web
counter
 

"The Borgias" Review: What Would Rome Be Without a Good Plot?

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (27)



borgaiss.jpg

Typically when reviewing a pilot television episode, unless it is mostly worthless and unredeemable, we try not to indict the show based on its introduction. We look at the premise, at the characters, at the actors playing them, and we attempt to surmise if there’s any promise for the series. There are countless brilliant television shows that began with weak pilots, the NBC Thursday night comedies (“The Office,” “Community,” “30 Rock,” and “Parks and Recreation) not least among them. But they all displayed potential, and each — at their peaks — met that promise.

Showtime’s new series, “The Borgias,” which premiered last night, may be one of the few television pilots with the exact opposite problem: It may never be able to live up to the pilot episode. It was flat-out brilliant — strong characters, dense plotting, engrossing story lines, and sex, murder, intrigue, all bathed in bloody religion. At times, it felt a little unhinged, but thanks to Jeremy Irons — as well as Neil Jordan who created the series and wrote and directed the pilot episode — it never went off the rails. This is not a Starz caliber costume drama — it is, at least based on the pilot, the “Tudors” and “Rome” minus the dead spots, the agonozing pacing, the lecturing and pontification and the endless political strategizing. It is good. I only hope that it can keep up the pace without careening into shitballs “Spartacus: Blood and Sand” territory before the third episode.

“The Borgias” is being described by Showtime’s marketing department as the original crime family, the 15th Century Sopranos, and it’s far more apt than I expected. It is based on the House of Borgia, a family that rose in prominence in the 1400s and 1500s and, apparently, made a lot of enemies. I’m certain that Neil Jordan took some liberties with the family, but based on the first couple of paragraphs in the Wikipedia entry, the pilot depicts plenty of the “adultery, simony, theft, rape, bribery, incest, and murder” for which the family was known. I don’t dare to read further into the Wikipedia entry for fear of having future episode spoiled, but given the events of the first weeks of Rodrigo Borgias’s reign as Pope Alexander VI, I have no doubt that the family is ripe with story lines of greed, murder, sex and corruption.

The series opens in 1492, as one Pope is dying and as the College of Cardinals is planning their vote on a successor. Typically, with this sort of history-based show, I would expect that the first episode or, perhaps, the first season would focus on all the Machievellan machinations, backstabs, and murders it would take to elevate Rodrigo Borgia to Pope. However, all of that is disposed of within the first half hour, and the show quickly kicks into gear. Within the first hour-and-a-half, there are two murders, political manoeuvrings on both sides (some in the College are seeking to have the Pope deposed), a concubine, a Pope-and-his-sort-of-wife throw down, and a triple agent, Micheletto (Sean Harris) who, so far, is the psychotically ruthless star of the show. This guy is fucking heartless, as you’d have to be to outshine Jeremy Irons.

Still, Jeremy Irons as the Pope is, well, he’s Jeremy Irons. What do you expect? He’s a brilliantly delicious anti-hero, someone who is really fun to watch do bad, bad things. François Arnaud is also quite excellent as the Pope’s oldest son and closest ally, a man who would rather be wearing armor than the cloth, and a man who is also madly, creepily in love with his 14-year-old sister. David Oakes is the younger son, the soldier slash jester, while Joanne Whalley as the not-quite wife of the Pope is already holding her own as the preceding successor to Carmela Soprano.

I do not typically buy into these TV period soap opera series. I tried very hard to get invested in both “Rome” and “The Tudors” only to lose interest, not because of the quality of those shows, but because of the pacing and subject matter. It is often, too, that these shows seem to elevate costumes and set design over plotting, but Neil Jordan puts a lot of focus on the story without doing so at the expense of the period setting and wardrobe, which ought to easily satiate the costume drama enthusiasts frill fix. It is truly a gripping opening episode, and because the series is only scheduled for six more (and the Medicis have yet to make an appearance), I have no doubt that Jordan can keep up the pace and fill the rest of the series with as much murder, conniving, sex, and political and literal backstabbing as he packed into the opener. With this, AMC’s “The Killing” (review forthcoming) and “Games of Thrones” set to air in a few weeks on HBO, Sunday nights just became the best goddamn television night of the week.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Everything Must Go Trailer: The Return of Stranger than Fiction Will Ferrell | AMC's "The Killing" Review: Slow, Wet and Squirmy (That's What She Said!)









Comments

You do realize the plural of "Borgia" is "Borgias," right? And that that is the name of the show?

Posted by: deadnotsleeping at April 4, 2011 11:09 AM

deadnotsleeping dripping disdain for Dustin's grasp of the show's name notwithstanding, I think I was just talked into a DVD purchase this fall. I love this kind of show when it's done well, and Jeremy Irons is the type of guy you forget about and don't actively seek out, but always delivers and makes you wonder why he doesn't get more roles.

Posted by: Kballs at April 4, 2011 11:16 AM

It's stupid, but I can't watch this without cringing because I think Assassin's Creed did a better job of capturing Cesare Borgia. They made him creepy AND bad ass.

That whelp they cast for the show is NOT Cesare Borgia, come on.

Posted by: Madeleine Roux at April 4, 2011 11:31 AM

Still, Jeremy Irons as the Pope is, well, he’s Jeremy Irons. What do you expect? He’s a brilliantly delicious anti-hero, someone who is really fun to watch do bad, bad things.

I can practically hear his malevolent laughing. Maybe all the banner ads for this show that are plastered around the internet are correct after all?

Posted by: branded at April 4, 2011 11:34 AM

“There are countless brilliant television shows that began with weak pilots, the NBC Thursday night comedies (“The Office,” “Community,” “30 Rock,” and “Parks and Recreation) not least among them. But they all displayed potential, and each — at their peaks — met that promise.”


And therein lies the problem, slightly above average is the new brilliant. Snooki gets 32 thousand dollars to speak at Rutgers, while Toni Morrison, a Nobel and Pulitzer Prize winner gets 30 thousand from the same university. Brilliant used to mean something, now it means being able to pick out matching socks.


I loves me some Jeremy Irons, the only thing he has to do is look at a motherfucker with that stare of his.

Posted by: Pookie at April 4, 2011 11:35 AM

Good to know it was that good.

It was tough for me to get into "The Tudors" because, deep down, it all boiled down to Henry and his wandering peen -- and a topic that's been dealt with before by other writers and shows.

"The Borgias" has yet to be mined and the capacity to create something will be good to watch.

Good thing I'll have to wait till DVD. BTW, Dustin, any word coming on the 10-minute preview of "Game of Thrones"?

Posted by: Fredo at April 4, 2011 11:35 AM

I absolutely loved the pilot episode! So much that I watched it a second time. The plot shows a lot of promise. The costumes and sets are fabulous, but they are not what makes the show. The assassin was one of the creepiest characters I've seen in a long time -- but I like him. That's not easy to pull off.

I thought it was slightly overacted, which is common with premier cable pilots, but not nearly as much as other shows. I get the sense they will all settle down and take us on a gloriously wicked ride. It probably helps that I like the time period enough to have made it the focus of my studies, but that didn't help when I watched The Tudors. This show is what I've been looking for in terms of costume drama.

Posted by: Reba at April 4, 2011 11:37 AM

Well, it can't be worse than The Tudors, can it? I enjoyed maybe a few episodes of that show, but the inaccuracies, the ludicrous dialogue and Jonathan Rhys-Myers' scenery chewing got really exhausting for me. But oh...Jeremy Irons. I can't see the show right now anyway, so I guess I'll wait until I see how people feel about the season as a whole before I step into it.

And hey, Spartacus careening into shitballs insane territory is the main reason why that show is so awesome.

Posted by: Figgy at April 4, 2011 11:44 AM

(Also the full-frontal male nudity)

Posted by: Figgy at April 4, 2011 11:45 AM

Yeah, figgy, I was going to mention the sexy priest action, but I didn't know how well that would go over.

Posted by: Reba at April 4, 2011 11:49 AM

"manoeuvrings"
---
And DR outs himself as an OMD fan.

Also: Well said, Pookie.

Posted by: , at April 4, 2011 11:58 AM

I might watch this just to see Priest enjoying the company of women for a change.

What?

Posted by: Pookie at April 4, 2011 12:21 PM

invoking Machiavelli, seemingly cluelessly, in the course of writing a review of a show about the Borgias - just, wow.

Posted by: JrFanBoy at April 4, 2011 12:24 PM

I think it's the Corleones, rather than the Sopranos, who are being heavily referenced here.

Posted by: xoxoxoe at April 4, 2011 12:36 PM

Seven episodes? That's it?

Posted by: Todd at April 4, 2011 12:45 PM

Joanne Whalley?

For the love of all things sacred to my childhood, what is it going to take to get Irons to drop down on one knee and profess to her "I love you Sorsha!".

And then she proceeds to kick him in the face.

PLEASE GOD PLEASE!

Posted by: D-Day at April 4, 2011 12:46 PM

" . . . I don’t dare to read further into the Wikipedia entry for fear of having future episode spoiled, . . ."

Spoilers? You don't want SPOILERS? It's fookin history! Oh, I forgot. They don't teach history in America, do they?

Posted by: BWeaves at April 4, 2011 2:32 PM

Oh, I forgot. They don't teach history in America, do they?

Pishaw! Let me tell you about some of the finer points of "history" as taught by the American school system:

-Indians have feathers in their headbands, awesome names, and are always very smiley when the white man comes and hands them shiny, valuable trinkets and blankets to keep warm in the harsh winters.

-Asia didn't exist until some guy named "Meow" came through and made them communalists or something.

-After we freed the slaves, they told us "don't worry about us anymore, we totally got this shit".

-We've never ever ever ever ever ever lost a war.

-French people smell, Germans wear pointy helmets, and the only thing England has ever done wrong was make us pay damn, dirty taxes.

-Jesus was reincarnated, and he adopted the guise of a stately California fellow named "Ronald Reagan". He proceeded to defeat the Soviets, the Robot Uprising of 1987, wrote the Constitution on a cherry tree with his eye lasers, fought with Batman to defeat Darkseid, and laid the foundation for the once broken and tattered nation of the United States.

I got your history right here.

Posted by: D-Day at April 4, 2011 2:49 PM

I liked 'The Tudors' mainly because I'm already a big fan of that period of English history. Also, the supporting characters (Natalie Dormer, James Frain and Sarah Bolger to name a few) more than made up for Jonathan Rhys-Meyers' vaguely shouty performance.

I'll definitely be giving this one a go. Even if it looks like it'll be based less on actual history and more on the Mario Puzo novel.

Posted by: Aislinn at April 4, 2011 3:17 PM

I had to stop reading a couple of lines in, 'cause I haven't seen it yet. And I just wanted to know if it was good!

Posted by: Candee at April 4, 2011 3:31 PM

The costumes, scenery and hair (oh yum the hair) is what will keep me watching this, because it won't be the writing. The plot was fun and tight-paced, but the dialogue was comethefuckon stupid. (In my humble opinion.) I love Catholic history, I get off on it, and it's hurting my heart a little to see it presented like they handed off the episode outline to some bewildered PA and told him to make people say things.

Dustin, it's sad you soured on Rome. If you ever have a fairly free weekend, I advise you to watch the last episode of season 1 and then proceed along to season 2 - for it is at this point when it feels like they abandon the fuckboring history and start taking cues from Shakespeare. And that is only ever a good thing.

Posted by: Ling at April 4, 2011 6:07 PM

I too dislike Rome and the likes because of the continental-drift-slow pace and the whole of political shenanigans that keep on promising without ever delivering (or only doing so at season's end).

But ok, ok, alrighty then, I guess I'll watch this... So many people talking big shit of it...

Posted by: godzilla_foil at April 4, 2011 6:55 PM

Sorry you didn't like Rome. I thought it was an excellent mix of history, politics, sex of course, and some very creepy people. I did not watch original broadcasts but on DVD, but only 1 episode at a time. I guess the whole short-attention-span thing is real, even among apparently educated people.

Posted by: joeff at April 4, 2011 9:38 PM

The Borgias really were that lawless, deceitful, and outright evil. I can see how someone might view this show as stretching the truth, but I figure that the show isn't that far off from the reality. I wrote a paper on Lucrezia in college and that family is far more effed up than most things you'll find on a television.

Posted by: Melody at April 4, 2011 10:10 PM

Melody - Word. The Borgias were right up there with the Medicis in terms of willingness to buy you off or cut your throat - whichever seemed most efficient - to get what they wanted. The Sforzas were not far behind, but they never did manage the villainy of those other two houses. I don't know that you could exaggerate their excesses and still get it produced on cable. They were that brutal.

Posted by: Reba at April 4, 2011 11:05 PM

Great show, it really caught my attention off the bat. Working for DISH Network I luckily was able to get a Jeremy Irons cardboard cutout that I have in my TV room, I have one from Shameless and The Sopranos too! Make sure not to miss episode two on DISH Network channel 318 in great HD. Showtime has done it again!

Posted by: Bob Affet at April 9, 2011 1:07 PM

I stumbled upon a really good blog that is devoted for the moment to recapping The Borgias - I don't think it's that well-known, but the blog title is excellent:

http://benevolentclicktator.blogspot.com/

Posted by: Ling at May 3, 2011 11:42 PM