web
counter
 

PANEM ET CIRCENSES

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Seriously Random Lists | Comments (13)



javier460.jpg

It’s my first year in the Online Film Critics Society, so I was a bit overwhelmed and overjoyed when we started getting inundated with screener copies of films in theatres and invitations to screenings of films that haven’t gotten released yet. (I’m not gonna lie — there’s something remarkably satisfying about watching a movie on a DVD from the comfort of your own underpants that hasn’t even arrived in theatres yet.) I’ve personally got fourteen films to watch on my desk right now, plus a list of at least that many more to watch before the year is out. I’ve been trying to keep a running list of the potential nominees as I watch each film — and it’s been difficult. I’ve got at least four to seven in each category already, and I still haven’t even seen some of the foreign films. Every time I think I’m free, they keep pulling me back in.

This year is going to actually be a fight for the Oscar.

I thought about doing one of those predictive Oscar lists that everyone compiles roundabouts this time o’ year — the speculations as to whose gonna get a nomination that everyone uses as crib sheets to make their own choices. And honestly, does it matter? How many times do you want to read the same list that has Inception, Black Swan, 127 Hours, The Fighter, and The King’s Speech on it? My guesses are gonna be the same as others, though in nominations as I do NCAA March Madness brackets, I like to make some completely irrational calls. Gonzaga for the win!

Instead, I had a better idea. I just finished Suzanne Collins’ remarkable young-adult trilogy The Hunger Games, which I cannot recommend highly enough. In it, the totalitarian society forces each of 12 districts to perform a lottery to select two tributes to go forth and represent them in a battle to the death in a vast arena for the amusement of the folks living lavishly in the Capitol. So I decided, well, it’s gonna be a pretty savage competition for this year’s Oscars, and pretty much everyone is well deserving of a nomination, so why bother picking who deserves it by talent? Instead, as I love so much to do, I’ve decided to figure out who among eight or so nominees would win if the Oscars were based on gladiatorial combat. Because that’s how most contests should be decided. By Spartacus levels of nudity and violence in monster truck arena presided over by wild-bearded Joaquin Phoenix. He’s still here.

BEST ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE
Jeff Bridges, True Grit
Jesse Eisenberg, The Social Network
Leonardo DiCaprio, Inception
James Franco, 127 Hours
Colin Firth, The King’s Speech
Ryan Gosling, Blue Valentine
Robert Duvall, Get Low
Javier Bardem, Biutiful

Eisenberg might have learned how to survive the Zombie Apocalypse with the double tap, but he’s easily gonna be the first person out in this exchange. His spindly little arms and nervous ticks might make him a delight to watch on screen, but when it comes to severe beatings, Eisenberg’s gonna get whomped. DiCaprio is probably convinced he’s an action star, with his youthful charm and smooth delivery, but he’s a prep-school boxer at best. If he were facing down Clooney and the usual Winklevoss ilk, he might fare better. But this isn’t Marquis of Queensbury rules, this is Fight Club, motherfucker. And he’s sinking like a frozen little bitch. I’d give Franco the edge if someone angried him up, but he’s a lover not a fighter. He’d probably stick it in there a little longer than most because it’d take a few minutes for his brain to register that his ribs were missing. He’s a fit fella, but he’s the kind of guy who breaks up bar fights, not starts them. So I could see Duvall and Bridges ganging up and kidney cracking him.

Colin Firth seems like he’d stand off to the side for a bit, find himself a nice dueling rapier and blunderbuss and then dispatch folks who come close. Which again, would put him in a square face-off with the likes of DiCaprio and those little suit-wearing mofos, but look who’s left? There will be fucking blood, and while I think Firth could spill his share, he’s eventually gonna get out grizzlied. Gosling puts on that “Hey Girl” shine, and he seems like he’d be a stoner pacifist like Franco, but he’s got a psychotic streak that is easy to overlook. Not Ben Foster crazy, maybe a few scions below that. In fact, I could imagine him aping Franco, trying to put up a duel “chill” vibe, before Franco-shanking Jimmyboy in the kidney. If this wasn’t being fought in close quarters, in a gladiatorial style duel, he’d probably disappear off into the woods, find one of the corpses, and make weapons out of the sharpened femurs of his foes. As it stands, I think he’s gonna try to stay toe to toe, and that’s where he’ll lose out. He’s gonna weaken a few of his fellow fighters, but I’m almost positive that he’s out sooner than later.

Duvall’s old, but he’s crafty and vicious. I think a few of these guys would step to him first and get a face full of axe. Duvall’s an old bear, but he’s got plenty of scars. Also, he’s borderline insane. Again, if this were some sort of wilderness type fight, Duvall and Gosling might have better odds. I just think age will finally take its toll, and Bardem and Bridges will respect their elders and eventually hack him to wrinkled old bits. Bridges is another one that would make this seem like it’d be a pacifist bong off. But lest we forget, he’s already got experience in arena combat, even reprising the role for TRON: Legacy. I doubt he’s gonna be working with lightbikes and laser discs, but still, after watching his Rooster Cogburn, The Dude is not a man to be fucked with. Again, I think he’d last by staying out of the initial scrum and then taking down anyone who steps to him. But unfortunately, he’s dealing with Javier Bardem. Bardem is certifiably insane. He’s like Dolph Lundgren, only you can take his acting seriously. I can actually see Bardem getting the first kill, ripping off Eisenberg’s head and bathing himself in his nebbish blood. Bardem’s probably going to do the most killing, either initiating combat on the pacifists or finishing off the victors of individual showdowns. I don’t even think he needs weapons, though I can imagine he’d probably arm himself with something pointy and heavy and start bloodying up the competition.

Bardem’s your clear winner here.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Hitchens Hates Beck, Obama Hates the Democrats, and Congress Hates the Gays | Political Thing One and Thing Two | Pajiba Love 12/10/10









Comments

after watching his Rooster Cogburn,

I fucking hate you.

/not really

Posted by: Fredo at December 10, 2010 11:08 AM

What Fredo said. So is TRUE GRIT as sublimely fantastic as the previews make it look? We're dying here, Prisco!

After that review for The Fighter I'm surprised Bale and/or Wahlberg are not on the list.

Posted by: TylerDFC at December 10, 2010 11:12 AM

1) The Hunger Games trilogy was great. I second your recommendation.

2) I agree completely with TylerDFC. After that review of The Fighter, which I loved, by the way (the review, haven't seen the movie yet), I was expecting the Bale on here. He's crazy, he's scrappy, and this doesn't seem like a fair gladiator showdown without him. I'm fairly certain he would just rip chunks out of the others with his teeth. He's got to be hungry.

(I believe Bale is up for Supporting Actor and will likely be featured in a future installment. -- DR)

Posted by: Shonda at December 10, 2010 11:33 AM

I think you're grossly underestimating Leonardo Dicaprio. He was mega badass in The Departed, and even though he's got a "heal the world" mentality about him, I think he could snap quite easily.

Posted by: Melissa at December 10, 2010 11:39 AM

I think Leonardo DiCaprio is getting one at some point. I don't think Inception will be the thing that propels him to a win, but he's so close to getting one that he's just due.

Posted by: Matt at December 10, 2010 11:47 AM

I'm squeeing at the Hunger Games theme.

Bardem is your District 2 career psychopath.
Duvall is the grizzled vet alcoholic.
Bridges is the canny player who gets waxed in the third act for thinking he's smarter than he actually is.
DiCaprio & Gosling are anonymous cornucopia victims.
Franco dies an anonymous, boring end by setting an intricate trap no one falls into.
Eisenberg disappears and but then croaks after eating someone's inadvertently poisoned food.

Colin Firth wins by subtly eviscerating anyone within range of his English wit.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at December 10, 2010 11:49 AM

You have to continue this theme and do Best Actress. I want to hear your take on a Nicole Kidman and Natalie Portman fight.

Posted by: Paultera at December 10, 2010 12:15 PM

I love The Hunger Games idea. And the books. Except I though the third one was only "meh."

Anyway, in a fight, my money's on Gosling as the dark horse win. I think he'd do a lot of swinging out of trees. And he seems like the sneakiest one by far. Plus, his sense of humor would a) win him sponsors and b) keep him from going out of his mind in a crazy death-jungle.

Posted by: esme at December 10, 2010 12:35 PM

Don't forget Franco is also the ring announcer. He might pull a Jesse Jackson: "The question is moot. It's my show, I win the prizes."

Posted by: sansho1 at December 10, 2010 12:49 PM

I'm on the third book now, thanks for no spoilers. Unless you're trying to say Javier Bardem shows up deus ex machina style and slaughters the lot of them. That I wouldn't mind.

Posted by: ThunderSacTriumph at December 10, 2010 12:53 PM

Great article- but I have one question. Isn't one of the tenets of Pajiba that there are NO advance screenings or invites to private events, because you don't want to be beholden to anyone when writing a scathing review for bitchy people (us)? I don't want to detract from the glorious bloodbath here (though I think Bridges would end up skullfucking his final opponent for the win), but I was wondering if that first paragraph was a quiet acknowledgement of a change in Pajiba policy.

Posted by: RyanH at December 10, 2010 5:32 PM

Fair question. I'll answer in regards to myself. I'm very poor. So I go to the advanced press screenings when I can and when they are available. As you've noticed, it hasn't really changed my methods of beating the shit out of terrible movies (The Company Men) and praising the glorious ones (The Fighter). I'm not going to press junkets to do interviews, I'm not meeting with the actors or directors or producers. I'm getting to see the movies ahead of time for free. It hasn't changed my opinions on anything. I'd like to think that we're kind of above the sort of ass-kissery and ball-sucking that a lot of other folks demean theirselves with in order to get unprecedented access. So those sites are going to get invited to set visits and get to conduct interviews with the big stars. Going to advanced screenings and getting screeners doesn't change my content, it just means there can be more of it, because I can afford to review more movies when I'm not paying for as many.

Anyway, the advanced screenings are less glamorous than you'd imagine. We're not sitting in posh arenas with gads of the glitterati. We're in a small theatre with maybe twenty or so other folks that are either press or industry folks. It's not like I'm watching The Fighter with Bale. I'm with members of the Makeup Artists Union who are there for their nominations. Advanced screenings and premieres are two COMPLETELY DIFFERENT things. I assure you.

Posted by: Prisco at December 10, 2010 6:18 PM

I am all over this Hunger Games/Oscars mash-up. Brian Prisco, I love you.

Posted by: naivehelga at December 12, 2010 9:51 PM