web
counter
 

I Just Want To Save You While There’s Still Something Left To Save

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (20)



alg_kristen_stewart_bare.jpg

For most actors, getting a regular gig on a television show or a film series is a boon, because essentially you can make enough money that you will never have to work again. The problem is - most actors want to work again. When you’ve been playing an iconic character for years, it’s hard for people to separate you from that work, and so most actors will take on really radically different roles. And it tends to be a mixed bag as to how that turns out. You look at someone like Sarah Michelle Gellar, who hasn’t done a whole hell of a lot since she hung up her stakes. Or the casts of “Friends” or “Seinfeld,” who hasn’t really been able to shake those enigmatic personas - aside from maybe one or two small interesting roles here or there. And things don’t really bode too well for any of the children from Harry Potter, save perhaps Rupert Grint. Both Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson have been trying like hell to remind everyone that there will be life for them after Twilight — and not with much success. Much to the disbelief of the internet, Kristen Stewart isn’t a terrible actress, but she’s been making some terrible choices, trying to adopt some sort of badass persona by taking on increasingly rowdier characters. James Gandolfini was doing pretty good for himself there, with interesting turns on his bulldog Mafioso with Romance and Cigarettes and In The Loop. But Rileys casts both actors completely against their usual types, and it just feels like a giant game of pretend. Particularly when they are paired against the likes of Melissa Leo, who just runs away with the film. If they wanted to shake the shadows of their alter egos, taking on a Ken Hixon script — who with Inventing the Abbots and City By The Sea — has made a career of wasting star talent in directionless, meandering mopefests. Jake Scott, son of Ridley, doesn’t do much with the material either, banking on the performances to get us through. And while there are a couple of very nice moments, ultimately Welcome to the Rileys just sags like a heavy trawler finally dragging itself into dock.

If you’ve watched the trailers, they’ve conveniently told you everything that happens in the movie, which saves me a lot of time. Anything that might have been an interesting surprise or a unique moment gets spoiled both by the preview and by the obviousness of the script. It was like Ken Hixon used a template in Movie Magic Screenwriter to do “Tragic Family Falling Apart” story, and just plugged in the elements like he was putting together a Build-A-Bear for a child that doesn’t want to smile. Doug Riley (James Gandolfini) smokes a lot and is sad. His daughter died in a car wreck and his wife, Lois (Melissa Leo), has become rabidly agoraphobic. He’s been having an affair with a pancake house waitress for four years, but the daughter died 8 years ago at age 15, and they’ve been married for almost 30 years, so when you do the griefonomics, you don’t fucking care.

Everyone’s miserable, so when Doug goes to New Orleans for a contractors’ conference, he just wants to be alone. He wanders into a seedy strip club where we finally meet Mallory (Kristen Stewart), a fifteen year old stripper who offers Doug sexual favors in the champagne room. Doug has no interest in her sexually, because she looks a lot like his daughter. So Doug decides to take care of the foul-mouthed, sore-covered little strumpet and basically care for her like she was his daughter. He calls his wife and tells her he’s staying in New Orleans, and so she conquers her agoraphobia and drives down from Indianapolis. Confronted with the situation, Lois gets ready to leave. If only she made it, she wouldn’t have to suffer through the rest of the watered down plot where they all try to play house together. I could tell you how it turns out, or you could simply watch every other movie like this and figure it out for yourself.

It’s a pretty shoddy plot no matter how you slice it. The Rileys are trying to bond in a shitty house over a girl who’s riddled with pottymouth and pottycrotch. She doesn’t go off to school in the morning, she’s blowing weirdos fresh off Bourbon Street for $50. It would almost make sense for Doug to bang her, but she’s such a repulsive and self-absorbed mutant, it’s impossible for anyone to care about her. The sheer fact that he tries to go all Henry Higgins on a whore makes little to no sense. Even worse is that his wife is somehow complicit in the situation. And the sad part is, I understand where Hixon was going with this script — in that he actively seemed like he was trying to play it against type by not having Doug try to screw Mallory, and by not making the wife run away, and by not having them take her out of her element, and by not having Doug allow her to continue. Problem is the alternative to the cliché is really fucking stupid. And Jake Scott’s not adding anything with his direction, just kind of letting scenes flop along on their own faux film-school serious-face. If anything, I think he hamstrung what was already a flawed script with inept casting.

It’s certainly not buoyed any by the performances. Melissa Leo is scary terrific as Lois. Easily that part could have been played shrill and frosty. Instead, Leo plays Lois with these wonderful moments of sheer adorable naivety. Particularly in the wake of her hardass performance in Conviction. Gandolfini, god bless him, is breaking out that terrible countrified twang of his that’s just nails on a glass chalkboard. He’s like a bear who wandered into an office meeting. He’s playing Doug like the 180 version of Tony Soprano, and it’s obviously the direction he was going for. He’s like a weird Donny Osmond version of his usual brash Jersey, and it doesn’t sit well. I’m not saying Gandolfini’s incapable of playing nice or sweet or lovable, but this is such a phony iteration of that. And Kristen Stewart is basically taking her little-girl dressup version of Joan Jett and adding f-bombs and cocktalk to the mix, and it’s even more embarrassing. She plays Mallory like a naughty 15 year old, when this is a girl who’s been on the streets, who’s handled more cock than a lineman at Tyson Chicken, and who’s smoking like a chimney. Stewart doesn’t have the gravitas; she’s still playing Bella. And what’s weird is, had she just recreated her character from Adventureland with a little more edge, it would have worked. You just don’t believe she’s been down and dirty. And things aren’t certainly helped by the strange Natalie-Nudity on set. There are several scenes where it would have been appropriate for her to be fully nude, and there are instances where we do see half ass-shots, but it doesn’t help but make her character feel even more virginal. Which is the exact opposite. The irony is that I think this would have been a perfect role for Megan Fox, who doesn’t have the acting chops of Stewart, but would have been better.

If the actors thought they’d ditch their dopplegangers with these roles, it only served to remind us how much better they are as Tony Soprano and Bella Swan respectively. At least it showcased Melissa Leo and gave her yet another reason to start picking out gowns for February. I’m actually interested to see what Jake Scott’s planning to do next, since he has such a bizarre resume. His only other feature was Plunkett and Maclaine, and before that he directed the video for the Smashing Pumpkin’s “Disarm.” Welcome to the Rileys is exactly what you expect it to be, another one of those Sundance darlings that’s the result of overt hype. It’s another one of the dreary, melancholy, family rebuilding tragedies that always pop up around Oscar time, and it really could have benefitted from stronger leads.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Perils of Prognostication | Sesame Street Butts Heads with the NYTimes on the Benefits of Toddlers Using iPhones









Comments

to be fair Stewart was fucking great in "Speak" and she was like 14 at the time?
I guess it's true that blockbusters kill your soul

Posted by: rio at November 3, 2010 2:45 PM

Actually if you do the research I believe Kristen Stewart was filming "Welcome to the Rileys" when Catherine Hardwicke flew down to New Orleans to audition her for the role of Bella. She made "Adventureland" and "The Runnaways" after this movie, but both were in the pipeline before the release of "Twilight" - so if you didn't like her it was just her acting not reinventing a bad ass Bella. I believe her new film "On the Road" will be her first real choice of movie roles sense all the "Twilight" mania began.

Posted by: Midwest Fan at November 3, 2010 3:20 PM

Priso, I think that this review should be a PSA for typcasted actors who have far less talent then they believe. Just stick with what you're good at.

Posted by: admin at November 3, 2010 3:33 PM

"who’s handled more cock than a lineman at Tyson Chicken"

I'm gonna go ahead and slow clap that line.

Genius.

Posted by: D-Day at November 3, 2010 3:47 PM

The header picture tells me she has no acting range. (Full disclosure: I've never actually watched her in anything other than the half hour of Twilight my girlfriend was able to forcibly subject me to, so I'm talking out of my ass here.)

That picture would be hot if it were anyone else. She's got that ugly blank emotionless look on her face. Can she smile or does she have the same problem as Stahl on SOA?

Posted by: Paultera at November 3, 2010 3:53 PM

I don't think Kristen is trying to tell us anything. She filmed Welcome to the Riley's almost immediately after filming Twilight. Adventureland and The Cake Eaters were filmed prior. The only movies you can arguably judge when it comes to Kristen's choices post-Twilight career is The Runaways and the upcoming On The Road. Unfortunately, people don't realize that Kristen has been attached to a lot of these projects long before Twilight's success.

Posted by: Nadia at November 3, 2010 5:03 PM

Melissa Leo is the shit. She also told me I was a good actor once. I'm just saying.

Posted by: m&M at November 3, 2010 7:51 PM

Don't worry, there will be no Oscar buzz for WTTR. They must have kept the booze flowing freely at Sundance, but not anymore. Anne Thompson has weighed in on that:

Welcome To The Rileys, for example, would in another world get attention for James Gandolfini, perhaps even Kristen Stewart. Thompson thought that it could have a chance when she first saw it at Sundance, but now “in the sober light of day,” believes it “has no chance in hell.”

And Midwest Fan is wrong, Kristen filmed WTTR after she filmed Twilight, not before. She was 18 when she filmed WTTR and she began filming Twilight when she was 17. It doesn't make any difference anyway, her Twilight fans are not even supporting her indy bombs.

Posted by: Truthteller at November 3, 2010 7:53 PM

Films like this give "independent film" its bad rep...introspective, poorly scripted, weirdly cast, confusing pieces of self indulgent filmmaking.

And if KS filmed this before that well know franchise that I won't mention, then it's a good thing she got that gig because, from what I've seen, she's not ready for her close up, Mr. DeMille.

Posted by: Patricia at November 3, 2010 10:03 PM

I've loved Melissa Leo since H:LotS, so I'm glad she's getting more work now. She really is phenomenal. Sorry she's in a movie that is reportedly so lacking in every other way.

Posted by: Edith at November 4, 2010 1:33 AM

The picture used here is from a movie she did in 2006/7 called "The Cake Eaters" where she plays a handicap girl... so using this photo is odd imo.

Welcome to the Rileys was filmed immediately after Twilight wrapped (before it was released and she became famous) Even On the Road is a movie she has been connected with for years. She has yet to make a movie that was a "decision" after her role of Bella, with the exception of the Runaways which she signed onto right after Twilight. I'm not even a journalist, but this information is out there & a little bit of research makes one's opinions about an actor slightly more credible.

Posted by: mave at November 4, 2010 3:03 AM

Kristen Stewart has acting chops?
What is the writer of this article smoking?

She is playing a promiscuous character in all the roles for several years: Into the Wild(Sean Penn hired her to parade around in her underwear for 10 min.), in Adventureland the same(she plays a slutty girl), Runaways(again trying desperately to be sexy only this time as a lesbian, that must not have been a stretch for her), now this film and in On The Road she is having threesome twice, the scenes are almost pornographic.

Posted by: ave at November 4, 2010 5:24 AM

I liked Stewart in Adventureland. I thought she handled that role very realistically. I won't watch Twilight so I have no idea how awful she is in it, but given the character, could ANYONE bring it to life? Bella has to stay a completely blank slate so all the little girls can picture THEIR face on her body.

I'll see this because of Melissa Leo who I first saw in 21 Grams and have made a point to watch ever since.

Posted by: Wednesday at November 4, 2010 8:27 AM

The fact that she defends the Twilight movies is all that needs saying. Pathetic.

Posted by: Skeetikus at November 4, 2010 9:59 AM

That profile pic makes her look like a character out of the "Doonsbury" comic-strip.

Posted by: Rykker at November 4, 2010 10:01 AM

....rise against lyric in the header made my day.

Posted by: Beckells at November 4, 2010 3:10 PM

Someone wrote that On The Road will be the only new thing Kristen has done. Partly true she signed on for it in 2008 brfore Twilight. The thing is it doesn't matter because you could sit and put up different sets and give her different roles and it would be the same thing again and again. Kristen does try to look the part but the performance is always flat just like her.The funny thing is there is no way anyone is going to pay her $50.00 for services rendered when she looks like a walking disease in the movie. I know how crazy New Orleans can be.(I've been to Mardi Gras a few times and it's pretty weird)Even with all that a guy doesn't have to pay for something that looks like Kristen does in this movie. The bigger joke is that anyone would hire her as a stripper who would pay to see her? Kristen was bragging that she was offered a job as a stripper in New Orleans and the girl is so stupid she doesn't understand how insulted she should feel, it was not a compliment! Don't believe me go to New Orleans and see for yourself.

Posted by: Sally at November 5, 2010 1:40 AM

Strippers in New Orleans look good. Like most strippers in other parts of the world, you have to look decent (according the their standards) in order to get the tips and to have repeat customers for the club. On Bourbon Street, the girls look good, have great bodies, nice faces, and are professional. It's their job to get the tips. I've been to the shows and have enjoyed some lapdances. It's just part of the French Quarter experience.

Posted by: Patricia at November 5, 2010 10:32 PM

She looks like a dude in that pic.

Posted by: HDH3 at November 6, 2010 10:54 AM

Next time I read through a blogs, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as much as this one. I'm talking about, I am aware it was eventually my choice to read, however I essentially thought you'll have something useful to express. Most I hear is mostly a bunch of whining about something you might fix if you werent too busy looking for consideration.

Posted by: Mac nick at January 23, 2011 1:41 PM