free counter with statistics Drood by Dan Simmons | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

n271760.jpg
Charles Dickens and the Man with No Scalp


Drood by Dan Simmons / Jennifer McKeown

Book Reviews | June 17, 2009 | Comments (10)


Let me get something out of the way. Drood is long. REALLY long. The narrator has a tendency to ramble, and many think the story would benefit from losing a few hundred pages. I couldn’t disagree more. I loved every bit of this big behemoth.

For those unfamiliar with Dan Simmons, he is perhaps best known for The Terror, which recounts the doomed 1845 expedition to find the Northwest Passage. (Quick sidenote: I can’t recommend The Terror enough. The Terror is downright amazing and utterly impossible to put down. Simmons’ meticulous research is clear, and while he injects a supernatural element to the tale, I was equally fascinated by the life of the crew as they fought to survive while frozen in the pack ice for three years.)

As soon as I learned of his latest novel, Drood, I knew I was in for a similar treat. This time, Simmons turns his well-researched eye to those famous frenemies, Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins. Mr. Billy Wilkie Collins (author of The Woman in White and The Moonstone) is our esteemed narrator, and a more entertaining narrator — if not a more reliable one — couldn’t be found. Unfortunately for Collins, he suffers from a variety of ailments, not the least of them being his addiction to opium.

Just as in The Terror, Drood centers on a real-life event that Simmons then meticulously explores, adding a supernatural twist along the way. The event in question is the Staplehurst rail crash of June 1865, which Dickens survived. On this day, the first seven carriages of the Staplehurst train plunged off a bridge — only the carriage in which Dickens was riding was safe. Dickens, who aided the wounded and dying immediately after the accident, was never the same and would suffer debilitating anxiety attacks as a result of witnessing such suffering. In Drood, Simmons describes how “Dickens watched a man stagger towards him, arms outstretched as if for a welcoming hug. The top of the man’s skull had been torn off rather the way one would crack an eggshell with a spoon in preparation for breakfast.”

Simmons uses the Staplehurst accident as the backbone of Drood, injecting the spectral figure of Drood himself into the wreckage of the crash. Who — or what — is this Drood? What does he want? I could tell you, Dear Reader, but you’ll have much more fun if you find out for yourself.

Intertwined with the ghastly Drood who first appears to Dickens during the Staplehurst carnage is The Mystery of Edwin Drood, Dickens final (and unfinished) novel. In Simmons’ world, much of Edwin Drood is influenced by the aftershocks of the Staplehurst crash. Dickens and Collins, seeking to understand the true nature of Drood, descend into the depths of London, combing the sewers and catacombs beneath the city. Of course, they find much more than they bargained for, as a subterranean world of both natural and supernatural horrors await them. But which horrors are real, and which are imagined? Which are the product of Collins’ opium delirium? How many affected by memory? (Collins narrates these events many years after they’ve happened.) Simmons forces his readers to consider what is real and what is illusion just as he entertains them with thrills and chills galore.

Much like the underground explored by Dickens and Collins, the plot of Drood is labyrinthine and multi-layered. As in The Terror, Simmons has clearly researched his subjects, and this research shows in every scene. While some found such information heavy and unnecessary, I found this information captivating and enjoyed these digressions.

Still, I acknowledge that Collins can be a frustrating narrator at times, even if I found him entertaining. He exaggerates, he digresses, he repeats himself, he recounts information that is not necessary to the matter at hand. Despite these qualities, I finished the 784th page feeling as though I’d only read half that amount. While many scenes may not be necessary to understanding the mystery that is Drood, I found every single page worth reading. is an unforgettable, spellbinding experience.

Jennifer McKeown reads way too much and blogs about her experiences over at Bibliolatry.


I Just Googled Myself | Whiteout Trailer



Comments

Is this the same Dan Simmons who wrote Hyperion and other amazingly good sci-fi novels? And he has a new book out? And I didn't hear about it?

Well now I know what my next Amazon order is going to include, along with the amazing vibrating Harry Potter wonder broom.

Posted by: Neodiogenes at June 17, 2009 9:28 AM

Excellent review! I've been interested in this one since I first heard about it, I'll efinitely check it out now. "The Terror" is on my list to read shortly. I own the book, but haven't given it more than a cursory glance as it's still about 3 books deep on the "pile". Incidentally, I plan to re-read Dan Simmon's first book "Song of Kali" after I finish my current book. If you haven't read "Song of Kali" I highly recommend it. Concerns a journalist investigating a Kali cult in India. Very dark subject matter and very creepy yet atmospheric story.

Posted by: TylerDFC at June 17, 2009 9:30 AM

I would posit that he's more well known for the amazing Hyperion novels than The Terror (which is, indeed, a phenomenal book), but then again... maybe that's just among sci fi nerds like me.

That said, crackling review! I'm buying this today.

Posted by: TK at June 17, 2009 9:37 AM

Add "Summer of Night" to large, must-read Simmons novels. Sort of an "It" redo, and ideal vacation readin'.

Posted by: Natural 20 at June 17, 2009 9:44 AM

Yes, same Dan Simmons. Illium and Olympos were at times long and meandering as well. Simmons is showing an increasing dearth of editor control for each book he writes.

I'm not as enthusiastic about his horror work because his writing is so good that the horror becomes unbearably uncomfortable. Even his other genre stuff is bloody & violent, but it feels right in that context.

I'm still trying to understand his essay from 2006, http://www.dansimmons.com/news/message/2006_04.htm, when he went all neo-con crazy. I'm not sure if it's serious or if he did a teeth-aching twist on right-wing fantasy wrapped with his own penchant for blood and pain.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at June 17, 2009 9:53 AM

I agree with idiosynchronic: Simmons needs a good editor. I think Drood could have been a much more riveting book without those 'few hundred (extraneous) pages'.

Posted by: Ken at June 17, 2009 12:32 PM

I'm not sure I am too bothered by the length and rambling. I expect stories of this genre and set in this time to read as if they were serialized and drawn out. I absolutely love Dickens and really don't care for Collins so this one will be interesting. I also can never get enough of stories set in London's underground sewers and forgotten rivers (I think there are 7 underground rivers in London?). Long way of saying, count me in.

Posted by: PaddyDog at June 17, 2009 1:57 PM

For those interested, A Winter Haunting is Simmons' sequel to Summer of Night, and it's fabulous, as well. I've also read Hardcase, his foray into the two-fisted PI genre, and it's obvious that this guy can flat out write his ass off, irrespective of genre.

I hate him a little bit for that.

Posted by: boscobarbell at June 17, 2009 2:52 PM

In Drood, Simmons describes how “Dickens watched a man stagger towards him, arms outstretched as if for a welcoming hug
I knew it! Dickens couldn't finish Drood because of ZOMBIES!!!!

Posted by: Odnon at June 17, 2009 4:16 PM

Ooh now I want to check out The Terror and Hyperion. Maybe not Drood, at least not at first, since I'm not a big Dickens fans. And definitely not The Terror until Cannonball Read is over-1,000 pages? Christ, man.

Posted by: SaBrina at June 17, 2009 8:17 PM