web
counter
 

"Grimm" Review: You Sure Aren't Looking Good

By Sarah Carlson | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (18)



GRIMM-NBC-550x366.jpg

The TV world has resembled the film one quite a bit this fall, taking a play from Hollywood’s book of delivering two similarly themed projects at about the same time and hoping audiences won’t mind. We’ve already been introduced to the ’60s (the cancelled “The Playboy Club” on NBC and ABC’s “Pan Am”) and the awesomeness of man (“Man Up” and “Last Man Standing,” both ABC), and all of these shows range from “Meh” to “This is what’s wrong with society.” This week, we received the fairy tale portion of the fall repetitiveness, first with ABC’s “Once Upon a Time” on Sunday and now NBC’s “Grimm,” which premieres tonight. And like “Once,” a flawed yet potential-filled show, “Grimm” lacks the courage to be truly bold and unique. The premise, again, is an OK one: What if the folk tales recorded by Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm were true and there exists a line of criminal profilers who can see the monsters of the Grimm brothers’ tales for what they really are? If only the execution of the drama, created by Stephen Carpenter, David Greenwalt and Jim Kouf, were as clever.

Parts of “Grimm” are appealing, starting with the opening in which a sorority girl, clad in a red hoodie, heads for a jog in the Portland, Ore., woods as “Sweet Dreams (Are Made of This)” by the Eurythmics plays on her iPod and for the audience. A figurine of a small girl (looking a bit like Gretel sans Hansel) perched on a log catches the jogger’s eye, and as she stops to examine it, she’s attacked. Screaming and what could be munching sounds ensue off camera, but this isn’t “Walking Dead”-level creepy. What that show lacks in writing it makes up for in mood, which “Grimm” sorely needs. The monsters (at least in the pilot) aren’t as scary, and the lead? He’s downright dull. Portland homicide detective Nick Burkhardt (David Giuntoli) is the Grimm here, although he doesn’t yet know his fantastical fate as he investigates the jogger’s murder. He’s busy preparing to propose to his girlfriend, Juliette (Bitsie Tulloch), and taking a good old ribbing from his partner, Hank Griffin (Russell Hornsby). He’s dull, too. Together, these two could be the nicest and most boring detectives in history, the anti-McNulty and Bunk.

The “Grimm” character that does have potential is Eddie Monroe (Silas Weir Mitchell), a reformed Grimm creature himself (a werewolf) whom Nick comes across while investigating another crime, this time the disappearance of a young girl, who also happened to be wearing a red hoodie. Nick can see Eddie’s true nature — Eddie’s head shifts into wolf form when he smells children walking by his house — and Nick only recently began seeing such things. The face on a pretty woman the day before transformed into a monster’s; so did the face on a prisoner at the station. But instead of questing his sanity, Nick didn’t give the occurrences much thought.

His Aunt Marie (Kate Burton) however, unexpectedly shows up at his house to let him in on the reason why he’s seeing freaks on the streets. He’s part a long line of Grimms (we have to assume the brothers were, too) who are charged with battling mythological creatures, who in turn are aware of Grimms and are fighting back. Marie is dying of cancer, meaning her powers are transferring to Nick. The detailed books Marie has in the trailer she brought help fill Nick in on his new plight, and Eddie sets himself up to become a reluctant and wise-cracking sidekick, helping Nick look for another Big Bad Wolf who could be responsible for the red-clothing-induced crimes. Future episodes appear to cover more tales from the Brothers Grimm, such as Snow White and Cinderella.

Not a bad concept. If only Nick were more than a pretty face and Giuntoli had Mitchell’s charisma. Building a genre show around such bland or despised characters is risky, although with a strong enough supporting cast, it can work (see “The Vampire Diaries,” “True Blood”). But Nick is surrounded by equally uninteresting people, especially Hank. How they examine the crime scene where the jogger was ripped to shreds speaks volumes of the series itself:

Nick: [Walking through woods] “Do you hear something?”
Hank: “What?”
Nick: “Music … Hank, we got an iPod over here.” [Kneeling down beside it]
Hank: “What’s the song?” [Thinking it sounds familiar]
Nick: ” ‘Sweet Dreams.’ “
Hank: “The Eurythmics! One of their better. [Kind of singing] ‘Sweet dreams are made of these, who am I to disagree?’ “
Nick: [Smiling, slapping Hank’s knee and standing up] “I didn’t know you couldn’t sing.”
Both: [Stand up, walk away, leave the iPod playing]

Such an awkward, wasted moment. (And was the song on repeat? Who jogs to that on repeat?) The use of “Sweet Dreams” went from ominous to ridiculous, and the detectives’ banter is unbelievable and unnecessary. Why not just let the audience in on the fact the song is still playing, panning to the iPod as the detectives are in the background, then cutting away? Or why not give the detectives some better lines — not even an easy Annie Lennox joke?

“Grimm” is worth watching for a few episodes to see if the cast and production team find a solid rhythm for telling the darker original side of fairy tales, which mostly have been sanitized throughout the centuries. But whether the drama will get better is unclear because “Grimm” suffers from the same problem “Once Upon a Time” does: It’s too middle-of-the-road. Either go dark, or go light. Either make us scared and wondering if werewolves really do exist, or make us chuckle right along with the detectives as they bat about witticisms and approach their world wryly. Pick a direction, TV writers. The mundanity is killing me.

“Grimm” airs at 9/8C Fridays on NBC.

Sarah Carlson has a front-row seat to the decline of the newspaper industry and lives in Alabama with her overly excitable Pembroke Welsh corgi.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



In Time Review: The Right Idea for the Time, the Wrong Movie for the Ages | The Rum Diary Review: A Meek Voice of Celluloid and Muted Rage









Comments

So basically what we are missing from these shows is scenes like Snow White emptying a 9mm into Shere Khan while screaming "You vicious motherfucker!" as in the brilliant comic series "Fables".

I STILL don't know why Fables creator Bill Willingham hasn't sued ABC. Say what you will about it not being an original idea, but Fables WAS set to be a series on ABC last year. Suddenly that project is dead, and Once Upon a Time is thrust on us. I call bullshit. I'm not watching that show on general principal.

Grimm at least is trying to have a different spin. Sort of The X-Files meets, well, Fables. Disappointed it's this bland though.

Posted by: TylerDFC at October 28, 2011 1:53 PM

Too bad. The premise has great potential. If only someone would give Jasper Fforde a screenwriting gig.

Posted by: PaddyDog at October 28, 2011 1:58 PM

I'd be interested to see which of the Grimm's tales they use. I just re-read them a few months ago, and there are some really fucked up stories.

To see a Ffordian twist on the Grimm tales would be almost too fabulous to bear.

Posted by: Captain Tuttle at October 28, 2011 2:18 PM

PaddyDog: Especially if Thursday Next is the lead character.

Posted by: TylerDFC at October 28, 2011 2:20 PM

I found this show somewhere on the tubes and I think the line was

"I didn't know you couldn't sing"

Which is marginally better but didn't make that exchange any less painful.

Posted by: Orser at October 28, 2011 2:23 PM

Hmm, I'm a sucker for stuff like this.

But if you want dark supernatural TV, try "The Fades" on BBC. That's downright scary stuff.

I also mentioned "Lost Girl" recently, a Buffy-esque canadian series on Showtime, that does more or less the same thing as Grimm, but with a female PI.

Posted by: FabMax at October 28, 2011 2:36 PM

Orser: Watching the clip again, I think you're right about the line being "couldn't sing." I've changed the post to reflect that. Thanks! -- Sarah

Posted by: Sarah Carlson at October 28, 2011 3:17 PM

So not good enough to ditch "Fringe" for? Good to know.

Posted by: Slash at October 28, 2011 4:20 PM

I echo DFC. I demand Bufkin be given a role in this series.

Posted by: Matty at October 28, 2011 4:42 PM

Good review Sarah. It WAS odd that the scariest character was the cancer-ridden and bald Kate Burton who along with the charm of Mitchell saved this episode. I want to give this show a chance. The ominous moss-covered Portland locales set a nice tone and the pace didn't bother me. Remember, before Buffy and Angel, Greenwalt wrote for the short-lived late 90s show PROFIT, which also started slowly and had seemingly boring stars...

Posted by: Straight2the9 at October 29, 2011 9:14 AM

I'm not a terribly deep thinker and I take most of these shows at face value rather than looking for some sort of symbolism such as the use of "Sweet Dreams". I thought the scene where they found the ipod was just a way to show these guys are comfortable and friendly with each other. Also, they didn't actually leave the ipod running since they showed them with it bagged and tagged for evidence in the next scene.

I'm a sucker for "urban fantasy" so I'm pretty happy with both fairy tale shows so far.

Posted by: snapnhiss at October 29, 2011 1:09 PM

The main character, Nick, is a little dull, but he did seem to be freaking out a bit about everything going on in his life (ie: the scene where he jumps when the cat makes a noise outside his house, worrying about his reputation on the force for "crying wolf").

I also liked his partner and their relationship. I thought it was nice that the partner was the one that put the pieces together about the real bad guy.

Also, I hope that the frail aunt reveals her hidden badassery that was hinted at a couple of times.

Posted by: jvo at October 29, 2011 2:08 PM

Nick is so dull I can only imagine what sort of ferocious sexual acts he had to have performed to land this role.

He reminds me of Superman's short, less-attractive, uninteresting cousin.

I miss Pushing Daisies. These fairy tale shows could have been so cool. *sigh*

Posted by: Alexis at October 29, 2011 3:02 PM

Has Sweet Dreams always been so overused in pop culture, or is this a recent innovation? Tron Legacy, Suckerpunch, and now this? At least in the other two, it had a purpose: remind us of the 80s, and point out that THIS IS A STORY ABOUT DREAMS, respectively. Here it's just... an excuse for some Z-Grade "banter?"

Posted by: Frodo Baggins at October 29, 2011 3:34 PM

Needs more Kolchak.

Posted by: , at October 31, 2011 8:21 PM

I'm not leaning one way or another with this show. I like the concept and I'm curious to see how they bring about all fairy tale characters. If you missed it, I found it on my job’s website, DISHonline.com where they're showing the pilot free. There’s a possibility that this show could be a hit, it’s always difficult to tell from just one episode whether or not a show can pickup and get good.

Posted by: Nicole at November 1, 2011 11:23 PM

Nicole, did you watch the third episode, "Beeware"? It becomes painfully obvious at that point that the show is complete shit.

Posted by: Sherri at November 16, 2011 8:35 AM

I love this show! Then again, I may be a little biased because I live and have lived in Portland my whole life

Posted by: Brian at December 10, 2011 12:59 AM