couples_retreat.jpg
Full Disclosure: Couples Retreat Blows Pineapple Chunks


Couples Retreat / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | October 9, 2009 | Comments (67)


It’s a funny little coincidence that the FTC would introduce new regulations this week to ensure that bloggers make full disclosures when they are offered payment in exchange for reviews or coverage. Some of you may already know this, but Universal Pictures — the studio behind Couples Retreat — spared no expense (despite the fact that they are strapped for cash) and flew quite a few members of the press out to Bora Bora and paid for their accommodations, hoping — I suspect — to gain some more positive coverage. My guess is that the puff pieces were just a little more puffier this week, although I’d like to believe that no critics’ opinions were swayed by the four-star treatment on a fucking resort island.

Of course, we weren’t invited to the Bora Bora junket (full disclosure: I’m not at all bitter). But why would I want to spend a few days, on a studio’s dime, on a tropical isalnd with fruity beverages, water you can see through, and magnificent scenery. I live in Maine, after all. It’s a beautiful state (full disclosure: It’s no Bora Bora). I live both near the countryside and five minutes from the ocean (full disclosure: Summer only lasts six weeks in Maine). Besides, I wouldn’t want my journalistic integrity called into question in exchange for a free resort vacation spent with Jason Bateman, Vince Vaughn, Kristen Bell (in a bikini) and the director of Iron Man (full disclosure: I could’ve spared a little integrity in exchange for a cabana interview with Vaughn and Bell over piña coladas.)

Of course, none of it would’ve had any effect on my review of Couples Retreat (full disclosure: I’d have been too drunk to compose it). It’s a heinous family comedy with about as many laughs as Vince Vaughn has chins these days (full disclosure: That was a cheap joke). It’s a shame, too, because Couples Retreat represents a massive waste of talent: In addition to Vaughn, Bell, Bateman, and Favreau, the movie also features Malin Ackerman, Faison Love, and Kristen Davis (full disclosure: Those last three have no talent to waste, and Kristen’s Bell’s talent mostly resides in her bikini area). I expected a mediocre comedy, at best, but nevertheless came away massively disappointed (full disclosure: I may have slept briefly).

More frustrating is the fact that, though Favreau has made several, mostly brief, appearances in Vaughn’s films over the years (the bad ones), this was the first full-on collaboration between the two since Doug Liman’s seminal ’90s comedy, Swingers (written by Favreau, although Vaughn often jokingly likes to claim that Favreau merely “wrote” down what Vaughn was saying). I suppose Couples Retreat was meant to be a sort of Swingers for couples settled into their marriages. But there’s no attitude in Couples Retreat — it’s just a mesmerizingly dull 107 minutes. It’s Heartbreak Kid without the gross-out gags. And I can’t for the life of me figure out why two people as talented as Favreau and Vaughn decided to make it (full disclosure: It was for the fucking money).

The setup: Jason Bateman and Kristen Bell play an overly systematic married couple — who have resorted to charting their relationship in Power Point presentations — who decide, after failing to conceive, to consider a divorce. However, before they make that step toward finality, they convince their three couples-friends to join them on an island Eden for married couples with problems. Vince Vaughn’s Dave and Ackerman’s Ronnie, — a solid, dependable middle-class Tim-Allen couple with run-of-the-mill gendered problems (he wants to watch football; she wants to pick out new tiles) — decide to join them, along with Jon Favreau’s Joey and his wife, Cynthia (Kristen Davis), who hate each other and are waiting only for their daughter to graduate high school before they decide to go off and fuck other people. Then there’s Shane (Faison Love), a thirty-something divorcée who decides to bring his 20-year-old girlfriend of two weeks along for reasons that aren’t entirely clear (full disclosure: They needed a token black couple).Naturally, through a few therapy sessions, massages, some Yoga, a “couples whisperer” (Jean Reno), and various other ridiculous contrivances, the couples drift even further apart before another, bigger contrivance (involving Guitar Hero) comes along and provides the impetus for the predictable happy ending (full disclosure: I was happy only because it was over),

Couples Retreat, which comes from first-time director Peter Billingsley (Ralphie in A Christmas Story) is tired, lazy, spectacularly unfunny, and full of product shout-outs that appeal to its heartland audience (Applebees, Bud Light). The acting is hammy; the situations are forced; the wit is nil; and the comedy is only hinted at. The only real question that Couples Retreat raises is why these attractive women, all of whom look spectacular in bikinis, would decide to be with four schlubby, pale, beer-bellied men. Unfortunately, that is a question I simply can’t answer (full disclosure: It’s because the pale, beer-bellied men wrote, directed, and produced the movie).


The Ten Best Newscast Gaffes | "If You Can't Say Something Nice About Someone ...





Comments

You lost both me and about a million of my close friends at "...Kristen Bell (in a bikini)..."

Sorry.

Posted by: Skitz at October 9, 2009 3:23 PM

The only real question that Couples Retreat raises is why these attractive women, all of whom look spectacular in bikinis, would decide to be with four schlubby, pale, beer-bellied men. Unfortunately, that is a question I simply can’t answer (full disclosure: It’s because the pale, beer-bellied men wrote, directed, and produced the movie).

Yup.

Posted by: Rusty (formerly Genny) at October 9, 2009 3:29 PM

I dunno. Women seem perfectly willing to put up with men who are less than classically attractive. When was the last time you saw some Adonis walking down the street with a short, schlubby woman with a bald spot and a little pot belly?

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at October 9, 2009 3:34 PM

Yup, looked tubbylicious from the previews. Oh, and HATE Malin Ackerman (seriously...IS there a purpose for this woman's existence? Discuss)

I will be spending my weekend viewing $$ at the ONE theatre in Indy showing "Paranormal Activity" 13 times a day (no, I am NOT kidding). Who's gonna make a killing? Come on...come on....say it.....who's gonna make a fortune? YOU are, Showplace 16!

Posted by: dammitjanet at October 9, 2009 3:35 PM

Faizon Love is pale? I'll be right back; I need to get out and get some sun.

Posted by: laredo at October 9, 2009 3:38 PM

@laredo

So then, you'll be right black?

Zank you, zank you, Detroit, ich in be here all ze veek.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at October 9, 2009 3:41 PM

Funny and clever review. Thanks!

Posted by: DarthCorleone at October 9, 2009 3:42 PM

Was it just me or was that an awful lot of (full disclosures)?

Posted by: bob at October 9, 2009 3:46 PM

Full Disclosure: Couples Retreat Blows Pineapple Chunks

Was there really ever any question?

Posted by: Cindy at October 9, 2009 3:49 PM

The only real question that Couples Retreat raises is why these attractive women, all of whom look spectacular in bikinis, would decide to be with four schlubby, pale, beer-bellied men. Unfortunately, that is a question I simply can’t answer (full disclosure: It’s because the pale, beer-bellied men wrote, directed, and produced the movie).

Really? Hmmmm. Interesting take.

(read: Stupid fucking writer's block. FUCK!!!!)

Posted by: Vermillion at October 9, 2009 3:50 PM

What is Made if not a full-on collaboration between Favreau and Vaughn?

Posted by: Kikko at October 9, 2009 3:58 PM

"...this was the first full-on collaboration between the two since Doug Liman’s seminal ’90s comedy, Swingers..."

What about Made? It had P-Diddy!

Not that it matters. This movie still sucks.

Posted by: Sean at October 9, 2009 4:01 PM

After this and Four Christmases, I think we need a new term for this kind of cast waste:

Bombsemble.

Posted by: laredo at October 9, 2009 4:05 PM

[sigh]

Kikko and Sean, your eyes are not deceiving you. I thought I caught it in time.

(Full disclosure: DarthCorleone beat you both to the punch but I deleted his comment because I thought I had snipped it at the root.)

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at October 9, 2009 4:08 PM

It's cool, Ted...I just have an awful compulsion to point these things out. It can be a problem at times.

Also, I thought maybe it was being overlooked because Vaughn was such an incredible, unrepentant asshole in that movie.

Posted by: Sean at October 9, 2009 4:16 PM

I've never liked Vince Vaughn. Seriously, where is the attraction? Dude looks like a washed-out ex-Acacia hack still clinging to the bottle of whiskey that was the only friend to accompany him from college to the miseries of middle age. I can't imagine a woman anywhere who would ever go home with him.

Seriously, folks. I've never seen Swingers, so how good was that script that it actually gave this guy a career? Tell me, I'm confused.

Posted by: Cat at October 9, 2009 4:17 PM

I feel like Vince Vaughn is this generation's Carey Grant. Think about it. They both talk real fast and get themselves into crazy hijinks involving women. Eh? Eh?

Aaaah, what do you know?

Posted by: Johnnyvonawesome at October 9, 2009 4:22 PM

I can't imagine a woman anywhere who would ever go home with him.

Well, he has a very specific appeal. Wedding Crashers and Old School wouldn't have been the same without him, and that same character was pretty good in Mr. and Mrs. Smith. He has a particular thing that he can do that is suited for those films. Outside that arena (The Breakup, Domestic Disturbance), he struggles. Although he was pretty excellent in Clay Pigeons.

Fun fact: Both Vaughn and Owen Wilson have played serial killers, Vaughn twice.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at October 9, 2009 4:24 PM

ViVa in Swingers was the hairy-knuckled pixie manic girl that drags the morosely lethargic protaganist out into the light...or perhaps Ferris Bueller as a lounge singer.That film was the zenith of the Favraughn collaborative; the nadir refreshes each year.

Posted by: laredo at October 9, 2009 4:25 PM

Full Disclosure: I loved the review, I am very disappointed with team Vaughreau, and I'm not wearing any pants right now. (Did I say "full disclosure"? I meant "two truths and a lie".)

Posted by: fucta14 at October 9, 2009 4:39 PM

Kristen’s Bell’s talent mostly resides in her bikini area

I'm not gonna lie to you all, I've been dreaming of residing in her bikini area for quite some time now.

Posted by: Xtreme at October 9, 2009 4:42 PM

...why these attractive women, all of whom look spectacular in bikinis, would decide to be with four schlubby, pale, beer-bellied men. Unfortunately, that is a question I simply can’t answer.


I like the schlubby, pale, beer bellied men. In fact the schlubby part is kind of a weakness for me. It's not even a thing about a need to improve a guy either. I dig the schlubs, what can I say?

Schlubby is a weird word, no?

Posted by: ashes at October 9, 2009 4:45 PM

This Full Disclosure:_____ ______ _____ snowclone sounds like it belongs on a range of cheap porn flicks...

Posted by: jim of the lower case at October 9, 2009 5:02 PM

I hope you mean that Kristen Bell's talents lie in her bikini in this movie, because she was awesome in "Veronica Mars" and was about the only thing watchable in later seasons of "Heroes".

Posted by: Craig at October 9, 2009 5:05 PM

Bateman's hot. It's true.

There's something about Vince Vaughn too. He's aging pretty poorly though.

Posted by: becks at October 9, 2009 5:06 PM

Malin Akerman is hot

Posted by: Ari at October 9, 2009 5:16 PM

Vince Vaughn has some serious weight issues, while he'll never get his Swingers looks back, the man has the ability to look good at times. Maybe he should talk with his doctor about the weight, that, and fire his agent.

Posted by: George at October 9, 2009 5:45 PM

Um, when I looked at the header pic, I thought "DAMN Steve Guttenberg really let himself go and he's OLD now!"

Then I realized it was Favreau. Dude.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at October 9, 2009 5:46 PM

@ashes

Hey. How you doin'?

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at October 9, 2009 5:47 PM

Kristen’s Bell’s talent mostly resides in her bikini area

WTF? No way. Maybe she sucked in this movie - I'll never see it, so I don't know - but she was amazing in Veronica Mars and managed to make her character in Sarah Marshall sympathetic.

Posted by: the essence of fanciness and class at October 9, 2009 5:52 PM

@Cat: Seriously, folks. I've never seen Swingers, so how good was that script that it actually gave this guy a career? Tell me, I'm confused.

There has never been a movie more true to how single men in their 20's interact with one another than Swingers. It is a perfect snapshot of the mid 90's post-grunge era, but the characters illustrated are timeless. And Vaughn is absolutely brilliant in it. If you haven't seen swingers, you really don't know Vince Vaughn. T-Bone is one of the best, most genuine characters in cinema history. Please do yourself a favor and watch swingers TONIGHT.

Posted by: Yoyo at October 9, 2009 5:58 PM

Vince Vaughan was a beautiful man, once upon a time. Georger is right, he'll never get his Swingers looks back, but losing a couple pounds would do him a world of good. Not that he's not attractive on the pudgy side, he's just more attractive on the not so pudgy side.

Posted by: Eyvi at October 9, 2009 6:06 PM

Oh, and HATE Malin Ackerman (seriously...IS there a purpose for this woman's existence? Discuss)

As far as I can tell, she's the poor man's Anna Faris.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at October 9, 2009 6:07 PM

Kristen’s Bell’s talent mostly resides in her bikini area

Saywhatnow?

full disclosure: anyone mistakenly typing "Kristen Bell" instead of "Kristen Davis", thereby insinuating that Veronica Mars is bereft of talent, had best check under their beds before sleeping, lest they wake up strapped into a chair with their eyelids taped open, with an Uwe Boll extravaganza playing on endless loop. Please send due apologies and corrections to: Kristen Bell, c/o lordhelmet, MurderMaid, Low Earth Orbit, 90909. She may be tiny (and cute when she's mad!) but she's finishing the targeting system training program, and is picking out locations in Maine to warm up on. That is all.

Posted by: lordhelmet at October 9, 2009 6:12 PM

[sigh]

Kikko and Sean, your eyes are not deceiving you. I thought I caught it in time.

(Full disclosure: DarthCorleone beat you both to the punch but I deleted his comment because I thought I had snipped it at the root.)

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at October 9, 2009 4:08 PM


I'm confused, is Dustin also socalled?

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at October 9, 2009 6:50 PM

I'm confused, is Dustin also socalled?

Have you ever seen us in the same place at the same time? I mean, aside from the unfortunate Ryan Reynolds circle jerk incident.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at October 9, 2009 6:56 PM

-- aside from the unfortunate Ryan Reynolds circle jerk incident.

Now I know you two aren't the same person. Dustin wouldn't call that "unfortunate".

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at October 9, 2009 7:49 PM

Full disclosure: I long for the day I can be the meat in a Kristen Bell/Malin Ackerman sandwich. I guess I got a thing for cute, funny blondes.

And what I've found is that Favreau and Vaughn seem to work better away from one another -- Vaughn makes Wedding Crashers and Favreau directs Iron Man. But together it's like they forget to bring their A-game and decide to phone it in and have fun.

That said, how can anyone not look at the trailers and think "Wow, they wasted a really good cast and a great setting on this?" The Hangover proved that a simple concept and a good cast + smart writing can make a great movie.

Posted by: Fredo at October 9, 2009 9:03 PM

and point goes to L.O.V.E.

Posted by: gp at October 9, 2009 9:04 PM

"that bloggers make full disclosures when they are offered payment in exchange for reviews or coverage. ..."

OMG!

I can hide this NO LONGER!

Rowles has been male prostituting himself to Ryan Reynolds FOR YEARS!!!!!!

He even asked me to *sobs* to kill Scarlett Joohhannenssen (whatever)

Sorry buddy, you are on your own...


*Phil, make it dramatic*

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 9, 2009 9:40 PM

Looking for wealthy men for dating or marriage? Maybe you want to check out ====WealthySeeker.Com ====, which features certified millionaire and verified beautiful women.

Posted by: Jessie at October 9, 2009 9:45 PM

Oh, and also he touched me inappropriately, several times.


...but I was always the man.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 10, 2009 12:14 AM

-- Oh, and also he touched me inappropriately, several times.

Reynolds or Rowles?

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at October 10, 2009 12:59 AM

Does it matter?

Does. it. matter...?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 10, 2009 1:04 AM

Absolutely.

With Rowles you can get his ass thrown in jail.
With Pol... with Reynolds you get a pay day. And you can sell your story to the tabloids.

If I'm getting diddled I want it to at least be by a famous dude.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at October 10, 2009 1:32 AM

If I'm getting diddled I want it to at least be by a famous dude.

Words to live by.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at October 10, 2009 2:17 AM

If I'm getting diddled I want it to at least be by a famous dude.
Words to live by

I disagree. The famous dude likely doesn't know how to diddle well, while the pale, schlubby, un-famous guy has to work at it, and therefore does it better.

Posted by: ncnn at October 10, 2009 3:28 AM

Well, for once we've been provided with that rarest of commodities, Truth in Advertising. Because everything you wrote about this one, DR, was evident from the TV ads. Pass.
---
"It’s because the [shlubby] pale, beer-bellied men wrote, directed, and produced the movie)."

I have several of those bases covered. So all I have to do is write, direct and produce a movie and it's hot chicks forever?

*pulls out crayons and notepad*
---
"who hate each other and are waiting only for their daughter to graduate high school before they decide to go off and fuck other people."

Heh. Reminds me of one of my favorite jokes.

An ancient man and woman show up at a lawyer's office one day. Lawyer says "What can I do for you?"

Ancient man says, "My name is Harry Smith, I'm 98 years old. This is my wife, Hannah, she's 96. We've been married 80 years and we've despised each other for the past 75, and we want a divorce."

Lawyer says, "You're only getting a divorce now? Why?"

Ancient woman says, "We wanted to wait until the children were dead."

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at October 10, 2009 10:11 AM

Also, those pineapple chunks I have in the fridge that I was planning on skewering with shrimp and peppers and potatoes and broiling for lunch today? I think I have to pass on that now. *retch*

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at October 10, 2009 10:15 AM

Laredo wrote: ...or perhaps Ferris Bueller as a lounge singer. That film was the zenith of the Favraughn collaborative; the nadir refreshes each year.

That's just funny. And who wouldn't want to be Ferris Bueller as a lounge singer?

Meanwhile, nice to see Kristen Davis getting other work. She's easily the most attractive of the four horses of the shoe-pacolypse. Next installment has been announced - Part-Thirteen, Big Gets Bigger - A New Hope. (from Lucasfilm, of course.) Could this film be a Marissa Tomei-style boobies and actrissin' career-reset, with somee hot K on K bikini action?

No? Le sigh. (Full disclosure: I am so shallow.)

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at October 10, 2009 10:52 AM

What was Jennifer Aniston thinking? Maybe had 1 too many.

Posted by: Jim Forrester at October 10, 2009 12:22 PM

You guys really need the Weekend Diversions up earlier. I've gotta work every other Saturday for a while and for entertainment I resorted to reading the infamous "Observe & Report" comment thread (finally saw the flick this week) in its entirety. That was a fun time. So I REALLY could use some fresh diversioning. Come on, throw me a frickin' bone here! Maybe launch it on Friday nights?

Posted by: TylerDFC at October 10, 2009 2:30 PM

What a shock! Based on the trailer I was expecting the next Citizen Kane!

Posted by: John W at October 10, 2009 2:31 PM

BierceAmbrose -- the four horses of the shoe-pacolypse!
Because SarahTooManyNamesParker looks like a horse!
Wonderful.

Posted by: esme at October 10, 2009 4:20 PM

Poor Ralphie...he should have shot his eye out....

Posted by: Yay! It's Cap'n SausageFingers! at October 10, 2009 4:21 PM

Thanks esme. I try. Unless that was sarcasm. In that case, well played.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at October 10, 2009 6:22 PM

That was probably the finest movie review I've ever laid eyes one. Knocked that one out the ballpark, Rowles.

Posted by: krza at October 10, 2009 9:09 PM

Are you looking for sexy wealthy men/beautiful women to date? This is the premier dating community that will fit your requirements. Start searching on "Militaryflirting.c o m" today,
you never know what tomorrow may bring.

Posted by: lily at October 11, 2009 9:08 AM

Kristen’s Bell’s talent mostly resides in her bikini area

Reefer Madness, Veronica Mars, Roman, and Forgetting Sarah Marshall suggest otherwise (full disclosure: she does have a nice rack and might have won Supporting Actress at Austin Fantastic Fest for said rack in Roman).

Great review of a film that clearly didn't deserve it, Dustin.

Posted by: Robert at October 11, 2009 1:28 PM

I've noticed that almost everything I visit pajiba, there's an ad for Couples Retreat.

Kinda ironic that the movie you said sucks so badly has been one of your main advertisers this past month.

Goes to show Dustin can't be bought...wonder if the people who placed said ad with you will pull it now, or do they even bother to read the reviews?

Just-a-wondering...

Posted by: Ms. Mix & Bitch at October 11, 2009 6:19 PM

Meant to write everytime not everything.

Posted by: Ms. Mix & Bitch at October 11, 2009 6:22 PM

I guess I'll put Swingers in the Netflix queue, and I suppose I'll enjoy it because almost any good performance could exceed my low expectations.

We'll see how it goes.

Posted by: Cat at October 11, 2009 10:42 PM

@Yay! "Poor Ralphie...he should have shot his eye out...."
Very funny, and he just might now.

Posted by: KCjersey at October 12, 2009 1:18 AM

it nailed the top spot at the box office because most people go to
the movies for 120 minutes of mindless entertainment. this movie
is instantly forgettable and will inspire not a single post-flick
conversation but the matinee i saw cost 3 bucks an hour and it was worth it. it still surprises me that this trashy film is trashed while
judd apatow's movies are reviewed as if they offer deep insights
into the nature of man.

Posted by: snake at October 13, 2009 1:48 AM

Good god. You people are verbal diarrheaing uncontrollably. Is it sympathy verbal diarrhea for the review? Or are you all entering some ass-talking competition? The full disclosure joke was funny maybe three times. With how much the reviewer overused it, I'm not going to take their judgment of comedy too seriously. You're all whiners. Try laughing once in awhile, it's fun. Kristen Bell is a goddess, and who the hell WOULDN'T take a gig in Bora Bora? You're all so full of crap it's ridiculous.

Posted by: You at October 14, 2009 4:00 AM

this was the first full-on collaboration between the two since Doug Liman’s seminal ’90s comedy, Swingers ....?

What about "Made"?

Posted by: wickedwhisper at October 15, 2009 11:19 PM

you say (full disclosure) alot. i didn't like the movie, and now i don't like you. i think your a cunt

Posted by: james at October 28, 2009 3:40 PM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment:



Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.