web
counter
 

"Up All Night" Review: Applegate and Arnett are Great; Rudolph Takes Another Sh*t in the Street

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (23)



up-all-night-nbc-tv-show.jpg

Is there a rule of thumb when judging a comedy based on its pilot? We know that three of the best sitcoms on television right now had middling to bad pilots: “Parks and Recreation” (middling, same for the entire first season); “30 Rock” (middling, at best, and it didn’t find its legs until midway through the first season) and “The Office” (awful, but it began to turn it around as soon as the second episode). One of the few great pilots for currently running sitcoms was “Modern Family” and it managed to hang on to its solid sense of humor for a season and a half before it began to show signs of fatigue.

In terms of quality, “Up All Night” lands somewhere between the “30 Rock” and the “Modern Family” pilots: Good, but not great. But I think it’s going to succeed ultimately on the basis of the talent involved, a generic premise with a lot of wiggle room, and a creator/writer in Emily Spivey who came from “Saturday Night Live” and “Parks and Recreation” and — as a career-first woman who had children late — obviously knows the terrain.

Christina Applegate and Will Arnett (minus the arrogant boisterousness) star as Reagan and Chris, late 30s parents with high-pressure careers who are used to lives of so many married without children parents I know: Long hours, a carefree existence with a lot of vacations and alcohol, and ample disposable income. Applegate and Arnett nail that aspect of the show from the beginning. Like so many older parents who have eschewed kids and gently mocked the troubles of their child-rearing friends, they’re bewildered by how “f*%king beautiful” an infant can be, as well as the daily shock of having to rearrange their lives around the pooping blob that’s taken up residence in their home. There is a scene midway through the pilot that most new parents can readily identify with: The battle of who slept less, where Reagan and Chris argue about who had the least amount of sleep and who thus should have to tend to the baby (an ongoing argument in my house four years in). And there’s yet another identifiable moment where Chris is celebrating the fact that he found a similarly situated Dad and the slow friend courtship that ensues.

It’s the new parent moments where “Up All Night” is at its strongest, particularly in the the parenting insecurities and the daily quibbles and resentments that Chris — who quit his job in a law firm — has with Reagan, who maintained her high-powered position in entertainment. Arnett suits that role perfectly; he’s a neutered version of his “Arrested Development” character, and like a lot of Dads in that situation, feels emasculated by the stay-at-home Dad part, even if it’s one he chose for himself.

The other half of “Up All Night” — mom’s workplace difficulties— hasn’t yet gelled with the parenting half. It’s uneven, and aims more for sitcom yuks than it does identifiable humor. Reagan plays the close friend and assistant to Maya Rudolph’s Ava, a demanding and oblivious “Oprah-esque” talk show host who wants to pretend as though becoming a mother hasn’t changed Reagan’s life. In the pilot episode, Spivey relies too much on Rudolph’s “SNL” shtick — singing voices and diva-like caricatures — and less on the strengths of Rudolph: Her abilities as the droll straight-man as demonstrated in Bridesmaids and Away We Go. Some of the unevenness might be attributed to the late decision to beef up Maya Rudolph’s role (and change her job) in the wake of the successful Bridesmaids, so there’s reason to hope that Ava will eventually become a more sympathetic friend instead of an “SNL” skit that loses its momentum halfway through.

It’s definitely a comedy that displays a lot of potential. Applegate has bounced around since “Married with … Children” as the sole strength in a series of mediocre to bad sitcoms, and “Up All Night” is easily the best television role she’s had since Kelly Bundy. Save for a recurring role on “30 Rock,” Arnett has been television poison since “Arrested Development” ended its run, but in “Up All Night” he finally gets to play a character with whom we can identify and relate instead of an obnoxious loudmouth. Maya Rudolph is likewise a brilliant actress too often misused. If Spivey can do for her character they did with Amy Poehler’s in “Parks and Recreation” — make her someone to root for instead of someone to laugh at — then it’s very possible that “Up All Night” will settle into one of the stronger sitcoms on network television.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Throw Me The Idol, I'll Throw You The Whip: Why Spielberg > Lucas | Sarah Michelle Gellar's "Ringer" is as Vacant as Her Eyes









Comments

I agree with all of this review, Dustin. Maya may have botched the supporting friend role but my oh my does she nail the diva talk show hostess role to the wall. "Cleanse! We're doing a cleanse people! Office cleanse! Office cleanse!" Yeah, that sort of stuff actually does happen. Shiver.

Posted by: JenVegas at September 15, 2011 11:46 AM

This review was spot-on. I really wanted to enjoy this show, but found it a bit "meh". I am definitely hoping that as the season moves on (provided it survives) they settle into a better groove, as last night felt disjointed. There were definitely parts I laughed at, but other parts meant to be funny that fell flat.
I hope it gets better, b/c I'd love to see all 3 lead actors succeed in prime time. I love Christina Applegate.

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at September 15, 2011 12:08 PM

As a new mom on mat leave, I wanted to like the show. Instead I couldn't get over how much it totally emasculates Will Arnett.

To be fair, I only caught the last half of the show but at the end when Christina Applegate is talking about the baby visiting her at the nursing home, Arnett isn't even in the picture anymore..."Daddy will be dead by then". Really? How's that supposed to make Daddy feel??

I despise tv shows that reduce dads to punchlines or worse, devalue their contributions. If this show continues along this vein, I won't be tuning in.

CU

Posted by: Cinderella Undercover at September 15, 2011 12:12 PM

I enjoyed the pilot and love the stars. I also laughed boisterously at Nick Cannon's little cameo as Ava's obnoxious on-air sidekick.

For me, the challenge will lie in maintaining my interest in a subject I couldn't give less of a shit about: new parents and their baby drama. As a child-free thirty-something, I am the polar opposite of the demographic that this show is trying to reach.

I love the babies-as-side-characters in shows like Raising Hope and Modern Family, but if they make the baby the focus, then I'm afraid I am out.

Posted by: Skyler Durden at September 15, 2011 12:17 PM

I love the babies-as-side-characters in shows like Raising Hope and Modern Family, but if they make the baby the focus, then I'm afraid I am out.

This is what I find bizarre about this show. It's centered around raising a baby. I mean, that's the premise, at least. Kids fucking grow up. What's the show gonna be like when the kid goes to preschool? Ah, they'll just run it into the ground like every other television comedy.

Any of you ever heard someone say something like, "Yeah, my car's a piece of shit, but it's paid for. I'll just drive it til the wheels fall off."? That's how I feel about most television.

Posted by: pissant at September 15, 2011 12:23 PM

Uh, that pilot was absolute shit. And not in a good way. Not a laugh to be had. Cancelled by the end of the month bad.

Posted by: seth at September 15, 2011 12:29 PM

I was a fan. Good news for other fans, the premiere got excellent ratings. It was helped by the America's Got Talent finale lead in but there were something like 10.9 million people who stuck around.

Posted by: the chaplain at September 15, 2011 1:31 PM

As people who are/were in the exact situation, my husband & I found ourselves chuckling at a lot of the moments in the show. I went back to work, he chose to stay home, and our lives looked a lot like that. A lot.

The kid is now in preschool, the husband is now back to work, and I think our lives are even more comical than when the boy was teeny. Just in different ways.

But, I am the target market, I suppose.

Posted by: Captain Tuttle at September 15, 2011 1:32 PM

Apparently I like the phrase "a lot" a lot. Der.

Posted by: Captain Tuttle at September 15, 2011 1:34 PM

The show was laughless and Mya Rudolph is just not funny... EVER. Still it's always hard to judge a show by it's pilot which is why I stuck with Will Arnett's last horrible show for 5 awful episodes.

Posted by: bob at September 15, 2011 2:17 PM

I didn't watch the show, and probably won't, but I love Christina Applegate for unquantifiable reasons and I want her to succeed.

Posted by: MM at September 15, 2011 3:05 PM

I think this show had promise. I mean, at least the pilot didn't have a "dads/husbands are so incompetent at life" plotline, so I'm game to give this show a shot. And who knew Applegate and Arnett had good chemistry?

Posted by: kelsy at September 15, 2011 4:09 PM

I thought it was promising, but not great. My favorite part was the "normal cheese" discussion. But yeah, if Maya Rudolph's character stays like it is in the pilot, Applegate and Arnett are not going to be enough to keep me watching.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at September 15, 2011 4:18 PM

I'm glad to hear that this might be watchable because I'm committed to watching EVERYTHING Will Arnett is in for as long as it lasts.

Posted by: Jelinas at September 15, 2011 5:15 PM

Looking forward to catching this online tonight.

As for the 'who slept less' argument, my husband actually bought us Fitbit devices so we could clearly measure who was getting less sleep (noted by how many times we were active during the night). We felt a little silly when we realized that we were about even in our sleep deprivation. But it was very important to find this out!

Posted by: katy at September 15, 2011 5:26 PM

my husband and i LOVE Will Arnett. And I have been sooo looking forward to this show. I was so happy it was good!I couldn't care less about the job plot though. Honestly I would take Arnett fumbling with the baby all day and would tune in weekly.

Posted by: blacksred at September 15, 2011 7:20 PM

Kelsy nailed it. The thing I was happiest about was that Arnett's character was not a bumbling idiot. He's actually just a good dad, and a man who had a good career and chose to be the stay at home parent. The trailers for other new shows display a trend of "ha HA, men are such idiots! Right?!" but that isn't the case here. Arnett will still play videogames, sure, but only after he's tended to his daughter and gotten her to sleep successfully and without incident.

My overall impression was exactly the same. Loved all the Arnett/Applegate stuff, but the workplace Rudolph stuff was hit or miss, and generally too disjointed from the main story.

Definitely enough promise to keep me tuning in. As Dustin noted, a lot of the best comedies take a little while to find their footing, and after the pilot, I'm more than willing to give this one that time.

Posted by: Steve at September 16, 2011 12:56 AM

The show definitely has potential... (Frankly, I'd watch for Christina Applegate alone.) I have to agree with Skyler Durden though: as a 24-year-old single guy, I'll only care about all the "wow, our baby's beautiful, but wow, it also poops and cries" stuff to a certain point. For now it's fine, but I hope they don't run it into the ground.

I'll be sure to tune in next time.

Posted by: Thijs at September 16, 2011 6:59 AM

So i decided to write about this show... WOW completely horrible what the hell was up with that show.
It was not funny at all, the bleeping was so annoying, the acting was as if they where movie stars in a B rated movie.
I am not sure how people found the story line amazing. This show really needs to go off the air and make room for something better.
Also I am a real parent as well and sure it is similar to real life but it is still crap.

Posted by: mike at September 17, 2011 10:09 AM

Married-without-children-parents aren't parents.

Posted by: AM at September 17, 2011 5:07 PM

I have twins myself (10 months) and my husband is a stay at homer (he's a student) and I work, so they've got the hooks in for now.

On another note: babes eat the same thing all the time, how is each poop so different!? POOOOOOPS!

Posted by: Salad_Is_Murder at September 18, 2011 4:58 AM

Wait, Christina Applegate is a professional woman who is also raising a child? HOW DOES SHE DO IT?

Posted by: Markus at September 20, 2011 1:41 PM

Hi, I think your site might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your website in Safari, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, fantastic blog!

Posted by: Bed Bath and Beyond Coupons at October 27, 2011 10:42 PM