities Collide









Comments

Up until the enlisting of the orphans, this sounds a lot like Mr. Horrible, yes? Not that that's a bad thing.

Posted by: Chrissimas at July 12, 2010 2:36 PM

Hurrah! I'm always so happy when an animated movie turns out well.

I remember way back when the first spots for the movie showed up. It was just the two minions trying to say the word "Despicable" and it just cracked me up so hard that I really wanted it to be part of a good movie.

So, excellent! I'll put this one on my "To Watch" list. It'll get to the $2 theater eventually...

Posted by: figgy at July 12, 2010 2:38 PM

I am well-pleased by this review. I don't watch many movies of this sort but actually look forward to seeing this one.

Posted by: Spender at July 12, 2010 2:40 PM

With my freeze-ray I will stop . . .

Posted by: BWeaves at July 12, 2010 2:43 PM

Glad to see this turned out better than expected, may actually spend the money to see it now.

And BTW, that is Dr. Horrible - he has a PhD in horribleness!

Posted by: JMD at July 12, 2010 2:49 PM

It's soooo FURRAHHHH!!!

I'm just too easy to please. But there's nothing better than holding a little dog up and saying that.

Posted by: Mrcreosote at July 12, 2010 3:05 PM

Maybe I'm hungover and incorrect, but it seems to me that "not failing to disappoint" means that he disappointed you, which I think is the opposite of what you intended.

Posted by: kate the great at July 12, 2010 3:15 PM

Hee, Mrcreosote, that's my favorite part of the trailer. "It's so fluffy I could DIE!"

Yeah, definitely going to see this one. Glad to hear it lives up to the trailers I've seen.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at July 12, 2010 3:18 PM

Yae! SO glad this was great! Love Carell, and when I saw the trailer for this last March, it got my attention.

Might have to borrow my niece just for the fun of seeing this.

Posted by: Juicein LA at July 12, 2010 3:24 PM

Yay! I was waffling over watching this movie on the big screen or waiting for the DVD; guess I'll be heading down to our local, itty-bitty theatre for some weekend fun (and thanks for the Bauhaus reference-spot on!).

Posted by: kootenay girl at July 12, 2010 3:25 PM

I saw this on Saturday and had the most fun I've had in a long time. At the end of the film, the 8 yr old kid in the row in front of us proclaimed loudly, "that was the best movie EVAR!"

Its nice when kids and grownups both have a genuine good time and not just because they threw in some 70s/80s pop culture references.

Posted by: stinky at July 12, 2010 3:27 PM

I forgot about the Dr. Horrible comparisons, but they're appropriate.

Gru is not so much evil as he's a villain; someone who makes his living by doing dastardly and nefarious deeds. (List any number of other professions). Weirdly, there doesn't seem to be any heroes in this world -- perhaps we'll see them in the sequel.

I liked the characters. They made the movie stand out. And I'll disagree slightly on the assessment of Segel's Vector. He goes for a major dork vibe that I think comes off as it should.

Posted by: Fredo at July 12, 2010 3:37 PM

I dunno...I just saw this and I was like, "meh..." Carrell and Brand did a great job with Gru and Dr. Nefarious though. It did remind me of Dr Horrible without Captain Hammer...needs more Fillon.

Posted by: pyroplastique at July 12, 2010 3:46 PM

Well thank God. Finally a decent movie I can take my youngest to. The last good one was How to Train Your Dragon. So many pieces of crap since then.

Posted by: EricD at July 12, 2010 3:55 PM

Just about anyone who sees this will identify with one of the sisters more than the others. For me, oddly, it was angry, distrusting middle child Edith.

While this is a movie for everyone, it's especially a movie for fathers and daughters.

(And am I the only one who caught that hilarious Lehman Brothers joke?)

Personally, I give this three out of four stars. And it begs a sequel.

Posted by: Omnibus Driver at July 12, 2010 4:26 PM

Huh - I expected this to suck golf balls and shoot them out it's ass. Instead it sounds as though it's on the same level with How To Train a Dragon which my wife adores. I've never known her to rewatch anything, but she keeps pestering me to take the family back again.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at July 12, 2010 4:27 PM

Saw this with three of my little cousins Friday night and was delighted that it both entertained me and kept their attention to the point where not one of them uttered a peep the entire movie. However, one of them had several instances where she thought something was funny and would look at me to see if I was laughing too (usually I was.) It warms the heart almost enough to make me forget that I hate children.
And I am completely with you on the roller-coaster thing; I spent the sunny part of that great day with the kiddos at an amusement park (fun day...) and had some deja vu from the rides. Ugh, did not enjoy that scene so much.

Posted by: Erin S at July 12, 2010 6:49 PM

Meh, I was not impressed. Not nearly as entertaining as How To Train Your Dragon. Brand was absolutely wasted here. WASTED! I smiled a few times and maybe laughed twice, but otherwise, it was just OK. I did get the Lehman Bros joke, BTW. I give it 2 stars out of 4- Toy Story 3 was so much better than this, I thought. Sooooooo glad I didn't opt for 3-D too, as it was pretty obvious they tacked some 3-D bullshit onto the end (I mean the really end! it was after the credits for God's sake!).

Posted by: EJ at July 12, 2010 7:44 PM

the producers obviously read the evil overlords list.

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at July 12, 2010 8:36 PM

The Lehman Bros. joke got the deepest laugh of the movie.

Posted by: JaB at July 12, 2010 10:22 PM

you have to see Despicable Me that is so good. But Mambo from Happy feet is adorable! Your green Friend

Posted by: BestBlogHere at July 13, 2010 1:45 AM

I don't really want to be 'that girl' but to me, this was probably the worst animated movie I've ever seen.

Posted by: Brittany at July 13, 2010 3:10 AM

This was cute, but...

Toy Story 3 and even How To Train Your Dragon was miles (streets!) ahead of this.

Posted by: HoJu at July 14, 2010 9:04 PM

I must have seen a completely different movie. I checked my watch numerous times and laughed - at best - a couple of times. It was a completely pedestrian affair, even for my 10-year old.

Posted by: evm at July 15, 2010 11:33 AM

What a great night listening to belly laughs from children and adults. This movie is just plain fun and so fluffy............

Posted by: Suzeet at July 17, 2010 11:48 PM

I thought it was going to be some boring old post, but it really compensated for my time. I will post a link to this page on my blog. I am sure my visitors will find that very useful.I think you have done an excellent job with your blog. I will return in the near future.I had bookmark it :)

Posted by: Cheap fashion dresses at January 5, 2011 9:46 PM