web
counter
 

10 Family Movies that Opened Better than The Muppets and Therefore Make Me Question America's Sanity

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Box Office Round-Ups | Comments (18)



473px-TheMuppets-Behind-The-Scenes-Interviews-MissPoogy.jpg

The Muppet movie debuted this weekend with $29.5 million ($42 million since Wednesday) and while it’s admittedly tempting to applaud a solid box-office performance of a long-dormant franchise, given just how amazingly good the movie is, it feels disappointing particularly given the advantage of a huge Thanksgiving weekend. You can’t blame the movie (it’s outstanding), nor the marketing (it was pervasive), so the only thing left to blame is the viewing public, who showed up in larger numbers on opening weekend to see these ten films.

Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa: $63 million

How the Grinch Stole Christmas: $55 million

Scooby Doo: $54 million

Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel: $48 million

Shark Tale: $47 million

Alvin and the Chipmunks: $44 million

The Nutty Professor II: The Klumps: $42 million

Hop: $37 million

Marley and Me: $36 million

G-Force: $31 million

So, talking hamsters, a dead dog, a bunny that shits jelly beans, singing chipmunks, and the bastardization of a celebrated Dr. Seuss book out-grossed the magical, marvelous, enchanting heartfelt Muppets. Congratulations, America. You never fail to let me down.

And oh yeah: Twilight Breaking Dawn Part I continued to pile up beaucoups of cash, adding $41 million over the three day weekend to bring its total to $220 million after 10 days. I don’t know what the record for the biggest differential between box-office gross and action level is, but Breaking Dawn Part I has to be in the top five, along with the Da Vinci Code films.

Meanwhile, Happy Feet Two stuck around with a disappointing $13 million in its second weekend; it probably won’t break $70 million domestic, which is a huge blow to the film. I don’t know what it cost, but the first one cost $100 million, so this is obviously hard to swallow for Warner Brothers animation. Given the popularity of the first one, and the fact that this one was even more family friendly, I’m a little beffudled why it performed so poorly unless it was just the intense competition among family films during this time of the year. In fourth place, Arthur Christmas also put up only $12.7 million ($17 million since Wednesday), another disappointing tally, though it should have some legs as the only true Christmas film of the season.

In at number five, Martin Scorsese’s delightful, enchanting Hugo managed only $11.3 million. After seeing the film last night, I completely understand Joanna’s concerns about who the film was targeted toward: It was a kid’s film that most kids would’ve been bored with while most adults would’ve avoided it because it’s a kids film. About film history. So, basically, it’s a film for movie critics and cinephiles. Actually, given those factors, $11.3 million is impressive.

Hugo did have a solid per screen average of $8,800, which is better than My Week with Marilyn, which had a $7,700 per screen average on 1000 fewer theaters. It did not compare, however, to the whopping $52,000 per screen average of The Artist (on four screens) or the $45,000 per screen average of A Dangerous Method (also on four screens). Both films are set up for Oscar runs.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



First Look: Maura Tierney as Robert California's Wife in "The Office" | V for Vendetta by Alan Moore









Comments

I saw the muppet movie and the turnout for the theatre was mainly 30 somethings and above. I guess the theme of the movie played out in real life.

Posted by: Roland at November 28, 2011 12:05 AM

Some people just don't care about the Muppets that much, dude. Sad truth, but there it is.

Posted by: figgy at November 28, 2011 12:18 AM

The Muppet Movie was fantastic and this depresses me. Especially seeing most of the previews before the film which depressed me more. Only Brave really looked good and maybe the Pirates movie by the Wallace and Grommit people.

Posted by: Alyson at November 28, 2011 1:39 AM

I wonder, 3 years now into the ongoing clusterfuck of this economy, if we're seeing the squeeze on young families in these numbers. As in, we're finally running out of money/credit, or the economy has finally caught up with us. Prices for food staples have been steadily rising. Gas didn't make a huge jump, but it's been sky-high for the entire recession. Most news articles I've scanned are quoting a 10-16% jump in prices since last holiday season.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at November 28, 2011 5:15 AM

As the late, great Carlin used to say:

'The public sucks. Fuck hope.'

Posted by: zeke the pig at November 28, 2011 5:15 AM

Stop trying to make this flick happen, Rowles.

They should have called it: The Great Muppet Flop

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 28, 2011 5:27 AM

I wonder if the holiday really helped it. I fully intend to take my kids to see it, but this weekend was about spending time with family, and there just wasn't time to sneak off. We'll see it this week.

Posted by: McSquish at November 28, 2011 7:13 AM

My sisters recently went the movies (they're 15 and 17), and were going to go see *gag* Jack and Jill. I managed to sway one sister and her friend into seeing the Muppets...but I failed the other sister. She still saw Jack and Jill.

But the one who watched the Muppets thoroughly enjoyed it. SO I don't understand why their first instinct is to pay and sit through an extremely shitty movie.

And they've only recently realized how awful Twilight is...but I think it's just because of how much I exclaim how shit it is.

Posted by: Candee at November 28, 2011 7:22 AM

I think maybe we need to finally cast a critical eye on the Muppet Movie and admit that:

1) it was mediocre.

2) the dude from How I Met Your Mother doesn't have the range or appeal to do much more than sitcoms that appeal to suburbanites who wish they lived in NY.

Posted by: Joe at November 28, 2011 7:37 AM

I totally want to take my kids to see the MM, but we just couldn't afford a movie and a Thanksgiving dinner.

Posted by: Agogagogo at November 28, 2011 7:54 AM

Et tu, Slim?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 28, 2011 9:37 AM

Slim doesn't speak Spanish.

Posted by: admin at November 28, 2011 10:07 AM

I saw it yesterday afternoon.
The theater was packed, which surprised me.
I thought it was sweet, but it made me long for Jim Henson.

Posted by: Gemma at November 28, 2011 10:23 AM

They're going to have to rebuild their fanbase in the younger generations. I'm not saying that they need to pull a stunt like the awful Muppets Tonight fiasco, but reopening the Muppet Theater and putting on a show once a week. If they could recapture the spirit of the original show, I know my nieces would put down their Elmos and start begging to have knives like the Swedish Chef.
Er, I wouldn't give them knives, but I'd certainly teach them how to say, "Bork! Bork! Bork!"

Posted by: Bob Frapples at November 28, 2011 11:11 AM

We enjoyed the movie, but all of those voices (even the now 20 year old Whitmire Kermit) kept bringing me out of the movie just a bit and I hated that. Everything makes me long for Jim Henson, Gemma. And I hate this keyboard I’m typing on cause it should be Jim Henson. I hate this desk under my keyboard because it isn’t Jim Henson. I even hate this post because it’s not the whole truth because the whole truth is so much more than saying I miss Jim Henson can even say.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 28, 2011 11:18 AM

Mrs. Julien, for heaven's sake, stop talking about how much you miss Jim Henson!

God, do I miss Jim Henson.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at November 28, 2011 12:24 PM

Can I just say that I loved Hop. My 3 year old nephew watches it every day.. and uh...I kind of watch it with him : /

Posted by: Gemma at November 28, 2011 12:28 PM

Seriously? That stupid Alvin and the Chipmunks movie did better? :-(

Posted by: filmigeek at November 29, 2011 9:31 AM