web
counter
 

Winnie the Pooh Review: Silly Old Bear

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (23)



winniepooh8sm.jpg

A.A. Milne would be proud, and illustrator EH Shepard would have absolutely nothing to complain about either. In Winnie the Pooh, the former’s characters remain true to themselves as they are brought back to life and illustrated with slightly more polish but unmistakably akin to the latter’s classic hand-drawn animation, all derived from a pleasingly pastel palette. For this latest addition to the Pooh franchise, the filmmakers have clearly gone old school and largely abandoned the jazzed-up look of the more recent movies; and for this new film, the screenplay draws upon the first Winnie the Pooh book while some of it takes inspiration from the literary followup, The House at Pooh Corner. In the end, a handful of Milne’s tales are woven into a relatively seamless narrative that’s not quite as remarkable as 1977’s Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh (which included three shorts: Blustery Day, Honey Tree, and Tigger Too), but it’s a close second and will not only charm its theater audience but also find endless replays on home video.

When it comes to evaluating this new Pooh movie, one need only to apply the standards of our main character; he’s a bear of very little brain, and large words bother him. Likewise, this is a very uncomplicated movie about a collection of very simple-minded creatures who endure and enjoy relatively tame adventures. However, there’s a lot of beauty in such an honest production that manages to stir up all sorts of nostalgia without seeming at all contrived. Narrator John Cleese lovely interacts with all of the creatures in the Hundred Acre Wood: Winnie the Pooh and Tigger (both voiced by Jim Cummings); Piglet (Travis Oates); Owl (Craig Ferguson); Rabbit (Tom Kenny); Eeyore (Bud Luckey); Kanga (Kristen Anderson-Lopez); and Roo (Wyatt Dean Hall). Of course, Christopher Robin (Jack Boulter) is also front and present. The story meanders in the way that only Pooh should be allowed with the filmmakers taking great advantage of the endearing, old-school Pooh method wherein the characters often interact with the lines, and paragraphs of the story book with Pooh himself even hopping from page to page just like he used to do.

By contemporary, break-neck speed standards, not a lot happens in Winnie the Pooh, but that’s much more of a strength than a weakness. Together, the friends help Eeyore replace his lost tail and defeating the villainous Backson (which is quite reminiscent of the famed Heffalumps and Woozles). Pooh makes a sacrifice much like Piglet’s heroic act from Blustery Day; and of course we are reminded throughout of the Yellow One’s eternal quest for hunny and the amusing (and surprisingly not-obnoxious) withdrawal effects when the silly old bear goes too long without his favorite form of sustenance. While the look of this movie is undeniably more detailed and refined than the classic cartoons, the animators have taken great care to preserve the old-fashioned technique, and the visual results are rather amazing. So it’s to the filmmakers’ credit that good old Pooh can stay himself and still hold his own with a few modern touches.

All together, I’m a damn happy camper after watching Winnie the Pooh; but if I had to make one complaint, it would be that Kristen Anderson-Lopez doesn’t sound at all like Kanga. Otherwise, the voice work here is pretty stellar, particularly when it comes to Ferguson’s outrageously pompous Owl and Luckey’s chronically depressed Eeyore. Billy Connolly even pops in for a few minutes to narrate a pre-movie short called The Ballad of Nessie, and a couple of songs are nicely performed (and without too much whimsy) by Zooey Deschanel. Overall, this experience makes me long for the time I could curl up in my dad’s lap and enjoy a nice, soothing bedtime story. Winnie the Pooh doesn’t push things too far and, even though it clocks in at just under an hour (without the final credits), this movie takes its time while making its way to the conclusion, which is oddly comforting and entirely rare in today’s wham-bam, ADD-riddled kiddie flick terrain. In other words, Winnie the Pooh might not be as garishly gorgeous as Rio or as hip and obnoxious as Hop, but it does something that these two films (and most other children’s movies these days) could even approach — it’s timeless.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at Celebitchy.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Sean Bean Death Reel | Goin' to a Party Where No One's Still Alive: Mrs. Julien Cordially Invites You...









Comments

Righteous. Truly.

Posted by: Sam at July 16, 2011 1:40 PM

Too bad it got picked for this weekend to come out, but then hopefully much of the HP masses have already seen it.

Posted by: Matt at July 16, 2011 1:40 PM

My wife and five year old son went to see this yesterday, and they both thoroughly enjoyed it. It will be in our collection when it comes out on DVD.

Posted by: Codeman at July 16, 2011 1:45 PM

*will be buying*

Posted by: gp at July 16, 2011 1:53 PM

I trust your judgement because I can see you know exactly what you're talking about here. Thank you.

Posted by: Jay at July 16, 2011 2:57 PM

You have no idea how happy I was to read this. Sounds like they nailed the ideology and personalities just right.

Posted by: The Other Agent Johnson at July 16, 2011 3:05 PM

It's always good to hear of a movie I won't mind having to sit through with the kids. This does look cute.

Posted by: Sara H at July 16, 2011 4:27 PM

my grandma has the original winnie the pooh books

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at July 16, 2011 5:33 PM

Personally, I love me some Seven Acre Wood, but I really doubt the author and illustrator would be thrilled about this immortality.

From TV Tropes:

A.A. Milne grew to loathe his Winnie-the-Pooh books as it typecasted him forever as a "writer of children's books", and he could never go back to writing adult fiction. He even tried to kill off Pooh at the end of the second book. (Of course, it didn't work.) E.H. Shepard, Pooh's illustrator, also suffered from this as it overshadowed his work in political cartoons. Similarly, Milne's son, Christopher Robin, grew to hate the works as well for he was bullied constantly for being immortalized in them.

Posted by: Haystacks at July 16, 2011 6:36 PM

Haystacks, that's really interesting, I had no idea. There has to be a word for that, being most famous for what you consider a minor project.

I am just curious about the voice talent and how anyone could compare to Sterling Holloway. What an iconic voice to have to replace. And was my beloved Craig Ferguson a distraction or did he work well as Owl? Sounds great as a kid flick but as an adult, these are the things I wonder about.

Posted by: Anne At Large at July 16, 2011 7:47 PM

not watched this one yet....

Posted by: cytheria at July 16, 2011 7:54 PM

.. by Zooey Deschanel #$!?&$*&

..WHAT?

That's when you lost me.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at July 16, 2011 8:09 PM

I'd normally be all over this, but my kid cried on the Pooh ride at Disney, which is based on "Blustery Day," with which he is familiar (via DVD). He still talks about that, and it was months ago. But I'd love to see it, regardless.

Posted by: Captain Tuttle at July 16, 2011 10:28 PM

Just watched the old one from '77, which I remember watching as a kid myself in the 70's, with my 3 year old today. Taking him to see the new one this week, he loved the first. Stoked that it's his first moviegoing experience!

Posted by: Lauri at July 16, 2011 11:16 PM

Lovely review :)

We have all the old style Pooh movies and some of the new and I'm happy to say that my kids all prefer the old. We'll definitely be headed to the theater soon.

Posted by: Cindy at July 17, 2011 12:39 AM

I've always love the Pooh books, and I'm glad that this movie doesn't try to be some kind of kiddie epic. I like that they kept it simple. Thanks for the review!!!

Posted by: Jelinas at July 17, 2011 2:51 AM

But why isn't it in 3D?

Posted by: frank_247 at July 17, 2011 4:05 AM

I saw the Craig Ferguson show with Jim Cummings (the voice of Pooh) on. I know it's been mentioned on Pajiba a few times, but I'll reiterate: it's too bad most animated movies today rely on big name movie stars for the voices, because real voice actors are amazing and it really is a talent and skill. And it gives work to people who don't have "movie star looks".

Anyway, I'm glad to hear it's a good movie, even though it had the poster that looked like a sea of pee.

Posted by: MM at July 17, 2011 5:28 AM

I'm just kind of stoked that there's a movie that I can take my kids to see that might not make me cry like a bitch. I still haven't forgiven Pixar for that evil animated Lifetime movie called "Up".

Posted by: johnnyseattle at July 17, 2011 1:23 PM

I'm actually surprised at how relieved I am after reading this. Hollywood can rape and is raping many things from my childhood and it pisses me off, but Winnie the Pooh is on another level when it comes to sacred childhood memories. I remember watching The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh a million times as a child and being enraptured by all the lovely pastel colors, carrying my Pooh bear stuffed animal around, etc.

Glad to know that Hollywood can still get it right sometimes. You don't need A-list actors doing voicework, pop culture references and 3D animation to create a wonderful children's movie.

Posted by: LaRhue at July 17, 2011 3:38 PM

I would like to echo the others here by saying thank you to whoever is responsible for holding the reigns here and keeping Pooh, Pooh.

heheh pooh pooh

Posted by: Protoguy at July 17, 2011 8:04 PM

It's a cold. I'll probably catch it too.

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at July 18, 2011 10:55 AM

My Heart is warmed. I am happy to hear this is good.

It shows that some things don't need to change, and that the old ways are still right and proper too.

Thank you, for affirming my faith in Pooh.

Who, after all, was Canadian. Good old Winnipeg.

Posted by: Uncommoner at July 19, 2011 2:20 AM