ufo-hunters-2.jpg
Calling Occupants Of Interplanetary Craft


Pajiba's Trash TV: "UFO Hunters" / Michael Murray

TV Reviews | May 22, 2009 | Comments (22)


When I think of people who profess absolute certainty that there’s no extraterrestrial life in the universe, I think of Lobsters. I imagine one somewhere in the pitch, black depths off the coast of Alaska, going about his Lobster life. Given the opportunity, could that entity conceive of a massive terrestrial civilization of human beings that inhabited the very same planet as it did? I’m thinking that it couldn’t. And so, when I ponder the possibility of life in outer space, I think of the lobster, realizing full well that in the universal scheme, I’m a Lobster, too, and whatever exists out there is entirely beyond the powers of my imagination, perception and reason.

As such, I’ve always been entirely fascinated by those people who make it their life’s mission to discover mortal proof of flying saucers and anal-probing aliens. Any show that has UFO in the title is catnip to me, and I will watch it without hesitation. One such program is the History Channel’s “UFO Hunters.”

It’s a documentary series in which a team, led by Bill Birnes, publisher of UFO magazine, investigates cases of unidentified aerial phenomena. Birnes, probably somewhere in his mid-60s, is almost always seen wearing aviator sunglasses and a baseball hat, as if trying to conceal his identity from those who would want him eliminated. He’s also usually sporting some sort of bomber jacket, which seems to be the preferred look of many men that age who hope to project the vigorous look of a retired top gun pilot.

The other members of the team are Pat Uskert, who knows how to scuba dive, and Kevin Cook, who is skeptical. Together, the three men travel the world, interviewing UFO witnesses, compiling and analyzing evidence, and conducting their own peculiar brand of research.

A recent episode investigated an American military base located near the Bermuda Triangle, called AUTEC, a center for underwater research, which the crew ominously refers to as the Navy’s Area 51. Mysterious, alien activity is reputed to be taking place there.

The show starts with a bombardment of technical information, as the investigators reel off dates and statistics with an impressive and scholarly confidence. This creates the appearance of some sort of intellectual rigor, without actually clarifying anything they’re talking about. It’s a sort of sophistry, I guess, a distracting suggestion of science rather than the presentation of science. You know, the sort of thing any one of us would have done when asked a question in grade ten Biology class.

We then charge into the interview portion, in which Bill, who agrees with absolutely anything that a witness has to say, nods his head vigorously, regardless of what he’s being told. In the breathless, tell-me-more fashion of Sycophants, the “UFO Hunters” ask leading questions that are actually encouragements instead of sober minded inquiry.

After interviewing a motley crew of outsiders who claim to have seen three-fingered spacemen and flying ships the size of continents, the UFO Hunters decide to infiltrate the military base.

Led by Bill, who was shouting, “Show us the ET!” the three men walked toward the gated entrance to the AUTEC facility. As they do this, there’s a quick cut to a helicopter cutting aimlessly across the sky. The hunters huddle together and declare that they are under intense surveillance and are in peril, and then beat a hasty retreat. The connection between their assault on AUTEC and the helicopter was spurious at best, and there was no more evidence to suggest that they were being monitored by government than they were by the Seagull picking through some nearby garbage. No matter, their florid and self-aggrandizing paranoia was dramatic, suggesting omnipotent agencies and grand conspiracies.

The next step was to investigate the facility by water, and so they hopped in a boat. Proudly informing us that they were going to encounter sharks, Pat, who in spite of his mechanical engineering degree, seems like a bit of dumb blonde, dives into the water. He finds a cable, which they conclude could be the key to the entire mystery.

Standing alone at the end of a pier, the UFO Hunters meet an improbably named Frenchman who’s wearing a double-breasted jacket and tie. Looking a bit like Michael Douglas, he boasts the long, thinning hair of decaying aristocracy and tells us that AUTEC is a built on top of the lost civilization of Atlantis and that it is a portal to multiple universes, before whispering that he cannot reveal his sources, because if he did so, he would be killed. Bill nods vigorously, in complete agreement with everything he has uttered.

Kevin, as is his wont, remains skeptical, insisting on further proof, and so we head off to meet Bruce, who wears a floppy, yellow hat and claims to be a pilot who has traveled in time. Honestly, this man, who spoke slowly and had a childish grin sliding all over his face, struck me as somebody who had suffered severe head trauma.

The UFO Hunters, making truly insane leaps of logic and connectivity, stitch together a phantasmagoric tapestry of conspiracy, with Bill, at the end of the show, declaring that they have “conclusively shown that the US military could possibly be working with aliens.”

Well, thanks for that, Bill.

“UFO Hunters” is really just a piece of fiction scripted for children and zealots. It’s kind of fun and campy the first time you see it, but by the second time, the obsessive manipulations and evident delusions of the crew begin to feel more like mental illness than the spirited efforts of inquiring minds. And now, after three seasons of tilting at windmills, “UFO Hunters” is coming to an end on Wednesday, when on their final episode, they investigate the phenomena of orbs, or as many of us call them, the spots we see after staring at the sun too long.

Michael Murray is a freelance writer. For the last three and a half years he’s written a weekly column for the Ottawa Citizen about watching television. He presently lives in Toronto. You can find more of his musings on his blog, or check out his Facebook page.


9 Trailer | A Movie for Every Holiday







Comments

I've never heard of this show. It got 3 seasons? Really? And Firefly was canned halfway through it's first?

Posted by: BWeaves at May 22, 2009 11:25 AM

I'm 100% sure somewhere in the universe there is intelligent life. Whether or not it has an unhealthy obsession wtih proctology and mutilating cattle is a completely different question. This show sounds hilarious.

Posted by: TylerDFC at May 22, 2009 11:47 AM

There is no justice, BWeaves.

Posted by: Uncle JR at May 22, 2009 11:49 AM

So this is like Coast To Coast AM, but on the tv?
History channel is starting to turn into SciFi (or whatever its called now.)

Posted by: Grov505th at May 22, 2009 11:52 AM

A very excellent description of this dumb-ass show.
Can you now take a scalpel to "Ghost Hunters" and "Monster Quest" ?
Those dim-bulbs never ever find a damn thing and never will. Who puts up money for making this crap?

Posted by: dirt monkey at May 22, 2009 12:10 PM

Actually, when I think of "lobster" I think "alien." I mean, look at the thing. It's the best evidence, I think, that we've been visited from Out There. It was a very brave or very hungry or very crazy or all three motherfucker who first looked at a lobster and thought, "Food."

King crab, too.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at May 22, 2009 12:31 PM

I always love these series searching for monsters and phenomena that take the cameras out as if they're going to find something. I mean, how clever do you have to be to determine that if they had found something, you would have heard about it long before they could edit it together into a TV show?

Posted by: Eep at May 22, 2009 12:37 PM

What advanced civilization wouldn't travel millions of miles across the icy expanses of deep space just to jam power tools up a redneck's ass?

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at May 22, 2009 1:09 PM

you used to scifi network's logo to review the history channel show...

Posted by: Remrandt at May 22, 2009 1:53 PM

I couldn't have said it better myself. AMEN!
Thanks for the article, it has been
Twittered-shared through http://twitter.com/IQXS
to our 700+ die-hard Twitter UFO
enthusiasts galaxy-wide. We track the latest in
UFO News, Views, Pix and Vids, 24/7.

IQXS is the "Twitter Ticker Tape" of the
21st Century for all things of Alien Affairs.
Come along and follow....tin foil hats, optional!

Posted by: IQXS at May 22, 2009 1:53 PM

UFO hunters has only been on for a couple years. how long have people been looking for signs of extra-terrestrial life/investigating ufos? uh, since the 1940's at the very least.

if you expect the show to find some amazing discovery every episode you are a fool.

Posted by: Ty at May 22, 2009 1:55 PM

I think this show does have it's over dramatic moments and sometimes crazy witnesses, but I think you undermine all the amazing evidence that they've uncovered since the shows inception.

The possible alien artifact that Bob White found was tested and found to contain metal alloys that were super conductors and very rare. So rare that we hardly have them anywhere on this planet. THAT was a great episode.

Not only that, think about the investigating of the Aurora UFO crash of the 1800's. They found that the town's mayer DID have a watertower, which a lot of sceptics said he didn't. They proved that wrong.

In fact, they are very good at disproving sceptic theories on that show.

I for one loved this show. It wasn't perfect, but it was the best UFO show on TV yet.

Posted by: Will at May 22, 2009 4:16 PM

Did you see the episode when Bill told one of thier interviewees that he was possibly being prepared by the aliens to be informed that he was a human-alien hybrid?

Fucking hilarious.

Posted by: David McTaintwaffle at May 22, 2009 4:21 PM

5 Tips For UFO Hunting.

1) Wear red or orange as bright colors attract alien spacecraft.

2) Avoid cities or any populated area.

3) If you have a dental retainer, wear it, as the metal in the apparatus, in combination with the enamel of human teeth, serves as a honing beacon for alien spacecraft.

4) Keep window open at night, so that you may be easily transported into the spacecraft for fertilization ritual.

5) Drive a pick-up.

Posted by: michael murray at May 22, 2009 5:00 PM

.~.

It is my opinion that the hard reality of the UFO/ET phenomenon lies far beyond the right of "entertainment", in shows like UFO Hunters, in justifying their creative endeavor. The show was useless and counter-productive. Sheer, staged entertainment, ignoring the greater, more important part of the reality. They presented their "data" nearly sterile of the true human element; representing a scant shadow of the reality of what really goes on in the "world" of UFOs and the Alien Agendas. To me, it was an utter atrocity.

Television has gone from it's tongue-in-cheek presentation of UFO news-reporting to prime-time manipulated, mocking, UFO melodrama! What a stellar evolutionary leap in consciousness.

The show, dare I suggest, the "programming", was an abomination to truth and an utter insult to the true working researchers of the phenomenon. It did nothing to further or enhance the countless hours of painstaking research done by the multitude of unsung heroes of the UFO community. Was the idea to made a farce of the true investigators that have dedicated their lives and personal resources to the goal of presenting the truth based on sound logic, reason, research and facts?

The UFO phenomenon is not at all simple and hardly entertaining when the reality of it is lived every day of one's life.

Hats off to whomever determined to throw the show into File 13. That move was long overdue for some of us.

IQXS

Posted by: IQXS at May 22, 2009 7:18 PM

if any of you tried to be part of a ufo show on any network you'd be sent in the same direction.

you'd come up with no greater evidence. admit it, or point me in the direction of where you did something incredible for ufology, please.

everyone's too scared to walk in their shoes but can work up the nerve to be critics.

I said it before, if you expect any group of people to come up with some groundbreaking evidence/conclusions of UFO's in a period of 1-3 years. you are an idiot.

Posted by: Ty at May 22, 2009 8:25 PM

"Birnes, probably somewhere in his mid-60s, is almost always seen wearing aviator sunglasses and a baseball hat, as if trying to conceal his identity from those who would want him eliminated"

that is fucking stupid.

He is instructed to wear sunglasses by his doctor. his eyes are very sensitive to light. maybe do some research before you write a review.

Posted by: Tom at May 22, 2009 10:07 PM

The only time I have ever watched this show was on a Saturday morning after a Friday night college party. One of my guy friends refused to put pants on until we let him watch an entire episode of UFO Hunters. Our desire for him to put on pants greatly outweighed our desire to watch amusing hangover TV, which is really saying something.

This has nothing to do with...anything, actually. But I saw the logo and felt the need to share.

Posted by: Bethany at May 23, 2009 12:17 AM

I think an excellent premise for a UFO/Alien themed show would be to focus on a different person who investigates UFO phenomena. Each episode would be a character study, rather than a stagy attempt to recreate and explain something that is unexplainable and unrepeatable. You'd see the passion, eccentricity and determination contained within each person, and you'd get to hear their opinions, experiences and evidence of the extraterrestrial.

Posted by: michael murray at May 23, 2009 1:16 AM

I watched about 5 minutes of this show a few weeks ago. They were "investigating" a place here in NM (not Roswell) where there was a battle between the aliens and the humans. When they first arrived to investigate, somebody was sitting by the side of the road when a cop arrived. He asked the cop if he was there during the battle, and the cop replied "I can't talk about that".

Anybody above the age of 3 would call "Bullshit" right there. I did. I stopped watching right there.

Happily, there's a sequel. Just a few days later I met a couple who were from that very town. I mentioned the battle, and they said they knew some of the interviewees. And to my complete lack of surprise, it turns out that, as the gentleman I was talking to revealed, "the locals up there just love to screw with the white folks".

Complete stupidity. The only thing I've ever seen that showed less intelligence was in a UFO book I read for a paper in college. Two boys showed up late for school, covered in mud. When grilled, they explained that they had been chased by a UFO and forced to take shelter under a bridge down by the river. Whenever they tried to sneak out, they were chased back under the bridge. Finally, their clever scheme thwarted the aliens, who got frustrated and left.

This drivel was reported in the Book as Pure Fact. I'll always remember the Grad Ass., as he buried his face in his hands and laughed his head off as I told the exciting and suspenseful tale.

Short version of it all, is UFOs are possible, but I've never seen a better explanation of them than the "Teasers" (I hope that's the right term) from Hitchhiker's Guide.

Posted by: History Geek at May 24, 2009 2:49 PM

"UFO Hunters” is really just a piece of fiction scripted for children and zealots."

Boy, for someone that writes a regular public column, you certainly did a great job here of elucidating your ignorance of what is "fiction".

Would you mind citing just one example of information, that is presented in the UFO Hunters episode you are referring to, that claims to be an absolute fact when instead a fictional reality is clearly the case as demonstrated by your proof?

(please include the proof for your contention)

Be specific and drop the feigned mirror image of opinion based entertaining rhetoric please.

Try and not to be as assuming as you have already made yourself out to be. In this short, trite and ridiculously uninformed article, you have merely made clear the tainted skeptic's point of view. The object of real skepticism is to remain uncertain until absolute fact is made known to illustrate irrefutable. How have you done that by going at this critique with such an absolute predisposition?

This series has done a wonderful job of presenting this phenomenon from all sides. Sure, it has the wackos spouting their typical suspicions for entertainment's sake, but it also has a far more balanced, amiable, investigative and truly skeptical view that is made more than evident within it's presentation as well. For every witness who's methods or identities are suspect, there's three that are rock solid, meat and potatoes types of witnesses with more than substantial credentials.

Me thinks you ought to stick with cartoon analogies. You are much better at those. Entertaining even.

Posted by: Electrafixtion at May 26, 2009 11:27 AM

When I wrote about UFO Hunters being a piece of "fiction" I meant that in a manner that is it idiomatically "television." For instance, reality TV is scripted, rather than an organic document that rises out of natural human behavior. In the same way, UFO Hunters is recreating an abstract, largely intellectual pursuit, in a visual way. In that manner, it's a fiction, and given the confines of the medium, and the limited time they have to recreate their investigation in this medium, what we're seeing is a 'scripted fiction."

Cynically, the end goal of any commercial TV enterprise is to make money, and so it is with UFO Hunters. They're creating entertainment, and to do so, they often play fast and loose with objectivity. In the case of the true believer, it's not seeing is believing, but believing is seeing, and so there starting point is certainty ( look at Bill), not their end point. They start out believing that they know the truth, and then look to be dissuaded. Honestly, it's like religion.

I'm all in when it comes to investigating extraterrestrial life, but they start to lose me with elaborate conspiracy theories ( I mean, it's tough enough to get three friends to share a secret over a weekend, let alone a network on invested nations spanning decades), and desperate attempts to stuff square pegs into flying saucer holes.

I like it best when they leave the outcome to mystery, like anything else in life, and allow it to settle, however uncomfortably or convincingly, with an engaged audience. I have no doubt that stuff is out there, but I'm just not convinced they're going to contact us through TV executives.

Michael Murray

Posted by: michael murray at May 30, 2009 3:38 PM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.



Related Posts with Thumbnails









twitter_badge-thumb-300x110-5250.jpg facebook-thumb-300x112-5252.jpg




recentreview.jpg