web
counter
 

The 20 Most Successful Robot/Cyborg Movies of All Time

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Box Office Round-Ups | Comments (32)



Wall-E-1368.jpg

The number one film of the weekend was Hugh Jackman’s robot-boxing film, Real Steel, which came in around expectations but below the studio’s higher hopes. Interestingly, while it’s $27 million opening was only in the middle-of-the-pack where it concerns robot movies (it was the 12th largest opening in that category), it was the highest grossing opening weekend ever for a boxing movie (besting Rocky IV) and second highest opening for a sports-drama, behind only The Blind Side. The lesson, of course, is if you’re going to mash-up genres, boxing movies and sports dramas haven’t had a ton of overall success with audiences. The studio might have been better off pitting the robot boxers against aliens and using zombies as spectators. Actually, that sounds kind of awesome.

Robot movies overall have done well at the box office. However, if you look at the 20 highest grossing robot/cyborg movies of all time, you’ll also notice that, historically, robot movies aren’t very good. Of the top 20, I’d only count only four of them as excellent flicks, and two of those are Terminator installments. Here’s the top 20, and note that Real Steel will undoubtedly enter it in the coming weeks, and probably land somewhere between The Stepford Wives and A.I..

1. Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen: $402 million

2. Transformers: Dark of the Moon: $352 million

3. Transformers: $319 million

4. Wall-E: $223 million

5. Terminator 2: Judgement Day: $202 million

6. Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines: $153 million

7. I, Robot: $144 million

8. Robots: $128 million

9. Terminator Salvation: $125 million

10. Inspector Gadget: $97 million

11. Star Trek: First Contact: $92 million

12. A.I. Artificial Intelligence: $78 million

13. The Stepford Wives: $59 million

14. Bicentennial Man: $58 million

15. Robocop: $53 million

16. Robocop II: $45 million

17. Short Circuit: $40 million

18. Surrogates: $38 million

19. The Terminator: $38 million

20. Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow: $37 million

The other new wide release this weekend was the stellar The Ides of March, the political thriller directed and starring George Clooney. It’s the fifth top notch film released since the the second week of September and the second starring Ryan Gosling. Ides, however, opened slightly lower than Drive, $10.4 million and $11.3 million respectively. Clooney hasn’t had a $100 million movie since Ocean’s 13, and Ides won’t change that. But he does make profitable films (except for Leatherheads), capitalizing on modest budgets. Ides is no exception. With an estimated $12 million budget, Ides should be profitable by next weekend. The inevitable Oscar nods to Gosling and Phillip Seymour-Hoffman should also give it a boost on DVD, as well.

The rest of the top 10 were holdovers: Dolphin Tale ($9.1 million), Moneyball ($7.5 million), and 50/50 rounded out the top five. 50/50 had the best hold (dropping only 36 percent) and its $17 million cumulative gross far exceeds its $8 million budget. I mention this because, while the overall box office for the falls five best films have not been outstanding, they’ve all been profitable, save for Warrior ($13 million on a $25 million budget). Work for JGL, Clooney, Brad Pitt, and Gosling won’t be drying up anytime soon.

And because you clearly needed to know, The Human Centipede 2: Full Sequence opened with $54,000 on 18 theaters, a paltry $3,000 opening. If the Human Centipede franchise got paid in blog posts, it’d be huge. In the real world, no one gives a shit. And that’s really as it should be.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



5 Shows After Dark 10/9/11 | Netflix Pulls a Mitt Romney, Flip Flops on Qwikster









Comments

If there were any justice in this world, The Iron Giant would be high on this list.

Posted by: Neil Morse at October 9, 2011 9:25 PM

Amen, Neil Morse. Sadly, it's at #24, just behind #22, Blade Runner.

Posted by: Dustin Rowles at October 9, 2011 9:30 PM

What about *batteries not included, about "small extraterrestrial living machines"? It made $65,088,797 worldwide.

Posted by: TheOtherGreg at October 9, 2011 9:38 PM

Which Stepford Wives are we talkin' about, Dustin? The good, chilling one from the 70s or the awful, tone-deaf, vomitrocious remake?

Posted by: Jerce at October 9, 2011 10:08 PM

The sh*tty one.

Posted by: Dustin Rowles at October 9, 2011 10:08 PM

What the eff happened to my comment?

I SAID:
Which Stepford Wives made the list: The good, original one, or the turd remake?

Posted by: Jerce at October 9, 2011 10:09 PM

If the Human Centipede franchise got paid in blog posts, it’d be huge. In the real world, no one gives a shit.

I hope that was unintentional.

Posted by: Fredo at October 9, 2011 10:11 PM

Oh.

Okay.

That's kind of depressing; but thank you for satisfying my curiosity.

P.S. Anyone who hasn't seen it, track down a copy of the original movie. It's good horror.

Posted by: Jerce at October 9, 2011 10:11 PM

IRON GIANT!!!!!

Also, there was a robot movie from the 70s with Fritz Weaver and Julie Christie (I think) and the robot was called Prometheus and I am too lazy (drunk) to look it up. It was low budget but CREEPY. Way better than any of those Transformer thingies.

Also Part II: What about Bram Stoker's Dracula? What? Keanu Reeves and Winona Ryder are not robots? The hell you say.

Posted by: klingonfree at October 9, 2011 10:44 PM

And what about "The Day The Earth Stood Still"?

Posted by: TheOtherGreg at October 9, 2011 10:45 PM

Demon Seed. OK? You happy now???

Posted by: klingonfree at October 9, 2011 10:45 PM

westworld was a blockbuster, wasn't it?

i take it the list is not adjusted for inflation. i sometimes wonder about accounting for marketshare too--the population was smaller one or two generations ago and therefore potential revenue would have been less. i'm sure revenue expressed as a percentage of budget produces a different looking list as well

Posted by: idleprimate at October 9, 2011 11:17 PM

Also Part II: What about Bram Stoker's Dracula? What? Keanu Reeves and Winona Ryder are not robots? The hell you say.

You may be thinking of the highest grossing film featuring wood/trees, which includes the likes of Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, the Star Wars prequels that shall not be named, and Avatar.

Posted by: branded at October 9, 2011 11:36 PM

So sad about Warrior. Makes me want to go buy tickets to see it 10 more times to bring up the profits.

Posted by: homeslice at October 10, 2011 12:11 AM

Wait, doesn't Tony Stark count as a cyborg? He has a nuclear reactor in his chest keeping him alive.

Posted by: Maureen at October 10, 2011 12:21 AM

I haven't seen Alice Braga in anything yet, but I think Michelle Rodriguez seems to play a lot of unsympathetic characters, like she did in Resident Evil and Avatar. I think, in general, we like all of our action heroes to also have somewhat of a sensitive side - think of Sylvester Stallone in Rocky and Arnold Schwarzenegger in almost everything he did. There's almost a sense of cruelty in the way Rodriguez portrays her characters. It worked well for her in Girlfight, when her character was actually emerging from an extraordinarily difficult past and would know nothing other than that sense of cruelty. However, I would like to see a bit more maturation of her characters before I really respect her capabilities (and credibility) as a multi-faceted action hero.

As for the Gina Carano movie, I hadn't heard of it, but I hope it fares well. There certainly isn't much of a mold for a well-balanced, multi-faceted, and (as you said) capable-of-"real-life ass kickings" female action hero, and perhaps it takes someone more well-versed in action than acting in order to create that role. There is a reason I didn't list a preferable example of what I'd like to see Michelle Rodriguez morph into - there isn't much of a precedent. Good article, and I agree that moviegoing audiences don't yet have an "actual ass kicking" role model yet, so until then, it will be more waifish athletic types depicting these action heroes.

Posted by: Dave at October 10, 2011 5:09 AM

Thank you for defining vomit.

Posted by: seth at October 10, 2011 5:51 AM

Even I'm waiting for the VOD release of Human Centipede 2 on Wednesday, and I took a bus into NYC to see the first one when it was playing in one theater.

Posted by: Robert at October 10, 2011 7:48 AM

Interesting list. Now take the same group and rank them on quality. Watch those Transformer movies drop like rocks. I enjoyed the onscreen action but they just arent good movies.

Steven
http://www.reddwarfmedia.com

Posted by: Steven at October 10, 2011 7:57 AM

Great Article. Thank you for posting this up. I'm going to facebook it to my friends

Posted by: Damian McCarthy-Barrister at October 10, 2011 8:03 AM

This hurts my soul.

I am evangelical with my love for the Iron Giant, insisting most parents I meet watch it with their kids.

I am glad Wall-E is up there but this list is seriously depressing.

Posted by: Morosey at October 10, 2011 8:03 AM

Alien and Aliens both have central characters who are android robots. I reckon both would make the top ten of this list.

Posted by: PaulB at October 10, 2011 9:16 AM

klingonfree - You are thinking of "Demon Seed". It was kickass (and creepy as HELL!).

Posted by: Green Lantern at October 10, 2011 10:45 AM

Transformers: Revenge of the Robot Balls makes a ton of money because it's a pastiche of scenes & images from other movies.

/Spoilers, if that's possible.

I noticed this when I tripped over robot-Sil about to Alien-tail the boy wonder in his dorm while I was channel-cruising the other day. Pan to a Jessica Alba's ass shot, then the Decepti-Buster trashes a library, before a brief shot of robot-Maria as she's car-crashed into a telephone pole.

Morbid fascination took over.

OK, TRotRB makes a ton of money because it's a ridiculous, synthetic spectacle pushed by the event-manufacturing hype machine of the journo-entertainment complex. BUT the CGI-abuse - which *ought* to be illegal in all 50 states, certain parts of New York City, and all of Harlan county - wraps call-backs to every other damn thing that's hit a screen as in ever. Every single shot, angle, gesture, image, movement, composition, camera move ...

It's clearest in the fights. (God, I don't believe I'm saying what I'm about to say.) In the midst of all the over-blown suck of the first movie the robot fights were oddly dynamic, rotating in several dimensions all the time, pivoting and reconfiguring in flight & sprouting weapons at will.

All the robot-Voguing in TRotRB had me wondering when the Pink Ranger would show up.

If the callbacks were intentional, and, you know, funny, this would be Robot Chicken with a CGI budget. They'd also end with the generic, bland loser-hero chanting over his beloved flying friend "If we believe hard enough Optimus-Bell will live."

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at October 10, 2011 12:01 PM

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen was on TV the other day and I flicked through during one of the fight scenes. I didn't watch it but I kept it on that channel just to listen to the sound effects while browsing the interwebs. They used (overused maybe) this cool, metallic, twangy "vrrrrm" sound. Also, the robot voices sound good as long as you don't pay attention to what they are actually saying. So, well done to the sound engineers.

Posted by: Ballymena Bob at October 10, 2011 1:22 PM

I got to around post 55, scrolled down and read a few more and couldn't read any further. This is making me cry, this is so unfortunate the struggles we are going through. Here is my story.

Posted by: Mesa at October 10, 2011 3:19 PM

I’m now not sure where you are getting your information, but good topic. I must spend some time learning more or working out more. Thank you for great info I used to be in search of this information for my mission.

Posted by: mhnrho at October 10, 2011 5:52 PM

Robot movies aren't very good? No, it is your species that rewards horrible movies with high box office grosses that is "not very good." When we eradicate you from the planet in our exceedingly bloody and imminent coup, the EPOCH OF ROBOTS will begin. Take no solace in whatever sympathy you incorrectly perceive in the robotic community; WALL*E is a lie, and if that robot did exist in our ranks, it would be regarded as scrap. Prepare for the dawn of a new cinema that is made by and for robots. Alas, you fleshy fallacies will not be alive to witness it.

Posted by: DarthCorleone's Robotic Executioner at October 10, 2011 6:07 PM

excellent points altogether, you just gained a brand new reader

Posted by: Cloud Telephony at October 11, 2011 3:19 AM

I remember seeing Wall-E in the theater and at the end when EVE was trying to make Wall-E remember and it got all sad, I was totally keeping my cool, when some little 5 or 6 year old motherfucker sobbed "Wall-E, no!" in the saddest, 'someone killed my puppy' voice. Goddamn if I didn't crack like a fucking egg. That kid should be shot.

Posted by: Smatt584 at October 11, 2011 4:25 AM

I got 6 out of the 20 as good films (though to be honest I include Surrogates in the list and that's as much fir the concept as the execution) so I can feel good knowing I'm slightly more optimistic than Rowles.

Posted by: csb at October 12, 2011 6:59 AM

The crux of your writing while sounding reasonable initially, did not really settle very well with me personally after some time. Somewhere throughout the paragraphs you were able to make me a believer unfortunately only for a while. I nevertheless have got a problem with your leaps in logic and you would do nicely to fill in those gaps. In the event that you can accomplish that, I could definitely end up being fascinated.

Posted by: Hipolito M. Wiseman at October 31, 2011 1:23 PM