web
counter
 

The 20 Highest Grossing Historical Fiction Movies of All Time

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Box Office Round-Ups | Comments (23)



IndianaJonesAndTheTempleOfDoom.jpg

The weekend at the box office was not at all what studios were expecting, as two sequels that were expected to dominate the weekend dominated with less force than anticipated. Sherlock Holmes: The Game of Shadows did manage to open at number one with $40 million, but that’s a punch in the gut after the $62 million opening of the first movie. Granted, I believe that the original opened on Christmas Day — a bigger weekend — but even still, Game of Shadows couldn’t match the $44 million opening of Tron: Legacy over the same weekend last year.

What is up with that? Reviews were generally positive, the competition wasn’t particularly fierce (though, it will be next weekend), and Robert Downey, Jr. doesn’t seem to have lost his luster. Why did only boatloads show up instead of sh*tloads?

The other disappointing opening I don’t feel so bad about: Alvin and the Chipmunks 3: Chipwrecked in Space opened with only $23.5 million, half of the sequel’s opening weekend of $44.3 million. Why? I don’t really care to explore it. Because the movie was terrible?

The lone bright spot on the weekend was the limited IMAX-only release of Mission Impossible Ghost Protocol, which had the biggest limited release of all time (for a movie released in less than 600 theaters), besting Bridget Jones: Edge of Reason in that category. Ghost Protocol earned $13 million in only 425 theaters, although it did have the benefit of higher IMAX ticket prices. I actually went and saw it twice, although that was in part to see the The Dark Knight Rises prologue. Because I’ve been so adamant about avoiding spoilers, I have barely followed news coverage of the movie, and I thought the prologue would be playing before every IMAX screening of Ghost Protocol (it only played in 42 locations, and I hate those locations). Anyway, TK will have the review up of Ghost Protocol today at noon. I won’t spoiler it, except to say that I completely agree.

In fourth and fifth were last week’s top two movies, New Year’s Day and The Sitter, both of which had fairly substantial falls (42 and 55 percent, respectively). Meanwhile, Jason Reitman’s Young Adult expanded to 986 theaters but only mustered $3.65 million, which suggests a course closer to Thank You for Smoking than Juno or Up in the Air. That saddens me, not because I liked Young Adult (my opinion tracked that of Dan’s) but because I always picture Jason Reitman as looking like Jason Ritter, and I love Jason Ritter, and I always want Jason Ritter to do well. But then I look up Jason Reitman and remember what he looks like, and I don’t feel as bad, although I still think Reitman is a profoundly amazing director.

At any rate, the top movie this week, Sherlock Holmes: Game of Shadows is a historical fiction film, which gives me the opportunity to run down the 20 highest grossing historical fiction movies of all time. These numbers are adjusted for inflation, which allows us to see titles we do not typically see among the usual box-office record holders. It’s also neat to see how certain more recent movies fare in an inflation adjusted list with some of the classics. For instance, I’d have expected the first Sherlock Holmes to break the top 20, but I’d never have thought that Robin Hood Prince of Thieves would. Yet, based on the inflation adjusted numbers, nearly three times more people must have seen Kevin Costner’s film than Sherlock Holmes, which is a strange thing to consider, though I’ll concede that my teenage self kind of loved Prince of Thieves. Clearly, Sherlock needed more Bryan Adams.

The 20 Highest Grossing Historical Fiction Movies of All Time

20. Platoon: $293 million

19. Casablanca: $303 million

18. Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves: $309 million

17. Dances with Wolves: $328 million

16. Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull: $348 million

15. Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End: $354 million

14. The Caine Mutiny: $384 million

13. Fiddler on the Roof: $384 million

12. Indiana Jones and the Temple Doom: $411 million

11. How the West Was Won: $431 million

10. The Passion of the Christ: $471 million

9. Notorious (1946): $478 million

8. Grease: $564 million

7. Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid: $568 million

6. My Fair Lady: $610 million

5. Forrest Gump: $633 million

4. The Sting: $711 million

3. Doctor Zhivago: $872 million

2. Titanic: $1.06 billion

1. Sound of Music: $1.275 billion

(Source: The Numbers)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Ten Movies You'd Never, Ever Want to Watch with Your Parents | It's Hard To Think Of A Less Appealing Title Than 'Salmon Fishing In The Yemen,' But Here We Are









Comments

Is Casablanca really historical fiction? Production began in January '42, and it's set in December '41. Is a month considered a big enough gap for a movie to be historical?

Posted by: james at December 19, 2011 12:03 AM

Hold on a second I think I'm reading one wrong, does #8 actually say GREASE?

Posted by: Holly at December 19, 2011 12:12 AM

I need an operational definition of 'historical fiction' plz.

Posted by: LBeees at December 19, 2011 12:39 AM

Hey,everone,give you an exciting site --Seekcasual.C .ó.M---
Pls check it out.I think you will like it.
Thank you very much.

Posted by: kengao46 at December 19, 2011 12:48 AM

Where the hell is Gone with the Wind?

Posted by: Melody Be at December 19, 2011 12:55 AM

Yeh think Gone with the wind is historical fiction under any definition. Just checked Saving Private Ryan on boxoffice mojo and unadjusted it made 481m putting it at 7 (although I suppose higher if it was adjusted) and if Platoon is included I don't see how that is not.

Also doesn't pirates at worlds end have something with the pirate ships spiralling down into another dimension or something (refused to watch that movie more than once)

Posted by: Jimmdodd at December 19, 2011 2:24 AM

There is entirely too much Kevin Costner on this list.

1939 dollars must be teeny tiny if Gone With The Wind isn't up here.

Posted by: Jerry at December 19, 2011 3:44 AM

Yeah, there are definitely some glaring oddities on the list, as well as some genuinely great movies. As others have mentioned, surely there's some confusion as to what constitutes "historical fiction". Also confusing is Rowles assertion that Sherlock Holmes needed more Bryan Adams. As a Canadian who was a teenager when Adams broke big, let me assure you, what the world needs now, is less Bryan Adams.

Posted by: Groundloop at December 19, 2011 8:28 AM

Where is "Star Wars"? The movie takes place a long time ago, given the parameters of this list I think it qualifies.

Posted by: TylerDFC at December 19, 2011 8:42 AM

I'm not sure how Casablanca and Notorious qualify for this list. I suppose they qualify NOW but 'historical fiction' wasn't the original intent of either film.

Posted by: sunny at December 19, 2011 9:43 AM

I need an operational definition of 'historical fiction' plz.

The Numbers doesn't appear to have any definition.

If The Passion of the Christ ($471 million) is there, we might as well as add:
The Ten Commandments ($1.042 billion)
Ben-Hur ($780 million)
Cleopatra ($535 million)

Blazing Saddles ($503 million) would be fine as well.

Posted by: Jast at December 19, 2011 10:08 AM

I think by definition, almost ALL FILMS are historical fiction. For starters, they are all fiction, even if they claim to be a true story. And if they are set today, and filmed today, by the time they are released a few months have gone by (Casablanca, cough, cough). And even if they are set in the future, they either pretend to be set in the past (Star Wars) or look super dated by the time you draw up a list like this.

I think in order to qualify as historical fiction, the following rules need to apply:

1. The timeframe of the movie is 20 years or more before the movie is filmed.

2. Actual historical events have to take place. The movie can't just be set in previous decade. It has to be about something that actually happened.

Posted by: BWeaves at December 19, 2011 10:29 AM

Um, how is Grease historical fiction? Just because something is set in a different decade than the present doesn't make it historical fiction.

Posted by: KatSings at December 19, 2011 10:46 AM

I have to agree that the definition of "historical fiction" is far too loose. Typically for it to be historical fiction it needs to be a fictional story that is framed by actual events. A person, a war, a movement, etc. Crystal Skull and a Pirates of the Caribbean movie should hardly classify as historical fiction.

Posted by: Some Guy at December 19, 2011 11:39 AM

I dunno, the only reason I ever saw the first Sherlock Holmes was because it was the only not-awful thing playing in the theater in Galveston when we were on vacation there and had nothing better to do. This one I'm even less interested in watching. It probably would've done better if it had opened closer to Christmas, too.

Posted by: figgy at December 19, 2011 11:43 AM

Grease is historical fiction because it dramatizes the invention of mooning.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at December 19, 2011 11:55 AM

WTF? Indiana Jones is considered "Historical Fiction"? So how is "Gone with the Wind" not on the list? It is one of the highest grossing movies of all time!

Posted by: Bumboclot at December 19, 2011 12:32 PM

I feel like DR is trolling his audience with this post. There is a difference between "fiction" and "historical fiction".

Posted by: Sara Tonin at December 19, 2011 1:03 PM

This one I'm even less interested in watching. It probably would've done better if it had opened closer to Christmas, too.

There's no way it would've done better than this with a closer to Christmas opening. That "the competition wasn’t particularly fierce (though, it will be next weekend)" that Dustin alluded to?

The Adventures of Tintin, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, and We Bought a Zoo all go very wide release this week AND Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol expands out to non-IMAX theaters nationwide as well.

Even films that people have forgotten about for the last four months or more (War Horse, directed by Steven Spielberg and starring Tom Hiddleston, Benedict Cumberbatch, and Emily Watson making Spielberg faces! and The Darkest Hour) are each going wide release on Christmas day.

Basically, it's going to be a Christmas box office bloodbath. Speaking of which, time to go rewatch Santa's Slay!

Posted by: Jast at December 19, 2011 1:18 PM

Oh, well that makes sense. It'll be completely forgotten in a week. I think RDJ might not be as much of a box-office draw as some people think he is.

Posted by: figgy at December 19, 2011 1:37 PM

There is a lot of people that claim lord of the rings is set in our distant past.

Crazy nerdy virgininal stupid morons, but people too

Posted by: Jimmdodd at December 19, 2011 2:36 PM

Where's Gone With the Wind? FAIL!

Posted by: Raquel at December 19, 2011 5:28 PM

This is the stupidest list I have ever seen. If those 2 Indy films are on here, how is Raiders of the Lost Ark not on the list. Pretty sure it made more money than either of its sequels. How is Grease historical fiction? Argh! My brain wants to explode.

Posted by: Terry at December 19, 2011 8:17 PM