web
counter
 

Oh Look a Procedural, How Novel

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (11)



rizzoli-and-isles-fashion.jpg

Is a really good hot dog better than a mediocre steak? That’s the problem at the heart of reviewing. To some degree you have to judge a television series or film on its own merits. Criticizing “Always Sunny in Philadelphia” for all the things that “The Wire” does better is really missing the point of the former and trivializing the latter. But take that hair splitting too far and you end up in the car commercial zone, the one in which every single automobile manufactured each year manages to win a “best in class” trophy. Of course, it’s not a problem with truly great and truly bad shows. “Battlestar Galactica” is unqualified awesome. “According to Jim” is unqualified shit. It’s the morass in the middle where it gets tricky, where you find yourself saying “well it’s not a great show, but it’s a decent procedural/sitcom/snuff film.” And that’s the hill on which “Rizzoli and Isles” stakes its flag.

The procedural has two basic formulas: team and odd-couple. In the former, there’s a team of FBI agents, police officers, crime scene scientists, and wacky hackers who are all wunderkinds and have their own very special roles to play, even if it only involves sunglasses and speech disabilities. In the odd-couple formula, the story centers more closely on a pair of partners, usually one is the tough cop and the other is the geeky scientist. Shows like “CSI,” “Criminal Minds,” and “Without a Trace” tend towards the first formula, while “Rizzoli and Isles” aims at the second formula. Some shows straddle the line by having a strong team element that surrounds an odd couple, like “Bones.” Oddly, the granddaddy of procedurals, “Law & Order,” doesn’t really fit into the two formulas at all, which might have something to do with the actual quality it managed for all those years.

“Rizzoli and Isles” sets up Angie Harmon (of “Law & Order” and “Jason Sehorn Proposed to me on Leno” fame) as Jane Rizzoli, a tough, working class Boston homicide detective, and Sasha Alexander (of “NCIS” fame where she played “right-between-the-eyes-Kate”) as Maura Isles, a medical examiner from an upper crust upbringing. Somebody dies before the credits every episode and then those crazy kids get to work solving the crime.

The show tries to play up its Boston setting for flavor, but since essentially everything I know about Boston comes from movies or history books, I have no idea if there’s any level of accuracy to it. And I’m not sure if wondering why a show about working class Bostonians only has one guy talking like Good Will Hunting makes me grossly ignorant, the show grossly inaccurate, or a combination thereof. All I know for sure is that clearly there’s something about the city that apparently attracts former “Law & Order” assistant DAs.

The show’s best episodes are the ones tied most closely to the book series upon which it is based. Those feature a serial killer named Hoyt who was kicked out of medical school for being mean to the corpses, and who has taken a special interest in Rizzoli. She bears scars on both palms where he pinned her hands with scalpels, and Michael Massee plays the role with terrific creepiness. The murder-of-the-week episodes that make up the bulk of the series are perfectly serviceable procedurals, with the right balance of who-dunnitness and good character interaction. Alexander and Harmon have a natural camaraderie that buoys the show, and their supporting cast holds their own. Harmon in particular does a great job actually managing to convey the tough tomboy character despite the suspension of disbelief required by the simple fact that she looks like Angie Harmon. Chazz Palminteri is inexplicably on the show as Rizzoli’s father, and he seems to be channeling Christopher Walken’s corpse for the role.

It’s got the usual new show pile of things that just don’t quite work that will probably get ironed out. Isles in particular has the irritating tendency to speak in overly technical terms, but the way it’s written doesn’t come across as endearing and cluelessly socially awkward. No matter how socially awkward people are, they don’t unironically say that someone stretched [the technical names for facial muscles] instead of the word “smile.”

I classify television shows (at least the ones good enough to watch) on three levels. There is the appointment level, where you watch that damned show the instant it’s available. There is the regular level, in which you watch every episode in order, and pause it when you go to the other room for a minute, but it’s not so good that you don’t end up watching three or four episodes at a time as they build up in a queue. Then there’s the lowest level, which means you put it on for background noise while you’re making dinner. It’s better than nothing, entertaining in its own right, but you don’t feel as if you’re missing anything if you take the garbage out mid-scene, or even lose an occasional episode as it expires on Hulu. “Rizzoli and Isles” is firmly in that last category.


Steven Lloyd Wilson is a hopeless romantic and the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. His novel, ramblings, and assorted fictions coalesce at www.burningviolin.com. You can email him here.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Most Anticipated New Fall Shows (2010 Edition) | Sarah Palin Has Got It All! | Trade News that Will Razz Your Berries









Comments

I agree whole-heartedly. I watched it out of bored curiousity and only continued to space out time between True Blood eps. I literally just watched the season finale and was put off by two things.

1. Why does Sticky Fingaz have to play the drug/arms dealer?! I know his name is Sticky Fingaz to begin with but could they give the brother a break and make him a bit less stereotypical.

2. The last minute of slo-mo was excruciating. I know it's a finale and all that shit but slo-mo of a gunshot scene should be 20 seconds tops. Otherwise, you're lurching into John Woo territory for no damn reason.

Jett Jackson is in it, which brings me humor to see how far he's come since the series and classes at USC during my year. He holds his own, I cannot lie.

Isles pet tortoise is also too much. But hey, it does pass the time better than Hawthorne where I'm yelling at the bad writing every two minutes while I wait for Michael Vartan to pop back up.

Posted by: Teresa at September 15, 2010 4:17 PM

I saw the first three episodes of this. I thought Angie Harmon was terrible - maybe she improved? Also, instead of Rizzoli and Isles those eps were Rizzoli and Friends, with Isles getting maybe three scenes.

In my mind, if you need to watch serviceable procedurals you are better off with White Collar, Psych and The Closer (and I stopped watching The Closer). Or you can start watching Terriers, which looks like it has the potential to be more than just a serviceable procedural.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at September 15, 2010 4:43 PM

I started watching purely to see how Jett Jackson and Bruce McGill were doing these days, and ended up seeing the first few episodes. The problem for me is that Isles is too much of a rip off of characters like Bones or House, but not as interesting as either. So I end up watching reruns of those shows rather than new eps of Rizzoli and Isles.
Also, I read the books (admittedly long ago), and thought the relationship between the two characters and their individual personalities came across as much more interesting in print.

Posted by: badkittyuno at September 15, 2010 4:47 PM

I admit that this show is not that good. I still watch it. I'm sorry. I really enjoy watching Angie Harmon have actual human emotions after only knowing her as hot-ADA-droid-bot on L&O for so long. Plus her hair is so shiny and pretty.

Posted by: JenVegas at September 15, 2010 5:02 PM

L&O the granddaddy of all procedurals? I only hope your too young to remember Hill Street Blues, SLW. If not, I shall be very cross with you.

Great, now I've got the Hills Street Blues opening theme stuck in my head.

Posted by: Dugs at September 16, 2010 4:25 AM

Hey, Dugs, have the Dragnet theme instead. Ripped from the headlines stories - or they would have been if the papers had been as focused on sensationalism as they are now.

I tried to watch Rizzoli & Isles, but as neither of them so much as drops a single 'r', I cannot believe they are from New England, much less working-class or upper-class Boston. Also, there are not nearly enough shots of the actual city to make me buy that they're not in Vancouver or wherever the show is actually shot. If it turns out to be shot in Boston, then the location team needs to be beaten. I'm homesick enough that I might watch if given a hint of the real Boston.

Posted by: Reba at September 16, 2010 4:55 PM

Meh. I watch it here and there because Angie and Sasha are SUPER easy on the eyes. As for the "Boston" location...it's more likely downtown LA and studio back lots. They do the same window-blur thing that they do (did?) on Crossing Jordan, which makes it that much more noticeable. (They might as well green screen a blurry star-field like we're at warp 10 on the Enterprise circa TNG)

They also mispronounce street names that any Emerson/BU/Northeastern college freshman would have down week one. (Tremont is pronounced TRIM-mont, not TREE-mont in Boston).

Also Angie Harmon's cute-as-pie Texas drawl is ALL OVER her fake "Boston" accent. She needs to Netflix 'Southie' with Donnie Walberg (small role with Will Arnet!) and brush up on her 'pahk tha cahs'.

BOTTOM LINE: Serviceable procedural with 2X the boobies of most procedurals (with apologies to both Cagney and Lacey).
F.

Posted by: fatback at September 17, 2010 5:13 PM

Hello Pajiba team,

I was impressed by your cool content and I believe we can work together.
We have a free service you can use to increase hits on your site.

Your site can potentially get 40,000 - 45,000 extra visitors from MGID monthly using our news widget.

Can we discuss our partnership?


All the best,
Traffic Guru: David Lucas
MGID inc.

Posted by: David at November 24, 2010 5:20 AM

My husband and I read the Rizzoli novels so we were really looking forward to watching Rizzoli and Isles. The show was TERRIBLE and Harmon couldn't act her way out of a wet paper bag. My husband asked me to change the channel half way through and I had no problem doing it. My grown daughter watched it at her house and she told me several days later she changed the channel after 20 minutes because the show was bad-d-d-d and agreed that Harmon was a bad actress.

Posted by: Yolanda at November 28, 2010 2:28 PM

Agreed, very well written and can't wait for the second half.

Posted by: Phyllis at December 11, 2010 8:24 AM

Agreed, very well written and can't wait for the second half.

Posted by: Shelia at December 11, 2010 10:31 PM