web
counter
 

Nice Legs Can Only Take You So Far

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (15)



weeds-season-6.jpg

After the third season of “Weeds,” when Nancy Botwin torched the city of Agrestic, and scorched the “Little Boxes” theme before moving to Ren Mar, I applauded the series for recognizing that it had cornered itself into a narrative corner and hitting the reset button. Doing it again only two seasons later, however, is just desperate. Reinventing yourself is one thing. but this is a television show, not Madonna’s career. You can’t just uproot the Botwin family every few years and start all over.

Or, maybe you can. Maybe season six will be the season that “Weeds” returns to its roots, that the dark comedy lightens up. Maybe it’ll try to stop selling Mary Louise Parker’s legs as a narrative device (they’re nice legs; don’t get me wrong. But how many times can you use them to get you out of trouble?) Maybe they’ll back away from the ridiculous notion that Nancy and Andy might end up together romantically. Maybe the comedy will veer away from the nihilistic. Maybe Nancy will redeem herself as a mother.

I wouldn’t put too much faith in it, though. We’ve been hoping for the same return to form for three seasons now, and they never seem to follow through on it. Granted, last season was significantly better than the third and fourth season; the characters are slightly less misanthropic, although Nancy’s parental neglect has had a profound affect on Shane, who is now a fucking murderer. But hey! In the season premiere, at least Nancy cared enough to split town with the kids before her husband and the father of her child, Esteban, had her and her family killed for killing his political consultant.

Unfortunately, it looks like the sixth season won’t be a complete redo: The first episode picks up after the murder, and only takes us as far as Nancy and Co. skipping town, with Andy in tow, after his fiancée (Alanis Morisette) dumped him for not showing the requisite chivalry in a kidnap and hostage situation. It seems clear, however, that Esteban and his henchmen will continue as background characters throughout the season, as they attempt to hunt Nancy and her child down, so we’ll continue to have to deal with them. At least until Shane kills Esteban. But, season six will give Nancy a fresh start in her career, and we’ll see how long it takes her to devolve into this mess she’s become again over the last five season.

Personally, I’m just weary of her nonchalance. Her oldest son, Silas, sleeps with a woman her age, and she shrugs it off. Her youngest son kills another woman (who maybe deserved it, but still), and she gets drunk, packs up the car — with only her things, of course — and moves the family so they can repeat the cycle again. Shane, meanwhile, shrugs it off, just as Nancy has shrugged off every death and near-death experience she’s had since her FBI boyfriend who shot and killed.

Indeed, “Weeds” is less a show about learning from your mistakes, and more about repeating them. And with every reinvention, the characters will probably find another way to repeat their same sins. Nancy is not a heroic mother trying to maintain her family’s lifestyle anymore. She’s not even an anti-hero that resorts to necessary ends to meet her means. She’s the show’s major villain, And the only way anyone is going to grow as a character on this show is to separate themselves from her and her behavior.

But she does have nice legs.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba 17/08/10 | Animal Kingdom Review | Help Me Get Away From Myself









Comments

Isn't this more of a "preview?"

Posted by: Kballs at August 17, 2010 1:08 PM

Hey - remember when the FBI boyfriend was shot and killed? That made me sick to my stomach. I think it says something that Shane elicited no visceral response.

These stopped being characters will real consequences and turned in to caricatures a while ago.

Posted by: Dulli1419 at August 17, 2010 1:09 PM

I think that's the point. Nancy IS the villain. She has destroyed her family's lives. She is myopic, self centered, and damn near sociopathic. I love the show but I will admit in the series finale I want to see Nancy go down in flames.

Posted by: TylerDFC at August 17, 2010 1:33 PM

I found it pretty telling in this episode when Silas said even when he was a small child, Nancy was totally oblivious and self-absorbed. Interesting depth to her behavior over the course of the show, as we never saw how she was with Judah.

Posted by: Brian at August 17, 2010 1:42 PM

I think it's good that last season the show and the characters started to really acknowledge that Nancy is the villian and brings them all down. In the first few seasons Celia was kind of the comic villian everyone loved to hate. But Nancy is such a terrible person now that it's become ridiculous. Like, the fact that she packed up her shit before hitting the road but wouldn't let the kids pack anything? What was the point of that? Just to remind us she's selfish? Also, if you're on the run from your connected underworld/politician boyfriend, wouldn't you throw away your cell phone? I wasn't impressed with this first episode...hoping it gets better.

Posted by: Katie at August 17, 2010 2:00 PM

For a season opener, and one where they had only minutes to pack up and leave town, the episode moved way too slowly. And I'm already annoyed with Shane. Andy is awesome as always, but the show is not getting better.

Posted by: Riles at August 17, 2010 2:13 PM

Yah there's no denying Nancy has been poised to be the villain from the very start.
She will probably die some sudden death the way some of her ill-fated companions have. Still like the show though.

Posted by: allison at August 17, 2010 2:32 PM

I agree that Nancy has been set up to be the villian from the beginning, it's really our perspective has changed. The episode where Celia was dressed up like Nancy really drove home the point for me - she was the "bad guy" early on, but she didn't have what it takes to be as awful as Nancy.

I'm definitely not on board with the Nancy/Andy romance thing, but considering that Andy has really evolved the most over the series, and become more responsible, it would be really interesting if he's the one who has to turn her in or cause her ultimate downfall in some way, in order to protect Shane or something.

Posted by: shell at August 17, 2010 3:21 PM

I'm not only weary of her nonchalance, I fucking despise her character. I watched this show religiously for the first three seasons and then got bored. Every now and then I catch an episode and I'm just surprised why her family hasn't ditched her a long time ago. Shane needs to end up in prison (before he completely goes insane) and Nancy in a strait jacket in a padded cell.

Posted by: Lola at August 17, 2010 4:33 PM

And, the Bitch abandoned her new baby to her psychopathic Mexican mobster boyfriend. At least I didn't see the little tyke in tow when they decided to split. I never even heard the kid mentioned. He didn't die last year and I slept though it?

Maybe it was a dream, a terrible dream! You know, like Pam Ewing had that time?

Posted by: mechadave at August 17, 2010 8:54 PM

Those are all good points, but... the LEGS.

Posted by: Uriah Creep at August 17, 2010 10:10 PM

The baby was in a car-seat, behind Andy.

Posted by: Matthew at August 17, 2010 11:21 PM

Having finally accepted the fact that Nancy is now the villain, I actually quite liked this episode. For me, Nancy flipped when she had the perfect gig running the maternity store and instead just had to explore the tunnel to Mexico. She had a perfect job, but was bored.

Anyhow, I loved Shane. I know I shouldn't, but his response to the murder was great. People not knowing the proper name for a croquet mallet was the only thing that annoyed him. Thoughts: he has gone completely cold on the inside, he is still in shock from being shot, or his sense of values have been skewed from to much time living with the Mexican mob. I really hope it is the last one, cause it has the greatest potential for dark comedy laughs.

Posted by: Morgan Lefai at August 18, 2010 3:30 AM

The momentum of the episode was weird. Like how far was it between the house in Renmar and Pilar's Mexican (I think) estate? But it tied up the threads from last season well. I especially liked, and will miss, Audra. I thought Alanis did a great job. There were several good lines. And Silas constant cutting remarks to Nancy were perfectly timed and funny. I especially liked "We're gonna need money, what with all the SHOPPING we're gonna be doing!" She grabs all of her useless shit but doesn't let the boys get anything. Like, I don't know, pictures of Judah maybe. And the way she manipulated Andy into coming with them? Ugh. Audra was testing him, you could SEE she was testing him, and he still blew it because he can't resist getting sucked into Nancy's world of chaos. She really is a monster.

Posted by: TylerDFC at August 18, 2010 6:49 AM

As many of the posters here have noted, Nancy is the villain of this piece. I had to shift my paradigm in regards to her character. At first I thought she was a basically decent housewife with an adventurous/manipulative/selfish streak. It turns out that “streak” is her core personality and being a decent mother/parent was the streak. Running out of money just made her reveal her true colors.

In most TV programs, we expect the character to evolve; to learn from their mistakes and become better people. That aint the case with Nancy. She’s a bad person and because she’s so self-absorbed she’s not going to change.
The messed up thing about her is that because she’s gorgeous and charismatic, she gets away with being such a manipulative harpy. I want to hate her. I really do. But… I love me some Nancy.

Posted by: M Slade at February 26, 2011 9:10 PM