web
counter
 

The Romance Is Over

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (20)



shrekforever2sm.jpg

Fourth movies in a franchise are generally put forth with the intent to reinvent and revitalize but, sadly, usually only betray the filmmakers’ inability to not take advantage of one last box-office grab. In doing so, studios often kill the very spirit that brought audiences to their knees in the first place. To wit, Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull abandoned suspense and logic for CGI; Live Free or Die Hard went PG-13 on our asses; A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master turned Freddy into the veritable game-show host of horror villains; Terminator Salvation made damn certain that we were all finished, professionally; and, presumably, Breaking Dawn’s cesarean-by-vampire-teeth will blow the glitter from the rest of the Twilight franchise. As to the case at hand, Shrek Forever After abandons its rollicking and adventuresome spirit in favor of going the existential route.

Rest assured, however, that those notorious burps and farts are still present. Because those are important.

Shrek Forever After, by its very nature, illustrates its own lack of necessity. Since the franchise had already exhausted the thin premise upon which the previous three movies managed to subsist, this sequel didn’t have many possible directions in which to turn. So, the filmmakers returned to the very beginning to revise the (fairy tale) revisionism, so to speak. When the fourth film commences, Shrek (Mike Myers) is feeling the inertia of this drawn-out franchise daily life, which he finds to be awfully boring compared to the excitement of doing what an ogre does best; that is, generally scaring the crap out of people. Also, he’s feeling the weight of inertia after the first three movies worth of wooing his true love, breaking curses, and dealing with various obstacles on the way to his own “happily ever after.” Quite simply, Shrek has quickly grown disenchanted with his relatively peaceful family life with Princess Fiona (Cameron Diaz), which mostly revolves around caring for their infant triplets. Since it wouldn’t be much of a movie to watch an emasculated Shrek spend most of his time changing diapers — instead of being his former fearsome self and throwing his own poop at the audience — the movie turns to the only possible plot device by figuratively deleting Shrek, placing him in an alternate reality, and making him fight his way back into dreadfully boring domesticated life. Ooh, good plan.

So, the story introduces Rumpelstiltskin (Walt Dohrn), who offers Shrek a one-day pass, during which he shall be free from domesticity. In exchange, Stiltz only asks for a mere day of the ogre’s childhood. Naturally, Shrek jumps at the chance, but Stiltz antes up by claming the day Shrek was born, effectively erasing the titular ogre from existence and leaving him with a mere 24 hours to put things back where they should be, or he shall be erased completely. Now, Shrek is recognized by none of his former comrades, including his best friend, Donkey (Eddie Murphy) and Puss in Boots (Antonio Banderas), who has transformed into a fattie. Stiltz now runs the kingdom of Far Far Away (this is rationalized through a flashback, which presumes that Stilz lost a power struggle towards the beginning of the franchise and has yearned for revenge against Shrek all along) and has placed ogres into slavery. As such Fiona has become the leader of the freedom-fighting resistance (which is the closest Diaz will ever get to playing that sort of role). When Stiltz describes Shrek’s dilemma as a “metaphysical paradox,” the semi-enchanted spellbound audience of the first three Shrek films finally breaks free from the ridiculous hold that this franchise formerly held over the box office.

To further emphasize the cash-grab aspect of this sequel, DreamWorks Animation has made a huge deal of making the transformation to 3-D. This is a self-defeating move, and the visual results pale in comparison to the studio’s recent How to Train Your Dragon. Not to mention the fact that Dragon dealt with more mature themes while still maintaining an adventuresome spirit. Still, it’s not for lack of halfheartedly trying because, technically speaking, Shrek Forever After does attempt to deal with more “adult” themes. Still, imagine how It’s a Wonderful Life would have been if directed by the guy who gave us Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo (Mike Mitchell), and you’ve essentially figured out how this sequel fares. After tossing in countless expected pop culture riffs to The Wizard of Oz , Groundhog Day, and Deliverance (just to name a few), yet still managing to lose all the whimsical enjoyment of the other Shrek movies, and we’ve got one dead franchise. Skip this movie at all costs.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Science of Sex | 'Nothing's Wrong, I'm Fine' Now Officially the Most Obvious Lie in Human History | Exclusive: Hasbro Developing Its Own Version of "The Avengers" | Night at the Museum Meets Toy Story









Comments

I didn't even realize this was released this weekend. I was too wrapped up in television. Of course, I never saw the second or third ones. It still cleared $70 million.

Thanks for the review. I think that will be about the extent of my exposure to it.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at May 24, 2010 3:44 PM

I am surprised they passed up the opportunity to call it "Shrek Fourever After.
Or the more compact "4Ever".
Does this imply some kind of restraint on their part?

Posted by: Odnon at May 24, 2010 3:57 PM

Hey, it seems to be largely keeping Mike Myers out of live-action. Given his last few efforts, that does seem worthwhile.

Posted by: Eep at May 24, 2010 4:05 PM

I promise not to see this movie. But I am curious to learn how they squeezed a Deliverance reverence into a 3D kiddie animation. I'm guessing/hoping Shrek was making Donkey squeel like a pig.

Posted by: EricD at May 24, 2010 4:19 PM

Ok, so I knew they were trying to make it some lame ass version of It's a Wonderful Life, but please tell me, how dot hey explain that Fiona is an ogre? Because in the first movie, she's only an ogre at night, until her true love comes and kisses her. And in the first movie, the king of Farquard(?) decides to make her his bride and marry her. So, wouldn't she be a princess? Or, at the very least a self-loathing ogre? Because she seemed to hate it until Shrek came along.

Also, if you could please tell me why I care, I'd greatly appreciate it.

Posted by: Kayanne at May 24, 2010 4:20 PM

I wouldn't mind if the Shrek franchise continues.

But that's only because it keeps the fugly beings of Mike Myers, Cameron Diaz, and Eddie Murphy from appearing in half-assed comedies/fat suits/human form.

Posted by: Shamong at May 24, 2010 5:02 PM

I saw it, and it really wasn't as bad as I feared. It is, at any rate, several times better than the 3rd one, which I refuse to acknowledge as real effort. If the franchise had skipped the 3rd movie and ended it here, we'd all be much happier.

Posted by: Torint at May 24, 2010 5:04 PM

Oh, my God! I care so little I almost passed out!

Posted by: figgy at May 24, 2010 5:49 PM

Shrek meets its a wonderful life?

Posted by: homeslice at May 24, 2010 5:53 PM

The Bond Franchise and the Star Trek Franchise are the only two series that have had a decent fourth film that I can think of off the top of my head.

Posted by: Adam C at May 24, 2010 7:24 PM

Still, it’s not for lack of halfheartedly trying

That is my new motto at pointless work. Lazily, I thank you for it.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at May 24, 2010 10:06 PM

Couldn't agree LESS.
Went to see this last night and I enjoyed it...Why shouldn't they continue using the same characters--I personally LOVE them and find them incredibly well developed and visually interesting.

I really, really liked it and I'd definitely recommend it.
It's kind of like an alternative story...Well it IS an alternative story...
Sort of reminds me of those old "Choose Your Own Adventure" novels!!

Posted by: Steph2185 at May 25, 2010 1:12 PM

I was mildly interested in seeing this because I heard somewhere that Lord Farquaad (John Lithgow) was in it, but nevermind. That "mildly interested" just turned into "I really don't give a damn."

And that's a good question, Kayanne. I can't answer it, but it's definitely a good question.

Posted by: Brie at May 25, 2010 3:50 PM

I kept feeling like I am watching a straight to video Disney sequel (The Little Mermaid 15), with stupid unoriginal plot (how many movies in Hollywood history already copied the plot of “It’s a Wonderful Life”?), and the studio trying to aim to a much lower age demographics then the first and second movie.

Granted all the little kids in the theater really enjoyed it, so what do I know.

Posted by: yifat shaik at May 25, 2010 4:41 PM

Go see The Trotsky instead, I had a pretty good time at it.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at May 25, 2010 7:00 PM

We took our 8 year old to see it and we enjoyed it. I basically see every crappy kid's movie that comes out and this was much better than a lot of what the studios churn out. The animation was beautiful and I thought it was enhanced by the 3D effect.

Kayanne - without giving too much away - yes, her spell had not been broken so she was only an ogre at night. It factors into the plot in a way that makes sense.

Posted by: Alison at May 26, 2010 9:48 AM

I loved it. I thought it was a great movie, and seeing Fiona in action again was a definite plus. I work at the IMAX in Maryland (the real one) and I can say that this is one of the better films we've shown. I'm dreading the thought of it leaving (mainly because after it goes, we're getting those sorry, fake, glittering, vegetarian vampires to watch for the space of a month).
These movies aren't for the older generation anymore. Wonderful Life was good, but it's nice to see a new demographic being able to appreciate the same lessons in a way they'd actually enjoy it (Like Snow White to Tiana). Shrek Forever After does that. There are only seven stories ever told, remember? It's not surprizing to see a recycled theme.

Posted by: Danielle at May 26, 2010 11:12 AM

That's too bad. I thought the first two were brilliant.

Posted by: Noelegy at May 28, 2010 4:03 PM

I have such a soft spot for Puss in Boots, I'd probably see it no matter what.

Posted by: Gabs at June 1, 2010 1:02 AM

I love Shrek to bits, It's got so much magic in it, and just a outstanding film and so amusing.

Posted by: Theo Toromanides at June 25, 2010 5:57 PM