web
counter
 

Your Highness Review: I'm Too Old for This Sh*t

By Daniel Carlson | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (50)



Your_Highness_review.png

David Gordon Green is going backwards. His first feature, George Washington, was a dazzling and insightful drama about children, and he followed that up with an equally intelligent look at twentysomething love and heartache in All the Real Girls. The one-two punch of Undertow and Snow Angels dealt with families and adult themes, and it seemed as if Green was both maturing as a filmmaker and hitting his stride in terms of being able to reliably replicate a kind of style: deliberately paced, gorgeously shot, keenly observed human dramas that were occasionally sprinkled with levity. This is not a bad kind of storyteller to be, and in fact, it’s pretty damn good. But then there was Pineapple Express, a turning point: it wasn’t just Green’s first comedy as a director, but his first film to regress along the aesthetic and emotional continuum along which he’d been happily moving toward mastery. Then he started directing “Eastbound & Down,” HBO’s absurdist dark comedy about a man-child operating completely free from reason or emotion. Now, with Your Highness, he’s gone back down to the level of children, but in the worst way. He’s made a puerile, empty, relentlessly dull comedy that wouldn’t even impress underachieving 14-year-olds were it not for the preponderance of breasts, penis jokes, and bizarrely strong homophobia. It’s hard to imagine who the film is even for, since the Internet provides much quicker access to all three, especially to teens who can’t get into an R-rated movie on their own. Your Highness is the emotional completion of an arc no one really saw coming, considering Green’s stunning early accomplishments. On its own, the film is merely a plodding, forgettable disappointment; coming from a man this talented, it’s a total failure.

The script’s biggest problem is that it doesn’t earn laughs, it expects them. Here’s an example: Thadeous (Danny McBride) and Fabious (James Franco) are brothers and princes in a faraway land that kind of resembles England in the Middle Ages as reconstructed with marginally cheap sets. The elder Fabious is in line for the throne, and he’s often accompanied on quests by Julie (Toby Jones), his aide. Thadeous hates Julie for reasons undisclosed, and when he sees him at the beginning of the film, he greets him with, “Hello, fucking Julie.” That’s not actually a joke, that’s a line a character can get away with after personality and history are established. Thadeous isn’t Kenny Powers, though, and it’s not enough to have McBride simply say “fuck” in a British accent that glides in and out of certain scenes. It’s lazy and more than a little smug, and indicative of the fact that Green and screenwriters McBride and Ben Best (also of “Eastbound and Down”) are not going to do much more than hope that viewers will recognize McBride from HBO and think it’s funny to hear him say this stuff on principle. Rather than work to craft funny or interesting scenes, the filmmakers merely prop up their actors, let McBride goof off, and move on to the next scene. Kevin Smith already proved that this trick only works once, if you’re lucky.

The central plot deals with the quest Thadeous and Fabious undertake to rescue Fabious’ true love, Belladonna (Zooey Deschanel), from the evil wizard Leezar (Justin Theroux), who has kidnapped her so that he can impregnate her on the night of the twin lunar eclipse, which will allow him to inseminate her with special seed that will let her birth a dragon. That event is referred to as The Fuckening. Leezar actually comes from a line of wizards who were thwarted years back in their own attempt to copulate and make a dragon, but since I’ve already spent more time explaining it than the film does (and have done so with slightly more clarity), you can probably ignore it. The real thrust is that Belladonna’s gone, and Thad and Fab have to find her, so they set off with Julie; Thad’s aide, Courtney (Rasmus Hardiker); and an assortment of knights.

The easiest parallel is Mel Brooks’ Robin Hood: Men in Tights: both films share a similar sensibility and are aimed squarely at 14-year-olds. (They both even feature female leads with chastity belts, which lets the films get off on being withholding, playing a weird sexual game with the viewers hoping to achieve some kind of mental coital closure.) But while Brooks was guilty of trying too hard, Green doesn’t try at all. He’s a talented dramatist but absolutely dreadful at directing comedies, refusing to inject any sense of excitement or pace into the film. Jokes burble up and float away seemingly at random, and Green seems almost lost in his attempts to give the scenes structure or rhythm. The same thing plagued Pineapple Express, which featured one laugh-out-loud moment in two hours (ironically, involving McBride and a low-end Korean hatchback) and seemed almost stubbornly resistant to any kind of shape or energy. Your Highness runs 102 minutes but feels half an hour longer simply because Green goes through the motions without making them pop. Part of this is likely because he’s used to being able to use the frame to tell the story, allowing light and color and balance to communicate as much or more emotion as the characters and dialogue. But comedies like this are candy-colored train wrecks, acting as pure delivery devices for their inane plots, and without being able to tell a story through arresting visuals, Green settles for just letting the story putter along.

There’s a definite ironic/meta component as well, and though it doesn’t reach Brooksian levels (no one here pulls out the script to see what will happen), there’s an unmistakable air of mockery throughout, as if the cast and crew would never really bring themselves to make an actual medieval farce and are thus reduced to making a half-hearted one. Anything relating to actual plot, character, or jokes is treated with kid gloves. The only times the filmmakers commit are when you don’t want them to, as when Thad and Fab visit a wise old hermit who turns out to be a puppet who molested Fab as a boy and who requests a hand job for helping them out. Right as you start to find yourself wondering if this is indeed the same James Franco from 127 Hours and “Freaks and Geeks,” Fab reaches into the thing’s pants and starts working its mercifully unseen shaft. How the mighty do tumble.

Franco is in aloof prankster mode throughout, and McBride just acts like himself but with that bad accent. Natalie Portman eventually appears as Isabel, a fellow adventurer who joins Thadeous and Fabious on their quest. She doesn’t feel quite committed to anything that’s happening on screen; her level of engagement is approximately on par with something you’d find in a short film on Funny or Die, and indeed, Your Highness could potentially be trimmed down to the best 15-minute comedy that site has ever seen. The rest of the cast amiably lopes around. Deschanel can’t have more than twenty lines, while Jones and the criminally wasted Damian Lewis find a predictable end. Even Theroux doesn’t get much to do. It’s as if the scenes involving Leezar and Belladonna were all shot on the quick in a few days and then slid into the final product as an afterthought.

The real center here is McBride, who gallops about, curses up an anachronistic and mostly repetitive storm, and basically kills time. It’s impossible to overstate how random the film really feels: the opening titles, designed to look like a picture book, suddenly sprouts sketches of penises and breasts as names roll by. It’s one thing for a movie like Superbad to at least relate that to the story; here, they’re just boobies and wieners, tossed in because why not, that’s what the little boys are here to see, right? And maybe they are. But the rest of us want a hell of a lot more, and Your Highness isn’t the place to get it. Green’s gone back to the bottom; now it’s time for him to turn around.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a member of the Houston Film Critics Society and the Online Film Critics Society. He’s also a TV blogger for the Houston Press. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Daydream Nation Trailer: Manufactured Whimsy, Counterfeit Comedy And The Art Of Film Trailer Manipulation | Julianne Moore Describes Working With Colin Firth And My Crush Grew Three Sizes This Day. On Him. Not Her. Well Both.









Comments

Not one of the commercials seemed funny to me, so I can't say I'm surprised.

Deschanel can’t have more than twenty lines

That's a plus, though.

Posted by: Todd at April 8, 2011 12:12 PM

When did it become acceptable to make jokes about child sexual abuse? Did they run out of gang rape material?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at April 8, 2011 12:17 PM

Not surprised. I went into Pineapple Express with high hopes (pardon the pun) and came out sorely disappointed.

There should be a term for when a crew of actors and/or directors that have teamed up before to make shit reunite to make more shit because they're such good friends and want to get paid for hanging out with their friends. I say we call it "Sandlerfucking" after the man who has perfected the technique.

Posted by: Fredo at April 8, 2011 12:19 PM

Ah shit. I had hoped this might turn out to be a fun, light hearted adventure movie. Its been a while since we've had one of those.

Posted by: elgarcon at April 8, 2011 12:19 PM

Sounds a lot like Year One. My God, was that movie terrible.

Posted by: JP at April 8, 2011 12:23 PM

... I liked Robin Hood: Men in Tights.

Posted by: maka at April 8, 2011 12:25 PM

NPR gave this broke-down mess a good review. A. Good. Review. . . NPR. I have no more words.

Posted by: Soandso at April 8, 2011 12:27 PM

NPR had just done 45 minutes on the ancient art of Scream Singing, so their judgment may have been a little bit off.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at April 8, 2011 12:30 PM

Mrs. Julien, do you mean rock screaming? I would have loved to hear that segment...

Posted by: Allen at April 8, 2011 12:34 PM

Mrs. Julien just won the Internet for her Patton Oswalt reference. Everyone else go home for the day.

Posted by: Daniel Carlson at April 8, 2011 12:34 PM

Do people around here not like Men in Tights?

Posted by: Socraz6 at April 8, 2011 12:35 PM

Thank you Dan! I need to get home and bake some cake, or perhaps pie or baclava. I haven't decided.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at April 8, 2011 12:36 PM

P.S. Here's the video. Relevant bit kicks in around 2:05:

http://comedians.jokes.com/patton-oswalt/videos/patton-oswalt---man-without-a-country

Posted by: Daniel Carlson at April 8, 2011 12:37 PM

I was already leaning away from seeing this, so this review cinches it more or less. But now I'm curious: "bizarrely strong homophobia"? Reading how they're treating child molestation of all things in this movie, I don't even want to know where they go with homophobia.

Posted by: Sassafrass Green at April 8, 2011 12:39 PM

@Sassafrass:

It's in there, though I omitted the biggest instance since it's a slight spoiler. But if you want it, here it is.

(SPOILER ALERT ET CETERA)

Franco gets betrayed by Damian Lewis and kills him, but as he's dying, Lewis repents. He says he always loved Franco, and Franco responds, "I loved you, too, as a knight loves a knight." Lewis says, "No, I loved you as a man loves a man." Franco says, "Ew," and lets the body drop. It's not like Laramie Project levels of hate or anything, but it's still indicative of the 14-year-old mindset that runs throughout the movie, namely, penises are hilarious but boys can't like boys. It's nothing new, it's just boring and lamentable.

Posted by: Daniel Carlson at April 8, 2011 12:43 PM

Did the fact that this is a stoner movie completely escape your attention?

Posted by: ERM at April 8, 2011 12:45 PM

"a puerile, empty, relentlessly dull comedy that wouldn’t even impress underachieving 14-year-olds were it not for the preponderance of breasts, penis jokes, and bizarrely strong homophobia"

umm, did you just define bad comedy aimed at teens? it will probably, as some celebrities say, "win"

so, in the annals (heheh, that word looks funny) of film, Porky's becomes legend because it proffered a generation of lads a peek at girl parts, but the new films that will undoubtedly titillate youngsters should be burned for stupidity. I got it, Pajiba's new slogan is "Get Off My Lawn"

Why do film makers keep making such a stupidly wide variety of movies when i know exactly what I want? I only like bad movies that cater to either my age, my genre preferences, or my taste in stars.

so, fuck off movie industry and give me a nice selection of movies that suit my daily mood.

Posted by: idleprimate at April 8, 2011 12:48 PM

Ironically and/or coincidentally, the Patton Oswalt link had an ad for this movie as a banner.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at April 8, 2011 12:48 PM

@ Dan

Yeah, that just seems really lazy and dumb. Thanks for elaborating! I'm glad I'll be dodging this bullet.

Posted by: Sassafrass Green at April 8, 2011 12:51 PM

Thank god! This sounds exactly like what I thought it was going to be. Sounds just as hilarious as I hoped. Can't wait.

Posted by: Sersiously, get over it. at April 8, 2011 12:53 PM

I only got about 30 minutes into Pineapple Express before I realized it could only possibly be considered funny if you were stoned into a coma. If this is in the same vein, then it really wouldn't be like Men in Tights, which is a very silly movie. Mel Brooks movies don't meander. They hop around, funny sketch to unfunny to unfunny to funny...there may be as many misses as hits, but you know if you give it a minute, there'll be another setup. Pineapple Express was just unfunny random nothingness.

And that's the exact impression I got from the trailer I saw yesterday. Natalie Portman looked like she just got shoulder-tapped on the subway by someone who mistook her for an old college roommate. Franco was trying to play the straight man in a scene completely devoid of humor, and McBride was the third-grade class clown, only lacking the spitballs and paper airplanes.

Ugh. My kid wants to see this to feed her Franco-crush. Maybe at the $2 theater and only if I want to punish her.

Posted by: Wednesday at April 8, 2011 12:56 PM

Maybe it's because its a nostalgic movie from my childhood, but I absolutely love Men in Tights.

This just looks bad.

Posted by: Caillan at April 8, 2011 12:56 PM

I'd rather read oglaf.com instead.

Best and most hilarious porno fantasy high adventure comic in the world.

With drift bears!

Posted by: twig at April 8, 2011 1:09 PM

I've also been thinking of David Gordon Green's "backslide" into stoner comedies. I find it inherently interesting that his career does seem to mimick the lifespan of Mork from Ork. But, I like his comedies. A lot. So, I don't bregrudge them. I do, however, wish he'd find a way to make both comedies and dramas, as he is even better at the latter.

Also, this movie's greatest strength and weakness are the same thing; it's clear in the title: Your Highness.

Posted by: RobP at April 8, 2011 1:10 PM

men it tights is great. Guess I'll have to go check this one out.

Posted by: asstastic at April 8, 2011 1:23 PM

Am I the only person in the world that doesn't think that Danny McBride is funny in ANYTHING he's done?

Why is it that some people without a smidgen of talent keep getting movie roles?

The eternal mystery of the universe...

Posted by: OldSchool60 at April 8, 2011 1:34 PM

I could be wrong here, but I think McBride and Green went to school together at the NC School of the Arts. Instead of effectively using McBride in a small part (like in All the Real Girls), Green's career seems to have shifted in order to accomodate McBride's rising star. It's strange. He really is capable of so much more.

But you couldn't pay me to see Snow Angels again. Holy fuck. That was depressing.

Posted by: Mel C. at April 8, 2011 1:38 PM

Bad Monty Python, perchance?

Posted by: Jerry at April 8, 2011 1:40 PM

@Mel C.: Yeah, they did go to college together, made movies together there; along with the other creator/writer/director of East Bound (and Observe and Report, and that movie where McBride is the karate instructor -- cannot, for the life of me, remember his name). It's really no different than Wes Anderson, Owen Wilson, and Luke Wilson. They just make different types of movies.

Posted by: RobP at April 8, 2011 1:42 PM

Zooey Deschannel and outspoken underage anal intercourse advocate Natalie Portman, a one-two punch of box-office failure.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 8, 2011 1:43 PM

I like the word "smidgen", for some reason it makes me hungry.

Posted by: snapnhiss at April 8, 2011 1:45 PM

@RobP

Jody Hill

Posted by: maka at April 8, 2011 1:49 PM

As for the commentary on the director's regression, I agree that it seems a little depressing.

As for the overall review, I'm willing to bet I will still love this movie, as I loved Pineapple Express. I can't defend it, but then again, I shouldn't have to.

You people (Yeah, I said "you people") need to calm down. I'm sure from the perspective of the pretentious cinephile, comments like "Danny McBride isn't funny," are valid. From the perspective of someone who, for some reason, thinks Danny McBride is funny, however, it's nonsensical. Shall we fight over our favourite colours or whether chicken is superior to beef as well?

I know this site caters to said "pretentious cinephiles" so I can't hold the review or the comments against you. All I'm saying is, try not to let it get you so upset. It ain't no thang. Not everyone can afford to cultivate such an elite view of cinema. The guy who pumps your gas will love this movie, and I don't see anything wrong with that.

P.s. - I can't wait to hear McBride say "Hello, fucking Julie." That sounds awesome.

Posted by: DAventhal at April 8, 2011 1:51 PM

They also went to school with Paul Schneider, and I just have to say, he's delightful. Why is he not in more?

So underused on Parks and Rec, but excellent in All the Real Girls, Lars and the Real Girl and Bright Star.

Just now noticed that there's a real girl theme to his work.

Posted by: elizabeth at April 8, 2011 1:56 PM

The guy who pumps your gas will love this movie, and I don't see anything wrong with that.

Hmm...nobody pumps my gas. I guess nobody will love this movie.

Posted by: Wednesday at April 8, 2011 2:47 PM

Men in Tights is about as funny as most of the Jim Abrahams movies following Airplane!.

Which means they mostly suck like a night of SNL with a few funnies scattered about.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at April 8, 2011 3:00 PM

Strongest selling point: Portman's Posterior.

Posted by: Recondite at April 8, 2011 3:07 PM

Anyone besides me look at this thing and think "Oh shit they pulled this piece of turd off a dusty shelf when Portman won the Oscar"..

Had to have been produced years ago. HAD TO! Portman isn't even acknowledging its existence.

Posted by: JuiceinLA at April 8, 2011 3:22 PM

The guy who pumps your gas will love this movie, and I don't see anything wrong with that.
Hmm...nobody pumps my gas. I guess nobody will love this movie.
Posted by: Wednesday at April 8, 2011 2:47 PM

For the record, that made me laugh. Good job.

Hopefully you still get my point, nitpicking aside.

Posted by: Daventhal at April 8, 2011 5:04 PM

Anyone besides me look at this thing and think "Oh shit they pulled this piece of turd off a dusty shelf when Portman won the Oscar"..

Had to have been produced years ago. HAD TO! Portman isn't even acknowledging its existence.

According to Wikipedia it finished shooting in October '09. I don't that, is that a long time to edit and finish everything?

Posted by: pissant at April 8, 2011 5:29 PM

ERM - exactly. This is a stoner movie and will have the same audience as Superbad, Step Brothers, The Other Guys, Pineapple Express, etc. Pineapple, by-the-by, is better on the second viewing. There are a lot of little jokes and quips that you don't catch on the first watch.

I think Dan is one of the best reviewers on the site, but I don't think these kind of movies are the best fit for him. I just went and looked at the Pineapple and Step Brothers reviews, both by Dustin, and they took into account the stupidity for what it is and could mean to the viewer. Just fun movies.

Posted by: Riles at April 8, 2011 7:03 PM

Damian Lewis is in this? Fuck you! You will not get me to Netflix this movie by dangling that ginger carrot in front of me.

I will not be manipulated in this fashion!

Posted by: greer at April 8, 2011 8:39 PM

See? I told you all it would be a turd.

Posted by: FabMax at April 9, 2011 8:40 AM

This movie was not good. There were a few good moments, but for the most part I was struggling to believe that Danny McBride was happy with this film.

See it at the dollar theater or something.

Posted by: Allen at April 9, 2011 10:52 AM

First, I am firmly in the camp of people who enjoyed Your Highness (also Pineapple Express, The Other Guys, and Superbad).

I have to correct the whole "homophobic" accusation, which I think was made because Carlson wasn't even paying attention:
(SPOILER)
When the knight confesses his love, Fabious' line is "Oh" NOT "Ew". To convey awkwardness, not disgust.
(END SPOILER)

Posted by: Karen at April 9, 2011 11:08 AM

This is a period piece. The homophobia is historically accurate.

Posted by: Daventhal at April 9, 2011 12:26 PM

Karen beat me to the correction. It is definitely an "Oh" and not an "Ew." Not that it makes the movie great or anything.

Posted by: Larold at April 9, 2011 8:06 PM

I thought this movie very entertaining. I'm not saying it's going to win any Oscars, but it did it's job. Anyone having grand expectations from Franco/McBride as being masters of high brow humor are being unrealistic.

The adds sum up the movie quite well in terms of the level of sophistication you as a viewer will encounter. While most of the film was fair, there was one element, I use the term literally, that made me laugh so hard my eyes were watering. Said element *spoiler* was Minotaur peen.

I would have missed this if my wife didn't drag me to it. So lament my lack of gentility if you must, but if you're going to cut something to pieces, at least go and see it first.

Posted by: JJ at April 21, 2011 6:11 PM

You say, ".....wouldn’t even impress underachieving 14-year-olds were it not for the preponderance of breasts, penis jokes, and bizarrely strong homophobia.....it’s hard to imagine who the film is even for, since the Internet provides much quicker access to all three....." That's like asking, "Why go do different kinds of restaurants when you can just eat food at McDonald's?" To only indulge in sex and sex jokes on the web is boring; sometimes you want more from life, and if that more includes movies of all genres that turn out to include sex and sex jokes that enter your consiousness in the different environment of being out in public with other people, thereby stimulating your imagination, then so be it. I've known people in the past that loved Dungeons & Dragons, but another side of them liked sex jokes, too. Combining them is something different. (Is this what certain Monty Python films are like? Never saw them.) Wonder what they would think of this film. It's the same effect you have when you've been doing work for two hours and you visit your co-worker at the water cooler and he tells a sex joke - it seems fresher. Anyway, I wonder how conventional TV will deal with the creature's penis around Danny McBride's neck near the end of the film. I forget - do we actually see him taking it and turning it into a necklace? If not, then TV viewers will wonder what the heck is happening when they see something on his chest constantly digitized.

Posted by: Beau Hajavitch at April 28, 2011 6:10 PM

I truly wanted to construct a quick comment so as to appreciate you for some of the awesome steps you are posting on this website. My time consuming internet search has at the end been honored with really good information to write about with my company. I would tell you that we website visitors actually are definitely lucky to dwell in a remarkable website with very many marvellous people with beneficial tricks. I feel truly privileged to have discovered your webpage and look forward to tons of more excellent times reading here. Thanks a lot once more for a lot of things.

Posted by: quit smoking at May 26, 2011 8:02 AM