free counter with statistics The Third Man | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

TheThirdMan.jpg
I Never Knew the Old Vienna


The Top 5 Noirs from the Classical Age: #3 The Third Man / Drew Morton

Pajiba Blockbusters | August 26, 2009 | Comments (26)


I would like to dedicate this retrospective to the “Save the UCLA Arts Library Petition” (AKA: Stop the closing of the library where Drew Morton gets his books so that he can continue to write thoughtful reviews like these). If you enjoyed the series and/or you’re a supporter of arts education, I strongly encourage you to sign the petition.

While the term film noir (literally “black film” for those non-Francophiles) was coined by French film critic Nino Frank in 1946, the first prolonged study devoted to the term did not appear until 1955 with the publication of Raymond Borde and Etienne Chaumeton’s Panorama du Film Noir Américain: 1941-1953 (A Panorama of American Film Noir: 1941-1953). Their definition is helpful but, as we shall see, also problematic. For Borde and Chaumeton, noir was “A ‘new’ series…from one country sharing certain traits.” Yet, as the years progressed, noir became an internationally complicated term. While the genre takes its name from a French phrase, draws influence from such international cinema movements as German expressionism and French poetic realism, is strongly indebted to the literature movements of French existentialism and the American hardboiled school, and was often practiced by European émigré directors, noir is often treated as being fundamentally American. As film scholars Alain Silver and Elizabeth Ward have written, noir is “an indigenous American form…a wholly American film style.” If we are to accept this definition, is our third greatest noir, the fittingly titled The Third Man (1949), truly a noir at all? After all, it was written by British novelist Graham Greene and directed by British filmmaker Carol Reed.

Let’s begin rather typically with a brief overview of the plot to help clarify. The film takes place in the war-torn and recovering Austrian capital of Vienna. In the aftermath of the war, the city was segregated into four zones, each policed by an Allied power. The film begins with the arrival of American novelist Holly Martens (Joseph Cotten), who has traveled to Vienna with the hope of gaining employment from his old friend, Harry Lime (Orson Welles). Shortly after arriving, Martens discovers that Lime was killed by oncoming traffic. At the funeral, Martens meets Lime’s girlfriend Anna (Alida Valli) and is questioned by two British Army officers, Sergeant Paine (Bernard Lee) and Major Calloway (Trevor Howard), regarding the character of his late friend. You see, the British police believe Lime was involved in the Viennese black market, peddling diluted (and potentially fatal) penicillin to military hospitals. Martens is quick to defend his fallen friend to the officers and, hoping to exonerate Lime, begins his own investigation. As his investigation progresses, Martens begins to suspect that Lime was murdered. That is, of course, until he finds the smirking Lime skulking around the city.

What can we glean from this summary in the hopes of better understanding the nationality of The Third Man and its possible identity as a noir? While scholar and Taxi Driver screenwriter Paul Schrader describes noir as being American in his “Notes on Film Noir,” he does write that there are indeed foreign offshoots, under which he specifically names The Third Man. Why would Schrader describe a British film as being noir? Well, quite simply, The Third Man fully realizes the bulk of his thematic and stylistic definition. Post-war disillusionment? Check. As Schrader notes, film noir often reflected the outlook that society was something less than worth fighting for and, in the Vienna of The Third Man, we have that exact environment. Friendship ultimately means little to Lime and, shockingly, even less to Martens. Moreover, the promise of a romantic relationship with Anna means even less to the two men. In the end, she is the only character who holds true to her principles, which is elegantly captured in the film’s final shot. While the film may not include other noir staples such as the femme fatale or the gratuitous violence that Borde and Chaumeton also use to define the term, the plot of The Third Man most definitely produces a “state of tension instilled in the spectator when the psychological reference points are removed.”

This state of tension is almost completely the product of Harry Lime. Take, for instance, the scene in which Lime and Martens engage in a dialogue aboard the Riesenrad, Vienna’s iconic Ferris wheel. Martens asks Lime if he has ever felt bad for the victims of his medicinal racket, to which he responds:

Victims? Don’t be melodramatic. Look down there. Tell me. Would you really feel any pity if one of those dots stopped moving forever? If I offered you twenty thousand pounds for every dot that stopped, would you really, old man, tell me to keep my money, or would you calculate how many dots you could afford to spare? Free of income tax, old man. Free of income tax - the only way you can save money nowadays.

Lime is quite clearly unscrupulous in his actions, as his remark that abstracts the value of human life will attest. Yet, thanks no doubt to Welles’ wonderful performance, we feel tempted by his proposal and we can’t help but half-agree when he describes his world-view in the film’s famous “Cuckoo Clock” speech (which Welles wrote himself):

Don’t be so gloomy. After all, it’s not that awful. Like the fella says, in Italy for 30 years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder, and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly love - they had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock. So long Holly!

It is a testament to the film’s greatness that Reed and screenwriter Graham Greene (again, aided by Welles) were fearless to portray Lime in such a charismatic fashion. As with most noirs, we are drawn to the charisma of the film’s villain, similar to that feeling we encounter when watching Robert Walker’s Bruno in Hitchcock’s Strangers on a Train (1951). This attraction to Lime is the element that draws me back to The Third Man. As with most crime films, it’s an intoxicating thrill to vicariously live on the dark side of human nature. Yet, it is also a frightening (perhaps even enlightening) experience when we become faced with the moral tension of living a life in which psychological reference points are removed.

While the plot and characterization of the film go a long way in solidifying the film’s status as a noir, the aesthetic of the film successfully seals the deal. Going back to Schrader’s definition, does The Third Man exhibit a post-war realism or, to be more specific, was the film shot on location? Absolutely. Not only was the film shot in the actual rubble of post-WWII Vienna but also the bulk of the climactic sewer chase was shot on location (much to the discomfort of Welles). Are the majority of the scenes lit for night? Obviously. Does the film engage in German expressionism’s preference for compositions consisting of oblique and vertical lines? Yes. In fact, Reed’s use of askew camera angles matches this description so infamously well that director William Wyler (The Best Years of Our Lives, Detective Story, and Ben-Hur) sent him a spirit level as encouragement to lose the compositional tendency! In the end, The Third Man, despite its lack of purebred American cinematic DNA, is both thematically and stylistically a noir.

Even today, the nationality of Carol Reed’s film remains a contested issue. To fully state the facts of the case, The Third Man was directed by a British film director, written by a British screenwriter, and produced by a Brit (Reed), a Hungarian born producer-director who worked extensively in the U.K. and U.S. (Alexander Korda), and an iconic Hollywood producer (David O. Selznick). In front of the camera were both the city of Vienna and a cast consisting of Italians, British, Austrians, and Americans. Yet, both the British Film Institute (BFI) and the American Film Institute (AFI) have declared it one of the best films ever produced in their respective countries. Perhaps the film and noir more generally are best defined as being analogous to the Vienna portrayed in the film: easily sub-divided into separate national zones, but defined overall by a tendency towards the international.

Waiting for a hint as to the identity of my second favorite film noir? Let’s just say that it holds some continuity of cast with The Third Man.

Drew Morton is a Ph.D. student in Cinema and Media Studies at the University of California-Los Angeles. He has previously written for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel and UWM Post and is the 2008 recipient of the Otis Ferguson Award for Critical Writing in Film Studies.


House of Games Review | House of the Devil Trailer



Comments

Um, why is Pajiba making me fall in love with it so hard lately? I haven't completely finished reading this, I'm saving it for later when I can really savor it, but wow. Please, more. I love this shit.

These are the movies I watch. Not because I'm snotty or hate anything new (I do occasionally watch stuff from 1970 onward and even brand new movies) but because all these old films I haven't seen are like new ones to me. And they're usually pretty damn good, so that doesn't hurt.

Anyway, I know I didn't address the topic here, but I have seen The Third Man and loved it (this made me want to watch it again) but I wanted to say thanks for articles such as these. They're great.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at August 26, 2009 5:05 PM

My prediction for #3 was correct - not that the clue was that much of a stretch. :- )

I have seen the debatable "noir" status of this film cause it to be left off other noir best lists. You made the case well for its inclusion.

This is simply one of the greats. Perhaps #1 and #2 will be higher on the list because they are more conventionally defined "film noir," but I can't imagine either will be a better film than The Third Man. I could watch this on an endless loop, and that breathtaking final shot remains my favorite final shot in all of film.

I do not recall if it was Siskel or Ebert, but back in the day when they named the greatest film villains, one of them chose Harry Lime at number one. (The other chose HAL 9000.)

Posted by: DarthCorleone at August 26, 2009 5:17 PM

Snuggie,

Thanks for the kind words. Very flattering.

Darth,

"The Third Man" is a finely oiled machine of a movie. Have you seen Robert Altman's "The Long Goodbye"? He pays very fitting homage to "Third Man"...

Also, if you're based in the LA area, the UCLA Film and Television Archive/Billy Wilder Theater at the Hammer is showing a 35mm of "Third Man" in October I believe. Part of their British noir series...

Posted by: Drew Morton at August 26, 2009 5:27 PM

This movie is tremendous and NEVER should be left off a noir list. Just for the scenes in the sewers alone.

Posted by: Blackcapricorn at August 26, 2009 5:34 PM

It's always nice to get some historical context on films. This was a great read.

But you did fail to mention the zither soundtrack that somehow works despite being a ridiculously cheery tune. Maybe it's the contrast with the subject matter that makes the music more unsettling than it really is.

Posted by: kelsy at August 26, 2009 5:47 PM

I had a feeling that not even including a fleeting reference to Anton Karas's score would get me a bit of flak.

It's deserved, and if it makes you feel any better, I did try to work it in, but the digression it went on stuck out like a sore thumb.

Hopefully this will keep you and the ghost of Karas at bay:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=te9fqm6rUPY

Posted by: Drew Morton at August 26, 2009 5:53 PM

I have been told that this film is shown day and night in Vienna. Anyone know if this is true?

Posted by: Arkansan at August 26, 2009 6:07 PM

Drew,

I gave you a pass on not mentioning the score because I didn't feel it makes the film distinctly noir, which is the focus of the series. It is a very interesting story, though, on how the music came to be.

Making the mention of the final shot so fleeting is thus also excusable. :- )

I've seen the majority of Altman, but I never got around to The Long Goodbye. I should check it out.

Thanks very much for the screening tip. I have yet to see The Third Man on the big screen and should look into checking that out as well.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at August 26, 2009 6:30 PM

Drew, I must disagree with you that friendship means less to Holly Martens than it does to Harry Lime. Holly's loyalty to Harry is a major part of his principles, and only in the end when he discovers what an amoral sociopath his 'friend' really is, does he decide to betray him.

Doing this, he realizes, will forever ruin whatever chance he has of having any chance that the girl he has fallen in love with will ever reciprocate his feelings for her. Yet he does it anyway, with the provision that she is not harmed.

And what of the girl? While she says she loves Harry, she seems more infatuated by his ability to procure whatever she needs to live comfortably in a post-war society than anything else.

Had Trevor Howard's character taken her through the children's hospital that she herself might witness firsthand the awful consequences of Harry's greed and selfishness, it is doubtful that it would have changed her feelings for Harry because in her own way she is just as greedy and selfish as he is. This is not love, nor is it principle. It is survival.

But God, I love this movie. I'm glad to see this film getting more and more attention as the years go by. One of the reasons why I like this film so much is because it avoids one of the most hoariest tenets in movie logic: That The Hero Must Get the Girl.

Might I suggest that Pajiba does a list/review of films where the guy doesn't get the girl at the end? let me get the ball rolling by offering up a couple to begin with:

1. The Verdict, with Paul Newman, and:
2. Gone, Baby, Gone, whose parallels with The Third Man are quite similar.

There are others that I can't think of right off the bat, which is why I leave the ball in your court. Although maybe Repo Man falls into the category with it's classic and timeless treatise on post-modern society:

"Otto, what about our relationship?"
"Huh?"
"Our relationship, Otto. What about our relationship?"
"What? Fuck that."

Posted by: TheUpsetter at August 26, 2009 6:45 PM

kelsy That's one thing I've found jarring in general with some old flicks--the soundtrack music versus the feel of the film and the action in the film. Too often, that's the weakest spot in a classic film. The music tends to be too happy/zippy/punchy. Maybe they just didn't have enough moody shit back then, I don't know. But it's unsettling to me. I can't think of a good example right off the top of my head, but I'll try to.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at August 26, 2009 6:50 PM

TheUpsetter >> I agree with you that Holly does value friendship highly, and that's ultimately the source of his inner conflict. I'm sure Drew will speak for himself, but I interpreted his statement simply to coincide with Holly's final decision, as it does juxtapose strongly with his own inclination and the wishes of Anna and Harry.

However, I strongly disagree with your characterization of Anna. There is a poignancy in the early scenes with Holly when she discusses Harry that goes far beyond mere self-preservation. If she did not actually love Harry, that final shot would be substantially less meaningful to me. Perhaps she is as much of a sociopath as Harry is, but that does not mean she would not put Harry as her highest priority.

Your mention of Gone Baby Gone (you do mean the Ben Affleck movie, right?) as being in this conversation gave me pause, but I do see the thematic parallels. It does seem an odd example of not "getting the girl," though, given that he had her in the first place and loses her. "Getting her" was never a goal of the protagonist, as it is in The Third Man. Interesting exercise, though...I'll try to think of more.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at August 26, 2009 7:04 PM

The music perhaps seems peppy, but there is a very bittersweet, nostalgic layer to the melody that suits the film perfectly.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at August 26, 2009 7:06 PM

Ooh! I haven't seen this movie in years, now I must see it again at once. It really is an excellent film, and I always feel a bit sad about how Orson Welles career turned out...man was a maverick/genius, and it'd be nice to have seen him do more in Hollywood. Tarantino is nothing compared to Welles. You hear me, Tarantino?

Joseph Cotten rocked also. An underrated actor, all but forgotten today, he was always interesting to watch.

Posted by: lil_a at August 26, 2009 7:33 PM

Upsetter and Darth,

I think Holly is too naive, which is why he is, ultimately, so easily swayed. After all, he doesn't turn on Harry immediately and the twist of the knife comes because Harry trusts Holly, enough to tell him where he's going, which Holly uses to set him up. It's that betrayal that, as Darth notes, makes me/us question his faithfulness.

Posted by: Drew Morton at August 26, 2009 8:32 PM

I just want to say thank you Drew, for schooling me. I am enjoying the noir pieces so much and I can't wait to see the films you're recommending (and to come back and reread these reviews).

Posted by: Cindy at August 26, 2009 8:50 PM

The way Pajiba has been going lately I half expected the article to be a rant about how the author just didn't get "The Third man". Color me surprised.

Posted by: Dano at August 26, 2009 8:54 PM

Cindy,

Thanks! I'm glad you enjoy them.

Dano,

Check out the rest of the retrospective, perhaps you'll find something else you like too.

Posted by: Drew Morton at August 26, 2009 8:57 PM

I'm guessing "Touch of Evil" at No. 2.

Man, I need to have a noir weekend.

These are outstanding, Drew.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at August 26, 2009 9:03 PM

that header picture of IT is upsetting me! like it's going to go all sumara and chase me down.
damn you, drew!

*takes 4 dexatrim and runs around like kate winslet*

Posted by: gp at August 27, 2009 12:18 AM

Bucdaddy,

Very astute.

GP,

Hunky Welles turning you on?

Posted by: Drew Morton at August 27, 2009 2:27 AM

To heck with noir, this is one of my top five films PERIOD. Maybe top three.

Posted by: Todd at August 27, 2009 9:43 AM

GODDAMNIT, yes. i had Third Man dreams. we were sitting around playing cards and suddenly welles was at the door and he wouldn't stop banging. i actually woke up and got out of bed 20 or so minutes before my alarm went off.

you cost me sleep with your black-and-white bullnutteries!

you owe me a 'tucking-in'!

Posted by: gp at August 27, 2009 9:49 AM

As a long time lover of all things noir (though certainly NOT a scholar, by any means) I am fascinated with your sharp, detailed analyses of these great films and appreciative of the knowledge you are imparting. I hope that all Pajibans take time to read these essays and take a first or even tenth look at classic film noir with a new respect and level of enjoyment.
Thanks, Drew.

* I'm also guessing 'A Touch Of Evil' because of the Welles connection.

Posted by: Spender at August 27, 2009 9:59 AM

Drew,

I agree with you in that Holly began the film as naive, but I don't think it is why "he is, ultimately, so easily swayed". I think his decision to betray Harry came about because by the end of the film, he matures and outgrows the naive and one-dimensional world views he had held. Through his dealings in shady Vienna, he realises that life is not as simple as the pulp cowboy fiction he writes (where the lines between the criminals and the law are clear cut and the good guy always gets the girl), and this is why he is able to shed his illusions of friendship with Harry, and with it, his steadfast loyalty.

Posted by: Laz_ at August 27, 2009 10:02 AM

GP,

You were fortunate. My Pajiba inspired dream was from that friggin' clown thread. Pennywise the clown was chasing my around all night. Let's call it even or tuck each other in.

Spender,

Thanks for the kind words. Not trying to brag or anything, but these are the hardest reviews I think I've written, simply because they are classic films, I feel a debt to them, and so much has already been said. The first night, when I was writing "Strangers on a Train," I had my heartbroken when I opened a Hitchcock book to find that the author singled out the wrought-iron gate scene. I felt crushed!

Laz,

But he still seems surprised when Anna doesn't join him, showing he has grown little if at all.

Posted by: Drew Morton at August 27, 2009 11:30 AM

Brilliant review! Brilliant movie!
The end scene is absolutely one of the best ever.

And I agree with TheUpsetter (at August 26, 2009 6:45 PM) "I'm glad to see this film getting more and more attention as the years go by."

The music is a perfect fit for this movie. The music at the time was zippy. It had to be. To keep spirits high during the war. Spirits that didn't sustain once the war ended. That to me is the essence of Noir (damn the "definitions")
And that it was actually shot in post war Vienna adds a whole dimension to the film that "gotham" set American Noir can't have. If Noir is about the American Male returning disillusioned from the war, this is the place he returned from. And the music is a perfect ironic counterpoint to Holly's loss of innocence.
Also, I keep seeing "Hollywood" whenever "Holly" is mentioned. ("Holly would"?)His naivete, his lack of guile, his "clear cut Cowboy stories". I wonder if that was actually intentional, as a dig to the lost naivete of America?: "Welcome to the World, fuckers!"

Posted by: Odnon at August 27, 2009 12:49 PM