web
counter
 

Scorsese's New Muse? Not So Fast.

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Career Assessments | Comments (42)



DiCaprio1sm.jpg

Subject: Leonardo Wilhelm DiCaprio, 36-year-old American actor

Date of Assessment: February 19, 2010

Positive Buzzwords: Professional, dedicated, charismatic

Negative Buzzwords: Heartthrob, brooding, typecast

The Case: Honestly, who would have thought that a young actor who made his big-screen debut in Critters 3: You Are What They Eat would go on to become the next so-called muse of Martin Scorsese? Together, Leonardo DiCaprio and Scorsese have teamed up for Gangs of New York, The Aviator, The Departed, and, finally, this weekend’s Shutter Island. This love affair ain’t over yet, for there are two more possible projects — with Wall Street corruption and Viking adventure themes — under consideration by the pair. Yet another possibility lies within the rumor that Scorsese has DiCaprio earmarked for a Frank Sinatra biopic. And since Scorsese made nine films with Robert De Niro (over a period of twenty-three years), his long-running fascination with an actor shouldn’t come as terribly surprising news. Yet, in the long run, is this really the best career move for DiCaprio?

First, let’s reflect upon how this all happened… it seems that, at a relatively early age and shortly after the aforementioned Critters 3, DiCaprio caught the eye of Robert De Niro himself during an audition for This Boy’s LIfe, in which DiCaprio won the role of De Niro’s son. The young bloke went on, shortly thereafter, to give such an outstanding performance in the quirky-as-hell What’s Eating Gilbert Grape? that he received his first Oscar nomination at age 19. A few years later, DiCaprio had sufficiently diversified his resume; but then made a decision he later regretted by turning down the lead role in Boogie Nights (yes, Dirk Diggler) to play Jack Dawson in James Cameron’s Titanic, a sprawling epic that caused “Leomania” to reach a worldwide frenzy of swooning teenage girls. Titanic, along with Romeo + Juliet, sealed his fate as a reliable and dashing leading man, not to mention a bankable one who has settled at around $20 million per film. However, the commercial success of Titanic overshadowed DiCaprio’s former critical acclaim and left him facing a future as a romantic leading man. Rather than quit the acting business, which was his initial reaction, DiCaprio took a few tentative steps with The Man in the Iron Mask (a commercial and critical success) and The Beach (a bare-chested failure on both ends) but then found himself without a clue as to where his career was headed.

It was then that De Niro convinced Scorsese to cast DiCaprio in Gangs of New York, and, from that point on, this actor-director bond has predominated most discussion of DiCaprio’s legacy thus far. And, yes, these two have created some pretty great films. However, despite a brief respite in Steven Spielberg’s relatively light-hearted Catch Me If You Can, the past decade of DiCaprio’s career has been painted in monochromatic shades of darkly dramatic roles — from characters disillusioned with suburbia to hardened law enforcement types to those with serious mental illness — one ultimately realizes that a DiCaprio film won’t be a carefree, exuberant romp. Although this period in his career has remained financially lucrative, and he has earned two more Oscar nominations for The Aviator and Blood Diamond (under director Edward Zwick), it’s quite easy to believe that the almighty pursuit of the Oscar is now driving DiCaprio’s choice of roles. As Leo throws himself headlong into each movie, he emotes as if his very essence depends upon playing a role while maintaining a sense of artificiality about it all. One never really forgets that it is Leonardo DiCaprio, actor, who graces the celluloid screen, rather than the characters that he should embody. Of course, the fact that DiCaprio makes a habit of appearing alongside actors such as Daniel Day-Lewis (Gangs of New York) and Kate Winslet (Revolutionary Road) — who both consistently deliver remarkably subtle and nuanced performances — the difference of abilities is quite obvious. Perhaps, to gain some perspective, DiCaprio needs to step away from the Scorsese’s virtual umbilical cord for more than just a movie at a time.

Look, I know that Leonardo DiCaprio has essentially crawled up Scorsese’s ass and awaits further instructions to do as he pleases. Leo seems to fancy himself the next Robert De Niro, but does he really know what he’s asking for? Sure, it’s a respectable career, but it’s going to be followed by a sharp decline. One day, DiCaprio may wake up to find himself starring in a remake of Meet the Fockers and appearing with Kate Winslet in Righteous Kill 2: Worst Twist Ending Since M. Night Shyamalan. And it won’t be nearly as pretty a spectacle as Titanic fangirls would like to believe.

Prognosis: With no less than twenty-seven “In Development” credits on IMDb, DiCaprio has no future financial worries of which to speak. However, he’s reached the point where all this seriousness puts him in jeopardy of unintentional self-parody. Just as Christian Bale has become known for his intensity and periodic bursts of shouting at the camera, DiCaprio has become a mass of furrowed eyebrows, random facial hair, and mislaid Bostonian accents. If his early career is any indication, Leonardo DiCaprio is capable of much more than that.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba Love 02/19/10 | Shutter Island Review









Comments

Very accurate assessment, AB. I like Leo, but I'm not rushing to see his movies because I feel like they're all the same, or he's playing variations of the same character as of late. But I was impressed with him in Revolutionary Road.

Although doing a film with Scorcese practically guarantees success, I hated The Aviator and Gangs of New York. DiCaprio might be Scorcese's new pet, but he needs to try something different. I would love to see him try a comedic role to see if he could handle it.

Posted by: Brie at February 19, 2010 2:27 PM

One never really forgets that it is Leonardo DiCaprio, actor, who graces the celluloid screen, rather than the characters that he should embody

I have to disagree with this particular assessment. Leo DiCaprio used to be an actor who I found downright annoying and rarely liked his roles. However, in recent years I've really enjoyed the projects he's taken on and I like the darker side of him. I have no problem believing him as his characters and in fact, I sometimes will see a movie I may not have had interest in because he is in it (The Aviator, Blood Diamond are both good examples of that).

I do agree though that he may end up in unintentional self parody, it wouldn't hurt him to take a more light-hearted role in the vein of Catch Me If You Can every now and then.

Posted by: Even Stevens at February 19, 2010 2:27 PM

I thought DiCaprio actually sparked something in The Depahted. He had left me cold for years with Gangs of New York, etc. But in The Depahted, and Blood Diamond, man that sucker was emoting and not just showing off with his ability with accents. I'm fully on the band wagon.

Posted by: coveredinbees at February 19, 2010 2:42 PM

I've come to really like and respect DiCaprio's work, particularly after The Departed. He was great in that, and I think he should stick to playing modern characters, as opposed to more 'olde timey' ones. I hated him in Gangs of New York. He looked all wrong for the part--he was too pretty, too frail, too modern, somehow. And he just looked so much like a frail little kid. I didn't really take him seriously until The Departed because he fit that role. I just wish his and Scorsese's bromance sticks to casting him in the right movies, where his persona doesn't clash with the character.

Posted by: figgy at February 19, 2010 2:56 PM

And he was excellent in The Basket Ball Dairies.

Posted by: bob at February 19, 2010 2:58 PM

I loved him in The Basketball Diaries. Such a damned good and horribly sad movie. I like Leo. I have hated a fair share of his movie, most notably The Beach, which I've never finished. I thought he was excellent in The Depahted and Blood Diamond. It would be real nice to see him play something lighthearted and fun again.

Posted by: Melody at February 19, 2010 3:20 PM

As some one who likes everything Marty makes, I thought since the Aviator, seen many times, that Leo doesn't look like a Kid anymore.

But he indeed stays Leo.

Posted by: Magiel at February 19, 2010 3:20 PM

Gotta admit, with all of these forgotten gems resurfacing, you want him to be worse than he actually is.

As far as creative relationships go, once you find someone who "gets it", i.e., some sort of creative synergy, you don't just leave it at the drop of a what-the-fuck. Realize that some artistic relationships are possibly deeper than any other relationship you'll be able to fathom in your 3-dimensional existence.

Think of the path he could have gone after Titanic, but decided to put effort and thought into the roles he selected afterward. By Hollywood's standards, he's above-board.

Posted by: Recondite at February 19, 2010 3:21 PM

The Departed bought a lot of guys, Leo included, lifetime passes in my book. Love that movie.

Posted by: ChristianH at February 19, 2010 3:39 PM

I thought I was the only one who always hears it (in my mind) as "The DePAHted." I hear it in Matt Damon's voice.

I know this site is always thick with "Titanic" hate, but I liked it and part of the reason is DiCaprio. You could absolutely understand why the rich chick would leave that asshole she was engaged to so she could die (as far as she knew) with Leo on the ship.

Posted by: Slash at February 19, 2010 4:18 PM

Revolutionary "Rode"?

Is that a porno?

Posted by: Todd at February 19, 2010 4:34 PM

I'll join in on the Leo love (or at least like). I also have to disagree, he is one of the few actors that I do think disappears into the character and I don't feel like I am watching the "acting" (in comparison to, say, Sean Penn where he might as well wear a neon sign around his neck that flashes "I'm emoting").

Then again, I seem to be the only person who like Gangs of New York (and, sacrilege, thought Leo was more natural and less "actory" than DDL in it).

Posted by: maceo at February 19, 2010 4:48 PM

Dude if it's stars Kate Winslet, that is a porno I'm BUYING.

Posted by: coveredinbees at February 19, 2010 4:52 PM

He's a fucking GREAT actor, and he isn't even in his prime yet. I'm almost sick with jealousy, frankly --- it's tempered by huge admiration.

I cannot WAIT to watch this man grow and learn.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at February 19, 2010 5:05 PM

if it's? blargh

Posted by: coveredinbees at February 19, 2010 5:05 PM

Maceo, Sean Penn wears that sign and his "I'm better than you" sign every day of his life, acting or not.

Posted by: Melody at February 19, 2010 5:09 PM

No mention of Inception? Big summer sci-fi action epic from the director of The Dark Knight isn't lighthearted exactly, but it's an interesting change of pace for DiCaprio and I hope it pays off.

Posted by: Tim at February 19, 2010 5:13 PM

Have yet to see him in something that he totally didn't own. Though I found Revolutionary Road to be incredibly depressing. Loved him in Catch Me If You Can.

Posted by: grace b at February 19, 2010 5:18 PM

oH MAN, i CAN'T WAIT UNTIL "iNCEPTION."

sOMTIMES i FORGET THE CAPS LOCK IS ON, APPARENTLY.

Posted by: superasente at February 19, 2010 6:22 PM

yep- was just scrolling down to see if anyone else thought it was a little weird for this piece to not mention Inception. That's fairly significant...

Posted by: dg at February 19, 2010 7:02 PM

I like Leo; I loved him in The Depahted (you mean that isn't the actual title of the movie).

That said, this assessment was spot-on, and I do wish he'd show a little more range from time to time.

He should do a musical or something. Or one of the Step Up movies to show us that he's not just a brooding one-trick pony.

Posted by: Jelinas at February 19, 2010 8:19 PM

There was one bit in Titanic when I turned to The Girlfriend and muttered, "He looks like a manic chipmunk."

Thanks to this article I now know more about this guy than I ever wanted to know, and now I'll have to drip chlorine bleach into my cranium to wash that crap out.

Posted by: The Wanderer at February 19, 2010 9:23 PM

If Leo put on about 15 lbs of muscle, I'd see him as a man. Until then he's still that skinny kid from Growing Pains.

Or was it Who's the Boss?

::shrugs::

Posted by: ceejeemcbeegee at February 19, 2010 11:57 PM

First of all, tooooootally Growing Pains. Second of all, I think he's got fifteen extra pounds on his face, specifically in the Cro-Magnon brow ridge area. Does that help?

(still love him).

Posted by: coveredinbees at February 20, 2010 2:06 AM

You think The Man in the Iron Mask was a critical success and don't even mention his BREAK-OUT role in Growing Pains? You are dead to me.

True story: Around the Titanic era, I made a Leo Binder. I cut out pictures of and articles about him, and carefully placed each one in a sheet protector in a gigantic, glorious white binder. I can also remember at least three other friends who had Leo Walls-same idea as my Binder, but not as long-lasting. I still have that fucking binder, but where are there precious, non-sheet-protected Leo pictures noiw, huh?

Posted by: SaBrina (aka HC Valentine) at February 20, 2010 4:18 AM

Shit, there instead of their and "noiw"? I really am drunk.

Posted by: SaBrina at February 20, 2010 4:19 AM

I find the whole LD debate bizarre: I can't think of movies in which he hasn't been excellent. Why is he still being bandied about as a teen king who's happened to have a few meaty roles?

As to Revolutionary Road (Todd: LOVE the porn name), I thought he blew Winslet off the screen, and I love Kate. To this day I don't know why she got all the accolades for that movie. I thought she was histrionic and flat where he was nuanced.

Posted by: samantha t at February 20, 2010 8:23 AM

Of course, the fact that DiCaprio makes a habit of appearing alongside actors such as Daniel Day-Lewis (Gangs of New York) and Kate Winslet (Revolutionary Road)—who both consistently deliver remarkably subtle and nuanced performances—the difference of abilities is quite obvious.

I'm sorry, but is this a joke? When I think of subtle and nuanced, I can't say I ever think of Daniel Day-Lewis. His performance in Gangs of New York was one of the most histrionic things I've ever seen.

I agree with Samantha. This Leo "debate" is bizarre. He's excellent in everything. Period. He OWNED The Departed, and the complete lack of recognition for his work in Revolutionary Road just baffles my mind. I'm running to see Shutter Island.

Posted by: Melissa at February 20, 2010 2:51 PM

If the "negative buzzwords" are heartthrob and brooding I think Leo's going to be fine. He has access to the best directors in the business and that will make all the difference and keep him from winding up in a Meet The Fockers remake (though there would be a certain irony-what with the Focker movies being largely responsible for DeNiro's tumble off the serious acting mountain). Like Cruise, DiCaprio has shown an enviable knack for only working with exceptional directors.

Posted by: ed newman at February 20, 2010 10:15 PM

When I think of subtle and nuanced, I can't say I ever think of Daniel Day-Lewis. His performance in Gangs of New York was one of the most histrionic things I've ever seen.

But that was the entire point: Daniel Day-Lewis played Bill as a man who knew how to play to the crowd. If it had been all histrionics, there wouldn't have been those quieter scenes where Bill's just taking a moment to allow himself to be a tired aging man. That's why it was such a great performance.

And I'm totally with the "lay off Leo" crowd and have been for years. Dude has earned his career ten times over.

Posted by: mightygodking at February 21, 2010 12:45 AM

Yeah, DDL had his histrionic moments in Gangs, as he stated, "The spectacle of fearsome acts" keeps his power in line, but he also had a brooding side that occasionally bubbled to the surface. For DiCaprio's character to expect those subterranean aspects of Bill to be absent when he tries to assassinate him causes him to be put up as the example of this type of object lesson he's teaching the prominent luminaries in his midst. Histrionics and showmanship were key components of his character.

He (DiCaprio) receives a face battering by a face and is put up like meat for the audience to see butchered.

Damn that scene is like mainlining caramel.

Or something.

Posted by: Recondite at February 21, 2010 1:55 AM

I see your point, but I still feel like DDL plays that character too often... histrionic moments followed by quiet ones. I'm also one of the few who did not enjoy There Will Be Blood. Enough about DDL though... I'm more interested in this idea of mainlining caramel. Now, THAT'S something I could get into :)

Posted by: Melissa at February 21, 2010 8:55 AM

i disagree with most of this assessment. Daniel Day-Lewis is a heavy-handed ham - there's never anything subtle about his performances. Leonardo keeps growing as an actor. he keeps getting better and better. somebody needs to get that stick out of her a** and look at a few more of his movies with an open mind.

Posted by: la chica at February 21, 2010 9:50 AM

Congratulations to Leo on reaching puberty.

DDL was the only thing that did not suck about Gangs of New York.

Also, Maryscott? LD is 36? What the hell is he waiting for?

Posted by: Janis at February 22, 2010 3:33 AM

Am I the only one who remembers "The Quick and the Dead"? Never thought I would say this but I should've done more drugs in the '90s...

Posted by: cinekat at February 22, 2010 4:52 AM

My (somewhat half-assed) theory? Really good-looking actors fall prey to their acting abilities being overlooked (DiCaprio) whereas really good-looking actresses are often overrated (Portman, Deschanel).

Posted by: samantha t at February 22, 2010 7:19 AM

He's a damn good actor, but I'd like to see him loosen up, maybe in a comedy or two, it'd be fun if done right. (Though painful if not.)

Posted by: George at February 22, 2010 1:06 PM

An article on Leonardo DiCaprio's merit and no mention of his role as one of the founders of the Pussy Posse? Absurd.

Posted by: burpany at February 22, 2010 2:12 PM

This is not on topic with this OP in any way - but in response to Samantha T - I like your theory - but wow I think Deschanel is average looking at absolute best. Ugh.

Posted by: eden at February 22, 2010 10:01 PM

Leo Decap does do a fairly good job at what he does, but what kind of man sould play a tough guy and not want to beef himself up. Come on! He plays a tough guy in most of his movies but he does not have a tough guy body. HE DOES need to put about 15 pounds of muscle on! In the departed he sucked his belly in to make himself look like he was in shape (the bed scene where he made it with in Doc.). He needs to MUSCLE UP!

Posted by: Stew at November 19, 2010 1:23 PM

i love leo! but i liked him better with blond hair.... oh well he looks good both ways!!!!

Posted by: leofan1 at December 1, 2010 1:42 PM

Last but not least! Another,bright submit upto a look . Thanks meant for writing it creative and also educated remarks using the environment.

Posted by: Denice Pavese at January 6, 2011 12:11 PM