web
counter
 

Disarming You with a Smile

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Career Assessments | Comments (51)



seyfried9.jpg

Subject:Amanda Seyfried, 24-year-old American actress and Hollywood “It girl”

Date of Assessment: February 5, 2010

Positive Buzzwords: Driven, diverse, disarming, damn gorgeous

Negative Buzzwords: Nada, zilch, zippo

The Case: This impossibly pretty (in an almost alien-like way) blonde got her start in in soap operas and a supporting role in Mean Girls. Then, television came calling again, and Amanda Seyfried graced the small screen in a recurring role as a dead girl in “Veronica Mars” and, most recently, as the conflicted daughter of a polygamous Mormon in HBO’s “Big Love.” Finally, that inevitable breakthrough role arrived in an unlikely vehicle, the film adaptation of the Mamma Mia! musical (hey, the girl can sing), which launched her onto the global pop culture radar alongside the likes of Meryl Streep and Colin Firth. Now, Seyfried has decided to leave “Big Love” after the fourth season and gamble it all upon her budding film career.

Odds of continued success are favorable, to say the very least.

Everything depends upon Seyfried’s current arsenal of upcoming films. Dear John gives her a headlining role, along with the oft-shirtless Channing Tatum, which shall initiate her into the drivel of Nicholas Sparks adaptations. Letters to Juliet has generated a bit of buzz as a romanic dramedy. Chloe, which is perhaps the most anticipated of these three films, is a thriller that features Seyfried in the title role (and getting pretty damn naked) with co-stars Liam Neeson and Julianne Moore. With these three films, Seyfried continues to diversify her career and avoid typecasting herself as a token bubbly blonde romcom queen. So far, Seyfried seems made of teflon; in fact, her lone career mishap, Jennifer’s Body, was a box-office disaster, but its failure, despite nearly destroying the myth of Megan Fox, hasn’t affected Seyfried’s career path much at all. Of course, Seyfried also doesn’t greet the press with double entendres and otherwise shoot her mouth off in manner of you-know-who. Instead, this freakishly gorgeous blonde prefers to stay out of the tabloids, listen to her agents, and merely concentrate upon her acting career instead of squandering time and goodwill by dropping salacious quotes about sex.

Here’s what worries me about Miss Amanda. After a few decades of following a bit too much of her agents’ advice, she’ll start to age, and then she’ll start worrying about fading youth and whatnot. All it will take is a slight push (just like the one from her agent to do nudity in Chloe), and Amanda may very well allow some overbearing plastic surgeon to ruin her face. This might sound like a bit of a far-fetched scenario, but remember how cute Meg Ryan was until she got all botoxed-up, collagen-filled, and whatever else she’s had done to make herself look like the Joker? And so follows the frozen face, lost roles, and eventual claims of an ageist film industry. Even though, I assure you, if George Clooney froze his face, he’d lose plenty of role opportunities as well. Now, I’m about to go off on a mini-tangent, but ageism really does work both ways in Hollywood. Aside from Leonard DiCaprio, it’s pretty damn rare for a very young actor to achieve superstardom, sustain marketability after leaving the “heartthrob” phase, and, unbelievably, go on to receive critical acclaim. Most respectable actors don’t bloom until much later in their careers than the typical “teen idol” types; conversely, actresses tend to peak at a much younger age before, inevitably, embarrassing themselves by crying during their Academy Award speeches, following up with some self-serious movies that no one wants to see, and then overcompensating for their box office losses by hitting the botox. After these ladies have sufficiently insured that they can no longer move their faces and express emotion, which is what their job requires, they conclude that their failing career is all the fault of The Man. What I’m trying to say here is that, damn, I hope Amanda Seyfried doesn’t fuck up her career this way.

Prognosis: Seyfried is on the right path for continued success and career growth, but she should stick with films that also star established actors and actresses to learn their techniques. While she’s a slight pushover about doing nudity, we certainly don’t mind seeing the girl naked. Above all, Amanda Seyfried should be prohibited from co-starring with Megan Fox ever again.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.









Super Bowl XLIV Coverage | Pajiba Love 02/04510













Comments

A mere handful of actresses have avoided the pitfalls you have described - Jodie Foster, Sigourney Weaver and, of course, Meryl Streep come to mind immediately.
What all three have in common, aside from tremendous talent, is a strong sense of self-worth and determination not to succumb to pressure. My hope for the lovely Miss Seyfried is that she possesses same and looks to those women for inspiration.

Posted by: Spender at February 5, 2010 12:13 PM

So your assessment of a young girl's career is that she has a few movies coming out soon, but more importantly, she's really really pretty and you hope that in 40 or 50 years from now she doesn't get Botox? OK.

Posted by: SaBrina at February 5, 2010 12:13 PM

I have always had such a soft spot for Amanda Seyfried. She was one of the best parts of Mean Girls, rocked the hell out of Veronica Mars in her Laura Palmer-esque role, and is so friggin endearing on Big Love. Hell, I even liked her in Jennifer's Body, despite that movie's... slight... lack of quality. I really do hope she doesn't screw up her beautiful alien face, but I don't think she will.

Posted by: Marcela at February 5, 2010 12:21 PM

While she’s a slight pushover about doing nudity, we certainly don’t mind seeing the girl naked.

Preach! However, Cloe has some pretty serious star power with Neeson and Moore. Although Moore has kind of dropped off the radar a bit.

Posted by: admin at February 5, 2010 12:21 PM

Two days and two great songs referenced in the title lines of articles. Sweet.

Posted by: Pandemic at February 5, 2010 12:26 PM

Look. The Hollywood movie business is sexist. It's run for the most part by old men with oodles of cash who want to convince themselves that younger beautiful women are attracted to men who are old enough to have fought in the Napoleonic Wars. If an actor (male or female) is lucky enough to make it in the first place and earn some very good money and have a career for let's say ten good years, then he or she is already living a more charmed existence than 99% of the human race. Do I care if studios stop casting you when you turn 33? Nope. You knew the game when you went in. Do you think any of these young actors ever say, "I'm turning down the role because I believe an older woman with some wrinkles would be so much more age appropriate in the role?" Nope.
If you choose to mangle your face in pursuit of some lost ideal of youth, fine. Piss your money away like that. Just stop moaning about how unfair Hollywood because yeah, it's unfair. So is life. Also, so is corporate America. Have you ever seen a woman who doesn't dress/look and act in the corporate way make it to a senior leadership position? Nope.

Posted by: PaddyDog at February 5, 2010 12:33 PM

I want to wrap myself in her hair and use it as a blanket. Great hair is a rare and glorious thing.

Posted by: becks at February 5, 2010 12:33 PM

Dammit, don't make me miss FameTracker! It still hurts, dammit!

Posted by: Jay at February 5, 2010 12:38 PM

For the record, if you think about it for a few minutes, there are a lot of men in Hollywood who have successfully transitioned from the 'young heart throb' to the 'old and critically acclaimed leading man'.

Posted by: becks at February 5, 2010 12:38 PM

Am I the only person who thinks she looks a little off? I mean I understand that she's pretty, but she seems not as hot I'm being told...

(p.s. she kinda looks like Goldie Hawn in the banner or am I caaaarazy?)

Posted by: D-Day at February 5, 2010 12:39 PM

"Morman"

That's fun to say.

Posted by: Moostache Police at February 5, 2010 12:49 PM

My boyfriend says he thinks she's not particularly pretty D-Day (he thinks her features are too big, especially the eyes) so you're not alone. I think when she's done up just right she's stunning though. The header picture is gorgeous. Plus she seems sweet in her movies and television shows(though a little dumb in real life. Meryl, she ain't).

Posted by: becks at February 5, 2010 12:49 PM

I've heard some people claim that she's not attractive because her eyes are too far apart. I've also heard people say that Anne Hathaway isn't attractive because her eyes are too big.

Those people are very, very wrong, but whatever...

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at February 5, 2010 1:03 PM

I heard a commercial for Dear John pronounce her name like "Sci-fred" and I was kind of annoyed. That's not how it's pronounced in my head, dammit!

Just watched Jennifer's Body last night, and I thought she was definitely the best part about it. I've always thought she was gorgeous, even in that movie where she is supposed to be some nerdy dweeb (with big puffy sleeves).

Posted by: Snath at February 5, 2010 1:05 PM

I think that she is a decent enough actress, and I think that it is a good career move that she is bailing from Big Love. I have been watching that show since the start, and at this point I am just barely still watching it.

Posted by: Alli at February 5, 2010 1:22 PM

remember how cute Meg Ryan was until she got all botoxed-up, collagen-filled, and whatever else she’s had done to make herself look like the Joker?

NO.
She is, has always been, and likely will always be so annoying that any physical attribute, good or bad, will seem inconsequential when compared to her incredible pedantry.

Posted by: esme at February 5, 2010 1:49 PM

I love Amanda Seyfried - just love her. And I'll say this, D-Day and becks- perhaps you don't think she's a 10, and I understand getting annoyed by people who insist you find someone attractive even though that someone just isn't your type; however, wouldn't you much rather watch someone with atypical features and an interesting face - like Amanda or Maggie Gyllenhaal or Ann Hathaway - than someone who's traditionally beautiful but can't emote properly - like Sienna Miller, or Katie Holmes, or Megan Fox? And I often feel like being a good actor makes a person more attractive than if they were traditionally pretty to begin with and just sucked.

Posted by: Marra at February 5, 2010 1:49 PM

The interesting thing is that something about her eyes makes her look like she could be related to her TV mother, Jeanne Tripplehorn. But I can't look at Jeanne for very long - something about her eyes makes me whacky. They make me think if I look at her too long, I'll go cross-eyed.

What I really can't understand about so many of today's actresses is why they have to go to the furthest extreme with their anti-aging efforts. How can so many women think having their faces completely poofed out, shiny and devoid of any sign of their previous selves looks good? Half of them look like someone inflated a balloon under their skin, all puffy and floaty. Less is more, ladies. I can understand wanting to look younger than you are, but trying to have the skin of a teenager just makes you look foolish.

Posted by: Cindy at February 5, 2010 1:53 PM

Well actually Marra I feel like I said a lot of great things about her. I really don't understand your comment.

Posted by: becks at February 5, 2010 1:56 PM

My comment was that I think she's beautiful and that I thought people only find her a little funny looking when her make-up artist or stylist do a bad job complimenting her large features.

Posted by: becks at February 5, 2010 1:59 PM

She looks like Dakota Fanning, her career will stall.

Posted by: ThunderSacTriumph at February 5, 2010 2:09 PM

My bad, becks, I didn't mean to include you in the beginning at all - just d-day; I meant to type "And I'll say this d-day...blah blah blah...and piggybacking on what becks said, I often feel like blah blah blah." I meant to back you up on her seeming sweet and how that makes me like her more; but I type my comments in a work email so as to avoid my boss detecting non-work-related internet activities, and I just have criminal copy+paste skills.

Posted by: Marra at February 5, 2010 2:18 PM

Hahaha, oh good, I was scared you thought I had bad taste in chicks! If anything my gushing has probably led many people to believe I'm a lesbian!

I was horrified when my boyfriend said he didn't find her attractive. This is a man who thinks early-years Pam Anderson is the height of female beauty. Does he not realize the irony of calling Pam Anderson hot and then claiming he doesn't like Amanda Seyfried due to HER exaggerated features!

Posted by: becks at February 5, 2010 2:28 PM

Pam Anderson is one of those people who I just never understood - even my brother, who's 21 and has missed the Pam Anderson is so hot fad by like, 15 years, thinks she's hot as hell. Why? I get that she has a fun personality; she's funny, accessible, self-aware - that's all great. And I can deal with the painted-on eyebrows and the bad lipliner and the bleached-out straw hair and the fake tan. But she has tupperware titties! TUPPERWARE TITTIES! It's just not an acceptible beauty standard! It's like if some guy got a penis enlargement by surgically implanting a can of pringles in there - the skin would be too tight, and it's too big to do anything with, and it just makes you look like a caricature.

Posted by: Marra at February 5, 2010 3:22 PM

Hahaha, Moostache Police, I read that and immediately pictured this blond, blue-eyed superhero who wears his special Mormon undergarments on the outside of his leotard (complete with short-sleeves and tie printed on the front).

To the Mormobile!

Posted by: Jelinas at February 5, 2010 3:43 PM

Two words: Nude Scene

Until then I have little interest in her career.

Posted by: Neodiogenes at February 5, 2010 5:26 PM

Until then I have little interest in her career.

Then maybe you should actually read the article.

Posted by: Jay at February 5, 2010 5:39 PM

I think the jury is still out on her acting ability. She shows lots of promise, and is not a teasing bitch like ScarJo. Did I say that out loud?

I'm looking forward to seeing more of her in the future. And by more of her, I mean... more facets of her acting. Perverts. I will say, though, that she has a body I wish more women in Hollywood would aspire to, as opposed to the stick-figures many of them are.

Posted by: logar at February 5, 2010 7:36 PM

So many beautiful women - and I AM looking at you, Mira Sorvino - allow themselves to fall under the spell and go into starvation/surgery mode when all they need do is decide to be themselves. If that means giving up Hollywood becuse the system is being run by old perverts, then they should just give it up.
And I should just call up Steve Spielberg and say "Stevie, baby! I got a can't miss screenplay!"
The system is what it is and it's harder now than ever to break out of that prison.

I mentioned Foster/Weaver/Streep as examples of women who had the talent to say NO to the star system and forge their own paths.
I don't know if Seyfried has that kind of talent but if she does, I hope she doesn't succumb to pressure. I want to see her grow and accept challenging roles that surprise and, sure, shock some viewers and critics. I hope the same for young Ms. Fanning and the young lady in "Kick Ass" (too tired to find her name).
If you think a little... Hollywood isn't much different now than it was in the 1950's and 60's. Tuesday Weld. Sandra Dee. Famous for thirty minutes and.....gone. Still, there were those with talent and determination who beat the system and became stars.
I'm rambling, as old men do.

Carry on, young people.

Posted by: Spender at February 5, 2010 10:36 PM

WHAT header picture?

Dammit, is it your site or my PC? There's a tiny little box up there.

Posted by: , at February 5, 2010 11:39 PM

AMENDMENT: Amanda Seyfried should be prohibited from working with a Diablo Cody script, as should Ellen Page, Toni Collette, and anyone else who doesn't want to sound like the biggest indie jack-off in the entire world

Posted by: A. Biro at February 6, 2010 4:50 AM

Interested in a discrete and mutually beneficial relationship? http://AgelessOnly.com gives you a chance to make your life better.

Posted by: Patty at February 6, 2010 11:03 AM

PaddyDog, I think I love you. I hope you're a woman because I'm not ready to face that question about myself.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at February 6, 2010 11:46 AM

Seyfried's eyes are a little too far apart.
Make her look a little like an alien.
Anyway....

Posted by: Anony at February 9, 2010 5:24 PM

In my opinion her eyes ARE a bit far apart, but it makes her interesting, recognizable, and not a clone of every other blonde haired blue eyed beauty out there. I will always remember her in Mean Girls...not my favorite movie, but she played dumb so convincingly I was SHOCKED to see her in a real role to the point I wasn't even sure if it was the same actress!

Posted by: Random at February 10, 2010 4:45 PM

Uhm... that was quite interesting :)

Posted by: lavoro da casa at November 18, 2010 10:12 AM

Uhm... that was quite interesting :)

Posted by: lavoro da casa at November 18, 2010 4:27 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: Elaina Saba at January 5, 2011 2:34 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: forex trading signals at January 17, 2011 10:06 AM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: forex trading signals at January 17, 2011 3:33 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: forex trading system at January 19, 2011 12:47 AM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: forex trading system at January 19, 2011 2:37 AM

Thanks for taking the time to talk about this, I feel fervently about this and I take pleasure in learning about this topic. Please, as you gain information, please update this blog with more information. I have found it very useful.

Posted by: Andrew at February 4, 2011 4:20 PM

I have to say that Im really unimpressed with this. I mean, sure, youve got some very interesting points. But this blog is just really lacking in something. Maybe its content, maybe its just the design. I dont know. But its almost like you wrote this because everybodys doing it. No passion at all.

Posted by: Sheila at February 7, 2011 6:38 PM

I was wondering if you ever considered changing the layout of your blog? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or two images. Maybe you could space it out better?

Posted by: Belinda at February 10, 2011 11:34 PM

Thanks for taking the time to talk about this, I feel fervently about this and I take pleasure in learning about this topic. Please, as you gain information, please update this blog with more information. I have found it very useful. There have to be charging stations everywhere.

Posted by: pregnant on clomid at February 15, 2011 12:39 PM

How can I contact you?

Posted by: frontierville cheats at February 16, 2011 11:12 PM

Hi, this blog is very usefull and i like this blog so much.i'll share this blog on my facebook page.

Posted by: dasdasdasd at March 1, 2011 12:31 AM

I precisely needed to thank you very much once again. I'm not certain what I might have created without the solutions contributed by you regarding this concern. This was an absolute troublesome setting in my view, nevertheless considering your specialised avenue you treated it forced me to leap over contentment. I'm just grateful for the work and in addition sincerely hope you know what a great job you are providing training people via your site. Most probably you've never got to know all of us.

Posted by: fare soldi at March 2, 2011 8:25 AM

Sensible stuff, I anticipate reading more.

Posted by: perfect eyebrows at March 12, 2011 9:30 PM

I was recommended this blog by my cousin. I'm not sure whether this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed about my problem. You are wonderful! Thanks!

Posted by: Suzuki Motorcycles at March 19, 2011 4:19 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time